Knowledge talk:WikiProject LGBT studies/Archive 23

1390:. The continuum (excluding lists) for us is Stub-Start-C-B-GA-A-FA, which follows the Version 1.0 Editorial Team continuum. I participated in the community discussion about setting up the C-class (I supported) and also some discussion about where the A-class should be in that continuum (below GA or above GA). My vote was that it should be below GA, for a C-B-A flow before getting to GA. Here (to the right) are the current assessment statistics so we can see where we are now. Note that there currently is an order of magnitude more articles in B-class than GA-class. Could we, as a WikiProject, and differently from milhist, use A-class articles as a developmental pad for GA-class, since C-B-A class articles do not require a community wide review process? Or more in line with Moni's thoughts as a staging area for FA. Also, I think she is right about our project assessment structure. Is it worth doing something about it? Or just continue as is? Frankly, I have doubts about getting enough people together. — 2168:

impose 2009 standards by a handful of individuals to define in concrete terms how people behaved when these concepts did not exist. One of my favorite quotes is by author Djuna Barnes, who had affairs with women and participated in Natalie Barney's Paris salon for Sapphists, but was famously quoted saying, "I am not a lesbian. I just loved Thelma." What about Edna St. Vincent Millay who had affairs with women, but such was the social atmosphere in Greenwich Village in the 1920s that there was no coherent gay or lesbian community, but rather a neighborhood of Bohemians and rebels who believed in free love and embodied all kinds of liberal attitudes except when it came to gender roles; Lillian Faderman suggest Millay married and had affairs with men due to the enormous pressures of Greenwich Village males in her social circle. --

670:(as have some of you - thank you), and I noticed several stubs which should not normally have been placed in the category. It may be that the way the category is used for stub-sorting purposes is a little different to how some other editors - including probably some of your project - are using it. Specifically, bio-stubs shouldn't be added to the category simply because they are about LGBT people. Let's face it, if every bio-stub about LGBT people was added to the category that'd be - what, 6-8% of the 100,000 bio-stubs we have on Knowledge? It would completely swamp the category with people who, though LGBT, have had little impact on LGBT culture. To that end, I've added a note at the top of the category - feel free to amend it, but if possible please try to keep the spirit of it intact! Cheers, 758:. Given how many LGBT people there are, if biographical articles were given LGBT-stub (or LGBT-bio-stub), you'd end up with a category that was too large to use easily that was filled with articles many of which have only tangential connection to LGBT issues and culture. As for LGBT-bio-stub, it hasn't been deleted, though it's not currently in much use. The outcome of the SFD debate was that it could be used but should be appropriately worded and scoped so as to ensure that it is used in pretty much the way I've outlined above. For some reason it looks as though no-one's got round to rewording it (to be honest, I'm not sure how it could be easily reworded to cover the type of stubs I've mentioned). (Thanks to Aleta to alerting me to the follow-up questions) 711:(1) I had created an lgbt-bio-stub template a while ago, in an ill-informed, out-of-process manner. I don't think it has been deleted, but I was made aware of the incorrect manner in which I did things. (One does not simply create a stub template one thinks should exist; it has to go through the vetting process where others may or may not agree that it should exist.) In this case, others involved in the stub-sorting process do not think there should be such a stub category. (2) I think Grutness is saying that biography articles do not generally belong in the lgbt-stub category. 3282:

homosexual people. For transgenders it is a more serious issue, whereas with homosexual I think it is done more of a joking fashion (such as in Will & Grace, Jack and Will I am pretty sure have said 'girls' or 'ladies' when talking collectively about themselves and/or female friends like Grace or that drunk woman). I am more familiar with the gay male usage of female terms, does anyone know any examples of lesbians (my guess moreso the ones who adopt more perceivedly masculine pasttimes like athletics, 'butch' etc) using 'boys' or 'men' self-referenced?

1744:

articles just as other projects do. It's perfectly reasonable that our tag would sit comfortably on these articles if they concern subjects about same-sex desire and activities. No special guideline is needed except if it regards a LGBT subject. The tag is the easiest component regarding this project's involvement. It's quite general and intended to alert those smart enough to use the talkpage to know we exist and are willing to help. Categories have a much higher standard and need policing but our tag is relatively safe.

974:

writing, and sources. We appear to be many individuals working alone on our projects, as opposed to a group working toward a common goal. I'm not sure why that is, or really what to do about it. Furthermore, I suppose we would have to determine that A class is worthwhile as a kind of intermediary between GA and FA, and that there are enough articles to warrant A class designation. Is it a pre-FA staging area? Or an assessment for articles that are beyond GA but for whatever reasons, have not been promoted as FA? --

3517:

In later books, when Baum gave up his dream of being successful on the stage, he changed her history, saying that she was left behind by Lurline to rule Oz when the land was first enchanted. Of course later authors tended to prefer the idea of her being transformed, and adhered more strictly to that version of her history. So, in my humble opinion, if you want to call her Baum's character, she's not--but if you want to say that she belongs to everyone who writes about her, she certainly is.

1765:(what, no fourthly? lol) okay, firstly, fair enough, i accidently called that particular one as a bot-added tag. I had seen enough SatyrBot taggings that I assumed it was the case. Secondly, no comment, Thirdly, really I don't care -- If consensus is infact to tag these then I will happily self-revert. Thank God SatyrBot can't read the minds of article subjects as well, or every "straight" person who ever had a gay fantasy would be project-tagged as well. :-) 31: 1059: 1036: 3306:

But this is an issue of masculinity and femininity and gender roles, not necessarily physiology or sexuality. Boys who refuse to adhere to what is considered masculine are ostracized. Girls and femininity somewhat, but not as severe as boys. What are you suggesting actually? Improvement/expansion to which articles? And of course, any material would have to be cited with a reliable source. Do you have any in mind? --

3286:

much like homosexuals I think these people may embrace these in a positive fashion "just one of the girls/boys" in a joking manner much like homosexuals can, rather than more seriously as a transgender would who has a strong belief of identifying with that gender enough to want to be referred to by it at all times. Pejorative uses are also notable (and they are probably frequent enough), and already in the

1082: 3442:, though this is getting somewhat subjective - he changes back and forth and never identifies as female, etc. The lack of clarity probably comes from how unrealistic these changes are -- in real life we don't have to categorize people who magically change sex against their will. Regardless of if we decide Ozma is transgender, it still might be handy to have 730:

actually having a great impact on LGBT culture or history overall. An fairly crude analogy might be someone like Keanu Reeves being famous as an actor but also widely known for his musical sideprojects. If there was a stub article on him, he would get US-actor-stub but would only get US-musician-stub as well if his band was prominent. As I said in a recent

2346: 1968: 1697: 2266:, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators. 3102:. This material, like a great ooze that grows and multiplies, never seems to let up and new problematic articles just compound. In any case I'm wondering if anyone else sees the first four above as needing to be merged? If I didn't know better I'd AfD the lot but I think merging is the better route. Any ideas, comments. 2373:. Both comments so far have been non-project members deferring to our judgement (which so far, since its addition in 2007, has been no objection). I am posting this here not to canvass, but to get project member input on it (whether for or against) and reach consensus now, rather than dragging it out. Thanks, 3678:

has people connecting the scarecrow with turn of the 20th century farmers, the tin man with industrialists, and the lion with the labor movement. Dorothy's silver slippers (in the book) walking on the yellow-brick (gold) road is a statement about what to use to back currency: gold or silver. Baum may

3516:

There's good evidence that Ozma was only given her rather unique history because Baum intended his second book to be made into a play like his first book was, and Tip, being a young boy, would have been played by a woman. As far as the stage was concerned, the transformation couldn't be more natural.

3305:

I'm trying to understand what you're saying, and I may fall short. It is far worse for a boy to be called a girl than a girl to be called a boy. I noticed this when I was a teacher. It was the worst thing a boy could say to another boy and fights would erupt, while the girls shrugged and walked away.

2085:

Um, what exactly is the reasoning in having bisexuals as a group (or any letter of the alphabet soup) listed in 2 separate lists at the same time? Either the Bi list is redundant to the LGB list, or the LGB list is redundant to the Bi list. Transgender has its own list, but this is not a duplicate as

1866:

A transwiki redirect can be set up instead of deletion. The wiktionary article on gay should already have all the translations, so the reader still gets all the info, just as easily. Bit i would guess that the transwiking will not happen soon. The template looks like a standard one for dicdef's and i

1834:

was flagged for automated copying to Wiktionary on 11 Feb, but hasn't been transwikied yet. Copying does not equal deletion, but this likely will be become an AfD once the transwiki is complete. It would be a shame to lose this list, but not sure what the rescue potential is to get it up to code (see

1580:

from cat:Gay novels as I have been informed by another editor that (most?) of his novels are not LGBT-themed. Before further de-populating this category wanted to ask for clarification over this category's scope. (i.e. is it for gay-themed novels, and the gay-authored novels were mistakenly added, or

2643:

had been tagged for merging for over a year (and were the oldest merge tags listed in our cleanup list). I was going to remove the tags as stale, but the 2 articles were pretty much extremely redundant (except the latter is more up-to-date). I replaced GayVN with a redirect to GayVN Awards (since no

2063:

I concur. It's fine to have a full LGBT, just T, just L, just G and just B lists as appropriate. The labels we presently use don't easily translate across culture and time. Having the same person on several lists is also fine - over time one can be gay, bisexual and transgender, etc. I would support

1805:

All LGBT celebrities get project tagged AFAIK, and i don't think porn stars are any less important to LGBT studies than minor soap opera stars, or failed reality TV show contestants. If they acted in gay or Bi porn, may as well leave them tagged (although i don't think there is any rush to make sure

1652:

it might be a bit long. I'd also look closely at the reliability of the sources used. But I wouldn't go so far as to say it's on tabloid level. It could definitely do with a work-over though, with more neutral wording and summarizing to cut down the length, it looks like it could be cleaned up to be

992:

I would find it useful, but agree that it depends on people doing the in depth reviews needed, and only if it used as a "i think this is ready for FA but needs a final review" check. The gap between GA and FA is so huge, and peer review only provides so much feedback. I suspect it woulod become just

904:

I posted the rewrite of the Lesbian article on February 10. It is up at wiki-wide peer review. You folks are the ones who can give it the best comments, though. Anything you can give. Even if it's just a section... With some more work, I think this article can be FA, though it might take a few tries

189:

up to GA, but anyone with any knowledge about either might notice things that i'm missing (unfortunately i'm on a wrong continent for first-hand experience), or even anyone with no knowledge that is interested in collaborating. Any newbies that want some GA/FL experience? Experienced editors to show

3876:

I would oppose but not with eggs. They should be similar as queer studies by default would include a section on theory whereas the theory article would only need a mention that studies exist. They likely need to be cleaned up to separate the two. In looking at them they actually seem quite distinct

3539:

I wouldn't tag her as LGBT (either bi or trans) until a reliable sources are found. Changing sex by magical means could be a metaphor for bisexuality, transexuality, and myriad non-sexual things. If it a metaphor for women's equality and suffrage, then the fact it takes a form superficially similar

2906:

If it's notable enough to include then... probably. We are a resource to ensure the content regarding LGBT is handled encyclopedicly. LGBT issues remain central to culture wars and remain central to conflicts and POV problems on articles. I'd rather err on including than regret not being there when

2879:

I saw it on our alerts, and removed our tag. It seemed to be only there because they are against gay marriage, and that this is only a minor part of their activities. We don't tag every politician or organisation that mentions this as one of the things on their agenda, do we? Otherwise we should be

177:

This has been up at featured list candidates for coming up to a week, and is maybe floundering for lack of reviews. Assuming i convince the 2 reviewers so far, it would still need more to be able to pass. It has a minimum of 10 days for reviewing (so 3 more), but extentions to the time require that

3605:

is a foil, or perhaps the other way around. While she is not so in later books, Jinjur is infantile and tries to combine the extremes of masculine and feminine and simply comes off as absurd. I do not think that Ozma being a good role model for LGBT makes her LGBT, and I think she is a good role

3586:

I mean, if someone performed unauthorized sex reassignment surgery on you, would you really be a transgender? Physical transsexual perhaps, but even that was imposed upon you by somone else. If gender is between the ears, then so is transgender, and I do not think that the books provide evidence

3285:

Even barring this (which I think exists) these words are also used in a pejorative sense even against those who don't use it, such as to insult homosexuals, or to insult people who have certain characteristics not associated with their sex/gender ("pansy" guys, "tomboy" girls). In the latter case,

2813:

good thinking on the noincludes... so are we keeping inactives indefinitely, or is there a time-out on those also? Neutral on the deceased list ... I actually thought it was kind of wiki-poetic how he was moved to inactive status. (if we were to start rolling people off of inactive after a certain

2796:

I changed the transcluded page, so that only the active members are on the main page, but the inactive members list is still on the mambers subpage. Also started moving editors inactive for 6 months to the inactive list. No opinion on adding a deceased list, but would be simple to put one onto the

2491:

Thanks for the tip, didn't know that list existed (& I probably wasn't the only project member in that) ... I added a link into the open tasks template (which is transcluded here & on the main project page), and commented out the headings which previously served the same purpose as the bot

2208:

Agree w/ both of your comments, sexuality is a complex thing. The only way to split without breaking down by sexual identity labels would be to split by gender (like Yobmod suggested). While an interesting idea, it would open its own can of worms in regards to gender identity. Which leaves us with

2167:

Sorry I'm coming late to this party, but I agree that this was a good decision. Where I probably would not have cared some months ago, the recent involvement I had in the Lesbian article made my mind up. Sexual identity and behavior are often two separate things, and it would not be a good idea to

1719:

What exactly is the policy regarding this (if consensus ever was established for this)? Back in the day, SatyrBot auto-tagged pretty much everything with a gay keyword in it, from my understanding -- though this no longer happens, so some porn stars are project-tagged, and some aren't. I re-tagged

1492:

One note, as well: I was a bit confused in the plot summary about the bit with the tengu. It might be worth introducing that figure earlier on: is this someone who had cursed the children at some point in early life to experience life as the other gender? Also, when the curse is lifted and you say

4173:

A lots of prods, merges and finally a group AfD came to the conclusion that individual "year in LGBT rights" are not needed, (unless there is particular reason that year has a lot of content, which may be the case for more recent years). As a result, i've merged them into decade article or longer

3128:

would be best (if there is anything not copied from there). We don't (and shouldn't) have "cis-mem attracted to women", "cis-women attract to women", "cis-men attracted to trans-women" etc etc. There are general and used terms for these things for a reason, and wikipedia should be using them, not

1575:

is a child category of cat:LGBT novels and cat:Gay (male) fiction. After accidently LGBT-novel-stubbing (& self-reverting) some of the novels within the author sub-categories within it, I added a header note specifying cat:Gay novels is for gay-themed novels & not just gay-authored novels

973:

I'm aware of MilHist's A class review. MilHist is an extremely productive WikiProject with clear goals to get articles as high as possible. I think any attempt to improve LGBT articles should be commended, but I have honest doubts that we as a group are capable of assessing articles for content,

3572:

I believe that Ozma does not belong in the category because a transformation imposed by magic has nothing to do with real-life transgender issues. Being transgender is a paychological issue that I do not believe that there is any indication that Ozma has in any Baum text or anything within the

3281:

so far as I can see only represent the majority's common usage of the term. I do not contest that these should remain the main topics that take up the majority of the articles, however I think there should be a place in these articles explaining that the terms are also used by transgendered and

729:

Basically, a person should only be given a specific type of bio-stub if they made a significant impact to a specific field (the exception being nationality types). While sexual orientation is, of course, very important to the individuals concerned, often a person can be, say, lesbian without it

2546:

Ah, thanks! The alerts page list all the open requests for review for virtually all processes. The link above goes to the age showing only the articles tagged with the LGBT project banner. Hence one can find the peer review for lesbian, the good article nomination of homosexual transexual, and

2423:

I've just suggested it be deleted. Setting aside the questions of offensiveness, nothing links to that page except discussion pages like this one and an IP usertalk page within a vandalism warning. I can't actual imagine anyone searching for the LGBT project would use WP:HOMO as a search term.

2089:

I'd say that it's just a question of reader utility, where duplication is better than the initial split-and-bin-comprehensive-list proposal (which I see you've withdrawn; just saying this for illustrative purposes). I can imagine readers having a use for the more specific lists, but given that

1515:

You're not alone in being confused about the tengu - the reviews I've read are confused about him too. The father or the children cross paths with the tengu in a previous life, so the tengu curses them to have the wrong gender-sex alignment from their current birth. Luckily, the tengu (or the

152:

I'm going to have to agree. Since the article (and I assume, sources) makes clear that he was married to a woman, it'd be quite a leap to categorize him as gay based on that single sentence. I note you haven't even included anything based on that sentence in the article, and from what I recall

1743:

and not the bot originally added it. If you removed the tag from other articles that may be true of those as well. Secondly, SatyrBot was pretty accurate and I believe was quickly followed up to ensure it had found correct articles. Thirdly, we serve as a resource on LGBT issues in regards to

930:

Another plea for anyone in Europe to point me toward reliable sources that account for media representation of lesbianism. The film and television sections of the Lesbian article are centered in North America because I don't know what books to use to highlight media outside the US and Canada.

3397:

At the heart of the question seems to be if transgenderism is strictly a question of gender identity and bodily dysphoria or applies more generally to people with significant experience in both sexes or gender roles. I am asking for help in settling the question of whether Ozma qualifies as

1493:

their "sex realigns with their gender", does that mean Naishi no Kami become physically female and the Chunagon physically male, or is it the opposite - Naishi no Kami starts to feel male and the Chunagon starts to feel female? I'm guessing the latter, but that could maybe use clarification.

153:

categories should be supported by the article text. Basically, if the source isn't strong enough to write something clearly in the text, it's probably not strong enough for categorizing either. (BTW Otto, I'm continously in awe at the amount of quality articles you produce. Good job, truly!)

1723:

I can appreciate the pron as much as the next guy, but how exactly does someone sucking it on camera for money qualify them as an "LGBT studies" to be chronicled in the annals of LGBT history? (and would a straight studies wikiproject do the same, when a more relevent project exists?) Thx,

178:

it is being improved, any i've done all the improving i can find to do. I'm not expecting automatic supports, just any comments at all would be great. It's the last in a planned Featured topic, so would hopefully get a big jump in visibility if it passes (and be the first LGBT FT, AFAIK).

2989:

Sorry, I over-reacted as I'm so used to snarkiness (sigh), sorry. In this case the point is there was no need to delete as it's likely the entire article is deleted. If it were kept I still would have wanted to look into it as many of these groups are wolves in disguise and are actually

4230:

I'm mixed on this. It seems like we should have these articles as we have so many biographies and organizations just listing the years when people were born, died and groups established would start to populate these. I would instead establish where each of those year in articles

1670: 3600:

I believe Baum's point, other than to prepare something appropriate for the pantomime stage (ironically, in the play, Ozma is simply a girl in disguise as Tip and magic does not play a role), was to present someone of balanced virtues in endorsement of women's suffrage.

2227:

As arbitrary as it is, I think the phonebook style works pretty well. And if a reader is looking for a specific category of L G or B, it's still possible to sort the tables based on the "Notes" column (now there's a vague name btw), making it easier to sift through.

2269:

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. —

3389:

sees things differently. He believes that Ozma does not qualify as transgender because the nature of her transformation is magical and she never experiences any gender identity problems as either sex. Also, in the early plays it is specified that Ozma is merely

2709:

I think this image has enough of a rationale that deletion can be avoided this time and i commented there, but in the long term i agree a free image is essential. Starr is a modern boy, her should understand the benefits of releasing the best possible image as

2972:

You didn't, thats why i asked. Should i preface every question with "This is a question"? <--that was a question, i'm not suggesting you said i should do this :-D As the whole organisation is non-notable, how is one press release they made notable to the

2697:

There's not really a lot you can do in this situation unfortunately. Policy isn't on your side, though the image can still be used for the article about the magazine. I'd do as was suggested and attempt to contact Star asking for him to release something.

3417:

My first hunch would be to go to the sources: Is there any scholarly discussion of the subject, one way or the other? I understand that the question's scope is broader - it's not just about self-identification - but that might be a good place to start.

2118:

Intergrating the Bi list has been tried before - some very vociferous editors consider that an attempt to hide or minimise bisexuality. I would prefer it merged, as the Bi list has low standards of sourcing, but the fight it would cause is not worth

688:

Hm. I'm confused. Are you saying stub articles about LGBT people should not be in both a bio-stub and an lgbt-stub? Or is there a lgbt-bio-stub category? I know very little about stub sorting, so these questions are totally out of ignorance :) --

3547:

explain that it includes characters that change gender by magical or science fictional means that may not be consensual or have anything to do with gender-identity. Should characters that are emaculated as a form of torure be included in a trans

4118:

I updated the table, after doing some basic research confirming it. Sheesh, I didn't know about that... Article should probably expand upon it a bit, not hard finding (reliable) sources discussing it. I will see if I have the energy to do so...

4174:

time periods if there was still not more than one event per decade. Note i only merge up until the 1970's, as later articles have more content (which may be bloat or not, so have to be decided individually). This gives the articles found here (

2734:

The sexology project flushed their inactives list a week or 2 ago... Given how huge the main page is, maybe this would be a good idea here too? (with the obvious exception of number 120) We have 251 actives and 121 in-actives listed currently.

3464:

I'd say yes. Having gender identity issues has nothing to do with it. You might need to amend a description on the category page that articles including gender transitions or where more than one gender may also be included. You can start with

2406:

If i'm the only one that sees a problem w/ this then it's no big deal & i'll drop it. I guess to me, it's kind of like the word "nigga" (with "-a", not "-er"). each carries different connotations when used by ppl outside the group.

2313:

The intent, as I understand, is to ensure at least one active member is in the loop rather than spamming every project with each new discussion and rounds of input, voting. Anything notable enough could still be posted to the group.

3435:, who seems to claim Baum's ideas are Spiritualist in nature, and so he was probably not trying to develop any (repressed or otherwise) transgender ideas. This doesn't completely satisfy the question of if Ozma is transgender. 296:

cover occupation? Culling this to what could be sourced would seem redundant to other lists and a lot of work. I thought it best to invite comments here before adding a merge template or posting to the BLP violations board.

3823:

Agree that continents is not ideal. Was just thinking that the category could easily have 40 non-sub-cated members without ever having more than 3 per Asian country, so might end up looking strange. But is good enough for

3006:

The AFD on the American "College" of Pediatricians was closed as delete due to copyvio. Someone with big Sarah Palin and nOBAMA images on their userpage disagreed with that and it is now at deletion review. See ].

2841: 2507:

If anyone click on the article alerts above, it would be great if they clicked further on the FT candidates, and left a comment! We currently have 2 topics waiting for comments, both with no opposes, but too few

2389:

I don't have any problems with it. Will & Grace characters called it each other, so nothing offensive about it to me (which i guess is the potential problem?). I sometimes use it as it is easier to type and

2944:

Please show me where I suggested we should tag every article of every congressperson who has voted on LGBT issues. Clearly I didn't. I stated "If it's notable enough to include then ... " My hunch is that on

2860: 2780:

Moving it to a subpage is better, so the info is easily accessible. But i agree it is too long to be on the main project page. We should also go through the active list to identify inactive members again.

3963:

So, queer theory is about studying/creating queer interpretations of texts by closely reading them and picking apart different interpretations? And queer studies is about people rather than texts????

955: 1843:

is already pretty long -- and burying it in there would make it lose its appeal as a quick-and-dirty list of terms for gay in various languages/cultures (it is actually linked-to in the Intro of

2928:

So should we tag all congressmen? (Have any not voted on at least one "protection of marriage" act?) Just wondering - the level of LGBT interest is at least as high as for this article (was).

2671:, a BLP, rise to fame came from doing high-concept genderfuck fashion photoshoots and building an online fan-base. The only image that helps show them doing this is being slated for deletion 3633:

Regardless of what Baum intended, relaible sources show the character is seen that way. If you have a reliabla source that he did not intend it at all then you would put both and contrast -

2263: 1998:

Listing this here since I'm not sure how many people monitor the main GLB dab/contents page, and notifying all 19 talk pages might be viewed as overkill -- I have raised a split proposal at

4096:

for this). I'm not entirely sure how to edit the table to reflect this or indeed whether the tick should be replaced with a cross or the item should be removed from the table altogether.

3942:

Queer Theory is what we use in hermeneutics; it is close to Deconstruction. Queer Studies is a broader approach, it looks at queer lives as well; it is closer to sociology/history perhaps.

2452:

Just a reminder that your project is subscribed to Article alerts, but you aren't giving any link to the alerts, losing pretty much all benefit of subscription. You can find the alerts at

3083:

Have been created and, IMHO, fluffed up with content that may belong better on the regular transmen and transwomen articles with the actual content regarding sexual attraction merged to

909:

has gone through 5 times unsuccessfully - large abstract concepts tend to be more difficult). As soon as I add a bit about literature and lesbians in Asia, I'm going to nominate at GA.

2194:

easier to maintain and source if it's just one big master list. I don't know if it has been mentioned, but the separate bisexual list is probably better off usurped into the main list.

535: 3029: 2370: 1585:

gay-themed would have to be added back in individually to cat:Gay novels. (Assuming cat:Gay novels is actually meant to be only for gay-themed novels, this is kind of a mess) Thanks,

1411:

Anyone know of this organization? I started the article yesterday; it would be great to see it develop. It would be especially useful if anyone knows whether it's still operative. It

2090:

they're always going to be fraught (for the reasons discussed above), the combined list should remain also. So, it serves readers to have both comprehensive and finer-grained lists.

4035:

I think both articles are misleading, and don't make the distinction between Queer theory being a type of critical theory and Queer studies including history/sociology/anthropology

3921: 958:. Is this something we would like to do as well. That way we can go from getting an article as an A-class and then to a FA-class instead of going from GA-class and then FA-class. -- 4277:

Some editors want to remove the word gay. If anyone has opinions on the removal of the word gay from the show's premise, chime in on the article's talk page please. Thank you. --

3800:

and put in the most sibling cat possible. As it becomes too large it can be divided. The list is a different issue but if they have an article would certainly seem to make sense.

4019:

The lead is actually misleading. Gay and lesbian Studies are the forefathers of Queer Studies, just as we had Gay Theory before Queer Theory. Lesbian Theory is Lesbian Feminism.

2566:

Ah, that sounds good. It's possibly just a question of my not having taken long enough to familiarize myself with this stuff when I joined the project. Ah well! I'll know now.

951: 585:

because it is quite a first, though some might say a dubious one. From the sounds of it, Ugo Gabriele might be a cross-dresser; however, keeping with our policies such as

108: 94: 86: 81: 69: 64: 59: 3785:

Agree with creating the cat if there are enough. If not, then maybe "LGBT writers by continent" cats can be made?. Also if they have reliable sources, adding them to the

4336:

I added unsourced tag to it. I really think it should be AfD'ed as non-notable. Apparently over the years, others think so as well from reading the article's talk page.

2453: 3290:

article people have mentioned the pejorative uses of the word, though used in a matter of ageism whereas what I am referring to here would be sexism or sexualityism.

1581:

is it for all novels by gay authors regardless of theme). (Additionally, if the author sub-categories are removed from cat:Gay novels, their individual novels which

803:

Thanks for working on that (and for setting me straight about the outcome - I had thought it was being discouraged entirely which is why I didn't touch it anymore).

4235:

point to and redirect so the navbox works for them all. Standardizing is another issue which I would look to the non-lgbt history year-in articles for suggestions.

265:

for Gay Men's Debut Fiction and Gay Men's Fiction. Is anyone else interested in writing a draft? He probably deserves his own page; he also wrote plays directed by

4268: 4103:

is a source for it if someone wants to add it. I'm not very good at doing the actual editing bit but I don't mind finding sources for stuff if people need it.

2880:

taging all politicians that have ever voted for or against any marriage bill, as they have more impact on the LGBT community than this non-notable organisation.

1387: 589:, we have to go on media reports, which have branded Gabriele aka "Kitty" as Trans. Somewhere in our sexuality pages this belongs. Can other eyes weigh in? -- 2025:

I think it is a bad idea. It is sometimes very difficult to be sure if a person is Bi compared to G or L. The combined list could allow for such ambiguity. Is

3480: 2007: 2635:

Leaving a note here in case any other editors want to review this decision (rather than it being a surprise & getting complaints on my talk page lol).

3145:

The creator of the later 3 seems to have made them based on precedent from the first, so maybe they will understand the need for merign anyway? -Unsigned

2104:

This seems like it would create double-work for editors, but as long as the people maintaining these particular lists aren't complaining... have at it --

1889:

Collaboration was never changed after January... any nominations for March? ( the COTM instructions call for ad-hoc nominations, so I am ad-hoccing :-D )

2672: 1516:

father) finds Buddha and so the curse is removed. As a result of this, the pregnant tomboy becomes female in her mind, and the effeminate man becomes a

3760:

Are there a lot with articles? I'm not sure of any hard rules but if there are a dozen or more i would consider starting a subcategory of LGBT writers.

3979:

In a nutshell, yes. Though 'text' in the postmodern sense - also music, painting, etc. We sometimes theorise from Queer Studies texts though - as when

3679:

or may not have made these connections, but certainly others have gotten the connections from his writings. As such, they belong in the article about

4261: 4133:

I also updated the same-sex marriage claim using your source. Though in the future, bringing it up on the article's talk page works just as well :)

2530:

I comemnted at the FT candidacy because I saw your comment here, Yobmod - are those article alerts the place to look for further tasks like this?

2210: 1999: 47: 17: 2883:

Is fine if someone wants to add it back, but it seems inconsistant to me. Should we also tag any celebrity that speaks out against gay marriage?

3099: 913: 126:

IMO, a single line (and kind of a throw-away line at than), where the person in question isn't really discussed at all - that doesn't meet the

3518: 1483:

tells the tale of a brother who lives as a woman and his sister who lives as a man, who eventually swap places in order to lead happy lives?"

1279: 1263: 1199: 1183: 614: 3473: 4092:

page and saw that there is a table there stating that MSM in Sweden can give blood. This is definitely not true (I have a Swedish language

2653: 1247: 4199:

We need a new navbox that points to the articles, rather than the yearly redirects (see 1950's in LGBT rights for the current nav table).

2863:. This one was in our project, but someone (I forget who, but I don't think it was a project member) removed our tag from the talk page. 2299:

That seems very, er, authoritarian - since when did I have the right to make decisions or speak for a project? Just ask everyone else...

1604:

makes it unsuitable to be added to all novels by LGBT authors, since it refers to "a novel with a lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender

1475:

Awesome article, fascinating subject. For the DYK, I think a fairly high-level overview hook would be good; something like: "...that the

2661: 1848: 1231: 332: 1438:

strike anyone as DYK-worthy? I'd like to nominate it, but I'm a bit concerned it might be too salacious for the front page. Thanks! --

950:

I don't know if anyone noticed this or not, but there is discussion about A-class articles being a higher grade then GA-class articles

3372: 3028:

And here's another AFD of interest, nommed for AFD by the same user who brought American College of Pediatricians to deletion review:

1383: 1135: 1382:

The LGBT project does not appear to have any articles currently assessed as A-class. And when it did, there were about 7 or 8. See:

1323: 1215: 1167: 1151: 617:

going on with Alisa Valdes-Rodriguez denying her history and making things up on her Knowledge biography. The blog post has led to

3487: 2600:

Awesome, thanks! Well, if the discussion below bears fruit, maybe someone else can help me fix it up a bit per your suggestions :)

323: 3443: 1831: 1824: 1577: 3466: 3235: 2292: 1294: 1087: 1064: 1041: 2476: 1119: 1103: 840: 235:

Members of WP:Anime want to discuss on whatever Erika's Friedman manga & anime reviews are RS. The discussion is here

4175: 3611: 3208: 3077: 2460: 1720:

some to the seemingly-more-relevent WikiProject:Pornography, but was reverted on 1 & so am asking for clarification.

700: 549: 141: 3432:

Google doesn't know anything you could call "scholarly" on this issue, but there are some partially developed ideas, see

4218: 4099:

Oh, and there was a citation needed tag attached to a statement about Sweden getting gay marriage on May 1st this year.

2033:(who identifies as gay, but had children and a wife). Ig the lists are competely split, how will ambguiuty be addressed? 1840: 1356: 401: 1908:? After all the work Moni3 put in, would be nice to get a bunch of apple polishing done and improve it's FA chances. 3213: 3198: 3072: 3067: 2006:, and splitting what remains into separate Gay men and Lesbian lists. Discussion thread if you have an opinion is at 470: 493: 3920:

Thanks. Queer studies/theory isn't quite my field, and so both the articles seem impenetrable to me. Also, in the

3399: 3223: 3125: 3084: 1851:

being a quickly browsable list of laws around the world, without having to read prose). thoughts or ideas?........

516: 424: 392: 378: 38: 3924:, there was some discussion about which link to use, to queer theory or queer studies. Currently the link in the 2644:

action had been taken, & it seemed to be the logical solution). Feel free to revert or revise as needed. Thx,

2183: 1817: 1733: 1713: 4271:

over how the show's premise is described. Apparently, someone has taken offense to the section starting off as:

4185:

is not needed, as worldwide there must be enough information for these time periods, they all of them still need

3203: 3062: 2304: 649: 566: 355: 171: 4379: 4351: 4330: 4301: 4286: 4251: 4160: 4142: 4128: 4112: 4064: 4050: 4028: 4014: 3996: 3973: 3951: 3937: 3907: 3893: 3870: 3835: 3816: 3776: 3754: 3745:

after adding a reference that she's a lesbian feminist. I notice there is no Category:LGBT writers from India...

3730: 3696: 3653: 3615: 3559: 3526: 3505: 3455: 3427: 3411: 3345: 3315: 3299: 3254: 3178: 3157: 3140: 3118: 3047: 3022: 2984: 2965: 2939: 2923: 2897: 2873: 2854: 2823: 2808: 2791: 2775: 2760: 2744: 2721: 2704: 2691: 2609: 2595: 2575: 2561: 2539: 2519: 2501: 2485: 2439: 2416: 2401: 2382: 2362: 2330: 2308: 2237: 2222: 2203: 2177: 2162: 2130: 2113: 2099: 2080: 2058: 2044: 2019: 1988: 1959: 1938: 1917: 1898: 1878: 1860: 1795: 1774: 1760: 1684: 1662: 1642: 1617: 1594: 1555: 1529: 1502: 1470: 1453:

I'll take a look and see if anything looks hooky, but I'd say don't worry about salacity - we're supposed to be

1447: 1424: 1399: 1002: 983: 967: 940: 925: 890: 871: 813: 798: 770: 721: 706: 682: 653: 632: 600: 570: 555: 461: 306: 278: 243: 226: 199: 162: 147: 120: 4182: 3607: 3522: 3386: 3368: 2446: 2153:

Withdrawing split proposal, is unlikely to go any further (based on comments here & on article talk). Thx,

1601: 1035: 484: 447: 507: 415: 369: 3446:

for these kinds of characters. I think this new category would fall under the scope of this WikiProject. --

4100: 3333: 3153: 2003: 1457:

after all, and the worst the DYK guys can say is no. Of course, my view's coloured by having just nominated

1058: 346: 1330: 3635:

Although Baum never intended ____ transgender activists and literary scholars have interpreted it that way

3091: 1435: 780: 743: 606: 438: 3877:

with queer studies about the field and theory about ... theories. I've cleaned up the studies one a bit.

1572: 1314: 1286: 1270: 1206: 1190: 834: 667: 4089: 3797: 1454: 1254: 906: 867: 262: 250: 1238: 4214: 3928:

article goes ], as the articles were deemed mainly the same, but queer theory went into more depth. --

1142: 847: 4206: 4156: 4108: 3786: 3451: 3407: 2819: 2740: 2649: 2497: 2466:

template located at the bottom of your project's mainpage. You can find some additional paraments at

2456:(you can transclude it anywhere you want), or you can simply remove the display=none option from the 2412: 2378: 2218: 2158: 2109: 2054: 2015: 1984: 1955: 1934: 1913: 1894: 1856: 1839:). If it can't be brought up to standards as a stand-alone list, it could be merged elsewhere -- but 1770: 1729: 1709: 1590: 1222: 1174: 1158: 645: 626: 594: 292:

exists, and is completely unsourced. Are there other occupation lists like this? Doesn't the general

289: 222: 3861:... would I end up with egg on my face if I proposed a merge? They seem awfully similar to me... -- 3191:

A multiple merge discussion has been started to address the possible merger of usable material from:

2371:

Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 February 28#WP:HOMO → Knowledge:WikiProject LGBT studies

4297: 4060: 4024: 4010: 3992: 3969: 3947: 3933: 3903: 3866: 3750: 3423: 3326: 2605: 2571: 2535: 2353:

Shortcut and redirect deleted as a result of the RfD which was closed as delete on 8 March 2009. —

2182:

And even in contemporary culture, recently there's been a whole slew of women who self-identify as

2095: 1551: 1525: 1498: 1466: 1443: 1420: 1300: 1094: 1071: 1048: 963: 293: 274: 4361: 3383:. I think transgender children have a tendency to identify strongly with this character, as well. 2949:

politician pages their votes on LGBT issues aren't that important and thus aren't even mentioned.

2002:(currently a 19-part list), proposing moving all Bisexual listings to the already-existing 4-part 1126: 1110: 4364: 4315: 4282: 4236: 4210: 3878: 3801: 3761: 3715: 3638: 3490: 3439: 3356: 3239: 3163: 3149: 3103: 2950: 2908: 2676: 2358: 2315: 2065: 1780: 1745: 1613: 1395: 792: 764: 676: 638: 116: 2581: 1632:

and see if this sounds more like a tabloid than an encyclopedia? It sure sounds that way to me.

4308: 266: 4138: 4124: 2467: 2339:

Request for project eyes/opinions: Redirect for discussion: WP:HOMO redirecting to our project

2283: 2233: 2199: 1658: 886: 696: 545: 236: 186: 158: 137: 3394:

as a boy and she is ignorant of her sex, which may be different from transgender experience.

1628:

I need some others opinions here, please. Would you all look at the personal life section of

4344: 4045: 3925: 3830: 3554: 3295: 3135: 3040: 3015: 2979: 2934: 2892: 2803: 2786: 2716: 2590: 2556: 2514: 2430: 2396: 2125: 2039: 1873: 1836: 1812: 1649: 998: 863: 302: 255: 212: 195: 1546:

Heheh. That's all clear, then. Might be worth sharpening just a little in the article too.

4152: 4104: 3742: 3692: 3447: 3403: 3341: 3311: 2871: 2852: 2815: 2773: 2758: 2736: 2645: 2493: 2408: 2374: 2214: 2186:. I've been thinking it might be more useful to categorize people as somewhere on an LGBT 2173: 2154: 2105: 2050: 2011: 1980: 1951: 1930: 1909: 1890: 1852: 1766: 1725: 1705: 1640: 1586: 979: 936: 921: 811: 747: 719: 218: 4178:). I updated the merged years, but for some reason i cannot transclude it into articles. 3714:. An article regarding LGBT themes regarding the Wizard of Oz is begging to be written. 4293: 4056: 4020: 4006: 3988: 3965: 3943: 3929: 3899: 3862: 3796:

as that seems a little illogical to what readers/researchers would utilize. Start with

3746: 3419: 3095: 2601: 2567: 2550:

Maybe it should be linked more obviously? In a box like the collaboration of the month?

2531: 2481: 2091: 1680: 1547: 1521: 1494: 1462: 1439: 1416: 959: 755: 270: 240: 4039:

queer theory. But i agree that good articles written on them would/should be seperate.

618: 4278: 3984: 3858: 3360: 2471: 2354: 2030: 1629: 1609: 1391: 787: 759: 739: 735: 731: 671: 112: 3129:

making up our own phrases to slice article content into the smallest possible parts.

4134: 4120: 4002: 3854: 2699: 2668: 2640: 2273: 2229: 2195: 2190:, unless they specifically self-identify. Oh, and re: the list(s), I think it'd be 1654: 1476: 882: 751: 691: 586: 540: 154: 132: 127: 2765:

And perhaps we need a different designation (simply "deceased members") for Jeff?

1344: 852:

3) Expand expand expand, this article has so much more to tell. Make it more like

3375:. From my perspective, Ozma physically changes sex in the book, and is therefore 1415:

to have had a website at some point, though I haven't found one extant just now.

4093: 4040: 3980: 3825: 3549: 3376: 3291: 3130: 2974: 2929: 2887: 2798: 2781: 2711: 2585: 2551: 2509: 2425: 2391: 2300: 2120: 2086:

the GLB list is sexual identity-based, and the T list is gender identity-based.

2034: 2026: 1868: 1844: 1807: 994: 562: 298: 191: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1412: 786:- please have a look and see whether the wording is appropriate or needs work! 3688: 3337: 3307: 3231: 2864: 2845: 2766: 2751: 2169: 1633: 1458: 1405: 975: 932: 917: 804: 712: 182: 1975:— no additional noms or votes as of start of month, changed collaboration to 954:. Basically the A-class articles are assesed by Wikiproject. For example see 1676: 3540:

to real world phenomena is not important, unless sources have discussed it.

1950:, though would lean toward Lesbian because of the FA reason you mentioned. 993:

another place to list articles in a queue, which we already have enough of.

3687:

and a gender-changing character that is a symbol for transgender folks. --

3148:

I'd be very tempted to simply replace all 4 articles with redirects. :) --

288:

While mooching with the LGBT fiction template i made, i noticed that this

3227: 1600:

I know nothing about the category; I was just concerned that the text of

860: 2814:

point, maybe a hidden comment would be needed next to his name though).

2369:

One of the redirects for this project, WP:HOMO, is up for discussion at

1976: 1905: 1671:

WP:AfD:Midwest_Bisexual_Lesbian Gay Transgender_Ally_College_Conference

897: 878: 853: 742:

was. In my stub sorting, for instance, I've removed the LGBT-stub from

1867:

don't think the Bot will be able to do anything with a tabulated list.

3602: 2842:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Non-monogamous heterosexual marriage

3433: 3270: 2636: 2547:

deletion/merge nominations for the many year in LGBT rights stubs.

4202:

They need a standarised format and a proper, context-giving lead.

3683:. I see no difference between the (unintended?) symbolism in the 3587:

for Ozma being transgender, nor for her as a medical transsexual.

2861:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/American College of Pediatricians

2675:. Any ideas or advice? I'm really sick of having images deleted. 3438:

A character who arguably falls on the other side of the line is

3398:

transgender. Note that this could also affect her inclusion in

3380: 3287: 3278: 3543:

If it is put in the trans cateogry, the scope of that category

3162:

It would get more messy I'm afraid although that is an option.

1926:

for that matter? I note that a call for help was issued above

1739:

First off, the article I restored it to was the same one where

3274: 3266: 1923: 1806:

we have tagged them all, unless they actually identy as LGBT).

823: 25: 3327:

DOMA as an excuse not to give benefits to same sex partners.

2291:

on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at

4274:

The series follows the lives of five gay men living in ...

3364: 2886:

Hopefully the prod stands though, so this one will be moot.

2064:

an effort to ensure each list referred to the other lists.

2008:

Talk:List of gay, lesbian or bisexual people#Split proposal

1927: 738:

was given an LGBT-stub, but far less so if someone like

621:

for us about our diligence, policies and guidelines. --

3606:

model for everybody, not just one particular group. --

3030:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Murray Hill (performer)

582: 522: 519: 513: 499: 496: 490: 476: 473: 467: 453: 450: 444: 430: 427: 421: 407: 404: 398: 384: 381: 375: 361: 358: 352: 338: 335: 329: 3236:

Talk:Gynephilia and androphilia#Multi Merge discussion

3058:

OK, sit down for this one. Not one but four articles:

2049:

Liked your proposal better, replied on the talk page.

1520:

man among men - marrying three women to prove it. --

734:

discussion, it makes sense if a stub on someone like

2584:

article at reqs for assessment (finally!) Good work!

881:. Makes other articles look sucky by comparison. ;) 2990:

anti-abortion, anti-LGBT in some profound way, etc.

1847:because of that quick-and-dirty appeal (similar to 1013: 3336:. I will write you... (or someone else should). -- 4360:Hmmm, on the fence. The website does seem notable 4005:, linking it to hermeneutics. Hope this is ok. -- 2454:Knowledge:WikiProject LGBT studies/Article alerts 1690:Question: Re LGBT project tags on porn star bio's 2262:Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new 2840:Members of this project may wish to comment at 2527:Nevermind, both passed anyway - yey! -Unsigned 261:I've just finished this novel. It got the 2006 3261:LGBT references in gender/sex-related articles 2667:(sigh) Yet another image deletion discussion. 284:BLP violation/redundant?: List of LGBT writers 215:(includes link to WP:LGBT-relevent discussion) 4269:Talk:Queer as Folk (North American TV series) 2730:Flush inactives list? (except for number 120) 1461:for DYK - let's see if that gets anywhere :D 1388:Knowledge:WikiProject LGBT studies/Assessment 1384:Knowledge:WikiProject LGBT studies#Assessment 324:Category:LGBT people by political orientation 8: 4314:And you thought gay gas was from lite beer? 4193:Most of the articles are completely uncited. 3444:Category:Fictional characters who change sex 1832:List of terms for gay in different languages 1825:List of terms for gay in different languages 205:Erika Friedman (moved from Portal talk:LGBT) 3226:with any remaining material likely sent to 1648:It seems to have some tone issues, and per 613:I recently blogged about the "bisexuality" 4181:Although i think further merging into the 3355:There is some discussion going on over at 3090:IMHO, this is more POV creep/fallout from 1010: 211:The following message was moved here from 3674:A controversial view of symbolism in the 3482:L. Frank Baum, creator of Oz: A Biography 3402:and significance in this WikiProject. -- 609:issues turn into good press for Knowledge 577:Transsexual mafia capo arrested in Naples 237:Talk:Yuri_(genre)#Erika_Friedman_RS_Redux 4262:Queer as Folk (North American TV series) 3486:. Google Scholar also shows some promise 2750:I guess? Or move it to a separate page? 2492:does (and were empty currently anyway). 1033: 839:2) Move pejorative high school usage to 2264:WikiProject coordinators' working group 2000:List of gay, lesbian or bisexual people 877:Hehe, Moni3 did too good of a job with 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject LGBT studies 3100:Blanchard, Bailey, and Lawrence theory 3032:. This is an article for a drag king. 1568:Question about scope of cat:Gay novels 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4363:and there are some book links to it. 4001:I've added a sentence to the lead of 1056: 841:Gay (Pejorative non-sexualized usage) 7: 1994:Split proposal of List of GLB people 1081: 1079: 312:LGBT people by political orientation 2662:file:Frontiers_Aug_1_2006_cover.jpg 2580:btw, i rated and commented on your 1849:LGBT rights by country or territory 1608:", which is not always the case... 1576:(without gay themes). Also removed 581:This is quite an astounding story. 190:me what i'm doing wrong? Anybody..? 4292:*boggles* Thanks for the headsup. 3373:Category:Fictional LGBT characters 776:I've made an attempt at rewording 666:I've been sifting through some of 24: 4267:Howdy! There is a discussion at 3322:Oh DOMA... how we have missed you 561:...Oscar Wilde was an anarchist? 3983:draws upon a 1950s article from 3737:Category:LGBT writers from India 3234:. Discussion is taking place at 2344: 1966: 1704:self-reverted edits in question 1695: 1578:Category:Novels by Samuel Delany 1080: 1057: 1034: 181:Also, has anyone ever been to a 29: 3238:and your input is appreciated. 4081:Blood giving in Sweden for MSM 3470:By Alan C. Elms, pages 143-148 185:? I'm starting to work it and 1: 4176:Table of years in LGBT rights 3209:Transwomen attracted to women 3078:Transwomen attracted to women 2293:05:50, 28 February 2009 (UTC) 2020:07:33, 27 February 2009 (UTC) 1960:07:33, 27 February 2009 (UTC) 1939:04:32, 27 February 2009 (UTC) 1918:04:29, 27 February 2009 (UTC) 1899:23:39, 26 February 2009 (UTC) 1885:March collaboration of month? 1861:23:36, 26 February 2009 (UTC) 1685:20:00, 22 February 2009 (UTC) 1663:20:29, 22 February 2009 (UTC) 1643:19:54, 22 February 2009 (UTC) 1618:00:26, 21 February 2009 (UTC) 1595:00:14, 21 February 2009 (UTC) 1556:13:47, 19 February 2009 (UTC) 1530:13:26, 19 February 2009 (UTC) 1503:12:50, 19 February 2009 (UTC) 1471:12:37, 19 February 2009 (UTC) 1448:12:34, 19 February 2009 (UTC) 1434:Does anything in the article 1425:09:45, 18 February 2009 (UTC) 1400:21:48, 18 February 2009 (UTC) 1003:09:45, 14 February 2009 (UTC) 984:18:09, 13 February 2009 (UTC) 968:17:50, 13 February 2009 (UTC) 941:18:01, 18 February 2009 (UTC) 926:16:31, 13 February 2009 (UTC) 891:14:08, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 872:21:44, 15 February 2009 (UTC) 814:16:36, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 799:00:03, 15 February 2009 (UTC) 771:23:39, 14 February 2009 (UTC) 722:21:55, 14 February 2009 (UTC) 707:21:20, 14 February 2009 (UTC) 683:23:50, 13 February 2009 (UTC) 654:05:24, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 633:04:53, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 601:17:02, 15 February 2009 (UTC) 571:14:49, 15 February 2009 (UTC) 556:22:12, 14 February 2009 (UTC) 534:are all up for discussion at 393:Category:LGBT anti-communists 307:09:49, 14 February 2009 (UTC) 279:20:50, 13 February 2009 (UTC) 244:18:33, 13 February 2009 (UTC) 227:20:49, 13 February 2009 (UTC) 200:09:33, 13 February 2009 (UTC) 163:00:16, 13 February 2009 (UTC) 148:05:15, 12 February 2009 (UTC) 121:22:35, 11 February 2009 (UTC) 4196:Most have a US/western bias. 2257: 1841:Terminology of homosexuality 956:Military History WikiProject 846:1x) OR move both of them to 583:I included it on Transsexual 4055:Yes, I would agree on that. 3214:Transwomen attracted to men 3199:Transmen attracted to women 3073:Transwomen attracted to men 3068:Transmen attracted to women 2461:ArticleAlertbotSubscription 2258:Coordinators' working group 644:Please help deorphan this. 615:bizarreness and shenanigans 4398: 4380:06:36, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 4352:04:44, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 4331:04:25, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 4302:17:38, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 4287:17:31, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 4252:09:16, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 4161:19:42, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 4143:19:02, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 4129:18:55, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 4113:18:34, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 4088:Was just checking out the 4065:08:13, 19 March 2009 (UTC) 4051:08:59, 18 March 2009 (UTC) 4029:21:19, 16 March 2009 (UTC) 4015:20:25, 16 March 2009 (UTC) 3997:06:24, 16 March 2009 (UTC) 3974:00:19, 16 March 2009 (UTC) 3952:22:58, 15 March 2009 (UTC) 3938:20:18, 15 March 2009 (UTC) 3908:14:50, 15 March 2009 (UTC) 3894:14:42, 15 March 2009 (UTC) 3871:11:22, 15 March 2009 (UTC) 3836:11:01, 18 March 2009 (UTC) 3817:08:55, 18 March 2009 (UTC) 3777:02:48, 18 March 2009 (UTC) 3755:16:22, 17 March 2009 (UTC) 3731:02:46, 18 March 2009 (UTC) 3697:15:05, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 3654:14:31, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 3618:18:08, 12 March 2009 (UTC) 3616:18:08, 12 March 2009 (UTC) 3560:10:38, 12 March 2009 (UTC) 3527:04:33, 12 March 2009 (UTC) 3506:01:37, 12 March 2009 (UTC) 3456:00:28, 12 March 2009 (UTC) 3428:20:13, 11 March 2009 (UTC) 3412:19:03, 11 March 2009 (UTC) 3400:List of transgender people 3346:15:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 3316:14:03, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 3300:13:52, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 3265:Currently the articles on 3255:03:25, 14 March 2009 (UTC) 3224:gynephilia and androphilia 3179:03:25, 14 March 2009 (UTC) 3158:13:38, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 3141:10:28, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 3126:Gynephilia and androphilia 3119:10:23, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 3085:Gynephilia and androphilia 3048:10:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 3023:10:37, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 2985:10:38, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 2966:10:26, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 2940:10:21, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 2924:10:09, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 2898:07:39, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 2874:03:57, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 2855:03:24, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 2824:09:54, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 2809:09:13, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 2792:07:33, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 2776:03:16, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 2761:03:13, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 2745:01:52, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 2722:11:13, 12 March 2009 (UTC) 2705:01:53, 12 March 2009 (UTC) 2692:23:15, 11 March 2009 (UTC) 2655:20:02, 11 March 2009 (UTC) 2610:10:10, 11 March 2009 (UTC) 2596:09:48, 11 March 2009 (UTC) 2576:09:27, 11 March 2009 (UTC) 2562:07:40, 11 March 2009 (UTC) 2540:14:11, 10 March 2009 (UTC) 2342: 2331:03:32, 10 March 2009 (UTC) 1818:11:28, 12 March 2009 (UTC) 1796:22:19, 11 March 2009 (UTC) 1775:21:43, 11 March 2009 (UTC) 1761:21:32, 11 March 2009 (UTC) 1734:20:49, 11 March 2009 (UTC) 1714:06:46, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 1693: 462:Category:LGBT libertarians 107:Still hoping for input on 3898:They're different things. 3204:Transmen attracted to men 3063:Transmen attracted to men 2836:AfDs of possible interest 2520:10:02, 6 March 2009 (UTC) 2502:14:55, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 2486:08:55, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 2440:12:45, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 2417:11:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 2402:10:39, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 2383:05:08, 1 March 2009 (UTC) 2363:06:02, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 2309:23:26, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 2238:16:17, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 2223:15:44, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 2204:15:09, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 2178:14:52, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 2163:14:06, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 2131:16:15, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 2114:15:44, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 2100:14:27, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 2081:05:10, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 2059:11:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 2045:10:43, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 1989:00:32, 1 March 2009 (UTC) 1879:16:11, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 1371: 1363: 1351: 1018: 833:1) Move historic uses to 485:Category:LGBT monarchists 172:Gaylactic Spectrum Awards 4183:Timeline of LGBT history 3922:FAC for Romeo and Juliet 3387:User:Scottandrewhutchins 3369:The Marvelous Land of Oz 3367:character starting from 1602:Template:LGBT-novel-stub 508:Category:LGBT socialists 416:Category:LGBT communists 370:Category:LGBT anarchists 2660:Help on image deletion 2004:List of bisexual people 3484:By Katharine M. Rogers 3351:Is Princess Ozma LGBT? 3092:Homosexual transsexual 2468:WP:AAlerts#Subscribing 2211:the phonebook approach 1779:FWIW, I think it can! 1481:Torikaebaya Monogatari 1436:Torikaebaya Monogatari 1014:LGBT pages by quality 744:Rupert Charles Barneby 607:Alisa Valdes-Rodriguez 347:Category:Gay neo-Nazis 263:Lambda Literary Awards 4090:LGBT rights in Sweden 3850:Queer theory/studies? 3798:Category:LGBT writers 2859:There's another one: 907:Roman Catholic Church 42:of past discussions. 4169:LGBT rights timeline 3787:List of LGBT writers 3477:By Sherrie A. Inness 1823:Rescue potential of 1653:quite encyclopedic. 1624:Is this WikiTabloid? 619:some very good press 439:Category:LGBT Greens 290:List of LGBT writers 3608:Scottandrewhutchins 1573:Category:Gay novels 905:to get it through ( 835:Gay (historic uses) 668:Category:LGBT stubs 646:Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) 294:list of LGBT people 4347: 3475:The Lesbian Menace 3357:Talk:Princess Ozma 3054:More drama anyone? 3043: 3018: 2654:GayVN_Awards": --> 1948:Support either one 639:Bad Girrls Studios 130:criteria. IMO. -- 4343: 4223: 4209:comment added by 3039: 3014: 2295: 2289: 1379: 1378: 912:You can find the 861:Talk:Gay#Proposal 795: 767: 750:, but left it on 704: 679: 553: 187:Gaylactic Network 145: 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 4389: 4376: 4370: 4350: 4342: 4327: 4321: 4248: 4242: 4222: 4203: 3926:Romeo and Juliet 3890: 3884: 3813: 3807: 3773: 3767: 3727: 3721: 3650: 3644: 3502: 3496: 3468:Uncovering Lives 3251: 3245: 3175: 3169: 3115: 3109: 3046: 3038: 3021: 3013: 2962: 2956: 2920: 2914: 2702: 2688: 2682: 2465: 2459: 2437: 2428: 2365: 2348: 2347: 2327: 2321: 2286: 2281: 2278: 2271: 2077: 2071: 1974: 1970: 1969: 1792: 1786: 1757: 1751: 1716: 1699: 1698: 1368: 1359: 1353:WikiWork factors 1085: 1084: 1083: 1062: 1061: 1039: 1038: 1011: 946:A-class articles 914:peer review here 848:Gay (other uses) 793: 785: 779: 765: 705: 694: 677: 629: 624: 597: 592: 554: 543: 526: 510: 503: 487: 480: 464: 457: 441: 434: 418: 411: 395: 388: 372: 365: 349: 342: 326: 256:Robert Westfield 213:Portal talk:LGBT 146: 135: 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4397: 4396: 4392: 4391: 4390: 4388: 4387: 4386: 4374: 4368: 4348: 4340: 4325: 4319: 4312: 4275: 4265: 4246: 4240: 4204: 4171: 4083: 3888: 3882: 3852: 3811: 3805: 3771: 3765: 3743:Suniti Namjoshi 3739: 3725: 3719: 3648: 3642: 3519:172.130.193.192 3500: 3494: 3353: 3329:Thanks, Obama! 3324: 3263: 3249: 3243: 3173: 3167: 3113: 3107: 3098:which are from 3056: 3044: 3036: 3019: 3011: 2960: 2954: 2918: 2912: 2838: 2732: 2700: 2686: 2680: 2665: 2633: 2479: 2463: 2457: 2450: 2431: 2426: 2366: 2352: 2350: 2345: 2341: 2325: 2319: 2284: 2274: 2260: 2075: 2069: 1996: 1967: 1965: 1887: 1829: 1790: 1784: 1755: 1749: 1717: 1703: 1701: 1696: 1692: 1689: 1674: 1626: 1570: 1479:Japanese story 1432: 1409: 1380: 1366: 1357: 948: 902: 828: 783: 777: 748:Lisa A. Barnett 690: 661: 659:Stubs follow-up 642: 627: 622: 611: 595: 590: 579: 539: 511: 506: 488: 483: 465: 460: 442: 437: 419: 414: 396: 391: 373: 368: 350: 345: 327: 322: 316:The categories 314: 286: 259: 207: 175: 131: 105: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4395: 4393: 4385: 4384: 4383: 4382: 4355: 4354: 4311: 4306: 4305: 4304: 4273: 4264: 4258: 4257: 4256: 4255: 4254: 4225: 4224: 4200: 4197: 4194: 4170: 4167: 4166: 4165: 4164: 4163: 4146: 4145: 4131: 4082: 4079: 4078: 4077: 4076: 4075: 4074: 4073: 4072: 4071: 4070: 4069: 4068: 4067: 3961: 3960: 3959: 3958: 3957: 3956: 3955: 3954: 3913: 3912: 3911: 3910: 3851: 3848: 3847: 3846: 3845: 3844: 3843: 3842: 3841: 3840: 3839: 3838: 3792:I wouldn't go 3780: 3779: 3741:I just tagged 3738: 3735: 3734: 3733: 3708: 3707: 3706: 3705: 3704: 3703: 3702: 3701: 3700: 3699: 3663: 3662: 3661: 3660: 3659: 3658: 3657: 3656: 3624: 3623: 3622: 3621: 3620: 3619: 3593: 3592: 3591: 3590: 3589: 3588: 3579: 3578: 3577: 3576: 3575: 3574: 3565: 3564: 3563: 3562: 3541: 3534: 3533: 3532: 3531: 3530: 3529: 3509: 3508: 3461: 3460: 3459: 3458: 3436: 3352: 3349: 3323: 3320: 3319: 3318: 3262: 3259: 3258: 3257: 3219: 3218: 3217: 3216: 3211: 3206: 3201: 3193: 3192: 3188: 3187: 3186: 3185: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3096:Autogynephilia 3081: 3080: 3075: 3070: 3065: 3055: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3004: 3003: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2991: 2901: 2900: 2884: 2881: 2837: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2794: 2731: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2664: 2658: 2632: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2620: 2619: 2618: 2617: 2616: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2548: 2505: 2504: 2475: 2449: 2447:Article alerts 2444: 2443: 2442: 2421: 2420: 2419: 2386: 2385: 2343: 2340: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2272:Delievered by 2259: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2102: 2029:Bi or gay? Or 1995: 1992: 1963: 1962: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1922:Or what about 1886: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1828: 1821: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1694: 1691: 1688: 1673: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1625: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1569: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1431: 1428: 1408: 1403: 1377: 1376: 1370: 1362: 1349: 1348: 1341: 1335: 1334: 1327: 1319: 1318: 1311: 1305: 1304: 1297: 1291: 1290: 1283: 1275: 1274: 1267: 1259: 1258: 1251: 1243: 1242: 1235: 1227: 1226: 1219: 1211: 1210: 1203: 1195: 1194: 1187: 1179: 1178: 1171: 1163: 1162: 1155: 1147: 1146: 1139: 1131: 1130: 1123: 1115: 1114: 1107: 1099: 1098: 1091: 1076: 1075: 1068: 1053: 1052: 1045: 1030: 1029: 1023: 1022: 1016: 1015: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 987: 986: 947: 944: 901: 895: 894: 893: 843:or something. 830:Things to do? 827: 820: 819: 818: 817: 816: 756:Kenneth Zeller 727: 726: 725: 724: 660: 657: 641: 636: 610: 604: 578: 575: 574: 573: 532: 531: 530: 529: 528: 527: 504: 481: 458: 435: 412: 389: 366: 313: 310: 285: 282: 258: 247: 230: 229: 206: 203: 174: 169: 168: 167: 166: 165: 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 89: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4394: 4381: 4378: 4377: 4371: 4362: 4359: 4358: 4357: 4356: 4353: 4346: 4339: 4335: 4334: 4333: 4332: 4329: 4328: 4322: 4310: 4307: 4303: 4299: 4295: 4291: 4290: 4289: 4288: 4284: 4280: 4272: 4270: 4263: 4259: 4253: 4250: 4249: 4243: 4234: 4229: 4228: 4227: 4226: 4220: 4216: 4212: 4208: 4201: 4198: 4195: 4192: 4191: 4190: 4188: 4184: 4179: 4177: 4168: 4162: 4158: 4154: 4150: 4149: 4148: 4147: 4144: 4140: 4136: 4132: 4130: 4126: 4122: 4117: 4116: 4115: 4114: 4110: 4106: 4102: 4097: 4095: 4091: 4086: 4080: 4066: 4062: 4058: 4054: 4053: 4052: 4049: 4048: 4044: 4043: 4038: 4034: 4033: 4032: 4031: 4030: 4026: 4022: 4018: 4017: 4016: 4012: 4008: 4004: 4000: 3999: 3998: 3994: 3990: 3986: 3985:Time Magazine 3982: 3978: 3977: 3976: 3975: 3971: 3967: 3953: 3949: 3945: 3941: 3940: 3939: 3935: 3931: 3927: 3923: 3919: 3918: 3917: 3916: 3915: 3914: 3909: 3905: 3901: 3897: 3896: 3895: 3892: 3891: 3885: 3875: 3874: 3873: 3872: 3868: 3864: 3860: 3859:Queer studies 3856: 3849: 3837: 3834: 3833: 3829: 3828: 3822: 3821: 3820: 3819: 3818: 3815: 3814: 3808: 3799: 3795: 3791: 3790: 3788: 3784: 3783: 3782: 3781: 3778: 3775: 3774: 3768: 3759: 3758: 3757: 3756: 3752: 3748: 3744: 3736: 3732: 3729: 3728: 3722: 3713: 3710: 3709: 3698: 3694: 3690: 3686: 3682: 3677: 3673: 3672: 3671: 3670: 3669: 3668: 3667: 3666: 3665: 3664: 3655: 3652: 3651: 3645: 3636: 3632: 3631: 3630: 3629: 3628: 3627: 3626: 3625: 3617: 3613: 3609: 3604: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3595: 3594: 3585: 3584: 3583: 3582: 3581: 3580: 3571: 3570: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3561: 3558: 3557: 3553: 3552: 3546: 3542: 3538: 3537: 3536: 3535: 3528: 3524: 3520: 3515: 3514: 3513: 3512: 3511: 3510: 3507: 3504: 3503: 3497: 3488: 3485: 3483: 3478: 3476: 3471: 3469: 3463: 3462: 3457: 3453: 3449: 3445: 3441: 3437: 3434: 3431: 3430: 3429: 3425: 3421: 3416: 3415: 3414: 3413: 3409: 3405: 3401: 3395: 3393: 3388: 3384: 3382: 3378: 3374: 3371:, belongs in 3370: 3366: 3362: 3361:Princess Ozma 3359:over whether 3358: 3350: 3348: 3347: 3343: 3339: 3335: 3330: 3328: 3321: 3317: 3313: 3309: 3304: 3303: 3302: 3301: 3297: 3293: 3289: 3283: 3280: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3260: 3256: 3253: 3252: 3246: 3237: 3233: 3229: 3225: 3221: 3220: 3215: 3212: 3210: 3207: 3205: 3202: 3200: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3190: 3189: 3180: 3177: 3176: 3170: 3161: 3160: 3159: 3155: 3151: 3150:AliceJMarkham 3147: 3146: 3144: 3143: 3142: 3139: 3138: 3134: 3133: 3127: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3120: 3117: 3116: 3110: 3101: 3097: 3093: 3088: 3086: 3079: 3076: 3074: 3071: 3069: 3066: 3064: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3053: 3049: 3042: 3035: 3031: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3017: 3010: 2988: 2987: 2986: 2983: 2982: 2978: 2977: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2968: 2967: 2964: 2963: 2957: 2948: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2938: 2937: 2933: 2932: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2922: 2921: 2915: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2899: 2896: 2895: 2891: 2890: 2885: 2882: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2872: 2870: 2869: 2868: 2862: 2857: 2856: 2853: 2851: 2850: 2849: 2843: 2835: 2825: 2821: 2817: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2807: 2806: 2802: 2801: 2797:members page. 2795: 2793: 2790: 2789: 2785: 2784: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2774: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2759: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2742: 2738: 2729: 2723: 2720: 2719: 2715: 2714: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2703: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2690: 2689: 2683: 2674: 2670: 2663: 2659: 2657: 2656: 2651: 2647: 2642: 2638: 2629: 2611: 2607: 2603: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2594: 2593: 2589: 2588: 2583: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2573: 2569: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2560: 2559: 2555: 2554: 2549: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2537: 2533: 2529: 2528: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2518: 2517: 2513: 2512: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2483: 2478: 2473: 2469: 2462: 2455: 2448: 2445: 2441: 2438: 2436: 2435: 2429: 2422: 2418: 2414: 2410: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2400: 2399: 2395: 2394: 2388: 2387: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2372: 2368: 2367: 2364: 2360: 2356: 2338: 2332: 2329: 2328: 2322: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2306: 2303:, who misses 2302: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2294: 2290: 2287: 2279: 2277: 2267: 2265: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2220: 2216: 2212: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2175: 2171: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2160: 2156: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2132: 2129: 2128: 2124: 2123: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2103: 2101: 2097: 2093: 2088: 2087: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2079: 2078: 2072: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2043: 2042: 2038: 2037: 2032: 2031:Samuel Delany 2028: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2017: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2001: 1993: 1991: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1973: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1946: 1945: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1928: 1925: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1896: 1892: 1884: 1880: 1877: 1876: 1872: 1871: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1833: 1826: 1822: 1820: 1819: 1816: 1815: 1811: 1810: 1797: 1794: 1793: 1787: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1759: 1758: 1752: 1742: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1731: 1727: 1721: 1715: 1711: 1707: 1687: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1672: 1668: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1651: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1641: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1631: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1579: 1574: 1567: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1430:possible DYK? 1429: 1427: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1407: 1404: 1402: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1375: 1369: 1360: 1354: 1350: 1347: 1346: 1342: 1340: 1337: 1336: 1333: 1332: 1328: 1326: 1325: 1321: 1320: 1317: 1316: 1312: 1310: 1307: 1306: 1303: 1302: 1298: 1296: 1293: 1292: 1289: 1288: 1284: 1282: 1281: 1277: 1276: 1273: 1272: 1268: 1266: 1265: 1261: 1260: 1257: 1256: 1252: 1250: 1249: 1245: 1244: 1241: 1240: 1236: 1234: 1233: 1229: 1228: 1225: 1224: 1220: 1218: 1217: 1213: 1212: 1209: 1208: 1204: 1202: 1201: 1197: 1196: 1193: 1192: 1188: 1186: 1185: 1181: 1180: 1177: 1176: 1172: 1170: 1169: 1165: 1164: 1161: 1160: 1156: 1154: 1153: 1149: 1148: 1145: 1144: 1140: 1138: 1137: 1133: 1132: 1129: 1128: 1124: 1122: 1121: 1117: 1116: 1113: 1112: 1108: 1106: 1105: 1101: 1100: 1097: 1096: 1092: 1090: 1089: 1078: 1077: 1074: 1073: 1069: 1067: 1066: 1060: 1055: 1054: 1051: 1050: 1046: 1044: 1043: 1037: 1032: 1031: 1028: 1025: 1024: 1021: 1017: 1012: 1004: 1000: 996: 991: 990: 989: 988: 985: 981: 977: 972: 971: 970: 969: 965: 961: 957: 953: 945: 943: 942: 938: 934: 928: 927: 923: 919: 915: 910: 908: 899: 896: 892: 888: 884: 880: 876: 875: 874: 873: 869: 865: 862: 857: 855: 850: 849: 844: 842: 837: 836: 831: 825: 821: 815: 812: 810: 809: 808: 802: 801: 800: 797: 796: 789: 782: 781:LGBT-bio-stub 775: 774: 773: 772: 769: 768: 761: 757: 753: 749: 745: 741: 740:Brian Epstein 737: 736:Brenda Howard 733: 723: 720: 718: 717: 716: 710: 709: 708: 702: 698: 693: 687: 686: 685: 684: 681: 680: 673: 669: 664: 658: 656: 655: 651: 647: 640: 637: 635: 634: 631: 630: 620: 616: 608: 605: 603: 602: 599: 598: 588: 584: 576: 572: 568: 565:, who misses 564: 560: 559: 558: 557: 551: 547: 542: 537: 524: 521: 518: 515: 509: 505: 501: 498: 495: 492: 486: 482: 478: 475: 472: 469: 463: 459: 455: 452: 449: 446: 440: 436: 432: 429: 426: 423: 417: 413: 409: 406: 403: 400: 394: 390: 386: 383: 380: 377: 371: 367: 363: 360: 357: 354: 348: 344: 343: 340: 337: 334: 331: 325: 321: 320: 319: 318: 317: 311: 309: 308: 304: 300: 295: 291: 283: 281: 280: 276: 272: 268: 264: 257: 253: 252: 248: 246: 245: 242: 238: 233: 228: 224: 220: 216: 214: 209: 208: 204: 202: 201: 197: 193: 188: 184: 179: 173: 170: 164: 160: 156: 151: 150: 149: 143: 139: 134: 129: 125: 124: 123: 122: 118: 114: 110: 102: 96: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4372: 4366: 4337: 4323: 4317: 4313: 4276: 4266: 4244: 4238: 4232: 4205:— Preceding 4186: 4180: 4172: 4098: 4087: 4084: 4046: 4041: 4036: 4003:queer theory 3962: 3886: 3880: 3855:Queer theory 3853: 3831: 3826: 3809: 3803: 3794:by continent 3793: 3769: 3763: 3740: 3723: 3717: 3711: 3685:Wizard of Oz 3684: 3681:Wizard of Oz 3680: 3676:Wizard of Oz 3675: 3646: 3640: 3634: 3555: 3550: 3544: 3498: 3492: 3481: 3474: 3467: 3396: 3391: 3385: 3354: 3331: 3325: 3284: 3264: 3247: 3241: 3171: 3165: 3136: 3131: 3111: 3105: 3089: 3082: 3057: 3033: 3008: 3005: 2980: 2975: 2958: 2952: 2946: 2935: 2930: 2916: 2910: 2893: 2888: 2866: 2865: 2858: 2847: 2846: 2839: 2804: 2799: 2787: 2782: 2768: 2767: 2753: 2752: 2733: 2717: 2712: 2684: 2678: 2669:Jeffree Star 2666: 2641:GayVN Awards 2634: 2631:GayVN Awards 2591: 2586: 2557: 2552: 2515: 2510: 2506: 2451: 2433: 2432: 2397: 2392: 2323: 2317: 2280: 2275: 2268: 2261: 2191: 2187: 2126: 2121: 2073: 2067: 2040: 2035: 1997: 1971: 1964: 1947: 1888: 1874: 1869: 1830: 1813: 1808: 1804: 1788: 1782: 1753: 1747: 1740: 1722: 1718: 1675: 1635: 1634: 1630:Aubrey O'Day 1627: 1605: 1582: 1571: 1517: 1480: 1477:Heian Period 1433: 1410: 1381: 1373: 1365: 1352: 1343: 1338: 1329: 1322: 1313: 1308: 1299: 1285: 1278: 1269: 1262: 1253: 1246: 1237: 1230: 1221: 1214: 1205: 1198: 1189: 1182: 1173: 1166: 1157: 1150: 1141: 1134: 1125: 1118: 1109: 1102: 1093: 1086: 1070: 1063: 1047: 1040: 1026: 1019: 949: 929: 916:. Thanks. -- 911: 903: 858: 851: 845: 838: 832: 829: 806: 805: 791: 763: 752:S. E. Cottam 728: 714: 713: 675: 665: 663:Hi again - 662: 643: 625: 612: 593: 580: 533: 315: 287: 260: 249: 239:. Thanks. -- 234: 231: 210: 180: 176: 106: 75: 43: 37: 4260:Premise of 3981:Lee Edelman 3377:transsexual 3124:Merging to 2630:GayVN-: --> 2027:Oscar Wilde 1904:What about 1845:Portal:LGBT 864:Phoenix of9 269:apparently. 36:This is an 4153:Intesvensk 4105:Intesvensk 4085:Hi there, 3448:Kevin Saff 3404:Kevin Saff 3232:transwomen 2816:Outsider80 2737:Outsider80 2646:Outsider80 2582:sex panic! 2494:Outsider80 2482:WP Physics 2409:Outsider80 2375:Outsider80 2215:Outsider80 2155:Outsider80 2106:Outsider80 2051:Outsider80 2012:Outsider80 2010:. Thanks, 1981:Outsider80 1952:Outsider80 1931:Scarykitty 1910:Scarykitty 1891:Outsider80 1853:Outsider80 1767:Outsider80 1726:Outsider80 1706:Outsider80 1587:Outsider80 1459:Sex Panic! 1455:uncensored 1406:Sex Panic! 1324:Unassessed 859:Check out 251:Suspension 219:Outsider80 183:Gaylaxicon 111:. Anyone? 109:this query 95:Archive 30 87:Archive 25 82:Archive 24 76:Archive 23 70:Archive 22 65:Archive 21 60:Archive 20 4309:Homokaasu 4294:Gonzonoir 4189:of work: 4057:Zigzig20s 4021:Zigzig20s 4007:Malkinann 3989:Zigzig20s 3966:Malkinann 3944:Zigzig20s 3930:Malkinann 3900:Zigzig20s 3863:Malkinann 3747:Zigzig20s 3548:category? 3420:Gonzonoir 3392:disguised 3379:and thus 3332:Someday, 2602:Gonzonoir 2568:Gonzonoir 2532:Gonzonoir 2508:supports. 2092:Gonzonoir 1837:WP:NOTDIC 1650:WP:WEIGHT 1548:Gonzonoir 1522:Malkinann 1518:masochist 1495:Gonzonoir 1463:Gonzonoir 1440:Malkinann 1417:Gonzonoir 960:Pinkkeith 900:rewritten 628:Shankbone 596:Shankbone 271:Zigzig20s 267:Marc Wolf 241:KrebMarkt 4279:TreyGeek 4219:contribs 4207:unsigned 3228:transmen 2973:project? 2907:needed. 2477:κοντριβς 2472:Headbomb 2390:remember 2355:Becksguy 2349:Resolved 2188:spectrum 2184:unlabled 1700:Resolved 1610:AnonMoos 1392:Becksguy 1309:Assessed 1280:Template 1264:Redirect 1200:Disambig 1184:Category 822:Article 788:Grutness 760:Grutness 701:contribs 672:Grutness 550:contribs 536:this CfD 142:contribs 113:Otto4711 103:TC Jones 4345:ALLST☆R 4135:Dendlai 4121:Dendlai 3712:Comment 3041:ALLST☆R 3016:ALLST☆R 2701:AniMate 2285:Disable 2276:§hepBot 2230:Siawase 2196:Siawase 1977:Lesbian 1906:Lesbian 1655:Siawase 1413:appears 1367:120,480 1248:Project 1020:Quality 898:Lesbian 883:Siawase 879:Lesbian 854:Lesbian 692:SatyrTN 541:SatyrTN 523:history 500:history 477:history 454:history 431:history 408:history 385:history 362:history 339:history 155:Siawase 133:SatyrTN 39:archive 4233:should 4211:YobMod 4151:Tack! 4094:source 3603:Jinjur 3292:Tyciol 2305:Jeffpw 2301:Dev920 2213::-D . 1345:36,715 1315:36,691 1232:Portal 1143:12,462 995:Yobmod 732:WP:SFD 567:Jeffpw 563:Dev920 299:Yobmod 192:Yobmod 4187:a lot 3689:Moni3 3440:Ranma 3363:, an 3338:Moni3 3308:Moni3 3271:woman 3222:into 2867:Aleta 2848:Aleta 2769:Aleta 2754:Aleta 2637:GayVN 2170:Moni3 1669:FYI: 1636:Aleta 1606:theme 1339:Total 1271:1,963 1191:7,801 1159:5,169 1136:Start 1127:5,213 1111:1,779 1027:Total 976:Moni3 933:Moni3 918:Moni3 826:sucks 807:Aleta 715:Aleta 623:David 591:David 587:WP:RS 538:. -- 520:links 497:links 474:links 451:links 428:links 405:links 382:links 359:links 336:links 128:WP:RS 16:< 4367:Banj 4318:Banj 4298:talk 4283:talk 4239:Banj 4215:talk 4157:talk 4139:talk 4125:talk 4109:talk 4101:Here 4061:talk 4025:talk 4011:talk 3993:talk 3970:talk 3948:talk 3934:talk 3904:talk 3881:Banj 3867:talk 3857:and 3824:now. 3804:Banj 3764:Banj 3751:talk 3718:Banj 3693:talk 3641:Banj 3612:talk 3545:must 3523:talk 3493:Banj 3479:and 3452:talk 3424:talk 3408:talk 3381:LGBT 3342:talk 3334:DOMA 3312:talk 3296:talk 3288:girl 3279:girl 3273:and 3242:Banj 3230:and 3166:Banj 3154:talk 3106:Banj 3094:and 2953:Banj 2947:most 2911:Banj 2820:talk 2741:talk 2679:Banj 2673:here 2650:talk 2639:and 2606:talk 2572:talk 2536:talk 2498:talk 2413:talk 2379:talk 2359:talk 2318:Banj 2234:talk 2219:talk 2200:talk 2192:much 2174:talk 2159:talk 2110:talk 2096:talk 2068:Banj 2055:talk 2016:talk 1985:talk 1972:Done 1956:talk 1935:talk 1914:talk 1895:talk 1857:talk 1783:Banj 1771:talk 1748:Banj 1730:talk 1710:talk 1681:talk 1677:Ikip 1659:talk 1614:talk 1591:talk 1552:talk 1526:talk 1499:talk 1467:talk 1444:talk 1421:talk 1396:talk 1386:and 1374:4.77 1372:Ω = 1364:ω = 1216:File 1168:List 1152:Stub 999:talk 980:talk 964:talk 952:here 937:talk 922:talk 887:talk 868:talk 794:wha? 766:wha? 754:and 746:and 697:talk 678:wha? 650:talk 546:talk 517:talk 514:edit 494:talk 491:edit 471:talk 468:edit 448:talk 445:edit 425:talk 422:edit 402:talk 399:edit 379:talk 376:edit 356:talk 353:edit 333:talk 330:edit 303:talk 275:talk 232:Hi, 223:talk 196:talk 159:talk 138:talk 117:talk 4365:-- 4316:-- 4237:-- 4047:Mod 4042:Yob 4037:and 3987:... 3879:-- 3832:Mod 3827:Yob 3802:-- 3762:-- 3716:-- 3639:-- 3573:FF. 3556:Mod 3551:Yob 3491:-- 3275:boy 3267:man 3240:-- 3164:-- 3137:Mod 3132:Yob 3104:-- 2981:Mod 2976:Yob 2951:-- 2936:Mod 2931:Yob 2909:-- 2894:Mod 2889:Yob 2805:Mod 2800:Yob 2788:Mod 2783:Yob 2718:Mod 2713:Yob 2710:PD. 2677:-- 2592:Mod 2587:Yob 2558:Mod 2553:Yob 2516:Mod 2511:Yob 2427:Ged 2398:Mod 2393:Yob 2316:-- 2127:Mod 2122:Yob 2119:it. 2066:-- 2041:Mod 2036:Yob 1929:. 1924:Gay 1875:Mod 1870:Yob 1814:Mod 1809:Yob 1781:-- 1746:-- 1583:are 1287:386 1223:326 1175:665 1095:595 1049:102 856:. 824:Gay 790:... 762:... 674:... 254:by 217:-- 4375:oi 4326:oi 4300:) 4285:) 4247:oi 4221:) 4217:• 4159:) 4141:) 4127:) 4111:) 4063:) 4027:) 4013:) 3995:) 3972:) 3964:-- 3950:) 3936:) 3906:) 3889:oi 3869:) 3812:oi 3789:. 3772:oi 3753:) 3726:oi 3695:) 3649:oi 3637:. 3614:) 3525:) 3501:oi 3489:. 3472:, 3454:) 3426:) 3410:) 3365:Oz 3344:) 3314:) 3298:) 3250:oi 3174:oi 3156:) 3114:oi 3087:. 2961:oi 2919:oi 2844:. 2822:) 2743:) 2687:oi 2652:) 2608:) 2574:) 2538:) 2500:) 2484:} 2480:– 2470:. 2464:}} 2458:{{ 2434:UK 2424:-- 2415:) 2381:) 2361:) 2351:– 2326:oi 2307:. 2236:) 2221:) 2202:) 2176:) 2161:) 2112:) 2098:) 2076:oi 2057:) 2018:) 1987:) 1979:. 1958:) 1937:) 1916:) 1897:) 1859:) 1791:oi 1773:) 1756:oi 1732:) 1712:) 1702:– 1683:) 1661:) 1616:) 1593:) 1554:) 1528:) 1501:) 1469:) 1446:) 1423:) 1398:) 1361:) 1331:24 1301:23 1295:NA 1255:79 1239:58 1207:33 1088:GA 1072:37 1065:FL 1042:FA 1001:) 982:) 966:) 939:) 931:-- 924:) 889:) 870:) 784:}} 778:{{ 699:/ 652:) 569:. 548:/ 305:) 277:) 225:) 198:) 161:) 140:/ 119:) 91:→ 4373:b 4369:e 4349:✰ 4341:✰ 4338:- 4324:b 4320:e 4296:( 4281:( 4245:b 4241:e 4213:( 4155:( 4137:( 4123:( 4107:( 4059:( 4023:( 4009:( 3991:( 3968:( 3946:( 3932:( 3902:( 3887:b 3883:e 3865:( 3810:b 3806:e 3770:b 3766:e 3749:( 3724:b 3720:e 3691:( 3647:b 3643:e 3610:( 3521:( 3499:b 3495:e 3450:( 3422:( 3406:( 3340:( 3310:( 3294:( 3277:/ 3269:/ 3248:b 3244:e 3172:b 3168:e 3152:( 3112:b 3108:e 3045:✰ 3037:✰ 3034:- 3020:✰ 3012:✰ 3009:- 2959:b 2955:e 2917:b 2913:e 2818:( 2739:( 2685:b 2681:e 2648:( 2604:( 2570:( 2534:( 2496:( 2474:{ 2411:( 2377:( 2357:( 2324:b 2320:e 2288:) 2282:( 2232:( 2217:( 2198:( 2172:( 2157:( 2108:( 2094:( 2074:b 2070:e 2053:( 2014:( 1983:( 1954:( 1933:( 1912:( 1893:( 1855:( 1827:? 1789:b 1785:e 1769:( 1754:b 1750:e 1741:I 1728:( 1708:( 1679:( 1657:( 1612:( 1589:( 1550:( 1524:( 1497:( 1465:( 1442:( 1419:( 1394:( 1358:? 1355:( 1120:C 1104:B 997:( 978:( 962:( 935:( 920:( 885:( 866:( 703:) 695:( 648:( 552:) 544:( 525:) 512:( 502:) 489:( 479:) 466:( 456:) 443:( 433:) 420:( 410:) 397:( 387:) 374:( 364:) 351:( 341:) 328:( 301:( 273:( 221:( 194:( 157:( 144:) 136:( 115:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:WikiProject LGBT studies/Archive 23 - Knowledge

Index