888:
factually wrong. It does have sources and references but even its opening paragraph statement feels like an OR statement and not reflective of the social understanding and usage of being sentimental. If anything it reads extremely callously and narrowly. I cannot check most of the sourcing due to being books but from the talk page, where posts are several years old, some have stated the references are taken out of context to benefit the articles perception and comments dating back 15 years that the whole thing seems to be a solo perspective diatribe. Could someone give this a gander and see if the whole thing needs an overhaul? Looking at its history this direction of the article dates back all the way to its creation and just no ones cared enough to go in depth on either the changing perception of the phrase and term, or that the article was written more as a thesis rather than a neutral philosophical document. ––
547:. The article was created by me, and since its publication in the mainspace it has been subject to the criticism of some editors. I am having a difficult time engaging with this discussion, as I have exhausted my energy to explain and quote sources while the contesting side hasnt provide a single source contradicting the current presentation or even indicated a single sentence that deserves reformulation, still, the NPOV mark has been added and have been feeling less and less capable to reach any consensus with the current quorum of the debate.
449:
214:
154:
33:
185:
82:
64:
698:
511:
92:
813:
on the narrow sense (limited to "classifying what things are good, and how good they are"). However, there would still be significant overlap and it wouldn't be clear what to do with the sources that simply treat the two terms as synonyms. An additional difficulty is that some sources reverse these
938:
That's kind of my point, it's all over the place but far and away its mostly "sentimentality is dumb and stupid" from different perspectives without really covering well as you said the ordinary word definition. Its contents neither match the philosophical argument, the novel, or the literature. I
593:
I'm posting here again to renew my request for additional opinions, as we seem to be at an impasse. The discussion has become quite lengthy, however, a key sticking point can be identified by looking for the sentence in red ("it is prohibited to..."). If interested, please take a look and let us
958:
The article appears to have been largely abandoned for several years, although it might still have active watchers. You should post to its talk page outlining your proposed overhaul. Feel free to copy your exchange here with me to that venue, which is where more detailed discussion should take
843:
I support a merge into one article. Although I believe "value theory" is the more common term today, "axiology" might be the more common search term—just because it's harder to guess its meaning. As long as there's a redirect, however, and the lead directly mentions the equivalence, I would be
887:
Hello philosophy wikiproject, just popping by because as a user came past this article and you're one of the two wikiprojects listed for it (alongside psychology) but appear the more correct forum. This article, which has been labelled for OR for about six years just read to me as wrong. Like
377:
or other core articles, with a focus on those in the worst state of disrepair. Editing can be done individually, but in the past groups have also successfully competed. There is £300 of prize money divided among editors who provide the "best additive encyclopedic value".
858:
Thanks for the feedback. I agree that the term "value theory" is more common today. This is also true for interdisciplinary works that apply the philosophical idea to other domains. I'm currently reworking the article "value theory", see
196:
750:. Before I get started, I wanted to hear what others think about the scope of these articles. Most sources seem to agree that "value theory" and "axiology" are synonyms for the same project: the study of values. For example:
817:). It would probably be better to have only one article and explain these difficulties in one paragraph in a definition section. For a short discussion on this some years ago without consensus, see
782:
If we follow this idea, there should be only one article, not two. Some sources distinguish different senses and say that the two terms are synonyms in one sense but not in another, for example:
163:
828:
If we decide to have only one article, the next question would be whether the title should be "Value theory" or "Axiology". I would slightly favor "Value theory" but both terms are common.
672:
939:
wouldn't even know where to merge the content into because the content seems more a think piece rant if anything. This may be an issue with the difference in written discourse between
578:
article (which is listed as "high-importance" in this
Project) should include a brief mention that the term "Dasein" had been used in philosophical contexts prior to Heidegger. --
418:
643:
470:
227:
422:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
266:
917:
article, however, does not appear to have a unified topic. My inclination would be to merge its contents out into those more focused articles as appropriate and turn
113:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
791:
In this sense, often synonymous with axiology (from the Greek ‘axía’, ‘value’), value theory is usually contrasted with at least two different kinds of inquiries.
477:
in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing!
911:
is an encyclopedic topic beyond what's covered there). The article also mentions a sentimental tradition in sociology, but that is not something I know about.
759:
Value theory, or axiology, concerns which things are good or bad, how good or bad they are, and, most fundamentally, what it is for a thing to be good or bad.
995:
990:
518:
504:
401:
417:
is currently a candidate for featured article status. I was hoping to get some more feedback from reviewers. The nomination page can be found at
671:
has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
642:
has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
491:
947:
which despite both words in the dictionary linking to each other one is treated positive and the other is treated negative. Ah language. ––
863:. My idea is to include all the main points of the article "Axiology" into the article "Value theory" before converting it to a redirect.
465:
380:
105:
69:
567:
170:
44:
908:
900:
352:
713:
675:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
646:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
474:
370:
364:
191:
331:
552:
544:
17:
967:
929:
849:
373:—Knowledge's most exciting contest—will take place this year from April 15 to May 31. The goal: to improve
805:
If one tried to dig into these sources, it might be possible to justify two separate articles by focusing
705:
691:
622:
50:
921:
into a redirect or disambiguation page. As an ordinary word, it's unlikely to meet notability criteria.
400:
If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core
Contest, please add or remove yourself from
184:
526:
668:
662:
595:
579:
548:
963:
925:
845:
721:
599:
583:
337:
543:
I would like to invite the participants of this project to review the current discussion around
448:
971:
953:
933:
894:
872:
853:
837:
725:
684:
655:
626:
603:
587:
556:
530:
434:
904:
868:
860:
833:
818:
430:
97:
815:
763:
786:
772:
754:
618:
333:
213:
335:
680:
651:
522:
374:
944:
918:
881:
639:
633:
153:
984:
822:
717:
484:
389:
864:
829:
806:
795:
777:
the theory of value, or
Axiology, ... the formation of axiology, or value theory...
743:
732:
712:, which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You are invited to participate in
426:
940:
571:
676:
647:
570:
process suggests that I post here to request opinions on a current dispute at
393:
385:
110:
87:
459:
800:
In this narrow sense, “value theory” is roughly synonymous with “axiology”.
768:
Axiology (or Value Theory) is the branch of philosophy that studies value.
949:
890:
810:
747:
736:
709:
611:
796:
Standford
Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry "Value Theory" (lead section)
697:
510:
463:, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the
109:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to
575:
414:
519:
Talk:Calls for the destruction of Israel#Requested move 31 July 2024
505:
Talk:Calls for the destruction of Israel#Requested move 31 July 2024
81:
63:
440:
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
536:
Independent review of the discussion in
Existential Risk Studies
338:
207:
179:
148:
26:
696:
509:
447:
439:
521:
that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.
823:
Talk:Axiology#Merge_Axiology_and_"value_theory"_entries
814:
characterizations and see axiology as the wider term (
419:
Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Ethics/archive1
773:
421:. For a short FAQ of the FA reviewing process, see
572:Talk:Dasein#Removal of wording about earlier usage
742:I was thinking about overhauling the articles
18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Philosophy/Medieval
562:Request for opinions regarding Dasein article
346:This page has archives. Sections older than
8:
58:
43:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
861:Talk:Value_theory#Changes_to_the_article
517:There is a requested move discussion at
60:
574:. The question is whether or not the
119:about philosophy content on Knowledge.
755:Oxford Handbook on Value theory, p. 1
7:
32:
30:
49:It is of interest to the following
617:Anything to do last-minute first?
194:on 21 January 2013. The result of
25:
996:NA-importance Philosophy articles
991:Project-Class Philosophy articles
903:is well-defined thing, as is the
350:may be automatically archived by
103:This page is within the scope of
212:
183:
152:
125:Knowledge:WikiProject Philosophy
90:
80:
62:
31:
844:entirely fine with either one.
764:Problems in Value Theory, p. 17
594:know your opinion, thanks. --
128:Template:WikiProject Philosophy
907:(it's not clear to me whether
661:Good article reassessment for
632:Good article reassessment for
1:
972:15:43, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
954:09:55, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
873:07:44, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
704:An editor has requested that
190:This page was nominated for
934:20:25, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
909:sentimentalism (literature)
901:Sentimentalism (philosophy)
895:11:13, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
854:20:20, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
838:11:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
726:11:37, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
685:02:17, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
656:02:12, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
627:03:13, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
604:10:34, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
588:01:40, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
557:16:21, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
200:was Withdrawn by nominator.
1012:
819:Talk:Value_theory#Axiology
531:10:12, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
492:00:05, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
384:. Cheers from the judges,
494:on behalf of the AFI team
473:to appear on Knowledge's
75:
57:
545:existential risk studies
466:Articles for improvement
435:07:25, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
809:on the broad sense and
731:Scope of the articles
701:
610:Contemplating GAR for
514:
452:
353:Lowercase sigmabot III
160:WikiProject Philosophy
106:WikiProject Philosophy
706:The Void (philosophy)
700:
692:The Void (philosophy)
513:
451:
690:Move discussion for
381:Signups are open now
165:a WikiProject Report
714:the move discussion
669:John Maynard Keynes
663:John Maynard Keynes
131:Philosophy articles
787:Value Theory, p. 6
702:
568:dispute resolution
515:
503:Requested move at
453:
116:general discussion
45:content assessment
905:sentimental novel
673:reassessment page
644:reassessment page
500:
499:
469:. The article is
457:Please note that
405:
402:the delivery list
363:Signups open for
360:
359:
204:
203:
178:
177:
147:
146:
143:
142:
139:
138:
98:Philosophy portal
16:(Redirected from
1003:
801:
792:
778:
769:
760:
490:
487:
475:Community portal
444:
443:
399:
371:The Core Contest
365:The Core Contest
355:
339:
216:
208:
187:
180:
174:on 25 July 2011.
162:was featured in
156:
149:
133:
132:
129:
126:
123:
100:
95:
94:
93:
84:
77:
76:
66:
59:
36:
35:
34:
27:
21:
1011:
1010:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1002:
1001:
1000:
981:
980:
885:
799:
790:
776:
767:
758:
740:
695:
666:
637:
615:
564:
538:
508:
495:
485:
481:
442:
411:
368:
351:
340:
334:
221:
130:
127:
124:
121:
120:
96:
91:
89:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1009:
1007:
999:
998:
993:
983:
982:
979:
978:
977:
976:
975:
974:
960:
945:sentimentality
922:
919:Sentimentality
916:
912:
884:
882:Sentimentality
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
803:
802:
793:
780:
779:
770:
761:
739:
729:
694:
688:
665:
659:
640:Batman: Anarky
636:
634:Batman: Anarky
630:
614:
608:
607:
606:
563:
560:
549:JoaquimCebuano
537:
534:
507:
501:
498:
497:
479:
478:
456:
441:
438:
410:
407:
367:
361:
358:
357:
345:
342:
341:
336:
332:
330:
327:
326:
309:
269:
223:
222:
217:
211:
202:
201:
197:the discussion
188:
176:
175:
157:
145:
144:
141:
140:
137:
136:
134:
102:
101:
85:
73:
72:
67:
55:
54:
48:
37:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1008:
997:
994:
992:
989:
988:
986:
973:
969:
965:
961:
957:
956:
955:
952:
951:
946:
942:
937:
936:
935:
931:
927:
923:
920:
914:
913:
910:
906:
902:
899:
898:
897:
896:
893:
892:
883:
880:
874:
870:
866:
862:
857:
856:
855:
851:
847:
842:
841:
840:
839:
835:
831:
826:
824:
820:
816:
812:
808:
797:
794:
788:
785:
784:
783:
774:
771:
765:
762:
756:
753:
752:
751:
749:
745:
738:
734:
730:
728:
727:
723:
719:
715:
711:
707:
699:
693:
689:
687:
686:
682:
678:
674:
670:
664:
660:
658:
657:
653:
649:
645:
641:
635:
631:
629:
628:
624:
620:
613:
609:
605:
601:
597:
592:
591:
590:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
561:
559:
558:
554:
550:
546:
541:
535:
533:
532:
528:
524:
520:
512:
506:
502:
496:
493:
489:
488:
480:Delivered by
476:
472:
468:
467:
462:
461:
450:
446:
445:
437:
436:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
409:FAC of Ethics
408:
406:
403:
397:
395:
391:
387:
383:
382:
376:
372:
366:
362:
354:
349:
344:
343:
329:
328:
325:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
229:
225:
224:
220:
215:
210:
209:
206:
199:
198:
193:
189:
186:
182:
181:
173:
172:
167:
166:
161:
158:
155:
151:
150:
135:
118:
117:
112:
108:
107:
99:
88:
86:
83:
79:
78:
74:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
42:
38:
29:
28:
19:
948:
889:
886:
827:
807:Value theory
804:
781:
744:Value theory
741:
733:Value theory
708:be moved to
703:
667:
638:
616:
565:
542:
539:
516:
483:
464:
458:
454:
413:The article
412:
398:
379:
369:
347:
226:
218:
205:
195:
169:
164:
159:
115:
114:
104:
51:WikiProjects
41:project page
40:
941:sentimental
619:Hyperbolick
985:Categories
523:RodRabelo7
122:Philosophy
111:philosophy
70:Philosophy
471:scheduled
460:Happiness
962:Cheers,
924:Cheers,
811:Axiology
748:Axiology
737:Axiology
718:Skyerise
710:The Void
612:Pandeism
596:HLachman
580:HLachman
486:MusikBot
390:Casliber
219:Archives
192:deletion
171:Signpost
964:Patrick
926:Patrick
865:Phlsph7
846:Patrick
830:Phlsph7
540:Hello,
427:Phlsph7
348:60 days
168:in the
959:place.
576:Dasein
455:Hello,
415:Ethics
47:scale.
677:Z1720
648:Z1720
394:Aza24
386:Femke
375:vital
228:Index
39:This
968:talk
943:and
930:talk
915:This
869:talk
850:talk
834:talk
821:and
746:and
735:and
722:talk
681:talk
652:talk
623:talk
600:talk
584:talk
566:The
553:talk
527:talk
431:talk
423:here
950:Lid
891:Lid
825:.
987::
970:)
932:)
871:)
852:)
836:)
798::
789::
775::
766::
757::
724:)
716:.
683:)
654:)
625:)
602:)
586:)
555:)
529:)
482:—
433:)
425:.
396:.
392:,
388:,
323:24
321:,
319:23
317:,
315:22
313:,
311:21
307:20
305:,
303:19
301:,
299:18
297:,
295:17
293:,
291:16
289:,
287:15
285:,
283:14
281:,
279:13
277:,
275:12
273:,
271:11
267:10
265:,
261:,
257:,
253:,
249:,
245:,
241:,
237:,
233:,
966:(
928:(
867:(
848:(
832:(
720:(
679:(
650:(
621:(
598:(
582:(
551:(
525:(
429:(
404:.
356:.
263:9
259:8
255:7
251:6
247:5
243:4
239:3
235:2
231:1
53::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
