Doklam - Knowledge

1044:

complaint. After several rounds of exchanges, on 30 September 1966, they forwarded a protest from the Bhutanese government which stated that Tibetan grazers were entering the pastures near the Doklam plateau accompanied by Chinese patrols. The letter asserted that the Doklam area was to the "south of the traditional boundary between Bhutan and the Tibet region" in the southern Chumbi area. On 3 October, the Government of Bhutan issued a press statement in which it said, "this area is traditionally part of Bhutan and no assertion has been made by the Government of the People's Republic of China disputing the traditional frontier which runs along recognizable natural features."

654:

are currently oriented northeast towards the Dongkya range. Third, it overlooks the strategic Siliguri Corridor to the south. A claim to the Mount Gipmochi and the Zompelri ridge would bring the Chinese to the very edge of the Himalayas, from where the slopes descend into the southern foothills of Bhutan and India. From here, the Chinese would be able to monitor the Indian troop movements in the plains or launch an attack on the vital Siliguri corridor in the event of a war. To New Delhi, this represents a "strategic redline". Scholar Caroline Brassard states, "its strategic significance for the Indian military is obvious."

720: 1614:, pp. 167–168): "As is the case of putative 'tributary relations' between China's imperial court and foreign rulers, independent scholars see modern Chinese historiography as deeply biased by nearly exclusive reliance on Chinese sources and a nationalist urge to demonstrate China's ancient influence over as wide-ranging an area as possible. Leo Rose's response to these Chinese views was that 'Sikkim and Bhutan were never under any form of control by the Chinese government, or, for that matter, of Tibet except for a short period in the nineteenth century.'" 1409: 870: 732: 1683:

pastures which are adjacent to the southern part of the Chumbi Valley. This area is traditionally part of Bhutan and no assertion has been made by the Government of the People's Republic of China disputing the traditional frontier which runs along recognizable natural features. In the area of the intrusion, the boundary runs along the water-parting along Batang La to Sinchel La. Local attempts were made to inform the graziers and the Chinese troops that they had strayed into Bhutanese territory but these have not been heeded."

882: 744: 1358:, having done a study of social media interactions in Bhutan, recommended that the government should "proactively engage" with citizens and avoid a disconnect between leaders and populations. ENODO found considerable anxiety among the populace regarding the risk of war between India and China, and the possibility of annexation by China similar to that of Tibet in 1951. It found a strengthening of Bhutanese resolve, identity and nationalism, not wanting to be "pushovers". 1162:"Boundary talks are ongoing between Bhutan and China and we have written agreements of 1988 and 1998 stating that the two sides agree to maintain peace and tranquility in their border areas pending a final settlement on the boundary question, and to maintain status quo on the boundary as before March 1959. The agreements also state that the two sides will refrain from taking unilateral action, or use of force, to change the status quo of the boundary." 1129:

statements would make good sense in the context of the geography assumed in the maps of that time, such as Map 3. But the actual geography (Map 5) impedes any further conclusions. Here, Tibet also extends to the east of Sikkim at Mount Gipmochi, which is not implied in the wording of the treaty. Moreover, waters flowing from Gipmochi, the presumed trijunction point, do not flow into Teesta. Neither do they flow "northwards" into the rivers of Tibet.

1055:, but apparently not in Doklam. Bhutan requested the Indian government to raise the matter with China. However, China rejected India's initiatives stating that the issue concerned China and Bhutan alone. Indian commentators state that the Chinese troops withdrew after a month and that the fracas over Doklam brought Bhutan even closer to India, resulting in the appointment of 3,400 Indian defence personnel in Bhutan for training the Bhutanese Army. 960: 390: 924: 342: 56: 936: 354: 996: 426: 72: 972: 402: 1693:

the alignment of the boundary between the two countries at certain specific points, a fair and reasonable solution can very well be found through consultations on an equal footing... Nevertheless it must be explicitly pointed out that the boundary question between China and Bhutan is a matter that concerns China and Bhutan alone and has nothing to do with the Indian Government which has no right whatsoever to intervene in it."

1198: 896: 272: 1437: 1205: 903: 279: 450: 1008: 438: 984: 414: 330: 1226: 948: 378: 366: 591:, to the south of Doklam, among "strategic mountain chokepoints critical in global power competition". John Garver has called the Chumbi Valley "the single most strategically important piece of real estate in the entire Himalayan region". The Chumbi Valley intervenes between Sikkim and Bhutan south of the high Himalayas, pointing towards India's Siliguri Corridor like a "dagger". 1212: 910: 286: 1423: 568: 1238: 1250: 1627:, the head of the Chinese Mission in Tibet, made in a public meeting in Lhasa on 17 July 1959: "Bhutanese, Sikkimise and Ladakhis formed a united family in Tibet; they have been subjects of Tibet and the great motherland of China and must once again be united and taught the Communist doctrine." This passage was apparently deleted from the version reported in 79: 799:". For today's point of view, what was meant by "Mount Gipmochi" is unclear as no land surveys of the area had been undertaken prior to the treaty. Travel maps and sketch maps available from that time period show no awareness of the Doklam plateau on the part of the British, placing Mount Gipmochi directly on the Dongkya range. (See Map 3.) 457: 861:, though not a 'protectorate', of British India in 1910, an arrangement that was continued by independent India in 1949. Bhutan retained its independence in all internal matters and its borders were not demarcated until 1961. It is said that the Chinese cite maps from before 1912 to stake their claim over Doklam. 1682:

Press Statement of 3rd October, 1966, issued on behalf of the Bhutan Government by its Trade Adviser in Calcutta: "His Majesty's Government of Bhutan had for some time, been concerned with reports received from its patrols of a number of intrusions by Tibetan graziers and Chinese troops in the Doklam

1670:

Government of India, 30 September 1966: "...the Government of Bhutan have requested the Government of India to draw the attention of the Chinese Government to a series of intrusions in the Doklan pasture area which lies south of the traditional boundary between Bhutan and the Tibet region of China in

1366:

said that it encountered more people concerned about India's actions than China's. It found expressions of sovereignty and concern that an escalation of the border conflict would hurt trade and diplomatic relations with China. ENODO did not corroborate these observations. Rather it said that hundreds

1272:

In June 2017, Doka La became the site of a stand-off between the armed forces of India and China following an attempt by China to extend a road coming via Sinchela further southward on the Doklam plateau. India does not have a claim on Doklam but it supports Bhutan's claim on the territory. According

1148:

has stated that the watershed principle in the first sentence implies that the Batang La–Merug La–Sinchela ridge should be the China–Bhutan border because both Merug La, at 15,266 feet (4,653 m), and Sinchela, at 14,531 feet (4,429 m), are higher than Gipmochi at 14,523 feet (4,427 m).

1075:

Bhutan said that, through the course of border talks, it had reduced 1,128 km of disputed border areas to 269 km by 1999. In 1996, the Chinese negotiators offered a "package deal" to Bhutan, offering to give up claims on 495 km in the "central region" in exchange for 269 km in the

1047:

In response to the Indian protest, the Chinese government replied that Bhutan was a sovereign country and that China did not recognize any role for the Indian government in the matter. It asserted that the Doklam area had "always been under Chinese jurisdiction", that the Chinese herdsmen had "grazed

1043:

Starting August 1965, China and India traded accusations regarding intrusions into Doklam. China alleged that Indian troops were crossing into Doklam (which they called "Dognan") from Doka La, carrying out reconnaissance and intimidating Chinese herders. At first, the Indians paid no attention to the

1692:

Hsinhua News Agency, 27 October 1966: "China has consistently respected Bhutan's sovereignty and territorial integrity....It is true that the China-Bhutan boundary has never been formally delimited and if the Bhutanese side's understanding is not quite the same as that of the Chinese side as regards

1299:

On 29 June 2017, Bhutan protested the Chinese construction of a road in the disputed territory. The Bhutanese border was put on high alert and border security was tightened as a result of the growing tensions. On the same day, China released a map depicting Doklam as part of China, claiming, via the

1273:

to the Bhutanese government, China attempted to extend the road that previously terminated at Doka La towards the Bhutan Army camp at Zompelri two km to the south; that ridge, viewed as the border by China but as within Bhutan by both Bhutan and India, extends eastward overlooking India's strategic

558:

Bhutan's claimed border runs along the northern ridge of the Doklam plateau until Sinchela and then moves down to the valley to the Amo Chu river. China's claim of the border includes the entire Doklam area within the Chumbi Valley, ending at the Zompelri ridge on the south and the confluence of the

1380:

On 28 August 2017, it was announced that India and China had mutually agreed to a speedy disengagement on the Doklam plateau bringing an end to the military face-off that lasted for close to three months. The Chinese foreign ministry sidestepped the question of whether China would continue the road

1350:

clarified that the land on which China was building a road was "Bhutanese territory" that was being claimed by China, and it is part of the ongoing border negotiations. It defended the policy of silence followed by the Bhutanese government, saying "Bhutan does not want India and China to go to war,

1117:

The boundary of Sikkim and Tibet shall be the crest of the mountain range separating the waters flowing into the Sikkim Teesta and its affluents from the waters flowing into the Tibetan Mochu and northwards into other Rivers of Tibet. The line commences at Mount Gipmochi on the Bhutan frontier, and

1030:

Depictions of historical Chinese maps by the People's Republic of China show Sikkim and Bhutan as part of Tibet or China for a period of 1800 years, starting from the second century B.C., noted as dubious claims by scholars. From 1958, Chinese maps started showing large parts of Bhutanese territory

701:

in 1756, Nepal and Bhutan had coordinated their attacks on Sikkim. Bhutan was eliminated from the contest by an Anglo-Bhutanese treaty in 1774. Tibet enforced a settlement between Sikkim and Nepal, which is said to have irked Nepal. Following this, by 1788, Nepal occupied all of the Sikkim areas to

1658:

Government of China, 27 August 1965: "On July 3, at about 1900 hours, a group of five Indian soldiers crossed the China-Sikkim border and intruded into Dongnan grassland in Tibet, China. They carried out reconnaissance and harassment for as long as four days within Chinese territory before leaving

1371:

television programme titled "7 sins" that castigated India. Scholar Rudra Chaudhuri, having toured the country, noted that Doklam is not as important an issue for the Bhutanese as it might have been ten years ago. Rather the Bhutanese view a border settlement with China as the top priority for the

1335:

The Chinese government maintains that, from historical evidence, Donglang (Doklam) has always been traditional pasture area for the border inhabitants of Yadong, a county in its autonomous region of Tibet, and that China had exercised good administration over the area. It also says that before the

1326:

in Beijing accused India of using Bhutan as "a pretext" to interfere and impede the boundary talks between China and Bhutan. The report referred to India's "trespassing" into Doklam as a violation of the territorial sovereignty of China as well as a challenge to the sovereignty and independence of

1314:

accepted the 1890 Britain-China treaty. Contrary to Chinese claim, Nehru's 26 September 1959 letter to Zhou, stated that the 1890 treaty defined only the northern part of the Sikkim–Tibet border and not the trijunction area. He called for discussion on the "rectification of errors in Chinese maps"

685:

areas to the southwest. During the 18th century, Sikkim faced repeated raids from Bhutan and these areas often changed hands. After a Bhutanese attack in 1780, a settlement was reached, which resulted in the transfer of the Haa valley and the Kalimpong area to Bhutan. The Doklam plateau sandwiched

653:

The desire for heights is thought to bring China to the Doklam plateau. Indian security experts mention three strategic benefits to China from a control of the Doklam plateau. First, it gives it a commanding view of the Chumbi valley itself. Second, it outflanks the Indian defences in Sikkim which

512:

ridge, runs parallel to the first ridge, separated by the Doklam or Doka La valley in the middle. At the top of the valley, the two ridges are joined, forming a plateau. The highest points of the plateau are on its western shoulder, between Batang La and Mount Gipmochi, and the plateau slopes down

3237:

In 1996, China offered a deal giving up 495 sq. km in the middle sector and a part of the 269 sq. km disputed in the western sector, in exchange for prized access to around 100 sq. km in Doklam near the trijunction, which would bring China closer to India's vulnerable 'chicken's neck' or Siliguri

2749:

Nepal during 1816–1923, Afghanistan during 1880–1919, and Bhutan during 1910–47 were British-protected states in all but name, but the British Government never publicly clarified or proclaimed their status as such, preferring to describe them as independent states in special treaty relations with

1099:

Chinese built a road up the Sinchela pass (in undisputed territory) and then over the plateau (in disputed territory), leading up to the Doka La pass, until reaching within 68 metres to the Indian border post on the Sikkim border. Here, they constructed a turn-around facilitating vehicles to turn

1063:

Border negotiations between Bhutan and China began in 1972 with India's participation. However, China sought the exclusion of India. Bhutan commenced its own border negotiations with China in 1984. Prior to putting forward its claim line, it carried out its own surveys and produced maps that were

1034:

In 1960, China issued a statement claiming that Bhutan, Sikkim and Ladakh were part of a unified family in Tibet and had always been subject to the "great motherland of China". Alarmed, Bhutan closed off its border with China and shut all trade and diplomatic contacts. It also established formal

1128:

The first sentence implies that Sikkim is to the south of the boundary and Tibet is to its north, which is the case at least at the eastern end of the boundary. The second sentence would imply that Bhutan is to the east, but does not state anything about the extent of Bhutan to the north. These

1095:

Having turned down China's package deal, in 2000, Bhutanese government put forward its original claim line of 1989. The talks could make no progress afterwards. The government reported that, in 2004, China started building roads in the border areas, leading to repeated protests by the Bhutanese

848:

With the geography of the Doklam plateau becoming known, the later maps show a divergence. The official Survey of India map shows the correct location of Mount Gipmochi on the border of India, but without showing the borders of Bhutan, as per treaty. (Map 5) Unofficial maps often show Batang La

1178:

Notwithstanding the agreement, the PLA crossed into Bhutan in 1988 and took control of the Doklam plateau. There were reports of the PLA troops threatening the Bhutanese guards, declaring it to be Chinese soil, and seizing and occupying Bhutanese posts for extended periods. Again, after 2000,

1157:

Bhutan and China have held 24 rounds of boundary talks since it began in 1984. The Government of Bhutan claims that the Chinese road construction on the Doklam Plateau amounts to unilateral change to a disputed boundary in violation of the 1988 and 1998 agreements between the two nations. The

1592:

Bell did not indicate the route he took to Doklam. But, as can be seen on Map 5, there were two routes: one via the Zompelri ridge between the Dichu and Amo Chu basins (approaching Gipmochi from the east), and the other via the Lasa La ridge in the Dichu basin (approaching Gipmochi from the

689:

Historians qualify this narrative, Saul Mullard states that the early kingdom of Sikkim was very much limited to the western part of modern Sikkim. The eastern part was under the control of independent chiefs, who did face border conflicts with the Bhutanese, losing the Kalimpong area. The

246:

state to the west. It has been depicted as part of Bhutan in the Bhutanese maps since 1961, but it is also claimed by China. The dispute has not been resolved despite several rounds of border negotiations between Bhutan and China. The area is of strategic importance to all three countries.

710:

of 1792. This proved to be a decisive entry of China into the Himalayan politics. The victorious Chinese General ordered a land survey, in the process of which the Chumbi valley was declared as part of Tibet. The Sikkimese resented the losses forced upon them in the aftermath of the war.

1140:

has commented that the continuous mountain crest or watershed mentioned in the first sentence of the 1890 treaty appears to begin very near Batang La, on the northern ridge of the Doklam plateau, and that this suggests a contradiction between the first and second sentences of Article I.

1541: 834:, and then, along an existing "goat track" on a mountain ridge, went up to the Doklam plateau. After reaching Mount Gipmochi, they descended to the Chumbi Valley through Sinchela. This appears to have been the first instance of British exploration of the Doklam plateau. 1318:

China claimed on 5 July 2017 that there was a "basic consensus" between China and Bhutan that Doklam belonged to China, and there was no dispute between the two countries. The Bhutanese government in August 2017 denied that it had relinquished its claim to Doklam.

3354:, p. 1: "According to the Convention, the Dong Lang area, which is located on the Chinese side of the boundary, is indisputably Chinese territory. For long, China's border troops have been patrolling the area and Chinese herdsmen grazing livestock there." 605:

Historically, both Siliguri and Chumbi Valley were part of a highway of trade between India and Tibet. In the 19th century, the British Indian government sought to open up the route to British trade, leading to their suzerainty over Sikkim with its strategic

499:

The Dongkya range that normally runs in the north–south direction gently curves to east–west at the southern end of the Chumbi Valley, running through the Batang La and Sinchela passes and sloping down to the plain. A second ridge to the south, called the

650:, many Chinese fortifications were destroyed as the Indians controlled the high ground. The Chinese military is believed to be in a weak position in the Chumbi Valley because the Indian and Bhutanese forces control the heights surrounding the valley. 2780:

Then, imperialism or no imperialism, Sikkim was declared a protectorate of India in June 1949, a 'regrettable necessity', and a treaty with Bhutan in August of that year obliged that state to accept Indian 'guidance' in foreign affairs, including

2539:, Ch. The Duar War and the Black Regent. "After the Gorkha War, neighbouring Sikkim has become a protectorate of the British and Darjeeling, which the British East India Company had received from the King of Sikkim, had become a British colony.". 258:

pass and Indian troops moved in to prevent further road construction. India claimed to have acted on behalf of Bhutan, with which it has a 'special relationship'. Bhutan has formally objected to China's road construction in the disputed area.

536:(Sangbe), climbing up to the Doklam plateau and descending to the Amo Chu valley through the Sinche La pass. It continues along the river to the hamlet of Asam on what was then regarded as the border of Tibet, and proceeds to the town of 1280:

On 18 June, Indian troops crossed into the territory in dispute between China and Bhutan in an attempt to prevent the road construction. India's entry into the dispute is explained by the extant relations between India and Bhutan. In a

1112:

of 1890, negotiated between the British Empire in India and the Chinese resident in Tibet. Its purpose was to delineate the boundary between Sikkim and Tibet, and Bhutan was mentioned only in the offing. Article I of the treaty states:

3515: 1923: 3636: 1645:

correspondent. Patterson reports that when Prime Minister Nehru raised the matter with China, "he was bluntly informed that China's claims to these border territories were based on the same claim as for their invasion of

3863: 1901: 602:. Often referred to as the "chicken's neck", the Siliguri Corridor represents a strategic vulnerability for India. It is of key strategic significance to Bhutan, containing the main supply routes into the country. 2719:

Finally, a new treaty was concluded on 8 January 1910 between Bhutan and British India at Punakha, whereby the Government of Bhutan agreed to conduct its foreign relations under the guidance and advice of British

1666:

Government of China, 31 January 1966: "...four Indian soldiers crossed Toka La and intruded into Tunglang pasture in Dongnan grassland, and with their weapons intimidated Chinese herdsmen who were grazing cattle

641:

Indian intelligence officials state that China had been carrying out a steady military build-up in the Chumbi Valley, building many garrisons and converting the valley into a strong military base. In 1967,

1323: 638:. There is some fragmentary evidence of trade through the Amo Chu valley, but the valley is said to have been narrow with rocky faces with a torrential flow of the river, not conducive for a trade route. 1662:

Government of India, 2 September 1965: "No Indian soldier has crossed into Chinese territory. As a matter of fact, the Indian troops have strict instructions not to go beyond the boundary of Sikkim with

1583:

was the British Political Officer in Sikkim with responsibility for managing relations with Tibet and Bhutan. He travelled from Sikkim to Bhutan in 1905 via Chumbi Valley. His route is marked on the map.

3782: 2551:, p. 134: "The new compact signified an important landmark in Sikkim's chequered story for now, for the first time, the country's political integrity as British India's 'protectorate' stood confirmed.". 633:

The Doklam area had little role in these arrangements, because the main trade routes were either through the Sikkim passes or through the interior of Bhutan entering the Chumbi Valley in the north near

1389:

Chinese forces reportedly returned to Doklam Plateau in September 2018 and had nearly completed their road construction by January 2019, along with other infrastructure. On 19 November 2020, a Chinese

3808: 3479:: "The situation came to hostility in 1988 when China began exercising her authority over the Chumbi valley , a plateau where strategic interests of India, China and Bhutan meet, if not overlap." 3688: 532:

by China. In the Tibetan language, "Doklam", or more properly "Droklam", means a nomad's path. The said path can be seen in Maps 5–7, which runs from the village of "Shuiji" in the vicinity of

3500: 2653:, pp. 27–28: "So we continued through the snow, following a track used by goats and sheep in the summer, but in the snow used by nobody.... We travelled mainly along the crest of the ridge.". 3752: 2820: 1602:

Bell saw practical virtue in this arrangement, whereby the Tibetans would be able to graze their yaks and highland sheep, while the Bhutanese could make good use of bamboo from the lowlands.

4011: 2174: 3523: 3662: 3710: 1931: 1296:

India has criticised China for "crossing the border" and attempting to construct a road (allegedly done "illegally"), while China has criticised India for entering its "territory".

787:

or the Anglo-Chinese treaty of 1890, recognised British suzerainty over Sikkim and delineated the boundary between Sikkim and Tibet. The border was defined as the watershed between

739:. The border of Bhutan passes through Gipmochi and Batangla peaks (unmarked, but next to "Jelep La"), and, after crossing Amo Chu, continues on the western watershed of Langmaro Chu 543:

India's Sikkim state lies to the west of the Dongkya range, the western shoulder of the Doklam plateau and the 'southwest spur' issuing from Mount Gipmochi. This spur is cut by the

3628: 3117: 3584: 2850: 3417: 814:

obtained the Tibetan agreement to the earlier terms. The boundary established between Sikkim and Tibet in the treaty still survives today, according to scholar John Prescott.

1802: 646:

occurred at Nathu La and Cho La passes, when the Chinese contested the Indian demarcations of the border on the Dongkya range. In the ensuing artillery fire, states scholar

3855: 1909: 1100:

back. This road has been in existence at least since 2005. In 2007, there were reports of the Chinese having destroyed unmanned Indian forward posts on the Doklam plateau.

2999: 2527:, p. 175: "The political significance of this treaty meant that Sikkim, by agreeing to place her foreign relations under British control, became a British protectorate.". 1779: 845:) border over the same geographic region. The highland trees belonged to Tibet, perhaps above 11,500 ft in elevation, while the lowland trees belonged to Bhutan. 1547:

Several newspaper reports wrongly identify "Doklam Plateau" with a disputed area to the east of Chumbi Valley. This is incorrect. The Doklam plateau is indeed to the

4579:

The Facts and China's Position Concerning the Indian Border Troops' Crossing of the China-India Boundary in the Sikkim Sector into the Chinese Territory (2017-08-02)

3976: 3841: 686:

between these regions is likely to have been part of these territories. The Chumbi Valley was still said to have been under the control of Sikkim at this point.

1843: 1828: 1068:

states that the Bhutanese voluntarily shed territory in the process. Other scholars noted a reduction of 8,606 km area in the official Bhutanese maps. The

3774: 3606: 3541: 1571:

Temple was the Lt. Governor of the Bengal province, with jurisdiction over Darjeeling and Kalimpong, as well as the political relations with Sikkim and Bhutan.

4371: 4029: 3816: 3326: 3253: 2273: 771:

in 1861, "confirmed" the protectorate status, and excluded Tibetan influence from Sikkim. The Tibetan effort to retain their own suzerainty resulted in a

1872: 1336:

1960s, if the border inhabitants of Bhutan wanted to herd in Doklam, they needed the consent of the Chinese side and had to pay the grass tax to China.

1096:

government based on the 1998 Peace and Tranquility Agreement. According to a Bhutanese reporter, the most contested area has been the Doklam plateau.

3726:

Notes, Memoranda and Letters Exchanged and Agreements Signed Between the Governments of India and China: September - November 1959, White Paper No. II

3684: 3490: 2035: 3744: 2828: 1179:

numerous intrusions, grazing and road and infrastructure construction by the Chinese were reported as reported in the Bhutanese National Assembly.

547:(also called Jaldhaka) which originates below the Jelep La pass and enters Bhutan. The 'southeast spur', called Zompelri ridge, separates Bhutan's 3881: 2965: 2892: 2295: 2182: 1025:

Map 8: Chinese road construction through Sinchela to Doka La, believed to have been carried out between 2004–2005. Other roads added after 2017.

4737: 3963: 4278: 3723:

India. Ministry of External Affairs, ed. (1959), "Letter from the Prime Minister of India to the Prime Minister of China, 26 September 1959",

4732: 4525: 4505: 4483: 4440: 4420: 4400: 4361: 4326: 4306: 4299:

Discovery of North-East India: Geography, History, Culture, Religion, Politics, Sociology, Science, Education and Economy. Sikkim. Volume 10.

4174: 4154: 4121: 4101: 4055: 3951:

Conflict Resolution: A Population-Centric Approach to Manage Regional Instability – Real-Time Social Media Analysis of the Standoff in Bhutan

3182: 3083: 2712: 2430: 2349: 2233: 2207: 1736: 199: 3658: 3280: 1188: 630:, along with military detachments to protect them. These trade relations continued till 1959, when the Chinese government terminated them. 251: 3134: 1167: 837:

Through this exploration, Bell discovered that the prevailing border between Bhutan and Tibet to the west of Amo Chu was a highland tree (

1957: 1372:

country. While he noticed terms such as "pro-Chinese" and "anti-Indian" often used, he said that what they meant was not well-understood.

3950: 3440: 775:

at the Lingtu mountain in 1888. China, which exercised nominal suzerainty over Tibet, stepped in and signed a treaty on behalf of Tibet.

690:

possession of the Chumbi Valley by the Sikkimese is uncertain, but the Tibetans are known to have fended off Bhutanese incursions there.

3111: 2355: 1526:

After the confluence, the Amo Chu river itself is called "Torsa River" in Bhutan (Map 6). The naming is apparently derived from that of

3576: 540:, which was a border trade mart. According to scholar Jigme Yeshe Lama, such paths were used for ages by traders, nomads and pilgrims. 492:

into two great spurs, one running south-west and the other running south-east. Between these two spurs runs the valley of the Dichu or

2858: 3425: 4613:

Notes, Memoranda and Letters Exchanged Between the Governments of India and China, February 1966–February 1967, White Paper No. XIII

4460: 4203: 2599: 767:(1817). The relations between Sikkim and the British remained rocky, and the Sikkimese retained loyalties to Tibet. Another treaty, 4727: 4722: 3226: 4600:

Notes, Memoranda and Letters Exchanged Between the Governments of India and China, January 1965–February 1966, White Paper No. XII

2797: 826:

was asked to lead a team investigating a supply route to Tibet through Bhutan, via the Amo Chu valley. The team travelled through

4679: 3367: 4742: 4626:

Notes, Memoranda and Letters Exchanged Between the Governments of India and China, February 1967–April 1968, White Paper No. XIV

3007: 3993: 2484: 1787: 1568: 1390: 724: 1048:

cattle there for generations" and that the Bhutanese herdsmen had to pay pasturage to the Chinese side to graze cattle there.

55: 1051:

China later formally extended claims to 800 km (300 sq mi) of territory in northern Bhutan and areas north of

2947: 2925: 2007: 1132:

In addition to these inconsistencies, Bhutan was not a signatory to the treaty. It has no reason to be bound by its terms.

877:, 1955. From the trijunction at Batang La, the border goes north-northeast to the village of Asam, following a ridge line. 4336: 4264: 449: 849:

peak—the peak corresponding to Gipmochi on the Dongkya Range—as the trijunction of the three countries. (Map 4 and 6.)

3833: 1527: 803: 747:

Map 5: 1923 Survey of India map of Sikkim border. Mount Gipmochi is correctly shown with respect to the Dongkya Range.

719: 643: 619: 476: 4692: 4577: 1851: 1820: 1466: 1461: 1290: 1282: 3598: 3549: 1293:

which allows freedom of foreign policy to Bhutan, but mandates cooperation in issues of national security interest.

103: 71: 4263:

Lama, Jigme Yeshe (2022), "Dragon Meets Dragon: Bhutan-China Relationship", in Anita Sengupta; Priya Singh (eds.),

3935: 1476: 1451: 1344:

After issuing a press statement on 29 June 2017, the Bhutanese government and media maintained a studious silence.

3318: 1728:

Ethnolinguistic Prehistory: The Peopling of the World from the Perspective of Language, Genes and Material Culture

1471: 869: 1486: 3262: 2733: 254:

occurred between China and India, as China attempted to extend a road on the Doklam plateau southwards near the

4698: 4212: 2793: 2281: 1367:

of Twitter hashtags were created to rally support for India and that there was a significant blowback over the

1158:

agreements also prohibit the use of force and encourage both parties to strictly adhere to use peaceful means.

1065: 598:

state, which connects the central parts of India with the northeastern states including the contested state of

4452:

Himalayan Triangle: A historical survey of British India's relations with Tibet, Sikkim, and Bhutan, 1765-1950

1456: 1924:"People say in Doklam, India is better placed. Why do we think Chinese could only act here? says Shyam Saran" 1865: 2589: 1308: 480:, representing the 19th century British view of the territory, states that the Dongkya range that separates 4624: 4611: 4598: 2944:

The Eastern Economist; a Weekly Review of Indian and International Economic Affairs, Volume 33, Issues 1–13

1551:

of the Chumbi valley. The disputed area to the east has no single name, but various parts of it are called

3724: 1301: 1109: 784: 731: 615: 3629:"Bhutan issues scathing statement against China, claims Beijing violated border agreements of 1988, 1998" 2043: 1481: 1204: 902: 278: 191: 3200: 2974: 2905: 2144: 2120: 2056: 1866:"Translation of the Proceedings and Resolutions of the 82nd Session of the National Assembly Of Bhutan" 1197: 895: 881: 743: 271: 706:

river as well as four provinces of Tibet. Tibet eventually sought the help of China, resulting in the

528:

The 89 km area between the western shoulder of the plateau and the mouth of Torsa Nala is called

2884: 2303: 807: 694: 594:

The Siliguri Corridor is a narrow 24 kilometer-wide corridor between Nepal and Bangladesh in India's

4650: 4636: 2961: 2734:"The Raj Reconsidered: British India's Informal Empire and Spheres of Influence in Asia and Africa" 1638: 1633: 823: 811: 678: 3856:"Sikkim standoff: China rejects Bhutan's claim, says Doklam has historically been their territory" 2380: 2168: 4558: 4251: 4216: 3886: 3495: 3471: 3288: 2771: 2508: 1362: 1171: 756: 752: 682: 4535: 3901: 3339: 3208: 2591:

Narratives of the Mission of George Bogle to Tibet and of the Journey of Thomas Manning to Lhasa

802:

Continued Tibetan resistance to the acceptance of the Anglo-Chinese treaty eventually led to a

4521: 4501: 4479: 4456: 4436: 4416: 4396: 4357: 4322: 4302: 4294: 4286:

The Spider and The Piglet: Proceedings of the First International Seminar on Bhutanese Studies

4243: 4199: 4170: 4150: 4117: 4097: 3448: 3178: 3172: 3079: 2708: 2700: 2595: 2426: 2418: 2345: 2229: 2203: 1965: 1732: 1580: 1285:, Bhutan agreed to let India guide its foreign policy and defence affairs, reminiscent of its 1089: 772: 768: 764: 736: 707: 666: 599: 588: 576: 4493: 3300: 3298: 2798:"Doklam, Gipmochi, Gyemochen: It's Hard Making Cartographic Sense of a Geopolitical Quagmire" 2337: 2296:"'Bhutan Raised Doklam at All Boundary Negotiations with China' (Interview of Amar Nath Ram)" 1726: 4706: 4550: 4235: 4144: 3413: 2500: 2197: 1311: 1145: 874: 211: 4688: 4683: 4012:"Doklam: China claims India has withdrawn troops in Doklam, silent on plans to build road" 1442: 1261: 1088:. These areas would offer strategic depth to Chinese defences and access to the strategic 1019: 552: 1540: 1397:

approximately 9 km from Doklam and about 2 km within the territory of Bhutan.

1118:

follows the above-mentioned water-parting to the point where it meets Nipal territory" .

4640: 4146:

Strong Borders, Secure Nation: Cooperation and Conflict in China's Territorial Disputes

2805: 698: 493: 183: 4676: 3376: 1436: 1072:

mountain, touted as the tallest peak in Bhutan, has apparently been ceded to China.

4716: 4654: 4562: 4255: 1346: 831: 670: 647: 584: 572: 533: 485: 227: 138: 4470: 4132: 3918: 3204: 3158: 3043: 3041: 2152: 2128: 3834:"Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Lu Kang's Regular Press Conference on June 30, 2017" 1752: 1624: 1428: 1414: 1286: 1136: 858: 827: 788: 703: 674: 669:

was founded in 1642, it included all the areas surrounding the Doklam plateau: the

548: 463: 235: 4318:

Opening the Hidden Land: State Formation and the Construction of Sikkimese History

4226:

Kumar, Pranav; Acharya, Alka; Jacob, Jabin T. (2011). "Sino-Bhutanese Relations".

4184: 3711:

Did Nehru really accept the Sino-British Treaty as final word on the border issue?

3516:"Behind China's Sikkim aggression, a plan to isolate Northeast from rest of India" 2705:

Himalayan Frontiers of India: Historical, Geo-Political and Strategic Perspectives

2423:

Aspects of India's International Relations, 1700 to 2000: South Asia and the World

2368: 1351:

and it is avoiding doing anything that can heat up an already heated situation."

1289:

status during the British colonial rule. In 2007, that treaty was superseded by a

4671: 4515: 4450: 4430: 4410: 4390: 4351: 4316: 4164: 4111: 4091: 3562: 3073: 2939: 2919: 2821:"While the big and the small dragons tryst in Dok-la, the elephant trumpets loud" 2548: 2223: 2015: 1979: 4196:

Unbecoming Citizens: Culture, Nationhood, and the Flight of Refugees from Bhutan

3659:"EXCLUSIVE: China releases new map showing territorial claims at stand-off site" 3231: 1552: 1077: 1069: 595: 544: 537: 4239: 4030:"China Inches Closer to Finishing Construction of 'All-weather Road' in Doklam" 3809:"Don't interfere in Bhutan's dispute, China warns India in statement on Doklam" 2175:"The Hidden History Behind the Doklam Standoff: Superhighways of Tibetan Trade" 4702: 4554: 4051: 3201: