977:. I agree with ArdentBravesFan that to SMEAR a political movement with association with racist radicals casts it in a bad light and thus it is NOT NPOV editing. Against repeated objections by several editors you've repeatedly posted a link to an overtly racist group that advocates relocation to a similar (but not geographically identical--=just overlapping) region. Why? Cui bono? Any notability of that vague similarity is far overshadowed by the IMPLICATION that the two groups are somehow connected. This is especially true when a group is vocally ANTI-racist. I can only see this as a subtle form of character assassination. If POV pushing like this is done systematically, then the end result is that WP readers are led to believe that PTA = KKK. Based upon what I'm seeing at your Talk page, (
1634:. Most others are IPs with far larger and more frequent than average edits as well as some SPAs who may or may not also be socks. The current two big "pro"-contributors recently used the exact same edit summary. I have to say, the article itself is just bad too. It misrepresents sources and magnifies the supposed success of it and its creator, despite the fact that most will have never heard of either. It seems that at least one puppeteer is keeping it criticism-free and not less than a bit promotional. They're apparently very driven too (over a dozen known socks already), so they might be closely connected.
981:,) and your editing history, you have a clear history of pushing POV with regards to mentions of white supremacists and other hate groups in Knowledge pages. (By the way, don't try to purge your Talk page. Those comments are visible to Admins, *forever*.) WP is not about pushing social, political, religious (or anti-religious) agendas. PLEASE strive for neutrality and objectivity! You are correct that none of us involved in this dispute are Administrators. But if you continue this contentious editing IN THE ABSENCE if any consensus, then I will be forced to report your activity to an Admin.
243:
222:
704:
253:
480:
385:
459:
616:
589:
626:
375:
354:
191:
490:
692:
1335:
925:) and have not responded to any points I have brought up. Again, we don't care if this makes a supporter of the American Redoubt project worried that they might somehow be associated with Nazis, or something of that nature (the article explains that they are not racialists, at any rate). We are concerned with
1568:
Regarding the removal of the core tenets of the
Redoubt in this article (from the survivalist blog), please note that I did not merely do a copy/paste (as the other editor asserts) but only selected and summarized several of the key tenets. There is no copyright vio, but I don't do edit-warring, and
1385:
I see a couple of editors (whose IPs reveal they are writing from the
Redoubt) stifling the various points of view on the Redoubt Movement. These editors are pushing a POV that follows a narrative that Rawles lays out. Let's be clear: their view absolutely must be heard. But so too must the other
744:
For the sake of balance and NPOV, I added mention of a newspaper op/ed piece that was critical of the
Redoubt movement. Another wiki editor removed this, calling it a "opinion piece in a local paper by a nobody". Perhaps a more authoritative voice of dissent can be found, but for now, I believe this
1755:
I agree, I didn't mean to imply that it should be deleted. I'm not very active nowadays (very busy etc) but I'll try to make the article a bit more neutral. I've never really made a CheckUser request but might try that too. Hopefully we can simply salvage a decent article out of this without having
1248:
I also restored the properly-referenced mention that Rawles is outspokenly anti-racist. Newspaper articles are valid references for WP. And, BTW, his novels features lots of black, Asian, and
Mexican-American characters in a favorable light. From the very beginning, Rawles has has done his best to
1188:
You would be wrong. Not one of you is able to explain why a link to a movement B with ideology y about relocating to a region is not appropriate in an article about movement A with ideology x which also advocates relocation to that region. Of course, judging by every single comment here, the reason
929:
and expanding the article's collection of relevant 'see also' links to improve
Knowledge's coverage of topics. The link to the article on the Northwest Territorial Imperative is relevant to this article because both are movements for a political migration to the same area of the country. I have yet
1394:
If these editors are
Redoubters who worry that people are "mischaracterizing" what the Redoubt is all about, it's better to lay out those alternate voices and misconceptions. Squelching the voices just leads people to an opposite conclusion -- that the Redoubt really is about control and limiting
1390:
and understand that controversial articles will necessarily include voices that they may view as flat-out wrong or invalid. Nonetheless, that is the way political discourse is. We don't have to agree with everyone, but in
Knowledge-land we have to accurately convey that various people are saying
1223:
I removed the claim that Rawles is 'anti-racist' because one of the only sources cited simply reproduces that claim verbatim with no evidence provided, but even what remains ("outspokenly pro-Israel") seems of questionable relevance in context. Should it just be removed outright or am I just not
839:
I think you are missing the point. It isn't relevant because it is "diametrically opposed" but because it is a similar movement. Both are movements to relocate followers of a particular ideology to the same region of the country. If the
Communist Party USA supported a movement to relocate its
1249:
not associate with racists, neo-nazis, and other radicals who are racially intolerant or who are intolerant of Jews. To leave this article with no mention of his stance on association or disassociation would leave doubts about the motivations of the
American Redoubt movement.
1159:
I also agree that this link is inappropriate and an subtle way of sullying the reputation of The
American Redoubt. Classic "guilt by association"--although in this case it is by LACK of association. Nolan135 should cease and desist from this tendentious editing.
862:
I believe you are incorrect on this issue. Links to radically racist and anti-semite groups can be seen as derogatory. Three different editors have now reverted your link. You need to establish consensus on this issue before reverting this for the fifth
1241:
It is indeed relevant. In the very same sentence, it is mentioned how the Redoubt is envisioned as a safe haven for both Christians and Jews. The history of modern Israel is one of a refuge for the Jews, worldwide. It is a sort of Redoubt, on a grand
1031:. The territories in question do not simply overlap. The core proposal for the NTI is almost exactly the same as that for American Redoubt. The inclusion of this link does not imply any sort of affiliation or ideological/philosophical equivalence.
1689:
Rawles himself has been an active editor (removing stuff that disagrees with his ideology). It would be good to focus this article less on Rawles (he has his own article) and more on what's actually happening with the "movement" (if there one).
1458:
893:, not an organization's public relations? Three editors have reversed my edits to restore the content and none of them have been able to adequately explain why a link that clearly belongs in the article shouldn't be there.
153:
1798:
786:
Inclusion of diametrically opposed "See Also" wiki-links is not in the best interest of fair and un-biased WP editing. If doing so were valid, then we should get busy and add these See Also links:
907:
It has been explained, quite succinctly. Again, you need to establish consensus on this issue before reverting this for the fifth time. No offense intended, but consider this a 3RR warning.
1459:
https://web.archive.org/web/20131023064156/http://ferrycountyview.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=561:op-ed-american-redoubt-or-doubt&catid=64:op-ed&Itemid=85
1462:
771:
283:
1398:
It's ironic that some of the editors are championing an ideal of freedom but are wary of letting that freedom -- of speech -- play out on a subject close to their hearts.
300:
147:
930:
to see anyone offer a valid reason why it doesn't belong. And you aren't an administrator. You can't warn me, and besides, my edits fall outside of a 24 hour period. See
1174:
I've gotta agree, as well. To link an ANTI-racist to a page about racists is underhanded. Nolan needs to cut this out unless he can find consensus with his position.
1853:
722:
1793:
1510:
1506:
1492:
336:
326:
1813:
1583:
These tenets are just copies of the northwest front movement. This whole article was written by Jim Rawles. Please Mark for deletion, NPOV, notability and COA
717:
599:
441:
431:
1103:
Just one editor repeatedly reverting something does not constitute consensus. THREE editors have reverted your change. THAT is something more like consensus.
840:
followers and supporters to New Hampshire, that would be 'See Also' material for the article on the libertarian initiative for the same (Free State Project).
1858:
1848:
1803:
1788:
1300:
290:
1818:
1808:
559:
79:
1843:
682:
672:
1631:
1463:
http://ferrycountyview.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=561:op-ed-american-redoubt-or-doubt&catid=64:op-ed&Itemid=85
772:
http://ferrycountyview.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=561:op-ed-american-redoubt-or-doubt&catid=64:op-ed&Itemid=85
295:
44:
1287:
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add
1828:
550:
540:
407:
1863:
1838:
85:
1823:
1590:
648:
266:
227:
398:
359:
278:
1569:
will leave others to judge, if they're interested. If not, I guess it doesn't meet the notability threshold, right? Best regards.
1833:
1419:
516:
889:
Derogatory according to whose objective standard? And why does it matter to Knowledge, which is written and edited on the basis of
1148:
912:
868:
168:
99:
30:
639:
594:
135:
104:
20:
274:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
74:
1553:
1301:
http://web.archive.org/web/20120712034738/http://seattletimes.nwsource.com:80/html/nationworld/2017469929_redoubt10.html
569:
503:
464:
202:
1144:
908:
864:
565:
65:
1630:
I wouldn't be so sure about that. Take a look at all the big contributors in the past - they include the majority of
921:
It has not been explained. All of those who have removed the link have used the same exact argument (a version of
129:
1108:
827:
805:
1509:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1045:
Since no one seems to want to discuss the article, much less seriously discuss it according to the principle of
1190:
986:
974:
922:
1304:
190:
1165:
125:
1594:
1544:
1450:
1254:
1179:
750:
109:
1423:
1761:
1639:
1724:
1695:
1669:
1611:
1574:
1528:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1516:
1408:
1367:
1347:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1161:
709:
208:
175:
1663:
I take your point about the editors. But looking at Google News I think it would pass an AfD. Stub it?
1449:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1295:
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
1586:
1483:
1325:
1229:
1104:
823:
258:
1605:
This article was written by well over a hundred editors. No chance. It clearly meets our criteria.
982:
812:
390:
161:
55:
647:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
515:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
406:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1250:
1198:
1175:
1054:
1036:
938:
898:
845:
746:
70:
1513:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
745:
one should stand. After all, Knowledge's rules put a premium on third party hard copy sources.
242:
221:
1529:
1348:
1757:
1658:
1635:
1282:
816:
141:
51:
1750:
1719:
1691:
1664:
1625:
1606:
1570:
1442:
1404:
1363:
1272:
24:
1536:
1355:
1290:
1225:
631:
822:
I hope that you can see that this sort of linking could be construed as a smear tactic.
1495:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1387:
1535:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1354:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
625:
615:
588:
479:
458:
1782:
1194:
1050:
1032:
934:
931:
894:
841:
495:
271:
1028:
403:
1502:
1501:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
801:
699:
621:
508:
485:
380:
374:
353:
248:
1718:
You mean the 15 mentions of his name (not counting references)? Good idea.
1305:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2017469929_redoubt10.html
270:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
1765:
1727:
1699:
1672:
1643:
1614:
1598:
1578:
1558:
1427:
1412:
1375:
1258:
1233:
1202:
1183:
1169:
1152:
1112:
1058:
1040:
990:
942:
916:
902:
872:
849:
831:
754:
644:
1342:
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
978:
691:
564:
Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at
512:
794:
1046:
926:
890:
1027:
There is no smear involved. As for your attack against me, see
790:
184:
15:
1395:
the voices...especially those of the (political) minority.
1756:
to start over. We might want to consider protection though.
1468:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
1310:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
690:
1453:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1271:
I have just added archive links to one external link on
507:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
1446:
1418:
I was confused on why so many accounts were suspended
1276:
160:
1386:
voices, and I would ask the editors to kindly review
1799:
Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
643:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
402:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1505:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1491:This message was posted before February 2018.
1193:, mixed with a refusal to assume good faith.
174:
8:
979:https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Nolan135
188:
1584:
1441:I have just modified one external link on
583:
453:
348:
216:
764:
585:
455:
350:
218:
1854:Low-importance Libertarianism articles
1794:Low-importance United States articles
1480:to let others know (documentation at
1322:to let others know (documentation at
7:
1814:Low-importance Conservatism articles
637:This article is within the scope of
501:This article is within the scope of
396:This article is within the scope of
264:This article is within the scope of
1859:WikiProject Libertarianism articles
1849:Start-Class Libertarianism articles
311:Knowledge:WikiProject United States
207:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
1804:WikiProject United States articles
1789:Start-Class United States articles
416:Knowledge:WikiProject Conservatism
314:Template:WikiProject United States
14:
1819:WikiProject Conservatism articles
1809:Start-Class Conservatism articles
1445:. Please take a moment to review
1275:. Please take a moment to review
1049:, I will go ahead and change it.
570:Women of the West, Oregon chapter
419:Template:WikiProject Conservatism
1844:Low-importance politics articles
1758:Bataaf van Oranje (Prinsgezinde)
1636:Bataaf van Oranje (Prinsgezinde)
1333:
702:
624:
614:
587:
488:
478:
457:
383:
373:
352:
251:
241:
220:
189:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1143:I concur with ArdentBravesFan.
677:This article has been rated as
545:This article has been rated as
436:This article has been rated as
331:This article has been rated as
1829:Low-importance Oregon articles
1632:Trasel's confirmed sockpuppets
1219:Relevance of pro-Israel stance
657:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics
1:
1864:WikiProject Politics articles
1839:Start-Class politics articles
1579:11:33, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
1203:18:44, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
1184:14:40, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
1170:00:26, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
1153:22:28, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
1113:21:02, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
715:This article is supported by
660:Template:WikiProject Politics
651:and see a list of open tasks.
519:and see a list of open tasks.
410:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
1559:12:22, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
1059:15:20, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
1041:23:12, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
991:16:12, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
943:03:32, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
917:02:55, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
903:01:33, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
873:17:18, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
850:01:54, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
832:00:26, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
755:03:20, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
525:Knowledge:WikiProject Oregon
1824:Start-Class Oregon articles
1413:22:50, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
566:Oregon Women of Achievement
560:collaborations of the month
528:Template:WikiProject Oregon
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1880:
1522:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1438:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1401:Best regards from nearby,
1376:21:14, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
1293:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
1268:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1224:seeing how it's relevant?
740:Sikander Jaad Op/Ed Column
718:WikiProject Libertarianism
683:project's importance scale
551:project's importance scale
442:project's importance scale
337:project's importance scale
1766:20:21, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
1728:10:32, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
1700:22:39, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
1673:14:44, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
1644:14:37, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
1615:11:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
1599:05:02, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
1428:19:38, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
1381:Evolution of the Movement
1259:00:03, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
1234:00:52, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
806:Campus Crusade for Christ
698:
676:
609:
557:
544:
473:
435:
368:
330:
267:WikiProject United States
236:
215:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1834:WikiProject Oregon pages
399:WikiProject Conservatism
272:United States of America
1434:External links modified
1264:External links modified
1145:BellicoseSouthernBelle
973:This goes far beyond
909:BellicoseSouthernBelle
865:BellicoseSouthernBelle
695:
317:United States articles
197:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
1564:Tenets of the Redoubt
710:Libertarianism portal
694:
422:Conservatism articles
100:Neutral point of view
1503:regular verification
640:WikiProject Politics
259:United States portal
105:No original research
1493:After February 2018
1472:parameter below to
1314:parameter below to
813:Communist Party USA
391:Conservatism portal
285:Articles Requested!
1547:InternetArchiveBot
1498:InternetArchiveBot
1391:various things.
696:
504:WikiProject Oregon
203:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
1601:
1589:comment added by
1523:
1374:
1191:WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT
975:WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT
923:WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT
817:Libertarian Party
737:
736:
733:
732:
729:
728:
663:politics articles
582:
581:
578:
577:
452:
451:
448:
447:
347:
346:
343:
342:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1871:
1754:
1722:
1667:
1662:
1629:
1609:
1557:
1548:
1521:
1520:
1499:
1487:
1443:American Redoubt
1370:
1369:Talk to my owner
1365:
1340:
1337:
1336:
1329:
1294:
1286:
1273:American Redoubt
811:- A link to the
800:- A link to the
789:- A link to the
782:See Also Entries
774:
769:
712:
707:
706:
705:
665:
664:
661:
658:
655:
634:
629:
628:
618:
611:
610:
605:
602:
591:
584:
533:
532:
529:
526:
523:
498:
493:
492:
491:
482:
475:
474:
469:
461:
454:
424:
423:
420:
417:
414:
393:
388:
387:
386:
377:
370:
369:
364:
356:
349:
319:
318:
315:
312:
309:
261:
256:
255:
254:
245:
238:
237:
232:
224:
217:
200:
194:
193:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
25:American Redoubt
16:
1879:
1878:
1874:
1873:
1872:
1870:
1869:
1868:
1779:
1778:
1748:
1720:
1665:
1656:
1623:
1607:
1566:
1551:
1546:
1514:
1507:have permission
1497:
1481:
1451:this simple FaQ
1436:
1383:
1373:
1368:
1338:
1334:
1323:
1288:
1280:
1266:
1221:
1105:ArdentBravesFan
824:ArdentBravesFan
784:
779:
778:
777:
770:
766:
742:
708:
703:
701:
662:
659:
656:
653:
652:
632:Politics portal
630:
623:
603:
597:
531:Oregon articles
530:
527:
524:
521:
520:
494:
489:
487:
467:
421:
418:
415:
412:
411:
389:
384:
382:
362:
316:
313:
310:
307:
306:
305:
291:Become a Member
257:
252:
250:
230:
201:on Knowledge's
198:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1877:
1875:
1867:
1866:
1861:
1856:
1851:
1846:
1841:
1836:
1831:
1826:
1821:
1816:
1811:
1806:
1801:
1796:
1791:
1781:
1780:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1772:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1702:
1680:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1618:
1617:
1565:
1562:
1541:
1540:
1533:
1466:
1465:
1457:Added archive
1435:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1382:
1379:
1366:
1360:
1359:
1352:
1308:
1307:
1299:Added archive
1279:. You may add
1265:
1262:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1220:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1043:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
996:
995:
994:
993:
983:TheSwitzerdude
956:
955:
954:
953:
952:
951:
950:
949:
948:
947:
946:
945:
880:
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
855:
854:
853:
852:
783:
780:
776:
775:
763:
762:
758:
741:
738:
735:
734:
731:
730:
727:
726:
723:Low-importance
714:
713:
697:
687:
686:
679:Low-importance
675:
669:
668:
666:
649:the discussion
636:
635:
619:
607:
606:
604:Low‑importance
600:Libertarianism
592:
580:
579:
576:
575:
555:
554:
547:Low-importance
543:
537:
536:
534:
517:the discussion
500:
499:
483:
471:
470:
468:Low‑importance
462:
450:
449:
446:
445:
438:Low-importance
434:
428:
427:
425:
408:the discussion
395:
394:
378:
366:
365:
363:Low‑importance
357:
345:
344:
341:
340:
333:Low-importance
329:
323:
322:
320:
304:
303:
298:
293:
288:
281:
279:Template Usage
275:
263:
262:
246:
234:
233:
231:Low‑importance
225:
213:
212:
206:
195:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1876:
1865:
1862:
1860:
1857:
1855:
1852:
1850:
1847:
1845:
1842:
1840:
1837:
1835:
1832:
1830:
1827:
1825:
1822:
1820:
1817:
1815:
1812:
1810:
1807:
1805:
1802:
1800:
1797:
1795:
1792:
1790:
1787:
1786:
1784:
1767:
1763:
1759:
1752:
1747:
1746:
1745:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1729:
1726:
1723:
1717:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1701:
1697:
1693:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1674:
1671:
1668:
1660:
1655:
1654:
1653:
1652:
1651:
1650:
1645:
1641:
1637:
1633:
1627:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1616:
1613:
1610:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1600:
1596:
1592:
1591:173.46.77.167
1588:
1581:
1580:
1576:
1572:
1563:
1561:
1560:
1555:
1550:
1549:
1538:
1534:
1531:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1518:
1512:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1494:
1489:
1485:
1479:
1475:
1471:
1464:
1460:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1439:
1433:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1399:
1396:
1392:
1389:
1380:
1378:
1377:
1371:
1364:
1357:
1353:
1350:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1331:
1327:
1321:
1317:
1313:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1292:
1284:
1278:
1274:
1269:
1263:
1261:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1251:DunwoodyWoody
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1218:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1176:DunwoodyWoody
1173:
1172:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1162:OPSECObsessed
1158:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
992:
988:
984:
980:
976:
972:
971:
970:
969:
968:
967:
966:
965:
964:
963:
962:
961:
960:
959:
958:
957:
944:
940:
936:
933:
928:
924:
920:
919:
918:
914:
910:
906:
905:
904:
900:
896:
892:
888:
887:
886:
885:
884:
883:
882:
881:
874:
870:
866:
861:
860:
859:
858:
857:
856:
851:
847:
843:
838:
837:
836:
835:
834:
833:
829:
825:
820:
818:
814:
809:
807:
803:
798:
796:
792:
787:
781:
773:
768:
765:
761:
757:
756:
752:
748:
747:DiligenceDude
739:
724:
721:(assessed as
720:
719:
711:
700:
693:
689:
688:
684:
680:
674:
671:
670:
667:
650:
646:
642:
641:
633:
627:
622:
620:
617:
613:
612:
608:
601:
596:
593:
590:
586:
573:
571:
567:
561:
556:
552:
548:
542:
539:
538:
535:
518:
514:
510:
506:
505:
497:
496:Oregon portal
486:
484:
481:
477:
476:
472:
466:
463:
460:
456:
443:
439:
433:
430:
429:
426:
409:
405:
401:
400:
392:
381:
379:
376:
372:
371:
367:
361:
358:
355:
351:
338:
334:
328:
325:
324:
321:
308:United States
302:
299:
297:
294:
292:
289:
287:
286:
282:
280:
277:
276:
273:
269:
268:
260:
249:
247:
244:
240:
239:
235:
229:
228:United States
226:
223:
219:
214:
210:
204:
196:
192:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1659:Prinsgezinde
1585:— Preceding
1582:
1567:
1545:
1542:
1517:source check
1496:
1490:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1467:
1440:
1437:
1403:
1400:
1397:
1393:
1384:
1361:
1341:
1332:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1309:
1270:
1267:
1247:
1222:
821:
815:page at the
810:
799:
793:page at the
788:
785:
767:
759:
743:
716:
678:
638:
572:(historical)
568:(modern) or
563:
558:The current
546:
502:
437:
413:Conservatism
404:conservatism
397:
360:Conservatism
332:
296:Project Talk
284:
265:
209:WikiProjects
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1751:Doug Weller
1721:Doug Weller
1692:GetSomeUtah
1666:Doug Weller
1626:Doug Weller
1608:Doug Weller
1571:GetSomeUtah
1484:Sourcecheck
1420:68.59.47.87
1405:GetSomeUtah
1326:Sourcecheck
1189:is clearly
199:Start-class
148:free images
31:not a forum
1783:Categories
1554:Report bug
1226:Anarkinsey
802:Sharia Law
760:References
509:U.S. state
1537:this tool
1530:this tool
1356:this tool
1349:this tool
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1587:unsigned
1543:Cheers.—
1362:Cheers.—
1283:cbignore
1195:Nolan135
1051:Nolan135
1033:Nolan135
935:Nolan135
895:Nolan135
842:Nolan135
654:Politics
645:politics
595:Politics
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1470:checked
1447:my edit
1388:WP:NPOV
1372::Online
1312:checked
1277:my edit
804:at the
681:on the
549:on the
440:on the
335:on the
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
1478:failed
1320:failed
1291:nobots
1242:scale.
932:WP:3RR
819:page.
808:page.
797:page.
522:Oregon
513:Oregon
465:Oregon
301:Alerts
205:scale.
126:Google
1029:WP:GF
863:time.
795:NAACP
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1762:talk
1725:talk
1696:talk
1670:talk
1640:talk
1612:talk
1595:talk
1575:talk
1474:true
1424:talk
1409:talk
1316:true
1255:talk
1230:talk
1199:talk
1180:talk
1166:talk
1149:talk
1109:talk
1055:talk
1047:NPOV
1037:talk
987:talk
939:talk
927:NPOV
913:talk
899:talk
891:NPOV
869:talk
846:talk
828:talk
751:talk
562:are
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1511:RfC
1488:).
1476:or
1461:to
1330:).
1318:or
1303:to
791:KKK
673:Low
541:Low
511:of
432:Low
327:Low
176:TWL
1785::
1764:)
1698:)
1642:)
1597:)
1577:)
1524:.
1519:}}
1515:{{
1486:}}
1482:{{
1426:)
1411:)
1328:}}
1324:{{
1289:{{
1285:}}
1281:{{
1257:)
1232:)
1201:)
1182:)
1168:)
1151:)
1111:)
1057:)
1039:)
989:)
941:)
915:)
901:)
871:)
848:)
830:)
753:)
725:).
598::
156:)
54:;
1760:(
1753::
1749:@
1694:(
1661::
1657:@
1638:(
1628::
1624:@
1593:(
1573:(
1556:)
1552:(
1539:.
1532:.
1422:(
1407:(
1358:.
1351:.
1339:Y
1253:(
1228:(
1197:(
1178:(
1164:(
1147:(
1107:(
1053:(
1035:(
985:(
937:(
911:(
897:(
867:(
844:(
826:(
749:(
685:.
574:.
553:.
444:.
339:.
211::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
