63:
260:
581:
587:
133:
22:
407:
485:(2004). However, both these cases saw section 15 claims lose in the Supreme Court, as the justices decided that differential treatment based on marital status in these cases should not affect
422:(i.e., a characteristic which cannot legally be the basis for discrimination under section 15). The Court held that an insurance benefit provided only to married couples discriminated against
481:
448:
429:
John Miron and
Jocelyne Valliere were a common law couple. Miron suffered a car accident and attempted to claim the injuries under his partner's insurance policy. However, the Ontario
669:
498:
92:
649:
630:
475:
411:
654:
659:
234:
216:
114:
49:
154:
147:
35:
197:
169:
623:
674:
75:
679:
285:
John O Miron and
Jocelyne Valliere v Richard Trudel, William James McIsaac and the Economical Mutual Insurance Company
176:
336:
85:
79:
71:
664:
459:, a future Supreme Court justice to defend the legislation in place of and at the cost of the Ontario government.
143:
443:
During the hearing before the
Supreme Court, the Ontario government intervened specifically to concede that the
183:
96:
616:
557:
403:
265:
565:
165:
531:
517:
259:
561:
423:
332:
41:
352:
600:
344:
190:
580:
356:
436:
Miron sued the insurance company arguing that he was discriminated against and that the
419:
415:
643:
452:
360:
325:
291:
596:
340:
532:"Reasoning with the Elephant: The Crown, Its Counsel and Aboriginal Law in Canada"
473:
The finding that common law marriages are protected by section 15 was repeated in
433:
provided that benefits were only available to spouses who were legally married.
132:
456:
348:
455:
criticized
Ontario counsel's refusal to defend the legislation and ordered
391:
Gonthier J. (paras. 1-80), joined by Lamer C.J. and La Forest and Major JJ.
486:
375:
McLachlin J. (paras. 119-), joined by
Sopinka, Cory and Iacobucci JJ.
466:
violation and that it could not be saved under section 1 of the
126:
56:
15:
462:
In a five to four decision the Court found that there was a
482:
Hodge v. Canada (Minister of Human
Resources Development)
604:
499:
List of
Supreme Court of Canada cases (Lamer Court)
387:
379:
371:
366:
316:
308:
300:
290:
280:
273:
252:
84:but its sources remain unclear because it lacks
447:violated section 15 and could not be saved by
624:
8:
670:Marriage, unions and partnerships in Canada
50:Learn how and when to remove these messages
631:
617:
235:Learn how and when to remove this message
217:Learn how and when to remove this message
115:Learn how and when to remove this message
510:
476:Nova Scotia (Attorney General) v. Walsh
412:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
249:
153:Please improve this article by adding
7:
576:
574:
518:SCC Case Information - Docket 22744
603:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by
406:decision on equality rights under
14:
383:L'Heureux‑Dubé J. (paras. 81-118)
31:This article has multiple issues.
650:Section Fifteen Charter case law
585:
579:
258:
131:
61:
20:
39:or discuss these issues on the
418:" was an analogous ground for
1:
655:Supreme Court of Canada cases
155:secondary or tertiary sources
402:, 2 S.C.R. 418 is a famous
247:Supreme Court of Canada case
696:
573:
660:1995 in Canadian case law
321:
257:
70:This article includes a
558:Supreme Court of Canada
530:Wilkins, Kerry (2016).
520:Supreme Court of Canada
414:where the Court found "
404:Supreme Court of Canada
266:Supreme Court of Canada
99:more precise citations.
536:Indigenous Law Journal
276:Judgment: May 25, 1995
274:Hearing: June 2, 1994
142:relies excessively on
440:violated section 15.
337:Claire L'Heureux-Dubé
312:Miron appeal allowed
675:Common-law marriage
595:This article about
680:Canadian law stubs
424:common-law couples
353:Beverley McLachlin
72:list of references
665:Marriage case law
612:
611:
395:
394:
245:
244:
237:
227:
226:
219:
201:
125:
124:
117:
54:
687:
633:
626:
619:
591:
590:
589:
588:
583:
575:
544:
543:
527:
521:
515:
451:. Chief Justice
345:Charles Gonthier
333:GĂ©rard La Forest
330:Puisne Justices:
317:Court membership
262:
250:
240:
233:
222:
215:
211:
208:
202:
200:
166:"Miron v Trudel"
159:
135:
127:
120:
113:
109:
106:
100:
95:this article by
86:inline citations
65:
64:
57:
46:
24:
23:
16:
695:
694:
690:
689:
688:
686:
685:
684:
640:
639:
638:
637:
586:
584:
578:
571:
553:
548:
547:
529:
528:
524:
516:
512:
507:
495:
357:Frank Iacobucci
328:
275:
269:
248:
241:
230:
229:
228:
223:
212:
206:
203:
160:
158:
152:
148:primary sources
136:
121:
110:
104:
101:
90:
76:related reading
66:
62:
25:
21:
12:
11:
5:
693:
691:
683:
682:
677:
672:
667:
662:
657:
652:
642:
641:
636:
635:
628:
621:
613:
610:
609:
592:
569:
568:
552:
551:External links
549:
546:
545:
522:
509:
508:
506:
503:
502:
501:
494:
491:
420:discrimination
416:marital status
399:Miron v Trudel
393:
392:
389:
385:
384:
381:
377:
376:
373:
369:
368:
364:
363:
323:Chief Justice:
319:
318:
314:
313:
310:
306:
305:
302:
298:
297:
294:
288:
287:
282:
281:Full case name
278:
277:
271:
270:
263:
255:
254:
253:Miron v Trudel
246:
243:
242:
225:
224:
207:September 2016
139:
137:
130:
123:
122:
105:September 2016
80:external links
69:
67:
60:
55:
29:
28:
26:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
692:
681:
678:
676:
673:
671:
668:
666:
663:
661:
658:
656:
653:
651:
648:
647:
645:
634:
629:
627:
622:
620:
615:
614:
608:
606:
602:
598:
593:
582:
577:
572:
567:
563:
559:
556:Full text of
555:
554:
550:
541:
537:
533:
526:
523:
519:
514:
511:
504:
500:
497:
496:
492:
490:
488:
484:
483:
478:
477:
471:
469:
465:
460:
458:
454:
450:
446:
445:Insurance Act
441:
439:
438:Insurance Act
434:
432:
431:Insurance Act
427:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
400:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
370:
367:Reasons given
365:
362:
361:John C. Major
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
331:
327:
326:Antonio Lamer
324:
320:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
293:
289:
286:
283:
279:
272:
268:
267:
261:
256:
251:
239:
236:
221:
218:
210:
199:
196:
192:
189:
185:
182:
178:
175:
171:
168: –
167:
163:
162:Find sources:
156:
150:
149:
145:
140:This article
138:
134:
129:
128:
119:
116:
108:
98:
94:
88:
87:
81:
77:
73:
68:
59:
58:
53:
51:
44:
43:
38:
37:
32:
27:
18:
17:
605:expanding it
597:Canadian law
594:
570:
560:decision at
539:
535:
525:
513:
480:
474:
472:
467:
463:
461:
444:
442:
437:
435:
430:
428:
398:
397:
396:
341:John Sopinka
329:
322:
296:2 S.C.R. 418
284:
264:
231:
213:
204:
194:
187:
180:
173:
161:
141:
111:
102:
91:Please help
83:
47:
40:
34:
33:Please help
30:
479:(2002) and
380:Concurrence
97:introducing
644:Categories
564: and
505:References
457:Ian Binnie
408:section 15
349:Peter Cory
301:Docket No.
177:newspapers
144:references
36:improve it
449:section 1
292:Citations
42:talk page
542:(1): 52.
493:See also
372:Majority
487:dignity
468:Charter
464:Charter
410:of the
388:Dissent
191:scholar
93:improve
566:CanLII
309:Ruling
304:22744
193:
186:
179:
172:
164:
599:is a
562:LexUM
453:Lamer
198:JSTOR
184:books
78:, or
601:stub
170:news
146:to
646::
540:13
538:.
534:.
489:.
470:.
426:.
359:,
355:,
351:,
347:,
343:,
339:,
335:,
157:.
82:,
74:,
45:.
632:e
625:t
618:v
607:.
238:)
232:(
220:)
214:(
209:)
205:(
195:·
188:·
181:·
174:·
151:.
118:)
112:(
107:)
103:(
89:.
52:)
48:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
