374:; In this situation the agent is the government and the principal is the population that elected them. When the government is elected they now do not just represent the group of people that elected them but everyone who voted. So this can lead to some of the population viewing the new policy as a government failure and some seeing it as a success. This will cause market failure because the agent will peruse their own self-interest instead of the interest of the principals that elected them (political self interest).
353:. They can artificially change prices thus distorting markets and disturb the way markets allocate scarce resources. Also, taxes can give people incentive to evade them, which is illegal. Minimum price can also result in markets’ distortion (i.e. alcohol, tobacco). Consumer would spend more on harmful goods, therefore less of their income will be spent on beneficial goods. Subsidies can also lead to misuse of scarce resources as they can help inefficient enterprises by protecting them from free market forces.
248:
accomplished either through queuing and waiting-lists or through delegating the decisions to bureaucrats. Both solutions are inefficient, queueing first meets the demand of people at the front of the queue, which might not be the ones who need or want the product or service the most, but rather the luckiest or the ones with the right connections. Delegating the decisions to bureaucrats leads to problems with human factor and personal interests.
788:
144:
is how alternative arrangements will actually work in practice. It has led economists to derive conclusions for economic policy from a study of an abstract of a market situation. It is no accident that in the literature...we find a category "market failure" but no category "government failure." Until we realize that we are choosing between social arrangements which are all more or less failures, we are not likely to make much headway.
386:(e.g. post offices). Their status is sometimes guaranteed by the government, protecting them from potential competition. Furthermore, as opposed to private monopolies, the threat of bankruptcy is eliminated, as these companies are backed by government money. The companies are thus not facing many efficiency pressures which would push them towards cost minimisation - causing a social inefficiency.
197:
in flawed quantity regulation when either too much or too little of the good or service is produced, subsequently creating either excess supply or excess demand. Imperfect information can come in many forms including; Uncertainty, Vagueness, Incompleteness and impreciseness. All creating flaws in government policy's and therefore in turn creating inefficiencies within the economy.
68:, which is an economic inefficiency that results from the free market itself, and can potentially be corrected through government regulation. However, Government failure often arises from an attempt to solve market failure. The idea of government failure is associated with the policy argument that, even if particular markets may not meet the standard conditions of
257:
system. Cost in the system are classified as a credence-costs as the buyer cannot tell the quantity bought even after buying them. This means that
Administration and enforcement costs for a project can be over or under assumed and therefore a market failure can therefore be dismissed easily or over analyzed (however benefits can also be credence-benefits).
356:
Price floors and price ceilings can also lead to social inefficiencies or other negative consequences. If price floors, such as minimum wage, are set above the market equilibrium price, they lead to shortage in supply, in case of minimum wage to a higher unemployment. Similarly the price ceilings, if
256:
Market failure can occur when the costs of the project outweigh the benefits. Costs that are included are; Tax collection through government departments, law enforcement and policy creation. All these costs allocations are quite broad however a lot of people are required to run a secure and efficient
214:
Political self-interest is very similar to political interference however instead of being persuaded by others, the politicians are persuaded by self-interests. This could look like inappropriate allocation of funds or time. Public funds could be pushed to influence voters or time could be allocated
143:
Contemplation of an optimal system may provide techniques of analysis that would otherwise have been missed and, in certain special cases, it may go far to providing a solution. But in general its influence has been pernicious. It has directed economists’ attention away from the main question, which
389:
There are still some existing efficiency pressures on state monopoly managers. They mostly come from the possibility of their political masters being voted out of office. These pressures are however unlikely to be as effective as market pressures, the reasons being that the elections are held quite
196:
While a perfectly informed government might make an effort to reach the social equilibrium via quality, quantity, price or market structure regulation, it is difficult for the government to obtain necessary information (such as production costs) to make right decisions. This absence may then result
79:
Government failure (by definition) does not occur when government action creates winners and losers, making some people better off and others worse off than they would be without governmental regulation. It occurs only when governmental action creates an inefficient outcome, where efficiency would
75:
As with a market failure, government failure is not a failure to bring a particular or favored solution into existence but is rather a problem that prevents an efficient outcome. The problem to be solved does not need to be market failure; governments may act to create inefficiencies even when an
205:
Is not uncommon where government policies are influenced by groups of people with common interests (unions or political parties). The influence of these groups can affect policies, where they could overlook market failures leading to greater inefficiency or the government could overpursue policy
282:
Crowding out is when the government over corrects the market failure leading to the displacement of the private sector investment. This involves an excess amount of spending in the public sector, excess increase in interest rates or excess increase in taxes all of which will decrease the public
268:
is a problem which occurs whilst trying to implement regulations in selected industry. As government regulators usually have to meet with the industry representatives, they tend to form a personal relationship, which may lead them to be more sympathetic towards requirements and needs of given
223:
Another cause of the government failure, as many critics of government intervention claim, is that politicians tend to look for short term fixes with instant and visible results that do not have to last, to difficult economic problems rather than making thorough analysis for solving long-term
247:
Government subsidies may lead to excess demand, which can be solved in two ways. Either the government chooses to meet all the demand, leading to higher consumption than socially efficient or if it knows the socially efficient amount, it can decide who gets how much of this quantity, a goal
448:– involving private professional to make decisions to cut less necessary costs or to help to make some decisions. One of the key steps can also be to delegate the power and decisions, which may release the pressure from the government and help it to concentrate on more important cases
361:
of labor and higher unemployment among uneducated and poor are possible consequences of minimum wage while deterioration of residential buildings might be caused by rent ceiling and subsequent lack of incentive for landlords to provide the best services possible.
123:
The phrase "government failure" emerged as a term of art in the early 1960s with the rise of intellectual and political criticism of government regulations. Building on the premise that the only legitimate rationale for government regulation was
430:
When a country gets into this kind of complicated situation it is not possible to reverse it right away. However, there are some arrangements that the government could do, to try to overcome it step by step. For example:
1075:
This paper hopes to contribute towards an explanation of these empirical regularities by developing and testing a new contextually enriched career concerns model of the political economy of public policy-making.
357:
set under the market equilibrium price, lead to shortage in supply. Rent ceiling for example may then lead to shortage in accommodation. Other problems often arise as consequences of these interventions.
766: • Eduardo Wiesner (1998). "Transaction Cost Economics and Public Sector Rent-Seeking in Developing Countries: Toward a Theory of Government Failure," in E. Wiesner and R. Picciotto, ed.
590: • Eduardo Wiesner (1998). "Transaction Cost Economics and Public Sector Rent-Seeking in Developing Countries: Toward a Theory of Government Failure," in E. Wiesner and R. Picciotto, ed.
318:
argued in 2013 that rent extraction positively correlates with government size even in stable democracies with high income, robust rule of law mechanisms, transparency, and media freedom.
341:" is a misnomer. From this perspective, all governmental interference in free markets creates inefficiencies and are therefore less preferable to private market self-correction.
283:
sectors borrowing demand from banks. This whole situation forces inefficiencies in the private sector and therefore shrinks, causing a market failure from a government failure.
586:
115:. Government failure may arise in any of three ways the government can involve in an area of social and economic activity: provision, taxation or subsidy and regulation.
1068:"Small is Beautiful, at Least in High-Income Democracies: The Distribution of Policy-Making Responsibility, Electoral Accountability, and Incentives for Rent Extraction"
95:. Government failure may arise because of unanticipated consequences of a government intervention, or because an inefficient outcome is more politically feasible than a
1181:
1067:
867:
878:• Buchanan James M. (1983). "The Achievement and the Limits of Public Choice in Diagnosing Government Failure and in Offering Bases for Constructive Reform," in
841:
240:, people could try to sell goods with no taxes. Also legalizing and taxing some drugs may arise in a quick expansion of the supply of drugs, which can lead to
1338:
1328:
837:
916:
714:
422:(CFP). Set up to counteract a concern of balancing natural marine resources with commercial profiteering, the CFP has in turn created political upheaval.
1256:
629:
687: • Aidan R. Vining and David L. Weimer (1990). "Government Supply and Government Production Failure: A Framework Based on Contestability,"
1321:
829:
1349:
1239:
1195:
1107:
Rothbard, M. N. (1961). The fallacy of the ‘public sector.’. The Logic Of Action Two, Application and
Criticism from the Austrian School.
738:
1275:
Dollery, Brian, and Andrew
Worthington (1996). "The Evaluation of Public Policy: Normative Economic Theories of Government Failure,"
1367:
1315:
1301:
294:
is a regulated institution's taking advantage of the difference between its real (or economic) risk and the regulatory position.
1032:
445:
484:
1392:
1045:
692:
371:
112:
80:
otherwise exist. A defining feature of government failure is where it would be possible for everyone to be better off (
1397:
1126:
64:. The costs of the government intervention are greater than the benefits provided. It can be viewed in contrast to a
1382:
176:
469:
128:, economists advanced new theories arguing that government interventions in markets were costly and tend to fail.
1402:
1214:
850:
474:
1253:
959:
269:
industry, subsequently making the regulations more favourable towards the producers rather than the society.
1387:
419:
311:
Regulatory risk is the risk faced by private-sector firms that regulatory changes will hurt their business.
504:
673:
236:, it can lead to increase attempts of illegal activities as tax avoidance, tax evasion or development of
72:
required to ensure social optimality, government intervention may make matters worse rather than better.
1175:
1081:
826:
818:
390:
infrequently and even their results are often fairly independent on the efficiency of state monopolies.
156:
57:
232:
It is believed that when a government tries to levy higher taxes on goods such as alcohol, also called
206:
changes due to the influence creating market failures as this is an incorrect allocation of resources.
924:
896:
771:
722:
595:
1116:
DiLorenzo, T. J. (1996). The Myth of
Natural Monopoly. The Review of Austrian Economics, 9(2), 43–58.
800:
682:
621:
315:
291:
160:
136:
108:
92:
977:
783:
Thomas
Andersson (1991). "Government Failure – the Cause of Global Environmental Mismanagement,"
732:
Government
Failure versus Market Failure: Microeconomics Policy Research and Government Performance
464:
402:
can take many forms, ranging from direct misappropriation of government funds to the collection of
69:
42:
709: • Richard O. Zerbe Jr. and Howard E. McCurdy (1999). "The Failure of Market Failure,"
641:
McKean, Roland N. (1965), "The Unseen Hand in
Government," "American Economic Review," 55(3), pp,
1332:
1163:
1024:
697:
494:
322:
305:
297:
265:
104:
88:
81:
107:
side. Demand-side failures include preference-revelation problems and the illogic of voting and
1013:(1979). "Analyzing Regulatory Failure: Mismatches, Less Restrictive Alternatives, and Reform,"
1363:
1311:
1297:
855:
812:
350:
168:
164:
96:
735:
1153:
727:
479:
338:
49:
31:
1260:
1094:
833:
754:
742:
578:
459:
326:
241:
155:
notion of government behavior. More formal and general analysis followed in such areas as
60:
caused by a government regulatory action, if the inefficiency would not have existed in a
1287:
Political cycles in nontraditional settings: theory and evidence from the case of Mexico
1270:
705:
300:
is the co-opting of regulatory agencies by members of or the entire regulated industry.
1265:
_____ (1983). "A Theory of
Competition among Pressure Groups for Political Influence,"
1010:
885:
762:
669:
509:
489:
415:
383:
330:
152:
125:
65:
1286:
677: • Mrinal Datta-Chaudhuri (1990). "Market Failure and Government Failure."
1376:
1167:
514:
439:
180:
172:
148:
911:
Richard O. Zerbe Jr. and Howard E. McCurdy (1999). "The
Failure of Market Failure,"
414:
A leading example of governmental failure can be seen with the consequences of the
358:
301:
233:
132:
35:
442:
which may arise on into competition between them, which is good for moving forward
900:
435:
The government could assign itself some future goals, and also try to fulfil them
1245:
237:
183:
in 1970s, government failure attracted the attention of the academic community.
61:
17:
845: • Sharun W. Mukand (2008). "policy reform, political economy of,"
1158:
1141:
399:
700:(1998). "The Private Uses of Public Interests: Incentives and Institutions,"
1280:
1027:(2009). "Regulation and Failure," in David Moss and John Cisternino (eds.),
1018:
803:(1995). "The Politics and Economics of Redistribution and Inefficiency,"
398:
The private utilization of public resources by the government officials.
334:
1353:
499:
100:
1348:, Institute for Defense Analyses, Program Analysis Division (1967),
882:, ed. Horst Hanusch (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1983), pp. 15–25.
642:
1234:
Aidt, Toke S. (2003). "Economic
Analysis of Corruption: A Survey,"
659:
549:
Connolly, S. & Munro, A. (1999). 'Public Choice', Chapter 8 in
538:
215:
to pursue personal inequalities instead of actual market failures.
403:
995:
Kenton, Will. "What Is the Crowding Our Effect Economic Theory".
1073:. The World Bank Institute. Policy Research Working Paper 6305.
666:
Markets Or Governments: Choosing between Imperfect Alternatives
616:
Coase, Ronald (1964). "The Regulated Industries: Discussion,"
807:, December, 17, pp. 115–136, reprinted in Williamson (1996),
654:• Charles J. Wolf, (1979). "A Theory of Non-Market Failure,"
1325:(2008), 2nd Edition with Table of Contents/Abstract links:
438:
Competitive Tendering – making good offers to private and
1196:"arguments for and against the Common Fisheries Policy"
768:
Evaluation and Development: The Institutional Dimension
592:
Evaluation and Development: The Institutional Dimension
308:
are two of the mechanisms which allow this to happen.
533:
Orbach, Barak (2013). "What Is Government Failure,"
151:used the term in 1965 to suggest limitations on an
34:. For the term describing a failed government, see
624:(2002), "The Lens of Contract: Private Ordering,"
135:(1964) in comparing an actual and ideal system of
30:This article is about a term used in the field of
689:Journal of Public Policy Journal of Public Policy
757:(1990). "Government Failures in Development,"
893:Government Failure: A Primer in Public Choice
99:to it. Government failure can be on both the
8:
1180:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
581:(1991). "The Theory of Government Failure,"
131:An early use of "government failure" was by
84:) under a different regulatory environment.
1289:", JLE vol. XLIII (April 2000), p. 239
111:. Supply-side failures largely result from
384:government providers operate as monopolies
1360:Bureaucracy and Representative Government
1157:
921:Economic Efficiency in Law and Economics,
913:Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
719:Economic Efficiency in Law and Economics,
711:Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
329:, argue that regulation is the source of
252:High Administrative and Enforcement costs
1322:The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
864:The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
860:The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
847:The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
244:, which can mean a decrease in welfare.
811:, Oxford University Press, ch. 8, pp.
526:
87:Examples of government failure include
76:efficient market solution is possible.
1339:"rational choice and political science
1285:Grier, Robin M. and, Kevin B. Grier "
1277:Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics
1173:
1090:
1079:
941:Magni, Stefano. "Government Failure".
936:
934:
932:
1346:The Peculiar Economics of Bureaucracy
1248:(1958) "Competition and Democracy,"
954:
952:
7:
978:"Policy Myopia:causes and treatment"
583:British Journal of Political Science
573:
571:
569:
567:
565:
563:
561:
559:
1308:Railroads and Regulation, 1877–1916
1142:"The anatomy of government failure"
228:Government intervention and evasion
943:Handbook of Agricultural Economics
880:Anatomy of Government Deficiencies
179:. Later, due to the popularity of
25:
1213:Pettinger, Tejvan (24 May 2018).
1140:Keech, Munger, W.R, M.C. (2015).
535:Yale Journal on Regulation Online
446:Public & Private Partnerships
406:in exchange for public policies.
1310:, Greenwood Publishing Company,
759:Journal of Economic Perspectives
702:Journal of Economic Perspectives
679:Journal of Economic Perspectives
1329:"laissez-faire, economists and"
1066:Hamilton, Alexander J. (2013).
823:The Polítical Economy of Reform
734:. Brookings Institution Press.
1267:Quarterly Journal of Economics
1029:New Perspectives on Regulation
821:, and Mariano Tommasi (1998).
620:, 54(2), p. 195, as quoted in
551:Economics of the Public Sector
485:Law of unintended consequences
1:
1035:Cambridge: The Tobin Project.
426:Overcoming government failure
1250:Journal of Law and Economics
997:Government Spending and Debt
809:The Mechanisms of Governance
664: • _____ (2003).
656:Journal of Law and Economics
187:Causes of government failure
1294:The Triumph of Conservatism
919:Reprinted in Zerbe (2001),
915:, 18(4), pp. 558–578.
787:, 4(3), pp. 215–236.
713:, 18(4), pp. 558–578.
27:Concept of public economics
1419:
1344:Niskanen, William (1967),
1238:, 113(491), Features, pp.
314:Alexander Hamilton of the
177:transaction-cost economics
40:
29:
1159:10.1007/s11127-015-0262-y
1127:"principal Agent Problem"
553:, Pearson, Harlow, Essex.
1337:
626:American Economic Review
618:American Economic Review
475:Economic interventionism
337:, adding that the term "
41:Not to be confused with
1306:Kolko, Gabriel (1977),
1292:Kolko, Gabriel (1977),
858:(2008). "public debt,"
420:Common Fisheries Policy
372:principal agent problem
366:Principal-agent problem
210:Political self-interest
113:principal–agent problem
1089:Cite journal requires
819:Sturzenegger, Federico
505:Tragedy of the commons
201:Political Interference
1341:" by Susanne Lohmann.
805:Greek Economic Review
672:and chapter-preview
470:Dunning–Kruger effect
349:Taxation can lead to
345:Distortion of markets
278:Economic crowding out
192:Imperfect information
157:development economics
137:industrial regulation
58:economic inefficiency
1393:Public choice theory
1362:, Aldine, Atherton,
1335:and Steven G. Medema
1215:"Government Failure"
1023: •
960:"Government Failure"
899:and scroll-down for
866:(2008), 2nd Edition.
801:Oliver E. Williamson
785:Ecological Economics
622:Oliver E. Williamson
316:World Bank Institute
292:Regulatory arbitrage
181:public choice theory
161:ecological economics
109:collective behaviour
93:regulatory arbitrage
1327:
691:, 10(1), pp. 1–22.
465:Dispersed knowledge
410:EU Fisheries Policy
323:Austrian economists
70:perfect competition
43:Government shutdown
1398:Libertarian theory
1333:Roger E. Backhouse
1296:, The Free Press,
1259:2012-03-28 at the
1025:Joseph E. Stiglitz
1015:Harvard Law Review
966:. 27 January 2020.
895:, Cato Institute.
832:2012-10-11 at the
741:2011-04-29 at the
698:Joseph E. Stiglitz
495:Perverse subsidies
306:rational ignorance
298:Regulatory capture
266:Regulatory capture
261:Regulatory Capture
97:Pareto improvement
89:regulatory capture
82:Pareto improvement
54:Government failure
48:In the context of
1383:Economic problems
1046:"Regulatory risk"
856:Buchanan James M.
351:market distortion
169:political economy
165:political science
16:(Redirected from
1410:
1403:Public economics
1236:Economic Journal
1223:
1222:
1210:
1204:
1203:
1192:
1186:
1185:
1179:
1171:
1161:
1137:
1131:
1130:
1123:
1117:
1114:
1108:
1105:
1099:
1098:
1092:
1087:
1085:
1077:
1072:
1063:
1057:
1056:
1054:
1053:
1042:
1036:
1007:
1001:
1000:
992:
986:
985:
974:
968:
967:
964:Economics Online
956:
947:
946:
938:
927:
909:
903:
876:
870:
838:chapter-previews
797:
791:
781:
775:
751:
745:
728:Clifford Winston
652:
646:
639:
633:
614:
608:
605:
599:
575:
554:
547:
541:
531:
480:Government waste
378:State monopolies
339:natural monopoly
50:public economics
32:public economics
21:
18:Government waste
1418:
1417:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1373:
1372:
1336:
1326:
1261:Wayback Machine
1231:
1226:
1212:
1211:
1207:
1200:Debating Europe
1194:
1193:
1189:
1172:
1139:
1138:
1134:
1125:
1124:
1120:
1115:
1111:
1106:
1102:
1088:
1078:
1070:
1065:
1064:
1060:
1051:
1049:
1048:. Economist.com
1044:
1043:
1039:
1022:
1008:
1004:
994:
993:
989:
976:
975:
971:
958:
957:
950:
940:
939:
930:
910:
906:
883:
877:
873:
854: •
853:
849:, 2nd Edition.
844:
834:Wayback Machine
817: •
816:
798:
794:
782:
778:
765:
755:Anne O. Krueger
752:
748:
743:Wayback Machine
725:
708:
695:
686:
676:
663:
658:, 22 (1), pp.
653:
649:
640:
636:
615:
611:
606:
602:
589:
579:Julian Le Grand
576:
557:
548:
544:
532:
528:
524:
519:
460:Abilene paradox
455:
428:
412:
396:
380:
368:
347:
333:in the form of
327:Murray Rothbard
289:
280:
275:
263:
254:
242:overconsumption
230:
221:
212:
203:
194:
189:
121:
46:
39:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1416:
1414:
1406:
1405:
1400:
1395:
1390:
1388:Market failure
1385:
1375:
1374:
1371:
1370:
1358:_____ (1971),
1356:
1342:
1318:
1304:
1290:
1283:
1273:
1263:
1243:
1230:
1227:
1225:
1224:
1219:Economics Help
1205:
1187:
1132:
1118:
1109:
1100:
1091:|journal=
1058:
1037:
1011:Stephen Breyer
1002:
987:
969:
948:
928:
904:
886:Gordon Tullock
884: •
871:
862:, 2nd Edition
825:, MIT Press.
792:
776:
746:
726: •
696: •
668:, MIT Press.
647:
634:
609:
600:
555:
542:
525:
523:
520:
518:
517:
512:
510:X-inefficiency
507:
502:
497:
492:
490:Market failure
487:
482:
477:
472:
467:
462:
456:
454:
451:
450:
449:
443:
436:
427:
424:
416:European Union
411:
408:
395:
392:
379:
376:
367:
364:
346:
343:
331:market failure
288:
285:
279:
276:
274:
271:
262:
259:
253:
250:
234:de-merit goods
229:
226:
220:
217:
211:
208:
202:
199:
193:
190:
188:
185:
153:invisible-hand
146:
145:
126:market failure
120:
117:
66:market failure
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1415:
1404:
1401:
1399:
1396:
1394:
1391:
1389:
1386:
1384:
1381:
1380:
1378:
1369:
1368:0-202-06040-3
1365:
1361:
1357:
1355:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1340:
1334:
1330:
1324:
1323:
1319:
1317:
1316:0-8371-8885-7
1313:
1309:
1305:
1303:
1302:0-02-916650-0
1299:
1295:
1291:
1288:
1284:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1272:
1269:, 98(3), pp.
1268:
1264:
1262:
1258:
1255:
1251:
1247:
1244:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1232:
1228:
1220:
1216:
1209:
1206:
1201:
1197:
1191:
1188:
1183:
1177:
1169:
1165:
1160:
1155:
1152:(1–2): 1–42.
1151:
1147:
1146:Public Choice
1143:
1136:
1133:
1128:
1122:
1119:
1113:
1110:
1104:
1101:
1096:
1083:
1076:
1069:
1062:
1059:
1047:
1041:
1038:
1034:
1031:, ch. 1, pp.
1030:
1026:
1020:
1017:, 92(3), pp.
1016:
1012:
1006:
1003:
998:
991:
988:
983:
979:
973:
970:
965:
961:
955:
953:
949:
944:
937:
935:
933:
929:
926:
922:
918:
914:
908:
905:
902:
898:
894:
890:
887:
881:
875:
872:
869:
865:
861:
857:
852:
848:
843:
839:
836:and links to
835:
831:
828:
824:
820:
814:
810:
806:
802:
796:
793:
790:
786:
780:
777:
773:
769:
764:
760:
756:
750:
747:
744:
740:
737:
733:
729:
724:
720:
717:Reprinted in
716:
712:
707:
704:, 12(2), pp.
703:
699:
694:
690:
684:
680:
675:
671:
667:
661:
657:
651:
648:
644:
638:
635:
631:
628:, 92(2), pp.
627:
623:
619:
613:
610:
604:
601:
597:
593:
588:
585:, 21(4), pp.
584:
580:
574:
572:
570:
568:
566:
564:
562:
560:
556:
552:
546:
543:
540:
536:
530:
527:
521:
516:
515:Overdiagnosis
513:
511:
508:
506:
503:
501:
498:
496:
493:
491:
488:
486:
483:
481:
478:
476:
473:
471:
468:
466:
463:
461:
458:
457:
452:
447:
444:
441:
440:public sector
437:
434:
433:
432:
425:
423:
421:
417:
409:
407:
405:
401:
393:
391:
387:
385:
377:
375:
373:
365:
363:
360:
354:
352:
344:
342:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
319:
317:
312:
309:
307:
303:
299:
295:
293:
286:
284:
277:
272:
270:
267:
260:
258:
251:
249:
245:
243:
239:
235:
227:
225:
219:Policy myopia
218:
216:
209:
207:
200:
198:
191:
186:
184:
182:
178:
174:
173:public choice
170:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
149:Roland McKean
142:
141:
140:
138:
134:
129:
127:
118:
116:
114:
110:
106:
103:side and the
102:
98:
94:
90:
85:
83:
77:
73:
71:
67:
63:
59:
56:refers to an
55:
51:
44:
37:
33:
19:
1359:
1345:
1320:
1307:
1293:
1279:, 7(1), pp.
1276:
1266:
1249:
1246:Becker, Gary
1235:
1218:
1208:
1199:
1190:
1176:cite journal
1149:
1145:
1135:
1121:
1112:
1103:
1082:cite journal
1074:
1061:
1050:. Retrieved
1040:
1028:
1014:
1005:
996:
990:
981:
972:
963:
942:
920:
912:
907:
892:
888:
879:
874:
863:
859:
846:
822:
808:
804:
795:
784:
779:
767:
761:, 4(3), pp.
758:
749:
731:
718:
710:
701:
688:
681:, 4(3), pp.
678:
665:
655:
650:
637:
625:
617:
612:
603:
591:
582:
550:
545:
534:
529:
429:
413:
397:
388:
381:
369:
359:Black market
355:
348:
320:
313:
310:
302:Rent seeking
296:
290:
281:
264:
255:
246:
238:grey markets
231:
222:
213:
204:
195:
175:theory, and
147:
133:Ronald Coase
130:
122:
86:
78:
74:
53:
47:
36:Failed state
1129:. CFI Tean.
982:VOX Ukraine
897:Description
827:Description
774:World Bank.
670:Description
598:World Bank.
224:solutions.
62:free market
52:, the term
1377:Categories
1354:B0007H5TBG
1229:References
1052:2013-10-21
842:"failure".
537:, 30, pp.
400:Corruption
394:Corruption
325:, such as
287:Regulatory
1254:105–1109.
1252:, 1, pp.
1240:F632–F652
1168:153418774
917:Abstract.
868:Abstract.
851:Abstract.
789:Abstract.
715:Abstract.
693:Abstract.
1271:371–400.
1257:Archived
925:164–187.
901:preview.
891:(2002),
830:Archived
772:108–123.
739:Archived
730:(2006).
723:164–187.
596:108–123.
587:423–442.
453:See also
335:monopoly
273:Examples
1019:547–609
500:Statism
119:History
1366:
1352:
1314:
1300:
1281:27–39.
1166:
1033:11–23.
889:et al.
840:and
770:, pp.
674:links.
594:, pp.
539:44–56.
404:bribes
105:supply
101:demand
1164:S2CID
1071:(PDF)
763:9–23.
736:Link.
706:3–22.
683:25–39
662:–139.
645:–506.
632:–443.
522:Notes
382:Most
321:Many
1364:ISBN
1350:ASIN
1312:ISBN
1298:ISBN
1182:link
1095:help
923:pp.
815:218.
813:195–
721:pp.
370:The
304:and
91:and
1331:by
1154:doi
1150:164
660:107
643:496
630:438
607:Id.
418:'s
1379::
1217:.
1198:.
1178:}}
1174:{{
1162:.
1148:.
1144:.
1086::
1084:}}
1080:{{
1009:•
980:.
962:.
951:^
931:^
799:•
753:•
577:•
558:^
171:,
167:,
163:,
159:,
139::
1242:.
1221:.
1202:.
1184:)
1170:.
1156::
1097:)
1093:(
1055:.
1021:.
999:.
984:.
945:.
685:.
45:.
38:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.