433:. That is the standard for all articles trying to get FA status. The peer review will review the entire article, piece by piece, with a fine-tooth comb. It's a crazy process (trust me, I know), but one that is required to make sure the article can stand up to the test of an FAC. As the GA reviewer, I will be glad to help with the editing, but won't be able to peer review it or review it for FA. Well done to all who edited the article. :) -
410:
384:
350:
293:
269:
247:
225:
192:
162:
136:
77:
55:
182:, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
179:
240:
Topic was clearly addressed, efforts to address other related topics (fracking, the telephone congesting angle, etc.) were made but did not overstep the entire article.
64:
102:
367:
106:
98:
90:
397:
94:
279:
112:
In the lede, it is generally doesn't need to be sourced, just the first mention of that information within the actual article.
201:
377:
The placement of the images was corrected from last time. Neither the images nor the video file are "squishing" the text.
359:
152:
17:
371:
171:
175:
86:
363:
256:
121:
441:
306:
234:
393:
425:
Passed and promoted! Your next step would be
Featured Article Status. Before heading over to
435:
144:. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
336:
332:
447:
340:
283:: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
145:
32:
426:
430:
255:. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
305:: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
70:
Is as well written, concise, to the point as the first review.
185:
You have plenty of in-line sources all from reliable sources.
262:
There wasn't any unnecessary detail in any one section.
286:
Found everything to be neutral and in line with NPOV.
207:
I did not see any original research in the article.
403:Captions are suitable for the images/videos shown.
65:understandable to an appropriately broad audience
312:I did not see any ongoing edit wars, just some
8:
316:minor vandalism from vandal-only accounts.
155:and all references are updated and live.
25:
7:
67:; spelling and grammar are correct.
63:. the prose is clear, concise, and
24:
408:
382:
348:
291:
267:
245:
223:
190:
160:
134:
75:
53:
180:could reasonably be challenged
1:
368:valid non-free use rationales
18:Talk:2011 Virginia earthquake
448:07:34, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
409:
383:
349:
292:
268:
246:
224:
191:
161:
135:
76:
54:
467:
319:
210:
146:the layout style guideline
115:
40:
27:
320:
211:
116:
41:
31:
28:
396:to the topic, and have
85:. it complies with the
429:, would recommend a
216:Broad in its coverage
309:or content dispute.
202:no original research
127:no original research
233:. it addresses the
178:. All content that
420:Overall assessment
364:copyright statuses
327:, if possible, by
107:list incorporation
454:
453:
450:
398:suitable captions
370:are provided for
153:Checklinks review
458:
444:
438:
434:
412:
411:
386:
385:
372:non-free content
352:
351:
295:
294:
271:
270:
249:
248:
227:
226:
194:
193:
172:reliable sources
164:
163:
138:
137:
79:
78:
57:
56:
26:
466:
465:
461:
460:
459:
457:
456:
455:
442:
436:
89:guidelines for
87:Manual of Style
37:Review Comment
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
464:
462:
452:
451:
423:
413:
405:
404:
401:
387:
379:
378:
375:
353:
345:
344:
318:
317:
310:
296:
288:
287:
284:
272:
264:
263:
260:
250:
242:
241:
238:
237:of the topic.
228:
220:
219:
209:
208:
205:
200:. it contains
195:
187:
186:
183:
165:
157:
156:
149:
139:
131:
130:
114:
113:
110:
99:words to watch
80:
72:
71:
68:
58:
50:
49:
39:
38:
35:
30:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
463:
449:
445:
439:
432:
428:
424:
421:
417:
414:
407:
406:
402:
399:
395:
391:
388:
381:
380:
376:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
354:
347:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
323:
315:
311:
308:
304:
300:
297:
290:
289:
285:
282:
281:
276:
273:
266:
265:
261:
258:
257:summary style
254:
251:
244:
243:
239:
236:
232:
229:
222:
221:
217:
214:
206:
203:
199:
196:
189:
188:
184:
181:
177:
173:
169:
166:
159:
158:
154:
150:
147:
143:
140:
133:
132:
128:
124:
123:
119:
111:
108:
104:
100:
96:
92:
91:lead sections
88:
84:
81:
74:
73:
69:
66:
62:
59:
52:
51:
47:
44:
36:
34:
19:
437:Neutralhomer
419:
415:
392:. media are
389:
358:. media are
355:
328:
324:
321:
313:
302:
298:
278:
274:
252:
235:main aspects
230:
215:
212:
197:
176:cited inline
167:
151:Did a third
141:
126:
120:
117:
82:
60:
46:Well-written
45:
42:
431:peer review
362:with their
325:Illustrated
122:Verifiable
33:Attribute
394:relevant
331:such as
307:edit war
280:Neutral
103:fiction
427:WP:FAC
366:, and
360:tagged
333:images
303:Stable
105:, and
95:layout
341:audio
339:, or
337:video
329:media
125:with
29:Rate
16:<
443:Talk
314:VERY
174:are
259:).
446:•
440:•
422:.
418:.
400:.
390:6b
374:.
356:6a
343::
335:,
322:6.
301:.
277:.
253:3b
231:3a
218::
213:3.
204:.
198:2c
170:.
168:2b
148:.
142:2a
129::
118:2.
109:.
101:,
97:,
93:,
83:1b
61:1a
48::
43:1.
416:7
299:5
275:4
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.