717:
the quote's introductory text.) Unless and until it passes peer review, it might not deserve to be included in the article at all. Therefore, if it is included, it certainly should not be several times longer than the rest of the article's cited research. If anyone here concurs, please feel free to remove or significantly shorten the quoted passage of text. Second, it appears that there are many studies with results that shed positive light on the subject, but surely there must be some findings that are negative, or at least constructively critique the subject, right? If not, then I suspect most research being performed on CernySmith's reliability, validity, value, etc. isn't truly conducted by neutral and dispassionate observers, but rather by CernySmith enthusiasts possessing the potential to suffer observer bias. If most people are motivated to research CernySmith because they already think it has predictive potential, they are statistically likely to reach foregone conclusions more positive than negative. That notwithstanding, I suggest this article would benefit from the balance added through cited research or published evaluation that is't 100% flattering to the subject (if any exists.) IMHO, y'know.
243:
222:
446:
303:
428:
392:
340:
191:
354:
329:
456:
716:
Hi. Just passing through. Sometimes I randomly comment on article issues, and there appear to be couple with this one. They could be divided into two sections here on Talk but I'll keep them together for brevity. First, the very, very long quote is an excerpt from unpublished research (according to
153:
293:
365:. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the
750:
606:
311:
147:
780:
502:
658:
654:
640:
44:
765:
745:
508:
366:
361:
334:
283:
79:
785:
755:
607:
https://web.archive.org/web/20140211022840/http://www.cernysmith.com:80/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/CSAI-Cerny-Smith-Ritschard-Dodd-ICF-2007.pdf
600:
478:
259:
85:
775:
740:
718:
770:
610:
168:
586:
135:
469:
433:
250:
227:
99:
30:
558:
104:
20:
760:
74:
701:
410:
202:
129:
65:
125:
657:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
722:
175:
692:
601:
http://www.cernysmith.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/The-CSAI-An-Expatriate-On-Field-Adjustment-Index....pdf
542:
109:
676:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
664:
572:
534:
208:
24:
541:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
339:
631:
190:
161:
141:
55:
477:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
258:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
611:
http://www.cernysmith.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/CSAI-Cerny-Smith-Ritschard-Dodd-ICF-2007.pdf
594:
580:
566:
552:
70:
661:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
677:
587:
http://www.cernysmith.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Research_CSA-Professional-Article-2008.pdf
461:
51:
404:
684:
559:
http://www.cernysmith.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Cross-Cultural-Adjustment-Stresses.pdf
643:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
242:
221:
683:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
734:
302:
726:
706:
650:
445:
427:
400:
649:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
474:
451:
391:
255:
573:
http://www.cernysmith.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/csaicodebook.pdf
353:
328:
184:
15:
616:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
390:
301:
545:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
538:
160:
399:
This article was accepted on 18 May 2012 by reviewer
473:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
254:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
653:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
507:This article has not yet received a rating on the
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
639:This message was posted before February 2018.
174:
8:
751:Physiology articles about an unassessed area
375:Knowledge:WikiProject Articles for creation
533:I have just modified one external link on
422:
378:Template:WikiProject Articles for creation
359:This article was reviewed by member(s) of
323:
216:
424:
325:
218:
188:
781:Unknown-importance psychology articles
628:to let others know (documentation at
7:
467:This article is within the scope of
248:This article is within the scope of
766:AfC submissions by date/18 May 2012
207:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
746:Mid-importance Physiology articles
14:
537:. Please take a moment to review
362:WikiProject Articles for creation
487:Knowledge:WikiProject Psychology
454:
444:
426:
352:
338:
327:
268:Knowledge:WikiProject Physiology
241:
220:
189:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
786:WikiProject Psychology articles
756:WikiProject Physiology articles
490:Template:WikiProject Psychology
288:This article has been rated as
271:Template:WikiProject Physiology
1:
707:17:11, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
481:and see a list of open tasks.
262:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
712:Unpublished Research and POV
776:C-Class psychology articles
741:C-Class Physiology articles
312:has not yet been associated
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
802:
727:04:04, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
670:(last update: 5 June 2024)
530:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
509:project's importance scale
506:
439:
398:
347:
309:
287:
236:
215:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
771:Accepted AfC submissions
526:External links modified
314:with a particular area.
470:WikiProject Psychology
395:
306:
251:WikiProject Physiology
197:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
535:CernySmith Assessment
394:
372:Articles for creation
369:for more information.
335:Articles for creation
305:
100:Neutral point of view
25:CernySmith Assessment
761:C-Class AfC articles
651:regular verification
105:No original research
641:After February 2018
620:parameter below to
493:psychology articles
274:Physiology articles
695:InternetArchiveBot
646:InternetArchiveBot
396:
307:
203:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
671:
523:
522:
519:
518:
515:
514:
462:Psychology portal
421:
420:
417:
416:
322:
321:
318:
317:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
793:
705:
696:
669:
668:
647:
635:
598:
584:
570:
556:
495:
494:
491:
488:
485:
464:
459:
458:
457:
448:
441:
440:
430:
423:
383:
382:
379:
376:
373:
356:
349:
348:
343:
342:
341:
331:
324:
294:importance scale
276:
275:
272:
269:
266:
245:
238:
237:
232:
224:
217:
200:
194:
193:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
801:
800:
796:
795:
794:
792:
791:
790:
731:
730:
714:
699:
694:
662:
655:have permission
645:
629:
592:
578:
564:
550:
543:this simple FaQ
528:
492:
489:
486:
483:
482:
460:
455:
453:
380:
377:
374:
371:
370:
337:
273:
270:
267:
264:
263:
230:
201:on Knowledge's
198:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
799:
797:
789:
788:
783:
778:
773:
768:
763:
758:
753:
748:
743:
733:
732:
719:49.228.245.135
713:
710:
689:
688:
681:
614:
613:
605:Added archive
603:
589:
575:
561:
527:
524:
521:
520:
517:
516:
513:
512:
505:
499:
498:
496:
479:the discussion
466:
465:
449:
437:
436:
431:
419:
418:
415:
414:
397:
387:
386:
384:
357:
345:
344:
332:
320:
319:
316:
315:
308:
298:
297:
290:Mid-importance
286:
280:
279:
277:
260:the discussion
246:
234:
233:
231:Mid‑importance
225:
213:
212:
206:
195:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
798:
787:
784:
782:
779:
777:
774:
772:
769:
767:
764:
762:
759:
757:
754:
752:
749:
747:
744:
742:
739:
738:
736:
729:
728:
724:
720:
711:
709:
708:
703:
698:
697:
686:
682:
679:
675:
674:
673:
666:
660:
656:
652:
648:
642:
637:
633:
627:
623:
619:
612:
608:
604:
602:
596:
590:
588:
582:
576:
574:
568:
562:
560:
554:
548:
547:
546:
544:
540:
536:
531:
525:
510:
504:
501:
500:
497:
480:
476:
472:
471:
463:
452:
450:
447:
443:
442:
438:
435:
432:
429:
425:
412:
409:
406:
402:
393:
389:
388:
385:
368:
364:
363:
358:
355:
351:
350:
346:
336:
333:
330:
326:
313:
310:This article
304:
300:
299:
295:
291:
285:
282:
281:
278:
261:
257:
253:
252:
247:
244:
240:
239:
235:
229:
226:
223:
219:
214:
210:
204:
196:
192:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
715:
693:
690:
665:source check
644:
638:
625:
621:
617:
615:
532:
529:
468:
407:
381:AfC articles
367:project page
360:
289:
249:
209:WikiProjects
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
632:Sourcecheck
148:free images
31:not a forum
735:Categories
702:Report bug
484:Psychology
475:Psychology
434:Psychology
265:Physiology
256:Physiology
228:Physiology
685:this tool
678:this tool
595:dead link
581:dead link
567:dead link
553:dead link
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
691:Cheers.—
411:contribs
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
618:checked
599:tag to
585:tag to
571:tag to
557:tag to
539:my edit
292:on the
199:C-class
154:WP refs
142:scholar
626:failed
591:Added
577:Added
563:Added
549:Added
401:Pol430
205:scale.
126:Google
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
723:talk
622:true
405:talk
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
659:RfC
636:).
624:or
609:to
503:???
284:Mid
176:TWL
737::
725:)
672:.
667:}}
663:{{
634:}}
630:{{
597:}}
593:{{
583:}}
579:{{
569:}}
565:{{
555:}}
551:{{
413:).
156:)
54:;
721:(
704:)
700:(
687:.
680:.
511:.
408:·
403:(
296:.
211::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
