103:
85:
54:
21:
160:
The article certainly needs improvement and expansion, but as a significant inspirational force and at the forefront of the movement at its beginnings, it would be a denial of knowledge not to acknowledge this band. The article needs improvement, not deletion. I would appeal to fans and rock
261:
I'm not edit warring I'm just editing
Knowledge (XXG), I've changed a few American bands from Are to Is. I've changed a few UK bands from is to are. it's not a war, it's just a minor change to make the articles follow the convention we're using more consistently. Not a war at all.
247:
has been edit-warring about this, which is a separate problem. It does not mean other editors should deliberately insert errors, when he is using the correct terminology. -
224:
288:
35:
182:
293:
157:
I see that someone has proposed this article for deletion. This clearly has been done by someone not familiar with the genre of NWOBHM.
119:
65:
110:
90:
27:
186:
71:
53:
267:
213:
178:
118:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
20:
263:
244:
209:
31:
252:
115:
201:
convention in BrE is to treat bands as a collective plural noun. See feature articles like
162:
161:
journalists au fait with the NWOBHM to augment and strengthen the case for this article.
282:
248:
234:
202:
230:
102:
84:
205:
225:
Comparison of
American and British English#Formal and notional agreement
238:
47:
15:
271:
256:
217:
190:
165:
114:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
8:
51:
79:
81:
241:came from Manchester, were is correct.
7:
108:This article is within the scope of
70:It is of interest to the following
237:etc. all use the plural were. As
14:
208:for a well established precedent.
128:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Metal
289:Start-Class Heavy Metal articles
101:
83:
52:
19:
26:This article was nominated for
166:16:37, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
1:
122:and see a list of open tasks.
272:17:08, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
257:16:59, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
218:01:46, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
310:
294:WikiProject Metal articles
223:The actual guidance is at
131:Template:WikiProject Metal
96:
78:
191:10:11, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
60:This article is rated
64:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
175:The band was crap.
134:Heavy Metal articles
243:I understand that
66:content assessment
181:comment added by
150:
149:
146:
145:
142:
141:
116:heavy metal music
111:WikiProject Metal
46:
45:
301:
193:
136:
135:
132:
129:
126:
105:
98:
97:
87:
80:
63:
57:
56:
48:
34:. The result of
23:
16:
309:
308:
304:
303:
302:
300:
299:
298:
279:
278:
199:
176:
173:
155:
133:
130:
127:
124:
123:
61:
12:
11:
5:
307:
305:
297:
296:
291:
281:
280:
277:
276:
275:
274:
242:
229:UK bands like
228:
198:
195:
183:86.156.136.243
172:
169:
154:
151:
148:
147:
144:
143:
140:
139:
137:
120:the discussion
106:
94:
93:
88:
76:
75:
69:
58:
44:
43:
36:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
306:
295:
292:
290:
287:
286:
284:
273:
269:
265:
264:Bryce Carmony
260:
259:
258:
254:
250:
246:
245:Bryce Carmony
240:
236:
232:
226:
222:
221:
220:
219:
215:
211:
210:Bryce Carmony
207:
204:
196:
194:
192:
188:
184:
180:
170:
168:
167:
164:
158:
152:
138:
121:
117:
113:
112:
107:
104:
100:
99:
95:
92:
89:
86:
82:
77:
73:
67:
59:
55:
50:
49:
41:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
235:Led Zeppelin
200:
174:
159:
156:
109:
72:WikiProjects
40:no consensus
39:
203:the Beatles
197:Was vs Were
177:—Preceding
62:Start-class
283:Categories
231:Pink Floyd
163:Headshaker
32:2006-09-27
206:the Kinks
179:unsigned
153:Untitled
28:deletion
249:Arjayay
239:A II Z
68:scale.
125:Metal
91:Metal
268:talk
253:talk
214:talk
187:talk
171:Crap
38:was
30:on
285::
270:)
255:)
233:,
216:)
189:)
266:(
251:(
227:.
212:(
185:(
74::
42:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
