Knowledge

Talk:AutoHotkey

Source 📝

1756:"First and formost this must not turn into a public bashing. we should not spam threads in either site promoting one or the other. a public battle only hurts everyone. In the end no descision has been made final about the end state of autohotkey.com should Poly comply. it is desired to convert the current forum to PHPBB3 and lock it as a permanent archive and point autohotkey.com to this forum. but that is a premature discussion. First we have to get the domain and content ownership transfered to the AutoHotkey Foundation LLC. and then we can publicly discuss a final state. Untill such an ownersip transfer occurs things are they are is really the the only state of things that there are. we will remain 2 domains servicing the same users." 2110:
creator of "AHK_L" (Lexikos). AHK v2 is therefore directly related to AHK_L and IS currently being considered to be official by EVERYONE here. Now, it seems to me that by denying AHK v1.1 to be "official", you are being delusional. No? Furthermore, ahkscript.org is "considered" to be official by the original creator and by the AHK_L creator. By refusing this, it seems like "putting words in the creators' mouths." If anyone feels that AHK v2 is not "official" then should not it be removed also? Anyhow, just as the case of AHK v2, whether ahkscript.org is "official" or not, it should still be (mentioned at minimum) on this wiki page.
2614:. You can relatively quickly mock up a prototype that shows how a program would function and actually demonstrate it and test it with users. It won't be fast and perhaps it won't be accurate either, but it can show if the whole idea makes enough sense to program it in another language where making a prototype would take maybe 10 or 30 times as long but where the language has other wanted properties like stability, speed, precision, platform-independence, and many others. I'm just guessing, because the bullet text is not clear at all, but that's the explanation my brain gave me. If that was the meaning, the bullet should say " 1735:"The nickel version is many of us were unhappy with forum software changes forum and site administration policies and when these oppinions were voiced entire threads were deleted as well as moderators getting stripped of priviledges. we came here, contacted chris proposed the idea of an LLC to own Autohotkey.com who agreed with the idea so long as he wouldnt be required to do anything but had some sort of emergency power if ti goes awry again. we have been applying various means of descreet preasute on Poly for some time now. he has began discussing a hand over and promised one. but the battle is on going. 369: 1586:? How many forks does it have? Is each fork notable? Does each fork's project page have its own article? The only reason a fork of the original has its own article is because the fork is itself notable. This product is the same. It is notable, but any new fork would have to have sufficient notability of its own to merit an article. Also, a fork cannot simply hijack this article and claim to be the new AutoHotkey or the heir to the name without proof, particularly when the reference that is used to supports its existence indicates it's fork of the product. 1684:
call it that. Instead, ahkscript.org was simply a way to ensure that AutoHotkey doesn't simply disappear from the internet one day and to provide a reliable place where the community could be active without censorship. And although the current build of AutoHotkey was once a fork of the original creator's version of AutoHotkey, the two branches have since been consolidated, the "fork" declared the official version, and development on the original version has ceased completely (even for bug fixes) (this happened four of five years ago). --
2217:... And the stable release is v1.1.15.00 which is AHK_L... and the Preview release is also technically AHK_L... They all link to ahkscript.org one way or another... If we are going to keep to this "idea", then it means that the preview release shouldn't be there, nor should stable release be v1.1.15.00... it should be v1.0.45.08 ... Somehow, the article is saying that ahkscript.org and AHK_L is "official"... even if we are saying it isn't... So, which way are we going here? ... 2131:
first product ceased to exist when the second started and all that happened was that there was change of ownership. If it's the former, as is the case with a lot of open source software, one group stopped modifying the source code and another group took over the work on the product and continued using the same name. If it's the former, the original creator holds no rights to the software or its name and the new product took over the name and eventually changed it.
281: 250: 349: 219: 190: 1635:
link should be changed. It might be helpful for more information about the split to be added to the article itself, so that a new reader would have some clarity about the state of the project, but I'm not sure how to do that in the context of Knowledge policies (notability, reliable citations, etc.), as it is mostly forum chatter we're talking about. --
2157:. In other words, each product needs to have its own article. The original meets notability guidelines while the fork (or branch as Mallett calls it) needs to create a new article, not try to co-opt this article. We place a hatnote at the top of both and point to the other. We can even mention them in the article and it can link back to the other. 1601:
and also that the old site owner has recognized the current active developer. In other words, I don't think that the original site ownership in and of itself determines who is official and who is not (I'm not sure what would, other than who has legal ownership of the name AutoHotKey (in whatever regulatory regime applies)). --
2618:
before implementing in another, more time consuming programming language." Why use AutoHotkey for prototyping, you might ask? Well, maybe if the specific program you want to prototype is close to the core of what AutoHotkey does well, such as handling hotkeys, hotstrings, contexts, windows, graphical
2591:, once in AutoHotkey and then again in C++ or Pascal. The final implementation would have to be tested anyhow; why go through the process more than once? Why would a programmer's supervisor permit such a waste of time? And why introduce the possibility of mistranslating from one language to another? 1894:
Domain Name:AHKSCRIPT.ORG Creation Date: 2013-10-17T00:56:55Z Updated Date: 2013-12-16T03:46:20Z Registry Expiry Date: 2018-10-17T00:56:55Z Registrant Name:Registration Private Registrant Organization:Domains By Proxy, LLC Registrant Street: DomainsByProxy.com Registrant City:Scottsdale
1890:
Domain Name: AUTO-HOTKEY.COM Creation Date: 28-sep-2013 Updated Date: 28-sep-2013 Expiration Date: 28-sep-2014 Registrant Name: charles simmons Registrant Organization: Battleboard games Registrant Street: 16105 beechwood Registrant City: charlestown Registrant State/Province: Indiana
1600:
Generally, I'm going to agree with Walter. My only comment would be that what determines the "official site" for a project like this would have to come down to Intellectual Property rights in the software. I believe that one of the original authors/maintainers of the project did move to the new site,
904:
I keep adding objections because the content is so objectionable on so many fronts I can simply pick more at random to add to the flaming pile of feces that you want to add. Sometimes it just better to accept the opinion of a neutral pagewatcher who edits hundreds of articles a day than to cajole and
580:
If not, could you propose a different change? Otherwise, the entire History section might as well be removed too... It is then incomplete and irrelevant, it's history without key facts, details ... I don't understand. Please elaborate. Why is simply always removing information "the" choice? This page
567:
was founded (April 24th 2014 in Indiana, USA) to prevent monetization, ensure the continuing existence of the software AutoHotkey and naturally, continue the support for it. This foundation provides organizational, legal, and financial support for this software. It is a volunteer organization created
515:
Not to poke at old wounds... the forking of AutoIt seems to be shrouded in fog, and maybe it's better that way. Still, those two events seem pretty significant, and one wonders if there's any chance they could be related. Eventually one stumbles across the AutoIt Developer Chat forum and finds out
3102:
I agree that it's not the best example and a much simpler one could be used. I just added another example (QuoteSelection), mostly to have more to choose from for discussing and comparing, but "my" example isn't impressive either. I just tried to keep it understandable for most people not acquainted
2256:
Yes, that is true. I am an administrator on both autohotkey.com and ahkscript.org. Everything has been migrated back to autohotkey.com (and should be used over ahkscript.org). That said, most ahkscript.org links now redirect to autohotkey.com anyhow. Right now, ahkscript.org is more used for the AHK
2109:
I don't understand how something can not be official when the original creator himself (Chris Mallett) now claims "AHK_L" as the official branch. Also, by putting the "preview release" link we are all technically agreeing that v2 is an "official" in-dev version of autohotkey. That said, v2 is by the
1988:
ownership, so there will be no fork, the develop and versioning will switch to Autohotkey_L 1.1 on the same site. This should be the best solution. If the fork happen, nothing bad, in my opinion also in this case we should explain with a little note that a fork happened and that the other repository
1886:
Domain Name: AUTOHOTKEY.COM Creation Date: 29-dec-2003 Updated Date: 18-oct-2013 Expiration Date: 29-dec-2015 Registrant Name: THE SECRETARY Registrant Organization: DEQUEUE LTD, C/O TAXASSIST ACCOUNTANTS Registrant Street: CHANCERY STATION HOUSE Registrant Street: 31-33 HIGH HOLBORN
1634:
has the weight of history (and search engine visibility), plus their forums are still quite active. Additionally, there has been talk on the new site forums about rapproachment between the owner of the original site and the maintainers of the new one. So, for now, I don't feel that the official site
1335:
be sourced. The stuff about forking from AutoIt in the History section is not necessary for this article and I have removed it. Forking, in this instance, implies something other than a conceptual split of the author of this program from AutoIt in terms of programmatic aims (as previous discussion
1021:
Criterion 3 is verifiability through independent sources. This is the sticking point. While primary sources can be used to support factual statements in articles, I would expect them to be used to supplement secondary sources. The lack of these independent sources means that I'm calling it a fail on
1683:
Also, for those of you calling ahkscript.org a "fork" of autohotkey.com, the members of the community are one and the same on each site (with exceptions obviously, such as people who have been long absent) and many are active on each site, so even though it might technically be a "fork", I wouldn't
3086:
I somewhat agree with the point being made, but I believe that omitting the example is not the better option. It may seem like the easier lazy solution, but we can’t expect the reader to understand everything offhand. That’s why we have links to other pages, dictionaries, simple English wiki, “the
2130:
I'm sorry you don't understand. Let me explain it to you by asking a question: is AHK_L a continuation of AutoHotkey or is one a fork of the other? If it's the former, a continuation, it's like a lot of programs that change ownership and I'm full of crap and should shut up. If it's the former, the
1831:
This is why I hate Knowledge sometimes. People like you who essentially impede the evolution of any page for incorrect reasons, despite evidence enough that those reasons are false. That description was chosen in part not to create a battle with the old site, and in no way means that it is a "fan"
1485:
Currently, both sites continue to co-exist, with the vast majority of activity occurring at ahkscript.org. The official developer has moved all download links to ahkscript.org, has updated all links in the offline documentation to ahkscript.org, and has stated that he will follow the wishes of the
1462:
was the original AutoHotkey website that changed hands in 2010 from the original creator of AutoHotkey to a volunteer member of the community. In the past one to two years, this member (who has full ownership of the site) has began to not maintain the site, has been difficult to contact, no longer
1327:
This article was in desperate need of some cleaning up which I have done to some extent; ultimately it should be looking at an entire rewrite but it's decent enough for now. I also removed some links and converted them to references and added Help manual references for better explanation on some
572:
Particularly, "The administration of the official site has had many changes over its history."; the mention of the change in administration was on the page for over a year. It is part of the reason why the official branch changed. Why is it no longer encyclopedic (a collection of information on a
2076:
So you're saying that the fork is now more popular than the original version. Isn't that sort of like the ongoing saga of OpenOffice and a dozen other open source products? Each fork must have its own article. Each fork must show its own notability. No riding on the coattails of another version.
919:
I am not sure why the addition or removal of the material seems to be springing such a debate with vigour from whatever front. I am not sure, so to speak, that the somewhat coarse language is necessary here ... I don't think this is appropriate or objective at all ... Whatever the final outcome,
1775:
If by your definition ahkscript.org is a "fan" site, then so is autohotkey.com since the two sites are essentially one and the same apart from who is in control, and hence neither site should be listed. Both provide a download page, a forum, and online documentation. But since autohotkey.com is
1673:
and that at some point in time the two websites will be officially consolidated under the domain autohotkey.com, but until that changeover happens (which will likely take quite a while) it is important that the Knowledge page remain accurate. It's also worth mentioning that nobody owns the name
426:
Well, for ease of use reasons, one can easily transform an AutoIt v2 script into an AutoHotkey one. Like AutoIt v2, AutoHotkey uses a syntax similar to the Microsoft ScriptIt syntax, but AutoHotkey is way more powerful than AutoIt v2 was. AutoHotkey uses this 'simple' syntax and is open source.
753:, "every other source out there simply refers back to the official website," so apparently he/she has found a significant number. Speaking as a non-historian, I find it quite significant that non-monetization should be one of a foundation's founding principles. I have to doubt that I'm alone. 657:, "A primary source may be used on Knowledge only to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge." Why isn't the passage in question permitted under this standard? 2639:
I removed the following example that didn't work (obviously, as it clears the clipboard as the first thing) and also is very fragile and poorly explained. I am moving it here to the talk pages in case someone wants to correct it, test it, and make it more robust. Also, it probably belongs on
531:... This open-source model didn't work. Sure, it got a lot of good developers to join, but it also caused a very bad bastard child to be born which turned around and not only started biting the hand that fed it but is gnawing around at about the elbow, now. Something has to be done about it. 1031:
Because of that, I'm inclined to call the proposed addition insufficiently notable for inclusion in the article. Perhaps a one-sentence statement to the effect of "Since 2014, AutoHotKey has been supported by the AutoHotKeyFoundation, LLC" would work - it's a statement of fact that I'd feel
748:
Though competent at Wikitext and AutoHotkey, I'm not now "in the tech world", having retired from computer programming in 2002, prior to the first Autohotkey beta. I'm more of an "average reader", but I believe that Knowledge is largely aimed at such readers. According to
405:
Questions the article might answer... How can AutoHotkey be backwards compatible with AutoIt v2 without copyright infringement? Why v2 and not v3? Why compatibility with AutoIt at all? Why not a completely independent scripting language capable of achieving the same goals?
1959:
as official site just below 1.1.13.01 / 4 May 2014; 36 days ago as last Stable release that come from the fork. Did you understood what I wrote: "the last version showed in the article square box should be changed, and last modification date should back to 5 year ago"
427:
AutoIt v3 uses Basic-ish syntax and is closed source. Try both, decide for yourself, both AutoHotkey and AutoIt v3 can deliver a lot. It would probably only depend on your specific need and your preferred taste or prior knowledge of syntax, which you'll use the most.
1421: 581:
is very bare... Why all the negative commits, a submission for deletion? Why would this subject be irrelevant or too insignificant if it has been used by companies such Dreamworks, IBM and Intel. I am not interested in any "edit war", I just was want to understand.
1328:
things within the article; if these are not correct in implementation, please let me know. I also cleaned up the examples a little and added a couple more just to give an idea of the simplicity of the language, which is a distinguishing feature of the program.
1832:
site. And both sites were created "by a number of enthusiasts". AHK is not a company like Mozilla, and both sites exist exclusively for "enthusiasts". But I can see that I'm discoursing with a brick wall, so I'm not going to even bother trying anymore.
1339:
In its place in the History section I have added information about two other programmers within the AutoHotkey community who have created their own versions of the program, as these would appear to be more relevant to the article and clearly verifiable.
2392:
I do not care about the dispute that seems to be going on in their community. So resolve this however you want, but please keep this page consistent. I expect to find the release specified in the infobox on the website specified in the infobox.
948:
Oh not at all, I have read through all of it. I personally just don't think this is worth the time to look into every detail. If it's disapproved, it's disapproved. I just don't think saying "flaming pile of feces" was objectively necessary.
887:
I do note that, in your latest response, you add an objection not previously made. You keep doing that. I don't, however, see why a discussion of a software product must exclude information about a website dedicated to its maintenance and
3301: 1422:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:v_m_YmM1S1gJ:www.autohotkey.com/board/topic/97626-autohotkey-state-the-forum-poly-and-myself-the-short-story/page-8+&cd=1&hl=fr&ct=clnk&gl=fr&client=firefox-a
2179:
I see what you mean. Ok, then I shall start a new page for AHK_L. One last thing... Shouldn't the v2 link be removed? Anyway, is it better to have a section or a new page? I don't want to confuse the readers... What do you think?
1625:
After recently reviewing the AHK sites and community forums, I concluded that the project and community as a whole is still too much in disarray to merit a change of "official site". The development clearly is centered around the
3219:
I noticed that most of this article's references are to AutoHotkey's own website or their forum. Relatively few of them are to independent sources. Unless the consensus is otherwise, I will flag the article with {{third-party}}.
675:
about the company, not a a series of straightforward, descriptive statements. If the information were of interest to anyone else in he tech world, they would have written about it, wouldn't they? Yet no cares. It's essentially a
610:. I won't be discussing other articles. And there's no need to link to me or ping me. This article is on my watchlist because of previous edit wars that have happened here due to the two sides who want to push their preferred 2586:
is "Quick code testing before implementing in another (more time consuming) programming language." I retired from computer programming 16 years ago and many things have changed, but I can't see the point in coding a routine
2060:
the impression is that the owner 'POLYETHENE@AUTOHOTKEY.NET' of domain 'autohotkey.com' is not mantaining the web site, the community moved all to ahkscript.org, so probably also the official domain just today should be
378: 264: 3087:
handbook of chemistry and physics” jk and whatnot. Perhaps, changing the example to something more known would be better, but I would rather leave this example in the meantime at least until a better one is chosen. -
3068:
is. Since the relevant article is linked, this would not be a fault if understanding this concept would deepen ones' understanding of AutoHotkey, the matter under consideration; it is, however, pretty irrelevant.
1017:
Criterion 2 is promotional language; the originally proposed text doesn't seem too promotional to me, though I'm very leery of the "by the community, for the community" quote. It could be revised to meet this
153: 1463:
frequents the site and no longer maintains an interest in AutoHotkey, and whose words and actions implied that he may at any time shut down the site, but is not willing to pass off ownership to anybody else.
528:
A certain "other" open-source project was started because a ... was unintentionally ignored by Jon so he goes off and starts his own language and leeches off both the success of AutoIt and the code base. ...
1004:- I haven't seen any discussion of significant coverage in reliable third-party sources. If someone does have a source like that, then the following thoughts are moot - just source it to the reliable source. 2134:
However, the former is not what the sources, or the original creator, say has happened and so it's the latter case. The sources say that AHK_L is a branch, or more correctly, a fork of the original product.
963:
Hi! 3O here. Just so I'm clear, the disagreement is about whether to include the information from the bulleted section at the top starting with "The administration of the official site...," correct?
3296: 383: 1797:"community founded by a number of enthusiasts" argues against that it's an official site for anything other than fans of the product. Official websites are not created by "a number of enthusiasts". 1859:
I'm sorry you hate Knowledge, but I'm not impeding the evolution of this or any page. The product page is clear and the site you want to link to is not the official page. It's fork or a fan page.
3281: 1348:
Avoid it to preserve your sanity. Inconsistent language/library. For example: Click %x%,%y% while MouseClick Left,x,y . Another is string vs. expression assignment and variable expansion etc.
3291: 1532:
As of today, the front page reads "Welcome to AHKScript.org, a new community founded by a number of enthusiasts to promote the use of AutoHotkey." Now the page reads like it's a fan site. See
1926:
is 1.1.13.01 and comprise many new functions and is continually updated. Probably this become the continuation. Maybe an explanation note should be added to the article to avoid confusion.--
684:
and is not needed. Fans can read the changelog at the site if they're interested. There were also incorrect uses of inline external links, incorrect date formatting and a violation of
3072:
Alternatively, we could just drop the example. The article does not need to — indeed, cannot — illustrate all of Autohotkey's features, and functions are one that could be omitted.
1728:
I did read that, and that's exactly my point: ahkscript.org is not a fan site. It is one of two official sites. Here's the short story of why ahkscript.org was created, in the
1167:
Creffpublic indicated that it would be reasonable to add a one-sentence summary of the non-notable organization and, using common sense, could be sourced with a primary source.
3306: 724:
well summarizes the policy: "Avoid creating lists of miscellaneous information." The paragraph in question is not a list; it consists of four closely interrelated sentences.
628:
I see, understood. Thanks, much appreciated! It will be difficult to find other sources since every other source out there simply refers back to the official website... e.g.
1898:
unfortunately it is not a virtuous system to keep the identity of the owner of a domain hidden, such as is done by the companies that sell illegal drugs, spammers etc. .. --
147: 2524: 2520: 2506: 1941:
If you think that it's not clear that the version at ahkscript.org isn't a fork of the product and will have different versioning and ownership, you're confused.
1260: 1238: 934:
If you're not sure why the addition is problematic, you haven't been paying attention. I am being respectful of the editors, but the content is owed no respect.
3276: 1466:
In light of these happenings and unwilling to continue battling with the domain owner of autohotkey.com, another site was setup temporarily by the community at
1336:
has made clear). There are no known reliable third-party sources on this issue and we're not likely to ever see any, so as far as I'm concerned, it stays out.
884:
Excellent! The statement at 3O is commendably neutral, and you pointed to my latest version which, I think, meets your point about clear technical violations.
2663:), the following script allows a user to perform the function CopyUser on the clipboard's contents and save it to a variable designated by either the hotkey 1331:
The information about who uses AutoHotkey in what field is not particularly pertinent in terms of an encyclopedia and should probably be removed even if it
865:
I see Peter M. Brown added it back and modified it slightly but it's still about a website, not the product itself. I removed it yet again and have added a
2659:
In this example, once the contents of a Knowledge user name or IP address link have been copied from anywhere on Knowledge's site to the clipboard (using
1056:
I agree with the "by the community, for the community" quote being somewhat promotional language, and thus unnecessary. Sure, whatever is best. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
796:}} box: "This page is not one of Knowledge's policies or guidelines 
 Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints." 423:
This sentence was not English! Anyway, it's good that this article exists in Knowledge because Google is spammed when you search for automation software.
3266: 339: 329: 200: 79: 1698:"Welcome to AHKScript.org, a new community founded by a number of enthusiasts to promote the use of AutoHotkey." A community? A fan site? A forum? Read 3103:
with AutoHotkey. Better examples of the power of AutoHotkey (short and simple script with a powerful and useful effect) would definitely be welcome. --
3261: 1980:'autohotkey.com' as official site, just below '1.1.13.01 / 4 May 2014; 36 days ago' as 'last Stable release' that come only from the other domain. 2396:
So if you change the url back to autohotkey.com, please also revert the “latest release” info to the appropriate release and fix this sentence:
1916:
is 1.0.48.05 so the last version showed in the article square box should be changed, and last modification date should back to 5 year ago, see:
3271: 1296: 997:
Okay, thanks. My 3O thoughts (I had a more detailed version of this written up, and of course I managed to hit cancel, so let's try again...):
3169:, I don't understand what you mean by "avoid references to the 'other' product’s site" when it comes to the examples. Could you elaborate? -- 85: 305: 776:. Unfortunately, the article does not contain a section or subsection called "Directory". Neither I nor Joedf finds "any direct breach". 2458: 2278: 1568: 1355: 742:
If the information were of interest to anyone else in the tech world, they would have written about it, wouldn't they? Yet no one cares.
499:: Development begins on AutoHotkey, spun-off from AutoIt because of the desire for a keyboard/mouse hooking feature being turned down. 44: 2502:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
680:
of what's happened at the company (the reference name admits as much), and we should not publicize that. The section amounts to
3311: 288: 255: 99: 30: 1487: 1134:
explicitly permits statements that lack independent sources and therfore went on to offer other objections. As things stand,
635:
This is a bit of a catch-22 situation... Even the python page uses the official website for its history for individual facts:
3286: 1310: 358: 260: 104: 20: 3133:
example? You have superseded it. Readers should not need to try to cope with the older example before encountering yours.
1511:
Thanks for that information. If the fork becomes as notable as the original we should definitely add that information here.
1014:
Criterion 1 is due weight; I think that four sentences in an article about a tool supported by the foundation is reasonable.
2492: 1848: 1194: 537: 446: 74: 3151:. If the examples are not pared back, I'll do it indiscriminately. Also, avoid references to the "other" product's site. 1887:
Registrant City: LONDON Registrant State/Province: ENGLAND Registrant Postal Code: WC1V 6AX Registrant Country: GB
524: 168: 2567: 1493:
This was my reasoning for changing the current official website to ahkscript.org, but unfortunately my edit was undone.
230: 135: 2142: 1984:
If ahkscript.org will not be a fork, we should explain that when the original author will give the autohotkey.com and
65: 3196: 3156: 2423: 2400:
In 2010, AutoHotKey v1.1 (originally called AutoHotkey_L) became the platform for ongoing development of AutoHotkey.
2356: 2203: 2169: 2082: 2019: 1946: 1864: 1802: 1707: 1591: 1541: 1516: 1202: 1158: 1100: 939: 910: 874: 847: 693: 619: 2007:
In 2010, AutoHotKey v1.1 (originally called AutoHotkey_L) became the platform for ongoing development of AutoHotkey.
2033:
is 1.0.48.05. I would keep the note at bottom of the article, but would remove the note and end of your sentence--
629: 1583: 632: 196: 2523:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2052: 419:
It's true that AutoIt3 is capable of the same things has AHK with GUI, but is more easy to script complex tasks?
368: 3225: 3138: 3077: 2596: 1729: 1143: 1086: 895: 833: 662: 1670: 218: 2282: 2160:
What you're suggesting is conflating the two subjects. Create a new article for AHK_L provided that it meets
1572: 1411: 2558: 2484: 2454: 1359: 793: 129: 109: 1416: 3192: 3166: 3152: 2419: 2367: 2352: 2199: 2165: 2078: 2015: 1942: 1860: 1798: 1703: 1669:
a "fan" site. Currently, plans are in motion to transfer ownership of autohotkey.com to the newly created
1587: 1537: 1512: 1442: 1198: 1190: 1154: 1096: 935: 906: 870: 843: 703: 689: 615: 301: 563:
The administration of the official site has had many changes over its history.. In response to this, the
2542:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2530: 2408: 1373: 1138:
and Criterion 3 cancel each other out, so the basis for deciding should be limited to Criteria 1 and 2.
773: 236: 2483:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1844: 1788: 1689: 1501: 125: 1369: 2641: 2439: 2274: 1836: 1582:
AutoHotkey_L is a fork of the original product. It's not the original product. Are you familiar with
1564: 1478:(Steve Gray, also known as Lexikos). Furthermore, the official download of AutoHotkey now resides at 1351: 607: 434: 549: 189: 3221: 3148: 3134: 3073: 2592: 2404: 1183: 1139: 1082: 891: 829: 769: 760: 677: 658: 603: 161: 55: 1840: 1784: 1685: 1497: 438: 304:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
175: 2445: 1081:
Should one or the other of these policies be revised? Or am I not understanding them correctly?
1047: 974: 783: 688:. In short, no need to discuss the struggles over the website unless a third-party discusses it. 681: 70: 2527:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1431: 2543: 1674:
AutoHotkey. Hence, ahkscript.org should be listed on the Knowledge page as an alternative site.
1536:. It's obviously not an official website of the original product, but it's associated with it. 1426: 545: 511:: The last version of AuotIt source code that's publicly released before it goes closed-source. 3174: 3108: 2649: 2624: 2297: 2232:
As of today July 2016, both web site let download same binary "AutoHotkey112400_Install.exe".
2154: 1438: 1304: 1135: 1131: 1075: 1071: 1008: 671:
You're right, PRIMARY does is for making straightforward, descriptive statements, but this is
654: 599: 496: 442: 51: 508: 3122: 3065: 2330:
Just want to understand why you reverted the url on the AutoHotkey page. As far as I know,
1640: 1606: 869:. In past 3Os, an editor frequently leaves their opinion and no further discussion is made. 721: 711: 685: 672: 462:
I'm no AutoHotkey guru, but shouldn't the last line of the third example script that reads:
2550: 2056: 1895:
Registrant State/Province:Arizona Registrant Postal Code:85260 Registrant Country:US
1488:
http://ahkscript.org/boards/viewtopic.php?f=0&t=127&p=1511&hilit=+nothing#p1511
1455:
Further information about the AutoHotkey community that may shed more light on the subject:
736:
Please elaborate. Which if the four sentences is not both straightforward and descriptive?
3242: 3165:
Well, given that threat I chose to simply remove what I found to be less useful examples.
3092: 2660: 2373: 2335: 2311: 2262: 2222: 2185: 2120: 1061: 988: 954: 925: 644: 588: 476: 1275: 141: 3235:
I believe this is accurate, but I am also unsure where such reference could be found :(
2509:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2493:
https://web.archive.org/web/20111104142142/http://www.autohotkey.com/changelog/2004.htm
2150: 1699: 1533: 1001: 574: 2549:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1529:
And now we have an anonymous editor from Tbilisi, Georgia adding the link three times.
3255: 2247: 2097: 2066: 2038: 1994: 1965: 1931: 1903: 1482:. The download links on both ahkscript.org and autohotkey.com point to this address. 1177: 1040: 1011:, as if it had been considered for its own article and found insufficiently notable: 967: 809: 611: 430:
I would like to see how many times Auto Hot Keys was downloaded. I suspect a bunch.
636: 3170: 3104: 2645: 2620: 2293: 1558:
Where is the evidence that ahkscript.org is legit? the new source seems to be here
866: 2029:
note 14 is not anymore a valid citation as now the last version downloadable from
3121:
avoid, quite adequately, the problem of the obscure (to many folks) reference to
2271:
What happened to both autohotkey.com and ahkscript.org? Neither one is working.
2615: 2611: 2516: 2161: 1636: 1602: 812:", but the entries relate only to technical matters, not to organizational ones. 2496: 502: 348: 280: 249: 3238: 3088: 3061: 2583: 2515:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2476: 2346: 2307: 2258: 2218: 2181: 2146: 2116: 1170:
But let me be clear, there is no conflict at the guideline. It clearly reads:
1057: 984: 950: 921: 750: 640: 584: 24: 2053:
http://www.autohotkey.com/board/topic/92482-what-is-happening-with-this-site/
575:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Encyclopedic_content
1387:
The recent attempts to change AutoHotkey's web address in the info box from
297: 1985: 1917: 2213:
Woah... I think I got confused here. The download link on this article is
1661:
in the context of an encyclopedic article about AutoHotkey. ahkscript.org
1559: 1412:
http://www.autohotkey.com/board/topic/58864-my-status-and-website-changes/
1407:
appear to be down to an ongoing community fork rather than spoofing, see:
1173:
Content about the organization can be added into relevant articles if it:
2243: 2093: 2062: 2034: 1990: 1961: 1927: 1899: 1000:
The foundation does not appear to qualify for independent notability per
730:
The paragraph is not a series of straightforward, descriptive statements.
293: 1417:
http://www.autohotkey.com/board/topic/76331-the-future-of-autohotkeycom/
1130:
A valid point. The conflict is relevant here, though. You agreed that
1007:
If it's not independently notable, let's examine it through the lens of
842:
Nothing to fix. It's not worthy of inclusion. Sorry you don't get that.
2240: 824:
Fine, let's fix them! First, though, the paragraph has to be restored.
2030: 559:
Hi Walter Görlitz, I would like to know why this is not encyclopedic:
2372:
I read it now. It's interesting, thanks for the enlightenment. :-) —
3302:
Start-Class Free and open-source software articles of Low-importance
2699:
utilizes the resultant variables to produce a revert edits summary.
2306:
Server maintenance and changes, both are hosted on the same server.
2236: 1891:
Registrant Postal Code: 47111 Registrant Country: United States
564: 3183:
I haven't reviewed the changes but the issue I was referencing was
2198:
Feel free to remove any material that you think should be removed.
3246: 3229: 3200: 3178: 3160: 3142: 3112: 3096: 3081: 2653: 2628: 2600: 2572: 2462: 2427: 2412: 2376: 2360: 2338: 2315: 2301: 2286: 2266: 2251: 2226: 2207: 2189: 2173: 2138: 2124: 2101: 2086: 2070: 2042: 2023: 1998: 1969: 1950: 1935: 1907: 1868: 1852: 1806: 1792: 1711: 1693: 1644: 1610: 1595: 1576: 1545: 1520: 1505: 1446: 1377: 1363: 1206: 1162: 1147: 1104: 1090: 1065: 1051: 992: 978: 958: 943: 929: 914: 899: 878: 851: 837: 697: 666: 648: 623: 592: 553: 485: 450: 416:
It would be nice to point main differences between both softwares.
1479: 3188: 1467: 1401: 802:
Fans can read the changelog at the site if they're interested.
521: 212: 184: 15: 3184: 2442:, for tips about the use of AutoHotkey by Knowledge editors. 2092:
please remove note 14 reference at the end of your sentence--
1956: 1913: 1658: 1631: 1476:
including the official developer and maintainer of AutoHotkey
1459: 1432:
http://www.auto-hotkey.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=127
1391: 2214: 1427:
http://www.auto-hotkey.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=39
1036:, but it doesn't go into detail about a non-notable topic. 367: 347: 1471: 2487:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
2331: 2233: 2057:
http://ahkscript.org/boards/viewtopic.php?p=15291#p15291
1654: 1627: 2480: 1989:
and web site release often and with a new versioning.--
1923: 1078: 2418:
I care about the dispute so just don't change either.
1665:
an alternative site to autohotkey.com and is anything
1486:
community and that he wants "nothing to do with him "
471:^+r::Send revert edits by ] to last version by %last% 465:^+r::Send revert edits by ] to last version by %last% 160: 3297:
Low-importance Free and open-source software articles
2606:
While I do understand your point, I am thinking that
598:
What's not encyclopedic is that it's sourced only by
3147:
A separate problem is that it's starting to violate
1032:
comfortable sourcing to a primary source since it's
292:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 3282:
Start-Class software articles of Unknown-importance
2644:
and not in the general article about AutoHotkey. --
2519:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1955:yes confused by the Wiki article that still report 3292:Start-Class Free and open-source software articles 577:and there does not seem to be any direct breach. 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 2505:This message was posted before February 2018. 2010:Another port of the program is AutoHotkey.dll. 905:argue with them, but continuing is your call. 3064:": general readers are unlikely to know what 1474:. The majority of the community moved there, 174: 8: 2497:http://www.autohotkey.com/changelog/2004.htm 2113:Ps. reference #14 is not a "valid mention". 1180:of detail and significance for that article; 774:Knowledge: What Knowledge is not § Directory 1657:is not as important, if not more, than the 1095:A question for those talk pages, not here. 606:sources that would be different. In short: 216: 3307:All Free and open-source software articles 2475:I have just modified one external link on 2389:Just a quick note to prevent an edit-war: 2272: 244: 1922:The last version that is downloadable by 199:on 25 February 2013 (UTC). The result of 3130: 3126: 3056:A better example of a function is needed 2696: 2692: 2688: 2684: 2680: 2676: 2672: 2668: 2664: 1986:https://github.com/AutoHotkey/AutoHotkey 1918:https://github.com/AutoHotkey/AutoHotkey 2334:has become a link to AutoHotkey.com. — 1560:https://github.com/Lexikos/AutoHotkey_L 1259:was invoked but never defined (see the 1237:was invoked but never defined (see the 1223: 413:I don't it very deeply, neither AutoIt; 246: 3125:. So why not delete the pre-existing 1653:But yet, it cannot be denied that the 1302: 1189:only includes information that can be 1074:is in conflict with the sentence from 568:"by the community, for the community". 1780:a fan site, neither is ahkscript.org. 7: 3277:Unknown-importance software articles 2241:https://www.autohotkey.com/download/ 2137:That puts it into the same class as 1912:As now the last official version on 286:This article is within the scope of 3060:With reference to the last of the " 2619:user interface interaction, etc. -- 2292:Both of them work, I just tried. -- 2031:http://www.autohotkey.com/download/ 1730:words of the superadmin of the site 1251: 1229: 920:please keep it respectful. Thanks. 818:There were also incorrect uses of . 235:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 1982:As now the article mix up the two. 867:third-party opinion to be provided 14: 3267:Low-importance Computing articles 3187:vs the community fork version at 2479:. Please take a moment to review 1323:general cleanup and History edits 1976:ok I had to reword the sentence: 279: 248: 217: 188: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 2351:Have you read this discussion? 334:This article has been rated as 314:Knowledge:WikiProject Computing 195:This article was nominated for 3262:Start-Class Computing articles 2377:19:19, 22 September 2017 (UTC) 2361:13:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC) 2339:06:06, 22 September 2017 (UTC) 2316:00:52, 20 September 2016 (UTC) 2302:00:48, 20 September 2016 (UTC) 2287:00:38, 20 September 2016 (UTC) 2143:its distributions and variants 1480:http://ahkscript.org/download/ 1276:"The future of AutoHotkey.com" 505:: First release of AutoHotkey. 317:Template:WikiProject Computing 1: 3272:Start-Class software articles 3247:15:56, 2 September 2020 (UTC) 3230:13:47, 2 September 2020 (UTC) 2385:Url / release info in Infobox 1546:15:22, 16 February 2014 (UTC) 1070:It seems that Criterion 3 of 639:Do you have any suggestions? 533:-Valik, Jan 21 2005, 07:42 PM 486:01:47, 19 November 2006 (UTC) 451:14:57, 25 February 2013 (UTC) 379:Free and open-source software 376:This article is supported by 356:This article is supported by 308:and see a list of open tasks. 265:Free and open-source software 42:Put new text under old text. 2463:13:42, 12 January 2017 (UTC) 2195:Only if it meets notability. 2145:. It's in the same class as 1732:, tank aka Charlie Simmons: 1521:05:53, 23 January 2014 (UTC) 1506:04:59, 23 January 2014 (UTC) 573:subject)? I looked at this: 3191:. Sorry that it was vague. 3189:http://www.auto-hotkey.com/ 1468:http://www.auto-hotkey.com/ 1447:18:02, 8 October 2013 (UTC) 1402:http://www.auto-hotkey.com/ 1207:07:00, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 1163:06:54, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 1153:Did you read the 3O above? 1148:22:01, 8 October 2019 (UTC) 1105:19:43, 8 October 2019 (UTC) 1091:19:38, 8 October 2019 (UTC) 1066:14:59, 8 October 2019 (UTC) 1052:14:34, 8 October 2019 (UTC) 993:13:54, 8 October 2019 (UTC) 979:13:47, 8 October 2019 (UTC) 959:19:18, 4 October 2019 (UTC) 944:19:09, 4 October 2019 (UTC) 930:19:06, 4 October 2019 (UTC) 915:18:52, 4 October 2019 (UTC) 900:18:49, 4 October 2019 (UTC) 879:06:01, 4 October 2019 (UTC) 852:23:51, 3 October 2019 (UTC) 838:19:21, 3 October 2019 (UTC) 808:Autohotkey does provide a " 698:05:48, 3 October 2019 (UTC) 667:16:38, 2 October 2019 (UTC) 649:15:15, 2 October 2019 (UTC) 624:14:45, 2 October 2019 (UTC) 593:14:39, 2 October 2019 (UTC) 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 3328: 3185:http://www.autohotkey.com/ 2536:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2472:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2434:AutoHotkey for Wikipedians 1957:http://www.autohotkey.com/ 1914:http://www.autohotkey.com/ 1645:00:54, 28 April 2014 (UTC) 1611:01:05, 28 April 2014 (UTC) 1596:00:24, 28 April 2014 (UTC) 1577:00:09, 28 April 2014 (UTC) 1460:http://www.autohotkey.com/ 1392:http://www.autohotkey.com/ 1378:21:33, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1364:19:55, 14 April 2013 (UTC) 1309:: CS1 maint: url-status ( 554:02:08, 28 March 2008 (UTC) 340:project's importance scale 2573:07:44, 12 July 2017 (UTC) 2428:15:58, 19 July 2014 (UTC) 2413:10:28, 19 July 2014 (UTC) 2267:03:07, 24 July 2016 (UTC) 2252:13:56, 21 July 2016 (UTC) 2227:17:30, 23 June 2014 (UTC) 2215:http://ahkscript/download 2208:16:30, 23 June 2014 (UTC) 2190:15:50, 23 June 2014 (UTC) 2174:06:50, 23 June 2014 (UTC) 2125:05:30, 23 June 2014 (UTC) 2102:00:30, 12 June 2014 (UTC) 2087:15:06, 11 June 2014 (UTC) 2071:08:40, 11 June 2014 (UTC) 2043:08:07, 11 June 2014 (UTC) 2024:03:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC) 1999:23:55, 10 June 2014 (UTC) 1970:22:04, 10 June 2014 (UTC) 1951:14:46, 10 June 2014 (UTC) 1936:11:38, 10 June 2014 (UTC) 1908:11:30, 10 June 2014 (UTC) 1671:AutoHotkey Foundation LLC 1383:AutoHotkey community fork 710:The deleted paragraph is 565:AutoHotkey Foundation LLC 375: 355: 333: 274: 243: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 3201:01:30, 24 May 2018 (UTC) 3179:23:59, 23 May 2018 (UTC) 3161:19:52, 23 May 2018 (UTC) 3143:19:37, 23 May 2018 (UTC) 3113:22:50, 22 May 2018 (UTC) 3097:05:29, 21 May 2018 (UTC) 3082:17:39, 20 May 2018 (UTC) 2701: 2654:12:23, 20 May 2018 (UTC) 2629:00:50, 20 May 2018 (UTC) 2601:00:17, 20 May 2018 (UTC) 1869:00:52, 22 May 2014 (UTC) 1853:21:24, 21 May 2014 (UTC) 1807:06:27, 21 May 2014 (UTC) 1793:06:22, 21 May 2014 (UTC) 1712:17:12, 20 May 2014 (UTC) 1694:16:56, 20 May 2014 (UTC) 1472:http://www.ahkscript.org 782:This section amounts to 706:'s statements in order: 3215:Insufficient citations? 2582:The final bullet under 2468:External links modified 3312:All Computing articles 3053: 2048:after read everything: 1470:, then permanently at 372: 352: 302:information technology 225:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 3287:All Software articles 2657: 2332:http://ahkscript.org/ 2234:http://ahkscript.org/ 1184:avoids self-promotion 720:The lead sentence of 371: 351: 289:WikiProject Computing 100:Neutral point of view 2642:Knowledge:AutoHotkey 2517:regular verification 2440:Knowledge:AutoHotkey 1924:http://ahkscript.org 1255:The named reference 1233:The named reference 602:sources. If you had 359:WikiProject Software 105:No original research 2578:Quick code testing? 2507:After February 2018 1278:. Chris. 2012-01-26 1235:2003to2004changelog 1195:independent sources 2610:what was meant is 2561:InternetArchiveBot 2512:InternetArchiveBot 373: 353: 320:Computing articles 231:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 2537: 2289: 2277:comment added by 2257:foundation page. 2155:Apache OpenOffice 2061:'ahkscript.org'-- 1856: 1839:comment added by 1567:comment added by 1354:comment added by 1297:"WG edit-history" 1178:appropriate level 1044: 1034:about the product 971: 792:Quote from the {{ 542: 541: 534: 454: 437:comment added by 398: 397: 394: 393: 390: 389: 211: 210: 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 3319: 3050: 3047: 3044: 3041: 3038: 3035: 3032: 3029: 3026: 3023: 3020: 3017: 3014: 3011: 3008: 3005: 3002: 2999: 2996: 2993: 2990: 2987: 2984: 2981: 2978: 2975: 2972: 2969: 2966: 2963: 2960: 2957: 2954: 2951: 2948: 2945: 2942: 2939: 2936: 2933: 2930: 2927: 2924: 2921: 2918: 2915: 2912: 2909: 2906: 2903: 2900: 2897: 2894: 2891: 2888: 2885: 2882: 2879: 2876: 2873: 2870: 2867: 2864: 2861: 2858: 2855: 2852: 2849: 2846: 2843: 2840: 2837: 2834: 2831: 2828: 2825: 2822: 2819: 2816: 2813: 2810: 2807: 2804: 2801: 2798: 2795: 2792: 2789: 2786: 2783: 2780: 2777: 2774: 2771: 2768: 2765: 2762: 2759: 2756: 2753: 2750: 2747: 2744: 2741: 2738: 2735: 2732: 2729: 2726: 2723: 2720: 2717: 2714: 2711: 2708: 2705: 2571: 2562: 2535: 2534: 2513: 2461: 2452: 2448: 2371: 2350: 2239:point to domain 1855: 1833: 1579: 1366: 1315: 1314: 1308: 1300: 1293: 1287: 1286: 1284: 1283: 1272: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1258: 1250: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1236: 1228: 1048:talk to the boss 1038: 975:talk to the boss 965: 532: 522: 484: 482: 481: 458:Error in script? 453: 431: 322: 321: 318: 315: 312: 283: 276: 275: 270: 267: 252: 245: 228: 222: 221: 213: 192: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 3327: 3326: 3322: 3321: 3320: 3318: 3317: 3316: 3252: 3251: 3217: 3132: 3128: 3058: 3052: 3051: 3048: 3045: 3042: 3039: 3036: 3033: 3030: 3027: 3024: 3021: 3018: 3015: 3012: 3009: 3006: 3003: 3000: 2997: 2994: 2991: 2988: 2985: 2982: 2979: 2976: 2973: 2970: 2967: 2964: 2961: 2958: 2955: 2952: 2949: 2946: 2943: 2940: 2937: 2934: 2931: 2928: 2925: 2922: 2919: 2916: 2913: 2910: 2907: 2904: 2901: 2898: 2895: 2892: 2889: 2886: 2883: 2880: 2877: 2874: 2871: 2868: 2865: 2862: 2859: 2856: 2853: 2850: 2847: 2844: 2841: 2838: 2835: 2832: 2829: 2826: 2823: 2820: 2817: 2814: 2811: 2808: 2805: 2802: 2799: 2796: 2793: 2790: 2787: 2784: 2781: 2778: 2775: 2772: 2769: 2766: 2763: 2760: 2757: 2754: 2751: 2748: 2745: 2742: 2739: 2736: 2733: 2730: 2727: 2724: 2721: 2718: 2715: 2712: 2709: 2706: 2703: 2698: 2694: 2690: 2686: 2682: 2678: 2674: 2670: 2666: 2637: 2635:Removed example 2580: 2565: 2560: 2528: 2521:have permission 2511: 2485:this simple FaQ 2470: 2450: 2444: 2443: 2436: 2387: 2365: 2344: 2328: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1834: 1562: 1457: 1385: 1349: 1346: 1344:user experience 1325: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1301: 1295: 1294: 1290: 1281: 1279: 1274: 1273: 1269: 1256: 1254: 1252: 1247: 1234: 1232: 1230: 1225: 1045: 1022:this criterion. 972: 493: 479: 477: 475: 472: 466: 460: 432: 403: 319: 316: 313: 310: 309: 268: 258: 229:on Knowledge's 226: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 3325: 3323: 3315: 3314: 3309: 3304: 3299: 3294: 3289: 3284: 3279: 3274: 3269: 3264: 3254: 3253: 3250: 3249: 3236: 3222:Mike Marchmont 3216: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3204: 3203: 3193:Walter Görlitz 3153:Walter Görlitz 3057: 3054: 3010:; Ctrl+Shift+R 2749:; Ctrl+Shift+E 2725:; Ctrl+Shift+W 2702: 2675:or the hotkey 2636: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2579: 2576: 2555: 2554: 2547: 2500: 2499: 2491:Added archive 2469: 2466: 2435: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2420:Walter Görlitz 2386: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2368:Walter Görlitz 2353:Walter Görlitz 2327: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2304: 2269: 2211: 2210: 2200:Walter Görlitz 2196: 2177: 2176: 2166:Walter Görlitz 2158: 2151:OpenOffice.org 2135: 2132: 2090: 2089: 2079:Walter Görlitz 2059: 2055: 2050: 2049: 2027: 2026: 2016:Walter Görlitz 2013: 2012: 2011: 2008: 1983: 1981: 1978: 1977: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1943:Walter Görlitz 1893: 1889: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1861:Walter Görlitz 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1799:Walter Görlitz 1781: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1704:Walter Görlitz 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1648: 1647: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1588:Walter Görlitz 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1538:Walter Görlitz 1530: 1524: 1523: 1513:Walter Görlitz 1456: 1453: 1451: 1435: 1434: 1429: 1424: 1419: 1414: 1405: 1404: 1395: 1394: 1384: 1381: 1345: 1342: 1324: 1321: 1317: 1316: 1288: 1267: 1245: 1222: 1221: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1199:Walter Görlitz 1187: 1181: 1168: 1155:Walter Görlitz 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1097:Walter Görlitz 1079:that I quoted. 1037: 1029: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1005: 983:I believe so. 964: 936:Walter Görlitz 907:Walter Görlitz 889: 885: 871:Walter Görlitz 863: 862: 861: 860: 859: 858: 857: 856: 855: 854: 844:Walter Görlitz 827: 826: 825: 821: 820: 814: 813: 805: 804: 798: 797: 794:Deletion essay 789: 788: 778: 777: 766: 765: 755: 754: 745: 744: 738: 737: 733: 732: 726: 725: 717: 716: 704:Walter Görlitz 690:Walter Görlitz 637:Python History 626: 616:Walter Görlitz 583:Kind regards, 582: 570: 569: 558: 540: 539: 536: 526: 519: 513: 512: 506: 500: 492: 489: 470: 464: 459: 456: 421: 420: 417: 414: 409: 402: 399: 396: 395: 392: 391: 388: 387: 384:Low-importance 374: 364: 363: 354: 344: 343: 336:Low-importance 332: 326: 325: 323: 306:the discussion 284: 272: 271: 269:Low‑importance 253: 241: 240: 234: 223: 209: 208: 201:the discussion 193: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3324: 3313: 3310: 3308: 3305: 3303: 3300: 3298: 3295: 3293: 3290: 3288: 3285: 3283: 3280: 3278: 3275: 3273: 3270: 3268: 3265: 3263: 3260: 3259: 3257: 3248: 3244: 3240: 3237: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3231: 3227: 3223: 3214: 3202: 3198: 3194: 3190: 3186: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3176: 3172: 3168: 3164: 3163: 3162: 3158: 3154: 3150: 3146: 3145: 3144: 3140: 3136: 3124: 3120: 3117:Your example 3116: 3115: 3114: 3110: 3106: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3094: 3090: 3084: 3083: 3079: 3075: 3070: 3067: 3063: 3055: 2965:StringReplace 2935:StringReplace 2911:StringReplace 2899:Contributions 2875:StringReplace 2833:StringReplace 2809:StringReplace 2767:StringReplace 2700: 2687:. The hotkey 2662: 2656: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2643: 2634: 2630: 2626: 2622: 2617: 2613: 2609: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2598: 2594: 2590: 2585: 2577: 2575: 2574: 2569: 2564: 2563: 2552: 2548: 2545: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2532: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2508: 2503: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2486: 2482: 2478: 2473: 2467: 2465: 2464: 2460: 2456: 2451:Pigsonthewing 2447: 2441: 2438:I've started 2433: 2429: 2425: 2421: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2410: 2406: 2401: 2397: 2394: 2390: 2384: 2378: 2375: 2369: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2358: 2354: 2348: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2337: 2333: 2325: 2317: 2313: 2309: 2305: 2303: 2299: 2295: 2291: 2290: 2288: 2284: 2280: 2279:118.232.38.47 2276: 2270: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2249: 2245: 2242: 2238: 2237:download link 2235: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2224: 2220: 2216: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2156: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2133: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2122: 2118: 2114: 2111: 2107: 2104: 2103: 2099: 2095: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2068: 2064: 2058: 2054: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2040: 2036: 2032: 2025: 2021: 2017: 2014: 2009: 2006: 2005: 2003: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1996: 1992: 1987: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1958: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1920: 1919: 1915: 1910: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1857: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1779: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1734: 1733: 1731: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1672: 1668: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1633: 1632:original site 1629: 1624: 1623: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1580: 1578: 1574: 1570: 1569:154.5.165.117 1566: 1561: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1494: 1491: 1489: 1483: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1464: 1461: 1454: 1452: 1449: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1433: 1430: 1428: 1425: 1423: 1420: 1418: 1415: 1413: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1403: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1393: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1382: 1380: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1356:93.99.163.104 1353: 1343: 1341: 1337: 1334: 1329: 1322: 1312: 1306: 1298: 1292: 1289: 1277: 1271: 1268: 1262: 1249: 1246: 1240: 1227: 1224: 1220: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1185: 1182: 1179: 1175: 1174: 1172: 1171: 1169: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1049: 1042: 1035: 1030: 1028: 1020: 1016: 1013: 1012: 1010: 1006: 1003: 999: 998: 996: 995: 994: 990: 986: 982: 981: 980: 976: 969: 962: 961: 960: 956: 952: 947: 946: 945: 941: 937: 933: 932: 931: 927: 923: 918: 917: 916: 912: 908: 903: 902: 901: 897: 893: 890: 886: 883: 882: 881: 880: 876: 872: 868: 853: 849: 845: 841: 840: 839: 835: 831: 828: 823: 822: 819: 816: 815: 811: 807: 806: 803: 800: 799: 795: 791: 790: 787: 785: 780: 779: 775: 772:redirects to 771: 768: 767: 764: 762: 757: 756: 752: 747: 746: 743: 740: 739: 735: 734: 731: 728: 727: 723: 719: 718: 714: 713: 708: 707: 705: 701: 700: 699: 695: 691: 687: 683: 679: 674: 670: 669: 668: 664: 660: 656: 653:According to 652: 651: 650: 646: 642: 638: 634: 631: 627: 625: 621: 617: 613: 609: 608:WP:NOTFANSITE 605: 601: 597: 596: 595: 594: 590: 586: 578: 576: 566: 562: 561: 560: 556: 555: 551: 547: 535: 527: 523: 520: 517: 510: 509:February 2005 507: 504: 503:November 2003 501: 498: 495: 494: 490: 488: 487: 483: 469: 463: 457: 455: 452: 448: 444: 440: 436: 428: 424: 418: 415: 412: 411: 410: 407: 400: 385: 382:(assessed as 381: 380: 370: 366: 365: 361: 360: 350: 346: 345: 341: 337: 331: 328: 327: 324: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 290: 285: 282: 278: 277: 273: 266: 262: 257: 254: 251: 247: 242: 238: 232: 224: 220: 215: 214: 206: 202: 198: 194: 191: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 3218: 3149:WP:NOTMANUAL 3123:URI‑encoding 3118: 3085: 3071: 3066:URI-encoding 3059: 2658: 2638: 2607: 2588: 2581: 2559: 2556: 2531:source check 2510: 2504: 2501: 2474: 2471: 2459:Andy's edits 2455:Talk to Andy 2446:Andy Mabbett 2437: 2402: 2398: 2395: 2391: 2388: 2329: 2273:— Preceding 2212: 2178: 2115: 2112: 2108: 2105: 2091: 2051: 2028: 1979: 1921: 1911: 1897: 1835:— Preceding 1777: 1666: 1662: 1584:Ubuntu Linux 1563:— Preceding 1495: 1492: 1484: 1475: 1465: 1458: 1450: 1439:Matthiaspaul 1436: 1406: 1396: 1386: 1368: 1350:— Preceding 1347: 1338: 1332: 1330: 1326: 1291: 1280:. Retrieved 1270: 1253:Cite error: 1248: 1231:Cite error: 1226: 1218: 1129: 1033: 888:improvement. 864: 817: 801: 781: 770:WP:CHANGELOG 761:WP:CHANGELOG 758: 741: 729: 709: 678:WP:CHANGELOG 604:WP:SECONDARY 579: 571: 557: 543: 530: 518: 514: 473: 467: 461: 433:— Preceding 429: 425: 422: 408: 404: 377: 357: 335: 287: 237:WikiProjects 204: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 3135:Peter Brown 3074:Peter Brown 2616:Prototyping 2612:prototyping 2593:Peter Brown 2141:and all of 1370:SouthStExit 1140:Peter Brown 1083:Peter Brown 892:Peter Brown 830:Peter Brown 784:WP:FANCRUFT 682:WP:FANCRUFT 659:Peter Brown 474:instead? -- 227:Start-class 148:free images 31:not a forum 3256:Categories 2568:Report bug 2477:AutoHotkey 2374:Ineuw talk 2336:Ineuw talk 2147:StarOffice 1630:, but the 1282:2012-02-01 1257:ourhistory 1219:References 1136:WP:PRIMARY 1132:WP:PRIMARY 1076:WP:PRIMARY 1072:WP:FAILORG 1009:WP:FAILORG 702:Taking up 655:WP:PRIMARY 600:WP:PRIMARY 516:they are. 497:April 2003 25:AutoHotkey 3004:Clipboard 2989:%A_Space% 2977:Clipboard 2971:Clipboard 2947:Clipboard 2941:Clipboard 2923:Clipboard 2917:Clipboard 2887:Clipboard 2881:Clipboard 2845:Clipboard 2839:Clipboard 2821:Clipboard 2815:Clipboard 2797:wikipedia 2779:Clipboard 2773:Clipboard 2761:Clipboard 2551:this tool 2544:this tool 1261:help page 1239:help page 1043:franchise 1018:standard. 970:franchise 810:ChangeLog 722:WP:TRIVIA 712:WP:Trivia 686:WP:NOTUSA 673:WP:TRIVIA 401:Questions 311:Computing 298:computing 294:computers 256:Computing 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 3062:Examples 2752:CopyUser 2743:CopyUser 2719:CopyUser 2584:Features 2557:Cheers.— 2405:Chronial 2275:unsigned 1849:contribs 1837:unsigned 1659:old site 1655:new site 1628:new site 1565:unsigned 1352:unsigned 1305:cite web 1193:through 1191:verified 1176:has the 1041:creffett 968:creffett 447:contribs 435:unsigned 261:Software 197:deletion 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 3171:Jhertel 3105:Jhertel 3043:version 2893:Special 2693:⇧ Shift 2681:⇧ Shift 2669:⇧ Shift 2661:Firefox 2646:Jhertel 2621:Jhertel 2481:my edit 2294:Jhertel 1841:Books95 1785:Books95 1700:WP:ELNO 1686:Books95 1534:WP:ELNO 1498:Books95 1002:WP:NORG 759:It's a 491:History 478:docking 439:Cellurl 338:on the 154:WP refs 142:scholar 3167:Walter 3049:%last% 3025:revert 2998:Return 2956:action 2905:target 2004:Done: 1637:Cowb0y 1603:Cowb0y 614:here. 612:WP:POV 468:read: 300:, and 233:scale. 126:Google 3239:Joedf 3089:Joedf 3028:edits 2953:& 2902:& 2869:title 2857:index 2608:maybe 2589:twice 2399:: --> 2347:Ineuw 2326:Again 2308:Joedf 2259:Joedf 2219:Joedf 2182:Joedf 2139:Linux 2117:Joedf 1186:; and 1058:Joedf 985:Joedf 951:Joedf 922:Joedf 751:Joedf 641:Joedf 633:Link2 630:Link1 585:Joedf 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 3243:talk 3226:talk 3197:talk 3175:talk 3157:talk 3139:talk 3127:Ctrl 3119:does 3109:talk 3093:talk 3078:talk 3040:last 3022:Send 2962:edit 2929:User 2827:wiki 2785:http 2737:edit 2713:last 2689:Ctrl 2677:Ctrl 2665:Ctrl 2650:talk 2625:talk 2597:talk 2424:talk 2409:talk 2357:talk 2312:talk 2298:talk 2283:talk 2263:talk 2248:talk 2223:talk 2204:talk 2186:talk 2170:talk 2162:WP:N 2153:and 2121:talk 2098:talk 2083:talk 2067:talk 2039:talk 2020:talk 1995:talk 1966:talk 1947:talk 1932:talk 1904:talk 1865:talk 1845:talk 1803:talk 1789:talk 1708:talk 1690:talk 1641:talk 1607:talk 1592:talk 1573:talk 1542:talk 1517:talk 1502:talk 1443:talk 1374:talk 1360:talk 1311:link 1203:talk 1159:talk 1144:talk 1101:talk 1087:talk 1062:talk 989:talk 955:talk 940:talk 926:talk 911:talk 896:talk 875:talk 848:talk 834:talk 694:talk 663:talk 645:talk 620:talk 589:talk 550:talk 546:HaMc 443:talk 205:keep 203:was 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 2995:All 2863:php 2803:org 2788::// 2525:RfC 2495:to 2453:); 2244:Efa 2094:Efa 2063:Efa 2035:Efa 1991:Efa 1962:Efa 1928:Efa 1900:Efa 1778:not 1667:but 1397:to 1333:can 480:man 330:Low 176:TWL 3258:: 3245:) 3228:) 3199:) 3177:) 3159:) 3141:) 3111:) 3095:) 3080:) 3046:by 3037:to 3031:by 3019::: 3013:^+ 2791:en 2755:() 2746:() 2740::= 2734::: 2728:^+ 2722:() 2716::= 2710::: 2704:^+ 2652:) 2627:) 2599:) 2538:. 2533:}} 2529:{{ 2457:; 2426:) 2411:) 2403:-- 2359:) 2314:) 2300:) 2285:) 2265:) 2250:) 2225:) 2206:) 2188:) 2172:) 2164:. 2149:, 2123:) 2106:— 2100:) 2085:) 2069:) 2041:) 2022:) 1997:) 1968:) 1960:-- 1949:) 1934:) 1906:) 1867:) 1851:) 1847:‱ 1805:) 1791:) 1783:-- 1710:) 1702:. 1692:) 1663:is 1643:) 1609:) 1594:) 1575:) 1544:) 1519:) 1504:) 1490:. 1445:) 1437:-- 1376:) 1362:) 1307:}} 1303:{{ 1263:). 1241:). 1205:) 1197:. 1161:) 1146:) 1103:) 1089:) 1064:) 1050:) 1039:a 991:) 977:) 966:a 957:) 942:) 928:) 913:) 898:) 877:) 850:) 836:) 696:) 665:) 647:) 622:) 591:) 552:) 544:-- 538:” 525:“ 449:) 445:‱ 386:). 296:, 263:/ 259:: 156:) 54:; 3241:( 3224:( 3195:( 3173:( 3155:( 3137:( 3131:X 3129:+ 3107:( 3091:( 3076:( 3034:] 3016:r 3007:} 3001:, 2992:, 2986:, 2983:_ 2980:, 2974:, 2968:, 2959:= 2950:, 2944:, 2938:, 2932:: 2926:, 2920:, 2914:, 2908:= 2896:: 2890:, 2884:, 2878:, 2872:= 2866:? 2860:. 2854:/ 2851:w 2848:, 2842:, 2836:, 2830:/ 2824:, 2818:, 2812:, 2806:/ 2800:. 2794:. 2782:, 2776:, 2770:, 2764:= 2758:{ 2731:e 2707:w 2697:R 2695:+ 2691:+ 2685:E 2683:+ 2679:+ 2673:W 2671:+ 2667:+ 2648:( 2623:( 2595:( 2570:) 2566:( 2553:. 2546:. 2449:( 2422:( 2407:( 2370:: 2366:@ 2355:( 2349:: 2345:@ 2310:( 2296:( 2281:( 2261:( 2246:( 2221:( 2202:( 2184:( 2168:( 2119:( 2096:( 2081:( 2065:( 2037:( 2018:( 1993:( 1964:( 1945:( 1930:( 1902:( 1863:( 1843:( 1801:( 1787:( 1706:( 1688:( 1639:( 1605:( 1590:( 1571:( 1540:( 1515:( 1500:( 1496:— 1441:( 1372:( 1358:( 1313:) 1299:. 1285:. 1201:( 1157:( 1142:( 1099:( 1085:( 1060:( 1046:( 987:( 973:( 953:( 938:( 924:( 909:( 894:( 873:( 846:( 832:( 786:. 763:. 715:. 692:( 661:( 643:( 618:( 587:( 548:( 441:( 362:. 342:. 239:: 207:. 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
AutoHotkey
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Articles for deletion
deletion
the discussion

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑