309:
249:
222:
191:
362:
341:
153:
416:
482:
instead of 0. The "edit summary" field was insufficient for explaining my justification for doing so and several previous edits changed NULL to 0 with the following vague and nebulous justifications:
593:
147:
79:
536:
indicates to a human reader that the variable is a pointer without needing to reference the declaration). This is driven home by the fact that C++11 defines
299:
603:
598:
323:
450:
449:
The last paragraph is too hairy, I don't want too touch it, but it should explain that using the wrong delete is a security vulnerability, linking to:
588:
583:
289:
623:
406:
85:
44:
633:
265:
382:
30:
618:
318:
232:
99:
561:
459:
256:
227:
104:
20:
369:
346:
74:
608:
202:
613:
168:
65:
135:
451:
http://replay.web.archive.org/20080703153358/http://taossa.com/index.php/2007/01/03/attacking-delete-and-delete-in-c
109:
129:
381:
topics on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
374:
208:
628:
190:
463:
455:
125:
532:
instead of 0 produces more self-documenting code (i.e., when manipulating a pointer value, setting it to
55:
565:
264:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
70:
557:
175:
487:"int *p_var = NULL" is still valid C++ syntax, but is very C-style, making it equal zero is more C++
161:
51:
141:
24:
577:
548:). Also, if you're using the GCC C++ compiler (I don't know about other compilers)
308:
556:
which means the compiler will always understand the rvalue to be a pointer value (
248:
221:
521:
569:
467:
524:). However, this rational is purely a matter of personal preference and
478:
I recently made an edit to initialize pointers in the code snippets with
261:
361:
340:
520:
is, as Bjarne
Stroustrup explains, to avoid macros whenever possible (
492:
Changed NULL to 0, although null is same as 0, it should be avoided.
558:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/bk01pt02ch04s03.html
427:
378:
184:
15:
307:
160:
540:(of course, if you're writing to the C++11 standard,
516:should be avoided. The only reason to avoid using
373:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
260:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
174:
594:Redirect-Class software articles of Low-importance
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
500:is no less "C++ style" (whatever that is) than
201:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
496:Frankly, neither of these are good reasons.
8:
522:http://www.stroustrup.com/bs_faq2.html#null
335:
216:
445:using the wrong delete is a vulnerability
512:. And there is no indication as to why
426:This article falls within the scope of
337:
218:
367:This redirect is within the scope of
254:This redirect is within the scope of
188:
7:
528:is part of the C++ standard. Using
274:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Software
207:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
14:
604:Low-importance Computing articles
599:Redirect-Class Computing articles
391:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject C/C++
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
589:Low-importance software articles
584:Redirect-Class software articles
411:This redirect has been rated as
360:
339:
294:This redirect has been rated as
247:
220:
189:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
316:This redirect is supported by
1:
624:Mid-importance C/C++ articles
385:and see a list of open tasks.
277:Template:WikiProject Software
268:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
570:03:45, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
544:would be much preferred to
650:
634:WikiProject C/C++ articles
394:Template:WikiProject C/C++
300:project's importance scale
425:
410:
355:
315:
293:
242:
215:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
468:18:00, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
619:NA-Class C/C++ articles
609:All Computing articles
494:
489:
312:
75:avoid personal attacks
614:All Software articles
490:
485:
319:WikiProject Computing
311:
100:Neutral point of view
257:WikiProject Software
105:No original research
554:#define NULL __null
313:
203:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
458:comment added by
442:
441:
438:
437:
434:
433:
370:WikiProject C/C++
334:
333:
330:
329:
280:software articles
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
641:
555:
551:
547:
543:
539:
535:
531:
527:
519:
515:
511:
507:
503:
499:
481:
470:
417:importance scale
399:
398:
395:
392:
389:
364:
357:
356:
351:
343:
336:
282:
281:
278:
275:
272:
251:
244:
243:
238:
235:
224:
217:
194:
193:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
649:
648:
644:
643:
642:
640:
639:
638:
574:
573:
553:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
517:
513:
509:
505:
501:
497:
479:
476:
453:
447:
396:
393:
390:
387:
386:
349:
279:
276:
273:
270:
269:
236:
230:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
647:
645:
637:
636:
631:
626:
621:
616:
611:
606:
601:
596:
591:
586:
576:
575:
475:
472:
446:
443:
440:
439:
436:
435:
432:
431:
424:
421:
420:
413:Mid-importance
409:
403:
402:
400:
397:C/C++ articles
383:the discussion
365:
353:
352:
350:Mid‑importance
344:
332:
331:
328:
327:
324:Low-importance
314:
304:
303:
296:Low-importance
292:
286:
285:
283:
266:the discussion
252:
240:
239:
237:Low‑importance
225:
213:
212:
206:
195:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
646:
635:
632:
630:
627:
625:
622:
620:
617:
615:
612:
610:
607:
605:
602:
600:
597:
595:
592:
590:
587:
585:
582:
581:
579:
572:
571:
567:
563:
559:
523:
508:operator, or
493:
488:
484:
473:
471:
469:
465:
461:
457:
452:
444:
429:
423:
422:
418:
414:
408:
405:
404:
401:
384:
380:
376:
372:
371:
366:
363:
359:
358:
354:
348:
345:
342:
338:
325:
322:(assessed as
321:
320:
310:
306:
305:
301:
297:
291:
288:
287:
284:
267:
263:
259:
258:
253:
250:
246:
245:
241:
234:
229:
226:
223:
219:
214:
210:
204:
200:
196:
192:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
629:C++ articles
495:
491:
486:
477:
448:
412:
368:
317:
295:
255:
209:WikiProjects
198:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
25:Delete (C++)
19:This is the
562:71.65.94.23
460:99.224.97.6
454:—Preceding
148:free images
31:not a forum
578:Categories
474:NULL vs. 0
233:Computing
88:if needed
71:Be polite
27:redirect.
21:talk page
456:unsigned
271:Software
262:software
228:Software
199:redirect
56:get help
29:This is
542:nullptr
538:nullptr
415:on the
298:on the
154:WP refs
142:scholar
504:, the
205:scale.
126:Google
388:C/C++
347:C/C++
197:This
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
566:talk
560:).
550:NULL
546:NULL
534:NULL
530:NULL
526:NULL
518:NULL
514:NULL
498:NULL
480:NULL
464:talk
377:and
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
552:is
510:for
502:int
428:C++
407:Mid
379:C++
290:Low
176:TWL
580::
568:)
506:++
466:)
326:).
231::
156:)
54:;
564:(
462:(
430:.
419:.
375:C
302:.
211::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
