Knowledge

Talk:Divorce in Islam

Source šŸ“

555:
Sunni Islam has on the matter of divorce. Divorce has almost no conditions in Sunni fiqh. In Shi'ite fiqh (which accords with the Qur'an), divorce requires two witnesses. Furthermore, one is not allowed to divorce one's wife if he has had sexual relations with her since her last menstrual cycle. Rather, he must not have any sexual relationships from the end of menstrual cycle to the end of another (about one month), and then he may recite the Talaq. This, however, is not a condition according to Sunnis. As such, a man may divorce his wife at the drop of a hat.
1578:
jurisprudence and modern national legislation, I wasn't sure what some of the sources referred to, and some referred to specific national codes. If you find that something important is missing and you can access the sources to verify what they're talking about, please restore the content. I also rolled back some Quranic quotations (the sources don't quote these passages and they can be quoted in footnotes if needed) and merged the discussion of iddah and nihah halala into the main body of text, since the concepts have their own articles.
913:
of divorce in secular US courts, they're both still divorce, and if "successful", both end up with the parties being un-married. The topic of this article is essentially a subtopic under the broader topic of divorce; therefore, it shouldn't get parenthetical disambiguation. My only reason for filing an RM instead of being bold is that I'm not sure which of these two titles is preferable. Please indicate which title you support, and if you think either one is better than the current, please mention that as well.
348: 327: 1916:. There is already significant overlap, such as in the Qur'an and Hadith references and general principles and considerations. The academic literature meanwhile does not tend to focus on Khul' as a subject in its own right, but normally covers it within the wider context of divorce/family law and jurisprudence. Khul' would be better off as a redirect to a condensed, well-sourced section in this article on divorce in Islam. 358: 191: 253: 243: 222: 2063: 597:
There is also khul': mutual divorce. This is seen as being initiated by the woman, but it must be accepted by the man. There are financial issues that are important in each type. Divorce may be granted by a judge under certain, relatively rare circumstances: desertion or abuse (the latter especially in Maliki law-- North Africa).
1459:, these banners are an invitation for other editors to help improve the article. It's normal to have them on for months or years, until someone has the desire and time to do so. Personally, I hope I'll be able find the time to improve the sourcing and content sooner than that. We can remove the banner 912:
are unrelated peaks that just happen to share a name. You'd never cover both of them in the same article unless you were writing about mountains in general. Divorce is a very different situation: while the process and implications of divorce in Islam are different from the process and implications
683:
The interpretation is completely wrong. Triple Talaq is a practice or a tradition not recognized by the Sunni Scholars (that is wahy it is named a tradition). In traditional Talaq procedure, one vocal Talaq is sufficient to proceed. To fulfill the Triple Talaq you have to perform divorce three times
596:
This article contains distortions and lacks important information. For one, Talaq is not synonomous with Divorce in Islam. Talaq is a type of divorce in Islam (with sub-types), and there are other types. It comes from the Arabic root tallaqa, meaning to set free. No, women cannot initiate this.
554:
It remains to be seen exactly what Dr. Salamah is upset about. Even though many Sunni 'ulama (though certainly not all) may believe that Mut'ah is abrogated, nonetheless a Sunni man may do exactly the same thing as Mut'ah even if he does not call it that by name. This is because of the leniency that
1251:
Article contain Idaho rule on which a whole article is given. It tellsnikah Muhallil on which a whole article is written. It tells Eelaa which is cited to secondary source. Kindly rather than making a tag of primary article. Please rather than making tag simply remove primary sources which are not
562:
In this case, we see that a man may marry a woman in a permanent marriage (Nikah), with every intention of divorcing her after he has sex with her. He may marry her, then have sexual relations with her, and immediately announce that she is divorced. This is haram according to Shi'a fiqh, yet it is
1235:
violations, and is missing the bulk of material discussed in academic sources: differences between madhhabs, relationship between historical theory and practice, modern transformations of the divorce law itself, and attempts to reform divorce norms through changes in judicial procedure. I've been
1676:
The article currently covers modern reforms only in very general terms. There are dozens of Muslim-majority countries with sharia-based family law, and they all have their own more or less distinct histories of modern sharia-based legislation on divorce, so the topic is quite large and complex.
1841:
The section you're trying to add a main link for is "Quranic principles", so a main article on the topics would be a general article about Quranic principles of divorce. As you can see from the text of the section, it cites several surahs, and in fact SÅ«rat aį¹­-Talāq is not among the explicit
1577:
I'm replacing the description of classical jurisprudence with a summary of two entries of The Oxford Encyclopedia of Islam and Women. Some of the replaced content was based directly on primary sources. Some cited secondary sources, but since the article didn't differentiate between classical
840:
Thanks for your work on this. I've attempted to reorganize some of the content so that the material specifically related to talaq is under that section, and isn't confused with khula. It looks like some of the material under the Aftermath section may apply to both, so perhaps that should be
440:) a thousand times more useful than this. I'm not going to edit this because I am not an expert (I came here to learn) but I think someone knowledgeable should look into it especially the two types of woman0initiated divorce in particular the version where she keeps the dowry, 608:
One of the references has the url of the link instead of a little number. Looking at the wiki markup, it has "ref" and "/ref" exactly like the next reference, which has the little number. Down at the References section the first says "Cite error 8; No text given."
707:
started out as a disambiguation page, and has since developed into a short article that, as has been commented on the talk page, is not nearly as good as this one. I found the second paragraph to be practically incomprehensible. I really don't understand why
1677:
Ideally, we'd like to cover it in some detail. As it is, only a very broad typology of reform and the recent Indian controversy made it into the article, since it has been featured prominently in Indian news. It already has coverage way out of
1363:
There are a couple of Quran and hadith citations without non-primary support and a couple of unsourced sections. We could replace the primary sources banner with a more general refimprove banner ("needs additional citations for verification").
1288:
Removing material without non-primary sourcing is fine, as is adding non-primary citations, but all WP articles should stand on their own. Please don't remove maintenance banners until there's a consensus that the issue has been resolved (see
1492:
Let's not use website citations, since these are generally not RSs for generalizations and need to be contextualized within the spectrum of Muslim opinions. For example, the book on al-islam.org is by US-based modernist authors, while
659:): "Separating concepts in Islam from concepts specific to Arab culture, or from the language itself, can be difficult. Many Arabic concepts have an Arabic secular meaning as well as an Islamic meaning. One example is the concept of 766:
The article mentions that Islamic women may be granted divorce under certain conditions, but it doesn't explain what those conditions might be or how they vary among different schools or regions. Could someone elaborate on this?
1557:
I've introduced a tentative separation between traditional jurisprudence and modern developments, which are to be expanded. It may not be entirely clean, as it looks like some of the refs may be describing modern laws.
684:(in other words marry three times and divorce three times); automatically one can not marry for the fourth time (only after an intermediate marriage). see Triple Talaq for more (I am going to verify that article too). 1842:
citations. I don't know if the title of the surah makes you think that it's the principal source of Quranic principles for divorce, but it's not, and the article on it is not the main article on the subject. Thanks.
153: 1797:
As Pepperbeast indicated in the edit summary, the addition was redundant. We already have a section on traditional legal theory and pre-modern practice of Talaq al-bid'ah and triple talaq in this article, which
1625:
However, a lot of links to "triple talaq" lead to this article which is why I added that sentence (explaining what triple talaq is). Please put it back in a way you deem fit. I don't have time for an edit war!
1236:
planning to improve this article for a while and reading some academic treatments, but I can also share some entries from Oxford encyclopedias through email if someone else is interested in working on it.
1996:
That was part of my concern. I'd rather than editorial decision regarding refining the text be made first through editing, rather than using merging as a surrogate for a hard prune. I have looked at the
2001:
article and each section is referenced, and there are a number of references to what seem to be reliable sources, rather than just one source. Can I therefore suggest that we leave this in the current
1978:
This episode has somewhat faded from memory, but the purpose of this proposed merger appears less with a view to bloating this article, so much as condensing/dealing with the mess at
1912:
The Khul' article has had quality and verification issues for more than a decade and would be better redirected in this article with the more pertinent details copied over from
981: 712:
needs to be a disambiguation page, since the only pages it links besides this one are a redlink and a couple of stubs that are closely enough related to the topic discussed in
2005:
structure, as a merge without expert editing seems inappropriate; and we seem to have no editors with the necessary subject expertise willing to put in that editorial work.
147: 1783: 1762: 1738: 1659: 1293:). And why did you remove the sourced statement about differences between madhhabs again? Repeatedly removing sourced content without explanation is considered highly 1083:; this is a subtopic, and using a title that matches our usual conventions for subtopics helps to make the article findable, as well as helping to avoid POV problems. 600:
The best source for this article would be John Esposito's Women in Muslim Family Law. I will be changing this article soon and citing my sources, including Esposito.
1802:
links to. The content we have here is much better sourced than the content in the other article. I don't see anything from the other article needs to be added here.
461:"For the majority of the world's Muslims divorce is a right pertaining to men and not to women." - I'd like a source for that. I've seen women issue the Talaq in 2084: 909: 299: 1406:
You are also misunderstanding. Where is it relies only on primary sources without secondary source. tell so that we may remove it rather than making a banner.
2019:
I have no objections. As you note, clearly I haven't had the will to enact the merger. I'm not sure I am even persuaded by my own original logic any more.
2099: 1673:
We have a paragraph on the recent triple talaq controversy in India in an appropriate section. What other information do you think should be added there?
414: 404: 79: 1144:
I can see where parenthetical title is not suitable. I don't care for "Islamic divorce." Adjectival modification of noun following, sounds pov somehow.
841:
reorganized further. Unfortunately, my knowledge is too limited to assist further in this, and there seem to be very few reliable sources in English.
524: 465:, which is predominantly Sunni, Mali and in Western Sahara. I'm not expert on this, and have not looked into this further, so I'd like a source. -- 44: 2079: 1947:
template from last year, which was based on only the proposer's view. I've had a look at executing this, but think that doing so would unbalance
1421: 1329: 1314:
Banner is about primary sources not consensus. Please kindly mention the point on which there is no consensus so that we may reach consensus.
1267: 309: 85: 380: 2094: 2089: 1084: 447: 1982:
which is a medley of overly long quotes, and large sections of prose quite clearly taken more or less from a single source apiece.
1629:
The problem isn't the material. The problem is that you've stuck it in the lead, which is supposed to be a summary of the article.
1231:
If you want to articulate your concerns about material discussing fiqh or the banner, please do it here. The article has serious
275: 371: 332: 168: 99: 30: 135: 104: 20: 1455:
Ok, I've swapped the banner for refimprove, and hopefully this will let us get past the distraction of debating the banner.
1787: 1766: 1742: 1663: 1934:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1497:
is a hardline Salafist source. I can share with you the relevant entries from Oxford encyclopedias via email if you like.
74: 1681:
compared to the other aspects of divorce law and other countries, so we should be wary of over-emphasizing it even more.
1340:
You misunderstand. Consensus is required to remove a banner. This article still relies quite a bit on primary sources.
202: 1776:
The point I am trying to make is that we need that section here or else we need to correct the links everywhere else!
1177:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
870:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
636:
and Atheists use the same word to mean divorce). I think the article either should be deleted or make it redirects to
266: 227: 65: 274:-related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join 1512:
I'm 100% down with adding better refs-- was mostly doing a quick-and-dirty to prevent deletions for uncitedness.
1417: 1325: 1263: 1535:
I'm glad this article is finally getting some improvement. It used to just be total chaos. Keep up the good work!
129: 887: 484:
Why there is no information about khula which for women is kind of no fault divorce although with no mehr. -anon
472:
I just moved that part from another article, its not my words, you are invited to change that if its inaccurate.
1720:
which lead to the section you just deleted. Please put that section back here or at least edit the link in the
1191:
Expecting some user to revert the changes because they do not want to see what the quran has to say about it.
985: 905: 1706:) which I had links pointing to from other articles. Please see if that can be incorporated into this article. 451: 125: 1088: 1023: 109: 1456: 1413: 1321: 1283: 1259: 1226: 1592:
P.S. I'm planning to add a section on historical practice and expand the section on modern practice soon.
1210: 2024: 1987: 1921: 1799: 1721: 1717: 1642: 1525: 1445: 1391: 1353: 829: 208: 175: 1753: 535:: The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Of all the lawful acts the most detestable to Allah is divorce. 466: 962:
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
1779: 1758: 1734: 1678: 1655: 1409: 1317: 1255: 883: 443: 190: 1131: 1046: 689: 645: 161: 55: 786:
It looks like there is an entirely different procedure for women to get divorced. See the article
379:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1925: 1902: 1898: 1847: 1836: 1807: 1686: 1597: 1583: 1563: 1502: 1468: 1369: 1302: 1241: 1149: 70: 1652:
I don't know much about wikipedia, so please put that sentence wherever you deem fit. Thanks!
2046: 2010: 2002: 1968: 1960: 1540: 1232: 1206: 1109: 1068: 1027: 943: 931: 918: 897: 846: 805: 776: 751: 668: 656: 532: 347: 326: 141: 51: 1972: 2020: 1983: 1948: 1917: 1890: 1862: 1711: 1630: 1513: 1487: 1433: 1379: 1341: 1080: 999: 935: 824: 637: 564: 24: 821: 437: 1101: 1042: 1004: 633: 904:
is generally used to distinguish same-name articles about unrelated topics; for example,
1126: 1034: 768: 685: 641: 363: 2073: 1894: 1843: 1803: 1697: 1682: 1613: 1593: 1579: 1559: 1498: 1464: 1365: 1298: 1290: 1237: 1145: 737: 729: 721: 717: 713: 679:
Triple Talaq is not required to perform divorce (it is more a metaphorical tradition)
632:
in English. This term is part of the language and it does not relate only to Islam (
2042: 2006: 1964: 1754:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/The_Muslim_Women_(Protection_of_Rights_on_Marriage)_Bill
1536: 1494: 1432:
We're tying to improve the article with better refs, not just chop bits out of it.
1294: 1122: 1105: 1064: 914: 842: 801: 772: 747: 664: 585: 579: 571: 541: 510: 488: 476: 258: 792:. This article, however, seems to only cover men seeking divorce. I'm not sure if 900:ā†’Ā ? ā€“ The current name is at variance with our normal method of disambiguation. 1728: 357: 353: 248: 462: 376: 1703: 1619: 2050: 2028: 2014: 1991: 1851: 1811: 1791: 1770: 1746: 1690: 1667: 1647: 1601: 1587: 1567: 1544: 1530: 1506: 1472: 1450: 1425: 1396: 1373: 1358: 1333: 1306: 1271: 1245: 1214: 1153: 1136: 1113: 1092: 1072: 1055: 922: 891: 850: 834: 809: 780: 755: 740: 693: 672: 649: 588: 574: 544: 513: 491: 479: 455: 1030:). It is not about an entirely different meaning of the term "divorce" ( 640:
and not the opposite. Will perform the changes if there's no objections.
1008: 716:
that you'd have no trouble finding the information by just reading the
629: 509:. I am surprised that anyone monitoring this page has not heard of it. 2034: 1998: 1979: 1956: 1913: 1858: 612:
I have no idea how to fix it. anonymous 07:05, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
864:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal.
616:
Islamic term??? Talaq is the literal translation of the word Divorce
242: 221: 1171:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.
1012: 797: 788: 733: 725: 709: 704: 660: 271: 1188:
I have added references to what the quran says about the topic.
1007:(prefer natural disambiguators). The article is about a topic ( 620:
I am really wondering why the term is attributed the adjective "
184: 15: 1731:
article, but the sentence with that link has been deleted!
501:
permitting the woman to remarry without the necessity of
497:
Standard form extra-judicial divorce which parallels the
1893:, please go ahead with the merger as you have outlined. 438:
http://islam.about.com/od/marriage/ss/stepstodivorce.htm
1704:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Special:MobileDiff/911890313
1620:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Special:MobileDiff/911476550
948: 720:
article. I'd like to suggest that we move the current
160: 732:
as a redirect and doing away with the old content of
1878:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
1063:"Divorce in Islam", per reasons given by AjaxSmack. 375:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 270:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 984:, please explain your reasons, taking into account 1194:Lets see who does it first and how long it takes. 1963:structure, which seems to work well for readers. 580:http://www.zawaj.com/articles/talaq_scales3.html 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 1951:, an important topic. Hence, I propose that we 1702:Pepperbeast just removed a whole section (vide 910:Black Mountain (San Benito County, California) 736:. Does anyone have strong feelings on this? - 1881:A summary of the conclusions reached follows. 174: 8: 563:absolutely halaal according to Sunni fiqh. 487:What is that? Never heard of it, Add it. -- 1777: 1756: 1732: 1653: 1407: 1315: 1253: 982:polling is not a substitute for discussion 321: 216: 796:is used to refer to both or not. Perhaps 746:I've moved it to simply "Talaq" for now. 1716:There was a link in the article titled, 1378:I don't have a problem with refimprove. 323: 218: 188: 2085:Mid-importance Islam-related articles 1830:Quranic principles and SÅ«rat aį¹­-Talāq 1724:section (I tried and failed). Thanks! 1197:Not my first time this has happened. 7: 1872:The following discussion is closed. 1856: 986:Knowledge's policy on article titles 800:should be merged into this article. 436:Well I found the about.com article ( 369:This article is within the scope of 264:This article is within the scope of 207:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 655:This may be relevant (copied from 14: 2100:Low-importance sociology articles 1752:There is another link here also: 628:is the Arabic word equivalent to 2061: 2033:OK; I've removed the templates; 1938: 1930:The discussion above is closed. 1252:supported by secondary source. 356: 346: 325: 251: 241: 220: 189: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 875:The result of the proposal was 409:This article has been rated as 389:Knowledge:WikiProject Sociology 304:This article has been rated as 2080:C-Class Islam-related articles 1959:page, maintaining the current 1800:Triple_talaq_in_India#Practice 1722:Triple talaq in India#Practice 1632: 1515: 1463:the issue has been addressed. 1435: 1381: 1343: 851:18:30, 13 September 2011 (UTC) 835:13:28, 12 September 2011 (UTC) 703:The page we currently have at 575:12:40, 23 September 2006 (UTC) 545:12:36, 23 September 2006 (UTC) 392:Template:WikiProject Sociology 1: 2051:15:11, 6 September 2023 (UTC) 1852:01:02, 14 February 2020 (UTC) 1602:00:54, 12 February 2017 (UTC) 1588:00:50, 12 February 2017 (UTC) 1568:19:17, 11 February 2017 (UTC) 974:, then sign your comment with 741:03:07, 29 December 2008 (UTC) 514:14:08, 23 February 2006 (UTC) 492:13:44, 23 February 2006 (UTC) 469:\ 15:25, July 29, 2005 (UTC) 383:and see a list of open tasks. 278:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 1545:02:26, 9 February 2017 (UTC) 1531:02:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC) 1507:02:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC) 1473:23:16, 5 February 2017 (UTC) 1451:22:48, 5 February 2017 (UTC) 1426:22:22, 5 February 2017 (UTC) 1397:22:50, 5 February 2017 (UTC) 1374:22:20, 5 February 2017 (UTC) 1359:22:08, 5 February 2017 (UTC) 1334:02:46, 5 February 2017 (UTC) 1307:01:40, 5 February 2017 (UTC) 1272:11:33, 4 February 2017 (UTC) 1246:15:59, 3 February 2017 (UTC) 1215:22:03, 30 January 2014 (UTC) 1154:20:05, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 1137:22:59, 29 October 2013 (UTC) 1114:10:05, 29 October 2013 (UTC) 1093:14:31, 28 October 2013 (UTC) 1073:07:54, 28 October 2013 (UTC) 1056:03:07, 28 October 2013 (UTC) 923:20:54, 27 October 2013 (UTC) 892:12:58, 3 November 2013 (UTC) 820:There is a merge discussion 781:23:42, 21 October 2009 (UTC) 756:23:39, 21 October 2009 (UTC) 694:15:30, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 650:15:22, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 589:17:00, 21 October 2006 (UTC) 2029:13:00, 23 August 2023 (UTC) 2015:12:49, 23 August 2023 (UTC) 1903:10:27, 4 October 2022 (UTC) 1812:03:44, 23 August 2019 (UTC) 1792:05:45, 22 August 2019 (UTC) 1784:2402:8100:282C:AEB5:0:0:0:1 1771:05:40, 22 August 2019 (UTC) 1763:2402:8100:282C:AEB5:0:0:0:1 1747:05:30, 22 August 2019 (UTC) 1739:2402:8100:282C:AEB5:0:0:0:1 1691:02:57, 22 August 2019 (UTC) 1668:19:23, 20 August 2019 (UTC) 1660:2402:8100:2818:B4FD:0:0:0:1 1648:17:45, 20 August 2019 (UTC) 1618:You reverted an edit here: 1119:Strong support for option 1 1045:" for the same reasons. ā€” 810:01:03, 15 August 2011 (UTC) 284:Knowledge:WikiProject Islam 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 2116: 2095:C-Class sociology articles 2090:WikiProject Islam articles 2059: 673:23:07, 30 March 2011 (UTC) 415:project's importance scale 310:project's importance scale 287:Template:WikiProject Islam 1992:16:31, 15 July 2023 (UTC) 1973:16:08, 15 July 2023 (UTC) 1142:Support Divorce in Islam. 1011:) in a specific context ( 480:16:08, 29 July 2005 (UTC) 408: 341: 303: 236: 215: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 1932:Please do not modify it. 1926:08:28, 8 June 2022 (UTC) 1875:Please do not modify it. 1727:There was a link in the 1174:Please do not modify it. 1166:Any additional comments: 906:Black Mountain (Belfast) 867:Please do not modify it. 771:also needs elaboration. 456:06:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC) 1939:Khul' in Summary format 1024:Divorce in South Africa 2037:remains linked with a 769:Women in Islam#Divorce 762:Women granted divorces 290:Islam-related articles 197:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 1718:Triple talaq in India 902:Topic (disambiguator) 372:WikiProject Sociology 100:Neutral point of view 1121:. Brilliantly done, 105:No original research 1553:Classical vs modern 1857:Proposed merge of 1640: 1607:Reversion of edits 1523: 1443: 1389: 1351: 395:sociology articles 203:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 1885:No opposition to 1794: 1782:comment added by 1773: 1761:comment added by 1749: 1737:comment added by 1670: 1658:comment added by 1631: 1514: 1434: 1428: 1412:comment added by 1380: 1342: 1336: 1320:comment added by 1274: 1258:comment added by 1028:Marriage in Islam 944:Divorce (Islamic) 932:Divorce (Islamic) 898:Divorce (Islamic) 657:Glossary of Islam 533:Abdullah ibn Umar 446:comment added by 429: 428: 425: 424: 421: 420: 320: 319: 316: 315: 267:WikiProject Islam 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 2107: 2065: 2064: 1949:Divorce in Islam 1943:There's a stale 1877: 1863:Divorce in Islam 1840: 1715: 1701: 1645: 1639: 1638: 1635: 1617: 1528: 1522: 1521: 1518: 1491: 1457:Chemia pattinson 1448: 1442: 1441: 1438: 1414:Chemia pattinson 1394: 1388: 1387: 1384: 1356: 1350: 1349: 1346: 1322:Chemia pattinson 1287: 1284:Chemia pattinson 1260:Chemia pattinson 1230: 1227:Chemia pattinson 1176: 1129: 1081:Divorce in Islam 1053: 1052: 1000:Divorce in Islam 978: 972: 966: 951: 936:Divorce in Islam 880: 879:Divorce in Islam 869: 832: 827: 638:Divorce in Islam 458: 397: 396: 393: 390: 387: 366: 361: 360: 350: 343: 342: 337: 329: 322: 292: 291: 288: 285: 282: 261: 256: 255: 254: 245: 238: 237: 232: 224: 217: 200: 194: 193: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 25:Divorce in Islam 16: 2115: 2114: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2062: 1941: 1936: 1935: 1910: 1873: 1866: 1834: 1832: 1709: 1695: 1643: 1636: 1633: 1611: 1609: 1575: 1555: 1526: 1519: 1516: 1485: 1483: 1446: 1439: 1436: 1392: 1385: 1382: 1354: 1347: 1344: 1281: 1224: 1222: 1186: 1184:quran reference 1181: 1172: 1162: 1127: 1048: 1047: 1043:Islamic divorce 976: 970: 964: 958: 949:Islamic divorce 947: 884:Fuhghettaboutit 878: 865: 859: 830: 825: 818: 764: 701: 699:Merger proposal 681: 634:Arab Christians 618: 606: 522: 441: 434: 394: 391: 388: 385: 384: 362: 355: 335: 289: 286: 283: 280: 279: 257: 252: 250: 230: 201:on Knowledge's 198: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 2113: 2111: 2103: 2102: 2097: 2092: 2087: 2082: 2072: 2071: 2060: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2031: 1940: 1937: 1929: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1868: 1867: 1865: 1855: 1831: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1750: 1725: 1707: 1674: 1608: 1605: 1574: 1571: 1554: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1482: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1276: 1275: 1221: 1218: 1185: 1182: 1180: 1179: 1168: 1161: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1139: 1116: 1095: 1075: 1058: 1035:Divorce (film) 1003:" per nom and 991: 990: 965:*'''Support''' 957: 954: 953: 952: 938: 895: 873: 872: 860: 858: 857:Requested move 855: 854: 853: 817: 814: 813: 812: 763: 760: 759: 758: 700: 697: 680: 677: 676: 675: 617: 614: 605: 602: 593: 568: 567: 558: 557: 549: 538: 537: 521: 518: 517: 516: 433: 430: 427: 426: 423: 422: 419: 418: 411:Low-importance 407: 401: 400: 398: 381:the discussion 368: 367: 364:Society portal 351: 339: 338: 336:Lowā€‘importance 330: 318: 317: 314: 313: 306:Mid-importance 302: 296: 295: 293: 276:the discussion 263: 262: 246: 234: 233: 231:Midā€‘importance 225: 213: 212: 206: 195: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2112: 2101: 2098: 2096: 2093: 2091: 2088: 2086: 2083: 2081: 2078: 2077: 2075: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2036: 2032: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2004: 2000: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1933: 1928: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1915: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1879: 1876: 1870: 1869: 1864: 1860: 1854: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1838: 1837:Koreangauteng 1829: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1801: 1796: 1795: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1775: 1774: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1755: 1751: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1730: 1726: 1723: 1719: 1713: 1708: 1705: 1699: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1680: 1679:WP:PROPORTION 1675: 1672: 1671: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1646: 1641: 1628: 1627: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1615: 1606: 1604: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1590: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1573:Block replace 1572: 1570: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1552: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1529: 1524: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1489: 1480: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1449: 1444: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1398: 1395: 1390: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1357: 1352: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1285: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1234: 1228: 1219: 1217: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1201: 1198: 1195: 1192: 1189: 1183: 1178: 1175: 1169: 1167: 1164: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1140: 1138: 1135: 1134: 1130: 1124: 1120: 1117: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1096: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1085:168.12.253.66 1082: 1079: 1076: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1059: 1057: 1054: 1051: 1044: 1040: 1037:). But I am 1036: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1002: 1001: 996: 993: 992: 989: 987: 983: 975: 971:*'''Oppose''' 969: 963: 960: 959: 955: 950: 945: 942: 939: 937: 933: 930: 927: 926: 925: 924: 920: 916: 911: 907: 903: 899: 894: 893: 889: 885: 881: 871: 868: 862: 861: 856: 852: 848: 844: 839: 838: 837: 836: 833: 828: 826:Pass a Method 823: 815: 811: 807: 803: 799: 795: 791: 790: 785: 784: 783: 782: 778: 774: 770: 761: 757: 753: 749: 745: 744: 743: 742: 739: 735: 731: 730:Talaq (Nikah) 727: 723: 722:Talaq (Nikah) 719: 718:Talaq (Nikah) 715: 714:Talaq (Nikah) 711: 706: 698: 696: 695: 691: 687: 678: 674: 670: 666: 662: 658: 654: 653: 652: 651: 647: 643: 639: 635: 631: 627: 623: 615: 613: 610: 603: 601: 598: 594: 591: 590: 587: 582: 581: 577: 576: 573: 566: 565: 560: 559: 556: 552: 551: 550: 547: 546: 543: 536: 534: 529: 528: 527: 526: 519: 515: 512: 508: 504: 500: 496: 495: 494: 493: 490: 485: 482: 481: 478: 473: 470: 468: 464: 459: 457: 453: 449: 448:27.99.100.158 445: 439: 431: 416: 412: 406: 403: 402: 399: 382: 378: 374: 373: 365: 359: 354: 352: 349: 345: 344: 340: 334: 331: 328: 324: 311: 307: 301: 298: 297: 294: 277: 273: 269: 268: 260: 249: 247: 244: 240: 239: 235: 229: 226: 223: 219: 214: 210: 204: 196: 192: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 2038: 1955:the current 1952: 1945:being merged 1944: 1942: 1931: 1911: 1886: 1880: 1874: 1871: 1833: 1778:ā€”Ā Preceding 1757:ā€”Ā Preceding 1733:ā€”Ā Preceding 1654:ā€”Ā Preceding 1610: 1591: 1576: 1556: 1495:IslamQA.info 1484: 1460: 1408:ā€”Ā Preceding 1405: 1316:ā€”Ā Preceding 1313: 1254:ā€”Ā Preceding 1223: 1207:Khawar.nehal 1205: 1202: 1199: 1196: 1193: 1190: 1187: 1173: 1170: 1165: 1141: 1132: 1118: 1097: 1077: 1060: 1049: 1038: 1031: 1020: 1019:a subtopic ( 1016: 998: 994: 979: 973: 967: 961: 940: 928: 901: 896: 876: 874: 866: 863: 819: 793: 787: 765: 702: 682: 625: 621: 619: 611: 607: 599: 595: 592: 583: 578: 569: 561: 553: 548: 539: 530: 523: 506: 502: 498: 486: 483: 474: 471: 467:Irishpunktom 460: 442:ā€” Preceding 435: 410: 370: 305: 265: 259:Islam portal 209:WikiProjects 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 2021:Iskandar323 1984:Iskandar323 1918:Iskandar323 1891:Iskandar323 1712:Pepperbeast 1488:Pepperbeast 724:article to 148:free images 31:not a forum 2074:Categories 2041:template. 2003:WP:SUMMARY 1961:WP:SUMMARY 1729:Love jihad 1295:disruptive 1233:WP:PRIMARY 1200:Regards, 1160:Discussion 728:, leaving 1050:AjaxSmack 1041:keen on " 686:Bestofmed 642:Bestofmed 604:reference 531:Narrated 463:Indonesia 386:Sociology 377:sociology 333:Sociology 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 2066:Resolved 1895:Felix QW 1844:Eperoton 1804:Eperoton 1780:unsigned 1759:unsigned 1735:unsigned 1698:Eperoton 1683:Eperoton 1656:unsigned 1614:Eperoton 1594:Eperoton 1580:Eperoton 1560:Eperoton 1499:Eperoton 1481:Websites 1465:Eperoton 1422:contribs 1410:unsigned 1366:Eperoton 1330:contribs 1318:unsigned 1299:Eperoton 1268:contribs 1256:unsigned 1238:Eperoton 1146:Student7 1102:WP:NCDAB 1005:WP:NCDAB 980:. Since 941:Option 2 929:Option 1 877:move to 738:AdelaMae 503:muhallil 444:unsigned 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 2043:Klbrain 2007:Klbrain 1965:Klbrain 1537:Kaldari 1203:Khawar 1123:Nyttend 1106:Neljack 1098:Support 1078:Support 1065:Kaldari 1061:Support 1009:divorce 995:Support 915:Nyttend 843:Kaldari 802:Kaldari 773:Kaldari 748:Kaldari 665:Kaldari 630:divorce 622:islamic 586:Striver 572:Striver 542:Striver 525:12:2173 511:David91 507:halalah 489:Striver 477:Striver 413:on the 308:on the 199:C-class 154:WPĀ refs 142:scholar 1644:(talk) 1634:Pepper 1527:(talk) 1517:Pepper 1447:(talk) 1437:Pepper 1393:(talk) 1383:Pepper 1355:(talk) 1345:Pepper 1291:WP:MTR 956:Survey 520:Hadith 205:scale. 126:Google 2035:Khul' 1999:Khul' 1980:khul' 1957:Khul' 1914:Khul' 1887:merge 1861:into 1859:Khul' 1637:Beast 1520:Beast 1461:after 1440:Beast 1386:Beast 1348:Beast 1133:Slash 1013:Islam 816:Merge 798:khula 794:talaq 789:khula 734:Talaq 726:Talaq 710:Talaq 705:Talaq 661:dawah 626:Talaq 499:talaq 281:Islam 272:Islam 228:Islam 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 2047:talk 2039:main 2025:talk 2011:talk 1988:talk 1969:talk 1953:keep 1922:talk 1899:talk 1848:talk 1808:talk 1788:talk 1767:talk 1743:talk 1687:talk 1664:talk 1598:talk 1584:talk 1564:talk 1541:talk 1503:talk 1469:talk 1418:talk 1370:talk 1326:talk 1303:talk 1264:talk 1242:talk 1220:Lead 1211:talk 1150:talk 1128:Red 1110:talk 1100:per 1089:talk 1069:talk 1017:i.e. 977:~~~~ 919:talk 908:and 888:talk 847:talk 831:talk 822:here 806:talk 777:talk 752:talk 690:talk 669:talk 646:talk 452:talk 432:Misc 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 1039:not 1032:cf. 1026:or 1021:cf. 1015:), 882:.-- 663:." 624:"? 505:or 405:Low 300:Mid 176:TWL 2076:: 2049:) 2027:) 2013:) 1990:) 1971:) 1924:) 1901:) 1889:: 1850:) 1810:) 1790:) 1769:) 1745:) 1689:) 1666:) 1600:) 1586:) 1566:) 1543:) 1505:) 1471:) 1424:) 1420:ā€¢ 1372:) 1332:) 1328:ā€¢ 1305:) 1297:. 1270:) 1266:ā€¢ 1244:) 1213:) 1152:) 1125:. 1112:) 1104:. 1091:) 1071:) 968:or 946:ā†’ 934:ā†’ 921:) 890:) 849:) 808:) 779:) 754:) 692:) 671:) 648:) 584:-- 570:-- 540:-- 475:-- 454:) 156:) 54:; 2045:( 2023:( 2009:( 1986:( 1967:( 1920:( 1897:( 1846:( 1839:: 1835:@ 1806:( 1786:( 1765:( 1741:( 1714:: 1710:@ 1700:: 1696:@ 1685:( 1662:( 1616:: 1612:@ 1596:( 1582:( 1562:( 1539:( 1501:( 1490:: 1486:@ 1467:( 1416:( 1368:( 1324:( 1301:( 1286:: 1282:@ 1262:( 1240:( 1229:: 1225:@ 1209:( 1148:( 1108:( 1087:( 1067:( 997:" 988:. 917:( 886:( 845:( 804:( 775:( 750:( 688:( 667:( 644:( 450:( 417:. 312:. 211:: 172:Ā· 166:Ā· 158:Ā· 151:Ā· 145:Ā· 139:Ā· 133:Ā· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Divorce in Islam
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WPĀ refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Islam
WikiProject icon
Islam portal

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘