900:
Byzantine music, and is still current in post-Byzantine ecclesiastical music. Second, the use of terms "whole tone" and "semitone" to characterize the diatonic scales in this sense is inappropriate. In the
Byzantine sense of this term, a diatonic scale consists of two tetrachords with intervals of 12, 10, and 8 microtones (where 12 microtones = a "whole tone" in the contemporary sense (= 1000 cents)). The Byzantine diatonic scale thus involves no semi-tones (= 6 microtones). The Byzantine enharmonic scales are closer to the contemporary major or minor scales-- their tetrachords consist of intervals of 12 and 6 microtones. Byzantine chromatic scales are any scale that consists of tetrachords whose middle interval is larger than the intervals on either side of it. There are two types of chromatic scale-- soft and hard. In a soft chromatic scale, the middle interval of the tetrachord is less than the sum of the intervals next to it (e.g., 8, 14, and 8 microtones-- Byzantine "mode 2"), while in a hard chromatic scale the middle interval of the tetrachord is greater than the sum of the intervals next to it (e.g., 6, 20 and 4-- Byzantine "mode plagal 2").
485:
balance contention, not in order to inform the reader, as has been commented here and there by various editors who have not been granted a shareholding. Your comment repesents you and the other shareholders as owners of this mess. Not that you are to blame for it: ALL articles written under such circumstances end up unreadable. Your reverts already constitute edit war. I could see you would most likely do so - that is why I did not complete the work. The present use of the source you mention (its caption) are equally unsupported btw. And it is a matter of Greek GENERA - a matter dealt with very poorly throughout wiki, since many editors take for granted the language and ideas of homophony and equal temperament which from the beginning renders their effusions pretty much useless. Take note that this article must be rewritten.
735:
A minor? Do you think that the chord E–G#–B is diatonic in A minor? How about the chord D–F#–A in A minor? How about that chord in the ascending form of the A melodic minor scale? How about the note F# in A minor (in the ascending melodic fragment E-F#-G#-A): diatonic? Is the interval G#–C diatonic? Is it diatonic in A minor? Do you think that these questions all make sense? If not, why not? Please explain your answers; and if an answer is "no", say whether the feature in question is instead chromatic, or what (if anything specifiable at all in the same domain).
202:
22:
694:
simple chords or harmonies, are completely absent in the face of minor technicalities. The idea is moderately difficult to grasp, and as such should have a clear and concise description for the readers who come to the article to learn about the topic, not discuss abstract advanced theory. This article gives the impression that the core idea has been overcomplicated just for the sake of it.
74:
53:
84:
1187:
states that this use of the word comes to Greek through the French "diatonique" which comes from the Greek and changes meaning. I would add the sources to your footnote but I spent too much time figuring out how to make citations and I have to leave. I'll do it tomorrow, but if I forget at least there is this Talk entry...
549:, reading "Given the background presented above, we now move on to address …". Another example is the subsection "Modern extensions of the diatonic idea", with its air of academic finger-waggling: "Traditionally, and in all uses discussed above, …" and "Exactly which heptatonic scales (and even which
453:." That last reference, to the 18th-century source, is by no means enough to warrant the claim that the Greeks established a binary opposition of the diatonic and the chromatic. They did not, in fact. Nor is the reference to Greek modes informative. I would be a matter of Greek tetrachords, not modes.
734:
straightforward – certainly in their elementary applications. There are others (and I am among them) who think that modern and current usage is deeply conflicted. As a test: do you think that the diminished 7th on G# (both as interval and chord) is diatonic? Do you think it is diatonic in A major? In
1186:
agrees with the
Byzantine writer, and states that "διατονικός" (diatonic) comes from "διάτονος", which I would guess everyone agrees with, since it is a word for the genus, at least it is in this Byzantine text. This is in reference to the diatonic genus. In reference to "diatonic music", Babiniotis
951:
I cannot see anybody being confused between sources on optics and sources on music theory, or not thinking to add "music" to a search term once they see search results filled with optics. To additionally go so far as to include a reference that would never have any relevance to the article just adds
1245:, are restricted to the scale to which they are tuned. Among this latter class, some instruments, such as the piano, are always tuned to a chromatic scale, and can be played in any key, while others are restricted to a diatonic scale, and therefore to a particular key. Some instruments, such as the
353:
In the modern meanings, perhaps something should be mentioned about intervals above augmented seconds. I have a teacher who defines diatonic as 'any seven note scale with no consecutive interval larger than an augmented 2nd'. This seems weird at first, you think 'any seven note scale'? But they're
484:
I have made myself familiar with the arguments that led to this unreadable article with its non-wiki layout, and I have noted all the various theoretical shortcomings and personal researches that led to its current parlous state. You express yourself clearly: this article is as it is in order to
693:
The lack of flow in this article makes it practically unreadable even to someone experienced in musical theory. The abundance of technical terms and references to others only compound how vague the content has actually become. Diatonic and
Chromatic tones in the most basic applications, such as
553:
of those scales) should count as diatonic is unsettled, as shown above. But the broad selection principle itself is not disputed, at least as a theoretical convenience." Both of these passages include the dangerous (from a
Knowledge (XXG) point of view) reference to "above" discussions, when a
738:
When you have given your clear answers to all these questions, you might like to show references that support your answers. In some cases, references can be provided that give a different answer. The exercise is interesting, and it affects basic music theory – not just the ethereal reaches of
899:
It seems like the (brief) discussion in the article currently on the original meanings of the terms "diatonic" "chromatic" (and "enharmonic") in ancient Greek musical theory needs expansion and reworking. First, it should be noted that this is the same meaning of these terms that was used in
276:
of the history is important in its own right, and also relevant to a deep understanding of how the terms are used today. I also think that the notes are essential, and in no way detract from the readability of the main text, since they stand apart from it. In fact, they help to keep things
722:
PP, this article has had a troubled history from the start. It could certainly do with some re-fashioning, now that the white-hot contention has subsided. But it will not be as easy as many think. It also needs to be brought into line with
Knowledge (XXG) referencing standards and the
264:
Yes, Hyacinth. I've been looking through the article myself recently and thinking we might re-work a couple of things. The article grew up in a difficult environment, not one that was conducive to a natural exposition. Other articles treated these terms abysmally, especially the term
1045:(Chromatic meaning either all the 12 notes avalible or an Ancient Greek particular tuning of the tetrachord. Diatonic meaning either modes of the Major scale, modes of the established scale and rarely only the modes of Cmaj, the latter of which I could find any sources for.)
1041:
This page is quite a mess and difficult to comprehend, even for those who are well versed in music theory. It might be easier to edit and comprehend this page if we split it into two sections. Especially considering both diatonic and chromatic have multiple meanings.
576:
objected last June under the heading "Non-unique headings", does not look very "encyclopedic" (yes, yes, I know—whatever that is supposed to mean), either, serving mainly to add to the air of pontification. In my opinion, it is more liable to confuse than help the
354:
actually quite limited. I haven't sat down and worked out how many variants you can make beyond the obvious maj/min modes, but might be interesting to do so... Maybe you could add an additional qualifier that there can only be one augmented 2nd (if any) -
162:
248:
I propose that clear definitions be placed in the first section(s) and that history follow definitions. The current definitions found in the lead are unclear to the inexperienced and the history of these terms is not enlightening in that respect.
404:
The above is confusing. I assume when you say 'the strictest understanding', you mean the only-white-notes-definition of diatonic, but you don't say so, and it leaves people wondering why you can't have a major triad on V from harmonic minor.
445:
I have undone recent edits that alter the balance we had worked out through painful and painstaking dialogue, months ago. Please: familiarise yourself with the matters of contention before making substantive changes.
975:
I agree. It seems overly fussy to caution the reader that searching for "chromatic interval" may bring up non-musical results. Such distracting clutter has no place in a tightly-written
Knowledge (XXG) article. __
1182:, Quadrivium, Chapter E') which states that the word "διάτονος" comes from the verb "διατείνω", which means to stretch, since "...the voice is most stretched by it" (voice not necessarily meaning human voice).
1298:
Also, if one is talking about being restricted to diatonic notes or not, I think choosing the violin as an example of an "unrestricted" instrument is not a good idea, because the violin can play
401:"If the strictest understanding of the term diatonic scale were adhered to, even a major triad on the dominant scale degree in C minor (G–B♮–D) would be chromatic or altered in C minor."
449:
There were also some factual difficulties: unfounded assertions like "They are often used as a contrasting pair, a usage that originated in the ancient Greek classification of
1003:
Therefore, the title of this article be "Diatonicism and
Chromaticism." Then the introduction would say something like "Diatonicism and chromaticism refer to..." Agree?
280:
I should say this: proceed with caution! It's a thorny one to keep balanced and consensual, and useful both to beginners and to those trying to dig beneath the surface.
140:
398:"Four basic techniques produce chromatic harmony under this definition: modal mixture, secondary dominants..." Might 'modal interchange' be a better choice here?
105:, theory terminology, music theorists, and musical analysis on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
648:
The
Bibliography doesn't strike me as very encyclopedic, much more essay-like. What exactly is it there for? And why is it after the Notes and References section?
1402:
1288:
are chromatic (and so can be used to play in a diatonic or chromatic way, as one chooses). Also, the glockenspiel is much less well-known than piano or guitar.
1392:
130:
1397:
1387:
1148:
1141:
106:
942:
Commenting here for discussion following revert. The article currently includes the following contextual clarification, which I suggest is removed:
710:
180:
545:
I was not the person who placed that flag, but I would imagine that it may have been prompted by passages such as the one beginning the section
1021:
Disagree. I understand the point you're making, but those nouns have different connotations than the adjectives, and are cumbersome besides. —
337:
219:
97:
58:
1365:
961:
888:
426:
1213:
1051:
907:
946:"(Of relevance in searching for the term chromatic interval, note that the phrase has distinct meanings outside of music theory. )"
184:
628:
It's only a drop in an ocean, but I think all the first-person stuff is now changed (apart from direct quotations from sources).—
922:"12 microtones = 1 whole tone"? "1 whole tone = 1000 cents"? "Post-Byzantine ecclesiastical music"? What planet are you from? —
277:
streamlined in the main text. It can now be made more streamlined, and one or two more things may be transferable to the notes.
1206:
The musical example from Dido and Aeneas is a bit ugly and has a hyphen/dash missing in the word "welcome" in the song text.
33:
1273:
to be about being diatonic or chromatic, but I don't think that being diatonic or chromatic is talked of as a difference of
509:, point 3, says: "Section names should preferably be unique within a page; this applies even for the names of subsections."
706:
997:
506:
845:
957:
1170:
Wow, you have a pretty in depth footnote on the subject! I just finished correcting an etymology paragraph in the
981:
333:
228:
884:
430:
410:
370:
359:
1369:
965:
39:
21:
1217:
702:
1055:
911:
1209:
903:
876:
698:
422:
325:
653:
329:
880:
1192:
1175:
633:
582:
563:
953:
1076:
977:
857:
792:
516:
1328:
1183:
1026:
927:
490:
406:
355:
1156:
1127:
676:
618:
535:
530:
How is this article written like a personal reflection or essay and how should it be cleaned up?
383:
304:
254:
234:
1291:
I think a better example of a common instrument which is largely designed to be diatonic is the
1006:
172:
1179:
649:
463:
287:
176:
825:
1188:
840:
830:
629:
578:
559:
230:
201:
1306:, as well as both chromatically and diatonically. I think it is best to leave the issue of
1109:
668:
664:
1010:
853:
816:
Skytopia : Tuning & Music Scales Theory - Why are there 12 notes in Equal temperament?
788:
771:
Ask a
Question - My Music Theory. Free lessons and exercises in Music Theory for everyone.
573:
512:
374:
572:
Come to think of it, that long, second "Notes" sections, to the caption of which editor
558:"chromatic", instead of the other way around) could render these sentences meaningless.—
1324:
1022:
923:
780:
486:
321:
This is not the true meaning of diatonic. Its really quite simple but im not telling.
996:
Encyclopedic entries are generally titled as nouns, not adjectives. Knowledge (XXG)'s
505:
This article has one section titled "Notes" and also one subsection titled "Notes".
1381:
1355:
1347:
1171:
1152:
1123:
835:
672:
614:
531:
379:
300:
269:. They still do, and they stand in need of attention far more than this article does.
250:
601:
Replace vague references to "above", etc., with specific references or section links
1359:
1351:
1285:
1242:
450:
102:
89:
1373:
1332:
1221:
1196:
1160:
1131:
1059:
1030:
1014:
985:
969:
931:
915:
892:
861:
796:
753:
714:
680:
657:
637:
622:
586:
567:
539:
520:
494:
478:
434:
414:
387:
363:
341:
308:
290:
258:
232:
161:
1048:
Obviously the two pages would be called 'Diatonic' and 'Chromatic' respectively.
554:
perfectly reasonable reorganisation (for example, in order to discuss "diatonic"
1292:
765:
79:
826:
Is the chromatic scale a result of the diatonic scale? - iBreatheMusic Forums
815:
1253:, and glockenspiel, are available in both diatonic and chromatic versions...
1246:
1174:
article, since, with the help of the most widely accepted Greek dictionary (
1087:
1098:
810:
820:
770:
1238:
73:
52:
1077:
https://www.soundonsound.com/sound-advice/q-what-does-diatonic-mean
807:
Here are some additional links, perhaps with decreasing relevance.
1343:
1320:
Tin whistle as example of instrument (mostly) diatonic instrument.
1258:
I think that a lot of this is confusing, and possibly incorrect.
1000:
dictates that "Titles should normally be nouns or noun phrases."
775:
1250:
1149:
a thread about restructuring this article and other related ones
869:
As an amateur musician I can't make any sense of this article.
235:
195:
156:
15:
1280:
A glockenspiel seems to be a strange choice of example of a
1277:. Tuning I think refers to equal temperament, meantone etc.
299:
Rather than insufficient context, it's overly technical. :)
1151:
over at the relevant WikiProject if anyone is interested. —
1284:
instrument, especially as all the instruments pictured in
1140:
Talk of restructuring this and related articles over at
1110:
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/us/diatonic
742:
Other editors may like to respond to this challenge too.
1342:
11 of the 15 diatonic major scales are designed by the
831:
Autoharp Talk • View topic - What does "diatonic" mean?
776:
Ask Edly about
Playing Music and Learning Music Theory
1263:...restricted to the scale to which they are tuned..
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1346:. The tenuous pianistic diatonic major scales are
1295:, though it can be played chromatically as well.
1232:The section "Musical instruments" starts with:
811:Lucille Reilly's Most Frequently Asked Questions
507:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style#Section headings
1338:11 designed diatonic major scales by the piano
766:MusicGoals Music Theory Questions and Answers.
8:
1302:note within its range, and therefore in any
378:38 seven note collections (scales/groups).
19:
1241:, can play any scale; others, such as the
1207:
901:
47:
1317:Piano as example of chromatic instrument,
836:The Development of Musical Tuning Systems
167:It is requested that one or more musical
1403:Knowledge (XXG) requested audio of music
1088:http://www.tonalcentre.org/Diatonic.html
762:The following links may be of interest.
610:Add images & audio for clarification
115:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Music theory
1099:https://www.britannica.com/art/diatonic
1069:
726:There are those who consider the terms
49:
669:WP:LAY#Standard appendices and footers
956:, particularly as there is already a
952:clutter. In my view this contravenes
456:Still, good to see your interest. :)
7:
1393:Low-importance Music theory articles
1313:I suggest a re-write would be good:
185:Knowledge (XXG):Requested recordings
95:This article is within the scope of
547:Modern meanings of "diatonic scale"
38:It is of interest to the following
781:Music Theory Questions and Answers
14:
1398:WikiProject Music theory articles
1388:Start-Class Music theory articles
1037:Spliting this page into two pages
607:Discuss diatonic before chromatic
118:Template:WikiProject Music theory
1166:Etymology of the word "diatonic"
200:
179:and included in this article to
160:
82:
72:
51:
20:
1178:), I found a Byzantine source (
687:General comments on the article
135:This article has been rated as
1237:Some instruments, such as the
862:01:21, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
797:19:16, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
754:04:49, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
715:17:15, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
638:19:35, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
388:03:40, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
1:
1265:.": I think the reference to
109:and see a list of open tasks.
1222:14:26, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
986:15:50, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
970:14:18, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
932:07:40, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
916:16:20, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
435:00:26, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
342:19:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
291:01:58, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
259:01:35, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
1374:13:39, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
1197:22:40, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
1060:01:51, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
1031:06:14, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
1015:01:48, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
960:at the top of the article.
598:Rewrite in the third person
1419:
841:Scale Networks and Debussy
623:02:53, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
587:17:43, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
568:17:36, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
540:14:16, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
141:project's importance scale
1161:03:20, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
1132:03:23, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
1122:I agree wholeheartedly. —
938:Reference to opthalmology
893:02:06, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
681:08:12, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
658:06:19, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
521:19:29, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
187:for more on this request.
134:
67:
46:
1333:12:57, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
1142:WikiProject Music Theory
495:13:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
479:11:51, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
371:List of pitch class sets
309:01:28, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
98:WikiProject Music theory
415:00:57, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
364:00:02, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
846:Music Solo Performance
28:This article is rated
1310:out of this section.
1176:Babiniotis Dictionary
121:Music theory articles
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
739:academic musicology.
604:Remove condescension
1184:Georgios Babiniotis
958:disambiguation link
501:Non-unique headings
244:First section topic
181:improve its quality
871:-- Graphics Geezer
703:PaintingPerception
394:a couple of points
34:content assessment
1224:
1212:comment added by
1180:George Pachymeres
918:
906:comment added by
896:
879:comment added by
751:
718:
701:comment added by
475:
425:comment added by
377:. There are : -->
375:PC Set Calculator
345:
328:comment added by
241:
240:
191:
190:
177:Wikimedia Commons
155:
154:
151:
150:
147:
146:
1410:
1202:Musical examples
1112:
1107:
1101:
1096:
1090:
1085:
1079:
1074:
895:
873:
872:
752:
749:
717:
695:
476:
473:
466:
437:
344:
322:
286:
272:I do think that
236:
204:
196:
164:
157:
123:
122:
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
85:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1418:
1417:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1378:
1377:
1340:
1230:
1204:
1168:
1145:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1108:
1104:
1097:
1093:
1086:
1082:
1075:
1071:
1039:
998:Manual of Style
994:
978:Just plain Bill
940:
874:
870:
748:
745:
696:
689:
667:, specifically
646:
528:
503:
472:
469:
464:
460:
443:
420:
396:
330:Mikialrobertson
323:
284:
246:
237:
231:
209:
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
88:
83:
81:
61:
29:
12:
11:
5:
1416:
1414:
1406:
1405:
1400:
1395:
1390:
1380:
1379:
1366:189.50.177.145
1339:
1336:
1322:
1321:
1318:
1229:
1226:
1203:
1200:
1167:
1164:
1144:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1114:
1113:
1102:
1091:
1080:
1068:
1067:
1063:
1038:
1035:
1034:
1033:
993:
990:
989:
988:
962:81.132.165.192
939:
936:
935:
934:
881:GraphicsGeezer
867:
866:
865:
864:
850:
849:
848:
843:
838:
833:
828:
823:
818:
813:
802:
801:
800:
799:
785:
784:
783:
778:
773:
768:
757:
756:
746:
743:
740:
736:
724:
688:
685:
684:
683:
645:
642:
641:
640:
612:
611:
608:
605:
602:
599:
592:
591:
590:
589:
527:
524:
510:
502:
499:
498:
497:
470:
461:
442:
439:
427:125.239.241.35
407:Dominant7flat9
395:
392:
391:
390:
356:Dominant7flat9
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
346:
314:
313:
312:
311:
294:
293:
281:
278:
270:
245:
242:
239:
238:
233:
229:
227:
224:
223:
215:
214:
211:
210:
205:
199:
193:
189:
188:
165:
153:
152:
149:
148:
145:
144:
137:Low-importance
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
62:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1415:
1404:
1401:
1399:
1396:
1394:
1391:
1389:
1386:
1385:
1383:
1376:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1363:
1361:
1357:
1356:C-sharp major
1353:
1349:
1348:F-sharp major
1345:
1337:
1335:
1334:
1330:
1326:
1319:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1311:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1296:
1294:
1289:
1287:
1283:
1278:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1264:
1259:
1256:
1254:
1252:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1233:
1227:
1225:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1214:86.159.240.17
1211:
1201:
1199:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1172:Genus (music)
1165:
1163:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1143:
1139:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1111:
1106:
1103:
1100:
1095:
1092:
1089:
1084:
1081:
1078:
1073:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1052:220.101.84.46
1049:
1046:
1043:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1001:
999:
991:
987:
983:
979:
974:
973:
972:
971:
967:
963:
959:
955:
949:
947:
943:
937:
933:
929:
925:
921:
920:
919:
917:
913:
909:
905:
897:
894:
890:
886:
882:
878:
863:
859:
855:
851:
847:
844:
842:
839:
837:
834:
832:
829:
827:
824:
822:
819:
817:
814:
812:
809:
808:
806:
805:
804:
803:
798:
794:
790:
786:
782:
779:
777:
774:
772:
769:
767:
764:
763:
761:
760:
759:
758:
755:
744:
741:
737:
733:
729:
725:
721:
720:
719:
716:
712:
708:
704:
700:
691:
686:
682:
678:
674:
670:
666:
662:
661:
660:
659:
655:
651:
643:
639:
635:
631:
627:
626:
625:
624:
620:
616:
609:
606:
603:
600:
597:
596:
595:
588:
584:
580:
575:
571:
570:
569:
565:
561:
557:
552:
548:
544:
543:
542:
541:
537:
533:
525:
523:
522:
518:
514:
508:
500:
496:
492:
488:
483:
482:
481:
480:
468:
467:
457:
454:
452:
447:
440:
438:
436:
432:
428:
424:
417:
416:
412:
408:
402:
399:
393:
389:
385:
381:
376:
372:
368:
367:
366:
365:
361:
357:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
310:
306:
302:
298:
297:
296:
295:
292:
289:
282:
279:
275:
271:
268:
263:
262:
261:
260:
256:
252:
243:
226:
225:
222:
221:
217:
216:
213:
212:
208:
203:
198:
197:
194:
186:
183:. Please see
182:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
159:
158:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1364:
1360:C-flat major
1352:G-flat major
1341:
1323:
1312:
1307:
1303:
1299:
1297:
1290:
1286:glockenspiel
1281:
1279:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1260:
1257:
1243:glockenspiel
1236:
1234:
1231:
1228:Glockenspiel
1208:— Preceding
1205:
1169:
1146:
1105:
1094:
1083:
1072:
1064:
1050:
1047:
1044:
1040:
1005:
1002:
995:
950:
945:
944:
941:
908:108.20.9.154
902:— Preceding
898:
875:— Preceding
868:
731:
727:
697:— Preceding
692:
690:
650:Mahlerlover1
647:
644:Bibliography
613:
593:
555:
550:
546:
529:
504:
462:
458:
455:
448:
444:
441:Recent edits
419:C+D = E :O
418:
403:
400:
397:
352:
273:
266:
247:
218:
206:
192:
168:
136:
112:Music theory
103:music theory
96:
90:Music portal
59:Music theory
40:WikiProjects
1293:tin whistle
1282:restricted
1189:123popos123
992:Noun titles
954:WP:OFFTOPIC
630:Jerome Kohl
579:Jerome Kohl
560:Jerome Kohl
421:—Preceding
324:—Preceding
169:audio files
30:Start-class
1382:Categories
1065:References
854:Wavelength
821:Harp-L FAQ
789:Wavelength
577:beginner.—
574:Wavelength
513:Wavelength
220:/Archive 1
1325:FrankSier
1271:intended
1247:harmonica
1147:There is
1023:Wahoofive
924:Wahoofive
732:chromatic
487:Redheylin
1210:unsigned
1153:Mesocarp
1124:Mesocarp
904:unsigned
889:contribs
877:unsigned
728:diatonic
711:contribs
699:unsigned
673:Hyacinth
615:Hyacinth
532:Hyacinth
423:unsigned
380:Hyacinth
338:contribs
326:unsigned
301:Hyacinth
267:diatonic
251:Hyacinth
207:Archives
173:uploaded
594:Goals:
474:oetica!
285:Noetica
139:on the
1308:tuning
1304:tuning
1275:tuning
1267:scale
1239:violin
1017:Pigi5
750:oetica
665:WP:LAY
556:before
36:scale.
1344:piano
1007:Pigi5
723:like.
663:See:
551:modes
526:Essay
451:modes
369:See:
1370:talk
1358:and
1329:talk
1300:any
1255:".
1251:harp
1218:talk
1193:talk
1157:talk
1128:talk
1056:talk
1027:talk
1011:talk
982:talk
966:talk
928:talk
912:talk
885:talk
858:talk
793:talk
730:and
707:talk
677:talk
654:talk
634:talk
619:talk
583:talk
564:talk
536:talk
517:talk
491:talk
431:talk
411:talk
384:talk
373:and
360:talk
334:talk
305:talk
288:Talk
255:talk
1269:is
511:--
274:all
175:to
171:be
131:Low
1384::
1372:)
1362:.
1354:,
1350:,
1331:)
1249:,
1220:)
1195:)
1159:)
1130:)
1058:)
1029:)
1013:)
984:)
968:)
948:.
930:)
914:)
891:)
887:•
860:)
795:)
713:)
709:•
679:)
671:.
656:)
636:)
621:)
585:)
566:)
538:)
519:)
493:)
477:–
433:)
413:)
386:)
362:)
340:)
336:•
307:)
283:–
257:)
1368:(
1327:(
1261:"
1235:"
1216:(
1191:(
1155:(
1126:(
1054:(
1025:(
1009:(
980:(
964:(
926:(
910:(
883:(
856:(
852:—
791:(
787:—
747:N
705:(
675:(
652:(
632:(
617:(
581:(
562:(
534:(
515:(
489:(
471:N
465:⊥
459:–
429:(
409:(
382:(
358:(
332:(
303:(
253:(
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
