Talk:Dracula - Knowledge (XXG)

4955:

character was 'inspired' by Tepes or that Stoker knew anything about him apart from his title of Voivode and the Dracula name, but it does mean Van Helsing is stating the historical Vlad Tepes is the character in the novel. It seems to me there is a distinction to be made (and is being made by the quoted shcolars) between being "inspired by" knowledge of the historical figure and his practices, and simply using the name and attributing it to the historical figure. Dan Farson's comment as quoted above, taken at face value, could be taken as implying Stoker had never heard of Vlad Tepes. That clearly can't have been the case, because as the relevant passage from the novel makes clear, Stoker knows there was a historical figure named Dracula who had been Voivode of Transylvania. Whether he knew him as Vlad Tepes or simply as Dracula seems to me to be beside the point.

5077: 3337:

asking for was sales figures. Those don't exist. We can only work things out from context, but the amount of writing required to elaborate on "the novel didn't sell well" (from a high qualify source) feels excessive. I could expand that Stoker was forced to take out a loan a few years later, for example, for the family's move, but I don't know what it adds. The novel was enjoyed by those who read it at the time (as the end of reception indicates), but Stoker did not make much money from it, and his wife was very poor after his death. —

461: 4171:

divided into more subvariants such as Muntenian and Oltenian, probably the one in southeastern Transylvania is also considered its own but I am not sure about that, but the reality is that it isn't like Oltenian and Muntenian are considerably more similar to each other than with the southeastern Transylvanian variant as to form their own group within the southern variant of Romania, so a Wallachian dialect doesn't really exist. Here are some maps to understand it better

4688:

background, and see a Jew or a 'person of colour', that's on you. Not on Bram Stoker. If Stoker had explicitly stated that Dracula represented his fear of immigrants, then it would certainly merit inclusion here. But instead we just have the baseless speculation of a few professional whiners. Hell, the real historical Vlad Dracul is admired by the European far-right today because he spent his life defending Europe from his country's Muslim neighbours.

1815:

outstretched crucifix) and Van Helsing has actually used a special putty to keep Lucy *out* of her tomb; once she is unable to embrace Arthur, she turns back to her tomb but cannot re-enter it until Van Helsing removes some of this putty. So she is not driven back ("warded") to her tomb, but rather allowed to re-enter it when it is clear that is where she wants to go. If she had wanted to go anywhere else, the men had no ability to stop her.

877: 856: 3821: 3024:

relevant information. For instance, they would see that Stoker's main occupation was not writer (he was foremost a stage manager); they would see that writing supplemented his income rather than being its primary constituent; and, sadly, they would see that Florence Stoker was left quite poor when Stoker died, forced to sell his notes for a pittance (about £200 today). I can't really get any more explicit than that without

1428: 1083: 2086:. As a non-Romani 21st Century Canadian, racism against Romani seems remote to me, but it is a reality which may have played a role in Stoker's writing. Also, the only clearly Jewish person in the book is Dracula's agent, Hildesheim, who is described in negative racial terms by Harker. I am aware of the WP rule against Original Research, so this is simply a suggestion of stuff to watch for in the scholarly literature. 227: 405: 280: 966: 1418: 3394:

reviewed well, did not make Stoker much money and did not cement his critical legacy until after his death." It's a distinction because the novel likely sold fine, but not enough to produce royalties for Stoker. Publishers, then and now, pay a flat fee, then no royalties are paid until that upfront fee is met in sales, then royalties begin. I'm happy to move this to the bottom of Reception, if you like? —

1397: 945: 664: 4137: 759: 738: 643: 452: 3719: 521: 976: 494: 5390:

else. He's plaguing Lucy, not the town (although arguably she wants his attention, so "plague" still seems a bit off). To my mind the majority of the book's narrative is Harker at the castle, then Dracula's machinations and their consequences in England, which the synopsis barely covers. It can't cover it. The best 63 word summary of Dracula in history couldn't hit all the necessary points.

769: 5029: 342: 275: 531: 3545:"Expand Adaptation. Right now it’s super bare, and should offer a broader overview of Dracula and its adaptations across a variety of popular culture. The bigger concern here is adding either a subheading for legacy—the novel's influence on horror and vampire fiction. Also, establishing what the book originated vs what its film/stage adaptations did (aesthetics and so on)." 4109: 4101: 4090: 4061: 4052: 4023: 4003: 3992: 3963: 3952: 3018:

depictions, none comment authoritatively on why the character has endured for so long. If you like, I can expand adaptations somewhat, mentioning more major adaptations and their influence, but I think beyond an extra paragraph or so, it would probably become an unnecessary strain on the article, especially given that there's a derivative article for that explicit purpose.

4867:

the Ottoman Empire, devastating the villages along the Danube.” b. Stoker has a character say, “He must, indeed, have been that Voivode Dracula who won his name against the Turk, over the great river on the very frontier of Turkey-land.” The article on the novel makes the identification of Dracula with Dracula sound like a tenuous theory rather than the obvious truth.

3561:. Adding this information now, when it can't be given proper time, will make it a trivia section, regardless of the sourcing. I don't even believe it needs its own full heading. "Adaptations" will be renamed to Legacy, constituting two subheadings (Adaptations and Influence). If this is a sticking point for you, I don't object to you failing the article now. — 611: 1572: 2214:]. From page 130 (a footnote explanation to the term's first instance): "This group of crusaders includes Van Helsing himself, Dr. John Seward, Arthur Holmwood, Quincey Morris, and later Jonathan Harker; the title Crew of Light is mine, but I have taken my cue from Stoker: Lucy, lux, light." Craft's essay has been especially influential in modern 3305: 2953: 2873: 2767: 2670: 2646: 2620: 3316: 2828: 2734: 2701: 5410:, but we have a choice as to where to put them, such as under a great big section header that says "Plot"). The reason is that you can't well-summarize a great work of this length in 63 words! As I indicated, it's not the fault of the editor who wrote this. A good synopsis just won't fit here. A lead that introduces the premise (say, 2398: 3480:

not coffins), and firmly cemented the vampire’s metamorphosis into a bat, the real impact (which we shall discuss at length momentarily) occurred, initially, with the Hamilton Deane (1924) and Hamilton Deane–John L. Balderston (1927) stage versions, then, more prominently, with the Universal (1931) and Hammer (1958) film versions.

5339:. It is absolutely reasonable to briefly recount the beginning, middle and end of a 100-year-old book. The main audience for this article is students, and they are not visiting the page to be titillated into reading. They are visiting the encyclopaedia because they do not want to read, like I was when I first visited it. — 1677:. I've trimmed it down a little again; if I change something too much let me know. It’s a little frustrating that we only mention Renfield once, but I understand that we do really have to mention him. Jiggle away if things are out of order, obviously -- it’s been a year since I last read it! Thanks again, Femme :) — 1965:, with three subheadings: psychoanalysis (sex, penetration, etc), economics (specifically capitalism), and religious (catholicism). These are the major interpretive responses to the novel. Psychoanalysis will have some overlap with the "Gender and sexuality" section of Major themes, so I'll need to be careful there. 2138:- I was a little puzzled by the "identity preservation" idea as written, since Seward's journal was dictated into a phonograph; I don't recall any indication that he even knows shorthand writing. Harker's journal entries from Castle Dracula are definitely a coping strategy though; he even says as much. 5576:

has homosexual themes or not, there is no denying that at least some academics have analyzed the text through queer lenses. And admittedly, it's not so difficult to find some homosexual subtext in scenes like Count Dracula saying that Jonathan "is tonight", or Mina being surrounded by the Brides. If

5389:

The "Harker escapes the castle ..., and the Count moves to England..." sentence is long and unwieldy, but if you're trying to condense the plot this much I can see how you get that. Also Dracula does not "plague" Whitby ... insofar as the book tells it, he begins preying on one woman there and nobody

5361:

Let's assume that as you say, it is mainly students, then what about those other few, who have a genuine love for this novel, or are curious to look into it before they read it, and the plot is given away in the introduction paragraph? C'mon. You got a good article here, but that doesn't mean this is

4905:

scholars, based on close examination of Stoker's notes and sources. Even McNally and Florescu, who popularised the idea, backed away from it in their later years because they couldn't find clear evidence. Stoker did not know essentially anything about Vlad the Impaler; there is no evidence to suggest

3603:

If you don't want to address this area until later, I can close the review, but it would be with great regret because I think the article is super close to passing! The added content would not need to be comprehensive in its detail - it could literally just be a handful of sentences expanding on what

3479:

It became the benchmark after which later vampire narratives were patterned. This development, however, was not immediately realized until the 1920s. While Stoker’s novel successfully established such vampiric tropes as tombs or “coffins” (although Dracula journeyed to England with “crates” or boxes,

3336:

RE: Success. There are sources which will mention that the novel didn't sell well. In Barbra Belford's biography, for example. Biographies must be taken with immense scepticism because many ideas popularised by Stoker's biographers later became persistent, provable falsehoods. I thought what you were

3270:

Just a quick meta point: I'm going to add some inline replies above, as I hope that will make the flow of conversation easier to follow (and you should feel free to intersperse replies within my wall of text above). But if you'd prefer I not break up your comments in this way, let me know and I'll be

3037:

is considered quite influential today, but most of what Stoker draws from is eastern European folklore. In my view, there isn't enough on the originality of the vampire Dracula to sustain an entire section on his influence to the vampire mythos. That garlic is novel, for instance, is mentioned in the

2013:

As always, my particular bailiwick is keeping an eye on the plot. I notice that someone has added a footnote about the hunters waiting outside the tomb until daylight to stake Lucy. That is not exactly right; they actually leave the cemetery and return at 1:30 pm the next day (see addition to Plot -

5146:

It has no single protagonist and opens with solicitor Jonathan Harker taking a business trip to stay at the castle of a Transylvanian nobleman, Count Dracula. Harker escapes the castle after discovering that Dracula is a vampire, and the Count moves to England and plagues the seaside town of Whitby.

4866:

The discussion under “Influences” of whether Dracula is Vlad the Impaler is silly. 1. a. Vlad the Impaler was called Dracula. b. the Count in the novel is called Dracula. This should be a clue. 2. a. Our article on Vlad says, “Vlad Dracula … 1428/31 – 1476/77… was Voivode of Wallachia”; “He invaded

4379:

Revisied the alt, but I'll say that my preference is still for the primary hook, not the alternate which I'm aware has issues. What "dracula" actually meant is irrelevant to the reason Stoker picked it. He didn't pick it because of Vlad the Impaler; he liked the meaning given in whatever book he saw

4208:

The main problem is that I can't substantiate that. Do you have any sourcing to that effect? All of the sourcing that I have reiterate what Stoker said, or simply reproduce it without comment. Don't get me wrong—I believe you! I just can't make it reflect what is accurate because that's not what the

3300:

Firstly, apologies for not replying in-line. The reason I didn't was because of the formatting. Bulleted points and bulleted points indented—I find it quite hard to follow as a reader, to discern the new from the old. So my apologies for that—a personal failing! When I've revised Adaptations, I will

3023:

Regarding how much money the novel made for Stoker, nobody knows other than that his wife was left with very little. It’s hard to get bold statements on these things for sourcing. Instead, I've included the information throughout the article so that readers can reach their own conclusions, guided by

3007:

detail his visual iconography: where the cape came from, the white shirt, the red medallion, his ever-shifting hair, all the way through to FFC's film adaptation. None concretely answer much of what you ask above because, briefly put, they aren't answerable questions. That said, I'll give you a ping

2846:

There is, in my view, a sprinkling of overlinking throughout the article. There are a couple of cases, such as "cottage industry", "parasitism", and "self-preservation", where the text is using a term in its colloquial sense, but we're linking to an article about a specialized technical sense of the

2719:

This is sort of a matter of taste, but I would be inclined to move the "Major themes" section down. Partly because the factual information in sections like "Reception" and "Textual history" feel like they're of more fundamental importance to the topic, and partly because it would be in line with the

2099:

as a theme? It seems like Harker and Renfield could be foils in that regard. Harker seems in a precarious mental state from almost the first pages of the book, and seems to be mentally stronger by the end. Renfield, on the other hand, goes from bad (committed to an asylum) to worse (attempted murder

1790:

I'm about to start proper work on this article, moving material over from my Sandbox to the article itself. Some sections are just going to look incomplete at first, and there will be obvious omissions from the page. Bear with. This process shouldn't take more than a week, and I think we will have a

4170:

The Wallachian dialect of Romanian doesn't really exist, Romanian is divided into two main groups, the northern variant (Moldavia, most of Transylvania and the northermost parts of Dobruja) and the southern variant (Wallachia, most of Dobruja and southeastern Transylvania). This southern variant is

3552:

I'm planning to make all of those chapters in late August/early September, nominate for peer review, and then go to FAC. In my view, the current article addresses all of the novel's major elements, and the lack of this information reflects upon the poor state of other articles with that scope, like

1837:

After the four vampire hunters see Lucy close-up in the graveyard, Morris, Holmwood, and Seward all return to the asylum and sleep; Van Helsing returns to his hotel. The next day, they meet Van Helsing at his hotel shortly before noon, and return to the cemetery at around 1330. See: Ch. 16, the end

1814:

The plot summary stated that "They ward back to her tomb, then stake her heart, behead her, and fill her mouth with garlic to keep Dracula from reviving her." (Ch. 16) In fact, the men held crucifixes and the Host to protect themselves from Lucy (Van Helsing leaps between Lucy and Arthur with his

1608:

Hi there. I'm planning to tackle this article as my next project. This is a very old article, and with a long history, and it’s been suffering from dust accumulation for many years now, by the looks of it. Some sections look better than others (Adaptations is surprisingly well-structured; Reception

5604:

Years ago, in the fall of 2021, I read the Knowledge (XXG) article about "Dracula", and in the section that described earlier stories that influenced Dracula, there was a link to a story about a supernatural watermill/waterwheel, which generated a mist comprised of the souls of women who had taken

4916:

Another scholar, Clive Leatherdale: "It has always been assumed Stoker knew of the foul practice of the Impaler... But when we read the novel carefully, we search in vain for any reference to the historical Dracula other than to generalised, and muddled, accounts of the Hungarian campaigns against

3641:

So I took the day off yesterday for some emotional convalescence. I've added a subheading to the last heading (now renamed Legacy) for influence and added in a smattering of information. It’s a bit sloppy but should be functional. Let me know what you think, and sorry for being moody—I know you're

3247:

So leave the Adaptations section with me for a few days. I expect I will have a revised version in place, by tomorrow evening or Saturday evening, which dovetails up with the lead extract that you presented above! If you have any follow-ups, don't hesitate to ask them. And once again, thank you so

3166:

Just to follow-up on this, I've spoken with a few others and they concur that readers might come to the article for basic information without wanting to know how the novel ends. If they do want to know how the novel ends, there's an (in my view already over-long) plot summary just a little further

3125:

To me, the summary in the intro falls squarely in this category, as it so strongly provokes the reader to wonder whether they succeeded in their attempt to kill him. I don't see an issue with the alternative wording you mentioned, except maybe on an aesthetic level, though I'm sure there are other

2568:

did Dracula (the story and characters, but particularly the title character) become such an iconic cultural property? Was the story an instant hit, and it just remained a major part of the cultural landscape from that point on? Or was there a particular adaptation that represented a turning point?

1709:

No problem at all! Your changes are terrific. I'm going to be moving off Plot now, and onto the rest of the article. I'm going to start with the novel's critical reception. I'd recommend not touching anything outside of plot, because I might end up removing it, and I don't want you to waste any of

4882:

I have just finished reading the Stoker novel and agree entirely with your point; it is quite clear from the quote above (p256 in the Penguin Classics edition, for anyone who wants to check) that Stoker identifies Dracula as Vlade Tepes. The statement in the Did You Know nomination section above,

3393:

It's already in Publication, but the source doesn't explicit mention that it didn't sell well—they say it didn't make him much money: "Charlotte Stoker, Bram's mother, gushed about the novel to the author, predicting it would bring him immense financial success; she was wrong. The novel, although

3074:

I take your point, yes. Garlic's effect on vampires was indeed an invention of Stoker's, and they found it comical that so fearful a threat would be foiled by a flavouring. Stoker likely used garlic because "rom ancient times garlic was believed to have supernatural powers" (Eighteen-Bisang &

2107:

criticism has developed along very defined pathways: gender, disease, criminology, race. I'm sure I'd be able to find someone talking about something to do with insanity, but it’s likely to go back to one of those four things. And there's significant overlap between even them—disease is linked to

4687:

the latter. It's the sort of desperate straw-grasping normally associated with the likes of Amanda Marcotte, and other outrage-starved, IDpol-baiting hacks who write for Salon, Vice and similar clickbait mills. If you look at Dracula, a pale skinned European nobleman of an explicitly Christian

3051:

It certainly suggests that the garlic trope may have been novel (which is why I used it as an example), but it could be that it was an existing trope which was simply not well known at the time, or that the particular way that Dracula's aversion to garlic manifests in the book is unintentionally

3017:

The novel's critical history is not that long. Interest in it was sudden and explosive and nobody really understands where that came from. I suspect, on a personal level, that interest similarly accrued over time, like a snowball, from media adaptations. But outside of chronologies of his visual

3002:

Hi, Colin. I've read all of your feedback. Thanks for the kind words & the suggestions. As you've noted, the adaptations section is a weakness of mine because I'm a literary critic, not a media historian. I've been so strict with the sources I've allowed on the page since I started rewriting

2523:

First off, I should note that reaching GA is, IMO, a lot more difficult for an article on a significant topic like this about which much has been written. It demands some difficult editorial decisions around what information to include and what not to include, and identifying and summarizing the

1728:

Thanks very much for the feedback and heads up! The Plot area really stood out for me, as I have been studying it carefully for the last six weeks as part of a personal project. If you ever want a detailed timeline of the entire novel, or timelines from the POV of Mina, Lucy, or Jonathan, I have

5269:

Sal is right, still bugged by the need, especially on a well written article, the need to give away the plot so blatantly in the very first paragraph. Everything on this page works, but that sentence with Van Helsing in the first paragraph isn't necessary at all. Van Helsing is mentioned in the

4954:

I was not suggesting that Stoker knew anything about Vlad the Impaler's practices, simply that in his novel Van Helsing unambiguously states "he must, indeed, have been that Voivode Dracula who won his name against the turk" - this is unambiguously a reference to Vlad Tepes. It doesn't mean the

3285:

Thanks for the quick response. Regarding the lack of high-quality RS coverage of the topics I mentioned, I have to say I'm pretty surprised (especially for certain cases, such as the contemporaneous commercial/popular success of the novel), but sure, if it's not covered we can't write about it.

3038:

reception section (derisively), but although garlic has gone on to be a well-established vampiric weakness, including that sort of thing (to me) is trivia and not really able to be supported with high-quality reliable sources. Those are what this article needs, given I'll be moving to FAC next.

3725:

It's a rare treat to come across such a well-developed article as a reviewer, because it makes my job very easy. The newly expanded "Legacy" section is great, and I'm satisfied that the few GACR-relevant issues raised above have been addressed. Congrats, and good luck on the road to FA status!

1818:

Van Helsing states that the purpose of staking Lucy, beheading her, and filling her mouth with garlic is not to prevent Dracula from reviving her, but simply to "kill her in her sleep." (Seward's journal, 27 Sept, Ch. 15). The possibility of Dracula reviving her, or any other vampire, is never

5496:

You think this will be the last time people are going to bring up "stuff like this"? There is an issue here, and I honestly thought you, of all people, with the work you put into this page, would be more receptive to this. This is why I called you out exclusively, with your interest in Gothic

5056:

Hi! I think under or at the end of the "Reception" subsection, a further update could be included that references John Edgar Browning's newest research on Dracula's review history (his prior research is cited heavily already). Browning recently co-edited, with David J. Skal, the second Norton

4883:"that although Vlad the Impaler and Elizabeth Báthory are popularly believed to have inspired Dracula, Bram Stoker's notes mention neither figure" is therefore misleading; so are the statements in the Knowledge (XXG) entry which suggest that Dracula is not identified as the historical figure. 2164:

preserving his account in shorthand, but Seward is not. It’s just the wording that threw me off: "In common with Seward and Mina, Harker decides to record events in as much detail as possible in the anxious hope the circumstantiality can counter strangeness. Keeping his journal thus becomes a

3533:

Hi, Colin. I'm familiar with these sources, and have two of these precise quotes in my notes! That said, I don't think they're necessary for GA status. I believe the article does meet the GA criteria for comprehensiveness, which is addressing major points, not "neglects no major facts". I've

4764:

All of the previous work on this article about Stoker's novel's use of competing time zones and calendars (Julian calendar, Gregorian calendar, Greenwich Mean Time, the universal day) seem to have disappeared. There's a brief mention of Franco Moretti but all of the progress scholarship has

2531:, plus a number of little nitpicks. Though I want to emphasize that none of these comments are intended to be the final word. If you disagree with any of these points (either on their substance, or their relevance to GACR), please say so. Hopefully we can talk it out and reach consensus. :) 3495:

Miller has lots of stuff about prior vampire fiction (around pg. 147), and about how it shaped subsequent depictions ("So powerful has been the impact of Stoker's novel that his prescriptions concerning the strengths and limitations of vampires have shaped common knowledge of the legendary

1637:, hi! Please try and get the length back down a bit. It’s only meant to be a summary. Not all of that needs to be included. The book isn't that long–750 words should be more than enough. The plot isn't a replacement for the plot; it is a refresher, a primer. You keep adding content when 5608:

Since then, however, the link to the story/novel has been removed from the articles for "Dracula" and "Bram Stoker", and I can't find the story within any of the articles for Gothic fiction or Gothic horror. If someone could give me the name of the story, I would really appreciate it.

1862:

around the beginning of the year, was interrupted by real-life, and has now reached a pretty major milestone: my changes have gone live! Here is a brief overview of my changes thus far; following is the steps required to get the article to a state where it could be nominated for FA.

2590:

Where does Dracula fit in with the history of the vampire myth in popular culture? Are there tropes commonly associated with vampires (e.g. aversion to garlic) which originated in the novel? Or was Stoker pulling from a tradition that was already well-established. (The mention of

2524:

highest quality sources from a broad field. So the fact that this article is already close to GA status is an impressive feat. I particularly want to call out the introduction as being a wonderfully concise and effective summary, as well as the comprehensiveness of the citations.

3167:

down. It isn't a description of the plot in the lead, really, but something to introduce readers to the novel. That is what the novel is about: the Crew of Light's attempt to kill Dracula, not simply what happens at the very end. I realise I'm being a bit stubborn on this one. —

5313:

Appreciate the support! For the record, I’m aware of Knowledge (XXG)’s official rule on this, but I think it’s a rule that shouldn’t apply to the lede. Again, this is the only article of fiction I’ve come across which does this, so people have an implicit understanding of this.

2967:

link attached to the ref seems to go to the wrong section of the text - it goes to the beginning of Chapter LVII, whereas I assume it's meant to point to Dacre's author's note at the end. You might want to update (or remove) the link, and verify that the page number is correct.

2077:

This is definitely a major upgrade and you have clearly done a ton of hard, hard work. Kudos! I'm delighted by all the new info, especially citations to Miller and Eighteen-Bisang's work. I especially liked the sections on Race and on Disease. I've been thinking about possible

1973:

and its adaptations across a variety of popular culture. The bigger concern here is adding either a subheading for legacy—the novel's influence on horror and vampire fiction. Also, establishing what the book originated vs what its film/stage adaptations did (aesthetics and so

5444:

is a nice argument to fall back on, but in this case, using one's own discretion is more sensible, especially in regards to great works of literature. Clearly people have an issue with this plot summary in the lede, and a compromise is going to have to be reached on this.

5385:

I also object to the current beginning-to-end plot summary. The current lead synopsis is not a good summary of a great work, which is not the fault of the editor who wrote the prose. What was written is about the best you can do at that length, and it's still not good.

5405:

attempt this kind of entire-plot-summary in the lead. The reason is not "don't spoil the entire work in the lead" (which, as opposed to the article, I think remains a valid editorial choice ... we don't and shouldn't withhold plot details from the article due to

2320:

Please keep up the good work-- I fear I might be giving the impression that I'm taking potshots at your work, but I am definitely a fan. I could never have done what you have, so all I can do is cheer you on and give feedback to (hopefully) improve it even more.

5181:, which means it has gone through a content review process and is considered to be one of our better-written articles. Twilight has not, so it may not be as complete as another article. But feel free to add a better summary to the lead of Twilight if you like. ♠ 3113:

to GA, and isn't mandated by the Manual of Style. There's a large section that outlines the plot, and any attempt to distil it for the lead is going to just be highly problematic—"A small group, led by Abraham van Helsing, kill him" doesn't quite work for me.

5225:

The guidance you link quite well summarises my objection: “Articles on a work of fiction should primarily describe it from a real-world perspective, discussing its reception, impact and significance.” 63 of the first 87 words of the lead are a plot overview.

2904:

Follow up: I was revising the lead a little and realised the actual reason. I must have briefly contracted brainworms when I wrote above. It says sic because Wallachian isn't a language; it’s a dialect. I could put an explanatory footnote and remove the sic?

5481:

What do you mean by "stuff like this"? We're not arguing about the rest of what you did because that was good work. I think the rest of the article is in great shape, meaning your research and labor paid off. People are just disagreeing with one small part.

3440:

we had an RS that directly claimed that the book didn't sell well, we wouldn't be able to state that fact without having to elaborate on it further. I agree that we shouldn't try to synthesize a statement like that if we only have indirect evidence from RS.

5004:

I have removed the "Dracula the Un-Dead" and "Dracul" books from the "Universe" section. They are no different then Anno Dracula or the Book of Renfield. They were not authored directly by Stoker and are already listed under the other literature section.

3693:

Hi, HSD. Pretty much everything has been addressed, just waiting for Colin to get back. It's definitely not ready for FAC yet – lots still to be done, but it's been a labour of love and I've had a lot of fun rewriting the whole thing from scratch! —

3286:

Though now my curiosity is piqued enough that I might do some sniffing around to see if I can find anything, since I was already planning on doing a brief review of secondary sources. Looking forward to seeing the updates to the Adaptations section!

2741:- I think this would just be a bit strange. Reception tends to be towards the end of articles. As discussed below, I like the current structure. I agree that there are some problems but ultimately think the same problems exist if we move them around 3589:

I do think the book's legacy is one of this topic's "main aspects". What broad coverage entails will vary from topic to topic, and won't even necessarily be the same for two books. e.g. the picture would be very different if this were a review of

2847:

word. Other cases are questionable because they're terms that readers are likely to be familiar with and which are not of central importance to the discussion. e.g. how likely is it that a reader will feel they need to check out our article on

1766:

more work than I thought :'( Any thoughts on structure would be great! I'm not entirely sure how everything should slot together yet, but that'll become more clear as I do more research and discover what's most discussed in modern criticism. —

1252: 3471:

I found a few quotes that I felt helped resolve some of the questions I raised above about the trajectory of Dracula's ascendance into the cultural canon and its place within the larger context of the vampire myth and vampire fiction.

308: 4149:

per the nominator's request, and because it has fewer points of contention. I added sources from the article since they should be included in the hook as well. QPQ is not needed since this is only the nominator's third nomination.

4360:

refers to Stoker's novel). Stoker was not an authority on Romanian, and he couldn't even speak it; he was probably just parsing the few words he could discern and spelling them the way he heard them. So the "fact" is not that

1609:

is a scattered mess). Plot will have to be trimmed, perhaps significantly. I'm just checking in to see if this page has any watchers. If you're interested to see the type of work I do, you can have a look at my last project,

4144:

has been edited, it is more accurate. The fact that Stoker was wrong does not mean about the word's meaning that it wasn't his inspiration, just that we should not make it appear like he was correct. However, I am approving

2007:

Hi again, ImaginesTigers! I just checked the article after a couple weeks and you could knock me over with a feather! I've just skimmed it lightly but it looks great to me! I hope to give it a proper reading in the next few

2599:

Not saying you need to cover every question raised above - I realize we're limited to what can actually be found in RS, but I would be surprised if there wasn't significant RS discussion of at least some of these areas.

5176:

Yes. As I've said now a couple of times, the lead is intended to be a summary of the entire article. For subjects with plots, a properly-written lead should provide a capsule summary of the entire plot. Dracula is a

4969:

As the references I presented explain, the novel is mixing up multiple Vlad Draculas. If it were Vlad Tepes, Stoker would have mentioned his cruelty; but he didn't because he only knew he liked the name "Dracula". —

1272: 5497:

literature like me. I second what Vadder said, in regards to a lead that introduces a premise being more appropriate for this page, because this lead summary as it is is poor, and lessens an otherwise good page.

5431:

Interesting thoughts, whatever is the solution, it doesn't work as it is. Never liked it, and it bugs me each time I read it. A lede that introduces the premise would more than likely be best in this case, ala

5270:

fourth paragraph anyway, so it isn't like a major aspect of the novel is ignored in the lede. The page will still work without that sentence. And it is better for us lovers of literature, who admire the work.

2887:

On the name, Stoker wrote: "Dracula in Wallachian language means devil. Wallachians were accustomed to give it as a surname to any person who rendered himself conspicuous by courage, cruel actions or cunning"

5642: 4343:

Ah yes, I now note it is based on Stoker's own quote: "Dracula means means devil." Guys, this is precisely why you should differentiate between a fact and a report of a fact -- it is easily disputable that

2659:

In the "Author" section you briefly mention that Stoker had written 18 books at the time of his death. It would be useful to know at least roughly where Dracula fits in chronologically with the rest of his

153: 2863:

requires adherence to, this should be treated as just a friendly suggestion for making the article better-than-good, rather than a requirement for a GA pass. The same goes for the quote suggestion above.

2686:

The "Influences" section feels very closely related to the later "Composition" section. I would suggest putting them closer together. No strong opinion on whether they should go before or after the plot

2595:

makes it clear that there was some precedent for vampire fiction at this point, though I would be interested to know whether it was a popular genre, or whether Dracula had the effect of popularizing it.)

5692: 625: 2780:

If you're going to keep the Daily Mail quote in "Reception", I would suggest formatting it with a plain blockquote element/template (and giving it some context within the prose). The documentation at

683:

and other media on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the

2573:

is the place where this should be laid out in detail, but I think this article should include at least a brief summary, with particular emphasis on the early history/the effect of the novel itself.

2576:

Related: How popular/commercially successful was the novel on its release? There is a lot of very good coverage of the novel's critical reception, but I can only find one sentence about its sales:

4176:. I'll move the page and do the necessary fixes some day. Sorry for so much text about unrelated stuff, but I'd just put "in old Romanian" or "in Romanian" instead of "in the Wallachian dialect". 5459:

I am retired precisely to not deal with stuff like this. Putting dozens of hours of research and labour into something and all people want to do is argue about the first paragraph... Go nuts. —

5194:

I think leads should give the premise, not the full plot. The rule you state is not universally followed in Good Articles: Citizen Kane is a Good Article and barely has a premise in its lead.

2561:

This is definitely an important aspect of the topic, and I think the body needs to give a little more detail on it. The big unanswered questions I had after reading through the article were:

1710:

your time right now. Check in here for my progress as I move through. Glad to have you here, though. The section is looking pretty good! I'll fill in the lead at the end of this process :) —

5058: 5525:

The whole idea that Dracula contains homosexual themes and that Stoker himself might've been homosexual is only based on one woman's weird projection. Please don't add this to the article.

2028:

Hi, Femme du Pays. I've just deleted the footnote—doesn't need to be there. Thanks for your assistance, and hope you learn at least a few things when you find the time to give it a read! —

5687: 4140:

The article was recently promoted to GA, checks out for copyvio and neutrality. Earwig only picked up direct quotes. The photo is public domain, looks good and is in the article. Now that

2339:

helpful, especially when Knowledge (XXG) can—in spite of the collaboration—be pretty isolated. Really glad you appreciate the article's updates, and looking forward to making it better! —

5118:

By overview, do you mean the lead - the very beginning paragraphs? That's intended to be a summary of the entire article, so it's correct for there to be a capsule summary of the plot. ♠

3003:

because the article's previous state was atrocious. That means I've been a bit baffled with what to do about adaptations. That said, there are elements I could cover. Some histories of

2941:

When Universal Studios purchased the rights to make a film version, it was discovered that Stoker had not fully complied with US copyright law, placing the novel into the public domain.

3518:

Not suggesting you need to use these particular sources/quotes, but I put them forth as tentative evidence that there is some RS discussion of some of the items I raised at the start.

1580: 620: 504: 1313: 4927:

We know exactly what book Stoker got the name "Dracula" from. It does not include details on Vlad the Impaler (you can read more on this in the article, under Textual composition).

5767: 2839:. I think the quote box is useful for when you don't have an image but do have something that might prompt the reader to read the section in question, and this one works for me. 5667: 2914:

to be used in the case of nonstandard spelling, punctuation or grammar. I'm not sure a footnote is even necessary, since it's such a subtle distinction (it's been said that "

2070:

Me again. I've read the article completely now, although it deserves more attention than I've given it so far. Here's some feedback (barring typos, which I will fix shortly).

2296:, and has never since been out of print." (emphasis mine). Sorry I missed this! I would fix it myself, but I am really afraid that I'd mess it up, based on past experience. 1127: 3538:

to include all of this in preparation for FAC (below), but I don't think it’s needed for this stage. A legacy section wasn't necessary for any of my previous literary GAs.

1338: 4292:(it has no real meaning in modern Romanian). This means that the hook, whatever it is based on, is lazy and inaccurate; so is whatever part of the article it is based on. 2436: 238: 4239:

Romanian", which probably makes the sourcing issue easier. By the way, which source would you need? One saying the Wallachian language he was talking about is Romanian?

5605:

debts out from a moneylender. The article(for the mill story) claimed that Bram Stoker had copied much of the content of the story for descriptions within "Dracula".

5412:

The book tells the story of a Transylvanian nobleman who is a vampire with a plan to relocate to England, and the people in England who chase him back to Transylvania.

3223:

Okeydoke. In the future, I'd be happy to seek a third opinion on questions like this if we're at an impasse. I've been known to be a bit stubborn at times as well.

2263:. I found the sentence "It was an immediate success," on page 158 (vs 162 in the edition you cite), but it is about the Deane & Balderston play, not the novel. 2426: 1695:

All done for now, I promise if I spot any more changes I'll wait until 18 Jan so you can work on brevity uninterrupted. Thanks so much, sorry if I stepped on toes!

5637: 4842:

I wonder if the recent trend of reading this book chronologically via the "Dracula Daily" newsletter is worth a mention? Maybe somewhere in the "Legacy" section?

4631:

Is the themes section representative of modern scholarship? Or is it just a band of select individuals who view it that way, inspired by today's trends and fads?.

2720:

mostly-chronological ordering that's already in place (since the content of the "Major themes" section seems to be largely a summary of recent academic analyses.)

147: 1988:

Right now, this is what's jumping to mind. Open to any and all feedback you might have, and I hope the article's a good read for anyone interested in reading! —

2915: 2569:

e.g. the Universal monster movies. (And have commentators connected its cultural ubiquity with its early accidental lapse into the public domain?) The article

838: 79: 5240:

So you object to having 63 words in a 322-word lead briefly summarize the plot and introduce the most significant characters? What portion would you remove? ♠

4913:: "Stoker seized on the name of Dracula, together with a vague impression of the background, and that was all". He selected the name because it meant "devil". 2204:- This was a new term to me; it is not used in the novel, and it is only used twice in the article at present. Is it a standard term within scholarly works? 1232: 5657: 5652: 3123:"Teaser"-style or incomplete plot descriptions (e.g. ending a plot description with "In the end the family makes a shocking discovery…") should not be used. 1147: 685: 5059:

https://www.academia.edu/50947406/_Draculas_Critical_Reception_Myth_and_Reality_in_Dracula_Norton_Critical_Editions_ed_John_Edgar_Browning_and_David_J_Skal

1318: 5440:. I might be over dramatizing this, but as it is now is shocking to me, and should be a rule of thumb for all great works not to follow this trend, ever. 1484: 1036: 5722: 4438:

this nomination. I'm not familiar with the DYK withdrawal procedure, so I've tagged the template for deletion. If that's improper, please let me know! —

828: 720: 601: 5762: 5747: 4245: 4182: 3804: 1474: 1026: 346: 927: 363: 5672: 5662: 5274:

lede summary is much more appropriate; a short synopsis to titillate the reader, not overemphasize the plot. I'm curious of your thoughts on this,

465: 85: 5727: 5707: 2403: 710: 803: 2987:

The only thing I have yet to do is some citation checks - I'll try to do that shortly and update this if it results in any further suggestions.

2141:

This isn't the first feedback I've got that this section is confusing, so thanks for flagging it up! I'll make this section my next priority. —

5772: 5752: 5737: 5682: 2583:

Related-related: How did the success of Dracula (on release, and within Stoker's lifetime) compare to Stoker's other writing, before and after?

2371:

I'm not trying to make a fuss. I was just wondering if the adaptations section mentions plays multiple times, if we should add a play category.

1330: 917: 591: 1910:

A themes section—a huge omission from the article's last iteration, given who tends to be reading these sorts of articles to learn (students).

256: 4932:

I am not going to litigate this here at length, but it is worth noting this belief is based on years of misinformation from popular media. —

2207:

It is indeed, but you're right—it either needs to be mentioned somewhere or cut. It was coined by Christopher Craft in his very influential '

1343: 1308: 3144:

While I understand, this section of the MOS is, in particular, about plot summaries. The lead's description of the plot is not a summary. —

1564: 1450: 1002: 5717: 5712: 5697: 5472: 5352: 4983: 4945: 4827: 4800: 4780: 4659: 4536: 4451: 4393: 4222: 3707: 3655: 3574: 3407: 3350: 3261: 3214: 3180: 3157: 3088: 2513: 2352: 2279: 2239: 2182: 2154: 2121: 2041: 1641:

and I tried to get it down. I don't want to revert at all, but try and focus on what you can cut. It’s already ballooned by 100 words... —

1152: 30: 5335:

is different -- there is no way to "spoil" it because the ambiguity is widely regarded as the point of the text. That isn't the case with

1222: 566: 564:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the

5610: 5061: 4506: 5632: 2014:

Undead Lucy above for details). Could you fix that please? I can't figure out how to edit it myself, but we both want accuracy. Later!

1930:

A section on Stoker's writing of the novel, drawing mostly from the annotated versions produced by Bierman, Eighteen-Bisang and Miller.

893: 415: 5757: 5742: 5414:) and themes, but defers the plot to the very next section where we cover everything and withhold nothing, would be better than this. 4956: 4884: 4848: 3820: 3513:

Dracula sold steadily but did not make Stoker a wealthy man Stroker wrote several more books, but none achieved the success of Dracula

3490:

Ironically, this copyright technicality can be credited with allowing the Dracula character to proliferate to all corners of the world

3248:

much for picking up this review. I thought it was going to take a very, very long time to get picked up because of how large it is. —

3107:). But I don't think the lead must contain the entire plot, or what happens at the end, for instance. That didn't come up when I took 1540: 4264:

has a rather finely sourced explanation of the name, which Vlad himself used in his signature -- in short, if probably refers to the

2431: 2166: 1365: 1350: 797: 787: 743: 244: 99: 5702: 5208:

If you are concerned about spoilers, you should know that we do not remove information on the basis that it may spoil the plot. See

4728:

I think this is more likely to become a productive discussion if you state your position plainly rather than shrouding it in irony.

5554:

That's no reason to blank the entire section. The material is well sourced, there's clearly extensive academic discourse about it.

4009: 2757:

Would be useful to know when this was written, since the section goes on to talk about it being questioned in "recent" scholarship.

104: 20: 2165:

therapeutic act of self-preservation, apparently all the more secure from Dracula's scrutiny because it is written in shorthand" (

5732: 5677: 5647: 5545: 5526: 5131:

Generally this section gives a fairly detailed premise of the book. Compare this lead with (completely random example) Twilight.

4669: 3558: 2835:

I see what you mean, but quote boxes are pretty commonly used in even Featured articles. See, for example, the recently promoted

2570: 1924: 4920:

David J Skal, who later edited the Norton Critical Edition of Dracula, wrote Stoker was inspired "only to an extent" by Vlad in

1441: 1402: 989: 950: 74: 2578:

The novel, although reviewed well, did not make Stoker much money and did not cement his critical legacy until after his death.

1520: 425: 421: 44: 4017: 1762:. It looks a little off right now, and I'll do the lead at the end, but this is going to be a long process. The article needs 1138: 1095: 671: 648: 544: 499: 474: 5402: 3045: 2549:

versions of their characters; for example, Count Dracula as the quintessential vampire, and Abraham Van Helsing as an iconic

998: 3763: 2408: 884: 861: 65: 5149:

Are you talking about these sentences, in the first paragraph? That is a perfectly reasonable capsule summary for a lead. ♠

5057:

Critical Edition of Dracula, which includes a chapter by Browning on on the novel's critical reception. See the following:

2580:

And here it's unclear to what degree this was due to low sales vs. unfavourable contract terms and/or the copyright issue.

4250: 4187: 2475: 4297:(As a side note: it is completely immaterial to the subject, as all primary sources, including Vlad's signatures, are in 1356: 1285: 5305: 5245: 5217: 5186: 5154: 5123: 3910:: This is my third DYK nomination. The article in question has just been promoted to GA following an extensive rewrite. 2801: 5541: 4520: 1881: 1759: 1208: 168: 5601:

This isn't an argument about the content of an article, but a query about what happened to a link within an article.

3986: 3126:

ways to communicate the same idea. e.g. "In the end, Dracula is killed by a small group led by Abraham Van Helsing."

2335:

Thank you! Don't worry. It doesn't come across that way at all. Knowledge (XXG) is collaborative and the feedback is

1198: 4742:

It's one of the most over-used (and misused) words in the English language, so much so that it's become a cliché. –

3895:. From Stoker's notes: "Dracula in Wallachian language means devil" (Elizabeth Miller & Robert Eighteen-Bisang). 3637:

Full disclosure: some personal issues put me in a mighty bad mood on Thursday. I think there was just a feeling of,

1920:

A heading about the narrative, with subheadings specifically devoted to style (epistolary novel) and genre (Gothic).

135: 4766: 2376: 1923:

A condensed section about adaptations, more suited to such a topic, when it already has its own dedicated article (

185: 5035: 109: 4095: 4046: 3957: 3946: 2450: 207: 5582: 5468: 5348: 4979: 4941: 4823: 4655: 4532: 4447: 4389: 4309:

suggests that, while fully intelligible to other speakers of Romanian, it had its peculiarities, as in voicing

4240: 4218: 4203: 4177: 3922: 3703: 3683: 3678:

If this is getting difficult to address, I'd love to help. The article feels nearly ready for FA status as is.

3651: 3570: 3503:

at least specifies that the initial printing was 3,000 copies (and it seems other sources repeat this figure).

3403: 3346: 3257: 3210: 3176: 3153: 3084: 2509: 2348: 2275: 2235: 2178: 2150: 2117: 2037: 1997: 1800: 1776: 1719: 1686: 1650: 1624: 4804: 4784: 1242: 480: 5614: 5065: 2557:, has been adapted for film over 30 times, and its characters continue to appear in a variety of other media. 5301: 5241: 5213: 5182: 5150: 5119: 4570: 4500: 4473: 4155: 3639:

my god, this is so much extra stuff to do, that I already planned to do later, why is he being so obstinate?

2326: 2301: 2055: 2019: 1843: 1827: 1734: 1700: 1664: 1638: 5597:

Link removed from "Dracula" article - story about supernatural watermill, mist/souls, and evil moneylender?

4776: 4013: 3496:

creature"). pg. 157 for example talks about it originating the literary association of vampires with bats.

1659:

Feel free to edit for length; I'm primarily looking for factual errors. I'm doing my best to keep it short.

5319: 5231: 5199: 5167: 5136: 5108: 4960: 4888: 4852: 2534:

My one significant concern is with the 'broad coverage' criterion. The last paragraph of the intro notes:

1877: 1536: 198: 194: 190: 3025: 129: 55: 5502: 5450: 5367: 5287: 5103:

The overview section includes an entire synopsis of the plot. Is this not what the Plot section is for?

4693: 3197: 2372: 1838:

of Seward's journal entry for 28 Sept (continued from Ch. 15) and the start of his journal for 29 Sept.

1822:

The vampire hunters prudently wait for the daytime before attempting to stake Lucy in her tomb. (Ch. 16)

1611: 1527: 1449:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1001:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

892:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

356: 226: 5441: 5407: 5297: 5209: 70: 5162:

Should leads for books and films summarise their entire plot? Many don’t, such as the example I gave.

3642:

just trying to do due diligence. I've also responded in-line to some of your comments from earlier. —

404: 279: 5530: 5328:

Not sure why you responded "Appreciate the support" - the editor offered 0 support for your position.

5315: 5227: 5195: 5163: 5132: 5104: 4673: 3836: 3784: 3780: 3592: 1583:

until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

801:, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's 380: 3049:

noted that the novel was, at times, unintentionally funny, pointing to Dracula's disdain for garlic.

1548: 1163: 248: 125: 5578: 5462: 5342: 5275: 5088: 5006: 4973: 4935: 4817: 4649: 4636: 4548: 4526: 4463: 4441: 4383: 4265: 4212: 3918: 3697: 3679: 3673: 3645: 3564: 3397: 3340: 3251: 3204: 3189:

Instead of being stubborn, I have simply made the change. That said, this didn't come up at either

3170: 3147: 3078: 2901:

Wallachian language" would read fine to me). I can remove the sic if this wasn't very clear though

2807: 2503: 2342: 2285: 2269: 2229: 2172: 2144: 2111: 2031: 1991: 1885: 1794: 1770: 1713: 1680: 1644: 1618: 1594: 1360: 1292: 1183: 341: 274: 161: 5559: 5393:

I'm struggling to find another great work lead that contains a plot summary of this type. Neither

4468:? I can close this nomination if you want, but a Dracula hook would look great on the front page. 4231:

Sorry, I got it wrong. In old Romanian, Dracul meant "dragon", "devil" is the modern meaning (see

1552: 5398: 5010: 4868: 4566: 4496: 4469: 4302: 4151: 2836: 2784: 2542: 2500:

Hi, Colin! Thank you so much for picking this up. I'm really looking forward to your feedback! —

2322: 2297: 2051: 2015: 1914: 1897: 1839: 1823: 1755: 1730: 1696: 1674: 1660: 1634: 1117: 212: 4084: 2851:

in order to understand our plot summary? Other examples: biography, solicitor, race, footnote.

4276:

mean "devil" in Romanian, old or new, Wallachian or whatever -- even if we were to assume that

175: 5563: 4845: 4733: 3731: 3609: 3523: 3446: 3368: 3291: 3276: 3271:

happy to move my replies into a separate block (though some extra quoting will be necessary).

3228: 3131: 3061: 2992: 2973: 2964: 2923: 2610:

Our plot summary in the intro shouldn't leave the reader in suspense as to how the story ends.

2490: 2469: 1531: 1187: 1179: 51: 5555: 4600:

Miller, Elizabeth (1999). "Back to the Basics: Re-Examining Stoker's Sources for "Dracula"".

3997: 2860: 2528: 2292:

is one of the most horrifying books in the English literature. It was published in May 1897,

1858:

Hi! If you've been keeping up with my progress on the Talk page, you'll know work started on

1544: 1122: 1109: 5498: 5487: 5446: 5437: 5419: 5363: 5283: 4872: 4689: 4261: 4232: 3832: 3056:). But your larger point about (lack of) RS support for this line of inquiry is well taken. 2454: 1510: 1265: 774: 373: 327: 209: 4514: 4487: 4419: 3499:

As you said, it seems there's not much info about commercial performance of the book, but

2793: 2636:

Tense feels a little weird to me. "has been situated" seems like it would be more natural.

5178: 4365:

means "devil" in Romanian, it is that Stoker thought it did. Make what you will of this.

5577:

high-quality/reliable sources talk about all this, there's no reason to not include it.

3600:

is exceptional among novels precisely because of the enormity of its cultural footprint.

1173: 5084: 4632: 4370: 4334: 4306: 4269: 2550: 1889: 1584: 1433: 1258: 1082: 981: 680: 4712:– Has his iconic status been certified by the International Iconography Commission? – 2259:- I thought I might be able to help by checking the page number in my 1972 edition of 876: 855: 5626: 4910: 4747: 4717: 3504: 2554: 2108:

race; criminology is linked to race; all are linked to gender. It’s a whole thing! —

1969:

Expand Adaptation. Right now it’s super bare, and should offer a broader overview of

1893: 536: 141: 3748:

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.

5433: 4729: 4561:! I have done a full review of the nomination (everything checks out) and approved 3727: 3632: 3605: 3519: 3442: 3364: 3287: 3272: 3224: 3127: 3057: 2988: 2969: 2919: 2856: 2486: 2465: 4172: 4136: 3041:

FWIW, I don't think the wording in the "Reception" section makes that fact clear:

3008:

when I've revised the Adaptation section, because it is very thin. If you look at

4280:

was the "devil" and not "serpent" in the language of the time, which is patently

2963:

Just a small heads-up: while verifying the citation for this, I noticed that the

5483: 5415: 4767:

https://econundead.com/excerpts/killing-time-dracula-and-social-discoordination/

3871: 3848: 1576: 676: 675:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in 561: 392: 5147:

A small group, led by Abraham Van Helsing, investigate, hunt and kill Dracula."

3754:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as

2288:, I found the quote in the 1972 edition. On p. 156, they write: "Bram Stoker's 4556: 4510: 4483: 4415: 4174: 2813: 1423: 1417: 1396: 971: 965: 944: 764: 530: 526: 520: 493: 2223: 5394: 4366: 4330: 3103:

I've made changes for a lot of your suggestions (you can see what I changed

2546: 792: 768: 758: 737: 663: 642: 409: 350: 2918:") and only peripherally related to the topic at hand, but it's up to you. 2796:(long quotes set off from the main text). However, this use is not advised 2457:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. 2208: 1516:(which had been stable since its creation in 2006) resulting in a the new 1506:

There is an ongoing discussion about the propriety of the recent split of

4743: 4713: 3118: 2218:

criticism. If you just Google "crew of light" it should turn up a lot of

1257:

Translate and keep in sync with the project versions in other languages:

2908:

Sure, I think that would be clearer. I think it's more conventional for

2755:

suggests another historical figure as an inspiration: Elizabeth Báthory.

1571: 1212: 795:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, you can visit the

4414:

it meant devil", which seems fine to me. I also prefer the first hook.

3892: 3877: 3855: 3842: 3554: 3191: 3109: 1446: 1105: 994: 781: 557: 553: 386: 24: 2634:

In the past century, Dracula is situated as a piece of Gothic fiction.

1581:

Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 3#Kretzulesco

3766:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. 2224:

Eszter Muskovits's 'The Threat of Otherness in Bram Stoker's Dracula'

2209:'Kiss Me with those Red Lips': Gender and Inversion in Bram Stoker's 1150:

all articles tagged for this project that have not been assessed for

4901:

Although it seems obvious to you, it is not supported by mainstream

4209:(relevant) sources say, so your help would be really appreciated! — 1758:. If you want to have a look at my progress so far, you can find it 4077:

Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.

3436:

Sorry, looks like I misunderstood - I thought you were saying that

1900:(these last two are responsible for a lot of the myths surrounding 610: 211: 5212:. Otherwise, it's not particularly clear what your objection is. ♠ 4318: 2485:(Still working on writing up my comments - should be ready soon.) 889: 549: 4771:

Economics of the Undead: Zombies, Vampires and the Dismal Science

4482:

Agree with BuySomeApples; would be great to get it to main page.

4765:

disappeared leaving only a few critical pieces. See for example

2897:

It just reads very stilted to me, like rough notes ("Dracula in

2848: 2545:. Many of the book's characters have entered popular culture as 1322: 2222:. Here's another article attesting to the term and its origin: 1791:

much stronger article at the end of this process. Thank you! —

5618: 5586: 5567: 5549: 5534: 5506: 5491: 5476: 5454: 5423: 5371: 5356: 5323: 5308: 5291: 5248: 5235: 5220: 5203: 5189: 5171: 5157: 5140: 5126: 5112: 5092: 5083:

Hi, could you please provide a summary for us to add? Thanks!

5069: 5023: 5014: 4987: 4964: 4949: 4892: 4876: 4856: 4831: 4808: 4788: 4751: 4737: 4721: 4697: 4677: 4663: 4640: 4574: 4540: 4491: 4477: 4455: 4423: 4397: 4374: 4338: 4255: 4226: 4192: 4159: 3926: 3788: 3735: 3711: 3687: 3659: 3613: 3578: 3527: 3484:

There are also a couple of small breadcrumbs in the foreword:

3450: 3411: 3372: 3354: 3295: 3280: 3265: 3232: 3218: 3184: 3161: 3135: 3092: 3065: 2996: 2977: 2927: 2910: 2517: 2494: 2479: 2356: 2330: 2305: 2243: 2186: 2059: 2045: 2023: 2001: 1847: 1831: 1804: 1780: 1738: 1723: 1704: 1690: 1668: 1654: 1628: 1598: 1557: 445: 213: 15: 5643:

Knowledge (XXG) Did you know articles that are good articles

5540:

I agree, this is an absurd thing to include in the article.

4799:

This major theme also seems to have disappeared altogether.

3979:

Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

1978:

Bulk out genre a bit more with some more information on how

1917:, condensed the plot summary and removed the character list. 1872:

A fully updated bibliography, with reference to the eminent

791:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to 609: 548:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to 4846:

https://www.polygon.com/23063882/dracula-daily-tumblr-memes

4352:

in that form doesn't even exist in Romanian (well, it does

2608:

A small group, led by Abraham Van Helsing, try to kill him.

408:

Facts from this article were featured on Knowledge (XXG)'s

5278:, seeing as you worked extensively on both this page, and 3604:

the last paragraph of the intro describes. But your call.

3359:

I'm not sure I understand - what's wrong with just saying

1253:

Romania-related articles from the Romanian Knowledge (XXG)

4288:

is a derivative suggesting possession or kinship by/with

1982:

draws from earlier Gothic works (and inspires later one).

1876:

scholars and theorists. In no particular order they are:

4708:

Re: "Abraham Van Helsing as an iconic vampire hunter."

3809: 3800: 3486:

Bram Stoker died in 1912, before Dracula became popular

3104: 1071: 1066: 1061: 1056: 320: 301: 5693:

Top-importance 19th century novels task force articles

160: 4070: 4032: 3972: 3932: 2541:

is regarded as one of the most significant pieces of

1575:

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect

2817:

element, for which that template provides a wrapper.

1445:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 993:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 888:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 4055:- Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith 4039:Hook has been verified by provided inline citation 174: 3117:I suppose the most relevant MoS point would be in 2683:Some comments on the order/structure of sections: 3825:Vlad III, more commonly known as Vlad the Impaler 5688:GA-Class 19th century novels task force articles 5296:We're an encyclopedia. We're not concerned with 2804:recommend formatting block quotations using the 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 5572:I second this. Regardless of whether you think 4301:, not Romanian: but there is such a thing as a 2802:Manual of Style guidelines for block quotations 5668:Knowledge (XXG) level-4 vital articles in Arts 5020:Semi-protected edit request on 8 December 2022 1786:The page is going to look bare for a few days. 254:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can 5331:I wrote it, so I am obviously happy with it. 5000:Removal of "Dracula the Un-Dead" and "Dracul" 3477: 3467:Sources/quotes for cultural impact/trajectory 3012:, you can see that it’s very much in my mind. 2916:a language is a dialect with an army and navy 2536: 8: 5768:GA-Class Ireland articles of High-importance 4773:(Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield, 2014) 4668:You are absolutely hilarious...and wrong... 4613:McNally, Raymond T.; Florescu, Radu (1973). 4565:. Can't wait to see this on the front page. 3858:; information is spread over two paragraphs. 3768:No further edits should be made to this page 1233:Postage stamps and postal history of Romania 4774: 2386: 1391: 1090:Here are some tasks awaiting attention: 1044: 939: 850: 732: 637: 488: 268: 221: 2160:Okay. I've looked back into this. Harker 4615:Dracula: A Biography of Vlad the Impaler 3839:are popularly believed to have inspired 1355:Contribute photos related to Romania at 383:are popularly believed to have inspired 4593: 2417: 2389: 1892:, Joseph S. Bierman, and (regrettably) 1393: 1314:newly contributed images (about 5800!!) 941: 852: 734: 689:to talk over new ideas and suggestions. 639: 570:to talk over new ideas and suggestions. 490: 5658:Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in Arts 5653:Knowledge (XXG) level-4 vital articles 5411: 5145: 4410:Uh, the ALT hook now says "because he 3939:Article is new enough and long enough 3512: 3489: 3485: 3360: 3122: 3042: 2940: 2886: 2791: 2750: 2633: 2607: 2577: 1331:newly created Romania-related articles 5638:Language and literature good articles 4769:in Glen Whitman and James Dow (eds), 2855:: Though I should mention that since 813:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Yorkshire 239:Language and literature good articles 7: 4917:the Turks in the fifteenth century". 4602:Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts 4348:ever meant "Devil", and in any case 4305:, and info I sourced the article on 3535: 3009: 2603:Some more low-level comments below: 1439:This article is within the scope of 987:This article is within the scope of 882:This article is within the scope of 669:This article is within the scope of 542:This article is within the scope of 451: 449: 2859:isn't one of the MoS sections that 2527:I have one non-trivial concern wrt 1459:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Ireland 1011:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Romania 479:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 5099:Plot synopsis in overview section. 695:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Horror 576:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Novels 14: 5723:Mid-importance Yorkshire articles 4235:), so there's no need to put "in 3851:'s notes mention neither figure? 3764:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Did you know 1346:, and help with some of the items 1319:Wiki Loves Monuments Romania 2011 902:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Death 247:. If you can improve it further, 50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 5763:High-importance Ireland articles 5748:High-importance Romania articles 5075: 5027: 4135: 4107: 4099: 4088: 4059: 4050: 4021: 4001: 3990: 3961: 3950: 3819: 3717: 3559:Count Dracula in popular culture 3314: 3303: 3052:funny (rather than the aversion 2951: 2871: 2826: 2765: 2732: 2699: 2668: 2644: 2618: 2571:Count Dracula in popular culture 1957:criticism, and needs to be here. 1925:Count Dracula in popular culture 1570: 1426: 1416: 1395: 1081: 974: 964: 943: 875: 854: 767: 757: 736: 662: 641: 529: 519: 492: 459: 450: 403: 395:'s notes mention neither figure? 340: 278: 273: 225: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 5673:GA-Class vital articles in Arts 5663:GA-Class level-4 vital articles 5558:not a reason to remove things. 4523:): We'll just keep it going. — 3751:Please do not modify this page. 2095:Is there anything scholarly on 1946:, as a section, is unfinished. 1579:. The discussion will occur at 1479:This article has been rated as 1174:Romania-related cleanup listing 1031:This article has been rated as 922:This article has been rated as 833:This article has been rated as 715:This article has been rated as 596:This article has been rated as 372:Did you know ... that although 5728:WikiProject Yorkshire articles 5708:Top-importance horror articles 5403:Adventures of Huckleberry Finn 4272:, wearing it. At no point did 3557:(a soon-to-be-demoted FA) and 3475:From the preface of Browning: 2792:This template can be used for 2708:— I like the current structure 1351:Awards for WikiProject Romania 816:Template:WikiProject Yorkshire 349:appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s 235:has been listed as one of the 1: 5773:All WikiProject Ireland pages 5753:All WikiProject Romania pages 5738:Mid-importance Death articles 5683:Top-importance novel articles 5633:Knowledge (XXG) good articles 5587:12:47, 6 September 2024 (UTC) 5568:12:29, 6 September 2024 (UTC) 5550:11:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC) 5249:08:59, 17 November 2023 (UTC) 5236:08:51, 17 November 2023 (UTC) 5221:01:36, 17 November 2023 (UTC) 5204:01:04, 17 November 2023 (UTC) 5190:23:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC) 5172:23:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC) 5158:22:43, 16 November 2023 (UTC) 5141:22:20, 16 November 2023 (UTC) 5127:22:07, 16 November 2023 (UTC) 5113:22:05, 16 November 2023 (UTC) 5093:00:03, 29 December 2022 (UTC) 5015:20:18, 10 November 2022 (UTC) 4950:21:58, 30 December 2023 (UTC) 4893:09:33, 30 December 2023 (UTC) 4832:12:16, 15 February 2022 (UTC) 4809:18:16, 14 February 2022 (UTC) 4789:18:13, 14 February 2022 (UTC) 4752:13:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC) 4738:00:26, 11 November 2021 (UTC) 4722:22:56, 10 November 2021 (UTC) 4698:11:08, 8 September 2022 (UTC) 4664:20:43, 16 November 2021 (UTC) 2890:Okay, I'll bite. Why the sic? 2553:. The novel, which is in the 1453:and see a list of open tasks. 1005:and see a list of open tasks. 896:and see a list of open tasks. 618:This article is supported by 42:Put new text under old text. 5070:01:34, 8 December 2022 (UTC) 4988:09:59, 10 January 2024 (UTC) 4965:03:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC) 4877:00:29, 22 October 2022 (UTC) 4641:16:09, 22 October 2021 (UTC) 3882:because he thought it meant 3501:Bram Stoker: A Literary Life 3363:? (Or some similar wording) 3010:Talk:Dracula#The Road to FAC 2266:Let me come back to this! — 1805:19:29, 20 January 2021 (UTC) 1781:03:28, 18 January 2021 (UTC) 1739:21:57, 15 January 2021 (UTC) 1724:20:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC) 1705:19:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC) 1691:17:41, 15 January 2021 (UTC) 1669:17:20, 15 January 2021 (UTC) 1655:15:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC) 1629:16:09, 13 January 2021 (UTC) 1462:Template:WikiProject Ireland 1014:Template:WikiProject Romania 5718:GA-Class Yorkshire articles 5713:WikiProject Horror articles 5698:WikiProject Novels articles 5507:21:45, 14 August 2024 (UTC) 5492:20:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC) 5477:18:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC) 5455:13:09, 14 August 2024 (UTC) 5424:16:39, 13 August 2024 (UTC) 5372:13:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC) 5357:08:35, 13 August 2024 (UTC) 5324:07:21, 13 August 2024 (UTC) 5309:01:47, 13 August 2024 (UTC) 5292:00:46, 13 August 2024 (UTC) 5050:to reactivate your request. 5038:has been answered. Set the 4862:Whether Dracula was Dracula 4604:. 10 (2 (38)): pp. 187–196. 4118: 3756:this nomination's talk page 3361:The novel didn't sell well. 1558:04:53, 1 October 2019 (UTC) 1528:Template_talk:Dracula#Split 1357:Commons:WikiProject Romania 698:Template:WikiProject Horror 579:Template:WikiProject Novels 370:The text of the entry was: 5789: 3789:07:25, 1 August 2021 (UTC) 1963:Context and interpretation 1599:21:14, 3 August 2020 (UTC) 1526:(created September 21) at 1485:project's importance scale 1190:) all over Knowledge (XXG) 1037:project's importance scale 928:project's importance scale 905:Template:WikiProject Death 839:project's importance scale 721:project's importance scale 686:general Project discussion 602:project's importance scale 567:general Project discussion 309:Featured article candidate 5758:GA-Class Ireland articles 5743:GA-Class Romania articles 5619:01:53, 20 July 2024 (UTC) 5535:19:13, 16 July 2024 (UTC) 4909:His grandson, journalist 4857:19:52, 18 July 2022 (UTC) 4678:19:14, 16 July 2024 (UTC) 4575:22:41, 27 July 2021 (UTC) 4541:08:26, 27 July 2021 (UTC) 4492:19:16, 25 July 2021 (UTC) 4478:20:01, 23 July 2021 (UTC) 4456:21:54, 16 July 2021 (UTC) 4424:19:16, 25 July 2021 (UTC) 4398:12:14, 16 July 2021 (UTC) 4375:07:28, 16 July 2021 (UTC) 4339:07:23, 16 July 2021 (UTC) 4256:07:35, 15 July 2021 (UTC) 4227:00:04, 15 July 2021 (UTC) 4193:21:52, 14 July 2021 (UTC) 4160:22:41, 27 July 2021 (UTC) 3927:16:13, 14 July 2021 (UTC) 3736:16:16, 12 July 2021 (UTC) 3712:23:57, 11 July 2021 (UTC) 3688:22:19, 11 July 2021 (UTC) 3660:21:11, 10 July 2021 (UTC) 2978:16:12, 12 July 2021 (UTC) 2943:When was this discovered? 2928:15:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC) 2812:template or the HTML < 2357:12:43, 22 June 2021 (UTC) 2331:02:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC) 2306:01:12, 27 June 2021 (UTC) 2244:12:43, 22 June 2021 (UTC) 2187:20:27, 22 June 2021 (UTC) 2060:20:56, 19 June 2021 (UTC) 2050:That works! :) In haste, 2046:18:19, 19 June 2021 (UTC) 2024:18:09, 19 June 2021 (UTC) 2002:19:54, 13 June 2021 (UTC) 1848:18:16, 19 June 2021 (UTC) 1502:Template split discussion 1478: 1411: 1323:WLM Romania external site 1043: 1030: 959: 921: 870: 832: 752: 714: 657: 617: 595: 514: 487: 432: 402: 337: 271: 267: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 5703:GA-Class horror articles 3614:01:14, 9 July 2021 (UTC) 3579:00:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC) 3528:00:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC) 3451:22:51, 8 July 2021 (UTC) 3412:22:34, 8 July 2021 (UTC) 3373:22:13, 8 July 2021 (UTC) 3355:21:27, 8 July 2021 (UTC) 3296:20:59, 8 July 2021 (UTC) 3281:20:40, 8 July 2021 (UTC) 3266:20:12, 8 July 2021 (UTC) 3233:22:10, 8 July 2021 (UTC) 3219:21:43, 8 July 2021 (UTC) 3185:21:33, 8 July 2021 (UTC) 3162:21:27, 8 July 2021 (UTC) 3136:20:44, 8 July 2021 (UTC) 3093:21:27, 8 July 2021 (UTC) 3066:20:51, 8 July 2021 (UTC) 2997:16:27, 8 July 2021 (UTC) 2518:15:23, 8 July 2021 (UTC) 2495:14:54, 8 July 2021 (UTC) 2480:14:54, 8 July 2021 (UTC) 2294:was an immediate success 1832:20:46, 29 May 2021 (UTC) 1819:mentioned in the novel. 1565:Redirects for discussion 1563:"Kretzulesco" listed at 1339:needing expert attention 1291:* Add more reference to 5733:GA-Class Death articles 5678:GA-Class novel articles 5648:GA-Class vital articles 3893:Dracula#Textual history 3760:the article's talk page 3741:Did you know nomination 1186:" (Bessarabian part of 1130:or create a missing one 785:is within the scope of 621:19th century task force 5542:DavidMalcolm1212112221 3482: 2559: 1938:What needs to be done: 1878:Robert Eighteen-Bisang 1521:Adaptations of Dracula 1361:Romania related images 1178:Normalize the use of " 614: 347:fact from this article 75:avoid personal attacks 5333:The Turn of the Screw 5272:The Turn of The Screw 4262:Vlad the Impaler#Name 4233:Vlad the Impaler#Name 3925:). Self-nominated at 3198:The Turn of the Screw 3043:The British magazine 2100:of Seward, for one). 2080:racism against Romani 1612:The Turn of the Screw 1363:on Commons. See also 1182:" (capitalized) and " 788:WikiProject Yorkshire 613: 473:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 466:level-4 vital article 245:good article criteria 100:Neutral point of view 4010:copyright violations 3593:The Sorrows of Satan 2261:In Search of Dracula 328:Good article nominee 105:No original research 4646:It’s the former. — 4268:and to his father, 4266:Order of the Dragon 4204:Super Dromaeosaurus 3301:reply in-line with 2753:Dracula Was A Woman 1950:is a major part of 1886:John Edgar Browning 1442:WikiProject Ireland 1366:media-related tasks 1336:Check the articles 1184:Northern Bessarabia 990:WikiProject Romania 5399:Great Expectations 4303:Wallachian dialect 4018:close paraphrasing 3856:Dracula#Influences 3831:... that although 3075:Miller, p. 73). — 3033:Lastly, vampires. 3028:becoming an issue. 2837:Sonic the Hedgehog 2751:Raymond McNally's 2543:English literature 2379:)MagicatthemovieS 1898:Raymond T. McNally 1810:Plot - Undead Lucy 1128:Request an article 1118:History of Romania 819:Yorkshire articles 672:WikiProject Horror 615: 545:WikiProject Novels 475:content assessment 284:Article milestones 86:dispute resolution 47: 5280:Turn of The Screw 5081:Not done for now: 5054: 5053: 4814:It'll be back! — 4791: 4779:comment added by 4129: 4128: 4117: 4116: 4069: 4068: 4031: 4030: 3987:Adequate sourcing 3971: 3970: 3930: 3896: 3863: 3859: 3837:Elizabeth Báthory 3536:outlined my plans 2445: 2444: 2136:Narrative section 1556: 1499: 1498: 1495: 1494: 1491: 1490: 1390: 1389: 1386: 1385: 1382: 1381: 1378: 1377: 1188:Chernivtsi Oblast 1180:Northern Bukovina 938: 937: 934: 933: 885:WikiProject Death 849: 848: 845: 844: 731: 730: 727: 726: 636: 635: 632: 631: 444: 443: 440: 439: 381:Elizabeth Báthory 263: 220: 219: 66:Assume good faith 43: 5780: 5438:The Great Gatsby 5079: 5078: 5045: 5041: 5031: 5030: 5024: 4922:Hollywood Gothic 4618: 4611: 4605: 4598: 4560: 4552: 4467: 4253: 4248: 4243: 4207: 4190: 4185: 4180: 4139: 4119: 4111: 4110: 4106:Clear at 100px: 4103: 4102: 4092: 4091: 4071: 4063: 4062: 4054: 4053: 4033: 4025: 4024: 4005: 4004: 3994: 3993: 3973: 3965: 3964: 3954: 3953: 3933: 3916: 3890: 3888: 3874:picked the name 3861: 3853: 3833:Vlad the Impaler 3823: 3775:The result was: 3753: 3721: 3720: 3677: 3636: 3509:Hollywood Gothic 3323:to each comment. 3322: 3318: 3317: 3311: 3307: 3306: 2959: 2955: 2954: 2879: 2875: 2874: 2834: 2830: 2829: 2811: 2794:block quotations 2789: 2783: 2773: 2769: 2768: 2740: 2736: 2735: 2707: 2703: 2702: 2676: 2672: 2671: 2652: 2648: 2647: 2626: 2622: 2621: 2455:Talk:Dracula/GA1 2399:Copyvio detector 2387: 2373:MagicatthemovieS 2103:No, not really. 1956: 1906: 1882:Elizabeth Miller 1591: 1574: 1534: 1525: 1519: 1515: 1509: 1467: 1466: 1465:Ireland articles 1463: 1460: 1457: 1436: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1420: 1413: 1412: 1407: 1399: 1392: 1293:FC CFR Timișoara 1277: 1270: 1263: 1209:project articles 1096:Article requests 1085: 1078: 1077: 1045: 1019: 1018: 1017:Romania articles 1015: 1012: 1009: 984: 979: 978: 977: 968: 961: 960: 955: 947: 940: 910: 909: 906: 903: 900: 879: 872: 871: 866: 858: 851: 821: 820: 817: 814: 811: 777: 775:Yorkshire portal 772: 771: 761: 754: 753: 748: 740: 733: 703: 702: 699: 696: 693: 666: 659: 658: 653: 645: 638: 584: 583: 580: 577: 574: 539: 534: 533: 523: 516: 515: 510: 507: 496: 489: 472: 463: 462: 455: 454: 453: 446: 433:Current status: 407: 374:Vlad the Impaler 344: 323: 304: 283: 282: 277: 269: 252: 229: 222: 214: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 5788: 5787: 5783: 5782: 5781: 5779: 5778: 5777: 5623: 5622: 5599: 5523: 5101: 5076: 5043: 5039: 5028: 5022: 5002: 4864: 4840: 4797: 4762: 4706: 4629: 4624: 4623: 4622: 4621: 4612: 4608: 4599: 4595: 4554: 4546: 4461: 4251: 4246: 4241: 4201: 4188: 4183: 4178: 4108: 4100: 4096:Used in article 4089: 4085:Freely licensed 4060: 4051: 4022: 4002: 3991: 3962: 3951: 3886: 3828: 3827: 3826: 3816: 3814: 3810:Article history 3749: 3743: 3718: 3671: 3630: 3469: 3315: 3313: 3304: 3302: 2952: 2950: 2872: 2870: 2827: 2825: 2805: 2787: 2781: 2766: 2764: 2733: 2731: 2700: 2698: 2669: 2667: 2645: 2643: 2619: 2617: 2449:This review is 2441: 2413: 2385: 2369: 2202:"Crew of Light" 1954: 1904: 1890:Allison Milbank 1868:What I've done: 1856: 1854:The Road to FAC 1812: 1788: 1606: 1585: 1568: 1523: 1517: 1513: 1507: 1504: 1481:High-importance 1464: 1461: 1458: 1455: 1454: 1432: 1427: 1425: 1406:High‑importance 1405: 1374: 1371: 1280: 1275: 1268: 1266:Proiect:România 1261: 1259:Projet:Roumanie 1237: 1217: 1193: 1158: 1133: 1108:reach at least 1076: 1033:High-importance 1016: 1013: 1010: 1007: 1006: 980: 975: 973: 954:High‑importance 953: 907: 904: 901: 898: 897: 864: 818: 815: 812: 809: 808: 773: 766: 746: 701:horror articles 700: 697: 694: 691: 690: 651: 581: 578: 575: 572: 571: 535: 528: 508: 502: 470: 460: 398: 397: 368: 319: 300: 272: 216: 215: 210: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 5786: 5784: 5776: 5775: 5770: 5765: 5760: 5755: 5750: 5745: 5740: 5735: 5730: 5725: 5720: 5715: 5710: 5705: 5700: 5695: 5690: 5685: 5680: 5675: 5670: 5665: 5660: 5655: 5650: 5645: 5640: 5635: 5625: 5624: 5598: 5595: 5594: 5593: 5592: 5591: 5590: 5589: 5579:PanagiotisZois 5522: 5519: 5518: 5517: 5516: 5515: 5514: 5513: 5512: 5511: 5510: 5509: 5463:ImaginesTigers 5383: 5382: 5381: 5380: 5379: 5378: 5377: 5376: 5375: 5374: 5343:ImaginesTigers 5329: 5276:ImaginesTigers 5267: 5266: 5265: 5264: 5263: 5262: 5261: 5260: 5259: 5258: 5257: 5256: 5255: 5254: 5253: 5252: 5251: 5100: 5097: 5096: 5095: 5052: 5051: 5032: 5021: 5018: 5001: 4998: 4997: 4996: 4995: 4994: 4993: 4992: 4991: 4990: 4974:ImaginesTigers 4936:ImaginesTigers 4930: 4929: 4928: 4925: 4918: 4914: 4896: 4895: 4863: 4860: 4839: 4836: 4835: 4834: 4818:ImaginesTigers 4801:130.157.157.12 4796: 4793: 4781:130.157.157.12 4761: 4758: 4757: 4756: 4755: 4754: 4725: 4724: 4705: 4702: 4701: 4700: 4682: 4681: 4680: 4650:ImaginesTigers 4628: 4627:Themes section 4625: 4620: 4619: 4606: 4592: 4591: 4587: 4586: 4585: 4584: 4583: 4582: 4581: 4580: 4579: 4578: 4577: 4549:ImaginesTigers 4527:ImaginesTigers 4464:ImaginesTigers 4442:ImaginesTigers 4429: 4428: 4427: 4426: 4408: 4407: 4406: 4405: 4404: 4403: 4402: 4401: 4400: 4384:ImaginesTigers 4341: 4307:Alecu Beldiman 4294: 4293: 4270:Vlad II Dracul 4213:ImaginesTigers 4196: 4195: 4127: 4126: 4115: 4114: 4113: 4112: 4104: 4093: 4079: 4078: 4067: 4066: 4065: 4064: 4056: 4041: 4040: 4029: 4028: 4027: 4026: 4006: 3995: 3981: 3980: 3969: 3968: 3967: 3966: 3955: 3941: 3940: 3919:ImaginesTigers 3914: 3913: 3912: 3911: 3905: 3900: 3899: 3898: 3897: 3824: 3818: 3817: 3813: 3812: 3807: 3797: 3795: 3791: 3773: 3772: 3744: 3742: 3739: 3715: 3714: 3698:ImaginesTigers 3680:Horsesizedduck 3674:ImaginesTigers 3669: 3668: 3667: 3666: 3665: 3664: 3663: 3662: 3646:ImaginesTigers 3621: 3620: 3619: 3618: 3617: 3616: 3601: 3582: 3581: 3565:ImaginesTigers 3549: 3548: 3547: 3546: 3540: 3539: 3468: 3465: 3464: 3463: 3462: 3461: 3460: 3459: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3423: 3422: 3421: 3420: 3419: 3418: 3417: 3416: 3415: 3414: 3398:ImaginesTigers 3382: 3381: 3380: 3379: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3375: 3341:ImaginesTigers 3329: 3328: 3327: 3326: 3325: 3324: 3283: 3252:ImaginesTigers 3244: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3239: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3205:ImaginesTigers 3171:ImaginesTigers 3164: 3148:ImaginesTigers 3139: 3138: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3095: 3079:ImaginesTigers 3069: 3068: 3030: 3029: 3020: 3019: 3014: 3013: 2985: 2984: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2945: 2944: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2892: 2891: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2865: 2864: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2820: 2819: 2799: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2759: 2758: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2680: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2662: 2661: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2638: 2637: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2612: 2611: 2597: 2596: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2551:vampire hunter 2521: 2520: 2504:ImaginesTigers 2484: 2460: 2459: 2443: 2442: 2440: 2439: 2434: 2429: 2423: 2420: 2419: 2415: 2414: 2412: 2411: 2409:External links 2406: 2401: 2395: 2392: 2391: 2384: 2381: 2368: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2343:ImaginesTigers 2315: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2286:ImaginesTigers 2270:ImaginesTigers 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2230:ImaginesTigers 2196: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2173:ImaginesTigers 2145:ImaginesTigers 2130: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2112:ImaginesTigers 2097:mental illness 2090: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2072: 2071: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2032:ImaginesTigers 2010: 2009: 1992:ImaginesTigers 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1976: 1966: 1961:A heading for 1959: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1928: 1921: 1918: 1911: 1908: 1855: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1811: 1808: 1795:ImaginesTigers 1787: 1784: 1771:ImaginesTigers 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1714:ImaginesTigers 1681:ImaginesTigers 1673:Thanks a lot, 1645:ImaginesTigers 1619:ImaginesTigers 1605: 1602: 1567: 1561: 1503: 1500: 1497: 1496: 1493: 1492: 1489: 1488: 1477: 1471: 1470: 1468: 1451:the discussion 1438: 1437: 1434:Ireland portal 1421: 1409: 1408: 1400: 1388: 1387: 1384: 1383: 1380: 1379: 1376: 1375: 1373: 1372: 1370: 1369: 1353: 1347: 1334: 1326: 1304: 1296: 1281: 1279: 1278: 1273:Проект:Румыния 1255: 1248: 1238: 1236: 1235: 1228: 1218: 1216: 1215: 1204: 1199:Disambiguation 1194: 1192: 1191: 1176: 1169: 1159: 1157: 1156: 1144: 1134: 1132: 1131: 1125: 1113: 1101: 1089: 1087: 1086: 1075: 1074: 1069: 1064: 1059: 1053: 1050: 1049: 1041: 1040: 1029: 1023: 1022: 1020: 1003:the discussion 999:related topics 986: 985: 982:Romania portal 969: 957: 956: 948: 936: 935: 932: 931: 924:Mid-importance 920: 914: 913: 911: 908:Death articles 894:the discussion 880: 868: 867: 865:Mid‑importance 859: 847: 846: 843: 842: 835:Mid-importance 831: 825: 824: 822: 779: 778: 762: 750: 749: 747:Mid‑importance 741: 729: 728: 725: 724: 717:Top-importance 713: 707: 706: 704: 667: 655: 654: 652:Top‑importance 646: 634: 633: 630: 629: 626:Top-importance 616: 606: 605: 598:Top-importance 594: 588: 587: 585: 582:novel articles 541: 540: 524: 512: 511: 509:Top‑importance 497: 485: 484: 478: 456: 442: 441: 438: 437: 430: 429: 416:On this day... 400: 399: 369: 364:August 4, 2021 339: 338: 335: 334: 331: 324: 316: 315: 312: 305: 297: 296: 293: 290: 286: 285: 265: 264: 230: 218: 217: 208: 206: 205: 202: 201: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5785: 5774: 5771: 5769: 5766: 5764: 5761: 5759: 5756: 5754: 5751: 5749: 5746: 5744: 5741: 5739: 5736: 5734: 5731: 5729: 5726: 5724: 5721: 5719: 5716: 5714: 5711: 5709: 5706: 5704: 5701: 5699: 5696: 5694: 5691: 5689: 5686: 5684: 5681: 5679: 5676: 5674: 5671: 5669: 5666: 5664: 5661: 5659: 5656: 5654: 5651: 5649: 5646: 5644: 5641: 5639: 5636: 5634: 5631: 5630: 5628: 5621: 5620: 5616: 5612: 5611:108.24.166.59 5606: 5602: 5596: 5588: 5584: 5580: 5575: 5571: 5570: 5569: 5565: 5561: 5557: 5553: 5552: 5551: 5547: 5543: 5539: 5538: 5537: 5536: 5532: 5528: 5521:Homosexuality 5520: 5508: 5504: 5500: 5495: 5494: 5493: 5489: 5485: 5480: 5479: 5478: 5474: 5470: 5466: 5465: 5464: 5458: 5457: 5456: 5452: 5448: 5443: 5439: 5435: 5430: 5429: 5428: 5427: 5426: 5425: 5421: 5417: 5413: 5409: 5404: 5400: 5396: 5391: 5387: 5373: 5369: 5365: 5360: 5359: 5358: 5354: 5350: 5346: 5345: 5344: 5338: 5334: 5330: 5327: 5326: 5325: 5321: 5317: 5312: 5311: 5310: 5307: 5303: 5299: 5295: 5294: 5293: 5289: 5285: 5281: 5277: 5273: 5268: 5250: 5247: 5243: 5239: 5238: 5237: 5233: 5229: 5224: 5223: 5222: 5219: 5215: 5211: 5207: 5206: 5205: 5201: 5197: 5193: 5192: 5191: 5188: 5184: 5180: 5175: 5174: 5173: 5169: 5165: 5161: 5160: 5159: 5156: 5152: 5148: 5144: 5143: 5142: 5138: 5134: 5130: 5129: 5128: 5125: 5121: 5117: 5116: 5115: 5114: 5110: 5106: 5098: 5094: 5090: 5086: 5082: 5074: 5073: 5072: 5071: 5067: 5063: 5062:76.105.100.87 5060: 5049: 5046:parameter to 5037: 5033: 5026: 5025: 5019: 5017: 5016: 5012: 5008: 4999: 4989: 4985: 4981: 4977: 4976: 4975: 4968: 4967: 4966: 4962: 4958: 4953: 4952: 4951: 4947: 4943: 4939: 4938: 4937: 4931: 4926: 4923: 4919: 4915: 4912: 4911:Daniel Farson 4908: 4907: 4904: 4900: 4899: 4898: 4897: 4894: 4890: 4886: 4881: 4880: 4879: 4878: 4874: 4870: 4861: 4859: 4858: 4854: 4850: 4847: 4843: 4838:Dracula Daily 4837: 4833: 4829: 4825: 4821: 4820: 4819: 4813: 4812: 4811: 4810: 4806: 4802: 4794: 4792: 4790: 4786: 4782: 4778: 4772: 4768: 4760:Standard Time 4759: 4753: 4749: 4745: 4741: 4740: 4739: 4735: 4731: 4727: 4726: 4723: 4719: 4715: 4711: 4710: 4709: 4703: 4699: 4695: 4691: 4686: 4683: 4679: 4675: 4671: 4667: 4666: 4665: 4661: 4657: 4653: 4652: 4651: 4645: 4644: 4643: 4642: 4638: 4634: 4626: 4616: 4610: 4607: 4603: 4597: 4594: 4590: 4576: 4572: 4568: 4567:BuySomeApples 4564: 4558: 4550: 4544: 4543: 4542: 4538: 4534: 4530: 4529: 4528: 4522: 4519: 4516: 4512: 4508: 4505: 4502: 4498: 4497:BuySomeApples 4495: 4494: 4493: 4489: 4485: 4481: 4480: 4479: 4475: 4471: 4470:BuySomeApples 4465: 4460:Are you sure 4459: 4458: 4457: 4453: 4449: 4445: 4444: 4443: 4437: 4436: 4431: 4430: 4425: 4421: 4417: 4413: 4409: 4399: 4395: 4391: 4387: 4386: 4385: 4378: 4377: 4376: 4372: 4368: 4364: 4359: 4355: 4351: 4347: 4342: 4340: 4336: 4332: 4328: 4324: 4320: 4316: 4312: 4308: 4304: 4300: 4296: 4295: 4291: 4287: 4283: 4279: 4275: 4271: 4267: 4263: 4259: 4258: 4257: 4254: 4249: 4244: 4238: 4234: 4230: 4229: 4228: 4224: 4220: 4216: 4215: 4214: 4205: 4200: 4199: 4198: 4197: 4194: 4191: 4186: 4181: 4175: 4173: 4169: 4166: 4165: 4164: 4163: 4162: 4161: 4157: 4153: 4152:BuySomeApples 4148: 4143: 4138: 4133: 4124: 4121: 4120: 4105: 4097: 4094: 4086: 4083: 4082: 4081: 4080: 4076: 4073: 4072: 4058:Interesting: 4057: 4048: 4045: 4044: 4043: 4042: 4038: 4035: 4034: 4019: 4015: 4011: 4007: 3999: 3996: 3988: 3985: 3984: 3983: 3982: 3978: 3975: 3974: 3959: 3956: 3948: 3945: 3944: 3943: 3942: 3938: 3935: 3934: 3931: 3928: 3924: 3920: 3909: 3906: 3904: 3903: 3902: 3901: 3894: 3889: 3885: 3881: 3880: 3879: 3873: 3869: 3865: 3864: 3860: 3857: 3850: 3846: 3845: 3844: 3838: 3834: 3830: 3829: 3822: 3811: 3808: 3806: 3802: 3799: 3798: 3794: 3792: 3790: 3786: 3782: 3778: 3771: 3769: 3765: 3761: 3757: 3752: 3746: 3745: 3740: 3738: 3737: 3733: 3729: 3724: 3713: 3709: 3705: 3701: 3700: 3699: 3692: 3691: 3690: 3689: 3685: 3681: 3675: 3661: 3657: 3653: 3649: 3648: 3647: 3640: 3634: 3629: 3628: 3627: 3626: 3625: 3624: 3623: 3622: 3615: 3611: 3607: 3602: 3599: 3595: 3594: 3588: 3587: 3586: 3585: 3584: 3583: 3580: 3576: 3572: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3560: 3556: 3551: 3550: 3544: 3543: 3542: 3541: 3537: 3532: 3531: 3530: 3529: 3525: 3521: 3516: 3514: 3510: 3506: 3505:David J. Skal 3502: 3497: 3493: 3491: 3487: 3481: 3476: 3473: 3466: 3452: 3448: 3444: 3439: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3432: 3431: 3430: 3429: 3428: 3427: 3426: 3425: 3424: 3413: 3409: 3405: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3392: 3391: 3390: 3389: 3388: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3374: 3370: 3366: 3362: 3358: 3357: 3356: 3352: 3348: 3344: 3343: 3342: 3335: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3331: 3330: 3321: 3310: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3293: 3289: 3284: 3282: 3278: 3274: 3269: 3268: 3267: 3263: 3259: 3255: 3254: 3253: 3246: 3245: 3234: 3230: 3226: 3222: 3221: 3220: 3216: 3212: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3200: 3199: 3194: 3193: 3188: 3187: 3186: 3182: 3178: 3174: 3173: 3172: 3165: 3163: 3159: 3155: 3151: 3150: 3149: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3137: 3133: 3129: 3124: 3120: 3116: 3115: 3112: 3111: 3106: 3102: 3101: 3094: 3090: 3086: 3082: 3081: 3080: 3073: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3067: 3063: 3059: 3055: 3050: 3048: 3047: 3040: 3039: 3036: 3032: 3031: 3027: 3022: 3021: 3016: 3015: 3011: 3006: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2994: 2990: 2979: 2975: 2971: 2966: 2962: 2961: 2958: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2942: 2939: 2938: 2929: 2925: 2921: 2917: 2913: 2912: 2907: 2906: 2903: 2902: 2900: 2896: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2889: 2885: 2884: 2878: 2869: 2868: 2867: 2866: 2862: 2858: 2854: 2850: 2845: 2844: 2838: 2833: 2824: 2823: 2822: 2821: 2818: 2815: 2809: 2803: 2797: 2795: 2786: 2779: 2778: 2772: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2756: 2754: 2749: 2748: 2739: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2706: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2685: 2684: 2682: 2681: 2675: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2660:bibliography. 2658: 2657: 2651: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2639: 2635: 2632: 2631: 2625: 2616: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2609: 2606: 2605: 2604: 2601: 2594: 2589: 2582: 2581: 2579: 2575: 2574: 2572: 2567: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2558: 2556: 2555:public domain 2552: 2548: 2544: 2540: 2535: 2532: 2530: 2525: 2519: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2482: 2481: 2477: 2474: 2471: 2467: 2464: 2458: 2456: 2452: 2447: 2446: 2438: 2435: 2433: 2430: 2428: 2425: 2424: 2422: 2421: 2416: 2410: 2407: 2405: 2402: 2400: 2397: 2396: 2394: 2393: 2388: 2382: 2380: 2378: 2374: 2366: 2358: 2354: 2350: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2338: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2328: 2324: 2323:Femme du Pays 2319: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2307: 2303: 2299: 2298:Femme du Pays 2295: 2291: 2287: 2284: 2283: 2281: 2277: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2265: 2264: 2262: 2258: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2212: 2206: 2205: 2203: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2188: 2184: 2180: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2168: 2163: 2159: 2158: 2156: 2152: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2140: 2139: 2137: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2123: 2119: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2106: 2102: 2101: 2098: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2085: 2081: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2069: 2068: 2061: 2057: 2053: 2052:Femme du Pays 2049: 2048: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2021: 2017: 2016:Femme du Pays 2012: 2011: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1981: 1977: 1975: 1972: 1967: 1964: 1960: 1958: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1936: 1935: 1929: 1926: 1922: 1919: 1916: 1915:Femme du Pays 1912: 1909: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1894:Radu Florescu 1891: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1875: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1861: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1841: 1840:Femme du Pays 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1824:Femme du Pays 1820: 1816: 1809: 1807: 1806: 1802: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1785: 1783: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1765: 1761: 1760:on my Sandbox 1757: 1756:Femme du Pays 1740: 1736: 1732: 1731:Femme du Pays 1727: 1726: 1725: 1721: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1697:Femme du Pays 1694: 1693: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1676: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1661:Femme du Pays 1658: 1657: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1640: 1636: 1635:Femme du Pays 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1614: 1613: 1604:Any watchers? 1603: 1601: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1590: 1589: 1582: 1578: 1573: 1566: 1562: 1560: 1559: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1533: 1529: 1522: 1512: 1501: 1486: 1482: 1476: 1473: 1472: 1469: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1443: 1435: 1424: 1422: 1419: 1415: 1414: 1410: 1404: 1401: 1398: 1394: 1368: 1367: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1352: 1348: 1345: 1341: 1340: 1335: 1333: 1332: 1327: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1315: 1310: 1306: 1305: 1303: 1301: 1297: 1294: 1290: 1288: 1287: 1282: 1274: 1269:(in Romanian) 1267: 1260: 1256: 1254: 1250: 1249: 1247: 1245: 1244: 1239: 1234: 1230: 1229: 1227: 1225: 1224: 1219: 1214: 1210: 1207:Disambiguate 1206: 1205: 1203: 1201: 1200: 1195: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1175: 1171: 1170: 1168: 1166: 1165: 1160: 1155: 1154: 1149: 1146: 1145: 1143: 1141: 1140: 1135: 1129: 1126: 1124: 1120: 1119: 1114: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1102: 1100: 1098: 1097: 1092: 1091: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1079: 1073: 1070: 1068: 1065: 1063: 1060: 1058: 1055: 1054: 1052: 1051: 1047: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1028: 1025: 1024: 1021: 1004: 1000: 996: 992: 991: 983: 972: 970: 967: 963: 962: 958: 952: 949: 946: 942: 929: 925: 919: 916: 915: 912: 895: 891: 887: 886: 881: 878: 874: 873: 869: 863: 860: 857: 853: 840: 836: 830: 827: 826: 823: 806: 805: 800: 799: 794: 790: 789: 784: 783: 776: 770: 765: 763: 760: 756: 755: 751: 745: 742: 739: 735: 722: 718: 712: 709: 708: 705: 688: 687: 682: 678: 674: 673: 668: 665: 661: 660: 656: 650: 647: 644: 640: 627: 624:(assessed as 623: 622: 612: 608: 607: 603: 599: 593: 590: 589: 586: 569: 568: 563: 562:short stories 559: 555: 551: 547: 546: 538: 537:Novels portal 532: 527: 525: 522: 518: 517: 513: 506: 501: 498: 495: 491: 486: 482: 476: 468: 467: 457: 448: 447: 436: 431: 427: 423: 419: 417: 411: 406: 401: 396: 394: 389: 388: 384: 382: 376: 375: 366: 365: 360: 358: 357:Did you know? 352: 348: 343: 336: 332: 330: 329: 325: 322: 321:July 12, 2021 318: 317: 313: 311: 310: 306: 303: 302:June 30, 2004 299: 298: 294: 291: 288: 287: 281: 276: 270: 266: 261: 259: 258: 250: 246: 242: 241: 240: 234: 231: 228: 224: 223: 204: 203: 200: 196: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 5607: 5603: 5600: 5573: 5524: 5461: 5460: 5434:Frankenstein 5392: 5388: 5384: 5341: 5340: 5336: 5332: 5279: 5271: 5179:Good Article 5102: 5080: 5055: 5047: 5036:edit request 5003: 4972: 4971: 4957:59.102.48.90 4934: 4933: 4921: 4902: 4885:59.102.48.90 4865: 4849:159.153.90.1 4844: 4841: 4816: 4815: 4798: 4775:— Preceding 4770: 4763: 4707: 4684: 4648: 4647: 4630: 4614: 4609: 4601: 4596: 4588: 4562: 4525: 4524: 4517: 4503: 4440: 4439: 4435:Withdrawing' 4434: 4433: 4411: 4382: 4381: 4362: 4357: 4353: 4349: 4345: 4326: 4322: 4317:, therefore 4314: 4310: 4298: 4289: 4285: 4281: 4277: 4273: 4236: 4211: 4210: 4167: 4146: 4141: 4131: 4130: 4122: 4074: 4036: 3976: 3936: 3915: 3907: 3891:Source: See 3883: 3876: 3875: 3867: 3866: 3854:Source: See 3852: 3841: 3840: 3793: 3776: 3774: 3767: 3759: 3755: 3750: 3747: 3722: 3716: 3696: 3695: 3670: 3644: 3643: 3638: 3597: 3591: 3563: 3562: 3517: 3508: 3500: 3498: 3494: 3483: 3478: 3474: 3470: 3437: 3396: 3395: 3339: 3338: 3319: 3308: 3250: 3249: 3203: 3202: 3196: 3190: 3169: 3168: 3146: 3145: 3108: 3077: 3076: 3053: 3044: 3034: 3004: 2986: 2965:Google Books 2956: 2909: 2898: 2876: 2857:MOS:OVERLINK 2852: 2831: 2770: 2752: 2737: 2704: 2673: 2649: 2623: 2602: 2598: 2592: 2565: 2560: 2538: 2537: 2533: 2526: 2522: 2502: 2501: 2483: 2472: 2462: 2461: 2448: 2437:Instructions 2370: 2341: 2340: 2336: 2293: 2289: 2268: 2267: 2260: 2256: 2228: 2227: 2219: 2215: 2210: 2201: 2171: 2170: 2161: 2143: 2142: 2135: 2110: 2109: 2104: 2096: 2083: 2079: 2030: 2029: 1990: 1989: 1987: 1979: 1970: 1968: 1962: 1951: 1947: 1944:Major themes 1943: 1942: 1937: 1907:influences). 1901: 1873: 1867: 1859: 1857: 1821: 1817: 1813: 1793: 1792: 1789: 1769: 1768: 1763: 1753: 1712: 1711: 1679: 1678: 1643: 1642: 1617: 1616: 1610: 1607: 1587: 1586: 1569: 1532:TonyTheTiger 1505: 1480: 1440: 1364: 1337: 1329: 1312: 1307:Make use in 1299: 1298: 1286:Unreferenced 1284: 1283: 1276:(in Russian) 1241: 1240: 1221: 1220: 1197: 1196: 1162: 1161: 1151: 1137: 1136: 1116: 1094: 1093: 1032: 988: 923: 883: 834: 802: 798:project page 796: 786: 780: 716: 684: 670: 619: 597: 565: 543: 505:19th century 481:WikiProjects 464: 435:Good article 434: 426:May 26, 2014 422:May 26, 2011 413: 390: 385: 378: 371: 362: 354: 326: 314:Not promoted 307: 255: 253: 249:please do so 237: 236: 232: 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 5499:Michael0986 5447:Michael0986 5442:WP:SPOILERS 5408:WP:SPOILERS 5364:Michael0986 5284:Michael0986 5210:WP:SPOILERS 4690:Trilobright 3958:Long enough 3917:Created by 3872:Bram Stoker 3849:Bram Stoker 3046:Vanity Fair 2798:in articles 2451:transcluded 2257:Footnote §m 1577:Kretzulesco 1359:. Organize 1262:(in French) 1172:Review the 1048:To-do list: 393:Bram Stoker 148:free images 31:not a forum 5627:Categories 5527:80.57.2.97 5316:SalTheBear 5228:SalTheBear 5196:SalTheBear 5164:SalTheBear 5133:SalTheBear 5105:SalTheBear 5040:|answered= 4795:Capitalism 4685:Definitely 4670:80.57.2.97 4617:. pp. 360. 4589:References 4545:Thank you 4284:the case, 4274:Dracul(e)a 4014:plagiarism 3947:New enough 3870::... that 3781:Desertarun 3723:It's good! 2814:blockquote 2808:Blockquote 2547:archetypal 2404:Authorship 2390:GA toolbox 1729:one! ;) — 1549:WP:CHICAGO 1251:Translate 1213:get points 681:literature 558:novelettes 420:column on 377:(pictured) 361:column on 243:under the 5556:WP:IDLIis 5395:Moby-Dick 5085:Aaron Liu 4633:StairySky 4380:it in. — 3026:synthesis 2785:quote box 2463:Reviewer: 2427:Templates 2418:Reviewing 2383:GA Review 1588:Steel1943 1553:WP:WAWARD 1342:or other 1317:from the 1243:Translate 810:Yorkshire 804:talk page 793:Yorkshire 744:Yorkshire 469:is rated 410:Main Page 351:Main Page 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 5473:contribs 5353:contribs 5298:spoilers 5007:Grinhelm 4984:contribs 4946:contribs 4906:he did. 4828:contribs 4777:unsigned 4704:Question 4660:contribs 4537:contribs 4521:contribs 4507:contribs 4452:contribs 4394:contribs 4346:Draculea 4299:Slavonic 4286:draculea 4223:contribs 4125:: Done. 4008:Free of 3937:General: 3777:promoted 3708:contribs 3656:contribs 3575:contribs 3408:contribs 3351:contribs 3320:Not done 3262:contribs 3215:contribs 3181:contribs 3158:contribs 3119:MOS:PLOT 3089:contribs 2832:Not done 2738:Not done 2705:Not done 2687:summary. 2593:Carmilla 2514:contribs 2476:contribs 2432:Criteria 2353:contribs 2280:contribs 2240:contribs 2183:contribs 2155:contribs 2122:contribs 2042:contribs 1309:articles 554:novellas 471:GA-class 257:reassess 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 5574:Dracula 5560:Golikom 5362:right. 5337:Dracula 4903:Dracula 4730:Colin M 4412:thought 4363:Dracula 4350:Dracula 4168:Comment 4132:Overall 3998:Neutral 3977:Policy: 3908:Comment 3878:Dracula 3862:Source: 3843:Dracula 3801:Comment 3728:Colin M 3633:Colin M 3606:Colin M 3598:Dracula 3555:vampire 3520:Colin M 3443:Colin M 3365:Colin M 3288:Colin M 3273:Colin M 3225:Colin M 3192:Odyssey 3128:Colin M 3110:Odyssey 3058:Colin M 3035:Dracula 3005:Dracula 2989:Colin M 2970:Colin M 2920:Colin M 2861:WP:GACR 2539:Dracula 2529:WP:GACR 2487:Colin M 2466:Colin M 2290:Dracula 2220:Dracula 2216:Dracula 2211:Dracula 2105:Dracula 2084:Dracula 1980:Dracula 1971:Dracula 1952:Dracula 1948:Disease 1902:Dracula 1874:Dracula 1860:Dracula 1545:WP:FOUR 1511:Dracula 1483:on the 1456:Ireland 1447:Ireland 1403:Ireland 1349:Create 1328:Review 1311:of the 1231:Expand 1164:Cleanup 1153:quality 1123:WP:GOOD 1112:-status 1106:Romania 1062:history 1035:on the 1008:Romania 995:Romania 951:Romania 926:on the 837:on the 782:Dracula 719:on the 600:on the 412:in the 387:Dracula 353:in the 292:Process 233:Dracula 154:WP refs 142:scholar 25:Dracula 5484:Vadder 5416:Vadder 5401:, nor 5306:(talk) 5246:(talk) 5218:(talk) 5187:(talk) 5155:(talk) 5124:(talk) 4869:Obugov 4509:) and 4321:, and 4290:dracul 4278:dracul 4260:Guys: 4075:Image: 4016:, and 3596:. But 3488:, and 3054:per se 2800:. The 2790:says: 2337:really 1223:Expand 1148:Assess 1139:Assess 692:Horror 649:Horror 573:Novels 550:novels 500:Novels 477:scale. 424:, and 333:Listed 295:Result 126:Google 5044:|ans= 5034:This 4557:Ceoil 4511:Ceoil 4484:Ceoil 4416:Ceoil 4356:: it 4313:as a 4242:Super 4179:Super 4047:Cited 4037:Hook: 3884:devil 3511:says 2960:1930 2888:(sic) 2816:: --> 2453:from 2367:Plays 2169:). — 2167:p. 65 2008:days. 1913:With 1754:Hey, 1675:Femme 1300:Other 1115:Help 1104:Help 1072:purge 1067:watch 899:Death 890:Death 862:Death 458:This 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 5615:talk 5583:talk 5564:talk 5546:talk 5531:talk 5503:talk 5488:talk 5469:talk 5451:talk 5436:and 5420:talk 5368:talk 5349:talk 5320:talk 5288:talk 5232:talk 5200:talk 5168:talk 5137:talk 5109:talk 5089:talk 5066:talk 5011:talk 4980:talk 4961:talk 4942:talk 4889:talk 4873:talk 4853:talk 4824:talk 4805:talk 4785:talk 4748:talk 4734:talk 4718:talk 4694:talk 4674:talk 4656:talk 4637:talk 4571:talk 4563:ALT0 4553:and 4533:talk 4515:talk 4501:talk 4488:talk 4474:talk 4448:talk 4420:talk 4390:talk 4371:talk 4367:Dahn 4358:only 4335:talk 4331:Dahn 4219:talk 4156:talk 4147:ALT0 4142:ALT1 3923:talk 3868:ALT1 3835:and 3805:view 3785:talk 3732:talk 3704:talk 3684:talk 3652:talk 3610:talk 3571:talk 3524:talk 3447:talk 3404:talk 3369:talk 3347:talk 3309:Done 3292:talk 3277:talk 3258:talk 3229:talk 3211:talk 3201:. — 3177:talk 3154:talk 3132:talk 3105:here 3085:talk 3062:talk 2993:talk 2974:talk 2957:Done 2924:talk 2877:Done 2853:Edit 2849:wolf 2771:Done 2674:Done 2650:Done 2624:Done 2510:talk 2491:talk 2470:talk 2377:talk 2349:talk 2327:talk 2302:talk 2276:talk 2236:talk 2226:. — 2179:talk 2151:talk 2118:talk 2056:talk 2038:talk 2020:talk 1998:talk 1974:on). 1896:and 1888:and 1844:talk 1828:talk 1801:talk 1777:talk 1764:much 1735:talk 1720:talk 1701:talk 1687:talk 1665:talk 1651:talk 1625:talk 1615:. — 1595:talk 1475:High 1344:work 1211:and 1121:get 1057:edit 1027:High 677:film 560:and 379:and 289:Date 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 5302:PMC 5300:. ♠ 5242:PMC 5214:PMC 5183:PMC 5151:PMC 5120:PMC 5042:or 4924:22. 4744:Sca 4714:Sca 4354:now 4329:.) 4325:as 4282:not 4252:Dro 4237:old 4189:Dro 4123:QPQ 3803:or 3779:by 3762:or 3507:'s 3312:or 3195:or 2911:sic 2899:the 2566:How 2082:in 1639:PMC 918:Mid 829:Mid 711:Top 592:Top 176:TWL 5629:: 5617:) 5585:) 5566:) 5548:) 5533:) 5505:) 5490:) 5475:) 5453:) 5422:) 5397:, 5370:) 5355:) 5322:) 5304:♠ 5290:) 5282:. 5244:♠ 5234:) 5216:♠ 5202:) 5185:♠ 5170:) 5153:♠ 5139:) 5122:♠ 5111:) 5091:) 5068:) 5048:no 5013:) 4986:) 4963:) 4948:) 4891:) 4875:) 4855:) 4830:) 4807:) 4787:) 4750:) 4736:) 4720:) 4696:) 4676:) 4662:) 4639:) 4573:) 4539:) 4490:) 4476:) 4454:) 4422:) 4396:) 4373:) 4337:) 4327:dj 4319:d̦ 4315:dz 4225:) 4158:) 4134:: 4098:: 4087:: 4049:: 4020:: 4012:, 4000:: 3989:: 3960:: 3949:: 3847:, 3796:( 3787:) 3758:, 3734:) 3710:) 3686:) 3658:) 3612:) 3577:) 3526:) 3515:. 3492:. 3449:) 3438:if 3410:) 3371:) 3353:) 3294:) 3279:) 3264:) 3231:) 3217:) 3183:) 3160:) 3134:) 3121:: 3091:) 3064:) 2995:) 2976:) 2926:) 2810:}} 2806:{{ 2788:}} 2782:{{ 2516:) 2493:) 2478:) 2355:) 2329:) 2304:) 2282:) 2242:) 2185:) 2162:is 2157:) 2058:) 2044:) 2022:) 2000:) 1955:'s 1927:). 1905:'s 1884:, 1880:, 1846:) 1830:) 1803:) 1779:) 1737:) 1722:) 1703:) 1689:) 1667:) 1653:) 1627:) 1597:) 1551:/ 1547:/ 1543:/ 1539:/ 1530:.- 1524:}} 1518:{{ 1514:}} 1508:{{ 1271:, 1264:, 1110:GA 679:, 628:). 556:, 552:, 503:: 391:, 345:A 260:it 251:. 197:, 193:, 156:) 54:; 5613:( 5581:( 5562:( 5544:( 5529:( 5501:( 5486:( 5471:∙ 5467:( 5449:( 5418:( 5366:( 5351:∙ 5347:( 5318:( 5286:( 5230:( 5198:( 5166:( 5135:( 5107:( 5087:( 5064:( 5009:( 4982:∙ 4978:( 4959:( 4944:∙ 4940:( 4887:( 4871:( 4851:( 4826:∙ 4822:( 4803:( 4783:( 4746:( 4732:( 4716:( 4692:( 4672:( 4658:∙ 4654:( 4635:( 4569:( 4559:: 4555:@ 4551:: 4547:@ 4535:∙ 4531:( 4518:· 4513:( 4504:· 4499:( 4486:( 4472:( 4466:: 4462:@ 4450:∙ 4446:( 4432:' 4418:( 4392:∙ 4388:( 4369:( 4333:( 4323:j 4311:z 4247:Ψ 4221:∙ 4217:( 4206:: 4202:@ 4184:Ψ 4154:( 3929:. 3921:( 3887:? 3815:) 3783:( 3770:. 3730:( 3706:∙ 3702:( 3682:( 3676:: 3672:@ 3654:∙ 3650:( 3635:: 3631:@ 3608:( 3573:∙ 3569:( 3522:( 3445:( 3406:∙ 3402:( 3367:( 3349:∙ 3345:( 3290:( 3275:( 3260:∙ 3256:( 3227:( 3213:∙ 3209:( 3179:∙ 3175:( 3156:∙ 3152:( 3130:( 3087:∙ 3083:( 3060:( 2991:( 2972:( 2922:( 2512:∙ 2508:( 2489:( 2473:· 2468:( 2375:( 2351:∙ 2347:( 2325:( 2300:( 2278:∙ 2274:( 2238:∙ 2234:( 2181:∙ 2177:( 2153:∙ 2149:( 2124:) 2120:∙ 2116:( 2054:( 2040:∙ 2036:( 2018:( 1996:( 1842:( 1826:( 1799:( 1775:( 1733:( 1718:( 1699:( 1685:( 1663:( 1649:( 1623:( 1593:( 1555:) 1541:C 1537:T 1535:( 1487:. 1325:) 1321:( 1302:: 1295:. 1289:: 1246:: 1226:: 1202:: 1167:: 1142:: 1099:: 1039:. 997:- 930:. 841:. 807:. 723:. 604:. 483:: 428:. 418:" 414:" 367:. 359:" 355:" 262:. 199:3 195:2 191:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index