1681:"The development of these curricula marks the culmination of a process of gradual understanding of the clinical importance of intercultural understanding, variability, and recognition. The history of psychiatry is replete with examples of the consequences of the failure to achieve this recognition. One of the earliest examples of the misuse of psychiatric diagnoses in this context is the term drapetomania, which was used to describe a mental disorder that caused slaves to run away from their masters. In various studies of psychosis published in the early psychiatric literature, it was believed that mental disorders were rare under conditions of slavery but became more common following emancipation. Many of these early studies attributed mental illness in African Americans to evolutionary and phylogenetic factors. Psychodynamic explanations of mental illness in this population invoked concepts of self-hatred, as exempliļ¬ed by the workof Kardiner and Ovesey, who advanced the thesis that one of the characteristic features of African American identity is a self-directed contempt. Because of these historical precedents, African Americans came to be viewed by mental health professionals as nonverbal, hostile, unmotivated, intellectually inferior, and possessing character disorders that were not suitable for a dynamic therapeutic intervention. African American family life and child rearing practices were viewed as chaotic and psychologically destructive. Social conditions such as poverty and crime have all too often been attributed to mental illness, biology, and genetics. This has created a kind of nihilism on the part of mental health professionals, which has proven to be an impediment both to research and health care delivery. These deterministic views of race-based psychology have continued to appear in the literature and continue to exert a pernicious inļ¬uence."
1655:"For the realist the answer is straightforward: some of the current clinical categories may turn out to be like haematoma auris but this is the price of progress: eventually science will identify the false or untrue states. Conveniently it follows from this view that society should continue supporting current researchers. But since the fashion is the neurosciences, this inference means starving social scientists, philosophers, sociologists and historians from much needed funds to continue researching into mental illness. Analysis from the constructivist perspective clarifies the situation further: the issue about the predominance of the neurosciences has less to do with truth than with the current economical and legal climate and hence it is imperative that other approaches to mental illness are allowed to participate in the process of understanding..." "Indeed, it could even be said that it would be unethical not to allow other approaches to participate in the common epistemological enterprise. Without such wider conceptual participation, the haematoma auris or the drapetomania stories will happen again."
1595:, the first dedicated psychiatric hospital. The "psychiatric field" at that time would consist of all medical doctors engaged in the treatment of mental illness; the term isn't restricted to the 20th century despite the growth of the field as a specialist branch of medicine in that period. All the sources I've seen so far recognize this as part of the history of psychiatry; it may have been geographically confined to the US or even to the Southern states (the historical overview-type sources indicate somewhere between the two), and it may not have lasted very long (the American Civil War was just around the corner, so the problem of slave psychiatry didn't have much time left), but it's still very much psychiatry by any definition, however flawed in retrospect. If there were a "History of psychiatry" category as there is for psychology, neuroscience, etc. then that might be a more appropriate classification than just "Psychiatry", to reflect the fact that it's not
1652:"Pietersonās entry has all the characteristics of mature or standard science. It defined the disorder in terms of natural history, clinical correlations, pathological anatomy, genetics, etiology and treatment. There was also the professional and academic dimension in that reputations were built on being an expert in hae11lato11la auris. This meant that any trainee who sat the professional examinations of the time (the Diploma in Psychological Medicine was already going on in London) and replied that haernatorna auris was an artefact caused by keepers controlling agitated patients by grabbing their ears would have done so at his own peril (in spite of the fact that the hypothesis was already available in the 1890s). By the end of the First World War the topic disappeared from the medical press and the experts moved onto new fashions: haematoma auris was no more."
1951:. That ensures that no one can remove material from the article unless that person can supply a superior source. The Cartwright article does not have footnote references. Wikipeida wants specific sources for statements that might be challenged, without the reader having to read through a bunch of references at the end. Specifically, although some of the statements at the top can be overlooked for the time being, the material under the section Slavery is unsourced and perhaps Original Research. There is no way of knowing without footnote citations. And all quotations must be specifically referenced. Otherwise, I would agree with you that the best way to go would to merge with Cartwright as he seems to have contributed much more than just the Drapetomania pseudoscience. --
1646:"In summary, the question of what diseases are considered as current and which are not depends on far more than the modicum of āscientific truthā that it might be said to contain: it depends on factors and decisions that have nothing to do with conventional science and which issue out of higher level beliefs on what mental illness, concepts and science are, and also on the social and economic value of a given disease at the time. If so, writing on the history of diseases which are no more is no longer an exercise in antiquarianism: it becomes absolutely central to doing good history of psychiatry."
1634:"A tendency can be noticed amongst historians to concentrate on clinical states that are current, such as depression, hysteria, Alzheimerās disease or Touretteās syndrome, or fashionable, such as chronic fatigue syndrome, āimpulse disorderā or ālow IQ-geneā disease. āCurrencyā refers here to categories included in the official classifications (ICD-10 or DSM IV). āFashionablenessā, in turn, concerns ācandidateā clinical states of recent construction or reinvention which the media and the great public find interesting and/or convenient and hence are eagerly adopted by āscientificā sponsors."
1987:, but that's far from being "unreferenced", which usually means "has no sources whatsoever". Had it been sourced from a long book, it would have made sense to add footnotes so that people can check the exact pages, but it looks like it was synthesized from two short dictionary entries, so naming the two sources at the end would have been acceptable at that early stage. It will need to be tidied up as the article expands, but the absolute requirement for inline citations is more intended for the addition of controversial claims or information that is likely to be challenged.
1854:
Confederate Army. I won't pretend high school students are a reliable source, but presumably they'll reflect the most obvious points from the secondary sources they've consulted. The sources I've listed above talk about
Drapetomania in isolation, and most of them don't mention Cartwright; when he is mentioned, they name him as the originator but say nothing extra about him ā the concept is the focus, not him. This all suggests to me that the two subjects aren't conflated in the minds of the people discussing them, and so a merge either way wouldn't be helpful.
1098:
paid them much attention; I merely wish to illustrate an extreme within the range of "scientific" argument.)" Carmody's claim that
Cartwright was fringe derives from a parenthetical statement prefaced with the enormous red flag of "I doubt." Gould used Cartwright as an illustration of the most absurd "scientific" defenses of slavery he could find from the time and identifies him as "a prominent Southern physician" before expressing doubt that the intelligentsia paid him much heed and identifying him as extreme
1613:'s last paragraph above especially. I have been trying to show that while the subject matter is not currently used in psychiatry (which was clear even in the old versions of the page), it was still a psychiatric diagnosis. However flawed it may be, it is still of historical matter and I believe Wikipedians have made several steps to insure that nobody is misled to believe that it is currently diagnosed. After all, when I see the term "scientific racism," I tend to doubt that it's current psychiatric theory. -
351:
731:
250:
382:
721:
700:
616:
271:
595:
485:
836:
815:
1658:"*Disease defined by a Dr Cartwright in the USA as an āirresistible propensity to run awayā seen in Southern American slaves (p.48, Bucknill, J. C. and Tuke, D. H. (1858), A Manual of Psychological Medicine (London: John Churchill)). Conceptually, there is little difference between drapetomania and the so-called āimpulse-disorder diseaseā recently proposed by a London researcher group."
2933:
manipulated and found high concentrations of "madness" among free Blacks in the northern US. Cartwright's paper was, in part, an explanation of this madness. His section on dysaethesia aethiopica refers to the fact that northern doctors were familiar with the symptoms of the disease but "they ignorantly attribute the symptoms to the debasing influence of slavery on the mind". ā
1640:"It would seem, therefore, that research into this field is needed particularly for there are other past examples of equally suspicious clinical categories (e.g., drapetomania*, catalepsy, neurasthenia and haematoma auris - the topic of the present Classic Text) whose inception, inclusion and eventual dismissal from the official classifications remains poorly understood."
219:
190:
1649:"Perusal of the extensive literature and serious science that went on haematoma auris since the 1860s up to the turn of the century shows that the term was used to refer to either a symptom, syndrome or disease. The observable phenomenon was a change in the shape and colour of the ear lobules of in-patients suffering from a variety of mental disorder."
2903:, "How to Save the Republic, and the Position of the South in the Union", an article by Cartwright in which he argues against abolition. The first few paragraphs are interesting, he says he hopes his medical paper can be used to assist in saving the Union by raising awareness of scientific discoveries of differences between whites and blacks.
1206:
illness. While certainly saying it is a medical diagnosis makes sense, "psychiatric" is more specific and since another user added it in the first place, I am inclined to agree with him/her. I am possibly going to revert this, but would like Malik's opinion first. I agree with the deletion of the
Oppositional Defiant, but not this. -
2223:
you would have to add "Drapetomania and
Dysaesthesia aethiopica" at the top, which doesn't make much sense. If you want to redirect it to Cartwright's article, I'd be for it, since dys. aethiopica doesn't seem to be as well-known as Drapetomania. I will edit Cartwright's article to include information on Dysaethesia aethiopica. -
626:
372:
1565:
AFD and the edit-warring over sources and decided to go look for some better ones. I'm hoping they can be used to improve the article. It's clearly a topic for which a range of sources exist, and, being historically documented, is not inherently POV (in the way that the "Psychiatric abuse" article was).
2855:
I presume she means "having three small articles has the effect of trivializing them", rather than "my intention is to trivialize them". I disagree, because I think there's enough for three good separate articles, but I assume the comment was made in good faith rather than any "agenda to trivialize".
2543:
as an example here. The phrenology article has various categories at the bottom that I think could be similarly applied to this drapetomania article. An "Obsolete psychiatric theories" category would be good. If one of you could argue it with the
Psychiatry project (I assume there is one), that would
1787:
until it becomes clear whether both articles would benefit from the merge. At present you're claiming you can only find one source for the information thus the topic should be part of the originator. Maybe there are more sources or it was known separate from the individual. Reexamine it in a year.
1583:
The NYT article quotes a clinical professor of psychiatry at
Harvard Medical School (presumably independent of the anti-psychiatry movement) using Drapetomania as a prime example of how the classification of psychopathology can be influenced by cultural factors; he's actually calling for racism to be
1260:
Although I withdrew the AFD because of the instant harassment and attacking, Drapetomania has been brought to the attention of the
Medical deletion project cleaning up false and misleading articles placed under a medical category as this one was. It will be monitored, and returned to AFD if false and
3021:
at the given reference, I get the impression that the author (an MD, not a historian) is inadvertently synthesizing: he's described a condition blamed for slaves running away, then found a description of a historical punishment for runaways, and presented the two in a way that suggests a connection.
1911:
is fine with me. In fact, that may be the better idea as the
Drapetomania article is now cleaned up and well referenced. The Cartwright article is unreferenced with large Original Research seeming section at the end and is much less interesting. Would hate to see the Drapetomania article screwed up
1865:
You are right that there is more to
Cartwright than just this. However the drapetomania article has only two paragraphs on its subject. After that it starts talking about another disease Cartwright "discovered". It seems if there is so little to say on the topic it might be just as well to make it
996:
I agree with 86.135.181.94, although at first I didn't. Drapetomania was an example of how science & medicine may be abused in order to enforce particular attitudes and behaviours. Anti-Psychiatry certainly came along much later, but it's talking about exactly the same thing, so it makes sense
3033:
I'm also a bit skeptical that toe amputation was practiced in the US ā the source given is "Human
Behavior Magazine" (which appears to be a kind of pop psychology magazine from the 70s, only indirect search hits), whereas the punishment usually described in historical works is "hobbling" by cutting
2514:
depicts an enslaved family escaping on horseback." I know no more about slavery or pseudoscience than your average AmericanāI came to this entry after watching "C.S.A.: Confederate States of America" on Friday, looking to find out more about "drapetomania" as referred to in the movie. It was within
1205:
Incorrect. And Malik, please read this. I added a reference to the beginning sentence which mentioned the subject was a psychiatric diagnosis, which it indeed was. Mattisse, you're referring to a different reference that I added. Psychiatry is the branch of medicine dealing with the mind and mental
2691:
I have no problem with merging the two sections. I am the creator of one of them, remember. Malik's move in no way was a violation. Please stop hounding him, Mattisse. Let it go, and recognize that he is a significant and great contributor to this article. All you have done is complain about other
2222:
I believe Dysaethesia aethiopica should be merged with Cartwright's article, per Knowledge standards. Dysaethesia aethiopica is a separate entity from Drapetomania, though they are both evidence of scientific racism by the same "scientist." If we stick with this merge/redirect for dys. aethiopica,
1853:
which appears to have been written by a class of high school students; the entry for Cartwright doesn't mention Drapetomania, although it does mention his other works on "race theory", his apparently notable writings on yellow fever and cholera, and his work improving sanitary conditions among the
1564:
I'm not "presenting a view" ā these are the sources I found during a search. I'm not cherry-picking them to support a particular viewpoint, simply trying to establish whether there is enough coverage to support a balanced, well-sourced article. I didn't have a prior opinion on this, I just saw the
1537:
etc. are fine. Please provide an unbiased third party source showing that this diagnosis was employed as a psychiatric diagnosis in the 1800s by the "psychiatric establishment". Also, what was the psychiatric establishment then, as those were the days of Freud and Jung? So far,it appears it is one
1283:
Please stop your personal crusade. You are clearly assuming bad faith among other Knowledge users and stirring up problems. I don't mind you bringing this to the attention of the Medicine deletion project (though you are pretending the project is something it is not), but you are causing countless
1156:
I removed the sentence. Another possibility was that Cartwright mentioned this in his book, with the point being that it was sometimes done but if slaveowers were to use his "medical" procedures they would not have to do that. Anyway the sentence in the article did not even assert any relationship
967:
yes, but it (according to some people) may prove that what is now termed "mental illness" is in reality just behaviour at odds with current socio-cultural values, in exactly the same way that escaping slaves in mid 19th-century North America were not behaving as they "should" do and were therefore
2289:
I would vote for 3 articles, or merging Dysaethesia with Cartwright. I don't think merging the 2 "disorders" together makes much sense. In that case you might as well merge them both into Cartwright since he is the common element that brings them together. I learned a lot about the topics during
1575:
is a handbook for practicing psychiatrists and so is completely unrelated to the anti-psychiatry movement; it discusses Drapetomania as an example of how cultural factors can distort mental health diagnosis ā in fact, it's given as the main historical US example of that tendency. The source shows
1102:
the contemporary window of scientific debate rather than as outside the era's academic Overton window. The current wording erases all of this nuance and takes as rote Carmody's interpretation of Gould's parenthetical clarification while failing to carry through his description of Cartwright as "a
1097:
on Page 70, Gould's claim is far less assertive. He says, "Among nonpolygenist, 'scientific' defenses of slavery, no arguments ever matched in absurdity the doctrines of S. A. Cartwright, a prominent Southern physician. (I do not cite these as typical and I doubt that many intelligent Southerners
1035:
While undoubtedly a spectacular example of bad science, the article does not state how influential the theory was. How many doctors actually make a diagnosis of drapetomania? How quickly did serious rebuttals begin to be published? How late did anyone believe this nonsense? If the answers are
3124:
Unfortunately, you're using a circular definition which has been set up by you to exclude what you want it to exclude. Plenty of diseases with mental effects which did not have any known biological correlates in the past now do have such correlates, and the number of diseases known to have such
1579:
Another book is on the history of the diagnosis of fugue conditions. Again, I'm assuming in the absence of contrary indications that this is a reliable secondary source and is unrelated to the anti-psychiatry movement; it notes Drapetomania as being historically significant because its prevalent
2932:
also reprints Cartwright's paper in full, and can be read at Amazon.com. (I find Amazon more user-friendly than Google Books because it's easier to search for words and phrases.) To give a little context, which I'm going to add to Cartwright's biography soon, the results of the 1840 census were
1264:
I might be helpful if, not only did you learn something about psychology and psychiatry before you start adding terms, you learned something about the history of psychiatry and psychology. Psychology as a formal field distinct from psychiatry did not exist until World War II. Psychiatry in the
2081:
Certainly many doctors did advocate and practice Cartwright's suggestions. I don't know who added the link below, but it should make that clear to you. Really, all you needed to do was a simple Google search and read the other comments here. Your merging all these articles is um, a bad idea. -
1931:
sourced ā he has an entry in two separate dictionaries of biography. For anything other than news events of the last few decades, printed sources are generally superior to web links. As for the "original research" claim: which part of that section do you take issue with? The use of "scientific
1092:
I'm uncomfortable with the current statement that "The contemporary southern intelligentsia regarded Cartwright as a fringe figure." Todd Carmody, in the source cited for this claim attributes its own claim to Stephen Jay Gould, does in fact claim that "Cartwright was a fringe figure to whom
1878:
I strongly believe that the article will be expanded and that you are not giving it enough time to do so by suggesting this merge. I have looked at Google Scholar previously and saw hundreds of academic articles about the subject. By suggesting a merge, you make it seem like the subject is
1425:: "Nowadays, drapetomania does not ring a bell for most people. It did in the nineteenth century, at least in the United States. Official Western medicine then recognised drapetomania, the tendency of slaves to run away from their owners, as a disease that commonly affected black persons."
2264:
Sure, there's no hurry. Things are moving too fast as it is: the AfD lasted a couple of hours, the last merge proposal was withdrawn after 20 minutes, so I can understand if you're paranoid it'll get zapped while you get some food... suggest we give this a few days while things cool down?
1075:
The text The Social Ideas of American Physicians (1776-1976) by Eugene P. Link, which can be Googled and read online, states that Cartwright's influences on medical practices extended to the WWII era. It doesn't specifically refer to drapetomania, but that was just one of many claims he
2042:"Otherwise, I would agree with you that the best way to go would to merge with Cartwright as he seems to have contributed much more than just the Drapetomania pseudoscience." This seems to be bizarre reasoning to me. If anything, I would have had the opposite conclusion. See below. -
2544:
work. BTW, I don't think this should be merged with Samuel A. Cartwright. I did put his picture on this article, but if anything, drapetomania gained more notoriety than Cartwright himself and drapetomania is more important. And I do think Cartwright deserves his own article too. -
2178:
I went ahead and removed the information about the other "disorder" Cartwright "discovered", dysaethesia aethiopica, and merged that into his article. There are now two paragraphs about drapetomania. Go ahead and expand it with more information. I withdraw my merge nomination.
3145:
I think the information in this article is generally fine, but the article itself is written very badly and in a way that's inconsistent with the acceptable tone for a Knowledge article. Edits made around the time this topic was posted will attempt to clean things up a bit.
1879:
unimportant or not very notable, but with the dozens of references down the page and a simple Google search, one can tell that the subject is indeed notable enough for its own namespace. A merge like this should only be suggested for sure-fire reasons in my opinion. -
2722:
I have no idea what you're referring to, but I didn't have anything to do with it. Cyborg Ninja and Thomjakobsen made comments about the merger at the bottom of the page, and I moved them to the bottom of the merger section. I kept the heading they used. Here's the
2611:
The "History of psychiatry" category sounds like a good idea too. Maybe that is the best since it can cover obsolete theories, too. I asked Mattisse to consider adding the category but she threw a tantrum and has in essence stopped talking to anyone on Knowledge. -
1538:
medical doctor's idiosyncratic thought that has captured the imagination of many people today and they like reading about his thinking. No one denies that his views existed as pseudoscience or a "supposed" diagnosis. Is there verification that he was a psychiatrist?
1700:
I removed the tag as another editor has provided an appropriate introduction that adds some context. The article, in my opinion, still gives undue weight to the opinions of a long discredited diagnosis proposed by one man in the form of long, unanalyzed quotes.
3025:
It isn't mentioned in Cartwright's essays, and in fact he comes across as quaintly paternalistic, describing the slaves as children who need to be cared for but not allowed too much freedom, and he specifically says that mistreatment by cruel owners is often a
1630:
by Berrios who often writes conceptual insightful stuff on psychiatric classification. Since it's password protected I'll give some extracts of what he seems to be saying of relevance to this article and the prior debate I see about deletion/modern context:
2515:
that context that I scratched my head at this painting, wondering what it had to do with Cartwright. That simple contextual note may be something that would allow the image to remain, as I gather you desire, without confusing readers. --
1494:
as these sources show it belonged to that field in 19th C. USA and was actively being used as a diagnosis, as opposed to being the fringe theory of an isolated individual. If that category's restricted to current Psychiatry, then
3064:
I've just spent time on this, which I don't believe is sufficiently sourced. I believe I have read the entirety of Cartwright's paper which is reproduced in a contemporary source, and does not mention any such thing. However
2955:
Yes, the importance of "scientific" arguments for slavery leading up to the civil war would be an excellent "context" expansion in all three articles, and could probably make for an article of its own. The existing section at
2589:
Yes, I think that's what I said in the second sentence there ("this wouldn't fit"). Following the example of Phrenology, we put it in a historical category to distinguish it from current practice. In this case, that would be
1480:
1145:
amputated, perhaps as "treatment" for drapetomania, but that Cartwright himself never prescribed this. Anyway, perhaps I will check local libraries for the Szasz book, and try to find his source. No promises though.
3034:
the Achilles' tendon behind one of the ankles. Toe amputation would have carried an unacceptably high risk of infection and thus loss of work to the economically-minded slavers ā perhaps it's a much earlier practice.
1059:
Yes it would be really good to get a reliable idea of how widespread/longlasting the diagnosis was, how many black people affected by it etc. One unreliable source says "many". Not sure if the above link covers it.
1223:
It would be helpful if you identified the source a little more specifically than "the reference just added", since 7 references have been added today. I have restored "psychiatric" (in place of "medical") because
2130:
1016:
Willmcw, i think what 86.135.181.94 meant is something like pathology paradigm, where some people are treated as "ill" or "pathologic" by science/psychology, but are, in fact, just different or misunderstood --
762:
153:
2707:
comment got moved above the discussion to which I was referring in my comment? Whoever did that messed up the context of all the following comments in addition to taking my comment out of context. I object.
1543:...examples of prejudice cloaked in pseudo-science are regrettably common in the history of psychiatric medicine, common enough to provoke denials that there is such a thing as mental illness (e.g., Szasz 1987)
3108:
All mental illness have been and are conjectural. None has been or can be validated by any anatomical or biological test. If such a test existed, the diseases would not be "mental," it would be neurological.
1413:
1350:
You are setting up a very unfortunate atmosphere here. My original AFD statement was not even a recommendation to delete. It was open ended. Yet you choose to attack me rather than focus on the article.
2013:
If you just source the slavery section I will be happy. You can always comment out parts and return them when you find the references. I agree that the totality of the man is much more complex than the
1464:
2242:
Granted, Dysaethesia aethiopica isn't as widely-known as drapetomania, but there are more than 300 non-Knowledge Google hits. I haven't had a chance to go through them at length. I'd like to add to
3147:
1428:
1422:
1036:(say) "lots", "decades later" and "1927", this is an important article. If the answers are "just Dr Cartwright", "the following week" and "the following week" then it's just a piece of trivia.
1568:
The list reflects what I found. Although Szasz would not be considered a reliable main source, he is nevertheless a notable figure and so his references to this diagnosis would merit coverage.
1643:"What is the ārealā difference, then, between mental symptoms or diseases that are current and those which are no more? The answer depends on the view one holds about the nature of disease."
1391:
You have link a nonexistent article under See also. You have also categorized the article in a nonexistent category. Perhaps it would help if you read through the AFD on the recently deleted
1945:
If you look at the Drapetomania article, which has received some very good editing over the last day, including Addhoc and others, you will see that the article has reference citations per
516:
503:
1587:
As for, "what was the psychiatric establishment then, as those were the days of Freud and Jung?" Those two don't come into prominence until the early 1900s, half a century later. The
3189:
1435:(now part of the DSM-IV), suggesting that its slow reception in the US may have been due to drapetomania being a "predecessor diagnosis" that would be preferred over that of fugue.
438:
428:
2890:, covering Jul. 1851āJan. 1852, has a full copy of Cartwright's paper to the Medical Convention of Louisiana. The volume itself is about 760 pages, so links to the relevant bits:
2817:
I don't know about you guys, but trying to "trivialize" historical topics does not bode well with Knowledge I believe. More on the Dys. aethiopica talk page. Everyone, please see
2487:
Drapetomania was purported to be the reason why black slaves fled captivity. The painting illustrates slaves fleeing captivity. It seems like a fairly straightforward connection.
914:, I've suggested that this article does not belong in that newly-created category. I'm suggesting "Former psychiatric disorders" as a category to hold it instead. Any thoughts? -
1627:, a psychiatric diagnosis at the time. The mention of drapetomania is in a modern intro to the reprint, that's mainly in another PDF, pages 371-375 in the journal archive list
1774:
It seems to me that the concept of Drapetomania only existed in relationship to Cartwright, and he is mainly known only for that. It seems logical to merge the two articles.
3219:
3194:
1584:
classified as a disorder, so really he's at the opposite end of the scale to Szasz. This shows that it's not just an anti-psychiatry topic and that it has current relevance.
797:
787:
2246:
Cartwright's prescription for preventing and treating the disease. Please give me a little time (it's dinner time), see what I come up with, and consider the merger then. ā
3043:
Cartwright suggested in New Orleans Medical and Surgical Journal that slave owners could treat and cure this 'medical disorder' by whipping slaves and amputating their toes
1571:
The other sources are varied, I would ask you to click on the links and check them out before dismissing the whole list on the basis of a single source. In particular, the
2821:. I'd like to know what you think about the "trivializing the three articles" agenda. I have a feeling that the article or comment might get erased, so I'll post it here:
529:
3234:
1514:
886:
876:
2056:
Cartwright is known beyond his theory of drapetomania, as is evident from the Cartwright article. Drapetomania itself is a well-known topic of historical importance. -
3224:
2579:"Neuroscience" fits the concepts upon which Phrenology is based better than the concepts behind this article's topic, so I don't think neuroscience quite fits here. (
2124:
404:
147:
1395:
to understand why this is inappropriate. It is important for you to have an overview of the issues on Knowledge before you start creating articles and categories. --
1373:-- you know very well that it is only used to nominate articles for deletion. You cannot use it as a "cleanup" tag would be used. That is against Knowledge policy. -
3184:
1623:
I had a look at the 1999 History of Psychiatry source helpfully listed above by Thomjakobsen. That particular article is a reprinting of a 19th century article on
3239:
2825:
Propose merge. Three small articles on essentially same topic prevents a clear picture. Articles are split off from main preventing a whole picture from emerging:
941:
in the US Slavery section which I have removed and simply redirected to this more complete and correct one (the old one offered no information this one did not).
2018:
part. And the total history of the man puts the Drapetomania in the context of the era, which makes less lurid and more a sign of the complexity of the times. --
757:
1968:
support a merge with Cartwright, as I've tried to make clear in my comment earlier in this section. I think a merge would be inappropriate in either direction.
1591:
was founded in 1844 (under a different name), but the medical treatment of mental illness can be traced back to at least the 13th century with the founding of
3066:
3214:
200:
1474:
3204:
3174:
852:
682:
672:
395:
356:
333:
323:
1580:
diagnosis in the US may have been a factor in the slow adoption of fugue-related diagnoses (nowadays covered in the DSM-IV under dissociative disorders).
3229:
2989:
had a section that specifically referred to slavery. When I get some more sources together, I'll add some information there and to the census article. ā
2369:
Isn't that an instance of the pot calling the kettle black, your excellency? Please apologize for your demeaning and vitriolic comments referring to me,
552:
79:
1932:
racism" to justify the South's antebellum position is well documented, Cartwright's views of blacks can be confirmed by checking out his book, and the
2405:
2233:
I think a redirect to Cartwright would do. It seems to be mentioned only as a sidenote to drapetomania, and doesn't have the contemporary references.
2067:
If drapetomania was really a topic of wider importance then evidence for that needs to be found. Did any other doctors advocate Cartwright's views?
1517:. I wish the talk pages for the deleted article were available. Extensive discussions took place on the view you are presenting above. For example,
3209:
3179:
753:
744:
705:
2727:. I didn't disrupt the flow of the discussion. I kept all the comments in chrono order. Among rational people, this wouldn't be an issue at all. ā
1637:"How, when and why does a clinical state come to be included in an official classification is not as clear a process as one might expect." ...
2000:
The "slavery" section is currently unsourced and can be improved but I don't see which part would constitute original research in the sense of
911:
843:
820:
1818:
I agree that Cartwright seems notable principally in relation to these diseases. I think his biography should be merged into this article. ā
648:
299:
85:
3076:
I believe that if this happened in relation to Cartwright's hypothetical disease, there will be a citable source from contemporary evidence.
3199:
3169:
3070:
1912:
with unreferenced stuff from the Cartwright article. recommend only merging information that has reference citations into Drapetomania. --
533:
44:
1317:
Apparently you think a prestigious medical university is not a reliable source, Mattisse? If this keeps up, I'll need to call a review. -
3055:
I'll get rid of it (I added it in the first place). I've never read his papers thoroughly and I think you know more about the subject. -
2998:
2942:
2909:, "Diseases and Peculiarities of the Negro Race", part 2. This section deals in particular with Drapetomania and Dysaethesia Aethiopica.
2796:
2736:
2674:
This is the problems. This is not the time to cause even more confusion and without consensus, and when there is confusion already. --
2658:
2382:
2340:
2317:
believed the only reason African Americans would flee slavery was drapetomania? I believe this needs to be clarified and referenced. --
2255:
2205:
1827:
1731:
1441:
is an appearance of the term in the journal "History of Psychiatry", but it requires a subscription so I don't know how relevant it is.
1284:
problems related to this article by trying to provide a point about pseudoscience. What's funny is that Drapetomania is included in the
1241:
510:
3151:
2394:
I, for one, was not adversely affected by his comment. I thought he was giving a compliment and indicating respect of your insight. (
1534:
1500:
921:
I've just filed it under "mental illness", "pseudoscience" and "racism". Samuel Cartwright really was a piece of shit^H^H^H^Hwork. --
561:
2488:
1496:
2562:. I notice the page for that category includes psychiatry, but I assume it's intended for areas of overlap and this wouldn't fit.
2671:
2559:
1841:
The lede of Cartwright's article suggests this isn't the main cause of his notability, and as it's sourced to modern editions of
1588:
639:
600:
278:
255:
1175:
Please try to learn what psychiatry is. The only time the word "psychiatry is used in your reference is in the following quote:
99:
30:
2591:
2563:
1384:
104:
20:
1130:
Szasz is not unbiased; besides, almost everyone is somewhat biased against racists. Szasz is, anyway, not a primary source.
2145:
168:
74:
2456:
Sorry. I thought it was implied that it was Cartwright who was saying so. With you guys' help I hope this is now clear.
2112:
135:
2964:'s article has no mention of it either, nor his famous "Here is proof of the necessity of slavery" address to Congress.
1343:
Thank you for adding another reference to questionable statement - please stop referring to my edits as bad faith edits
400:
230:
2309:, according to the caption, say that the topic of his picture was African Americans fleeing slavery as a the result of
2196:, but I was waiting for resolution of the merger question. Now that the merger proposal is moot, I'm going to do so. ā
1802:
I'm not suggesting removing any information from either article. Just put them together on the same page and redirect.
1760:
I've removed the block quotes and included a few more secondary references to hopefully improve the article's balance.
2818:
2567:
752:
content on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
749:
65:
1303:
Citing a cancer website does not prove anything about psychiatry. Please try to maintain a professional standard. --
2965:
2912:
2906:
2900:
298:
related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
3087:
2845:
I definitely find this worrying. These are relevant historical topics, and we users here have made that clear. -
2510:
Perhaps the caption could be modified to indicate that? Perhaps something like "Eastman Johnson's 1862 painting,
1850:
736:
196:
2404:
Perhaps you were not adversely affected by his comment because his comment was not directed at you. Please see
2355:. It makes constructive work on the article much harder when one editor is making such comments to another. --
1983:
1947:
1526:
3017:
I have serious doubts as to whether this "remedy" has anything to do with Cartwright's diagnosis. Reading the
2894:
2106:
129:
2994:
2938:
2792:
2732:
2654:
2378:
2336:
2251:
2201:
1823:
1727:
1461:
in which drapetomania is part of a list of historical diagnoses used by psychiatrists for abusive purposes.
1237:
109:
2243:
2193:
1592:
1530:
1487:
1108:
2102:
125:
2990:
2934:
2788:
2728:
2650:
2494:
2374:
2352:
2332:
2247:
2197:
1819:
1723:
1233:
1081:
969:
547:
Place either of the following WikiProject banners on United States History-related articles and assess:
236:
3038:
1392:
1365:
I have never "attacked" you -- merely refuted your false statements and tried to improve this article.
1261:
misleading material purporting to be medical, psychiatric or psychological is returned to the article.
1018:
1077:
3084:
1705:
1624:
387:
2152:
218:
189:
175:
2595:
2138:
1686:
1675:
1665:
1491:
1447:
at Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, where it is mentioned as part of the "history of psychiatry".
1065:
371:
350:
161:
55:
1299:
Please do not remove questionable source tags without correcting the problem as you have just done
1147:
1093:'intelligent Southerners' paid little heed." However, tracing this claim back to Gould himself in
982:
960:
942:
930:
915:
851:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
647:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
403:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
3130:
70:
2469:
This problem, a year later, remains. I can't see what this painting has to do with the topic.--
3114:
3056:
3046:
2986:
2969:
2957:
2919:
2857:
2846:
2779:
comment was the first comment made, so of course it appears before the discussion. Here's the
2693:
2613:
2599:
2571:
2545:
2457:
2291:
2280:
2266:
2234:
2224:
2180:
2083:
2068:
2057:
2043:
2005:
1937:
1880:
1867:
1855:
1803:
1775:
1614:
1610:
1600:
1504:
1374:
1344:
1318:
1289:
1207:
1158:
631:
497:
51:
3018:
2520:
2491:
2474:
1981:
As to the Cartwright article: the upper sections don't exactly meet the style guidelines at
1050:
848:
270:
249:
1265:
1800's was philosophically based and not scientifically based, with few exceptions such as
1137:
sources regarding drapetomania are actually secondary to one paper published by Cartwright.
2961:
2314:
2306:
2118:
1522:
1285:
1188:
with modern day diagnostic classification, which was the issue. But thanks for trying. --
1104:
1037:
956:
949:
141:
3045:", but this is mistaken. No mention of toes in the paper, unless I've missed something.
1576:
that modern psychiatry recognizes this topic as being of relevance to current practice.
1682:
1661:
1061:
922:
904:
523:
484:
2841:
The effect is to trivialize all three articles. --Mattisse 02:12, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
2279:
Just so you know, I've added a link to the Talk page for Dys. aethiopica to an RfC. -
720:
699:
3163:
3126:
2866:
2675:
2628:
2432:
2409:
2370:
2356:
2318:
2019:
1952:
1913:
1896:
1745:
1709:
1551:
1396:
1352:
1327:
1304:
1270:
1266:
1189:
1127:
Given Cartwright's paternalistic attitude it seems implausible he would prescribe it.
1046:
929:
Thanks, I really didn't want to have to create a new category just for this article.
291:
287:
2753:
Oh, I was thinking about something else, not that shuffle down here. Never mind. (
1471:(a psychiatric text) as part of the chapter "Cultural Considerations in Diagnosis".
3110:
2754:
2709:
2580:
2422:
2395:
2310:
2015:
2001:
1789:
1518:
1458:
1438:
1185:
24:
2886:
Google Books has digitized copies of the collected "volumes" of this publication.
1229:
2516:
2470:
2165:
1761:
1628:
1432:
1171:
The reference just added, while I comend anyone for trying, is not to psychiatry
998:
938:
615:
594:
2421:
I see, and he has made himself clear now. Personal attack from him deleted. (
1256:
Drapetomania has been brought to the attention of the Medicine deletion project
2887:
2555:
2540:
1778:
1225:
726:
644:
621:
377:
295:
2922:
2408:
to evaluate whether that comment might be directed at me as a compliment. --
1708:'s biography. Perhaps this article should be merged with his biography. --
2373:, or I will continue to respond to you in the manner I deem appropriate. ā
1676:
A psychiatric residency curriculum on the Care of African American Patients
835:
814:
2623:
Bad practice to refactor talk page without concensus - it causes confusion
1450:
1444:
959:? Drapetomania was coined before psychiatry as we know it even existed. -
1094:
283:
2351:
Please do not make pejorative or sarcastic comments referring to me,
2192:
I was going to split this article and create a separate article about
3073:
which gives says "doctors" did it, providing no source for the claim.
3155:
3134:
3118:
3092:
3059:
3049:
3002:
2972:
2958:
Scientific racism#Justification of slavery in the nineteenth century
2946:
2873:
2860:
2849:
2800:
2757:
2740:
2712:
2696:
2682:
2662:
2635:
2616:
2602:
2583:
2574:
2548:
2524:
2497:
2478:
2460:
2439:
2425:
2416:
2398:
2386:
2363:
2344:
2325:
2294:
2283:
2269:
2259:
2237:
2227:
2209:
2183:
2168:
2086:
2071:
2060:
2046:
2026:
2008:
1959:
1940:
1920:
1903:
1883:
1870:
1858:
1831:
1806:
1792:
1764:
1752:
1735:
1716:
1690:
1669:
1617:
1603:
1558:
1507:
1403:
1377:
1359:
1334:
1321:
1311:
1292:
1277:
1245:
1210:
1196:
1161:
1150:
1112:
1085:
1069:
1053:
1040:
972:
1521:
is not considered a neutral, unbiased source as he is part of the
1469:
Handbook of Relational Diagnosis and Dysfunctional Family Patterns
1849:, there's no reason to suspect it's unbalanced. There's an essay
1045:
Here's a good new source, perhaps you'll find the ansers there: "
1288:
article itself. Are you going to crusade about that as well? -
1184:
I fear that does not support anything about the connection of
212:
184:
15:
3079:
On balance I am re(?)-removing this, pending a better source.
1326:
A cancer institute is not a reliable psychiatric source. --
1866:
a section in the other article, with a redirect of course.
1228:
is the "branch of medicine dealing with the ... mind", and
2004:. Which statements in particular are you concerned about?
756:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
2897:, "Diseases and Peculiarities of the Negro Race", part 1.
912:
Category talk:Mental illness diagnosis by DSM and ISCDRHP
564:|class=|importance=|UShistory=Yes|UShistory-importance=}}
1936:
articles are again verifiable with a trip to a library.
399:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
2780:
2724:
2692:
users' edits because they didn't fit your viewpoint. -
473:
468:
463:
458:
2641:
Give it a rest. I moved comments regarding the merger
2137:
1179:
Dr. Benjamin Rush, the "father" of American psychiatry
160:
1455:
American Journal of Psychiatry Schizophrenia Bulletin
1123:
I've added the dubious tag to the toe claim because:
2787:
and the preceding and following comments. Sheesh. ā
2566:
would be nice, alongside all the similar subcats in
1269:. So you are mixing apples and oranges. Regards, --
847:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
643:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
282:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
2960:is pretty short with no mention of the census, and
1477:: "Bigotry as Mental Illness Or Just Another Norm"
3125:correlates will continue to expand in the future.
2865:Yes, it appears the comment was misunderstood. --
2784:
3030:of drapetomania (whippings apparently excluded).
1515:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Psychiatric abuse
2218:Merging Dysaethesia aethiopica with Drapetomania
1387:- nonexistent article & nonexistent category
517:United States History articles needing infoboxes
504:United States History articles needing attention
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1704:This article with the long quotes is long than
1541:
1177:
3190:Low-importance United States History articles
2151:
1744:Humm. Does that mean I must become white? --
1503:are options which it should be under anyway.
937:Please note that there is a misspelled entry
763:History of Science Collaboration of the Month
174:
8:
1232:was "a disease of the mind" (Cartwright). ā
1103:prominent Southern physician" at the time.
981:Which "some people" are we talking about? -
413:Knowledge:WikiProject United States History
3220:Low-importance history of science articles
3195:WikiProject United States History articles
2775:Besides, what are you talking about? Your
809:
694:
589:
492:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
446:
416:Template:WikiProject United States History
345:
244:
195:This article was previously nominated for
3037:The only other reference I could find is
2813:Agenda to "trivialize" all three articles
2512:A Ride for Liberty ā The Fugitive Slaves,
2406:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Mattisse 2
1490:(that's how it's viewed today), but also
968:identified as having a mental illness. --
748:, an attempt to improve and organize the
530:Stub-Class United States History articles
3235:Mid-importance African diaspora articles
2783:. Also, take a look at the time next to
1847:Dictionary of American Medical Biography
1141:My guess is that toes of runaway slaves
772:Knowledge:WikiProject History of Science
450:WikiProject United States History To-do:
3225:WikiProject History of Science articles
3148:2600:1700:8DF0:B150:1114:6138:961B:932F
2830:Dysaethesia Aethiopica (this article) +
2331:I edited the caption, your highness. ā
997:to link it in the "See Also" section.--
811:
775:Template:WikiProject History of Science
696:
591:
347:
246:
216:
3185:C-Class United States History articles
861:Knowledge:WikiProject African diaspora
3240:WikiProject African diaspora articles
1047:DRAPETOMANIA A Disease Called Freedom
864:Template:WikiProject African diaspora
7:
841:This article is within the scope of
637:This article is within the scope of
534:Category:United States history stubs
393:This article is within the scope of
276:This article is within the scope of
3215:C-Class history of science articles
2915:, "Diseases and ā¦", part 3 (final).
2164:- sufficient references available.
1843:A Dictionary of Louisiana Biography
1573:Handbook of Relational Diagnosis...
1486:I agree that this should belong to
235:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
3205:Low-importance psychology articles
3175:Low-importance Skepticism articles
3069:ascribes it to Cartwright, citing
2290:this discussion. Thanks everyone.
1535:Category:Obsolete medical theories
1501:Category:Obsolete medical theories
14:
3230:C-Class African diaspora articles
1497:Category:History of mental health
553:WikiProject United States History
396:WikiProject United States History
2672:Knowledge:Refactoring talk pages
2560:Category:History of neuroscience
1895:a merge one way or the other. --
1589:American Psychiatric Association
1157:with toe-cutting to Cartwright.
834:
813:
729:
719:
698:
657:Knowledge:WikiProject Psychology
624:
614:
593:
483:
380:
370:
349:
308:Knowledge:WikiProject Skepticism
269:
248:
217:
188:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
3210:WikiProject Psychology articles
3180:WikiProject Skepticism articles
1467:it is briefly discussed in the
955:What does this have to do with
881:This article has been rated as
792:This article has been rated as
677:This article has been rated as
660:Template:WikiProject Psychology
433:This article has been rated as
328:This article has been rated as
311:Template:WikiProject Skepticism
2985:Thanks. I didn't realize that
2592:Category:History of psychiatry
2564:Category:History of psychiatry
1385:Political abuses of psychiatry
760:. You can also help with the
745:History of Science WikiProject
419:United States History articles
1:
2535:Obsolete psychiatric theories
1770:Merge to Cartwright's article
1691:13:55, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
1670:11:17, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
1113:06:58, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
1070:10:43, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
855:and see a list of open tasks.
651:and see a list of open tasks.
407:and see a list of open tasks.
302:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
3093:16:06, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
3060:20:25, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
2525:18:16, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
2498:04:16, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
2479:02:32, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
1722:That's very white of you. ā
1419:, courtesy of Google Books.
1151:22:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
1086:21:02, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
1054:06:12, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
1041:04:08, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
1001:04:17, August 27, 2005 (UTC)
985:14:33, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
844:WikiProject African diaspora
742:This article is part of the
401:history of the United States
3200:C-Class psychology articles
3170:C-Class Skepticism articles
3050:19:52, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
3003:23:16, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
2973:23:12, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
2968:is pretty much a stub too.
2947:21:25, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
2923:15:33, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
2874:21:50, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
2861:15:36, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
2850:15:04, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
2819:Talk:Dysaethesia_Aethiopica
2801:05:23, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
2758:05:21, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
2741:05:15, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
2713:04:33, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
2697:02:47, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
2683:02:31, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
2663:02:18, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
2649:. So what's the problem? ā
2636:02:15, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
2617:12:14, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
2603:14:04, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
2584:04:36, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
2575:22:32, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
2568:Category:History of science
2549:22:24, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
2461:20:31, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
2440:22:03, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
2426:21:40, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
2417:21:01, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
2399:20:49, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
2387:21:33, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
2364:20:40, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
2345:20:25, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
2326:20:21, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
2295:04:02, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
2284:03:32, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
2270:02:33, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
2260:02:16, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
2238:02:01, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
2228:01:23, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
2210:00:41, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
2184:00:20, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
2169:00:18, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
2087:14:57, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
2072:00:08, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
2061:22:36, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
2047:22:36, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
2027:00:18, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
2009:00:10, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
1960:22:29, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
1941:21:05, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
1927:But the Cartwright article
1921:20:35, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
1904:20:35, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
1884:22:40, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
1871:20:35, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
1859:20:21, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
1832:20:19, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
1807:20:00, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
1793:19:41, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
1779:19:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
1765:13:23, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
1753:00:43, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
1736:17:02, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
1717:15:52, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
1618:00:04, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
1604:18:29, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
1559:16:18, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
1525:movement. Also there is an
1508:15:45, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
1404:15:45, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
1378:23:58, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
1360:15:20, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
1335:15:22, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
1322:15:00, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
1312:14:57, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
1293:14:56, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
1278:13:00, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
1246:05:29, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
1211:04:59, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
1197:04:11, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
1162:13:14, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
973:14:09, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
963:20:50, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
925:10:41, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
778:history of science articles
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
3256:
2966:United States Census, 1840
933:10:48, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
887:project's importance scale
798:project's importance scale
683:project's importance scale
439:project's importance scale
334:project's importance scale
3156:21:15, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
3135:04:07, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
3119:00:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
918:July 9, 2005 16:49 (UTC)
880:
867:African diaspora articles
829:
791:
737:History of science portal
714:
676:
609:
562:WikiProject United States
445:
432:
365:
327:
264:
243:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
2645:to the section to which
1984:Knowledge:Citing sources
1948:Knowledge:Citing sources
1527:Category:Anti-psychiatry
2431:Truly, I thank you. --
2313:? Does this imply that
1769:
2881:
2244:Dysaethesia Aethiopica
2194:Dysaethesia Aethiopica
1909:Alternative suggestion
1816:Alternative suggestion
1545:
1531:Category:Pseudoscience
1488:Category:Pseudoscience
1475:New York Times article
1457:by noted psychiatrist
1445:Appearance in a review
1181:
640:WikiProject Psychology
279:WikiProject Skepticism
225:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
3013:Amputation of the toe
2836:Samuel A. Cartwright.
2627:You should stop. --
1696:I removed the POV tag
1529:. Such categories as
1371:Articles for Deletion
1095:The Mismeasure of Man
555:|class=|importance=}}
410:United States History
357:United States History
100:Neutral point of view
1706:Samuel A. Cartwright
1414:First appearance in
1409:Some sources to add?
388:United States portal
105:No original research
3041:page, which says, "
2703:Oh, is this why my
2596:Category:Psychiatry
1492:Category:Psychiatry
1481:Another book result
663:psychology articles
314:Skepticism articles
2554:Another idea from
1431:on the history of
769:History of Science
750:history of science
706:History of Science
231:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
3096:
2987:Scientific racism
1393:Psychiatric abuse
1345:User:Cyborg Ninja
1119:Dubious toe claim
910:In discussion on
901:
900:
897:
896:
893:
892:
808:
807:
804:
803:
693:
692:
689:
688:
632:Psychology portal
588:
587:
584:
583:
580:
579:
576:
575:
344:
343:
340:
339:
211:
210:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
3247:
3091:
2871:
2680:
2633:
2437:
2414:
2361:
2323:
2305:Did the artist,
2156:
2155:
2141:
2097:Have a look at:
2024:
1957:
1918:
1901:
1750:
1714:
1556:
1401:
1357:
1332:
1309:
1275:
1194:
869:
868:
865:
862:
859:
858:African diaspora
849:African diaspora
838:
831:
830:
825:
821:African diaspora
817:
810:
780:
779:
776:
773:
770:
739:
734:
733:
732:
723:
716:
715:
710:
702:
695:
665:
664:
661:
658:
655:
634:
629:
628:
627:
618:
611:
610:
605:
597:
590:
565:
556:
487:
480:
479:
447:
421:
420:
417:
414:
411:
390:
385:
384:
383:
374:
367:
366:
361:
353:
346:
316:
315:
312:
309:
306:
273:
266:
265:
260:
252:
245:
228:
222:
221:
213:
199:. The result of
192:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
3255:
3254:
3250:
3249:
3248:
3246:
3245:
3244:
3160:
3159:
3143:
3106:
3015:
2962:John C. Calhoun
2884:
2867:
2815:
2676:
2629:
2625:
2537:
2433:
2410:
2357:
2319:
2315:Eastman Johnson
2307:Eastman Johnson
2303:
2301:Picture caption
2220:
2098:
2020:
1953:
1914:
1897:
1772:
1746:
1710:
1698:
1625:haematoma auris
1552:
1523:Anti-psychiatry
1411:
1397:
1389:
1353:
1348:
1328:
1305:
1301:
1286:Anti-Psychiatry
1271:
1258:
1190:
1173:
1121:
1088:(Liz Fletcher)
1033:
957:Anti-Psychiatry
953:
950:Anti-Psychiatry
908:
866:
863:
860:
857:
856:
823:
777:
774:
771:
768:
767:
735:
730:
728:
708:
662:
659:
656:
653:
652:
630:
625:
623:
603:
572:
559:
550:
478:
418:
415:
412:
409:
408:
386:
381:
379:
359:
313:
310:
307:
304:
303:
258:
229:on Knowledge's
226:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
3253:
3251:
3243:
3242:
3237:
3232:
3227:
3222:
3217:
3212:
3207:
3202:
3197:
3192:
3187:
3182:
3177:
3172:
3162:
3161:
3142:
3139:
3138:
3137:
3105:
3102:
3101:
3100:
3099:
3098:
3097:
3082:All the best:
3080:
3077:
3074:
3014:
3011:
3010:
3009:
3008:
3007:
3006:
3005:
2978:
2977:
2976:
2975:
2950:
2949:
2917:
2916:
2910:
2904:
2898:
2883:
2882:DeBow's Review
2880:
2879:
2878:
2877:
2876:
2838:
2837:
2834:
2833:Drapetomania +
2831:
2814:
2811:
2810:
2809:
2808:
2807:
2806:
2805:
2804:
2803:
2766:
2765:
2764:
2763:
2762:
2761:
2746:
2745:
2744:
2743:
2717:
2716:
2700:
2699:
2688:
2687:
2686:
2685:
2666:
2665:
2624:
2621:
2620:
2619:
2609:
2608:
2607:
2606:
2605:
2536:
2533:
2532:
2531:
2530:
2529:
2528:
2527:
2503:
2502:
2501:
2500:
2482:
2481:
2466:
2465:
2464:
2463:
2451:
2450:
2449:
2448:
2447:
2446:
2445:
2444:
2443:
2442:
2367:
2366:
2348:
2347:
2302:
2299:
2298:
2297:
2277:
2276:
2275:
2274:
2273:
2272:
2219:
2216:
2215:
2214:
2213:
2212:
2187:
2186:
2172:
2171:
2158:
2157:
2094:
2093:
2092:
2091:
2090:
2089:
2064:
2063:
2050:
2049:
2036:
2035:
2034:
2033:
2032:
2031:
2030:
2029:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1990:
1989:
1988:
1974:
1973:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1969:
1934:DeBow's Review
1924:
1923:
1906:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1862:
1861:
1835:
1834:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1797:
1796:
1771:
1768:
1758:
1757:
1756:
1755:
1739:
1738:
1697:
1694:
1621:
1620:
1562:
1561:
1547:
1546:
1539:
1410:
1407:
1388:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1347:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1300:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1257:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1200:
1199:
1172:
1169:
1167:
1165:
1164:
1139:
1138:
1133:It seems like
1131:
1128:
1120:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1073:
1072:
1032:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
989:
988:
987:
986:
976:
975:
952:
947:
945:Sept 30, 2005
935:
934:
907:
905:Categorization
902:
899:
898:
895:
894:
891:
890:
883:Mid-importance
879:
873:
872:
870:
853:the discussion
839:
827:
826:
824:Midāimportance
818:
806:
805:
802:
801:
794:Low-importance
790:
784:
783:
781:
741:
740:
724:
712:
711:
709:Lowāimportance
703:
691:
690:
687:
686:
679:Low-importance
675:
669:
668:
666:
649:the discussion
636:
635:
619:
607:
606:
604:Lowāimportance
598:
586:
585:
582:
581:
578:
577:
574:
573:
571:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
557:
544:
536:
519:
506:
491:
489:
488:
477:
476:
471:
466:
461:
455:
452:
451:
443:
442:
435:Low-importance
431:
425:
424:
422:
405:the discussion
392:
391:
375:
363:
362:
360:Lowāimportance
354:
342:
341:
338:
337:
330:Low-importance
326:
320:
319:
317:
300:the discussion
274:
262:
261:
259:Lowāimportance
253:
241:
240:
234:
223:
209:
208:
201:the discussion
193:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3252:
3241:
3238:
3236:
3233:
3231:
3228:
3226:
3223:
3221:
3218:
3216:
3213:
3211:
3208:
3206:
3203:
3201:
3198:
3196:
3193:
3191:
3188:
3186:
3183:
3181:
3178:
3176:
3173:
3171:
3168:
3167:
3165:
3158:
3157:
3153:
3149:
3140:
3136:
3132:
3128:
3123:
3122:
3121:
3120:
3116:
3112:
3103:
3094:
3090:
3089:
3086:
3081:
3078:
3075:
3072:
3068:
3063:
3062:
3061:
3058:
3054:
3053:
3052:
3051:
3048:
3044:
3040:
3035:
3031:
3029:
3023:
3020:
3012:
3004:
3000:
2996:
2992:
2991:Malik Shabazz
2988:
2984:
2983:
2982:
2981:
2980:
2979:
2974:
2971:
2967:
2963:
2959:
2954:
2953:
2952:
2951:
2948:
2944:
2940:
2936:
2935:Malik Shabazz
2931:
2927:
2926:
2925:
2924:
2921:
2914:
2911:
2908:
2905:
2902:
2899:
2896:
2893:
2892:
2891:
2889:
2875:
2872:
2870:
2864:
2863:
2862:
2859:
2854:
2853:
2852:
2851:
2848:
2843:
2842:
2835:
2832:
2829:
2828:
2827:
2826:
2822:
2820:
2812:
2802:
2798:
2794:
2790:
2789:Malik Shabazz
2786:
2782:
2778:
2774:
2773:
2772:
2771:
2770:
2769:
2768:
2767:
2759:
2756:
2752:
2751:
2750:
2749:
2748:
2747:
2742:
2738:
2734:
2730:
2729:Malik Shabazz
2726:
2721:
2720:
2719:
2718:
2714:
2711:
2706:
2702:
2701:
2698:
2695:
2690:
2689:
2684:
2681:
2679:
2673:
2670:
2669:
2668:
2667:
2664:
2660:
2656:
2652:
2651:Malik Shabazz
2648:
2644:
2640:
2639:
2638:
2637:
2634:
2632:
2622:
2618:
2615:
2610:
2604:
2601:
2597:
2593:
2588:
2587:
2585:
2582:
2578:
2577:
2576:
2573:
2569:
2565:
2561:
2557:
2553:
2552:
2551:
2550:
2547:
2542:
2534:
2526:
2522:
2518:
2513:
2509:
2508:
2507:
2506:
2505:
2504:
2499:
2496:
2493:
2490:
2486:
2485:
2484:
2483:
2480:
2476:
2472:
2468:
2467:
2462:
2459:
2455:
2454:
2453:
2452:
2441:
2438:
2436:
2430:
2429:
2427:
2424:
2420:
2419:
2418:
2415:
2413:
2407:
2403:
2402:
2400:
2397:
2393:
2392:
2391:
2390:
2389:
2388:
2384:
2380:
2376:
2375:Malik Shabazz
2372:
2365:
2362:
2360:
2354:
2353:Malik Shabazz
2350:
2349:
2346:
2342:
2338:
2334:
2333:Malik Shabazz
2330:
2329:
2328:
2327:
2324:
2322:
2316:
2312:
2308:
2300:
2296:
2293:
2288:
2287:
2286:
2285:
2282:
2271:
2268:
2263:
2262:
2261:
2257:
2253:
2249:
2248:Malik Shabazz
2245:
2241:
2240:
2239:
2236:
2232:
2231:
2230:
2229:
2226:
2217:
2211:
2207:
2203:
2199:
2198:Malik Shabazz
2195:
2191:
2190:
2189:
2188:
2185:
2182:
2177:
2174:
2173:
2170:
2167:
2163:
2160:
2159:
2154:
2150:
2147:
2144:
2140:
2136:
2132:
2129:
2126:
2123:
2120:
2117:
2114:
2111:
2108:
2104:
2101:
2100:Find sources:
2096:
2095:
2088:
2085:
2080:
2077:
2076:
2075:
2074:
2073:
2070:
2066:
2065:
2062:
2059:
2055:
2052:
2051:
2048:
2045:
2041:
2038:
2037:
2028:
2025:
2023:
2017:
2012:
2011:
2010:
2007:
2003:
1999:
1998:
1997:
1996:
1995:
1994:
1986:
1985:
1980:
1979:
1978:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1967:
1963:
1962:
1961:
1958:
1956:
1950:
1949:
1944:
1943:
1942:
1939:
1935:
1930:
1926:
1925:
1922:
1919:
1917:
1910:
1907:
1905:
1902:
1900:
1894:
1891:
1890:
1885:
1882:
1877:
1874:
1873:
1872:
1869:
1864:
1863:
1860:
1857:
1852:
1848:
1844:
1840:
1837:
1836:
1833:
1829:
1825:
1821:
1820:Malik Shabazz
1817:
1814:
1813:
1808:
1805:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1794:
1791:
1786:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1777:
1767:
1766:
1763:
1754:
1751:
1749:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1740:
1737:
1733:
1729:
1725:
1724:Malik Shabazz
1721:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1715:
1713:
1707:
1702:
1695:
1693:
1692:
1688:
1684:
1679:
1677:
1672:
1671:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1656:
1653:
1650:
1647:
1644:
1641:
1638:
1635:
1632:
1629:
1626:
1619:
1616:
1612:
1611:Thomjackobsen
1609:I agree with
1608:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1602:
1598:
1594:
1590:
1585:
1581:
1577:
1574:
1569:
1566:
1560:
1557:
1555:
1549:
1548:
1544:
1540:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1524:
1520:
1516:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1493:
1489:
1484:
1482:
1478:
1476:
1472:
1470:
1466:
1462:
1460:
1456:
1452:
1448:
1446:
1442:
1440:
1436:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1424:
1420:
1418:
1417:
1408:
1406:
1405:
1402:
1400:
1394:
1386:
1383:
1379:
1376:
1372:
1368:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1358:
1356:
1346:
1342:
1336:
1333:
1331:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1320:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1310:
1308:
1298:
1294:
1291:
1287:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1276:
1274:
1268:
1267:Wilhelm Wundt
1262:
1255:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1234:Malik Shabazz
1231:
1227:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1212:
1209:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1198:
1195:
1193:
1187:
1183:
1182:
1180:
1176:
1170:
1168:
1163:
1160:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1149:
1144:
1136:
1132:
1129:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1101:
1096:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1052:
1048:
1043:
1042:
1039:
1030:
1020:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1000:
995:
994:
993:
992:
991:
990:
984:
980:
979:
978:
977:
974:
971:
970:86.135.181.94
966:
965:
964:
962:
958:
951:
948:
946:
944:
940:
932:
928:
927:
926:
924:
919:
917:
913:
906:
903:
888:
884:
878:
875:
874:
871:
854:
850:
846:
845:
840:
837:
833:
832:
828:
822:
819:
816:
812:
799:
795:
789:
786:
785:
782:
765:
764:
759:
755:
751:
747:
746:
738:
727:
725:
722:
718:
717:
713:
707:
704:
701:
697:
684:
680:
674:
671:
670:
667:
650:
646:
642:
641:
633:
622:
620:
617:
613:
612:
608:
602:
599:
596:
592:
563:
558:
554:
549:
548:
546:
545:
543:
541:
537:
535:
531:
528:
526:
525:
520:
518:
515:
513:
512:
507:
505:
502:
500:
499:
494:
493:
490:
486:
482:
481:
475:
472:
470:
467:
465:
462:
460:
457:
456:
454:
453:
449:
448:
444:
440:
436:
430:
427:
426:
423:
406:
402:
398:
397:
389:
378:
376:
373:
369:
368:
364:
358:
355:
352:
348:
335:
331:
325:
322:
321:
318:
301:
297:
293:
292:pseudohistory
289:
288:pseudoscience
285:
281:
280:
275:
272:
268:
267:
263:
257:
254:
251:
247:
242:
238:
232:
224:
220:
215:
214:
206:
202:
198:
194:
191:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
3144:
3107:
3083:
3057:Cyborg Ninja
3047:Thomjakobsen
3042:
3036:
3032:
3027:
3024:
3016:
2970:Thomjakobsen
2929:
2920:Thomjakobsen
2918:
2885:
2868:
2858:Thomjakobsen
2847:Cyborg Ninja
2844:
2840:
2839:
2824:
2823:
2816:
2776:
2704:
2694:Cyborg Ninja
2677:
2646:
2643:you proposed
2642:
2630:
2626:
2614:Cyborg Ninja
2600:Thomjakobsen
2594:rather than
2572:Thomjakobsen
2546:Cyborg Ninja
2538:
2511:
2458:Steve Dufour
2434:
2411:
2368:
2358:
2320:
2311:drapetomania
2304:
2292:Steve Dufour
2281:Cyborg Ninja
2278:
2267:Thomjakobsen
2235:Thomjakobsen
2225:Cyborg Ninja
2221:
2181:Steve Dufour
2176:Action taken
2175:
2161:
2148:
2142:
2134:
2127:
2121:
2115:
2109:
2099:
2084:Cyborg Ninja
2078:
2069:Steve Dufour
2058:Cyborg Ninja
2053:
2044:Cyborg Ninja
2039:
2021:
2016:Drapetomania
2006:Thomjakobsen
1982:
1965:
1954:
1946:
1938:Thomjakobsen
1933:
1928:
1915:
1908:
1898:
1892:
1881:Cyborg Ninja
1875:
1868:Steve Dufour
1856:Thomjakobsen
1846:
1842:
1838:
1815:
1804:Steve Dufour
1784:
1776:Steve Dufour
1773:
1759:
1747:
1711:
1703:
1699:
1680:
1673:
1660:
1657:
1654:
1651:
1648:
1645:
1642:
1639:
1636:
1633:
1622:
1615:Cyborg Ninja
1601:Thomjakobsen
1599:psychiatry.
1596:
1586:
1582:
1578:
1572:
1570:
1567:
1563:
1553:
1542:
1519:Thomas Szasz
1513:Please read
1505:Thomjakobsen
1485:
1479:
1473:
1468:
1463:
1459:Thomas Szasz
1454:
1449:
1443:
1437:
1433:fugue states
1429:Another book
1427:
1423:Another book
1421:
1415:
1412:
1398:
1390:
1375:Cyborg Ninja
1370:
1366:
1354:
1349:
1329:
1319:Cyborg Ninja
1306:
1302:
1290:Cyborg Ninja
1272:
1263:
1259:
1230:drapetomania
1208:Cyborg Ninja
1191:
1186:Drapetomania
1178:
1174:
1166:
1159:Steve Dufour
1142:
1140:
1134:
1122:
1099:
1074:
1044:
1034:
1031:Significance
954:
936:
920:
909:
882:
842:
793:
761:
754:project page
743:
678:
638:
539:
538:
522:
521:
509:
508:
496:
495:
434:
394:
329:
277:
237:WikiProjects
204:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
25:Drapetomania
19:This is the
3104:Conjectural
3071:this source
3067:this source
3019:description
2492:Will Beback
2125:free images
1369:stands for
1078:Lizfletcher
1051:Will Beback
939:Draptomania
148:free images
31:not a forum
3164:Categories
3088:Farmbrough
2647:you linked
2556:Phrenology
2541:Phrenology
2539:I'm using
1451:This piece
1416:The Lancet
1226:psychiatry
1105:Mirmalchik
1038:jnestorius
758:discussion
654:Psychology
645:Psychology
601:Psychology
305:Skepticism
296:skepticism
256:Skepticism
2785:your name
1683:EverSince
1662:EverSince
1062:EverSince
923:The Anome
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
3127:AnonMoos
2999:contribs
2943:contribs
2869:Mattisse
2797:contribs
2737:contribs
2678:Mattisse
2659:contribs
2631:Mattisse
2435:Mattisse
2412:Mattisse
2383:contribs
2371:Mattisse
2359:Mattisse
2341:contribs
2321:Mattisse
2256:contribs
2206:contribs
2022:Mattisse
1955:Mattisse
1916:Mattisse
1899:Mattisse
1828:contribs
1748:Mattisse
1732:contribs
1712:Mattisse
1554:Mattisse
1399:Mattisse
1355:Mattisse
1330:Mattisse
1307:Mattisse
1273:Mattisse
1242:contribs
1192:Mattisse
1019:Paladuck
197:deletion
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
3111:Nicmart
2928:Caplan
2755:SEWilco
2710:SEWilco
2581:SEWilco
2423:SEWilco
2396:SEWilco
2131:WPĀ refs
2119:scholar
2079:Comment
2040:Comment
1893:Support
1876:Comment
1790:SEWilco
1597:current
1453:in the
1148:ĪĪ½Ī±ĻĻĪÆĪ±
983:Willmcw
961:Willmcw
943:Cheridy
931:Willmcw
916:Willmcw
885:on the
796:on the
681:on the
511:Infobox
498:Cleanup
464:history
437:on the
332:on the
284:science
227:C-class
154:WPĀ refs
142:scholar
2930:et al.
2888:Vol XI
2777:oppose
2705:Oppose
2517:WaldoJ
2471:WaldoJ
2166:Addhoc
2162:Oppose
2103:Google
2054:Oppose
1839:Oppose
1785:Oppose
1762:Addhoc
1593:Bedlam
1100:within
999:Pariah
233:scale.
126:Google
3028:cause
2913:p.504
2907:p.331
2901:p.184
2146:JSTOR
2107:books
2002:WP:OR
1966:don't
1674:p.s.
1076:made.
540:Other
524:Stubs
474:purge
469:watch
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
3152:talk
3141:Tone
3131:talk
3115:talk
3085:Rich
3039:this
2995:Talk
2939:Talk
2895:p.64
2793:Talk
2781:diff
2733:Talk
2725:diff
2655:Talk
2521:talk
2489:Ā·:Ā·
2475:talk
2379:Talk
2337:Talk
2252:Talk
2202:Talk
2139:FENS
2113:news
1851:here
1845:and
1824:Talk
1728:Talk
1687:talk
1666:talk
1499:and
1465:Here
1439:This
1238:Talk
1143:were
1109:talk
1082:talk
1066:talk
1049:". -
459:edit
294:and
205:keep
203:was
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
2558:is
2495:Ā·:Ā·
2153:TWL
1367:AfD
1135:all
877:Mid
788:Low
673:Low
429:Low
324:Low
176:TWL
3166::
3154:)
3133:)
3117:)
3001:)
2997:|
2945:)
2941:|
2799:)
2795:|
2739:)
2735:|
2661:)
2657:|
2598:.
2586:)
2570:.
2523:)
2477:)
2428:)
2401:)
2385:)
2381:|
2343:)
2339:|
2258:)
2254:|
2208:)
2204:|
2133:)
1964:I
1929:is
1830:)
1826:|
1788:(
1734:)
1730:|
1689:)
1678::
1668:)
1550:--
1533:,
1483:.
1351:--
1244:)
1240:|
1111:)
1084:)
1068:)
560:{{
551:{{
532:,
290:,
286:,
156:)
54:;
3150:(
3129:(
3113:(
3095:.
2993:(
2937:(
2791:(
2760:)
2731:(
2715:)
2708:(
2653:(
2519:(
2473:(
2377:(
2335:(
2250:(
2200:(
2149:Ā·
2143:Ā·
2135:Ā·
2128:Ā·
2122:Ā·
2116:Ā·
2110:Ā·
2105:(
1822:(
1795:)
1726:(
1685:(
1664:(
1236:(
1146:ā
1107:(
1080:(
1064:(
889:.
800:.
766:.
685:.
542::
527::
514::
501::
441:.
336:.
239::
207:.
172:Ā·
166:Ā·
158:Ā·
151:Ā·
145:Ā·
139:Ā·
133:Ā·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
