Talk:Economic Freedom Fighters

1567:

not my opinion but theirs) you did a dance to explain why you felt it was acceptable to accuse EFF of hating white people but not AWB of hating black people, despite both pages having sources that alleges such. Specifically referencing legal systems, which are themselves bias. Playing devil's advocate for a bit: The US legal system determined Kyle Rittenhouse and George Zimmerman acted in self defense, so why is it acceptable to have sections on top of sections explaining why some people think the ruling is bullshit or a miscarraige of justice? Why do their articles use sources that accuse them of being perpetrators or racists? The legal system also determined the murder of Emmett Till was justified, why does the entire Emmett Till article paint him as a victim of racism?

1750:

includes sources written by historians and political scientists as well as news outlets and even (in cases like this) the subjects supporters and detractors. Indeed we already have at least one South African political scientist who has written an entire paper on why the EFF should rather be classified as "neo-fascist." I have no objection to removing (or keeping) the "anti-white ideology" description so long as there are good citations for it and, should it be included, is well contextualized. All I was doing was trying to get clarity on what you were saying whilst pointing some problems with what you were saying and not "ignore your points." Please don't jump to conclusions. --

1262:

news media outlets, their characterisations of the EFF need to be treated in that context. The point is not about denying far-left elements of the EFF, but rather, that there are more than simply far-left elements to the EFF, that it spans a spectrum of left to far-left, and to use Knowledge's voice to characterise the EFF as simply far-left is inaccurate as it is not something reflected in the literature. FWIW - some of the same media sources above *not* using far-left:

286: 265: 397: 370: 296: 407: 203: 522: 501: 2458: 532: 234: 473: 1616:" That IP was blocked from Knowledge from an uninvolved admin precisely for their disruptive antics. The suggestion that pointing out a personal attack on someone (which was determined to be a personal attack by an uninvolved admin) is somehow a manifestation of me derailing conversations, is nonsense and does a great deal of damage to your own credibility. 1062:

found for far-left on top of these. I think the consensus on reporting has clearly shifted since 2015 and the party is not the same as it was then. The clear vast majority of sources now refer to the party as far-left and I don't think we should be retaining some 7-year-old sources of what was rather than what is to define how the party is now.

1436:. To answer your point on this, I shall quote parts of my answer to November 2021 discussion: "We don't make a judgement of what takes place on this article, by what takes place on a different article, that's not how Knowledge works. But if you believe that racism should be included in the ideological section of the 1804:

Because there is a lot of debate on The EFF's political position being either Far-Left or Far-Right, and the Ideology section having both historically and contemporarily Left-wing and Right-wing positions. I think that the best thing to do would be to remove the "Political position" section, like how

1585:

It is not our job to read our opinions into an article, our responsibility as editors is simply to take what reliable sources say on a particular topic. Your opinion & my opinion(s) on particular topics are actually fundamentally irrelevant beyond what the reliable sources say. You may be believe

1361:

Complicating matters further on this issue are the sources arguing that the EFF is a fascist party that has right wing tenancies. There is even a line of argument by a minority of commentators in South Africa that the EFF is in fact a right wing party, or at least a crypto-right wing party. I haven't

1346:

is well understood as a newspaper of the free-market right with large dollops of (right-)libertarian sympathies when it comes to individual behaviour. I never said these were invalid because of their political worldview, I simply noted that those sources' worldview colours their understanding of the

1076:

I'll reiterate: using contemporaneous media sources is a poor substitute for specialist academic literature (and comparing the two on the basis of publication date is equally problematic especially since many of the sources "discounted" deal with the ideological origins of EFF in the ANCYL). I'd also

865:

Came here via a bot-announcement. I'm generally not comfortable using contemporaneous media sources when academic literature from specialists is available. The problem this RFC highlights is the EFF's political eclecticism (although no less than the ANC's or the SACP's). Trying to reduce the EFF to a

1982:

I agree that, as things currently stand, the terms "anti-white racism" and "anti-indian racism" should be removed from the infobox as they are accusations and not official EFF policy. Its better left in the Controversy section where accounts of the accusations of this are recorded and the reader can

1947:

That is not in any way to say that these citations have no place in the article whatsoever, in fact, the point they are getting at is essential to discuss, but the infobox is not the place for them and the citations do not substantially back up the characterization of the party as having "anti-white

1749:

Whether the sources were written by historians or not is irrelevent. I would argue that articles written by political scientists would be better but that is also aside the point. The point is that Knowledge tries to distill and summarise the general public consensus on what is true on an issue, that

1566:

As for "Derailing" you first accused an IP of making personal attacks merely by raising his opinion on the issue. When another user argues the "Anti-white racism" and "Black supremacy" labels are inaccurate since EFF rejects the accusaitons, while orgs like AWB would accept it (The latter (BS label)

1477:

South Africa has ridiculous fringe groups on both sides, and to accuse the entire organization of hating white people because of the statements of a few of its members is odd. Again, considering my "Opinion", it's not ridiculous to assume other people's negative views of black people, perhaps yours,

1409:

I see other articles (Such as AfriForum) rather than calling them "Neo nazis" and "WHite supremacists", it states "They are accused of these things" and then list sources and excerpts to explain why they are accused. Rather than stating an opinion as fact, it states the opinion is popular and proves

1405:

Even considering that, why are we condemming the opinions of a group of people who have been terrorized and violated by white british colonists for hundreds of years? It is not "Racist" to hold distain for a group of people who come to your country to harm you. Profesionally speaking, we are overdue

1705:

I want to add my voice against the "anti-white" ideology section. The first source used is from John Campbell, who came from a career in State Department as a Reagan appointee. I don't think this counts as scholarly and detacted. The second source is a white South African, the paper concerns itself

1667:

I haven't "selectively decided" anything, the situation is that we've got some things included on the page that are backed-up by a large number (and variety) of reliable sources. There are some users who disagree with the inclusion of this stuff on the page, and instead of providing a justification

1555:

In South Africa, you can be convicted for "Hate Speech" simply for referring to its own history. History of genocide and colonialism committed by white british colonists against its black natives. Julius Malema is convicted every 5 months merely for referencing history. Many of his charges, such as

1532:

As for the suggestion that the racial prejudice expressed is simply confined to statements of individual members of the party, I would remind you that one of those individuals is Julius Malema, someone who has been convicted of hate speech in a post-Apartheid South African court. This is along with

1061:

all but one of those sources you provided fall foul of part of what I spoke of. They are all bar one from 2015, only two years after the party was established and 7 years ago from now. I have provided three non-media sources within the list of 15 reliable sources I provided and I'm sure more can be

696:

The two sources for left-wing were fairly shortly after the party was formed and less was known about it and it had less time to develop. The sources for this claim are from 2015 and 2016. In comparison since there are far, far more sources that call the party far-left. This includes those that are

1720:

Are you talking about the section or the mention in the infobox? The section does not mention any sources written by John Campbell. It seems like you are instead talking about the mention in the infobox instead of an entire section. Also rejecting sources only because they are written by a certain

1562:

The sources used to accuse EFF of hating white people are consistently and by multiple users shown to either be NPOV or unreliable, whoever is forcing it in might have done so in bad faith, and we as future editors are simply unaware of it and just accepting it as status quo, which is also against

1481:

All reliable sources can confirm are statements made by individual members that could be percieve as "Anti-white" and were accused of being such. I would using better wording, or suggest removing "Anti-white racism" from ideology, and renaming the body section detailing statments as something like

1397:

Based on my personal opinions and whatever opinions I can infer from other users, this is hellishly opinionated. I also doubt most of us are even from South Africa, so none of us truly know whats going on, even then, many SA users may be white rather than black so it is one sided. I still think it

1261:

Which sources are more reliable and detailed? Helper201 posted only three academic sources, none of which are actually discussions about the EFF. I've posted nine academic sources which are all specific studies of the EFF. The Economist, Foreign Affairs, The Daily Telegraph are all right of centre

1637:

I understand what you mean about reliable sources but I don't understand how this allows you to selectively decide what stays based on your opinion while squandering the opinions and educated assertations of others. I have also never said assertation = fact, I just addressed people had said these

1593:

Apart from you, two users have made claims about the supposed NPOV of the article, one of those users made the claim 1 day after the official founding date of the EFF (27 July 2013), that is long before the sources now on the page had ever been written. The other person who made such a claim, was

1644:

And I dont accept your accusation of me not being credible. That user who was mentioned by the IP saw what was said about him and decided for himself it was a personal attack, after you haf jump ahead to brand it as such to paint him as a bad person. Completely ingoring their arguement. You only

1473:

From the talk page, it appears that "Anti-White racism" was not in the ideology section for about 7 years until you included it. And everytime someone questioned its inclusion you arrived to derail the conversation and justify it, repeatedly force it back in whenever it was removed. All of these

2411:

There is reason for doubt about their classification, yes. That is why I ask for non-Israeli sources to see if there is a wider coverage of the EFF being antisemitic. It is load and clear that the EFF is creepy but the article itself does not state that the EFF is antisemitic. It is just in the

1663:

You didn't explicitly say he was a victim, but you did suggest that Malema is somehow unfairly prosecuted for hate speech for simply to 'referring to South Africa's history'. I don't consider it a stretch of the English language or a misrepresentation of what you've said, to point out that what

1174:

the main research question guiding this analysis is: Could the EFF have led to a shift wherein the ANC and DA became more populist in their political rhetoric and discourse? The research thus focuses on the populist party's 'soft power' – its ability to make others choose to follow its example

1485:

Remove the "Ant-Black" racism section because the only example for it would actually be considered an actual incident of "Anti-White racism". Would you consider a white man/woman racist against white people of they made a social media account pretending to be a black men playing into age old

1619:

In answer to your questions about Kyle Rittenhouse, George Zimmerman, and Emmett Till, the answer is very simple: the articles are the way they are because of community consensus around what the reliable sources say. If you genuinely don't understand that, I'm happy to direct to Knowledge's

1536:

On Knowledge, we go by what the reliable sources say, and as far as I can tell, the reliable sources on the page currently support the inclusion of "Anti-white racism" (among others) featuring on the page and in the infobox. The suggestion we should not include them based fundamentally on

1963:

These topics are ESSENTIAL to discuss in this article but in accordance with Wikipedias NPOV policy and guidelines, they do not belong under the infobox section "ideology" and instead belong squarely in the section "Criticisms and controversies" subsection "Racial and ethnic prejudice".

2015:, looking at the page history, it seems that you're the one that keeps reverting to keep anti-white & anti-Indian racism in the infobox, as well as you being the original editor. Can you please stop reverting to defend your edit and achieve consensus before adding per 1570:

These are also opinions, but relevant opinions. You get my point. As I'm typing this I could reel back a bit. The idea of EFF being anti-white is just a relevant opinion, not an ideology or fact. So at best it should only remain as a relevant opinion held by some people.

2472:

The Jerusalem Post is considered reliable and neutral even with regard to Israel-related matters. However, in this instance, the source does not actually term the EFF anti-semitic—rather, this article on one press release is placed into the "antisemitism" category. Per

1296:"Mr Ramaphosa will have to navigate a domestic politics that on the right sees the Democratic Alliance rising in popularity – it now governs the country’s three most important cities – and on the left is dominated by the noisy populism of the Economic Freedom Fighters." 2210:

The sole source linked is from The Jerusalem Post and describes the EFF as being anti-Zionist, which would make the antisemitism descriptor to be inaccurate as the material of the source doesn't support the claim. An anti-Zionist descriptor would be more appropriate.

1943:

The same goes for the citation of a news article about someone filing a complaint or lawsuit to a SA court against the leader of the EFF accusing him of racism particularly given that as far as i can find, none of these complaints have resulted in any conclusions.

1135:

Another example might include the way in which the EFF harnessed the will of the #feesmustfall student movement, demonstrating a leftist politics which moved fluidly from championing the rights of mineworkers to supporting access to higher

841:

Not only is there more known about the party and it has developed and changed in the years since these sources, I also think the sheer weight of sources specifically stating far-left rather than left-wing means that to include left-wing is giving such a claim

1951:

This topic is clearly highly controversial. From a political perspective party opponents feel it's necessary to label it as such in order to discredit the party and party sympathizers do not agree with the characterization. As per the NPOV policy guideline,

1528:

Now, to accuse me of derailing conversations over its inclusion is unfair, and I would challenge you to point and explain how exactly I've derailed any conversations in this matter. I'm entitled to respond to discussions just as you (and any other editor)

1081:

are relevant here. I do not see any academic consensus that unequivocally regards the EFF as far-left; of course, media sources grounded in a world view of North Atlantic liberalism will struggle to define the EFF as anything but far-left. Regards,

1038:

90% accepted fact. It appears that that is the case for "far left". BTW a source saying "left" might consider them to be "far left" and use "left" to include that. I wrote "weak" because I didn't take the deep dive here to learn this 100%.

1455:

that is your opinion, which you are free to hold. However we go by what reliable sources say, and it is certainly not a fringe view amongst reliable sources to accuse the EFF of anti-white racism and by that matter, anti-Indian racism.

1956:"Avoid stating seriously contested assertions as facts. If different reliable sources make conflicting assertions about a matter, treat these assertions as opinions rather than facts, and do not present them as direct statements." 712: 2294:, of which you seemingly are asserting that they are not reliable (or in some way biased in their reporting) simply because they are an Israeli news publication; that does not seem to be a editing principle that is legitimate. 153: 1939:"Avoid stating opinions as facts. Usually, articles will contain information about the significant opinions that have been expressed about their subjects. However, these opinions should not be stated in Knowledge's voice." 2051:

Just please stop reverting and achieve consensus for your edits. Do I need to add the diffs of your adding the original text or your constant reversions? So far, I do appreciate you not reverting this time, so thank you.

718: 1901:

I want to expand on what I said, I support it so long as a section summarizing their publicly stated positions replaces it and there is a section describing the uncertainty around how to describe the party's political

2190:

Antizionism is not antisemitism and I propose that we immediately remove the tag of antisemitism from their ideology. On top of that the only source is the Jerusalem Post, a newspaper with an obvious pro-Israel bias.

1648:

But I feel like we can agree this is going nowhere. I don't think we should waste our energy with eachother since neither seem to budge. I said what I wanted to say and people will see this for a good decade or two.

724: 1886:

I support this as well, for every "far-left" citation there seems to also be a citation stating the party is "far-right". There is very clearly no public consensue on this issue and this should be reflected in the

1675:

As for the claim about anti-white racism not being an ideology, that's a topic of debate. However it is not unusual on Knowledge to include key ideological positions (like anti-White racism) in an infobox, and the

1482:"Anti-white statements made by members" since that is all that appears to be there. If similar conclusions can be made for "Anti-Indian racism" or antisemetism, do that as well. But we are not discussing that now. 2507:

If the Eoconomic Freedom Fighters were white and had the same views, they would be listed as a white-supremacist party. Why is the fact they're a black supremacist party being removed from the ideology section?

1597:

On the point about discussions, you and I are having a discussion right now about the subject matter. The fact that you and I are having said discussion does not pose a barrier to other users joining in.

1735:

You can ignore my points that the sources don't say that "the EFF has an anti white ideology" and that they're not historians if you choose. Yes, I'm talking about the infobox. It's filled with OC.

1835: 1650: 1572: 1493: 1414: 866:

single political current is somewhat misleading, but left-populism is clearly predominant, indicative of political positions stretching across a spectrum and hence why left to far-left is apposite.

646: 1444:

and put it in." and if you are complaining about a specific manifestation of racism being listed in the infobox: "what is your opinion about including anti-semitism in the ideology section of the

2524: 2509: 1775: 1590:, and you are free to believe that; however it is irrelevant to this subject unless you can provide some evidence (from reliable sources) that Malema is a victim for simply 'speaking the truth'. 1209:

Furthermore, it assumed a left-wing of the working-class approach to political, governance and human rights issues, which has conspicuously been missing in post-apartheid South African politics.

809: 2561: 2362:

You haven't provided any evidence that they are not neutral, you're just making an assertion. If you don't have evidence, do you have some specific policy guidance that you can point to?

1641:

I have also said some users posited the sources claming anti-white racism as an ideology were "Weak". Limiting my statement ot just POV to make it seem small and insignfigant is just bad.

883:

Fölscher, Marine; de Jager, Nicola; Nyenhuis, Robert (December 2021). "Populist parties shifting the political discourse? A case study of the Economic Freedom Fighters in South Africa".

789: 1672:-esque arguments (like you did earlier). Simply saying that something NPOV (or you pointing out that others have asserted NPOV), doesn't really mean anything without further engagement. 1492:

Other people are able to put their opinions in if they please, since more than just both of us were making these edits I feel like there should be more people discussing things here.

147: 2033:

Then I highly recommend you look back to 2017 where such things appear in the infobox. Furthermore, such 'accusations' in the infobox are perfectly legitimate, after all (and as

2724: 2272:

Usually it is. But an Israeli source calling an unfriendly organisation antisemitic is NOT reliable. So do you have any non-Israeli sources that claim the EFF is antisemitic?

1448:

page? The idea that somehow the EFF is the only political organisation with a page on Knowledge that mentions its racism in the ideology section, is just patently inaccurate."

1525:. While I don't agree with the 'Fascism' label per say in that particular case, the idea that I imposed such a mention of EFF's bigotry on the infobox is just not accurate. 194: 1394:

I just noticed that there are already a large chunk of people removing and re-adding "Anti-White Racism" as an ideology for the EFF. Right after I did it I realized this.

1486:

stereotypes claiming he wanted to assualt white women? That's esentially what the EFF councillor did, but pretending to be a white woman hating on black women. Allegedly.

1848:

Is this a bot? it has a weird username, its only contributions have been this and one other on the same day minutes apart, and it hasn't provided sources for its claim.

1654: 1576: 1497: 799: 44: 1328:

calling it centre-right. Not that even if either case were/is true that it would make these reliable sources any less valid as being used as citations in this context.

482: 380: 645:🤓 well idk bro maybe the fact that in infobox says it’s ultranationalist and racially nationalist socially while communist economically is literally a source itself 2729: 2066:

By all means, you can add the diffs and I shall highlight how far back the changes have gone. But you haven't answered the 'accusations' point, could you do so?

2699: 1289: 352: 342: 1556:

him singing "Shoot the Boer", are dropped as theyr aren't seen as hate speech by the legal system, but said charge is still included in the page as an example.

2601:

In their official publications, the EFF places support for Trotsky and his ideology, albeit with some criticisms. Can I add Trotskyism to the ideology info?

659:

This page can't use itself as a source. To call the party right-wing, you would need a source that describes the party as such. This is how Knowledge works.

1037:(Invited by the bot) IMO labeling (or in this case, more specific labeling by removal of "left") should only be used where it is truly informative of : --> 829: 2744: 2704: 1278:"With revolutionary rhetoric, bright red outfits and left-wing policies, the Economic Freedom Fighters have shaken up South Africa’s political landscape" 588: 578: 79: 1645:

addressed their arguement when another user came to repeat it. That is why I said you derailed. And you are now stuffing words into my mouth. Derailing.

1148:

Roberts, Benjamin (2019). "Economic Freedom Fighters: authoritarian or democratic contestant?". In Schulz-Herzenberg, Collette; Southall, Roger (eds.).

2240:

And do you think that the Jerusalem Post is a neutral source about this? Do we have other sources at hand about anti-zionism/anti-semitism of the EFF?

2719: 2714: 612:

It correct to define this party far-left or left wing? Is not more correct to say far-left/left-wing economically, and far-rifgt/right-wing socially?

463: 453: 2177:

Several events added fuel to the fire: the increasing popularity of Julius Malema's antiwhite political party, the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF)...

190: 2344:

I requested non-Israeli sources to prove that the EFF is widely regarded to be antisemitic. Not just by sources that are not neutral in this case.

1706:

with theater, the "antiwhite" sentence wasn't cited or explained, and it was such a throw away sentence that wasn't concerning itself with the EFF.

2749: 318: 2734: 2694: 1295: 1189:"The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) as a "super-sub" in the South African Parliament: Fostering Accountability in Organised Disruptive Chaos" 85: 1117:

Adams, Rachel (21 December 2018). "South Africa's social contract: the Economic Freedom Fighters and the rise of a new constituent power?".

2115:

according to some sources apparently reliable the EFF is racist, and I think it could be in the party's ideology, since it has references.

1445: 779: 660: 554: 2641: 1470:

I used a comparison in a previous dicussion because I am not an idiotic blind bat. I read the entire page before I decided to participate.

730: 1668:

of why we shouldn't include this reliably-sourced stuff on the page, they instead assert NPOV (without justification) or they tread into

750: 2739: 1265: 429: 168: 1839: 1489:

As for NDP, there are quite literally more than 3 dozen non-fringe sources accusing them of neo-nazism. Don't see how relevant that is.

1418: 759: 650: 2709: 2528: 2513: 1779: 309: 270: 135: 2565: 2034: 1347:

EFF and should not be considered as equal to sources from academic specialists whose work has been treated to peer review. Regards

678:

Proposal that we remove left-wing and simply keep far-left in the main text and in the infobox. Reasoning given in a post below.

2540:

It is a criticism of their actions and rhetoric which is why it is discussed in the section marked for criticisms of the party.

1925: 1402:

does not have "Anti-black racism" as an ideology, rather "White supremacy". Why not simply keep "Black supremacy" as a marker?

545: 506: 99: 30: 420: 375: 104: 20: 129: 1967:

As these topics are already covered about in their proper section, I will be removing both descriptions from the infobox.

1688: 939:"Institutional Renaissance or Populist Fandango? The Impact of the Economic Freedom Fighters on South Africa's Parliament" 74: 2490: 2482: 2397:

But that is not what you said, you said that because they were an Israeli organisation, their claims were not reliable.

1437: 1429: 1399: 245: 1862:

No, this is someone without a registered account. In such cases, the IP-address is show. In this case an IP6-address.

125: 65: 2258:

It's a reliable source, which is the most important thing. Do you reliable evidence to suggest they are not neutral?

1324:

is not centre-right. It’s cited on its page as being "radical centrist". There is also nothing cited on the page of

1271: 819: 202: 185: 1283: 2196: 2120: 175: 24: 213: 2668:

The infobox contains a number of ideologies that are sourced by the EEF's constitution. These are consequently

2101: 1170:

The Soft Power of Populist Politics: A Case Study of the Economic Freedom Fighters in the South African Context

2159:

Often explicitly antiwhite in its rhetoric, it would expropriate without compensation white-owned property...

664: 2290:

Could you point the policy that supports that editing decision? As far as I can see, The Jerusalem Post is a

2486: 2478: 2463: 1252: 910:

Phadi, Mosa (2 July 2020). "The Economic Freedom Fighters: rethinking Du Bois in a tale of reconstruction".

769: 109: 2116: 2226:

The source from the Jerusalem Post categorises the story as anti-semitism, you can see it on the page...

1634:

I never said Malema was a "Victim", I feel like you're trying to pass me off as a certain type of person.

1272:"President of South Africa's radical left-wing party, the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), Julius Malema" 2560:

The party is clearly driven by an anti-white racism. Why is such fact not mentioned within the article?

2216: 1342:

In spite of its own pronouncements, to be taken with a heavy dose of salt (as with any self-assertion),

251: 2642:

https://africasacountry.com/2013/11/julius-malemas-economic-freedom-fighters-and-the-south-african-left

1931:

Relying on the provided citations from John Campbell and Megan Lewis to make a FACTUAL CLAIM about the

141: 2419: 2386: 2351: 2319: 2279: 2247: 2192: 1869: 1474:

people cite unreliable fringe sources and "NPOV" (Basically opinionated bias) as a point of question.

1352: 1308: 1229: 1087: 1025: 2330:

The discussion is about the Jerusalem Post, I assume you don't have an answer to what I just asked?

2131: 1960:

Placing the terms "anti-white racism" and "anti-indian racism" is in clear violation of this policy

1533:

the numerous of allegations Fascistic behaviour in the party, which are covered by reliable sources.

1329: 1290:"the Economic Freedom Fighters, as a left-wing populist alternative to the increasingly decrepit ANC 1266:"The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), South Africa’s left-leaning and third-largest political party" 1193:

African Journal of Development Studies (formerly AFFRIKA Journal of Politics, Economics and Society)

1063: 847: 740: 679: 233: 2582: 2541: 2312:. When I checked it last night, I could only find Israeli sources for the antisemitism accusation. 2135: 2097: 1968: 1853: 1810: 1669: 1538: 1333: 1078: 1067: 1046: 851: 803: 683: 301: 161: 55: 553:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

428:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

317:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

2640:

1. "A movement which has set out a manifesto closer to an old Trotskyist transitional programme"

2586: 2545: 2057: 2024: 2002: 1972: 1825: 1740: 1711: 1248: 613: 218: 70: 962:"Populism and the Political Character of the Economic Freedom Fighters - a View from the Branch" 1428:

A discussion has been had on this multiple times, and interestingly the specific comparison to

2669: 2651: 2617: 2606: 1988: 1907: 1892: 1755: 1726: 1371: 1277: 973: 636: 51: 1156:...whether the EFF's brand of populist politics constitutes a challenge to liberal democracy. 2402: 2367: 2335: 2299: 2263: 2231: 2212: 2173:

Performing Whitely in the Postcolony: Afrikaners in South African Theatrical and Public Life

2071: 2042: 1696: 1683:

If you're going to make the claim that accusing another user (without evidence) of being a "

1625: 1546: 1461: 1200: 1126: 1003: 919: 892: 833: 617: 537: 215: 2672:

sources that should either be removed or replaced. Is there a reason to keep these here? —

2308:

I guess you do not have the sources I requested? We have to maintain a neutral article per

2096:

I don't think one could be a Neo-Stalinist while at the same time also being a Trotskyist.

2474: 2414: 2381: 2346: 2314: 2274: 2242: 1864: 1507: 1348: 1325: 1304: 1225: 1083: 1058: 1021: 793: 763: 412: 1188: 1677: 1406:

for better diction, if we NEED to include statements EFF heads make about white people.

1204: 2581:

That is addressed in the article in the section marked for criticisms and controversy.

2376: 2309: 2016: 1849: 1806: 1559:

This is where opinion bulge with "Fact" so I don't believe we shoud continue with that.

1518: 1441: 843: 773: 2680: 2655: 2628: 2610: 2590: 2569: 2549: 2532: 2517: 2494: 2425: 2406: 2392: 2371: 2357: 2339: 2325: 2303: 2285: 2267: 2253: 2235: 2220: 2200: 2139: 2124: 2105: 2075: 2061: 2046: 2028: 2006: 1992: 1976: 1911: 1896: 1875: 1857: 1843: 1829: 1814: 1783: 1759: 1744: 1730: 1715: 1700: 1658: 1629: 1580: 1550: 1501: 1465: 1433: 1422: 1375: 1356: 1337: 1312: 1256: 1233: 1091: 1071: 1050: 1029: 855: 687: 668: 654: 640: 621: 406: 396: 369: 2688: 2537:"Black supremacy" is not espoused by the organization itself and is not self evident. 2053: 2020: 1998: 1821: 1736: 1707: 1563:

wikipedia's rules. Hence why I am here to discuss it. With more people than just you.

1511: 1478:

might influence whether or not they beleive "Anti-white racism" is a valid inclusion.

1321: 783: 217: 943:

Verfassung und Recht in Übersee / Law and Politics in Africa, Asia and Latin America

285: 264: 2647: 2602: 2291: 2130:

We'd need some reliable evidence that racism is in-of-itself a political ideology.

1984: 1903: 1888: 1751: 1722: 1367: 734: 702: 632: 628: 314: 1506:

The tone you are taking in this matter is inappropriate, please be considerate of

923: 2620:

source. Ideally they should be described as Trotskyist by independent sources. —

1130: 2674: 2634: 2622: 2578:

That is a criticism and/or an accusation that you and others have for the party.

2398: 2363: 2331: 2295: 2259: 2227: 2067: 2038: 2012: 1692: 1621: 1611: 1542: 1457: 1363: 1588:

you can be convicted for "Hate Speech" simply for referring to its own history

896: 754: 527: 402: 291: 1594:

simply making an assertion; simply making an assertion does not make it true.

976: 1600:

As for the claim about me derailing a conversation, I have only highlighted

1274:

Council of Foreign Relations (publisher of Foreign Affairs), 5 February 2019

823: 550: 1149: 1664:

you've said suggests you believe him to be a victim of unfair prosecution.

1638:

things. why is their word suddenly irrelevant just because you dislike it?

1247:

Sources for 'far-left' appear to be more reliable and somewhat detailed.

991: 706: 425: 2646:

Alongside their own primary sources, this suggests they are Trotskyists

961: 938: 531: 521: 500: 1948:

racism" and "anti-indian racism" as part of the ideology of the party.

1007: 992:"The Economic Freedom Fighters - South Africa's turn towards populism?" 744: 1834:

No. Reliable sources provide ample reason to label the party Far-Left

1774:

It's much easier to admit that Knowledge has bias and no consistency.

1362:

yet seen any one argue yet that the party's ideology is an example of

2477:, this is not sufficient sourcing to label the EFF as anti-semitic. 472: 1614:" is one of the racists forwarding white supremacy over Knowledge. 810:

Squatters In Wine Country: South Africa Struggles With Land Reform

1928:, "Knowledge aims to describe disputes, but not engage in them." 1284:

South Africa's left-wing EFF leads latest anti-government protest

2037:) we put such things in the infobox all the time without issue. 1805:

it is with some other major political party's Knowledge pages.

1151:

Election 2019: change and stability in South Africa's democracy

751:

South Africa’s ruling ANC takes lead as vote counting continues

1521:, and Indians have been present in the infobox since at least 813: 697:

currently given on the main page plus some more examples here:

227: 219: 15: 703:

President Cyril Ramaphosa pledges 'new dawn' for South Africa

1620:

resources/policies which will help with your understanding.

1604:

on this talk page, and that was in relation to an IP with a

790:

South African municipal vote to gauge support for ruling ANC

713:

The Routledge Companion to Media Disinformation and Populism

471: 1517:

Mentioning/suggesting EFF's racial bigotry towards whites,

830:

South Africa’s local vote will gauge support for ruling ANC

780:

Why keeping Jacob Zuma as president is bad for South Africa

741:

South Africa's ANC calls top-level meeting on Zuma's future

2575:

The party is not "clearly driven by an anti-white racism".

731:

Young Africa: new wave of politicians challenges old guard

966:

Labour, Capital and Society / Travail, capital et société

2523:"The only white man you can trust is a dead white man." 1605: 1601: 1522: 1920:

The Infobox and Violation of Wikipedias policy of NPOV

1680:

says nothing about not including such things in there.

160: 2379:. But I have already asked input from other editors. 1721:

category (such as race) of people is... problematic.

1935:

of the EFF is in violation of the policy guideline;

549:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 424:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 313:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1685:...racist forwarding white supremacy over Knowledge 631:that claim the party as "far-right"/"right-wing". 2412:rubric antisemitism by choice of the newspaper. 1691:, I don't see how you can have any credibility. 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 1366:but I suspect that is only a matter of time. 174: 8: 800:Cecil Rhodes statue pulled down in Cape Town 2725:Unknown-importance political party articles 937:Calland, Richard; Seedat, Shameela (2015). 820:South Africa virus cases surge past 100,000 1541:-esque arguments, is just not legitimate. 495: 364: 259: 1187:Yende, Nsizwazonke E. (1 December 2021). 1154:. Konrad-Adenauer Stiftung. pp. 97–113. 770:Red is the color of opposition in Africa 760:How Far Can Populism Go in South Africa? 2145: 1836:2603:7000:75F0:1680:5CC4:A109:A9ED:5B1E 1651:2603:8080:F600:14E7:E108:76F7:94F5:D761 1573:2603:8080:F600:14E7:E108:76F7:94F5:D761 1494:2603:8080:F600:14E7:E108:76F7:94F5:D761 1415:2603:8080:F600:14E7:95FF:FDA8:9832:542D 1109: 875: 647:2600:8801:1187:7F00:65A1:F5CF:8721:9275 497: 366: 261: 231: 2525:2601:405:4881:B730:44F0:294D:FCC9:3623 2510:2601:405:4881:B730:44F0:294D:FCC9:3623 1776:2601:405:4881:B730:44F0:294D:FCC9:3623 1292:Foreign Affairs, January/February 2022 2730:Political parties task force articles 2562:2003:DA:C72A:3D00:F52E:ECD6:D6CF:F8C8 1453:it is not "Racist" to hold distain... 885:The Journal of Modern African Studies 7: 2700:Mid-importance South Africa articles 2157:. Indiana University Press. p. 187. 1390:Addressing "Anti-White racism" again 1172:(Masters). Stellenbosch University. 543:This article is within the scope of 418:This article is within the scope of 307:This article is within the scope of 2175:. University of Iowa Press. p. 62. 912:Review of African Political Economy 250:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 2206:Regarding Antisemitism description 327:Knowledge:WikiProject South Africa 14: 2745:Mid-importance socialism articles 2705:WikiProject South Africa articles 1398:should not be there. Since I see 990:Mbete, Sithembile (1 June 2015). 330:Template:WikiProject South Africa 2720:B-Class political party articles 2715:Mid-importance politics articles 2485:) 01:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC) 2456: 1678:political party infobox guidance 1410:why. Why not do the same here? 1035:Weak support of just "far left" 719:Social Changes in a Global World 530: 520: 499: 405: 395: 368: 294: 284: 263: 232: 201: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 2092:Neo-stalinists and trotskyists. 1926:Knowledge:Neutral point of view 1205:10.31920/2634-3649/2021/v11n4a3 1175:through influence, not threats. 583:This article has been rated as 563:Knowledge:WikiProject Socialism 458:This article has been rated as 347:This article has been rated as 2750:WikiProject Socialism articles 1376:13:33, 11 September 2022 (UTC) 1298:The Guardian, 18 December 2017 566:Template:WikiProject Socialism 438:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics 1: 2735:WikiProject Politics articles 2695:B-Class South Africa articles 2533:18:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC) 2518:18:45, 16 February 2024 (UTC) 2140:00:16, 30 December 2023 (UTC) 2125:20:41, 25 December 2023 (UTC) 2106:22:19, 11 November 2023 (UTC) 2076:00:45, 19 November 2023 (UTC) 2062:03:25, 18 November 2023 (UTC) 2047:15:24, 16 November 2023 (UTC) 2029:02:56, 16 November 2023 (UTC) 2007:07:20, 15 November 2023 (UTC) 1933:ESSENTIAL IDEOLOGICAL TENANTS 1876:00:18, 10 February 2024 (UTC) 1784:18:51, 16 February 2024 (UTC) 1606:history of disruptive editing 1434:made in a previous discussion 924:10.1080/03056244.2020.1805730 557:and see a list of open tasks. 480:This article is supported by 441:Template:WikiProject Politics 432:and see a list of open tasks. 321:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 2495:01:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC) 2426:12:59, 23 January 2024 (UTC) 2407:12:52, 23 January 2024 (UTC) 2393:12:09, 23 January 2024 (UTC) 2372:11:50, 23 January 2024 (UTC) 2358:11:38, 23 January 2024 (UTC) 2340:11:23, 23 January 2024 (UTC) 2326:10:48, 23 January 2024 (UTC) 2304:09:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC) 2286:09:53, 23 January 2024 (UTC) 2268:09:12, 23 January 2024 (UTC) 2254:00:09, 23 January 2024 (UTC) 2236:23:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC) 2221:20:26, 20 January 2024 (UTC) 2201:16:00, 20 January 2024 (UTC) 1993:09:43, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 1858:23:41, 9 February 2024 (UTC) 1438:Afrikaner Weerstandsbeweging 1430:Afrikaner Weerstandsbeweging 1400:Afrikaner Weerstandsbeweging 1280:Associated Press, 6 May 2019 996:Journal of African Elections 725:Journalism, Gender and Power 641:10:47, 15 January 2022 (UTC) 622:09:05, 15 January 2022 (UTC) 483:Political parties task force 1977:23:46, 8 October 2023 (UTC) 1912:13:01, 5 October 2023 (UTC) 1897:12:36, 5 October 2023 (UTC) 1844:18:07, 1 October 2023 (UTC) 1830:09:37, 10 August 2023 (UTC) 1760:12:51, 5 October 2023 (UTC) 1745:09:39, 10 August 2023 (UTC) 1451:As for your claim that the 1413:Please give your two cents 655:20:11, 30 August 2023 (UTC) 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 2766: 2740:B-Class socialism articles 2664:Primary sources in infobox 2591:04:14, 3 August 2024 (UTC) 2570:01:50, 16 March 2024 (UTC) 2550:04:09, 3 August 2024 (UTC) 1983:make up their own minds.-- 1815:00:57, 8 August 2023 (UTC) 1800:Political position removal 1731:18:46, 3 August 2023 (UTC) 1716:15:38, 1 August 2023 (UTC) 1701:23:22, 20 March 2023 (UTC) 1659:22:00, 20 March 2023 (UTC) 1630:21:35, 20 March 2023 (UTC) 1581:20:32, 20 March 2023 (UTC) 1551:19:57, 20 March 2023 (UTC) 1502:19:13, 20 March 2023 (UTC) 1466:11:36, 20 March 2023 (UTC) 1423:04:09, 20 March 2023 (UTC) 1131:10.18820/24150479/aa50i3.5 589:project's importance scale 464:project's importance scale 353:project's importance scale 2710:B-Class politics articles 1357:03:17, 13 July 2022 (UTC) 1338:23:55, 30 June 2022 (UTC) 1313:11:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC) 1257:11:14, 15 June 2022 (UTC) 1168:Fölscher, Marine (2019). 897:10.1017/S0022278X21000276 582: 515: 479: 457: 390: 346: 279: 258: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 25:Economic Freedom Fighters 2681:10:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC) 2656:15:50, 17 May 2024 (UTC) 2629:14:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC) 2611:13:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC) 1286:Reuters, 27 October 2015 1234:00:18, 4 June 2022 (UTC) 1092:23:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC) 1072:19:48, 3 June 2022 (UTC) 1051:12:24, 3 June 2022 (UTC) 1030:11:05, 3 June 2022 (UTC) 856:04:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC) 688:19:35, 3 June 2022 (UTC) 669:01:10, 1 June 2024 (UTC) 310:WikiProject South Africa 2155:Morning in South Africa 2153:Campbell, John (2016). 2035:pointed out 2 years ago 1268:Al Jazeera, 2 June 2022 1096:FWIW, further sourcing. 960:Essop, Tasneem (2015). 2111:Add racism to ideology 476: 240:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 2487:~~ AirshipJungleman29 2479:~~ AirshipJungleman29 2464:third opinion request 2171:Lewis, Megan (2016). 546:WikiProject Socialism 475: 333:South Africa articles 195:Auto-archiving period 100:Neutral point of view 972:(1&2): 212–238. 421:WikiProject Politics 105:No original research 1602:one personal attack 804:The Daily Telegraph 302:South Africa portal 1514:before continuing. 1008:10.10520/EJC172991 608:Political position 569:socialism articles 477: 246:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 2556:Anti-white racism 2500: 2499: 1077:note elements of 603: 602: 599: 598: 595: 594: 494: 493: 490: 489: 444:politics articles 381:Political parties 363: 362: 359: 358: 226: 225: 66:Assume good faith 43: 2757: 2616:This would be a 2460: 2459: 2453: 2452: 2424: 2417: 2391: 2384: 2356: 2349: 2324: 2317: 2284: 2277: 2252: 2245: 2180: 2179: 2168: 2162: 2161: 2150: 1874: 1867: 1212: 1211: 1184: 1178: 1177: 1165: 1159: 1158: 1145: 1139: 1138: 1114: 1012: 1011: 987: 981: 980: 957: 951: 950: 934: 928: 927: 918:(165): 416–431. 907: 901: 900: 880: 834:Associated Press 629:reliable sources 571: 570: 567: 564: 561: 540: 538:Socialism portal 535: 534: 524: 517: 516: 511: 503: 496: 446: 445: 442: 439: 436: 415: 410: 409: 399: 392: 391: 386: 383: 372: 365: 335: 334: 331: 328: 325: 304: 299: 298: 297: 288: 281: 280: 275: 267: 260: 243: 237: 236: 228: 220: 206: 205: 196: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 2765: 2764: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2685: 2684: 2666: 2599: 2558: 2505: 2457: 2415: 2413: 2382: 2380: 2347: 2345: 2315: 2313: 2292:reliable source 2275: 2273: 2243: 2241: 2208: 2193:Amalthea Little 2188: 2186:Not antisemitic 2183: 2170: 2169: 2165: 2152: 2151: 2147: 2117:Wiki libre 1919 2113: 2094: 1922: 1865: 1863: 1820:I support this. 1802: 1689:personal attack 1392: 1326:Foreign Affairs 1320:For the record 1217: 1216: 1215: 1186: 1185: 1181: 1167: 1166: 1162: 1147: 1146: 1142: 1116: 1115: 1111: 1017: 1016: 1015: 989: 988: 984: 959: 958: 954: 936: 935: 931: 909: 908: 904: 882: 881: 877: 794:The Independent 764:Foreign Affairs 627:Please provide 610: 568: 565: 562: 559: 558: 536: 529: 509: 443: 440: 437: 434: 433: 413:Politics portal 411: 404: 384: 378: 332: 329: 326: 323: 322: 300: 295: 293: 273: 244:on Knowledge's 241: 222: 221: 216: 193: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 2763: 2761: 2753: 2752: 2747: 2742: 2737: 2732: 2727: 2722: 2717: 2712: 2707: 2702: 2697: 2687: 2686: 2665: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2644: 2638: 2598: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2579: 2576: 2557: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2538: 2535: 2504: 2501: 2498: 2497: 2469: 2468: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2207: 2204: 2187: 2184: 2182: 2181: 2163: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2112: 2109: 2098:Death Editor 2 2093: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 1958: 1957: 1941: 1940: 1921: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1801: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1681: 1673: 1665: 1646: 1642: 1639: 1635: 1617: 1598: 1595: 1591: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1557: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1519:Cape Coloureds 1515: 1490: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1449: 1391: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1293: 1287: 1281: 1275: 1269: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1214: 1213: 1179: 1160: 1140: 1125:(3): 102–121. 1119:Acta Academica 1108: 1107: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1053: 1032: 1014: 1013: 982: 952: 929: 902: 891:(4): 535–558. 874: 873: 869: 868: 867: 859: 858: 838: 837: 827: 817: 807: 797: 787: 777: 774:Deutsche Welle 767: 757: 748: 738: 728: 722: 716: 710: 699: 698: 692: 676: 675: 674: 673: 672: 671: 661:173.80.108.187 609: 606: 601: 600: 597: 596: 593: 592: 585:Mid-importance 581: 575: 574: 572: 555:the discussion 542: 541: 525: 513: 512: 510:Mid‑importance 504: 492: 491: 488: 487: 478: 468: 467: 460:Mid-importance 456: 450: 449: 447: 430:the discussion 417: 416: 400: 388: 387: 385:Mid‑importance 373: 361: 360: 357: 356: 349:Mid-importance 345: 339: 338: 336: 319:the discussion 306: 305: 289: 277: 276: 274:Mid‑importance 268: 256: 255: 249: 238: 224: 223: 214: 212: 211: 208: 207: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2762: 2751: 2748: 2746: 2743: 2741: 2738: 2736: 2733: 2731: 2728: 2726: 2723: 2721: 2718: 2716: 2713: 2711: 2708: 2706: 2703: 2701: 2698: 2696: 2693: 2692: 2690: 2683: 2682: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2671: 2663: 2657: 2653: 2649: 2645: 2643: 2639: 2637:I found this: 2636: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2619: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2608: 2604: 2596: 2592: 2588: 2584: 2580: 2577: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2555: 2551: 2547: 2543: 2539: 2536: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2515: 2511: 2502: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2471: 2470: 2467: 2465: 2455: 2454: 2427: 2423: 2422: 2418: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2404: 2400: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2390: 2389: 2385: 2378: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2369: 2365: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2355: 2354: 2350: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2337: 2333: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2323: 2322: 2318: 2311: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2301: 2297: 2293: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2283: 2282: 2278: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2251: 2250: 2246: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2218: 2214: 2205: 2203: 2202: 2198: 2194: 2185: 2178: 2174: 2167: 2164: 2160: 2156: 2149: 2146: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2122: 2118: 2110: 2108: 2107: 2103: 2099: 2091: 2077: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2036: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2004: 2000: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1990: 1986: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1974: 1970: 1965: 1961: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1934: 1929: 1927: 1919: 1913: 1909: 1905: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1885: 1877: 1873: 1872: 1868: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1812: 1808: 1799: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1679: 1674: 1671: 1666: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1656: 1652: 1647: 1643: 1640: 1636: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1618: 1615: 1613: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1596: 1592: 1589: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1578: 1574: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1558: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1535: 1531: 1527: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1454: 1450: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1401: 1395: 1389: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1345: 1344:The Economist 1341: 1340: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1322:The Economist 1319: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1297: 1294: 1291: 1288: 1285: 1282: 1279: 1276: 1273: 1270: 1267: 1264: 1263: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1249:LearnIndology 1246: 1243: 1242: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1183: 1180: 1176: 1171: 1164: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1152: 1144: 1141: 1137: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1113: 1110: 1106: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1080: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1060: 1057: 1054: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1043: 1036: 1033: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1018: 1009: 1005: 1001: 997: 993: 986: 983: 978: 975: 971: 967: 963: 956: 953: 949:(3): 304–328. 948: 944: 940: 933: 930: 925: 921: 917: 913: 906: 903: 898: 894: 890: 886: 879: 876: 872: 864: 861: 860: 857: 853: 849: 845: 840: 839: 835: 831: 828: 825: 821: 818: 815: 811: 808: 805: 801: 798: 795: 791: 788: 785: 784:The Economist 781: 778: 775: 771: 768: 765: 761: 758: 756: 752: 749: 746: 742: 739: 736: 732: 729: 726: 723: 720: 717: 714: 711: 708: 704: 701: 700: 695: 694: 693: 690: 689: 685: 681: 670: 666: 662: 658: 657: 656: 652: 648: 644: 643: 642: 638: 634: 630: 626: 625: 624: 623: 619: 615: 607: 605: 590: 586: 580: 577: 576: 573: 556: 552: 548: 547: 539: 533: 528: 526: 523: 519: 518: 514: 508: 505: 502: 498: 485: 484: 474: 470: 469: 465: 461: 455: 452: 451: 448: 431: 427: 423: 422: 414: 408: 403: 401: 398: 394: 393: 389: 382: 377: 374: 371: 367: 354: 350: 344: 341: 340: 337: 320: 316: 312: 311: 303: 292: 290: 287: 283: 282: 278: 272: 269: 266: 262: 257: 253: 247: 239: 235: 230: 229: 210: 209: 204: 200: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 2675: 2673: 2667: 2623: 2621: 2600: 2559: 2506: 2462:Response to 2461: 2420: 2387: 2352: 2320: 2280: 2248: 2209: 2189: 2176: 2172: 2166: 2158: 2154: 2148: 2114: 2095: 1997:Agreed 100% 1966: 1962: 1959: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1932: 1930: 1923: 1870: 1803: 1684: 1670:WP:NOTAFORUM 1609: 1587: 1539:WP:NOTAFORUM 1452: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1396: 1393: 1343: 1317: 1244: 1208: 1199:(4): 53–72. 1196: 1192: 1182: 1173: 1169: 1163: 1155: 1150: 1143: 1134: 1122: 1118: 1112: 1104: 1079:WP:RECENTISM 1055: 1041: 1040: 1034: 1002:(1): 35–59. 999: 995: 985: 969: 965: 955: 946: 942: 932: 915: 911: 905: 888: 884: 878: 870: 862: 844:undue weight 735:The Guardian 691: 677: 611: 604: 584: 544: 481: 459: 419: 348: 324:South Africa 315:South Africa 308: 271:South Africa 252:WikiProjects 198: 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 2213:Souliousery 1902:position.-- 1687:" is not a 1608:who said: " 1364:Red fascism 1224:Regards, -- 1020:Regards, -- 148:free images 31:not a forum 2689:Categories 2670:WP:PRIMARY 2618:WP:PRIMARY 2597:Trotskyism 2416:The Banner 2383:The Banner 2348:The Banner 2316:The Banner 2276:The Banner 2244:The Banner 1887:article.-- 1866:The Banner 1523:March 2018 1349:Goldsztajn 1305:Goldsztajn 1226:Goldsztajn 1136:education. 1105:References 1084:Goldsztajn 1059:Goldsztajn 1022:Goldsztajn 871:References 755:Al Jazeera 2132:Helper201 2019:. Thanks. 1924:To quote 1850:N 7658777 1807:N 7658777 1440:page, be 1330:Helper201 1303:Regards, 1064:Helper201 1042:North8000 977:0706-1706 863:No change 848:Helper201 824:France 24 727:. (Book). 721:. (Book). 715:. (Book). 680:Helper201 560:Socialism 551:socialism 507:Socialism 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 2583:Transvex 2542:Transvex 2503:Ideology 2475:WP:ECREE 2054:Stix1776 2021:Stix1776 1999:Stix1776 1969:Transvex 1822:Stix1776 1737:Stix1776 1708:Stix1776 1508:WP:CIVIL 1245:Far-left 707:BBC News 435:Politics 426:politics 376:Politics 199:365 days 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 2648:Genabab 2603:Genabab 2377:WP:NPOV 2310:WP:NPOV 2017:WP:ONUS 1985:Discott 1904:Discott 1889:Discott 1752:Discott 1723:Discott 1610:Admin " 1368:Discott 1318:Comment 1056:Comment 745:Reuters 633:Vacant0 587:on the 462:on the 351:on the 242:B-class 154:WP refs 142:scholar 2676:Czello 2635:Czello 2624:Czello 2399:Alssa1 2364:Alssa1 2332:Alssa1 2296:Alssa1 2260:Alssa1 2228:Alssa1 2068:Alssa1 2039:Alssa1 2013:Alssa1 1693:Alssa1 1622:Alssa1 1612:Drmies 1543:Alssa1 1512:WP:AGF 1510:& 1458:Alssa1 614:DR5996 248:scale. 126:Google 1586:that 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 2652:talk 2607:talk 2587:talk 2566:talk 2546:talk 2529:talk 2514:talk 2491:talk 2483:talk 2421:talk 2403:talk 2388:talk 2368:talk 2353:talk 2336:talk 2321:talk 2300:talk 2281:talk 2264:talk 2249:talk 2232:talk 2217:talk 2197:talk 2136:talk 2121:talk 2102:talk 2072:talk 2058:talk 2043:talk 2025:talk 2011:Hi @ 2003:talk 1989:talk 1973:talk 1908:talk 1893:talk 1871:talk 1854:talk 1840:talk 1826:talk 1811:talk 1780:talk 1756:talk 1741:talk 1727:talk 1712:talk 1697:talk 1655:talk 1626:talk 1577:talk 1547:talk 1498:talk 1462:talk 1442:bold 1432:was 1419:talk 1372:talk 1353:talk 1334:talk 1309:talk 1253:talk 1230:talk 1088:talk 1068:talk 1047:talk 1026:talk 974:ISSN 852:talk 684:talk 665:talk 651:talk 637:talk 618:talk 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 1529:is. 1446:NDP 1201:doi 1127:doi 1004:doi 920:doi 893:doi 814:NPR 579:Mid 454:Mid 343:Mid 176:TWL 2691:: 2654:) 2609:) 2589:) 2568:) 2548:) 2531:) 2516:) 2493:) 2405:) 2370:) 2338:) 2302:) 2266:) 2234:) 2219:) 2199:) 2138:) 2123:) 2104:) 2074:) 2060:) 2045:) 2027:) 2005:) 1991:) 1975:) 1910:) 1895:) 1856:) 1842:) 1828:) 1813:) 1782:) 1758:) 1743:) 1729:) 1714:) 1699:) 1657:) 1628:) 1579:) 1549:) 1500:) 1464:) 1421:) 1374:) 1355:) 1336:) 1311:) 1255:) 1232:) 1207:. 1197:11 1195:. 1191:. 1133:. 1123:50 1121:. 1090:) 1070:) 1049:) 1028:) 1000:14 998:. 994:. 970:48 968:. 964:. 947:48 945:. 941:. 916:47 914:. 889:59 887:. 854:) 846:. 832:. 822:. 812:. 802:. 792:. 782:. 772:. 762:. 753:. 743:. 733:. 705:. 686:) 667:) 653:) 639:) 620:) 379:: 197:: 156:) 54:; 2650:( 2633:@ 2605:( 2585:( 2564:( 2544:( 2527:( 2512:( 2489:( 2481:( 2466:: 2401:( 2366:( 2334:( 2298:( 2262:( 2230:( 2215:( 2195:( 2134:( 2119:( 2100:( 2070:( 2056:( 2041:( 2023:( 2001:( 1987:( 1971:( 1906:( 1891:( 1852:( 1838:( 1824:( 1809:( 1778:( 1754:( 1739:( 1725:( 1710:( 1695:( 1653:( 1624:( 1575:( 1545:( 1496:( 1460:( 1417:( 1370:( 1351:( 1332:( 1307:( 1251:( 1228:( 1203:: 1129:: 1086:( 1066:( 1045:( 1024:( 1010:. 1006:: 979:. 926:. 922:: 899:. 895:: 850:( 836:. 826:. 816:. 806:. 796:. 786:. 776:. 766:. 747:. 737:. 709:. 682:( 663:( 649:( 635:( 616:( 591:. 486:. 466:. 355:. 254:: 191:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index