1309:"I am opening this discussion after the recent series of back-and-forth reverts that started as a result of my addition of the word "erroneous" into the first sentence of this article. Per the scientific consensus on the HIV pathogen, it does indeed cause AIDS if left untreated, and denying said fact is by definition erroneous, since denialists do not have any factual or scientific basis at all for their claims and are repeating incorrect statements, which I have clarified in my edit summaries." The problem with that unsourced statement, is that it erroneously presumes that 'denialists' (an emotive word) only believe that HIV doesn't cause AIDS. The problem is that there are many more problems with the orthodox view of HIV/AIDS. First, the prosaic origin story of the 'Bush Meat' origin of the epidemic and the subsequent building epidemic escaping from the jungle; or the gay flight attendant Gaetan Dugas being 'patient zero', while in fact it was Merck's (hepatitis B) vaccine
168:
417:
605:
152:
706:
1106:
1085:
626:
324:
902:
884:
377:
912:
292:
812:
791:
574:
995:
974:
1005:
1227:
The first proposed edit, which only adds in "erroneous" to the first sentence while leaving everything else unchanged, does not make the article worse (As in compromising the factual accuracy of information, violating
Knowledge policy, or disrupting its tone), especially since the word "erroneous" is
1178:
I am opening this discussion after the recent series of back-and-forth reverts that started as a result of my addition of the word "erroneous" into the first sentence of this article. Per the scientific consensus on the HIV pathogen, it does indeed cause AIDS if left untreated, and denying said fact
553:
does not require that all hypotheses be treated as equal or valid, nor is neutrality decided by the opinions of editors. On
Knowledge, neutrality is represented by a fair summary of the opinion found in the relevant reliable, independent sources. If those sources reject an idea with unanimity or
1313:
which was the origin of SIV in the gay communities of New York, LA and San
Francisco; IV drug users; prostitutes and Haitian immigrants exposed to bad water. Then, there is the extent of the epidemic, also known as 'AIDS in Africa', which is completely based on modeling, and is not supported by
1179:
is by definition erroneous, since denialists do not have any factual or scientific basis at all for their claims and are repeating incorrect statements, which I have clarified in my edit summaries. The definition of "erroneous" is also clear according to the Oxford
English Dictionary:
1246:
phrasing, "HIV/AIDS denialism is the belief, contradicted by conclusive evidence..." adequately communicates the status of HIV denialism. Additional negative modifiers are unnecessarily repetitive. Unnecessary repetition makes the article worse.
1197:
Knowledge does not have a bias toward the status quo (except in cases of fully developed disputes, while they are being resolved). In fact, Knowledge has a bias toward change, as a means of maximizing quality by maximizing participation."
1228:
describing statements or beliefs that are false, misleading, or incorrect, which denialism of scientific facts represents. A clarification as to why would said edit worsen the quality of this article would be appropriate in this case.
738:, a collaborative effort to improve Knowledge's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the
514:
for such an example). Before starting another discussion about the article title, please consult the above policy and guideline, and read through the archives to see if your concern has already been addressed.
145:
525:
The scientists most often cited by the AIDS denialism movements are usually speaking outside their field of expertise, and generally have not published their disputes in reputable journals. For instance,
459:, requires that editors not add their own editorial biases when writing text based on such sources. As the relevant academic field universally rejects the several hypotheses grouped under the umbrella of
227:
1189:
to hopefully end this edit war, Antandrus swiftly came in and rolled it back with the same reasoning of "no improvement", even though the very page I have cited contradicts said reasoning, as it states:
160:
463:, it would be a disservice to our readers to fail to report this as part of a full treatment of the topic. Further advice for how to treat topics such as this one may be found at the
468:
1434:
Appreciate the history, Mathglot. I remembered there was an LTA who focused on this page, though it was escaping me who it was — I don't have a great memory for those things.
1023:
181:
1627:
773:
763:
283:
1027:
1552:
343:
1632:
727:
1682:
1156:
1146:
502:; the word "denialism" is frequently used in the sociological and other professional literature on the topic. Furthermore, "AIDS denialism" adheres to both the
1612:
1328:
The fact that denialists believe other loony crap does not make their erroneous belief that HIV does not cause AIDS less erroneous, so this is irrelevant. --
739:
678:
1536:
1622:
1480:
688:
1687:
1657:
89:
54:
1532:
1289:. I don't really see how I can "clarify" it further than I already did, but I'll try one more time: making the style less grownup damages the article.
1667:
1384:
1067:
1057:
194:
1617:
507:
1672:
1602:
1122:
940:
734:
711:
1677:
1642:
866:
856:
654:
223:
95:
1607:
1370:
1315:
1032:
456:
1662:
1647:
1113:
1090:
936:
926:
889:
831:, and related topics on Knowledge. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
1448:
Yes, it's absolutely him. I've followed for a while. FYI he also typically simultaneously vandalizes Simple and the
Spanish wikis.
633:
610:
1411:
I tried my best to bring
Ezequiel (in 2018, a minor child) back into the fold, but was unable to. Sad to see he's still at it.
452:
448:
394:
109:
40:
1652:
1637:
1018:
979:
114:
30:
1185:
So why were my edits still reverted in spite of my explanation and the fact it didn't damage the article? Even when I cited
494:
There are several alternative terms describing the same constellation of ideas, and
Knowledge articles should use the most
1378:
511:
84:
585:
495:
362:
331:
421:
75:
832:
819:
796:
653:
related articles on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
499:
444:
358:
291:
218:
1398:
1394:
535:
464:
510:" guideline. It reflects the consensus among editors here and has been discussed several times in the past (see
302:
201:
1439:
1364:
136:
1374:
1402:
1319:
119:
1470:
1406:
1388:
390:
350:
1576:
could you run the guc tool run on the IP ranges indicated? There may be more than one range; see above.
1548:
1360:
361:
may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the
1419:
who was very helpful; so were a lot of other admins, notably Huon, Kudpung, Yamla, 331dot, and others.
1333:
591:
1475:
208:
1524:
1286:
1193:"Do not revert an edit because that edit is unnecessary, i.e. the edit does not improve the article.
1186:
538:. Within the virology research community, however, there is no longer any doubt that HIV causes AIDS.
384:
573:
1452:
1435:
1359:, fyi and for the record: the recent IP vandalism at the article is highly reminiscent of indeffed
1356:
1233:
1203:
398:
354:
65:
1121:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1581:
1560:
1424:
1294:
519:
Q3: What about the famous and respectable scientists who dispute the role of HIV in causing AIDS?
307:
80:
34:
1273:'Erroneous' and 'contradicted by conclusive evidence' is the same thing. No need for tautology
187:
61:
1412:
1329:
1252:
1218:
625:
604:
304:
1195:
For a reversion to be appropriate, the reverted edit must actually make the article worse.
1010:
935:-related issues on Knowledge. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the
1310:
1544:
1462:
1449:
1268:
1229:
1199:
726:
705:
550:
527:
503:
339:
1507:
1285:
Yet you simply continued to revert, referring (with I suppose unintentional humor) to
1267:
Yes, your addition made the article worse, as I explained twice in my edit summaries,
1596:
1577:
1556:
1491:
1420:
1416:
1290:
646:
642:
555:
335:
1105:
1084:
376:
323:
1512:
1118:
917:
175:
437:
Q1: Why does this article dismiss AIDS denialism as a valid scientific hypothesis?
1540:
1528:
1496:
1571:
1520:
1248:
1214:
531:
901:
883:
1000:
907:
650:
306:
1585:
1564:
1455:
1443:
1428:
1337:
1323:
1297:
1256:
1237:
1222:
1207:
543:
Q4: Doesn't
Knowledge's policy on "neutrality" require a neutral treatment?
1502:
824:
823:, an attempt to build a comprehensive, detailed, and accessible guide to
135:
17:
1486:
811:
790:
638:
994:
973:
389:
If you've come here in response to such recruitment, please review
932:
931:, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all
416:
1030:. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at
1387:)) and a slew of IP addresses, many of which are enumerated at
1280:
it does make the prose style less encyclopedic and less grownup
151:
828:
567:
406:
371:
318:
308:
25:
1022:, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the
447:
that have a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. The
349:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the
159:
1213:
The proposed edit makes the article worse. Good revert.
334:
procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
1314:
predictions made about population growth or mortality.
1283:
1276:
1243:
427:
391:
the relevant Knowledge policy on recruitment of editors
1117:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
637:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1415:was heavily involved and may want a ping; as was
43:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1026:and that biomedical information in any article
1395:User talk:190.173.150.216#Range blocked again
1024:Manual of Style for medicine-related articles
207:
167:
8:
469:Reliable sources (medicine-related articles)
1079:
968:
878:
785:
700:
599:
558:requires that that rejection be presented.
530:is a groundbreaking cancer researcher and
1628:Mid-importance Alternative Views articles
1407:User talk:191.85.20.46#HIV/Aids denialism
1311:Interview with prof. dr. Maurice Hilleman
1354:Hi Ezequiel, ¿cómo sos vos? ¿Todo bien?
397:. Disputes on Knowledge are resolved by
1081:
970:
880:
787:
748:Knowledge:WikiProject Alternative Views
702:
601:
571:
476:Q2: Why does this article use the term
1633:WikiProject Alternative Views articles
1279:
1272:
751:Template:WikiProject Alternative Views
385:recruit editors of specific viewpoints
1467:thanks for that. Convenience links:
193:
7:
1683:Low-importance pharmacology articles
1111:This article is within the scope of
1016:This article is within the scope of
732:This article is within the scope of
631:This article is within the scope of
1613:High-importance Skepticism articles
1033:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Medicine
451:policy, especially the sections on
33:for discussing improvements to the
1623:B-Class Alternative Views articles
1131:Knowledge:WikiProject Pharmacology
949:Knowledge:WikiProject LGBT studies
24:
1688:WikiProject Pharmacology articles
1658:WikiProject LGBT studies articles
1389:User talk:191.85.20.46#Dynamic IP
1350:Recent IP vandalism and 2018 sock
1134:Template:WikiProject Pharmacology
952:Template:WikiProject LGBT studies
1668:Low-importance medicine articles
1104:
1083:
1028:use high-quality medical sources
1003:
993:
972:
910:
900:
882:
810:
789:
725:
704:
663:Knowledge:WikiProject Skepticism
624:
603:
572:
415:
375:
322:
290:
55:Click here to start a new topic.
1618:WikiProject Skepticism articles
1151:This article has been rated as
1062:This article has been rated as
923:This article is of interest to
861:This article has been rated as
768:This article has been rated as
683:This article has been rated as
666:Template:WikiProject Skepticism
1673:All WikiProject Medicine pages
1603:Knowledge controversial topics
1042:Knowledge:WikiProject Medicine
590:It is of interest to multiple
1:
1678:B-Class pharmacology articles
1298:11:56, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
1257:01:15, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
1238:01:10, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
1223:01:02, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
1208:00:59, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
1174:"Erroneous belief" discussion
1125:and see a list of open tasks.
1045:Template:WikiProject Medicine
735:WikiProject Alternative views
657:and see a list of open tasks.
363:contentious topics procedures
52:Put new text under old text.
1643:Top-importance AIDS articles
1586:23:47, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
1565:23:24, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
1527:) this wmflabs guc link for
1471:es:Negacionismo del VIH/sida
1456:22:20, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
1444:22:13, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
1429:22:07, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
395:neutral point of view policy
383:There have been attempts to
1608:B-Class Skepticism articles
60:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1704:
1531:, showing him vandalizing
1157:project's importance scale
1068:project's importance scale
867:project's importance scale
841:Knowledge:WikiProject AIDS
774:project's importance scale
754:Alternative Views articles
689:project's importance scale
549:No. Knowledge's policy on
432:Frequently asked questions
1663:B-Class medicine articles
1648:WikiProject AIDS articles
1399:User talk:190.173.138.153
1338:11:07, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
1150:
1099:
1061:
988:
895:
860:
844:Template:WikiProject AIDS
805:
767:
720:
682:
619:
598:
365:before editing this page.
90:Be welcoming to newcomers
1324:08:21, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
1114:WikiProject Pharmacology
927:WikiProject LGBT studies
817:This article is part of
512:this archived discussion
359:normal editorial process
1403:User talk:190.173.161.2
488:, or some similar term?
401:, not by majority vote.
346:as a contentious topic.
634:WikiProject Skepticism
580:This article is rated
355:standards of behaviour
85:avoid personal attacks
1653:B-Class LGBT articles
1638:B-Class AIDS articles
1137:pharmacology articles
939:or contribute to the
835:for more information.
504:neutral point of view
449:neutral point of view
284:Auto-archiving period
133:Find medical sources:
110:Neutral point of view
1529:cross-wiki vandalism
1182:"Wrong; incorrect."
1019:WikiProject Medicine
443:Knowledge relies on
351:purpose of Knowledge
115:No original research
1375:Riveronthemountains
669:Skepticism articles
1515:) – some vandalism
1483:) – some vandalism
586:content assessment
332:contentious topics
139:
96:dispute resolution
57:
35:HIV/AIDS denialism
1555:) wikis. Cheers,
1442:
1410:
1171:
1170:
1167:
1166:
1163:
1162:
1078:
1077:
1074:
1073:
1048:medicine articles
967:
966:
963:
962:
877:
876:
873:
872:
784:
783:
780:
779:
745:Alternative Views
712:Alternative Views
699:
698:
695:
694:
566:
565:
430:
405:
404:
393:, as well as the
370:
369:
342:, which has been
315:
314:
138:Source guidelines
137:
76:Assume good faith
53:
1695:
1575:
1510:
1499:) – clean so far
1494:
1478:
1466:
1438:
1392:
1139:
1138:
1135:
1132:
1129:
1108:
1101:
1100:
1095:
1087:
1080:
1050:
1049:
1046:
1043:
1040:
1013:
1008:
1007:
1006:
997:
990:
989:
984:
976:
969:
957:
956:
953:
950:
947:
920:
915:
914:
913:
904:
897:
896:
886:
879:
849:
848:
845:
842:
839:
820:WikiProject AIDS
814:
807:
806:
801:
793:
786:
756:
755:
752:
749:
746:
729:
722:
721:
716:
708:
701:
671:
670:
667:
664:
661:
628:
621:
620:
615:
607:
600:
583:
577:
576:
568:
554:near-unanimity,
506:policy and the "
500:reliable sources
486:AIDS reappraisal
445:reliable sources
420:
419:
407:
387:to this article.
379:
372:
326:
319:
309:
295:
294:
285:
212:
211:
197:
171:
163:
155:
141:
105:Article policies
26:
1703:
1702:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1694:
1693:
1692:
1593:
1592:
1569:
1523:also includes (
1506:
1490:
1474:
1460:
1352:
1176:
1136:
1133:
1130:
1127:
1126:
1093:
1047:
1044:
1041:
1038:
1037:
1011:Medicine portal
1009:
1004:
1002:
982:
954:
951:
948:
945:
944:
916:
911:
909:
846:
843:
840:
837:
836:
799:
753:
750:
747:
744:
743:
714:
685:High-importance
668:
665:
662:
659:
658:
614:High‑importance
613:
584:on Knowledge's
581:
562:
561:
560:
559:
544:
540:
539:
520:
516:
515:
496:widely accepted
489:
473:
472:
465:Fringe theories
438:
433:
431:
353:, any expected
311:
310:
305:
282:
131:
126:
125:
124:
101:
71:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1701:
1699:
1691:
1690:
1685:
1680:
1675:
1670:
1665:
1660:
1655:
1650:
1645:
1640:
1635:
1630:
1625:
1620:
1615:
1610:
1605:
1595:
1594:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1567:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1500:
1484:
1446:
1436:GorillaWarfare
1361:EzequielBelaus
1357:GorillaWarfare
1355:
1351:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1302:
1301:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1175:
1172:
1169:
1168:
1165:
1164:
1161:
1160:
1153:Low-importance
1149:
1143:
1142:
1140:
1123:the discussion
1109:
1097:
1096:
1094:Low‑importance
1088:
1076:
1075:
1072:
1071:
1064:Low-importance
1060:
1054:
1053:
1051:
1015:
1014:
998:
986:
985:
983:Low‑importance
977:
965:
964:
961:
960:
958:
922:
921:
905:
893:
892:
887:
875:
874:
871:
870:
863:Top-importance
859:
853:
852:
850:
815:
803:
802:
800:Top‑importance
794:
782:
781:
778:
777:
770:Mid-importance
766:
760:
759:
757:
730:
718:
717:
715:Mid‑importance
709:
697:
696:
693:
692:
681:
675:
674:
672:
655:the discussion
629:
617:
616:
608:
596:
595:
589:
578:
564:
563:
545:
542:
541:
528:Peter Duesberg
521:
518:
517:
508:words to watch
490:
478:AIDS denialism
475:
474:
461:AIDS denialism
457:equal validity
439:
436:
435:
434:
414:
413:
412:
410:
403:
402:
380:
368:
367:
340:fringe science
327:
313:
312:
303:
301:
300:
297:
296:
214:
213:
128:
127:
123:
122:
117:
112:
103:
102:
100:
99:
92:
87:
78:
72:
70:
69:
58:
49:
48:
45:
44:
38:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1700:
1689:
1686:
1684:
1681:
1679:
1676:
1674:
1671:
1669:
1666:
1664:
1661:
1659:
1656:
1654:
1651:
1649:
1646:
1644:
1641:
1639:
1636:
1634:
1631:
1629:
1626:
1624:
1621:
1619:
1616:
1614:
1611:
1609:
1606:
1604:
1601:
1600:
1598:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1573:
1568:
1566:
1562:
1558:
1554:
1550:
1546:
1542:
1538:
1534:
1530:
1526:
1522:
1519:
1514:
1509:
1504:
1501:
1498:
1493:
1488:
1485:
1482:
1477:
1472:
1469:
1468:
1464:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1454:
1451:
1447:
1445:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1408:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1390:
1386:
1383:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1369:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1349:
1339:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1316:83.84.100.133
1312:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1299:
1296:
1292:
1288:
1287:WP:DONTREVERT
1284:
1281:
1277:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1265:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1245:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1196:
1191:
1188:
1187:WP:DONTREVERT
1183:
1180:
1173:
1158:
1154:
1148:
1145:
1144:
1141:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1115:
1110:
1107:
1103:
1102:
1098:
1092:
1089:
1086:
1082:
1069:
1065:
1059:
1056:
1055:
1052:
1035:
1034:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1020:
1012:
1001:
999:
996:
992:
991:
987:
981:
978:
975:
971:
959:
955:LGBT articles
942:
938:
934:
930:
929:
928:
919:
908:
906:
903:
899:
898:
894:
891:
888:
885:
881:
868:
864:
858:
855:
854:
851:
847:AIDS articles
834:
830:
826:
822:
821:
816:
813:
809:
808:
804:
798:
795:
792:
788:
775:
771:
765:
762:
761:
758:
741:
737:
736:
731:
728:
724:
723:
719:
713:
710:
707:
703:
690:
686:
680:
677:
676:
673:
656:
652:
648:
647:pseudohistory
644:
643:pseudoscience
640:
636:
635:
630:
627:
623:
622:
618:
612:
609:
606:
602:
597:
593:
587:
579:
575:
570:
569:
557:
552:
548:
537:
533:
529:
524:
513:
509:
505:
501:
497:
493:
487:
483:
479:
470:
466:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
442:
429:
426:
423:
418:
411:
409:
408:
400:
396:
392:
388:
386:
381:
378:
374:
373:
366:
364:
360:
356:
352:
347:
345:
341:
337:
336:pseudoscience
333:
328:
325:
321:
320:
317:
299:
298:
293:
289:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
222:
220:
216:
215:
210:
206:
203:
200:
196:
192:
189:
186:
183:
182:ScienceDirect
180:
177:
174:
170:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
147:
144:
140:
134:
130:
129:
121:
120:Verifiability
118:
116:
113:
111:
108:
107:
106:
97:
93:
91:
88:
86:
82:
79:
77:
74:
73:
67:
63:
62:Learn to edit
59:
56:
51:
50:
47:
46:
42:
36:
32:
28:
27:
19:
1381:
1367:
1353:
1194:
1192:
1184:
1181:
1177:
1152:
1128:Pharmacology
1119:Pharmacology
1112:
1091:Pharmacology
1063:
1031:
1017:
946:LGBT studies
937:project page
925:
924:
918:LGBTQ portal
890:LGBT studies
862:
833:project page
818:
769:
733:
684:
632:
592:WikiProjects
546:
522:
498:in the most
491:
485:
482:AIDS dissent
481:
477:
460:
453:undue weight
440:
424:
382:
348:
329:
316:
287:
217:
204:
198:
190:
184:
178:
172:
164:
156:
148:
142:
132:
104:
29:This is the
1503:Simple:AIDS
1413:Ian.thomson
1330:Hob Gadling
532:Kary Mullis
471:guidelines.
41:not a forum
1597:Categories
1549:Portuguese
1487:Simple:HIV
1393:See also:
1244:status quo
941:discussion
740:discussion
660:Skepticism
651:skepticism
611:Skepticism
556:due weight
551:neutrality
480:? Why not
344:designated
1481:discusión
1463:Antandrus
1450:Antandrus
1373:) (sock:
1269:Kaltionis
1230:Kaltionis
1200:Kaltionis
534:invented
399:consensus
357:, or any
98:if needed
81:Be polite
31:talk page
1578:Mathglot
1557:Mathglot
1476:historia
1421:Mathglot
1417:Bishonen
1385:contribs
1371:contribs
1291:Bishonen
1039:Medicine
980:Medicine
288:365 days
219:Archives
188:Springer
153:Cochrane
66:get help
39:This is
37:article.
18:Talk:HIV
1553:pt-talk
1508:history
1492:history
1155:on the
1066:on the
865:on the
772:on the
687:on the
639:science
582:B-class
1572:Wutsje
1547:, and
1545:German
1537:French
1533:Basque
1521:Wutsje
1453:(talk)
1440:(talk)
1405:, and
1249:VQuakr
1215:VQuakr
588:scale.
176:OpenMD
146:PubMed
1541:Dutch
1278:and "
933:LGBTQ
228:Index
224:Index
202:Wiley
94:Seek
16:<
1582:talk
1561:talk
1525:here
1513:talk
1497:talk
1425:talk
1379:talk
1365:talk
1334:talk
1320:talk
1295:talk
1253:talk
1242:The
1234:talk
1219:talk
1204:talk
838:AIDS
825:AIDS
797:AIDS
679:High
649:and
467:and
455:and
428:edit
422:view
338:and
330:The
195:Trip
169:Gale
161:DOAJ
83:and
1271:: "
1147:Low
1058:Low
857:Top
829:HIV
764:Mid
547:A4:
536:PCR
523:A3:
492:A2:
441:A1:
209:TWL
1599::
1584:)
1563:)
1543:,
1539:,
1535:,
1511:,
1495:,
1479:,
1427:)
1401:,
1397:,
1391:.
1336:)
1322:)
1293:|
1282:".
1255:)
1236:)
1221:)
1206:)
827:,
645:,
641:,
484:,
286::
280:13
278:,
276:12
274:,
272:11
270:,
268:10
266:,
262:,
258:,
254:,
250:,
246:,
242:,
238:,
234:,
230:,
226:,
64:;
1580:(
1574::
1570:@
1559:(
1551:(
1505:(
1489:(
1473:(
1465::
1461:@
1423:(
1409:.
1382:·
1377:(
1368:·
1363:(
1332:(
1318:(
1300:.
1275:"
1251:(
1232:(
1217:(
1202:(
1159:.
1070:.
1036:.
943:.
869:.
776:.
742:.
691:.
594:.
425:·
264:9
260:8
256:7
252:6
248:5
244:4
240:3
236:2
232:1
221::
205:·
199:·
191:·
185:·
179:·
173:·
165:·
157:·
149:·
143:·
68:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.