1231:. What policy based argument will the U-advocates have to move it back to Humour? None, of course, just as the H-advocates have got nothing at Yogurt. Note that this is not the case at, for example, Aluminium. There, there is no basis to move to the American spelling, because the original variety/title there was Commonwealth English. So, that title is stable, as this one will also be, once its original variety/title is restored. Or, imagine if the closer finds "no consensus" and the current title remains. You think this issue won't be raised again? Think again.
388:
325:
671:
655:
266:
906:
442:
421:
1294:, this is an assumption based on the idea that BR-Eng people will be more reasonable than NA-Eng people have proved in endless raising of this issue for now nearly 20 years. The justification for not changing it is an entirely reasonable one - the title is established in the article by nearly two decades of usage, RETAIN did not anyway apply to the original move because RETAIN didn't even exist as a policy then.
832:
720:
699:
216:
246:
730:
379:
808:
557:
526:
970:
1617:
1369:"Consensus to not move/Not moved should be used when a consensus has formed to not rename the article(s) in question...this notifies other editors that they should probably not propose this move in the future until and unless circumstances change. There is a positive consensus found, and that consensus is for the page to stay exactly where it is."
1668:
567:
453:
1372:), which was subsequently endorsed in a move-review. This is about as final as it will ever get regardless of which Eng-var this article is at. Discussion happened. The Eng-var was established. Whatever the case of the 2002 move, the present title has been endorsed by a consensus already. Drop the stick.
1695:
Humor is a cognitive process, characterized by the emotion it creates (mirth) and the physical reactions it causes; for example, smiling and laughter (Attardo, 2023). The concept of humor exists in every society (Beeman, 1999) though researchers remain unsure as to exactly why something is considered
1551:
There is simply no point in trying to re-litigate this again and again and again. The "but if you decide this my way then the controversy disappears" argument basically relies on BrEng speakers being more reasonable that the small number of AmEng speakers who occasionally (like once a year or less?)
1359:
You are not refuting the basic case that you are trying to apply a rule to a title-change that did not even exist when the title-change occurred, that we have not tended to apply rules retrospectively without accounting for the impact this will have, and that the name has been stable now for nearly
1358:
does not support the idea that
Aluminium has not been subject of endless conflict, even with the added weight of a standard in its favour (probably, without the standard, it would have been changed to the American spelling ages ago given the palpable anger of so many of the NA-lang editors there).
1435:
No, it had had half a dozen unique editors by that edit, plus a bot, and enough content to no longer be a stub. The variety of
English in the article had clearly been established and the sole purpose of the edit you linked was to change that variety. That's why there will be contoversy on this
1219:
must be satisfied, not just one or the other. We can argue about whether a variety of
English has been established here, but there can be no argument about whether discussion has resolved the issue. The section clearly demonstrates it has not. I said it in 2016 and I'll say it again:
1198:
It's déjà vu all over again. As I predicted in the 2016 RM five years ago, this title will remain controversial until it's moved back to the original spelling variety. Whether the move in question was a rule violation back when it was moved from the original variety in 2002 is moot.
1330:
In addition to establishing a rule against changing the variety of
English of an article and the consequence of reverting when this rule is violated, which we agree is not applicable here because the rule was apparently not yet established when the move in question here occurred,
1120:- Just to be clear here, at the point when title was changed in 2002, the rule against changing the variant of English didn't exist and wouldn't exist in concrete, definitive form for years to come. ArbCom only came up with its first injunction not to change the EngVar
1127:(and who knows, maybe the 2002 editor thought they had a "substantial reason"?). Saying that the 2002 title changed violated any guideline or policy is completely wrong since there were no such guidelines or policies at that point. The rule exists
1333:
RETAIN establishes an objective mechanism for resolving conflicts about variety of
English that is to be applied—regardless of whether there ever was any violation of any rule—any time a conflict about English variety cannot be resolved by
1837:
1414:
it seems to have still been a stub since it didn't contain any sources etc and probably wouldn't at least today have conformed with formatting standards etc so I'd suggest it was still a stub version for the purpose of RETAIN.
1319:. But it doesn't. Because the prediction is not based on any idea about how reasonable any side is. It is based on the idea that such conflicts are resolved by restoring the original variety used at a given article. That's why
1314:
If the prediction about this issue not being resolved until the NA-Eng title is restored was based on the idea that BR-Eng people will be more reasonable, then it would predict similar unresolved conflicts at articles like
1540:. This was decided in a well-attended RM discussion in 2016 that decided against moving, confirmed by a MRV which decided that the page was at the right place and here is where it should stay - the MRV literally called it
1460:
just to check in on this debate. As
British English users have been known to say there is no controversy on this subject. It's July 17th 2021,and this article is still misnamed against policy, and should be reverted to
1764:
as the physical nature makes it accessible to them. By contrast, the more complex nuances of the character’s interactions require a deeper understanding of social meaning and context, and thus may amuse a more mature
1827:
1495:
And, additionally to check in, it's 16 August 2021 and there's no actual controversy here. A consensus in favour of the title was formed at the previous RM discussion in 2016 and the name is established per
1397:
appears to be. My point stands. Regardless of what the rules were at the time the article was originally moved, what settles these discussions most reliably is going back to the original variety of
English.
166:
1102:) 21:22, 16 September 2019 (UTC) Just to note, it's July 16 2020, and this article is still in violation of ENGVAR for changing the spellings from American to british english. It should be change back.
1842:
1689:
Ok, sure! I want to rewrite the first two paragraphs with the following text. The changes aren't massive or sweeping, though, just a bit of fine-tuning. I embedded the sources for ease of reading.
1471:
1103:
1095:
1515:
1629:
1812:
1311:, perhaps you missed my refutations of both of these points above? Because you're making these claims as if they weren't even addressed, much less refuted. Or maybe I wasn't clear?
1544:
because after 14 years it was clearly a stable title. Even if you don't believe it was established before that by the decade-plus-long usage and expansion of the page (and it
1054:. Some articles here use British English and some use American English, and the general rule is not to change them unless the topic is closely associated with one culture.
588:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the
207:
817:
in Fall 2015. Further details were available on the "Education
Program:Carleton University/Positive Psychology (Summer 2015)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.
1075:
was concerning this matter, I find its immediate return as topic number one when
Knowledge (XXG) is presented with this fresh, clean canvas both amousing and hilarios
1718:, lack the ability to understand or appreciate it, people of all backgrounds, ages, and cultures respond to humour. Though ultimately decided by subjective personal
662:
625:
536:
508:
160:
92:
1852:
1633:
498:
1917:
1822:
1877:
1867:
1039:
1017:
Yes, i know humour is the british way of spelling it, but since most of Knowledge (XXG) users come from the United States, should it not be spelled Humor?
615:
1124:
786:
678:
540:
363:
1857:
590:
474:
98:
1907:
1892:
1882:
1832:
776:
1366:
And all this is without engaging at all with the last RM discussion which was not a no-consensus close, but an actual consensus not to move (
1625:
1609:
1912:
1872:
1862:
1847:
43:
1276:
752:
1897:
1514:
This article is still misnammed as per ENGVAR and retain. Why should people not fight for what is correct by this sites own standards?
580:
531:
465:
426:
392:
1475:
1107:
1099:
1519:
1327:, and countless other variety-specific titles are stable; it has to do with following RETAIN guidance, not which side is reasonable.
1209:
discussion does not resolve the issue, use the variety found in the first post-stub revision that introduced an identifiable variety.
112:
1238:
117:
33:
330:
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
1902:
1887:
1211:. That's the rule that's relevant here, and it applies in this situation. Note that those two requirements are separated by an
814:
87:
1817:
1035:
743:
704:
401:
57:
1223:... imagine what will happen if the closer does find in favor of policy and community consensus and moves the title back to
78:
1650:
I would like to edit the beginning of this article. I have a proposed edit that I think is more scientific and objective.
1784:
307:
1237:, by the way, has remained stable with no controversy whatsoever since the 2011 RM close — almost ten years now! See:
955:
303:
181:
1031:
215:
198:
148:
122:
1258:
934:
226:
1729:
407:
1548:), it was surely determined then. If anything, the following seven+ years have only made it more convincing.
1424:
1355:
1094:. An overzealous British editor moved the article without rationale, and it's been contentious ever since.
995:
1027:
836:
1145:
That doesn't mean the principle shouldn't stand: it was moved for no reason, and it should be moved back.
311:
68:
1723:
922:
751:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
473:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
203:
142:
1368:
83:
1632:
until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
1440:
1402:
1345:
1283:
1245:
1080:
252:
1787:
1651:
378:
1791:
1655:
1150:
1003:
174:
138:
1529:
1497:
1228:
1200:
1091:
1051:
1719:
1417:
940:
231:
1722:
the extent to which a person finds something humorous depends on a host of variables, including
1363:. Re-opening naming disputes after changes from so long ago will clearly have a negative impact.
1783:
Sabato, G. (2019, June 26). What’s So Funny? The Science of Why We Laugh. Scientific American.
1680:
1566:
1180:
1002:
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
572:
458:
188:
64:
1292:"this title will remain controversial until it's moved back to the original spelling variety"
1266:
982:
936:
905:
265:
228:
1583:
1505:
1437:
1399:
1377:
1342:
1299:
1280:
1242:
1136:
1076:
274:
1748:
1715:
1701:
1146:
670:
654:
1806:
1785:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/whats-so-funnythe-science-of-why-we-laugh/
1752:
735:
154:
1758:
1736:
1676:
1160:
1057:
1675:, you would need to tell us what that proposed edit was, before we could make it.
1275:
Good luck with that. No sticks here that I can see. When all else fails, go with
1740:
1692:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1262:
441:
420:
1778:
Beeman, W. (1999). Humor. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 9(1/2), 103–106.
1579:
1501:
1386:
1373:
1308:
1295:
1277:
WP:Status quo stonewalling#Arguing against discussion by alleging time wasting
1132:
725:
585:
562:
470:
447:
1704:
which taught that the balance of fluids in the human body, known as humours (
1552:
pop up on this page to complain that the name is not their preferred version.
1773:
Attardo, S. (2023). Humor 2.0: How the Internet Changed Humor. Anthem Press.
1744:
1733:
1621:
1394:
1390:
1320:
1316:
879:
807:
719:
698:
1714:
Despite long-held beliefs that certain people, especially those considered
1090:
Actually, this should be at American English, as it was started there, see
302:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
1072:
1697:
1616:
729:
1726:
1630:
Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 2 § Facetious
990:
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
584:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to
1257:
It has been at this spelling since 2002. I think everyone should just
1838:
Knowledge (XXG) level-3 vital articles in Society and social sciences
1324:
1234:
840:
748:
37:
556:
525:
1705:
1224:
938:
230:
1620:
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
964:
941:
899:
822:
802:
372:
319:
260:
240:
232:
28:
15:
1828:
Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in Society and social sciences
1795:
1684:
1659:
1640:
1587:
1523:
1509:
1479:
1443:
1430:
1405:
1381:
1348:
1303:
1286:
1270:
1248:
1187:
1154:
1140:
1111:
1084:
1064:
1043:
885:
Images - perhaps a simple sight gag and a satirical cartoon?
669:
653:
1696:
humorous (Sabato, 2019). The term, humor, derives from the
1131:, though, so we should not change without a good reason.
1576:"I'm half thinking this is just the same IP every time."
1203:
is simply an objective approach to resolving conflicts:
1122:"unless there is some substantial reason for the change"
1570:
1411:
864:
858:
852:
846:
353:
343:
173:
1843:
C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
1711:, "body fluid"), controlled human health and emotion.
1528:
Because the current name is already established per
1356:
A review of this talk page (now on it's 4th archive)
747:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
469:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
636:
187:
994:] The anchor (#Incongruous juxtaposition theory)
1813:Knowledge (XXG) articles that use British English
1436:article until the original variety is restored. —
1646:Semi-protected edit request on 16 September 2023
46:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1743:For example, young children may appreciate the
1221:
1073:https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Humour/Archive_1
1205:When no English variety has been established
949:This page has archives. Sections older than
364:Knowledge (XXG):Move review/Log/2016 February
251:For discussion regarding spelling please use
8:
594:about philosophy content on Knowledge (XXG).
1050:That's not how Knowledge (XXG) works. See
1025:
693:
633:
520:
415:
278:, which has its own spelling conventions (
1636:An anonymous username, not my real name
695:
522:
417:
376:
1918:Knowledge (XXG) pages with to-do lists
1823:Knowledge (XXG) level-3 vital articles
1575:
1541:
1472:2A02:C7F:F042:B400:CCA4:4BA6:DD36:2485
1336:And that's the situation we have here.
1291:
1159:Policies don't apply retrospectively.
1104:2A02:C7F:C632:9200:ACBA:ABE6:660A:5EA1
1096:2A02:C7D:CA94:FB00:5887:6925:D47D:34A0
959:when more than 4 sections are present.
878:Evolution of humour (as in biological
600:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Philosophy
483:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Psychology
1538:is a consensus in favour of this name
1516:2A02:C7C:5AEF:1100:89C:435E:CB16:95EF
1279:. Sigh. —22:52, 5 April 2021 (UTC) --
1024:. Please contribute and don't hate.
310:, this should not be changed without
7:
741:This article is within the scope of
578:This article is within the scope of
463:This article is within the scope of
1853:High-importance psychology articles
813:This article was the subject of an
406:It is of interest to the following
36:for discussing improvements to the
1878:Mid-importance Aesthetics articles
1868:Mid-importance Philosophy articles
761:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Comedy
14:
1751:puppet shows or cartoons such as
1239:Talk:Yogurt/yogurtspellinghistory
1071:When so much of the discourse in
953:may be automatically archived by
63:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
1666:
1628:. This discussion will occur at
1615:
968:
904:
830:
806:
728:
718:
697:
565:
555:
524:
451:
440:
419:
386:
377:
323:
264:
244:
214:
58:Click here to start a new topic.
1858:WikiProject Psychology articles
781:This article has been rated as
620:This article has been rated as
603:Template:WikiProject Philosophy
503:This article has been rated as
486:Template:WikiProject Psychology
354:Requested move 12 February 2016
1908:Top-importance Comedy articles
1893:Mid-importance ethics articles
1883:Aesthetics task force articles
1833:C-Class level-3 vital articles
1796:18:12, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
1685:16:43, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
1660:16:28, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
1:
755:and see a list of open tasks.
477:and see a list of open tasks.
55:Put new text under old text.
1588:09:40, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
1524:16:36, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
1141:17:33, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
1085:14:14, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
1065:19:36, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
1044:21:50, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
344:Requested move 13 April 2015
1913:WikiProject Comedy articles
1873:C-Class Aesthetics articles
1863:C-Class Philosophy articles
1848:C-Class psychology articles
1641:06:49, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
1510:13:52, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
1393:is not a good example. But
1188:08:05, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
764:Template:WikiProject Comedy
1934:
1898:Ethics task force articles
1444:04:53, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
1431:20:07, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
1155:23:41, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
787:project's importance scale
626:project's importance scale
509:project's importance scale
1565:PS - I also endorse what
1480:21:59, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
1406:18:48, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
1382:11:22, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
1349:10:55, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
1304:07:51, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
1287:22:52, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
1271:22:43, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
1249:21:50, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
1112:23:12, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
780:
713:
677:
661:
632:
619:
550:
502:
435:
414:
93:Be welcoming to newcomers
22:Skip to table of contents
1610:Redirects for discussion
1573:, especially this part:
1571:above (back in 2017....)
21:
1903:C-Class Comedy articles
1888:C-Class ethics articles
1624:and has thus listed it
637:Associated task forces:
1818:C-Class vital articles
1724:geographical location,
1608:"Facetious" listed at
1233:
956:Lowercase sigmabot III
815:educational assignment
674:
658:
581:WikiProject Philosophy
466:WikiProject Psychology
88:avoid personal attacks
1410:When the variety was
1032:TsarNicholasTheSecond
673:
657:
400:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
393:level-3 vital article
208:Auto-archiving period
113:Neutral point of view
1555:The name change was
352:, 12 February 2016,
348:RM, Humour → Humor,
338:RM, Humour → Humor,
308:relevant style guide
304:varieties of English
253:Talk:Humour/Spelling
118:No original research
1542:"a slam dunk close"
606:Philosophy articles
489:psychology articles
306:. According to the
1500:. Drop the stick.
870:Updated 2012-11-29
744:WikiProject Comedy
675:
659:
591:general discussion
402:content assessment
358:MRV for above RM,
99:dispute resolution
60:
1562:! Drop the stick.
1185:
1046:
1030:comment added by
1010:
1009:
985:in most browsers.
963:
962:
928:
927:
896:
895:
821:
820:
801:
800:
797:
796:
793:
792:
692:
691:
688:
687:
684:
683:
573:Philosophy portal
519:
518:
515:
514:
459:Psychology portal
371:
370:
342:, 13 April 2015,
318:
317:
259:
258:
239:
238:
79:Assume good faith
56:
27:
26:
1925:
1698:humoral medicine
1674:
1670:
1669:
1638:
1619:
1427:
1420:
1389:, my apologies.
1210:
1181:
1060:
1020:Also, this is a
1013:Humor or Humour?
1004:Reporting errors
996:has been deleted
972:
971:
965:
958:
942:
919:
918:
908:
900:
871:
834:
833:
823:
810:
803:
769:
768:
765:
762:
759:
738:
733:
732:
722:
715:
714:
709:
701:
694:
644:
634:
608:
607:
604:
601:
598:
575:
570:
569:
568:
559:
552:
551:
546:
543:
528:
521:
491:
490:
487:
484:
481:
461:
456:
455:
454:
444:
437:
436:
431:
423:
416:
399:
390:
389:
382:
381:
373:
362:, 4 April 2016,
327:
326:
320:
271:This article is
268:
261:
248:
247:
241:
233:
219:
218:
209:
192:
191:
177:
108:Article policies
29:
16:
1933:
1932:
1928:
1927:
1926:
1924:
1923:
1922:
1803:
1802:
1747:humor found in
1702:ancient Greeks,
1667:
1665:
1648:
1634:
1613:
1425:
1418:
1259:WP:DROPTHESTICK
1204:
1058:
1015:
1006:
988:
987:
986:
969:
954:
943:
937:
913:
892:
891:
845:
831:
767:Comedy articles
766:
763:
760:
757:
756:
734:
727:
707:
642:
605:
602:
599:
596:
595:
571:
566:
564:
544:
534:
505:High-importance
488:
485:
482:
479:
478:
457:
452:
450:
430:High‑importance
429:
397:
387:
324:
312:broad consensus
275:British English
245:
235:
234:
229:
206:
134:
129:
128:
127:
104:
74:
12:
11:
5:
1931:
1929:
1921:
1920:
1915:
1910:
1905:
1900:
1895:
1890:
1885:
1880:
1875:
1870:
1865:
1860:
1855:
1850:
1845:
1840:
1835:
1830:
1825:
1820:
1815:
1805:
1804:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1781:
1779:
1776:
1774:
1771:
1769:
1766:
1749:Punch and Judy
1716:neurodivergent
1712:
1693:
1690:
1647:
1644:
1626:for discussion
1612:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1590:
1563:
1553:
1549:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1364:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1328:
1252:
1251:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1088:
1087:
1068:
1067:
1014:
1011:
1008:
1007:
1001:
1000:
999:
983:case-sensitive
977:
976:
975:
973:
961:
960:
948:
945:
944:
939:
935:
933:
930:
929:
926:
925:
915:
914:
909:
903:
894:
893:
890:
889:
886:
883:
873:
828:
826:
819:
818:
811:
799:
798:
795:
794:
791:
790:
783:Top-importance
779:
773:
772:
770:
753:the discussion
740:
739:
723:
711:
710:
708:Top‑importance
702:
690:
689:
686:
685:
682:
681:
676:
666:
665:
660:
650:
649:
647:
645:
639:
638:
630:
629:
622:Mid-importance
618:
612:
611:
609:
577:
576:
560:
548:
547:
545:Mid‑importance
529:
517:
516:
513:
512:
501:
495:
494:
492:
475:the discussion
462:
448:
445:
433:
432:
424:
412:
411:
405:
383:
369:
368:
367:
366:
356:
346:
328:
316:
315:
269:
257:
256:
249:
237:
236:
227:
225:
224:
221:
220:
194:
193:
131:
130:
126:
125:
120:
115:
106:
105:
103:
102:
95:
90:
81:
75:
73:
72:
61:
52:
51:
48:
47:
41:
25:
24:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1930:
1919:
1916:
1914:
1911:
1909:
1906:
1904:
1901:
1899:
1896:
1894:
1891:
1889:
1886:
1884:
1881:
1879:
1876:
1874:
1871:
1869:
1866:
1864:
1861:
1859:
1856:
1854:
1851:
1849:
1846:
1844:
1841:
1839:
1836:
1834:
1831:
1829:
1826:
1824:
1821:
1819:
1816:
1814:
1811:
1810:
1808:
1797:
1793:
1789:
1786:
1782:
1780:
1777:
1775:
1772:
1770:
1767:
1763:
1761:
1756:
1755:
1754:Tom and Jerry
1750:
1746:
1742:
1738:
1735:
1731:
1728:
1725:
1721:
1717:
1713:
1710:
1707:
1703:
1699:
1694:
1691:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1682:
1678:
1673:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1661:
1657:
1653:
1645:
1643:
1642:
1639:
1637:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1618:
1611:
1607:
1589:
1585:
1581:
1578:
1577:
1572:
1568:
1564:
1561:
1560:
1554:
1550:
1547:
1543:
1539:
1537:
1531:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1507:
1503:
1499:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1459:
1445:
1442:
1439:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1428:
1422:
1421:
1419:Crouch, Swale
1413:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1404:
1401:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1379:
1375:
1371:
1370:
1365:
1362:
1357:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1347:
1344:
1340:
1335:
1329:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1313:
1312:
1310:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1285:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1268:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1250:
1247:
1244:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1230:
1226:
1218:
1214:
1208:
1202:
1197:
1196:
1189:
1186:
1184:
1179:
1178:
1175:
1172:
1169:
1166:
1163:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1123:
1119:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1069:
1066:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1053:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1023:
1018:
1012:
1005:
997:
993:
992:
991:
984:
980:
974:
967:
966:
957:
952:
947:
946:
932:
931:
924:
921:
920:
917:
916:
912:
907:
902:
901:
898:
887:
884:
881:
877:
876:
875:
872:
869:
866:
863:
860:
857:
854:
851:
848:
844:
842:
838:
827:
825:
824:
816:
812:
809:
805:
804:
788:
784:
778:
775:
774:
771:
754:
750:
746:
745:
737:
736:Comedy portal
731:
726:
724:
721:
717:
716:
712:
706:
703:
700:
696:
680:
672:
668:
667:
664:
656:
652:
651:
648:
646:
641:
640:
635:
631:
627:
623:
617:
614:
613:
610:
593:
592:
587:
583:
582:
574:
563:
561:
558:
554:
553:
549:
542:
538:
533:
530:
527:
523:
510:
506:
500:
497:
496:
493:
476:
472:
468:
467:
460:
449:
446:
443:
439:
438:
434:
428:
425:
422:
418:
413:
409:
403:
395:
394:
384:
380:
375:
374:
365:
361:
357:
355:
351:
347:
345:
341:
337:
336:
335:
334:
333:Discussions:
329:
322:
321:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
276:
270:
267:
263:
262:
254:
250:
243:
242:
223:
222:
217:
213:
205:
202:
200:
196:
195:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
133:
132:
124:
123:Verifiability
121:
119:
116:
114:
111:
110:
109:
100:
96:
94:
91:
89:
85:
82:
80:
77:
76:
70:
66:
65:Learn to edit
62:
59:
54:
53:
50:
49:
45:
39:
35:
31:
30:
23:
20:
18:
17:
1760:Looney Toons
1759:
1753:
1737:intelligence
1708:
1671:
1649:
1635:
1614:
1574:
1567:Prinsgezinde
1559:20 years ago
1558:
1556:
1545:
1535:
1533:
1470:
1416:
1367:
1360:
1332:
1222:
1216:
1212:
1206:
1182:
1176:
1173:
1170:
1167:
1164:
1161:
1128:
1121:
1117:
1089:
1056:
1055:
1026:— Preceding
1021:
1019:
1016:
989:
981:Anchors are
978:
950:
910:
897:
874:
867:
861:
855:
849:
835:
829:
782:
742:
621:
589:
579:
504:
464:
408:WikiProjects
391:
359:
349:
340:No Consensus
339:
332:
331:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
272:
211:
197:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
107:
32:This is the
1361:two decades
1334:discussion.
273:written in
161:free images
44:not a forum
1807:Categories
1734:education,
1557:more than
1215:, meaning
1077:One cookie
1022:SUGGESTION
837:To-do list
663:Aesthetics
597:Philosophy
586:philosophy
537:Aesthetics
532:Philosophy
480:Psychology
471:Psychology
427:Psychology
1788:Jaypopism
1765:audience.
1745:slapstick
1732:level of
1730:maturity,
1652:Jaypopism
1622:Facetious
1530:WP:RETAIN
1498:WP:RETAIN
1395:Liquorice
1391:Aluminium
1321:Aluminium
1317:Aluminium
1261:on this.
1229:WP:RETAIN
1201:WP:RETAIN
1147:Eccekevin
1092:WP:ENGVAR
1052:WP:ENGVAR
923:Archive 1
880:evolution
396:is rated
350:Not Moved
284:travelled
101:if needed
84:Be polite
34:talk page
1768:Sources:
1741:context.
1727:culture,
1672:Not done
1040:contribs
1028:unsigned
911:Archives
888:Examples
360:Endorsed
296:artefact
199:Archives
69:get help
42:This is
40:article.
1700:of the
1677:Belbury
1536:already
1412:changed
1125:in 2005
1118:Comment
1059:Hut 8.5
951:45 days
865:refresh
853:history
785:on the
624:on the
507:on the
398:C-class
300:analyse
292:defence
212:45 days
167:WP refs
155:scholar
1720:taste,
1706:Latin:
1534:There
1461:Humor.
1325:Yogurt
1263:Meters
1235:Yogurt
841:Humour
758:Comedy
749:comedy
705:Comedy
679:Ethics
541:Ethics
404:scale.
288:centre
280:colour
139:Google
38:Humour
1709:humor
1580:FOARP
1569:said
1502:FOARP
1387:FOARP
1374:FOARP
1309:FOARP
1296:FOARP
1241:. --
1225:Humor
1133:FOARP
859:watch
385:This
182:JSTOR
143:books
97:Seek
1792:talk
1739:and
1681:talk
1656:talk
1584:talk
1520:talk
1506:talk
1476:talk
1426:talk
1378:talk
1300:talk
1267:talk
1227:per
1217:both
1183:TALK
1151:talk
1137:talk
1108:talk
1100:talk
1081:talk
1036:talk
979:Tip:
847:edit
839:for
499:High
175:FENS
149:news
86:and
1757:or
1546:was
1438:В²C
1429:)
1400:В²C
1343:В²C
1281:В²C
1243:В²C
1213:and
1207:and
1129:now
777:Top
616:Mid
189:TWL
1809::
1794:)
1683:)
1658:)
1586:)
1532:.
1522:)
1508:)
1478:)
1380:)
1323:,
1302:)
1269:)
1171:ge
1153:)
1139:)
1110:)
1083:)
1042:)
1038:•
643:/
539:/
535::
298:,
294:,
290:,
286:,
282:,
210::
169:)
67:;
1790:(
1762:,
1679:(
1654:(
1582:(
1518:(
1504:(
1474:(
1441:☎
1423:(
1403:☎
1398:—
1376:(
1346:☎
1341:—
1298:(
1284:☎
1265:(
1246:☎
1177:s
1174:r
1168:g
1165:a
1162:W
1149:(
1135:(
1106:(
1098:(
1079:(
1034:(
998:.
882:)
868:·
862:·
856:·
850:·
843::
789:.
628:.
511:.
410::
314:.
255:.
204:1
201::
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
71:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
