315:
224:
203:
32:
434:
172:
379:
505:
86:
234:
594:
I did a Mensa iq test (not official test that you can use to apply) and my result was a score of 135. It asked to enter my age, and the youngest was 16. Being 13 years old, I selected that since it was closest. But it may not be accurate, since age can make a difference, so I’m wondering if my score
450:
In popular media, you see lots of articles talking about how so and so has an IQ of 200-250 or something ridiculous. Since this is not feasible with most reliable tests, should there be a section discussing this?
611:
596:
127:
517:
43:
96:
426:
639:
290:
121:
649:
521:
280:
659:
422:
654:
256:
57:
644:
513:
497:
458:
140:
634:
615:
600:
247:
208:
560:
49:
541:
Terman's
Stanford–Binet original (1916) classification IQ Range ("ratio IQ") IQ Classification Above 140 "Near" genius or genius
331:
183:
538:
its missing the lower half of the average range. Looking at the source, “normal or average” should be 90-110. Not 110
364:
64:
343:
155:
189:
564:
462:
454:
31:
579:
394:
255:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
520:
until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
483:
135:
53:
349:
378:
509:
414:
239:
556:
70–80 Border-line deficiency, sometimes classifiable as dullness, often as feeble-mindedness
595:
would have been lower or something? Could anyone give an estimate On what it may have been?
575:
345:
314:
479:
476:
101:
17:
628:
399:
223:
202:
518:
Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 6#I.Q. test results
252:
229:
347:
389:
619:
604:
583:
568:
528:
487:
466:
504:
409:
149:
116:
85:
94:
for
Knowledge (XXG)'s health content are defined in the guideline
508:
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
373:
350:
308:
165:
80:
26:
432:
553:
80–90 Dullness, rarely classifiable as feeble-mindedness
97:
Knowledge (XXG):Identifying reliable sources (medicine)
70:
610:
Ik it isn’t iq classification related really, but yea
425:. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
475:
Not unless there’s a reliable source, otherwise it’s
251:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
427:
Template:Did you know nominations/IQ classification
141:
clinical publications about evidence-based medicine
56:. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
423:Knowledge (XXG):Recent additions/2013/October
358:This page has archives. Sections older than
8:
452:
197:
640:Social sciences and society good articles
402:). The text of the entry was as follows:
44:Social sciences and society good articles
122:review articles from the past five years
612:2A00:23C5:DB42:2201:9C6A:B0B2:253A:677F
597:2A00:23C5:DB42:2201:9C6A:B0B2:253A:677F
524:An anonymous username, not my real name
433:
199:
368:when more than 4 sections are present.
265:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Psychology
660:Knowledge (XXG) Did you know articles
550:110 Normal, or average, intelligence
421:A record of the entry may be seen at
7:
559:Below 70 Definite feeble-mindedness
245:This article is within the scope of
171:
169:
150:Centre for Reviews and Dissemination
650:High-importance psychology articles
544:120–140 Very superior intelligence
188:It is of interest to the following
25:
362:may be automatically archived by
147:Other potential sources include:
52:. If you can improve it further,
516:. This discussion will occur at
503:
377:
313:
232:
222:
201:
170:
84:
30:
655:WikiProject Psychology articles
446:Section on pop culture High IQs
285:This article has been rated as
268:Template:WikiProject Psychology
547:110–120 Superior intelligence
496:"I.Q. test results" listed at
412:" has not been a term used in
388:appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s
40:has been listed as one of the
1:
635:Knowledge (XXG) good articles
488:16:18, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
259:and see a list of open tasks.
108:sources of information about
645:GA-Class psychology articles
529:02:24, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
467:14:41, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
676:
398:column on 2 October 2013 (
291:project's importance scale
620:13:05, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
605:13:03, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
284:
217:
196:
584:01:27, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
569:01:24, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
498:Redirects for discussion
512:and has thus listed it
18:Talk:IQ reference chart
438:
365:Lowercase sigmabot III
248:WikiProject Psychology
178:This article is rated
436:
182:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
50:good article criteria
590:Score for an iq test
128:free review articles
104:. Here are links to
68:: August 29, 2014. (
271:psychology articles
439:
184:content assessment
100:and are typically
510:I.Q. test results
469:
457:comment added by
443:
442:
415:IQ classification
386:IQ classification
372:
371:
337:
336:
305:
304:
301:
300:
297:
296:
240:Psychology portal
164:
163:
110:IQ classification
79:
78:
75:
38:IQ classification
16:(Redirected from
667:
526:
507:
435:
381:
374:
367:
351:
328:
327:
317:
309:
273:
272:
269:
266:
263:
242:
237:
236:
235:
226:
219:
218:
213:
205:
198:
181:
175:
174:
173:
166:
88:
81:
73:
71:Reviewed version
62:
34:
27:
21:
675:
674:
670:
669:
668:
666:
665:
664:
625:
624:
592:
536:
522:
501:
448:
437:Knowledge (XXG)
363:
352:
346:
322:
287:High-importance
270:
267:
264:
261:
260:
238:
233:
231:
212:High‑importance
211:
179:
106:possibly useful
102:review articles
69:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
673:
671:
663:
662:
657:
652:
647:
642:
637:
627:
626:
623:
622:
591:
588:
587:
586:
574:done, Thanks.
535:
532:
514:for discussion
500:
494:
493:
492:
491:
490:
447:
444:
441:
440:
430:
420:
419:
382:
370:
369:
357:
354:
353:
348:
344:
342:
339:
338:
335:
334:
324:
323:
318:
312:
303:
302:
299:
298:
295:
294:
283:
277:
276:
274:
257:the discussion
244:
243:
227:
215:
214:
206:
194:
193:
187:
176:
162:
161:
160:
159:
145:
132:
113:
89:
77:
76:
61:
35:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
672:
661:
658:
656:
653:
651:
648:
646:
643:
641:
638:
636:
633:
632:
630:
621:
617:
613:
609:
608:
607:
606:
602:
598:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
572:
571:
570:
566:
562:
557:
554:
551:
548:
545:
542:
539:
534:This is wrong
533:
531:
530:
527:
525:
519:
515:
511:
506:
499:
495:
489:
485:
481:
478:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
468:
464:
460:
459:65.27.204.252
456:
445:
431:
428:
424:
417:
416:
411:
407:
404:
403:
401:
397:
396:
391:
387:
383:
380:
376:
375:
366:
361:
356:
355:
341:
340:
333:
330:
329:
326:
325:
321:
316:
311:
310:
307:
292:
288:
282:
279:
278:
275:
258:
254:
250:
249:
241:
230:
228:
225:
221:
220:
216:
210:
207:
204:
200:
195:
191:
185:
177:
168:
167:
158:
157:
152:
151:
146:
143:
142:
137:
136:TRIP database
133:
130:
129:
124:
123:
118:
115:
114:
111:
107:
103:
99:
98:
93:
92:Ideal sources
90:
87:
83:
82:
72:
67:
66:
59:
55:
51:
47:
46:
45:
39:
36:
33:
29:
28:
19:
593:
561:68.55.76.245
558:
555:
552:
549:
546:
543:
540:
537:
523:
502:
453:— Preceding
449:
413:
406:Did you know
405:
395:Did you know
393:
385:
384:A fact from
359:
319:
306:
286:
246:
190:WikiProjects
154:
148:
139:
126:
120:
109:
105:
95:
91:
63:
54:please do so
42:
41:
37:
576:Moons of Io
418:since 1937?
400:check views
629:Categories
480:Dronebogus
408:... that "
262:Psychology
253:Psychology
209:Psychology
125:(limit to
48:under the
390:Main Page
332:Archive 1
138:provides
119:provides
455:unsigned
360:180 days
320:Archives
180:GA-class
58:reassess
392:in the
289:on the
410:genius
186:scale.
117:PubMed
65:Review
477:WP:OR
616:talk
601:talk
580:talk
565:talk
484:talk
463:talk
281:High
153:and
134:The
156:CDC
60:it.
631::
618:)
603:)
582:)
567:)
486:)
465:)
74:).
614:(
599:(
578:(
563:(
482:(
461:(
429:.
293:.
192::
144:.
131:)
112:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
