Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Intangible asset

Source đź“ť

681:
have been designing ways to link intangible assets to the place where they were created, hence defining nexus. In addition, as intangible assets seem to generate above-average returns , governments have designed several ways to promote investment in these assets. For instance, governments typically provide a variety of back-end tax incentives including tax credits, super-deductions, or accelerated depreciation, though mainly for R&D. Several economists have evaluated the effectiveness of tax incentives for R&D or studied how the interactions between intangible assets and physical assets might affect the effectiveness of tax policy. A few countries also provide front-end incentives, mostly designed tax rebates (reduced corporate tax rates) for R&D income, known as Intellectual Property Box regimes (IP Box) or Patent Box regimes.
421: 671:
their National Income and Product Accounts (NIPA), no country has included a comprehensive measure of intangible assets. Yet, economists recognize the growing contribution of intangible assets in long-term GDP growth. In 2013, the United States’ Department of Commerce announced its first comprehensive revision of NIPA accounts to include two types of intangible assets, published as “satellite accounts” and including R&D and investment in artistic originals (mainly motion pictures and sound recordings).
80: 53: 205: 184: 156: 661:
they generally--though not necessarily--suffer from typical market failures of non-rivalry and non-excludability because they are difficult to identify and measure. The lists and recovery periods of intangible assets might differ for accounting- and tax- purposes. For example, organizational skills are generally not treated as intangible assets for tax-purposes but might be recognized for legal purposes.
22: 310: 289: 215: 90: 386: 660:
It would be worth mentioning in the introduction that above all an intangible asset is a source of future benefit, like physical assets (machinery, software, buildings). The main difference with physical assets is that intangible assets lack physical form or substance. Also, contrary to other assets,
631:
While it may be true it is very difficult to prove and academic research on the subject is tentative at best. Furthermore, for something to be classified as a development cost it must satisfy 6 requirements that are not easy to circumvent. Finally, if managers wish to manipulate reported earnings for
562:
Second, recognition criteria set forth under IAS does not distinguish the origin of the intangible asset. The recognition criteria set forth in IAS 38.9-24 applies equally to externally acquired intangible assets and internally generated intangible assets. The only difference being that for interally
690:
The article also forgets to mention important facts about the measurement of intangible assets. Economists and accountants have developed a variety of methods to approximate most intangible assets, which one can divide in two groups: resource-based approaches in which the measurement is based on the
554:
Anyway, I've noticed that in the article there is the folloinw description under Financial Accounting: "In general, legal intangibles that are developed internally are not recognized and legal intangibles that are purchased from third-parties are recognized. Wordings are similar to IAS 9" This might
550:
Hi, first of all, this is my first time posting a comment, so if I did something worng, I apologize and please let me know how it can be done. Also, maybe I missed it but I cannot find anywhere within the discussion to reply or post a comment, editing the page was the only way I could of done it. If
680:
Given the growing importance of intangible assets as a source of economic growth and tax revenue, as well as the fact that their non-physical nature makes it easier for taxpayers to engage in tax strategies such as income-shifting or transfer pricing, tax authorities and international organizations
566:
Saying "In general, internally generated intangible assets are not recognized" could be quite misleading. As it does not appear anywhere within IAS 38 and I don't believe it is generally accepted business practice to expense all expenditures on internally generated intangible assets. If this is the
626:
The classification of research and development expenditure can be highly subjective, and it is important to note that organisations may have an ulterior motive in its classification of research and development expenditure. Less scrupulous directors may manipulate financial statements through their
670:
The authors should mention that R&D is considered as one among several other intangible assets (e.g., about 16 percent of all intangible assets in the US), even if most countries treat R&D as current expense for both legal and tax purposes. While most countries report some intangibles in
506:
If a company purchases another company (or a part of it), goodwill is the "difference" between the net assets (Assets - Liabilities) and what was paid for the business/segment. Goodwill can be positive, representing the purchaser believes there is extra value in the business, or there can be
599:
The new lead section adopts a familiar textbook approach to the definition of an intangible asset. It describes the "evolution" of the intangible asset definition beginning with the Australian standards prior to 2005, then proceeding to IASB and FASB definitions. It provides examples of what
691:
amount of spending required to generate intangibles (such as R&D expenses or compensation of employees engaged in research), or output-based approaches where measurement is based on the amount of value-added generated by intangible assets (e.g., royalty income from licensing patents).
595:
Hi everyone, just a quick introduction about myself as this is my first contribution to Knowledge (XXG). I am a qualified accountant and an early-career academic. I have a particular interest in intangible assets, hence the selection of this article to be my first. :)
558:
First I am confused with the phrase "legal intangibles". Looking at IAS 38, and after I have read most of the (2009 version) IFRS/IAS sections,(part of my job) I have not come across the term legal intangibles in IFRS. So I am not sure what it refers to.
529:
Adding the classification of cash flow activity that intangible assets are would be beneficial. I believe it's an investing activity (rather than operating or financing). However I can't find any evidence supporting this, so I'll leave it to the experts!
802:
Evers, Lisa; Helen Miller; Christoph Spengel. 2015. "Intellectual property box regimes: effective tax rates and tax policy considerations." International Tax and Public Finance. International Tax and Public Finance. June 2015, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp 502-30.
496:
does. McDonalds owns the name and classifies it as an intangible. This helps McDonalds because nobody else can use the name. If someone does use the anem and McDonalds takes them to court and wins, the extra legal costs can be capitalized and
833:: Estelle P. Dauchy & Sophia Chen, 2014. "Tax-adjusted Q Model with Intangible Assets: Theory and Evidence from Temporary Investment Tax Incentives," Working Papers w0207, Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR). 716:
For examples of resource-based and output-based approaches to measuring intangible assets, see Lev, Baruch. (2005). "Intangible Assets: Concepts and Measurements." Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, Vol. 2. Elsevier Inc.
437: 632:
any reason it's not a matter for accounting standards, ultimately auditors will pass judgement on whether a particular cost falls into either the research or development phase. What do you think?
768:
Warda, Jacek (2006), "Tax Treatment of Business Investments in Intellectual Assets: An International Comparison", OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2006/4, OECD Publishing.
364: 904: 354: 492:
Intangible assets are hard to get your hands around (sorry, had to use the pun). Intangible assets provide a company or organization an economic benefit in the same way every other
165: 63: 909: 899: 864: 136: 330: 796:
See also: Mahon, James, and Eric Zwick. 2014. “Do Financial Frictions Amplify Fiscal Policy? Evidence from Business Investment Stimulus.” Harvard University Working Paper.
859: 789:
Chen, Sophia, and Estelle P. Dauchy. 2015. "Tax-Adjusted Q Model with Intangible Assets: Theory and Evidence from Temporary Investment Tax Incentives." Available at SSRN:
563:
generated intangible assets, only expenditures incurred under development phase can be capitalize, and they are subject to an additional set of recognition criteria.
317: 294: 762:
Megna, Pamela; Dennis C. Mueller. (1991). "Profit Rates and Intangible Capital." The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 73, No. 4., November, pp. 632-42.
700:
Webster, Elisabeth; Jensen, Paul H. (2006). "Investment in Intangible Capital: An Enterprise Perspective." The Economic Record, Vol. 82, No. 256, March, 82-96.
732:
Corrado, Carol. Charles Hulten, and Daniel Sichel. (2006). "Intangible Capital and Economic Growth." Federal Reserve Board Discussion Paper N. 2006-24. April.
271: 146: 889: 783:
Hall, Bronwyn, and John Van Reenen. 2000. "How Effective Are Fiscal Incentives for R&D? A Review of the Evidence." Research Policy, 29(4-5): 449-69.
261: 567:
case, then it would be hard to explain why IAS 38.51-67 is included, which explicitly discuss how to recognize internally generated intangible assets.
869: 894: 884: 237: 879: 914: 112: 603:
Hopefully the new edit is helpful. I plan to make more revisions to this article as it is quite inaccurate and lacking in many respects.
600:
intangibles are and how the definitions describe what they are not (but are commonly mistaken by first-year students to be intangibles).
754: 228: 189: 103: 58: 774:
For R&D tax incentives, see OECD. (2013). " Maximizing the benefits of R&D tax incentives for innovation." Available at
414: 723:
Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2013). ” Preview of the 2013 Comprehensive Revision of the National Income and Product Accounts.”
410: 820:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
33: 724: 747:"Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting." (2013). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 220: 809:.For information on existing data in OECD countries, see Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 406: 874: 653:
Dr. Dauchy has reviewed this Knowledge (XXG) page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
753:
See also: PriceWaterHouseCoopers: "BEPS Action Plan: Action 8 – Transfer pricing and intangibles," 24 September 2014.
738:
See also: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), "New sources of growth: intangible assets":
707: 639: 608: 111:
articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
841: 39: 21: 579: 425: 823:
Dr. Dauchy has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Knowledge (XXG) article:
329:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
236:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
574: 733: 635: 604: 845: 837: 535: 755:
http://www.pwc.com/gx/en/tax/tax-policy-administration/beps/transfer-pricing-and-intangibles.jhtml
706:
For a list of intangible assets that can be amortized for tax purposes in the United States, see:
79: 52: 775: 512: 454:
this article equates "physical" with "easily convertible (into money)". Is this justified?
95: 570:
Knowledge (XXG) has been an useful tool for me, so I figure I would put in my 2 cents.
725:
http://www.bea.gov/scb/pdf/2013/03%20March/0313_nipa_comprehensive_revision_preview.pdf
531: 853: 204: 183: 551:
anyone can show me where I can just simply "start a thread" that would be great.
480: 474:. What matters seems to be not the size of the customer base, but its fidelity. 708:
http://www.irs.gov/Businesses/Small-Businesses-&-Self-Employed/Intangibles
326: 210: 155: 85: 748: 739: 233: 813: 643: 612: 583: 539: 515: 309: 288: 214: 89: 812:"Measuring Intangibles to Understand and Improve Innovation Management." 108: 321:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to 322: 429: 790: 493: 734:
http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2006/200624/200624pap.pdf
457:
the only example given in the introduction is a negative example.
380: 15: 776:
http://www.oecd.org/sti/rd-tax-incentives-for-innovation.pdf
384: 154: 464:. Are there other examples? Should the article be renamed? 627:
classification of research and development expenditure.
413:. Please replace this template with a more specific 339:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Finance & Investment
232:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 107:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 511:goodwill. You seem to have customer base right... 905:Low-importance Finance & Investment articles 658: 910:WikiProject Finance & Investment articles 900:Start-Class Finance & Investment articles 342:Template:WikiProject Finance & Investment 8: 865:Mid-importance WikiProject Business articles 19: 749:http://www.oecd.org/ctp/BEPSActionPlan.pdf 283: 178: 47: 860:Start-Class WikiProject Business articles 740:http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/46349020.pdf 622:I propose the removal of this paragraph: 503:Yes. No, it does not need to be renamed. 428:may be able to locate suitable images on 814:http://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/1947863.pdf 648: 285: 180: 49: 246:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Economics 7: 649:Dr. Dauchy's comment on this article 618:Discussion about the R&D section 318:WikiProject Finance & Investment 315:This article is within the scope of 226:This article is within the scope of 121:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Business 101:This article is within the scope of 460:the only content of the article is 38:It is of interest to the following 14: 890:Low-importance Economics articles 426:Openverse Creative Commons Search 345:Finance & Investment articles 915:Knowledge (XXG) requested images 791:http://ssrn.com/abstract=2599065 308: 287: 213: 203: 182: 88: 78: 51: 20: 870:Start-Class Accounting articles 359:This article has been rated as 266:This article has been rated as 141:This article has been rated as 895:WikiProject Economics articles 885:Start-Class Economics articles 249:Template:WikiProject Economics 1: 880:WikiProject Business articles 644:08:56, 19 December 2012 (UTC) 613:05:07, 19 December 2012 (UTC) 333:and see a list of open tasks. 240:and see a list of open tasks. 221:Business and economics portal 163:This article is supported by 127:WikiProject Business articles 124:Template:WikiProject Business 115:and see a list of open tasks. 584:18:23, 26 October 2009 (UTC) 540:00:54, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 516:14:55, 13 August 2005 (UTC) 931: 365:project's importance scale 272:project's importance scale 147:project's importance scale 771:doi:10.1787/672304513676 358: 303: 265: 198: 166:the Accounting task force 162: 140: 73: 46: 846:17:30, 3 June 2015 (UTC) 591:Changed the lead section 393:It is requested that an 336:Finance & Investment 295:Finance & Investment 546:Inaccurate discription? 817: 629: 422:Free Image Search Tool 415:media request template 389: 159: 28:This article is rated 677:More about taxation: 624: 500:I think I fixed that. 388: 229:WikiProject Economics 158: 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 667:More about R&D: 432:and other web sites. 104:WikiProject Business 875:Accounting articles 411:improve its quality 409:in this article to 555:not be accurate." 390: 252:Economics articles 160: 34:content assessment 446: 445: 433: 379: 378: 375: 374: 371: 370: 282: 281: 278: 277: 177: 176: 173: 172: 922: 587: 524:General Comments 442: 440: 419: 417:where possible. 403:Intangible asset 387: 381: 347: 346: 343: 340: 337: 312: 305: 304: 299: 291: 284: 254: 253: 250: 247: 244: 223: 218: 217: 207: 200: 199: 194: 186: 179: 129: 128: 125: 122: 119: 98: 93: 92: 82: 75: 74: 69: 66: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 930: 929: 925: 924: 923: 921: 920: 919: 850: 849: 651: 636:Shaun Steenkamp 620: 605:Shaun Steenkamp 593: 577: 548: 526: 451: 438: 436: 385: 344: 341: 338: 335: 334: 297: 251: 248: 245: 242: 241: 219: 212: 192: 126: 123: 120: 117: 116: 96:Business portal 94: 87: 67: 61: 29: 12: 11: 5: 928: 926: 918: 917: 912: 907: 902: 897: 892: 887: 882: 877: 872: 867: 862: 852: 851: 838:ExpertIdeasBot 835: 834: 826: 819: 806: 799: 786: 780: 765: 759: 744: 729: 720: 713: 703: 694: 684: 674: 664: 656: 650: 647: 619: 616: 592: 589: 582:comment added 547: 544: 543: 542: 525: 522: 521: 520: 519: 518: 504: 501: 498: 478: 476: 475: 465: 458: 455: 450: 447: 444: 443: 434: 418: 391: 377: 376: 373: 372: 369: 368: 361:Low-importance 357: 351: 350: 348: 331:the discussion 313: 301: 300: 298:Low‑importance 292: 280: 279: 276: 275: 268:Low-importance 264: 258: 257: 255: 238:the discussion 225: 224: 208: 196: 195: 193:Low‑importance 187: 175: 174: 171: 170: 161: 151: 150: 143:Mid-importance 139: 133: 132: 130: 113:the discussion 100: 99: 83: 71: 70: 68:Mid‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 927: 916: 913: 911: 908: 906: 903: 901: 898: 896: 893: 891: 888: 886: 883: 881: 878: 876: 873: 871: 868: 866: 863: 861: 858: 857: 855: 848: 847: 843: 839: 832: 829: 828: 827: 824: 821: 816: 815: 810: 807: 804: 800: 797: 794: 792: 787: 784: 781: 778: 777: 772: 769: 766: 763: 760: 757: 756: 751: 750: 745: 742: 741: 736: 735: 730: 727: 726: 721: 718: 714: 711: 709: 704: 701: 698: 695: 692: 688: 685: 682: 678: 675: 672: 668: 665: 662: 657: 654: 646: 645: 641: 637: 633: 628: 623: 617: 615: 614: 610: 606: 601: 597: 590: 588: 585: 581: 576: 571: 568: 564: 560: 556: 552: 545: 541: 537: 533: 528: 527: 523: 517: 514: 510: 505: 502: 499: 495: 491: 490: 488: 485: 484: 483: 482: 473: 472:customer base 469: 466: 463: 459: 456: 453: 452: 448: 441: 435: 431: 427: 423: 416: 412: 408: 404: 400: 396: 392: 383: 382: 366: 362: 356: 353: 352: 349: 332: 328: 324: 320: 319: 314: 311: 307: 306: 302: 296: 293: 290: 286: 273: 269: 263: 260: 259: 256: 239: 235: 231: 230: 222: 216: 211: 209: 206: 202: 201: 197: 191: 188: 185: 181: 168: 167: 157: 153: 152: 148: 144: 138: 135: 134: 131: 114: 110: 106: 105: 97: 91: 86: 84: 81: 77: 76: 72: 65: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 836: 830: 825: 822: 818: 811: 808: 805: 801: 798: 795: 788: 785: 782: 779: 773: 770: 767: 764: 761: 758: 752: 746: 743: 737: 731: 728: 722: 719: 715: 712: 705: 702: 699: 697:References: 696: 693: 689: 687:Measurement 686: 683: 679: 676: 673: 669: 666: 663: 659: 655: 652: 634: 630: 625: 621: 602: 598: 594: 575:phatpanda114 572: 569: 565: 561: 557: 553: 549: 508: 486: 477: 471: 467: 461: 402: 398: 394: 360: 316: 267: 227: 164: 142: 102: 40:WikiProjects 578:—Preceding 30:Start-class 854:Categories 831:Reference 497:amortized. 399:photograph 327:Investment 64:Accounting 532:Mike.Suro 489:Answers: 487:Hopefully 449:Questions 243:Economics 234:Economics 190:Economics 509:negative 468:goodwill 462:goodwill 407:included 118:Business 109:business 59:Business 580:undated 363:on the 323:Finance 270:on the 145:on the 481:Miguel 439:Upload 430:Flickr 36:scale. 494:asset 395:image 842:talk 640:talk 609:talk 536:talk 513:Zoop 470:and 420:The 325:and 573:-- 479:-- 424:or 405:be 401:of 397:or 355:Low 262:Low 137:Mid 856:: 844:) 793:. 710:. 642:) 611:) 538:) 62:: 840:( 638:( 607:( 586:. 534:( 367:. 274:. 169:. 149:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Business
Accounting
WikiProject icon
icon
Business portal
WikiProject Business
business
the discussion
Mid
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
the Accounting task force
WikiProject icon
Economics
WikiProject icon
icon
Business and economics portal
WikiProject Economics
Economics
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Finance & Investment
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Finance & Investment

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑