967:
doing anything to "stem the rot", as it were. This is preposterous. Just two examples suffice: 1) The Sawai
Gandharva Music Festival held every year since 1953 in Pune, and 2) The Margazhi Dance and Music Festival held in Chennai every year since the 1920s (also called the Madras Music Season). They are broadly devoted to Hindustani and Carnatic traditions, respectively, and draw huge gatherings. The Margazhi festival in particular, is considered one of the largest cultural events in the World as it is spread over six weeks with over a thousand performances. These festivals are vibrant expressions of a continuing tradition, and showcase new artistes entering the fold of ICM. There are many more such festivals spread over India. Indeed it is hard not to encounter a performance or kacheri in any city on any day. So, the idea that ICM is going out of favor is absolutely incorrect.
963:
supplanted by fusion. Fusion is a remarkable and new direction which Indian and
Western music are taking and there is no need to go into it here (it deserves a page of its own), but neither is it pertinent to suggest that fusion is one reason that ICM is going out of favor. In the same context, why is it necessary to mention that Pandit Ravi Shankar collaborated with Western musicians? Does this suggest that Ravi Shankar is partly or wholly responsible for ICM going "out of favor"? On the whole the first paragraph of this section is poor in content and does not support the assertion that ICM is going out of favor.
200:
251:
233:
357:
435:
330:
191:
367:
261:
966:
The second and final paragraph is even less helpful. It makes a somewhat desperate appeal to the existence of
Sangeet Sankalp and SPIC MACAY. While these organizations are important for maintaining and sustaining ICM in India and abroad, the wording conveys the mistaken impression that no one else is
754:
Au contraire: Indian classical music is fundamentally influenced by
Persian music. The sitar, the sarod; much of the lyrical content of modern Indian Classical Music is Persian in origin. To say whether it's Pakistan or India, however, is pretty irrelevant in the long-term context of the 'classical'
662:
Nobody knows what the "original" form of Indian classical music was. There are references to jatis, which are supposed to be the precursors of ragas. In any case, both the
Hindustani and Carnatic styles have evolved separately since roughly the 13th century, and they are different enough to require
970:
One minor but curious point concerns the use of the word "genre". In the final paragraph it is stated that "Nonetheless, several organisations continue to promote this genre." What exactly is the genre that is being referred to? Is Indian classical music a genre? Is this appropriate usage? Genres
834:
The lists of notable vocalists and instrumentalists are not great. Ideally, there should be a sentence or two for each musician, outlining his/her contributions. For example, BGAK's introduction of the tappa style into the thumri, or AK's innovative use of pause and merukhandi patterns. Everyone
772:
Elliotb2 is incorrect in many ways. There is nothing fundamental about any influence on Indian
Classical music. Most influences are peripheral. Rhythm/Tala and Raga are fundamental to indian music playing it on guitar does not make it "indian music is fundamentally influenced by western music".
515:
Both vocalists and instrumentalists are mentioned now. Faiyaz Khan, Abdul Karim Khan, Amir Khan, Bade Ghulam Ali Khan are all mentioned. Dhrupad and Khyal are both mentioned, along with semiclassical forms. More info about the forms is on their respective WP pages. So can this ("Gross Errors")
962:
This section (with the above title) is not only sketchy but misleading, misinformed, and not fully presenting the facts as they stand. It would require an entire wiki page to go into the status of Indian classical music (ICM) today, but ICM is certainly not going out of favor nor is it being
726:
Please do not put incorrect information on this article, like saying indian classical music is influenced by
Persian music. Indian classical music has no component conforming with Persian music. It is the Ghazal music (which is not classical) which has some middle eastern orientation. Please
683:
Ustad Ashraf Ali Khan ANd Ustad
Muharam Ali Khan (taught by Ustad huzoor bux khan mirasi) was well known for indian classical rag khayal ghazal thumri and kafiz (sindhi classical music kafi)of sufi saints, belong with a city kambar at larkana located in sindh, PAKISTAN.
971:
refer to conventions that change over time. They refer to fluctuating conventions in the art where new forms originate and old forms die, i.e., give rise to new genres. ICM is not a genre in this sense, just as Jazz and
Western classical music are not.
560:
I think it makes more sense to have a page which lumps all Indian classical music together, treating it as a valid "classical" tradition, the distinction of which has been clearly commented on by musicians such as Ravi
Shankar, than one which lumps
484:
There also seems to be useless information such as "..the audiences applaud.." This may or may not true, and is not related to the dogma of Indian classical music. Jor movements sometimes have tabla accompaniment, but nothing to that effect is
510:
The list of exponents of classical music given in both the genres seems biased heavily towards vocalists... and towards musicians of the later part of 20th century... for example, there is no mention of bade ghulam ali khan.
153:
625:
Is Indian classical music necessarily (or at all) connected to the discipline of Kundalini? I think the relation is not important enough for 1st paragraph mention. I hesitate to edit because I know little about
919:
473:
There also seems to be no mention of the Dhrupad style of singin which came prior to the khyal style the four styles in dhrupad viz the Baanis ' the Dagar , he Khandar The Guahar and the Nauhar baani
292:
288:
835:
composes new bandishes, though, so that doesn't need to be mentioned. Anyway, something like that would show that ICM is evolving (within the boundaries of the tradition), not stagnating.
860:
uses it when discussing the totality of the classical tradition in India and I've seen it used in that way as opposed to "Classical music of India" in scholarly works and by the national
1127:
1040:
1020:
in Hindustani classical music, not in Carnatic classical music. But, I want to be sure, if I have true, or not. Please, how is It with Harmonium in Indian classical music? Thank You.
586:
I want this page, it is easily found from the Hindu Music page which allowed me to easily find stuff. I don't want some massive article that is hard to find the information I need
478:
There are some serious errors, but I am adverse to editing them because I would not know how to concisely explain some of the concepts which deserve full pages unto themselves.
147:
279:
238:
1112:
1082:
854:
The article was recently moved to "Classical music of India". I moved it back because the wording "Indian classical music" is widespread and also used by scholars. The
44:
1122:
640:
Since 'Carnatic Music ' site states that it is the music that started through-out India during Vedic period, it should be merged with 'Indian Classical Music'
449:
883:
Removing Odissi from the main streams. If anyone want to add, please revise the entire section to reflect your addition, rather than just adding the line.
1132:
79:
1097:
1072:
1067:
497:
What's the deal with these errors? Who has/is changing them? Please discuss your changes here, since its a very controversial topic to write about
1107:
1087:
1077:
856:
415:
1117:
994:
425:
579:
Ideally, however, we would be more than capable of writing articles which examine the same topic from multiple angles with little redundancy.
1092:
204:
85:
743:
691:
1137:
596:
647:
444:
340:
168:
135:
1044:
836:
707:
664:
517:
296:
943:
Are the scales used in Indian classical music usually diatonic as in the West? What non-diatonic scales if any are most common?
1102:
1062:
99:
30:
104:
20:
899:
74:
213:
129:
390:
380:
335:
65:
915:
125:
739:
695:
175:
600:
549:
109:
979:
651:
573:
273:
24:
735:
948:
861:
587:
219:
975:
887:
840:
731:
711:
687:
668:
643:
606:
521:
974:
On the whole, it is best to get rid of this section ("Status in the twenty-first century") entirely.
190:
141:
1021:
161:
55:
1025:
760:
70:
576:
with at most one to ree sentences summarizing differences and proving the link to this article.
895:
869:
819:
793:
51:
944:
778:
545:
1002:
803:
548:. No use lumping all of Indian classical music into one page. If necessary we can have a
727:
understand the Indian classical music first before adding some information. Thank you
929:
569:
541:
537:
1056:
756:
627:
580:
891:
865:
815:
498:
486:
372:
266:
1048:
1029:
1016:
I have a question. Maybe It isn't true, so I want to be sure. I have heard mostly
1006:
983:
952:
933:
903:
873:
844:
823:
808:
764:
747:
715:
699:
672:
655:
630:
610:
590:
525:
505:
489:
250:
232:
774:
284:
1017:
998:
796:
362:
256:
924:
553:
356:
329:
434:
993:
Material removed for lack of citation should not be restored unless a
388:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the
792:
Could be of interest: can stream or download for about four weeks.
536:
We really don't need this; all the information here is already in
385:
568:
I would suggest all of the content regarding classic music from
920:
Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Indian classical music
291:
page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us
184:
15:
433:
918:
has been nominated for deletion, please see discussion at
160:
911:
Portal:Indian classical music nominated for deletion
283:, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardize
305:
Knowledge:WikiProject Music/Music genres task force
287:articles on Knowledge. Please visit the task force
595:This page is very valuable and should be retained
308:Template:WikiProject Music/Music genres task force
384:, which aims to improve Knowledge's coverage of
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1128:B-Class Indian music articles of Top-importance
174:
8:
280:Music genres task force of the Music project
324:
227:
1113:B-Class India articles of High-importance
1083:Knowledge level-4 vital articles in Arts
679:Sindhi classical artists of the pakistan
857:Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians
706:Okay... then create WP pages for them.
326:
229:
188:
7:
1123:Top-importance Indian music articles
516:section be considered resolved now?
378:This article is within the scope of
218:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
958:Status in the twenty-first century
14:
1133:WikiProject Indian music articles
1041:2402:3A80:1E09:81D:0:4D:7FE2:6201
1098:Music genres task force articles
1073:Knowledge vital articles in Arts
1068:Knowledge level-4 vital articles
989:Readdition of unsourced material
365:
355:
328:
259:
249:
231:
198:
189:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
788:ABC radio doco on Zakir Hussain
420:This article has been rated as
1108:High-importance India articles
1088:B-Class vital articles in Arts
1078:B-Class level-4 vital articles
874:20:28, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
1:
1118:B-Class Indian music articles
1030:10:29, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
984:15:53, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
934:04:20, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
922:. Thank you for your time, —
916:Portal:Indian classical music
904:14:26, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
565:Indian music togethepoooooor.
442:This article is supported by
302:Music/Music genres task force
239:Music/Music genres task force
42:Put new text under old text.
1093:B-Class music genre articles
1049:15:35, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
490:05:05, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
748:18:53, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
656:16:37, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
611:02:47, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
400:Knowledge:WikiProject India
277:is within the scope of the
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1154:
1138:WikiProject India articles
1035:Hindustani classical music
765:06:33, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
700:21:42, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
591:17:47, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
445:the Indian music workgroup
426:project's importance scale
403:Template:WikiProject India
1007:20:52, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
995:reliable secondary source
830:List of notable musicians
631:14:44, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
556:22:26, 30 Jul 2004 (UTC)
441:
419:
350:
244:
226:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
845:18:14, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
824:10:43, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
809:10:40, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
583:22:36, 30 Jul 2004 (UTC)
953:04:27, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
716:16:26, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
673:16:24, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
550:History of Indian music
526:15:49, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
506:18:07, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
1103:B-Class India articles
1063:B-Class vital articles
1012:Indian classical music
939:Is it mainly diatonic?
574:Indian classical music
438:
274:Indian classical music
75:avoid personal attacks
25:Indian classical music
862:Sangeet Natak Akademi
814:Thanks for the link!
437:
205:level-4 vital article
100:Neutral point of view
311:music genre articles
105:No original research
636:Merger is Justified
297:good article status
722:Persian influences
439:
295:genre articles to
293:assess and improve
214:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
907:
890:comment added by
751:
734:comment added by
690:comment added by
658:
646:comment added by
464:
463:
460:
459:
456:
455:
381:WikiProject India
323:
322:
319:
318:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1145:
906:
884:
806:
801:
750:
728:
702:
663:separate pages.
641:
614:
546:Hindustani music
408:
407:
404:
401:
398:
375:
370:
369:
368:
359:
352:
351:
346:
343:
332:
325:
313:
312:
309:
306:
303:
269:
264:
263:
262:
253:
246:
245:
235:
228:
211:
202:
201:
194:
193:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1153:
1152:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1053:
1052:
1037:
1014:
991:
960:
941:
913:
885:
881:
852:
832:
804:
797:
790:
729:
724:
685:
681:
638:
623:
604:
534:
469:
422:High-importance
405:
402:
399:
396:
395:
371:
366:
364:
345:High‑importance
344:
338:
310:
307:
304:
301:
300:
265:
260:
258:
212:on Knowledge's
209:
199:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1151:
1149:
1141:
1140:
1135:
1130:
1125:
1120:
1115:
1110:
1105:
1100:
1095:
1090:
1085:
1080:
1075:
1070:
1065:
1055:
1054:
1036:
1033:
1013:
1010:
990:
987:
959:
956:
940:
937:
912:
909:
880:
877:
851:
848:
831:
828:
827:
826:
789:
786:
785:
784:
783:
782:
736:Musicclassical
723:
720:
719:
718:
692:119.154.47.132
680:
677:
676:
675:
637:
634:
622:
619:
618:
617:
616:
615:
609:comment added
584:
577:
570:Music of India
566:
542:Carnatic music
538:Music of India
533:
530:
529:
528:
495:
494:
493:
492:
468:
465:
462:
461:
458:
457:
454:
453:
450:Top-importance
440:
430:
429:
418:
412:
411:
409:
406:India articles
377:
376:
360:
348:
347:
333:
321:
320:
317:
316:
314:
271:
270:
254:
242:
241:
236:
224:
223:
217:
195:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1150:
1139:
1136:
1134:
1131:
1129:
1126:
1124:
1121:
1119:
1116:
1114:
1111:
1109:
1106:
1104:
1101:
1099:
1096:
1094:
1091:
1089:
1086:
1084:
1081:
1079:
1076:
1074:
1071:
1069:
1066:
1064:
1061:
1060:
1058:
1051:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1034:
1032:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1011:
1009:
1008:
1004:
1000:
997:is provided.
996:
988:
986:
985:
981:
977:
972:
968:
964:
957:
955:
954:
950:
946:
938:
936:
935:
931:
927:
926:
921:
917:
910:
908:
905:
901:
897:
893:
889:
878:
876:
875:
871:
867:
863:
859:
858:
849:
847:
846:
842:
838:
829:
825:
821:
817:
813:
812:
811:
810:
807:
802:
800:
795:
787:
780:
776:
771:
770:
769:
768:
767:
766:
762:
758:
752:
749:
745:
741:
737:
733:
721:
717:
713:
709:
705:
704:
703:
701:
697:
693:
689:
678:
674:
670:
666:
661:
660:
659:
657:
653:
649:
645:
635:
633:
632:
629:
620:
612:
608:
602:
598:
597:99.225.175.69
594:
593:
592:
589:
588:70.69.161.130
585:
582:
578:
575:
571:
567:
564:
559:
558:
557:
555:
551:
547:
543:
539:
531:
527:
523:
519:
514:
513:
512:
508:
507:
504:
502:
501:
491:
488:
483:
482:
481:
480:
479:
476:
475:
474:
466:
451:
448:(assessed as
447:
446:
436:
432:
431:
427:
423:
417:
414:
413:
410:
393:
392:
387:
383:
382:
374:
363:
361:
358:
354:
353:
349:
342:
337:
334:
331:
327:
315:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
281:
276:
275:
268:
257:
255:
252:
248:
247:
243:
240:
237:
234:
230:
225:
221:
215:
207:
206:
196:
192:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1038:
1015:
992:
973:
969:
965:
961:
942:
923:
914:
886:— Preceding
882:
879:Odissi music
855:
853:
833:
798:
791:
753:
725:
682:
648:75.55.122.99
639:
626:Kundalini.--
624:
572:be moved to
562:
535:
509:
503:
499:
496:
477:
472:
471:
470:
467:Gross Errors
443:
421:
391:project page
389:
379:
373:India portal
278:
272:
267:Music portal
220:WikiProjects
203:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
945:CountMacula
730:—Preceding
686:—Preceding
642:—Preceding
605:—Preceding
532:Duplication
285:music genre
148:free images
31:not a forum
1057:Categories
976:Ramaratnam
837:24.1.31.69
708:24.1.31.69
665:24.1.31.69
518:24.1.31.69
289:guidelines
1039:Malaylam
1018:Harmonium
621:Kundalini
208:is rated
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1022:Cassa342
900:contribs
888:unsigned
757:Elliotb2
744:contribs
732:unsigned
688:unsigned
644:unsigned
628:Elliotb2
581:Hyacinth
485:noted.--
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
892:Sivaraj
866:Hekerui
816:Hekerui
755:form.--
607:undated
563:all poo
552:page.--
544:and/or
487:Gautam3
424:on the
210:B-class
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
805:(talk)
500:Gautam
216:scale.
126:Google
999:DrKay
775:~rAGU
397:India
386:India
341:Music
336:India
197:This
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1045:talk
1026:talk
1003:talk
980:talk
949:talk
930:talk
925:Cirt
896:talk
870:talk
850:Name
841:talk
820:talk
799:Tony
794:link
779:talk
761:talk
740:talk
712:talk
696:talk
669:talk
652:talk
601:talk
554:Siva
540:and
522:talk
416:High
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
603:)
176:TWL
1059::
1047:)
1028:)
1005:)
982:)
951:)
932:)
902:)
898:•
872:)
864:.
843:)
822:)
763:)
746:)
742:•
714:)
698:)
671:)
654:)
524:)
452:).
339::
156:)
54:;
1043:(
1024:(
1001:(
978:(
947:(
928:(
894:(
868:(
839:(
818:(
781:)
777:(
759:(
738:(
710:(
694:(
667:(
650:(
613:.
599:(
520:(
428:.
394:.
299:.
222::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
