1486:. Beyoncé explains that she did not move her lips silently, but sung accompanied by a recording of her own voice. This is different from lip synching where there is no singing whatsoever: the person mouths the words of the song. If we were to accept your definiton of lip synching (that it's not important whether someone "sang along a bit") then every instance of singing would be lip synching, when this isn't true as its a clearly defined practice . The "big deal" is that the primary picture of this article, which intends to demonstrate an example of lip synching, refers to something which has been shown to not be lip synching at all. Furthermore, the incident is not even mentioned in the article at any other point. Why would we stick a picture of someone not lip synching on top of an article about lip synching? —
414:
396:
1520:. Whether or not the vocal chords also are used to some extent is not relevant to the syncronization of the lips, which is all the term describes. What the audience hears is what's important, and in this case the recorded song was clearly dominant in her performance. Shall we have the inauguation audio analysed? Wherever the song can be heard both with ther recorded voice and her live voice will then be disclosed (I believe that's nowhere), and I can get that published by a reliabe source. --
1465:
need to wait for sound technicians to forensically analyse recordings of the broadcasts of the inauguration to find our how many syllables she sang along with and how many she silently lip-synched? Wouldn't be that hard to do, my studio might even be able to do it, but could be embarrassing. What she actually did should be obvious, even to you. But is it somehow shameful? Does she regret what she did? Why, if so? To me, the whole thing is getting silly. --
81:
589:
368:
1225:
156:
512:
494:
522:
298:
274:
308:
424:
22:
1391:
and not a very good way to perform the song. I'm very sceptical that a technically odd and artistically risky performance like that took place on that occasion. As you can see, Futterman also seems sceptical and surprised that she would claim such a thing. I tend to agree with him. I think she lip synched, and that's what all the reliable sources say she did. --
946:
71:
53:
717:
up causing a cumulative total greater than your particular "threshold of recognition" it will bother you since in nature audio can never be ahead of the event which produced it and our brains can't process that impossibility. Lagging audio is a natural phenomenon as sound travels about 1 ms per foot so it is much less noticeable.
1549:, it means that any time a person moves their lips they are said to be lip synching. You can tell from the first sentence of this article that "lip synching" is not a literal term, but it refers to a specific practice. Also, your assertion that "most dictionaries do not include silently in the definition" is simply not true:
1835:
Here's what I think is going on in this case (based on who my opponent seems to be in the discussion above): Biyonsay lip-synched at the inaugural, which was accurately reported in reliable media. But she doesn't want that revealed on WP. Someone working for her or in her interest is trying to get it
1433:
I think you've mischaracterised
Futterman's question and his follow-up. I don't think he is sceptical of Beyoncé's claim, I think he's confused about the nature of what she's saying, and that's why he presses her into a yes/no answer. Nor do "all of the reliable" sources say that she lip synched; the
720:
Unfortunately, however, once that threshold is passed and the lip-sync error is noticed most viewers can detect and are then bothered by much smaller errors in some cases down to a few ms if they are really focusing on it. Some newer Av Amps also offer a compensating lip-sync audio delay but all that
1725:
As I've explained above, I think lip syncing and singing with a pre-recorded track are sufficiently different practices within the music industry. This article, which concerns the former, is where a singer does not sing, but pretends to sing to give the effect of singing. I looked at some dictionary
1617:
article where what Beyoncé did on this occasion is described. You can look at the bottom of that page where lists are provided of singers who use backing tracks to certain or full extent for further examples; as you can see its a widespread practice that does not "fail technically" or "sound weird".
1464:
What's the big deal? She syncronized her lips to a recording of her voice. I don't see that it's important whether or not she also sang along a bit, a note and a syllable here and there. She lip synched. Let's be reasonable! Why else would they play a recording of her singing, for all to hear? Do we
912:
I'll comment here rather than that article for now. It would be quite helpful to introduce more industry related articles and links so anyone interested in that field can learn more even if we provide a short summary. It would be best to expand the article so the general reader can better understand
631:
How correctly does wiki want to spell its titles? I know the oligopoly of software companies thought it would be cute to write the word "sync" on all of our programs, but as far as I can tell, synch is short for synchronize like psych is short for psychology, that is, we don't split the chi sound in
716:
The best explanation I have seen on any of the forums was from the member above who indicated it might take 60 ms audio leading the video to cause a user to notice it. We call that the "threshold of recognition" and it varies from 15 ms for some users to over 90 ms for others. When video delays add
1766:
singing (albeit, accompanied in this incident). I don't think we should be using a picture of an incident in the lead of an article that does not actually represent what it seeks to describe. The lead of an article is arguably meant to be an article's most accessible part: where we set out exactly
1390:
This source provides only what the singer claims. That claim is not in itself a reliable ( = independent) source to substantiate what actually took place. If she had sung simultaneously with a recording of her voice singing, that would obviously have been noticeable, not to say technically sloppy,
1027:
Generally, for a music video, the whole song is pre-recorded in a studio (unless the video contains live footage from a concert), which ensures a high audio quality and more effective filming of the video - you don't have to do several takes for the music (Film studio time being mre expensive than
769:
Just a note -- I wrote my masters thesis a bunch of years ago about lip syncing and it in cludes many references and sources. Feel free to mine it for documentation. Here is the table of contents -- if you think it is useful, email me through the link on this page and tell me how/where to post the
742:
All the accusations of lip-synching by specific performers should be referenced or removed. What we have now is a lot of rumors and guesses (both good and bad guesses). If you can't find a ref to cite to back up the claim—not that there was actual lip-synching, which is usually controversial, but
673:
As most live acts today employ some method (eg DAT) to prerecord their live concerts the section on miming should be expanded and eventually moved to its own article. Researchers aren't going to get much information from the music industry for obvious reasons. All the more incentive for
Knowledge
1647:
I've worked with live and lip-synching stage performers since 1970, and first saw lip-synching done in an
American TV studio in 1959, so I'm hardly going to learn anything on the subject from you. How about let's have some input from somebody else? You keep repeating yourself as if I didn't know
1501:
She lip synched, and the caption has now been adjusted to reflect the fact that she also voice synched to some extent, making her performance even more interesting in this context. If she didn't lip synch they would obviously not have played the song with her recorded voice, at high very risk of
733:
Your TV (and my HLN617W1) have a video processing time that's longer than most TVs out there. It's specified at 60ms max. That is the threshold where most people will begin to notice the delay. If the source signal also has the video delayed, as it often does, added to your TV's video processing
869:
is all of how many days old? Perhaps that concept could be developed a bit better to encompass the technical aspects that would seem inappropriate here and then summarized in this article. Personally I would give TVtech some time, a month maybe?, to flush that article out a bit and provide some
724:
Ironically, the high end displays like LCD, DLP, and Plasma with their video processing requirements and inherently slower displays are often the "straw that breaks the camels back" pushing the video delay beyond that "threshold of recognition" and the larger image size of Hi Deff have made the
653:
I second the comment above. Despite the magisterial OED's assertion, "lip-sync" is doubtfully "the proper spelling" of this abbreviation. (Tom Wolfe, for one, uses "synch" to abbreviate "synchronize" throughout his well-known New
Journalistic book on Ken Kesey and the 1960s counterculture, The
1055:
This looks very outdated. I can only name the Dragon Age and Mass Effect series right now, where there is no scrolling text at all, instead full lip sync for cutscenes as well as for in-game comments (even one-liners and taunts) by the characters. I think that's the norm nowadays, except for
721:
I have seen put it in set-up where you can't see the video and hear the audio while adjusting it. Most only have a single delay setting which isn't adequate since things like progressive scan conversion add about 35 ms of video delay so you really need different delays for different sources.
1716:
article. The incident is the singer's live performance of the
American national anthem during the second inaugration of President Obama. News organisations reported that the singer lip synced her performance; she later clarified in a press conference that she sung with a pre-recorded track.
1648:
English. What's worse, "pretend" is re: singing not lip movements, and "silent" is not included in the dictionaries descriptions. If your going to twist things like that, away from the facts, nobody is going to be able to have a rational discussion with you. I certainly don't know how. --
885:
The issue of singers lip syncing their music and the technical lip sync problem experienced in television systems are so diverse that merging everything that comments on one or the other seems unproductive. I personally would like to see the two split into entirely distinct subjects.
632:
half. At least merriam-webster has the preferred spelling to be lip-synch, including both h and hypen. Hate to be a spelling nazi, but it's the title...and I've had this beef since I was 12 when n-sync came out. EDIT: OED has lip-sync. We're at least missing a hyphen.
1618:
To address your second point, it is not the job for
Knowledge (XXG) editors to analyse anything but sources. If you or someone you know attempted to analyse this audio, and published it drawing your own inferences, I believe you would be in violation of
1060:"New RPGs, however, usually use some degree of voice overs. These games are typically for computers or modern console systems and include such games as Mass Effect and The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion. In these full voice over games, lip sync is crucial."
1347:
FUTTERMAN: Steve
Futterman from CBS News. Can I clarify one thing that you said. You were sing along with the prerecorded track. At the inauguration were you actually singing, as well, or did any sound come out of your vocal cords during the national
1012:
Probably varies depending on the artiste and situation - actually singing along would probably look more authentic, while miming might be used during dance routines - or if the singer just gets embarrassed in front of the film crew!
734:
time, you begin to notice the sync issue. So, it's not caused by the TV or the source alone, it's a combination of added delay. Samsung is fixing the sets to lower the delay range down into 40ms, for those customer that complain.
1630:
where a musician concurs that there was live singing and he provides points of reference where this can be sought. By definition this means that the performance was not lip synched as that is where you "pretend" to move your
1322:
source also affirms she used a pre-recorded track, but chooses to use the headline "Beyoncé admits lip synching" for what I think is senstaionalism. Other sources that reported that this was a pre-recorded track include
1074:
It should also be noted that modern game engines support auto-generated and localized lip-syncing, which means that lip movements are automatically created by the engine and change according to language spoken.
244:
1786:. There's enough ambiguity over this situation that it should not be highlighted as a prominent example in the lead of this article. It should be trivially easy to find a less ambiguous example.
1758:
The key distinction here is whether someone is singing. I think it's clear from the dictionary definitions (and even other sources) that lip syncing is a clearly-defined practice, one where someone
1185:
There are many overlapping sections that need to be merged. Even here, most of the Lip sync article is about musis. So I don't understand the logic of creating a separate "Lip sync in music" page.
809:"Lip singing" is what people who do not know the correct term think they hear when someone says "lip syncing." I think it is a mistake to validate this error, as the current article appears to do.
870:
external links for those who deal in the issue or wish to learn more. My hunch is this article is attracting more pop culture hits so agree that two articles may make more sense in the long run.
1840:
sources have it that she lip-synched. I may be wrong, and I'll leave it up to other neutral editors to decide whether or not this action to remove what I consider a fact should succeed or not.
2126:
1767:
what something is. I don't think it's best to be using misleading examples, especially when the incident referred to in the image is not mentioned at any point in the article. Best, —
470:
1876:: so what if it is controversial. If it is supported by reliable sources it can be included if the original intention was to give an example of it. Actually, in my opinion lip sync
1335:. Some of the articles have short clips of the subsequent press conference she discuses the National Anthem performance in, but they disappointingly don't use the full conference.
476:
654:
Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test.) It also leads to the present participial form "lip syncing," which looks as if it ought to be pronounced (I render this phonetically) "lip-sinsing."
1803:. I agree that it would be better to find a less ambiguous (and less controversial) example than the Beyonce example. It's not crucial to the subject of the article itself. --
1449:
No, that re-write would be fallacious as the second part ("she says she also used her vocal chords") affirms that the example wouldn't be lip synching, rendering it useless. —
377:
284:
1990:
1986:
1972:
1623:
1688:
This has been open for three weeks and not be commented on for 10 days so interest from neutral seems to have ran its course. The RfC showed there was a consensus to
446:
1097:
The article uses both "lip-syncing" and "lip-synching" spellings. Although both are acceptable it might make sense to unify the spelling within the same article.
1712:
This dispute (which you can read directly above) concerns whether an image of an incident involving
American singer Beyoncé should feature in the lead of the
2121:
1275:
It is, but your original usage was incorrect. Asking "what happens when there's no objection" is different. If there has been no dissent, then merge away.
1479:
The reason why it's important whether "she sang along a bit" is because, by definition, that is not lip synching. I refer you to the definition above, to
437:
401:
2136:
2091:
1434:
ones I've provided report what she said at the press conference. They don't say "well Beyoncé said this, but what we all really think is she did this". —
127:
550:
1328:
1755:: "an audio or MIDI recording that musicians play or sing along to in order to add parts to their music which would be impractical to perform live."
133:
2111:
1372:". I think these concepts are substantially different from another, and using a picture from the inaguaration is misrepresenting what happened. —
928:
I think that the phrase 'lip synch' should be changed to 'lip sync' (or vice-versa) to keep it tidy and try and get the 'cleanup' banner removed.
1052:"Because of the sheer amount of information conveyed through the game, the majority of communication is done through the use of scrolling text."
1950:
713:
Lip-sync error is a widespread problem and not limited to any specific equipment but occurs anytime the video is delayed more than the audio.
1351:
BEYONCE: Typically, they have you sing a prerecorded track because anything could go wrong. So, I did sing along with the prerecorded track.
546:
536:
499:
2106:
929:
639:
2096:
1413:
Beyoncé lip syncs (though she says she also used her vocal chords to some extent) at the second inauguration of
President Obama in 2013.
1014:
103:
2116:
697:
Isn't there a special term for the synching that is done translations of animation? Maybe it's just an anime fan term--I'm not sure.
326:
202:
1332:
1244:
1361:
It's signficant because Beyoncé was singing with assistance, but singing nonetheless. This is different to lip synching, which the
781:
When watching some TV dramas I've noticed that the actors are lip synching to music in the finale, could someone help put that in.
2086:
168:
33:
2131:
2101:
1171:. Here's one more: how do we use Knowledge (XXG) when there has been no objection to a merger proposal for several months? --
208:
94:
58:
1707:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1909:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
851:
into this article. Maybe if the two are combined, the attention that this article gets will improve the former article. --
338:
330:
334:
321:
279:
901:
1580:
1854:
The image is particularly interesting because of this dispute, as it also illustrates the shame that some people feel
1749:
FUTTERMAN (CBS): "So, you actually were singing and the prerecorded track was being played, as well?" BEYONCE: "Yes."
1791:
799:
What is that? there is no article about it and no expalnation of what it is or why someone would confuse the two.
215:
1362:
1989:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
977:
Yeah, I was like WTF!, too. I'll remove it since it has nothing to do with the article... Tell me if I'm wrong.
611:
429:
933:
643:
39:
1018:
2067:
1951:
https://web.archive.org/20110512053055/http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/01/arts/music/01NELS.html?pagewanted=1
1863:
1808:
1653:
1525:
1507:
1470:
1424:
1396:
1294:
1265:
1204:
1176:
1143:
1129:
982:
602:
889:
635:
413:
395:
1289:
Thank you! Started this now and then had to run due to emergency. Hope to be back to clean it up soon. --
1102:
816:
2028:
2008:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1996:
1954:
1825:
1787:
1117:
659:
445:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
229:
102:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
99:
1248:
655:
1605:
All of the dictionaries I've consulted contain the same inference: that lip synching is when someone
1098:
812:
181:
21:
1190:
1002:
174:
2063:
1859:
1804:
1649:
1521:
1503:
1466:
1420:
1392:
1313:
1290:
1280:
1261:
1200:
1172:
1158:
1139:
1125:
978:
914:
893:
871:
834:
800:
682:
617:
191:
1993:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1622:. This action also wouldn't help your neutrality in this dispute. Although I did stumble across
1366:
1324:
2009:
1741:
1727:
1592:
1556:
1167:
I do not understand your objection to my use of the help tag in this context. I think I asked
545:-related issues on Knowledge (XXG). For more information, or to get involved, please visit the
1932:
1747:". At a press conference, Beyoncé was pressed to confirm to a CBS reporter whether she sung: "
442:
225:
86:
1748:
1613:
singing. The practice of acompanying your singing with a pre-recorded tack is covered on the
1354:
FUTTERMAN: So, you actually were singing and the prerecorded track was being played, as well?
1340:
2024:
1892:
1821:
1774:
1669:
1638:
1493:
1456:
1441:
1379:
1231:
897:
856:
613:
588:
2016:
1028:
audio studio time) and both artists and crew concentrate on the filming/acting process. --
997:
Do singers just mouth the words during the video shoots or do they actually sing the song?
2058:
The 'h' is normally added to a word where a vowel follows the 'c' and otherwise not. Thus
1940:
782:
187:
1619:
771:
2047:
1975:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1186:
1083:
1033:
998:
958:
866:
848:
748:
155:
2015:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1982:
1734:
1568:
367:
2080:
1752:
1614:
1276:
1154:
1545:
I think you've misunderstood what lip synching means. If we accept your definition,
758:
701:
690:
527:
1224:
1546:
1480:
913:
that it impacts their daily life if they ever watch television or related media.
325:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can
1886:
1769:
1694:
1664:
1633:
1488:
1451:
1436:
1374:
852:
313:
1843:
Please note that no reliable source quotes any sound technician or anyone else
847:
I know the two are error-ridden, but I hope that there is a consensus to merge
833:
This section should be broken up with subsections for readability and clarity.
511:
493:
1981:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
517:
419:
303:
297:
273:
221:
195:
76:
1153:
Nothing wrong with your merger proposal, but a help tag doesn't belong here.
1547:
whether or not the vocal chords also are used to some extent is not relevant
1079:
1029:
954:
686:
1343:, and I think the question from CNN in that conference is quite important:
2046:
The title is lip sync yet the article most often spells it "lip synching"
1922:
1713:
1121:
1068:
826:
342:
1937:
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add
1743:
pretend to be singing them when in fact they are just moving their lips
1598:
pretend to be singing them when in fact they are just moving their lips
698:
2062:
on its own is not really correct and is liable to me mispronounced. --
1955:
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/01/arts/music/01NELS.html?pagewanted=1
615:
1945:
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
542:
541:, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all
689:
to use lip-sync. The article has ben updated to reflect such. --
2071:
2052:
2036:
1899:
1867:
1829:
1812:
1795:
1777:
1738:
or say in synchronization with recorded sound (Merriam Webster)
1672:
1657:
1641:
1529:
1511:
1496:
1474:
1459:
1444:
1428:
1400:
1382:
1298:
1284:
1269:
1208:
1194:
1180:
1162:
1147:
1133:
1106:
1087:
1037:
1022:
1006:
986:
962:
937:
917:
905:
874:
859:
837:
820:
803:
785:
763:
751:
663:
647:
1336:
1219:
618:
582:
70:
52:
15:
1880:
be controversial at times and Knowledge (XXG) has to reflect
1518:
most dictionaries do not include "silently" in the definition
1960:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
366:
1502:
having her performance fail technically and sound weird. --
1731:
in synchronization with a pre-recorded soundtrack (Oxford)
1258:
The "Help me" template is for help using Knowledge (XXG).
1056:"simplified" systems, which I don't know enough about...
757:
I removed the whole section as none of them has sources.
1921:
I have just added archive links to one external link on
1926:
1236:
797:
People often get this term mixed up with "lip singing."
772:
http://worldcatlibraries.org/oclc/30709834?tab=details
441:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
98:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1985:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1243:, contact the responding user(s) directly on their
1564:in synchronization with a pre-recorded soundtrack"
1234:has been answered. If you need more help, you can
475:This article has not yet received a rating on the
132:This article has not yet received a rating on the
1484:in synchronization with a pre-recorded soundtrack
1370:in synchronization with a pre-recorded soundtrack
1071:text) You don't need lip sync for voice-overs.
341:. To improve this article, please refer to the
2127:Unknown-importance Telecommunications articles
1971:This message was posted before February 2018.
1576:or say in synchronization with recorded sound"
455:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Telecommunications
8:
1847:to substantiate the claim that Biyonsay did
1419:Would that make her look better or worse? --
1235:
747:of lip-synching—then it should be removed.
1588:(prerecorded words) on television or film"
488:
390:
337:. To use this banner, please refer to the
268:
163:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
141:
47:
770:whole darned thing for posterity's sake.
559:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject LGBT studies
1762:to sing and not where someone actually
490:
458:Template:WikiProject Telecommunications
392:
270:
49:
19:
1692:the image from the article. Regards, —
1199:Thank you. That's my point exactly. --
1169:a question about using Knowledge (XXG)
1067:is talking or doing a narration. (non-
1681:RfC: Image in the lip syncing article
7:
1703:The following discussion is closed.
435:This article is within the scope of
319:This article is within the scope of
92:This article is within the scope of
2122:C-Class Telecommunications articles
1620:our guidelines on original research
38:It is of interest to the following
1726:definitions which state it is to "
1596:: "performers who lip-synch songs
1124:. Seems like a duplication to me.
14:
2137:WikiProject LGBT studies articles
2092:Unknown-importance Media articles
1925:. Please take a moment to review
1609:to be singing, not when somebody
1339:, however, provides a transcript
562:Template:WikiProject LGBT studies
375:This article is supported by the
112:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Media
1905:The discussion above is closed.
1751:This is the practice of using a
1223:
1046:Some gripes with the RPG section
944:
587:
520:
510:
492:
422:
412:
394:
351:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Film
335:regional and topical task forces
306:
296:
272:
154:
79:
69:
51:
20:
1858:be associated with lip sync. --
1409:rewrite the caption like this:
533:This article is of interest to
2112:Filmmaking task force articles
1078:Correct me if I'm wrong... --
1007:01:38, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
987:21:36, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
865:I'm mixed on the proposal and
827:Lip sync#Lip-synching in music
752:02:35, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
438:WikiProject Telecommunications
209:Content (media and publishing)
1:
2053:19:13, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
1107:11:40, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
1023:04:06, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
918:02:38, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
906:02:12, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
875:02:36, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
860:01:46, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
838:17:38, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
685:is far from the only type of
449:and see a list of open tasks.
145:WikiProject Media To-do List:
106:and see a list of open tasks.
1900:00:20, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
1868:10:39, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
1830:04:26, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
1813:07:12, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
1796:00:21, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
1778:20:21, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
1673:20:21, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
1658:17:59, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
1642:15:04, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
1530:05:21, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
1512:05:09, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
1497:23:33, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
1475:21:39, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
1460:21:20, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
1445:21:20, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
1429:21:09, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
1401:21:03, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
1383:20:51, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
1181:20:34, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
1163:20:26, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
1148:20:21, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
938:21:20, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
764:07:29, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
2107:C-Class filmmaking articles
2037:16:11, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
1662:I've started a RfC below. —
1247:, or consider visiting the
963:16:03, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
821:13:31, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
804:18:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
777:Actors Lip syncing to songs
461:Telecommunications articles
2153:
2097:WikiProject Media articles
2072:18:47, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
2002:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1943:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
1918:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1820:For reasons stated above -
1063:Voice over means a person
664:04:31, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
477:project's importance scale
134:project's importance scale
115:Template:WikiProject Media
2117:WikiProject Film articles
1557:Oxford English Dictionary
1363:Oxford English Dictionary
1209:23:45, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
1195:23:31, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
1134:06:10, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
1088:15:21, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
1038:15:24, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
743:just whether there was a
505:
474:
407:
374:
354:Template:WikiProject Film
291:
140:
131:
64:
46:
1907:Please do not modify it.
1705:Please do not modify it.
693:20:42, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
537:WikiProject LGBT studies
430:Telecommunication portal
1914:External links modified
1836:removed, though, to me
1299:13:16, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
1285:14:12, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
1270:12:51, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
973:Drag queens? WHAT?!?!
786:22:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
704:21:12, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
648:07:40, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
2087:C-Class Media articles
1729:move the lips silently
1562:move the lips silently
1482:move the lips silently
1368:move the lips silently
1050:(Role-playing games:)
993:Music video lip syncs?
881:Merge proposal comment
795:In the lede it states
791:What is "Lip singing"?
674:(XXG) to pursue this.
371:
28:This article is rated
2132:C-Class LGBT articles
2102:C-Class film articles
1118:Lip-synching in music
549:or contribute to the
378:Filmmaking task force
370:
245:requests for comments
230:Alternative newspaper
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1983:regular verification
1968:to let others know.
1929:. If necessary, add
1238:ask another question
709:Audio video Lip Sync
1973:After February 2018
1964:parameter below to
327:join the discussion
1978:InternetArchiveBot
1736:to pretend to sing
1706:
1574:to pretend to sing
683:Computer animation
452:Telecommunications
443:Telecommunications
402:Telecommunications
372:
192:Video game culture
34:content assessment
2035:
2003:
1704:
1255:
1254:
1240:on your talk page
908:
892:comment added by
762:
638:comment added by
624:
623:
581:
580:
577:
576:
573:
572:
487:
486:
483:
482:
389:
388:
385:
384:
329:and see lists of
267:
266:
263:
262:
259:
258:
255:
254:
226:Alternative media
95:WikiProject Media
87:Journalism portal
2144:
2031:
2030:Talk to my owner
2026:
2001:
2000:
1979:
1944:
1936:
1898:
1788:NinjaRobotPirate
1548:
1485:
1365:defines as to: "
1318:: Well actually
1317:
1242:
1227:
1220:
952:
948:
947:
887:
829:section too long
761:
650:
619:
591:
583:
567:
566:
563:
560:
557:
530:
525:
524:
523:
514:
507:
506:
496:
489:
463:
462:
459:
456:
453:
432:
427:
426:
425:
416:
409:
408:
398:
391:
359:
358:
355:
352:
349:
322:WikiProject Film
316:
311:
310:
309:
300:
293:
292:
287:
276:
269:
169:Article requests
158:
151:
150:
142:
120:
119:
116:
113:
110:
89:
84:
83:
82:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
2152:
2151:
2147:
2146:
2145:
2143:
2142:
2141:
2077:
2076:
2044:
2034:
2029:
1994:
1987:have permission
1977:
1938:
1930:
1916:
1911:
1910:
1885:
1709:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1683:
1569:Merriam Webster
1311:
1309:
1120:be merged into
1116:I propose that
1114:
1112:Merger proposal
1095:
1048:
995:
971:
945:
943:
926:
883:
845:
831:
793:
779:
740:
725:problem worse.
711:
680:
671:
669:Miming Extended
633:
629:
620:
614:
596:
564:
561:
558:
555:
554:
526:
521:
519:
460:
457:
454:
451:
450:
428:
423:
421:
356:
353:
350:
347:
346:
312:
307:
305:
282:
251:
188:Media influence
117:
114:
111:
108:
107:
85:
80:
78:
29:
12:
11:
5:
2150:
2148:
2140:
2139:
2134:
2129:
2124:
2119:
2114:
2109:
2104:
2099:
2094:
2089:
2079:
2078:
2075:
2074:
2043:
2040:
2027:
2021:
2020:
2013:
1958:
1957:
1949:Added archive
1915:
1912:
1904:
1903:
1902:
1833:
1832:
1815:
1798:
1723:
1722:
1710:
1701:
1687:
1686:
1685:
1684:
1682:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1589:
1577:
1565:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1532:
1514:
1447:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1403:
1359:
1358:
1355:
1352:
1349:
1308:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1253:
1252:
1245:user talk page
1228:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1113:
1110:
1094:
1091:
1062:
1054:
1047:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1040:
994:
991:
990:
989:
970:
967:
966:
965:
930:81.158.160.138
925:
922:
921:
920:
882:
879:
878:
877:
867:Lip sync error
849:lip sync error
844:
843:Merge proposal
841:
830:
824:
808:
792:
789:
778:
775:
767:
766:
739:
736:
731:
730:
710:
707:
706:
705:
679:
676:
670:
667:
640:66.133.237.171
628:
625:
622:
621:
616:
612:
610:
607:
606:
598:
597:
592:
586:
579:
578:
575:
574:
571:
570:
568:
532:
531:
515:
503:
502:
497:
485:
484:
481:
480:
473:
467:
466:
464:
447:the discussion
434:
433:
417:
405:
404:
399:
387:
386:
383:
382:
373:
363:
362:
360:
318:
317:
301:
289:
288:
277:
265:
264:
261:
260:
257:
256:
253:
252:
250:
249:
248:
247:
240:
232:
211:
198:
177:
162:
160:
159:
147:
146:
138:
137:
130:
124:
123:
121:
118:Media articles
104:the discussion
91:
90:
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2149:
2138:
2135:
2133:
2130:
2128:
2125:
2123:
2120:
2118:
2115:
2113:
2110:
2108:
2105:
2103:
2100:
2098:
2095:
2093:
2090:
2088:
2085:
2084:
2082:
2073:
2069:
2065:
2064:SergeWoodzing
2061:
2057:
2056:
2055:
2054:
2051:
2050:
2041:
2039:
2038:
2032:
2025:
2018:
2014:
2011:
2007:
2006:
2005:
1998:
1992:
1988:
1984:
1980:
1974:
1969:
1967:
1963:
1956:
1952:
1948:
1947:
1946:
1942:
1934:
1928:
1924:
1919:
1913:
1908:
1901:
1896:
1895:
1890:
1889:
1883:
1879:
1875:
1872:
1871:
1870:
1869:
1865:
1861:
1860:SergeWoodzing
1857:
1852:
1850:
1846:
1841:
1839:
1831:
1827:
1823:
1819:
1816:
1814:
1810:
1806:
1805:FuriousFreddy
1802:
1799:
1797:
1793:
1789:
1785:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1776:
1772:
1771:
1765:
1761:
1756:
1754:
1753:backing track
1750:
1746:
1744:
1739:
1737:
1732:
1730:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1715:
1708:
1697:
1696:
1691:
1680:
1674:
1671:
1667:
1666:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1655:
1651:
1650:SergeWoodzing
1646:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1640:
1636:
1635:
1629:
1627:
1621:
1616:
1615:backing track
1612:
1608:
1599:
1595:
1594:
1590:
1587:
1583:
1582:
1578:
1575:
1571:
1570:
1566:
1563:
1559:
1558:
1554:
1553:
1552:
1551:
1550:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1522:SergeWoodzing
1519:
1515:
1513:
1509:
1505:
1504:SergeWoodzing
1500:
1499:
1498:
1495:
1491:
1490:
1483:
1478:
1477:
1476:
1472:
1468:
1467:SergeWoodzing
1463:
1462:
1461:
1458:
1454:
1453:
1448:
1446:
1443:
1439:
1438:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1426:
1422:
1421:SergeWoodzing
1418:
1414:
1411:
1410:
1408:
1404:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1393:SergeWoodzing
1389:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1381:
1377:
1376:
1371:
1369:
1364:
1357:BEYONCE: Yes.
1356:
1353:
1350:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1326:
1321:
1320:The Telegraph
1315:
1314:SergeWoodzing
1306:
1300:
1296:
1292:
1291:SergeWoodzing
1288:
1287:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1262:SergeWoodzing
1259:
1250:
1246:
1241:
1239:
1233:
1229:
1226:
1222:
1221:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1201:SergeWoodzing
1198:
1197:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1173:SergeWoodzing
1170:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1140:SergeWoodzing
1136:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1126:SergeWoodzing
1123:
1119:
1111:
1109:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1092:
1090:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1076:
1072:
1070:
1066:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1045:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1015:92.234.48.114
1011:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1004:
1000:
992:
988:
984:
980:
979:Someone963852
976:
975:
974:
968:
964:
960:
956:
951:
942:
941:
940:
939:
935:
931:
923:
919:
916:
911:
910:
909:
907:
903:
899:
895:
891:
880:
876:
873:
868:
864:
863:
862:
861:
858:
854:
850:
842:
840:
839:
836:
828:
825:
823:
822:
818:
814:
810:
806:
805:
802:
798:
790:
788:
787:
784:
776:
774:
773:
765:
760:
756:
755:
754:
753:
750:
746:
737:
735:
728:
727:
726:
722:
718:
714:
708:
703:
700:
696:
695:
694:
692:
688:
684:
677:
675:
668:
666:
665:
661:
657:
651:
649:
645:
641:
637:
626:
609:
608:
605:
604:
600:
599:
595:
590:
585:
584:
569:
565:LGBT articles
552:
548:
544:
540:
539:
538:
529:
518:
516:
513:
509:
508:
504:
501:
498:
495:
491:
478:
472:
469:
468:
465:
448:
444:
440:
439:
431:
420:
418:
415:
411:
410:
406:
403:
400:
397:
393:
380:
379:
369:
365:
364:
361:
357:film articles
344:
340:
339:documentation
336:
332:
328:
324:
323:
315:
304:
302:
299:
295:
294:
290:
286:
281:
278:
275:
271:
246:
242:
241:
239:
237:
233:
231:
227:
223:
220:
218:
217:
212:
210:
207:
205:
204:
199:
197:
193:
189:
186:
184:
183:
178:
176:
173:
171:
170:
165:
164:
161:
157:
153:
152:
149:
148:
144:
143:
139:
135:
129:
126:
125:
122:
105:
101:
97:
96:
88:
77:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
2059:
2048:
2045:
2022:
1997:source check
1976:
1970:
1965:
1961:
1959:
1920:
1917:
1906:
1893:
1887:
1881:
1877:
1873:
1855:
1853:
1848:
1844:
1842:
1837:
1834:
1817:
1800:
1783:
1768:
1763:
1759:
1757:
1742:
1735:
1728:
1724:
1711:
1702:
1693:
1689:
1663:
1632:
1625:
1610:
1606:
1604:
1597:
1591:
1585:
1579:
1573:
1567:
1561:
1555:
1544:
1517:
1487:
1481:
1450:
1435:
1412:
1406:
1373:
1367:
1360:
1319:
1310:
1257:
1256:
1237:
1232:help request
1168:
1138:Shall we? --
1137:
1115:
1096:
1077:
1073:
1064:
1059:
1058:
1051:
1049:
996:
972:
949:
927:
884:
846:
832:
811:
807:
796:
794:
780:
768:
744:
741:
732:
723:
719:
715:
712:
681:
672:
652:
634:— Preceding
630:
601:
593:
556:LGBT studies
547:project page
535:
534:
528:LGBTQ portal
500:LGBT studies
436:
376:
320:
235:
234:
214:
213:
201:
200:
180:
179:
175:Mackay Radio
167:
166:
93:
40:WikiProjects
1884:as well. --
1822:Xcuref1endx
1745:(Cambridge)
1307:Re: Beyoncé
888:—Preceding
656:Mucketymuck
314:Film portal
2081:Categories
1851:lip sync!
1721:Discussion
1065:off-screen
813:Verdun Kid
783:Luckystars
738:References
551:discussion
343:guidelines
331:open tasks
285:Filmmaking
222:Multimedia
196:Sound bite
2060:lip synch
2017:this tool
2010:this tool
1593:Cambridge
1187:werldwayd
1099:Longdehua
999:TyVulpine
749:Everyking
687:animation
678:animation
627:Lip-Synch
2042:Spelling
2023:Cheers.—
1933:cbignore
1923:Lip sync
1888:lTopGunl
1845:reliable
1838:reliable
1760:pretends
1714:lip sync
1607:pretends
1586:to mouth
1277:Primefac
1249:Teahouse
1155:Primefac
1122:Lip sync
1093:Spelling
1069:diegetic
969:See Also
915:Benjiboi
902:contribs
890:unsigned
872:Benjiboi
835:Benjiboi
801:Benjiboi
691:b. Touch
636:unsigned
594:Archives
2033::Online
1962:checked
1927:my edit
1874:Include
1818:Exclude
1801:Exclude
1784:Exclude
1690:exclude
1628:article
1581:Collins
1348:anthem?
1333:Reuters
924:Cleanup
243:Answer
182:Cleanup
30:C-class
2049:Enigma
1941:nobots
1856:should
1770:JennKR
1740:" or "
1695:JennKR
1665:JennKR
1634:JennKR
1631:lips.—
1489:JennKR
1452:JennKR
1437:JennKR
1405:PS We
1375:JennKR
894:TVtech
853:Kannie
216:Verify
36:scale.
1626:Slate
1624:this
1516:Btw,
1407:could
1230:This
745:claim
543:LGBTQ
236:Other
109:Media
100:Media
59:Media
2068:talk
1966:true
1894:talk
1882:that
1864:talk
1826:talk
1809:talk
1792:talk
1733:"; "
1654:talk
1526:talk
1508:talk
1471:talk
1425:talk
1397:talk
1341:here
1331:and
1295:talk
1281:talk
1266:talk
1205:talk
1191:talk
1177:talk
1159:talk
1144:talk
1130:talk
1103:talk
1084:talk
1080:megA
1034:talk
1030:megA
1019:talk
1003:talk
983:talk
959:talk
955:Kvng
950:Done
934:talk
898:talk
857:talk
817:talk
660:talk
644:talk
348:Film
333:and
280:Film
203:NPOV
1991:RfC
1953:to
1878:can
1849:not
1584:: "
1572:: "
1560:: "
1337:CNN
1329:ABC
1325:CNN
729:* *
471:???
128:???
2083::
2070:)
2004:.
1999:}}
1995:{{
1939:{{
1935:}}
1931:{{
1866:)
1828:)
1811:)
1794:)
1773:|
1764:is
1668:|
1656:)
1637:|
1611:is
1528:)
1510:)
1492:|
1473:)
1455:|
1440:|
1427:)
1399:)
1378:|
1327:,
1297:)
1283:)
1268:)
1260:--
1207:)
1193:)
1179:)
1161:)
1146:)
1132:)
1105:)
1086:)
1036:)
1021:)
1005:)
985:)
961:)
936:)
904:)
900:•
855:|
819:)
759:BJ
702:¿?
699:gK
662:)
646:)
283::
228:,
224:,
194:,
190:,
2066:(
2019:.
2012:.
1897:)
1891:(
1862:(
1824:(
1807:(
1790:(
1775:☎
1670:☎
1652:(
1639:☎
1524:(
1506:(
1494:☎
1469:(
1457:☎
1442:☎
1423:(
1395:(
1380:☎
1316::
1312:@
1293:(
1279:(
1264:(
1251:.
1203:(
1189:(
1175:(
1157:(
1142:(
1128:(
1101:(
1082:(
1032:(
1017:(
1001:(
981:(
957:(
953:~
932:(
896:(
815:(
658:(
642:(
603:1
553:.
479:.
381:.
345:.
238::
219::
206::
185::
172::
136:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
