403:
the article can be developed much more, and in doing so, the difference between the two methods can (and should) eventually be highlighted. The lateral window technique is the one that can raise the floor ~10mm, while Zimmer is saying how their balloon technique, as an internal technique, can obtain a greater height than conventional osteotome tapping. Be that as it may, it requires a separate apparatus that isn't necessarily worth it. And in regard to the stats, numbers become meaningless because everyone does their procedure differently. Tapping an osteotome to native bone to infracture it will cause lots more perforations than restricting oneself to only tapping bone, and there aren't enough studies out there with enough power to really give us a good idea of what causes what how often. But one day, when the article is improved (and perhaps now that you point it out, I will put it on my radar screen), I will take all of this into consideration when broadening the scope of the currently limited focus. Thanks so much!
85:
64:
33:
176:
155:
186:
346:(2) I think we also need to differentiate for our readers between the (two?) methods used during this surgery to raise the Schneiderian membrane, and to tell them that the risk of perforations to that membrane when the "traditional method" is used is very high, occurring in up to 56% of such surgeries, according to one paper; see following.
349:
The 10mm claim appears be contradicted by what I imagine is a fairly authoritative source, although probably not a citable one. I refer to the website for Zimmer Dental, a firm that makes implants and implant surgery devices, including a balloon device for use in what one of the refs currently in our
402:
The Zimmer Dental website greatly underestimates the conventionally attained increase in sub-sinus bone, but that's because it's comparing itself to osteotome, not lateral window. !There are two types of sinus lifts -- an internal (osteotome) method and an external (lateral window) technique. Sure,
360:
of sinus height lift". The context of that page makes it clear that the phrase "the traditional procedure" ( which I know nothing about ) is to be understood as being contrasted to the hydraulic balloon technique for raising the
Schneiderian membrane. The Zimmer site goes on to mention that when 1cc
343:(1) Our article currently says that after this procedure, "the floor of the sinus will now be roughly 10mm or so more superior than it was before". I suspect the claim of this much bone augmentation might be significantly too high; see following.
368:
The same Zimmer Dental web page says that the "traditional" ( non-balloon ) method of elevating the
Schneiderian membrane "commonly results in perforations to the up to 56 percent of the time". That's cited on their website to
320:
Hilt Tatum, inovator of this procedure and recent editor, has been hesitant to assist in establishing independant, third-part sourcing and, as such, I have not been able to procure early data for this procedure.
340:
Hi all. I know very little about this procedure, but as I was investigating it on the web two concerns arose that I'd like to submit to the collective judgment of folks who keep an eye on this page:
204:
377:
on the topic, which puts the perforation rate at between 11% and 56%. I'm not qualified to evaluate papers or stats on this topic, however, and would be grateful if an editor who
208:
270:
Im trying to find any info on assisting for the Sinus Lift
Procedure. I am a Perio Assistant and I have my first Sinus Lift coming soon and I would love feedback on this.
137:
277:
Well, there's nothing really to tell you other than follow what the doctor asks you to do. Specific questions can be forwarded to my talk page, if you desire.
248:
306:
tag off the page, but if you have any edits, please refrain from submitting until the article is in some form of appropriate fashion for
Knowledge (XXG).
505:
127:
520:
238:
525:
510:
500:
381:
would go ahead edit the article to address both this concern, and the one about the 10mm augmentation claim that I raised above. Many thanks,  –
515:
213:
96:
69:
199:
160:
44:
463:
300:
17:
50:
32:
391:
102:
271:
361:
of saline is used to inflate the firm's hydraulic balloon product that the expected sinus elevation is
353:
432:
470:
440:
426:
422:
I am not free to work on this article currently. My advice to anyone who wants to take it on:
383:
478:
448:
405:
323:
308:
279:
191:
494:
296:
I will be editing this article heavily in the next week or so -- I have left a
374:
370:
181:
84:
63:
418:
Completed merge, but this page is still in need of a lot of attention
175:
154:
486:
456:
411:
396:
329:
314:
285:
211:. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at
26:
203:, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the
429:-- guide to selecting suitable sources for medical articles
94:. If you want to participate and/or join, please visit the
350:
article calls the "Hydraulic Sinus
Condensing Technique".
18:Talk:Maxillary sinus floor augmentation procedure
207:and that biomedical information in any article
205:Manual of Style for medicine-related articles
8:
356:says "the traditional procedure results in
30:
149:
58:
214:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Medicine
469:Very niche topic, a type of sinus lift.
151:
60:
112:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Dentistry
7:
223:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Medicine
197:This article is within the scope of
435:-- style guide for medical articles
49:It is of interest to the following
25:
506:Low-importance dentistry articles
373:. In looking around I also found
521:Low-importance medicine articles
209:use high-quality medical sources
184:
174:
153:
83:
62:
31:
243:This article has been rated as
132:This article has been rated as
526:All WikiProject Medicine pages
511:WikiProject Dentistry articles
501:Start-Class dentistry articles
115:Template:WikiProject Dentistry
1:
516:Start-Class medicine articles
487:23:54, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
315:01:23, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
286:19:07, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
226:Template:WikiProject Medicine
90:This article is supported by
457:15:50, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
412:03:02, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
397:01:06, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
542:
464:Hydraulic sinus condensing
249:project's importance scale
138:project's importance scale
100:, or ask questions on the
330:13:39, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
242:
169:
131:
78:
57:
354:The Zimmer Dental page
39:This article is rated
365:plus or minus 0.5mm.
92:WikiProject Dentistry
43:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
462:Proposed merge with
200:WikiProject Medicine
439:Good luck. Thanks,
118:dentistry articles
45:content assessment
301:underconstruction
263:
262:
259:
258:
255:
254:
229:medicine articles
148:
147:
144:
143:
103:project talk page
16:(Redirected from
533:
483:
475:
453:
445:
408:
395:
388:
326:
311:
305:
299:
282:
231:
230:
227:
224:
221:
194:
189:
188:
187:
178:
171:
170:
165:
157:
150:
120:
119:
116:
113:
110:
87:
80:
79:
74:
66:
59:
42:
36:
35:
27:
21:
541:
540:
536:
535:
534:
532:
531:
530:
491:
490:
479:
471:
467:
449:
441:
420:
406:
384:
382:
338:
324:
309:
303:
297:
294:
280:
268:
228:
225:
222:
219:
218:
192:Medicine portal
190:
185:
183:
163:
117:
114:
111:
108:
107:
72:
40:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
539:
537:
529:
528:
523:
518:
513:
508:
503:
493:
492:
466:
460:
437:
436:
430:
419:
416:
415:
414:
337:
334:
333:
332:
293:
292:Article revamp
290:
289:
288:
267:
264:
261:
260:
257:
256:
253:
252:
245:Low-importance
241:
235:
234:
232:
196:
195:
179:
167:
166:
164:Low‑importance
158:
146:
145:
142:
141:
134:Low-importance
130:
124:
123:
121:
88:
76:
75:
73:Low‑importance
67:
55:
54:
48:
37:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
538:
527:
524:
522:
519:
517:
514:
512:
509:
507:
504:
502:
499:
498:
496:
489:
488:
484:
482:
476:
474:
465:
461:
459:
458:
454:
452:
446:
444:
434:
431:
428:
425:
424:
423:
417:
413:
410:
409:
401:
400:
399:
398:
393:
389:
387:
380:
376:
375:another paper
372:
366:
364:
359:
355:
351:
347:
344:
341:
335:
331:
328:
327:
319:
318:
317:
316:
313:
312:
302:
291:
287:
284:
283:
276:
275:
274:
273:
272:68.37.189.216
265:
250:
246:
240:
237:
236:
233:
216:
215:
210:
206:
202:
201:
193:
182:
180:
177:
173:
172:
168:
162:
159:
156:
152:
139:
135:
129:
126:
125:
122:
105:
104:
99:
98:
93:
89:
86:
82:
81:
77:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
34:
29:
28:
19:
480:
472:
468:
450:
442:
438:
421:
404:
386:OhioStandard
385:
378:
367:
362:
357:
352:
348:
345:
342:
339:
336:Two concerns
322:
307:
295:
278:
269:
244:
212:
198:
133:
101:
97:project page
95:
91:
51:WikiProjects
41:Start-class
495:Categories
407:DRosenbach
371:this paper
325:DRosenbach
310:DRosenbach
281:DRosenbach
433:WP:MEDMOS
109:Dentistry
70:Dentistry
427:WP:MEDRS
266:Question
220:Medicine
161:Medicine
247:on the
136:on the
473:Lesion
443:Lesion
47:scale.
358:2-3mm
481:talk
451:talk
392:talk
363:6mm
239:Low
128:Low
497::
485:)
455:)
379:is
304:}}
298:{{
477:(
447:(
394:)
390:(
251:.
217:.
140:.
106:.
53::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
