Knowledge

Talk:Murder of Ahmaud Arbery/Archive 2

Source 📝

425:
human life where the same person makes multiple conflicting (or seemingly conflicting) statements and sometimes Knowledge records them. Take statements of politicians, for example. If a politician says "I don't support this war" and the next day they say "I do support this war", should both statements be removed from Knowledge because we don't know which one is "correct"? Clearly that's not what happens and the eventual solution is usually to include both statements (assuming that they are notable, etc.) but with some note that they conflict or including people's reactions to that inconsistency. The answer is that things are included based on notability, from reliable sources, and given due weight. If the things which meet those criteria to be included in the encyclopedia are still conflicting or confusing, special care is needed to avoid confusion but the proper recourse is not to just remove the entire topic. Here's an example: "On Monday, the politician said X but on Tuesday the politician said Y . He has not clarified the relationship between these two statements." Doesn't seem that upside down to me. I feel that your fourth sentence distorts the issue greatly by ignoring why things are included in Knowledge in the first place, which this topic meets (in my opinion). Finally, "Are you going to sit around here and interpret someone's words?" Your implication that English's statements could never be de-conflicted or explained is also an "interpretation of his words". Everyone interprets the sources, we just have to do it with good judgment. Including both statements and noting the inconsistency is, in fact, the least "interpretive" way of presenting the relevant material.
384:
their potential inconsistencies. It seems that the issue here is the specification of dates (if they are known) rather than a contradiction. The two sources may be reconcilable and what, if anything, was stolen from the property is notable and has received consistent attention from RS. Perhaps when English said he "never had...anything stolen" he is colloquially saying that he didn't have anything stolen on the date of the shooting incident specifically? Or perhaps the theft of the fishing tackle did happen but was so long ago that English doesn't associate the two incidents? Has any date been provided for the theft of the fishing tackle? Just some ideas about why it would be premature to remove either quote.
3222:
do. It's not our job to solve the case. Nearly every news headline is referring to him as jogging and unless new information comes out contradicting that, I say we leave it alone. Who are we to push our own narrative on Knowledge? And don't bring up that useless surveillance footage that practically shows nothing. Not even a "burglary" is shown and the homeowner has come out and said that nothing was taken. We can update later if new information is released. Also, what is the point of bringing up Ahmaud Arbery's past criminal offenses? Just doing that raises suspicions about your intentions here.
98:, a lead image "should be of least shock value", and the example given is opting for images of Holocaust victims being deported rather than images of them being abused or their dead bodies. Currently, the lead image is one of Arbery falling to the ground after being shot, and I personally feel this is too shocking for the lead image. I realize this is an article about a shooting and the image won't be pleasant, however, a screencap of the confrontation when Arbery is still alive accomplishes the same thing (visualizing the interaction) and does not subject readers to the image of a falling body. 1112:"A quick acting police officer in Brunswick stopped a teenager with a loaded gun from entering a high school basketball game Tuesday night. Police arrested 19-year-old Ahmaud Marquez Avery (pictured below), who is not a student at Brunswick. "The man ran through the parking lot. I tried to get him to stop as well. He would not stop for us," said Glynn County Schools Chief of Police, Rod Ellis. "We ended up chasing him to the back of the school were other officers helped us apprehend him."" Sounds relevant to me. 31: 2230:"Reliable Sources". The police reports say he was running. The Two 911 witnesses said he was running. The CCTV video SHOWS he was running (CCTV doesn't lie but Fake News does). The only people who are claiming he was "jogging" was his family who weren't even there. If the "reliable sources" claimed tomorrow the sky was Green is Knowledge policy to accept their reality unopposed? Well I do challenge it. The "jogging" part is fake news 2520:
or attempting to burglarize a house. But Leftist media wants to produce as many units of outrage as possible to further their grand ethos of racism in America. I don't care either way - I'm a political centrist. But if Knowledge wants to be a biased source furthering the agenda of CNN then they can be but if you want Neutrality better to just report facts. I say we use the term "reportedly jogging" as this's an undisputed fact.
2836: 442:, I see you are an admin with a long history on Knowledge. I apologize for my previous comment, which may have come across as pedantic to you because I am sure you are very well-versed in Knowledge policy and have much more experience than many on this page. Nonetheless I stand by the conclusions of my argument and I hope we can have a constructive conversation. 2635:"summary execution" ... oh yea, now I'm seeing all the Neutral editors in this article. Dude it's clear in the video the kid grabbed his gun. That's what you define as summary execution? This Talk page is making me lose respect for the credibility of Knowledge - and it's something I rely on for factual information... a practice I may have to rethink. 2581:
evidence of any wrongdoing here more significant than brief trespassing - the punishment for which in no modern liberal democracy is summary execution by shotgun in a city street. That he had prior convictions for minor crimes is not relevant, because it cannot even lessen, much less excuse, killing an unarmed person who is not threatening anyone.
1533: 2310:. It could have been that he told his family "Hey I'm going for a jog" then wanted to go see if there was anything in the building. I mean he's not going to tell his family "hey I'm looking for stuff to steal" if that's what he was doing - he would have made some excuse to go out. It could have been that he was simply jogging. 410:, we're living in the upside down. Also upside down: an edit summary for an edit I just reverted: "remove WP:SYNTHESIS. Sources which pre-date the events of this article and do not mention this event cannot, by definition, be used as background to it." In other words, events from the past cannot be background. Wut? 3221:
What are you even talking about anymore? It's clear from your "leftists pushing rednecks hunting blackfolk story" comment above that you have a personal agenda here. We're not detectives and we're not the police. We know just as much as news media outlets like ABC, CNN, Fox News, Washington Post etc.
1372:
He recently gave 1 or 2 interviews. In my opinion there are still questions left open though. One that is important is whether he had a firearm in his car on that day. From what I could gathered, his answer was not absolutely clear on this either way (the lawyer intercepted the question). This should
477:
the events of this article and do not mention these events. This means that it is Knowledge editors - not the sources - which are claiming this is background. To make a silly comparison - if I found an article from 3 years ago that said the streets in this area were being re-paved, that would not be
3385:
Again let me make this clear. I am completely on the side of Arbery. But I've come to that conclusion after reading all the available facts about the case. I, and other people, need a place where we can read all the facts about a situation and come to our own conclusions. Not be spoon-feed a certain
2565:
And there is exactly zero evidence that he was just out for a peaceful jog. Going into someone's 'under construction' home is not consistent with going for a jog. Also Arbery had been previously arrested for theft and carrying a gun into a High School as an adult. All I'm saying is that as a Neutral
2519:
That's not the point. Of course no one deserves to die even if he was burglarizing the place. But here's the point: "suspected burglary suspect shot" produces say 5 units of outrage. "Innocent unarmed jogger shot" produces 10 units of outrage. The reality is that we don't know if he was just jogging
2305:
There are multiple narratives here. Knowledge should not subscribe to either. We should simply state the facts. The Right Wing narrative which is "He was entering the house and those guys were just trying to protect their community" and the Left Wing narrative "innocent black man jogging gets gunned
2049:
Nope. He is clearly jogging. There is no neutrality in this case. Until you can find evidence that he is intentionally running from the scene of a crime, we go by what the video footage shows. As of now, nothing supports your argument. Even the sources you provided above contradict the agenda you're
1451:
should be the word used here. "Running" implies he wasn't exercising and has a negative connotation especially when describing people of color in a case like this. "Running" also sounds too definitive when there is a clear difference between running and jogging. We should go by the family's claim as
1250:
Reliable sources don't tend to treat the priors as relevant; they occurred several years ago for fairly minor crimes not involving violence. Last year 4,000+ people illegally carried a gun into an airport security checkpoint; that also wouldn't likely be relevant to one of those people being shot in
765:
article and better summarized here in 2-3 sentences in a single paragraph. I'd also like to see the section heading returned to just "Background" as is pretty standard for our articles. That also allows other things like Arbery's prior involvement with the police (and McMichael's as investigator) to
424:
In regards to what you reverted, to my knowledge, no one in this topic is involved in it and it doesn't seem to be directly related to this topic, so this probably isn't the place to discuss it. In regards to your other point, I really don't see any reason for mystification. There are many places in
383:
Even if multiple statements from English conflict, the ones that are notable and from reliable sources should be included in the article. Right now both statements meet that criteria and the best we can do is to include all those statements and any commentary that other reliable sources have made on
215:
The owner of a home under construction near the scene of Arbery's February 23 shooting, listed as a victim in the police report, said his surveillance system captured a man who appeared to be Arbery "coming onto his property" on that day. The homeowner, who declined to share the clips with CNN, said
3381:
come out a the case progresses and it will look even worse when it's found people tried to hide it. So it's really a matter of if Knowledge wants to be part of this whitewashing or not. But if Knowledge tries to hide information and spin things I will absolutely do an investigative journalism piece
3368:
information so I can make up my own mind on things. It's the only reason I'm outraged over this article. I don't want to be spoon-fed an agenda. This is outrage-inducing because I, and many other people, rely on Knowledge to get unbiased information. I come to encyclopedias for factual information,
3345:
They deleted the section his priors but left and entire section related to his 'hopes and dreams of going to college and becoming an electrician.' :::::::You don't think in a case like this people would want to know about priors? But talking about 'hopes and dreams' pulls at your heartstrings which
3314:
To be clear - I'm personally on the side of Arbery. These rednecks had no business playing police - ESPECIALLY With guns. But It's not our job to presume guilt or innocence and both jogging and running are clear attempts to paint innocence or guilt. It's our job to present a factual account of what
3126:
reliable sources to fit your argument. The only reason we have to believe the jogging narrative is from his mothers testimony, who has an obvious horse in this game. Many many many reliable sources say "running." I'm acting as an arbitrator between the people saying "running" and "jogging" and as I
2504:
Whether he was jogging, running, had entered a premises, or was indeed fleeing the scene of a crime is not left or right wing - how people seek to mitigate the actions of McMichaels however is very much politically motivated. In contrast, being "left wing" for thinking someone probably shouldn't be
1975:
Yes, I think it is. Jogging is a leisurely form of running, so if we say he was jogging, we are saying he was not trying to escape from people who were chasing him. That is not something we are in a position to conclude for ourselves. And most of the sources that I have seen have said only that his
1421:
The word jogging should be kept in the article where it is presented as a claim: because his family said he was out jogging. However, the word jogging should not be used in an encyclopedia entry elsewhere: because it is possible he was not on a jog, but was running from his presence at a house site
1043:
If the reliable sources cover this, if the first DA to take the case mentioned his criminal record as relevant to his mental state, then it should be discussed here. Its whitewashing otherwise. District attorney George E. Barnhill stated: “Arbery’s mental health records and prior convictions help
126:, I've gone ahead and switched the image to one that shows a screen capture of when the struggle was still taking place as opposed to just after the kill shot. If other editors disagree with this (or support this), please join in with your comments here so that the issue can be aired out. Thanks, 2653:
A shot was fired at the victim before the struggle began. By the way, if you attack me with a shotgun, I have every right to defend myself and attempt to take the gun away from you and stop you from killing me with it in the middle of a city street. Arbery, an unarmed person attempting to get away
2599:
I'm more than a tad skeptical that a "political centrist" would be spouting talking points like "the agenda of CNN," "leftist media," and "grand ethos of racism in America." Nobody had any probable cause to believe a burglary occurred, and even if they did, summary execution is not a legitimate or
2284:
He was jogging and just so happened to go into a building during his jog? Last time I went jogging I didn't enter any buildings. We need to be a reliable outlet so if new facts come out during the case people don't say "Knowledge is unreliable." State the facts. Fact: "family said he was jogging."
2195:
At no point was he "jogging" He was running and walking. He walked in front of and then into the house and then ran down the street after exiting the house after being spotted by a neighbour from across the road calling 911. How do we know this? Because real news networks are showing the CCTV from
1351:
I archived some threads that looked spent to try and reduce the size, but most of the rest have comments in the last 24-48 hours. Hard to shrink the window down much more than 2 days, as it doesn't give a lot of time to editors who might not return till the next day to mark replies and comments.
991:
If reliable sources cover it in a biography then that may not be UNDUE, however this isn't a biography, it's about a single event. We aren't going to point out that the victim had a conviction for a minor offence X years ago, because it's not relevant. And I think we know the direction from which
203:
English, 50, said he was about 90 miles away in Douglas, Ga., where he lives with his wife and two children, when Arbery was killed. He said he is severely ill and is building the waterfront home as part of his bucket list. But he said it’s now unlikely his family will ever move into the Brunswick
3272:
You don't see the issue with using the words "reportedly jogging"? To quote the definition: "according to what some say (used to express the speaker's belief that the information given is not necessarily true)". Do you see an issue with us stating that we, the speaker, do not believe the reliable
2670:
I would suggest if the editor doesn't agree with the idea that we go by the weight of reliable sources and significant view points, that he go to one of the noticeboards and raise his concerns there. At the moment he is just pontificating about what sources he considers reliable ignoring the fact
2482:
I'm sorry but wikipedia is not for left wing or right wing narrative pushing. Knowledge for me personally, is an Oasis in an internet of biased gobbildy-gook. The left wing narrative says "jogging" the right wing narrative says "running" – I say we stay out of that game and just report the facts.
3349:
Reliable sources is fine, but people cherrypick which 'reliable sources' to side with. Places like the New York Times or Vox with overt political agendas. The same Media Outlets (New York Times, Vox) that posted 90,000 "Donald Trump is a Nazi" 'news' stories. And again - to be clear I personally
2694:
At a time when more information is available. When any evidence is established to suggest otherwise, we can review the statements, but at present the suggestion that he was "claimed" to be jogging or otherwise is a blatant attempt to use weasel words and insinuation. We don't have to believe the
2408:
No, the time lapse video is sped up on his exit to give the effect of him running away. And for me, going for a "run" is as neutral as going for a "jog", however running away from people chasing you is very different to jogging away, just as running from the scene of a crime has a very different
2337:
in the video you can see he was walking before he entered the house he did not own, and afterwards you can see him running quite fast. It is not clear yet that he was out for jog--do jogs usually entail walking to a house, trespassing and going into the house, being noticed, and then running out
1547:
article, "Jogging is a form of trotting or running at a slow or leisurely pace. The main intention is to increase physical fitness with less stress on the body than from faster running but more than walking, ..." Jogging can be referred to as running, but running implies an interpretation of the
2709:
You're actually right. If it were up to me, I would have stricter rules regarding dubious sources like Fox or CNN or the New York Post and would stick with credible apolitical sources like AP / Reuters / ABC / Al Jazeera / NPR. But you're absolutely right. He was clearly 'jogging' away from the
1044:
explain his apparent aggressive nature and his possible thought pattern to attack an armed man.” He is referring to the time he was caught at a high school football game with a gun, and they had to struggle with him, two police officers injured in the process, one treated for a fractured hand.
3141:
Per below, "reportedly" is a loaded statement. "Running" is neutral depending on the context it is used. Jogging is what the significant majority of reliable sources use to describe his activity, yes, even the ones you don't like. Just because some people think we should use running instead of
568:
aspects of the PD are relevant is being chosen solely by the whims of Knowledge editors - and I'll note that the particular factoids included are only those putting the PD in a negative light. The only way to be sure that any particular factoid about the PD is relevant background is for recent
2580:
Neutrality expressly does not mean we take a "view from nowhere" position. On Knowledge, NPOV means adhering to what mainstream reliable sources say about a topic. In addition, it means we treat living and recently dead people with fairness, especially toward claims of wrongdoing. There is no
2353:
My jogs certainly don't. I don't know what exercise "caught on camera going into a construction building" is. I wonder how many calories it burns. But if you're trying to push a narrative of racism "innocent black man HUNTED just for being black.. see how racist the USA is!" then "he was just
2279:
Here's the problem – we genuinely don't know if he was jogging or fleeing the scene. More things will come out as time goes on. Right now "His family said he was jogging" is a more factual claim than "he was jogging." There's surveillance video of him entering the building under construction.
1235:
immediately deleted it. I think I'm going to bring this to the attention to some real investigative journalists. Arbery's priors were deleted (despite being extremely relevant to the controversy) but the fact that He was a linebacker on the school's football team and had dreams of becoming an
543:, it's not SYNTH. It's about the PD, and the history of the PD is relevant, per the NYT: "Georgia Killing Puts Spotlight on a Police Force’s Troubled History". This is a short summary of the PD's history and of course it's going to discuss matters other than the primary topic of the article. 1639:
To those pretending there isn't a negative connotation to "running" in this context, do you agree there is a different framing in saying those accused of shooting were "driving" or "pursuing" or "chasing"? They were objectively driving, but to use that word gives a different narrative. The
3121:
But you can clearly see in the multiple videos that he was running. From what? We don't know. He could have just been running because people were after him. But it's clear that he's running. But that's 'original research.' Okay, then Reliable sources also say 'running,' but you cherrypick
1880:
You just proved my point for me that overwhelming amounts of credible news media outlets are referring to him as jogging and not running. And no because there is no video evidence of him running from the scene of a crime. Not my interpretation. He is clearly jogging in the video.
3029:
keeps inappropriately closing conversations she/he doesn't agree with. We were discussing the Running vs jogging controversy and she/he puts up absurd tags saying it's discussing the purpose of wikipedia when 90% of the conversation was in regards to the run/jog controversy.
3338:
Only guidelines and heuristics meant to help editors write good articles. If those guidelines lead you to write a clearly incorrect statement then ignore it. This is one of those cases. Following those guidelines leads you to write something that appears to be patently
2614:
CNN is no longer a legitimate news outlet, nor is Fox. They're both propaganda machines of their respective parties. Reuter's is objective. AP is Objective. ABC is objective. CNN and Fox are not, and if you believe CNN or Fox are objective - you're part of the problem.
1236:
electrician is somehow relevant. Make no mistake - this is a complete and utter whitewashing. Knowledge is a serious encyclopedia and we're citing sources like "Vox." Some of these power users are so biased that they don't even realize it their lack of Neutrality. –
2156:
He didn't even live in the area. He'd have had to cross a huge bridge without a sidewalk to get into the area. So if we was doing a "Sunday jog," as his family claimed, then he'd have had to drive about 10 miles from where he lived, across a bridge and then started
1103:
If the McMichaels had a criminal record would you expect it to be reported? Or doesn't BLP apply there? Here is the news story about Ahmaud bringing a handgun to school in 2013 from News4Jax... so from a reliable source. One of the quotes from the police in the
2002:
Who are you to say he was trying to escape from people who were chasing him? And why do we have to disprove that when that's not even what's shown in the video? You don't have proof that he was fleeing from a crime scene. We do have proof that he was jogging.
3127:
compromise I suggest adding one freaking word, "reportedly" and you can't even make a compromise with all the other editors. You just want things your way or the highway because apparently Knowledge is a dictatorship and not a crowd-sourced encyclopedia.
2998:"According to a police report obtained by the New York Times, Gregory McMichael, a former police officer and district attorney’s investigator, told investigators the incident began when he spotted Arbery from his front yard “hauling ass” down the street." 2134:
say he was trying to escape from people who were chasing him (although, if it were me that was being chased by people with guns, I will admit that I might personally try to run away). Please try to pay closer attention to exactly what is being said.
3418:
On the afternoon of February 23, 2020, Ahmaud Arbery, an unarmed 25-year-old African-American man, was confronted by two armed men in a pickup truck, Travis McMichael and his father Gregory McMichael, in Satilla Shores, a community near Brunswick,
839:
A number of editors here are sailing very close to BLP violations with what they are writing. Please be very careful not to do that. If there are any further examples I will not hesitate to remove those editors from this talk page. Thank you,
1230:
Neutrality issues, and I think it's a systemic problem. Knowledge is becoming the inverse mirror image of Conservapedia. – appears to be a major part of the problem - in this article at least. I put up a "Neutrality disputed" tag and
1568:
I think the term jogging is perfectly appropriate here. It is not the fault of the wikipedia users if the accused or people in favour of them wishing to use specific other terms. I consider it a colloquial term for mid-load exercise.
790:, I think we should be careful not to let Netoholic leave with the impression that his claim of SYNTH was "resolved" when in fact it was incorrect. This level of drama can happen again if people don't learn where they went wrong. 949:
laundry lists of people trying to attempt to paint Arbery in a bad light for previous issues that are irrelevant to his shooting; some have been removed today. Basically, if you're going down that route, it's best not to post.
606:
It can be both. The SYNTH is the concern that a conclusion about the state of the PD is being drawn by pulling in multiple negative stories about the PD on a page which is supposed to be about an event, not the PD itself. --
2756:
You have absolutely no idea if he broke any law. I've never heard of any state making it illegal to walk through a construction site that wasn't posted. You need to stop these speculations as they are serious BLP violations.
368:
The difference is that one is referring to a theft of Fishing gear from an unknown date. The other statement is from English relating to the date Arbery was identified. There is no conflict, they are two different incidents.
2354:
jogging" is great wording. But Knowledge is supposed to be the gold standard of objectivity not narrative pushing. We do not have sufficient evidence to say "he was jogging" we do have sufficient evidence to say "his family
482:
source about this event also mentioned the re-paving as a factor -- in which case we would use that newer source and not the older one. This section needs to remove this extraneous information, otherwise it is misleading,
154:
I agree also. The original uploader reverted AzureCitizen but I reverted them and asked them to see the discussion here. Note that when you do this it shows the wrong image in the thumbnail unless you reload the page.
2289:
It may be true. We just don't know yet. For right now, we need to be journalists and start undisputed facts. "He was reportedly jogging" is an undisputed fact. "He was jogging" is something that will come out in time.
2437:
And furthermore.... I actually checked it out... it does appear that he's running. YouTube allows you so slow down the footage in the bottom right corner and if you slow it down to .25 it puts the video in real time.
1661:
Alright, he was jogging during quarantine on private property away from the place of burglary and from the pursuit. Let's make sure the wording is definitely positive, disregarding everything the defense has to say.
2772: 2500:
The right wing narrative is that he was running in a neighbourhood that wasn't his own and he deserved to be shot for not acquiescing to the demands of fine upstanding pillars of the community exercising their
3306:
But regardless some of the reliable sources say jogging. Some say running. Liberal ones tend to say jogging, conservative ones say running. Both are appeals to emotion in order to paint a narrative. As they
959:
If enough reliable sources cover it, I don't think it would be UNDUE. But well, I believe that will be left to an RFC to decide. As will "jogging" versus "running", if people don't accept my simple removal.
2285:
Disputed fact: "he was jogging." CNN is hardly a reliable source anymore. It's basically the leftist version of Fox News. The "innocent man jogging" is a left-leaning narrative that has yet to be proven.
813:, no doubt you can provide sources that make the explicit claim that McMichael targeted Arbery due to his prior history wioth Arbery as investigator? Otherwise it would be - what's the word? Oh yes.... 1138: 1570: 1374: 622:, what fact or claim is included in the text that is not included in the sources? Be specific. And by specific, I mean do not engage in novel synthesis of a claim that does not exist in the text. 569:
sources about the Arbery event to specifically mention them as background. The only source in that section that does so is the NYT May 8. What I suggest instead is you move the irrelevant ones to
1640:
preponderance of sources state he was jogging. Until there is clear evidence, reported in the media, that he was "fleeing" or "running away from", the reported narrative is that he was jogging.
2969:
I removed the tag. You should have reasonable argument for that tag. All you have been saying here is absurd original research. You have provided no reliable source to support what you saying.--
2714:(don't want to use 'weasel words') 'unauthorized entering' scene. I'm screenshooting all this because I guarantee when all the facts come out of this case Knowledge is going to look ridiculous. 3002:
From Reuters, the single most credible news source in the United States. Reuters and Associated Press is where these outlets like CNN BUY their stories from before they put their spin on them.
2678:
parties (The Rednecks and Arbery) parts that got completely out of hand and led to a tragedy. But you're probably right. It was probably just some hillbillies out huntin' jogging black folk.
2497:
No, the left wing narrative says he was killed by summary execution following being pursued by vigilantes who believe that he was guilty of a crime that they felt the need to take action for.
2551:
There is exactly zero evidence that he was burglarizing anything. I've walked into numerous construction sites when younger because of simple curiosity. That's not a "left-wing narrative".
1452:
most news articles are doing. Having "Running" in the sentence is immediately taking a stance against the family. Besides that, an overwhelming amount of news media outlets refer to him as
512:
synthesis. If there is anything in that section which is not mentioned in the NYT article or similar contemporary reports, I would agree that those particular incidents should be removed.
223:
Given the obvious contradictions, and the fact that no publications are reporting on the conflicting statements, it seems unwise to include either assertion. Any objection to removing it?
761:. Please restore it. I'd also suggest that now the length of that section is too long and goes into UNDUE detail about the PD, and that most of that material can be easily moved to the 3058:
You're literally using a quote from his mom's (who wasn't present) statements to police to depict what Arbery was doing. You think we can just take what his mom says as gospel truth?
1204:
Honestly this inaccuracy demonstrates the overt political bias of wikipedia power editors. Fix it or examples like this will continue to be used to undermine wikipedia's reputation.
3044:
You're literally using a quote from one of the killers' statements to police to depict what Arbery was doing. You think we can just take what Gregory McMichael says as gospel truth?
216:
there were previous videos on other occasions showing a man entering the property and stealing fishing tackle but he could not identify the man and he did not file a police report.
2505:
dead right now is a stretch, but shows you how far people are willing to place common decency and humanity waaaaaaay down their list of priorities when the news doesn't suit them.
1509: 398:
IP, no. NO. This is all just hot air for now, never more than in "the two sources may be reconcilable". Are you going to sit around here and interpret someone's words? And are you
3117:
And I'm not even suggesting we refer to it as 'running' as 'running' has too much of a connotation of guilt. But so does 'jogging' which has a too much connotation of innocence.
2773:
https://www.firstcoastnews.com/article/news/crime/new-video-appears-to-show-ahmaud-arbery-enter-home-under-construction-before-being-killed/77-c35447bd-75d6-43c8-afc0-bce0247bdddf
588:, that has no bearing on synthesis. You may view it as giving undue weight to specific facts, but there is no synthesis here, the sources are reliable and accurately represented. 1790:. "Running" gives into the notion that he was fleeing from a scene of a crime. In fact, no burglaries had even been reported during that time according to the police lieutenant. 678:"If there is anything in that section which is not mentioned in the NYT article or similar contemporary reports, I would agree that those particular incidents should be removed" 3193:
see him running from the construction building, especially at the end. He was most likely running from the guys in the truck, but he was absolutely positively 1000% running.
2671:
that it is almost unanimous that Arbery is reported as jogging. Nobody has presented an alternative other than in their fever dreams of righteously smiting black criminals.
2992: 744:
I've replaced the text cited to articles that don't mention Arbery with text cited to articles that explicitly make the connection. Does that resolve the dispute? Thanks,
720:
SYNTH is an objective matter and in this case DOES NOT exist. UNDUE is subjective. And in this case, I think also does not exist, but that would be an ecumenical matter.
3005: 1574: 1422:
that he does not own. Jogging is a narrative provided by the family, and that should stay in the article, but as a claim and not in the objective framing of the event.
1378: 250: 2021:
own personal interpretation. Arbery's family says jogging, the McMichaels say running away. It's words against words. Keep it as both until the investigation is over.
355: 3207:"No original research" ... if the Washington Post told you that the Erie Canal was made of hershey's cocoa would you cite it? The sources are obviously wrong here. 1226:
Seriously.... I'm ready to bring this to the attention to some real investigative journalists. Neutrality is one of the five pillars to Knowledge. This article has
1139:
https://www.news4jax.com/news/2013/12/09/police-man-brought-gun-to-high-school-basketball-game/?fbclid=IwAR0jrboKAxtKCuySC5sntzdleh6AAsTNOrx6FvMHwk0QPN1xzy-MTGUgH0g
1048:
Now how about we discuss this information and if it should be added to the article, without any edit warring of erasing the information. I believe it is relevant.
3142:
jogging does not mean that we should change what is stated by the significant weight of reliable sources. That is not a dictatorship, it's a very basic principle.
1583:
Whether it was for 'exercise' or not is at the heart of the matter. Knowledge should not attempt to explain why he was running, and jogging is a form of running. —
3175:
Knowledge has no rules. Knowledge has guidelines and suggestions to make articles better. In this case stating that he was 'jogging' simply makes the article
1313:"Arbery s mental health records & prior convictions help explain his apparent aggressive nature and his possible thought pattern to attack an armed man." 3015: 2180:
Our article claims 2 miles with a source. If you have a source for some other distance please provide it, so we can see if we need to change the article.
212:
One was a theft of $ 2,500 worth of fishing equipment from English’s property, which he said he didn’t report to police but confirmed to The Daily Beast.
1477: 2566:
outlet we should present both sides of a controversial story rather than jumping on narrative bandwagons and trying to emotionally pull heartstrings.
1505: 2455:
Yea actually - he's almost definitely running. You can see it most clearly in this video at 1:03 where you see him run out of the door on the right.
1501: 1373:
be added to the article when it is found out either way, at a later time. (Right now this is a bit pointless to speculate, without a court trial.)
2160: 1465: 2845:
A third opinion was requested for this dispute. It has been declined due to more than two editors being involved. You might want to try either a
1895:
My point isn't about the amount of sources using "jogging", it's the fact that other reliable sources (especially NYT/WaPo) have used "running".
1469: 1179: 1017: 1489: 81: 76: 71: 59: 1211: 3186:
Articles may or may not say "jogging" but it's clear he's not jogging. The three videotapes support the hypothesis that he was "hauling ass"
2771:
I don't think he broke any laws, but we do know he was inside the building. These aren't speculations. there's literally video of it, lol.
2728:
I strongly suggest you retract your statement above about the alleged events - no source has stated that there was any "break-in" anywhere.
680:. A specific example is the shooting of Caroline Small which is NOT mentioned in the NYT article as background to this article's topic. -- 3428: 2231: 2197: 1663: 1543:– jogging implies a POV interpretation of what he was doing – i.e., that he was out getting some exercise and was not in a hurry. Per the 1437: 1113: 967: 928: 911: 883: 864: 443: 426: 385: 2993:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-shooting-georgia/georgia-grand-jury-to-consider-charges-in-shooting-of-unarmed-black-man-idUSKBN22I02R
2166: 1961: 1647: 1481: 3006:
https://www.savannahnow.com/news/20200506/shooting-death-of-ahmaud-arbery-in-brunswick-what-we-know-about-video-grand-jury-and-arrests
293: 3318:"He was Jogging" is not a fact. "His mother said he was jogging" is a fact. In this case, that 'weasel word' is entirely appropriate. 251:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/05/09/georgia-attorney-general-investigate-local-officials-handling-ahmaud-arberys-murder/
1493: 208:
As far as I'm aware, that Washington Post article is the only source to state that. But numerous other articles conflict with that:
1814: 1045: 2654:
from two armed men, was threatened with a gun, and you think he was wrong to attempt to fight back after being shot or shot at?
2314:
There is CCTV footage of him going into the building. To factually claim he was jogging is disingenuous. The fact is his family
778:
I've added the link. Before getting into the weight issue, can you please confirm whether you view the SYNTH issue as resolved?
200:“That’s completely wrong. I’ve never had a police report or anything stolen from my property, or any kind of robbery,” he said. 123: 3297:
of actual evidence that he was jogging. Only the mother's testimony. And the evidence actually points in the opposite direction
3265: 2091: 2030: 1904: 1859: 1763: 1719: 2795: 1710:– It's currently both with a note. That's what we know so far. When more details come out, we will fix the lede accordingly. 762: 758: 570: 278: 140:
I agree. The details of what happened during the struggle itself are also unclear as much occurs outside the video's frame.--
2286: 1416:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
3463:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
3092: 3049: 2733: 2659: 2651:
It appears from the video that a gunshot is heard before Arbery and Travis struggle with each other in front of the truck.
2605: 2586: 1260: 517: 197:
Larry English, the man who owns the house under construction, told The Washington Post that the structure was not robbed.
2534:
Watch this security footage and tell me that "he was just out for a jog and some fresh air" is an appropriate narrative"
1841:"By now you may have seen the horrific — but sadly, these days, no-longer-shocking — video of 25-year-old Ahmaud Arbery 47: 17: 3016:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/may/07/ahmaud-arbery-killing-man-called-911-report-black-male-running-shooting
3449: 3287:"according to what some say (used to express the speaker's belief that the information given is not necessarily true)" 2244:
Running is not the opposite of jogging. It's a synonym. Most reliable sources say that he was jogging. The defendants
1743: 1461: 318: 3293:. The word 'reportedly' adds skepticism to the claim. And in this case - the skepticism is justified. There is not a 1513: 319:"A suspect in the killing of Ahmaud Arbery was involved in a previous investigation of him, recused prosecutor says" 3369:
and when I want opinions I go to editorializing site. The "Jogging" narrative is editorializing. That narrative is
3159: 193:
Currently in the "Surveillance video" section there is a quote from a Washington Post article. The source states:
38: 3444:
Good solution. I think that works fine. And, also, solves the problem of "running" versus "jogging". Thanks.
3082:
Ahmaud Arbery was shot dead by two white men while jogging through a neighborhood just outside Brunswick, Georgia.
2097: 2036: 1910: 1865: 1769: 1725: 1676:
You are aware this video took place in February? Besides, a street for everyday traffic is not private property.
1485: 1215: 504:
It's only prohibited original synthesis if the connection is made by Knowledge editors and not reliable sources.
3342:
This is an encyclopedia. But this Ahmaud Arbery article has a clear bias that comes from cherry-picking sources.
1836: 3434: 3088: 3045: 2729: 2655: 2601: 2582: 2343: 2235: 2201: 1433: 1256: 1117: 973: 932: 917: 887: 870: 673: 513: 1667: 447: 430: 389: 1829:: "Public pressure for an arrest intensified on Tuesday with the release of the video that showed Mr. Arbery 1750:
in a neighborhood outside Brunswick on February 23 when a former police officer and his son chased him down,
1651: 3250:
he was running. I put in an edit to say "reportedly" jogging and you reversed it? 01:04, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
2840: 2762: 2556: 2456: 2381: 2170: 1965: 1292: 1085: 1824: 3445: 3169: 2674:
No there is another alternative. The other alternative is this it was simply a string of bad decisions on
2391: 2373: 1400: 1357: 706:
What you're actually saying is that in your opinion inclusion of the historical problem with the force is
228: 131: 2339: 1429: 3227: 2976: 2907: 2805: 2267: 2140: 2115: 2055: 2008: 1985: 1945: 1886: 1795: 1681: 1630: 1616: 1602: 1588: 1557: 1548:
intention and pace of the activity that may be unwarranted here. Of course it is OK to say that someone
1522: 3112: 2281: 3253: 2900:
jogging. Also, I have not closed any discussion here. An admin closed the above discussion, not me.--
2875:
I put a dispute in and a neutrality tag. Please do not remove the tag until the dispute is resolved.
2064:
Calm down with your personal attacks, I'm not pushing any agenda. Currently, the article says he was
1957: 1643: 1425: 1207: 1095: 993: 951: 841: 573:. Readers who want more information not directly-related to the Arbery event can go there for it. -- 1287:
Was he convicted? Is it connected to his being killed? Is there a reason you are posting this here?
3423: 3391: 3261: 3212: 3132: 3063: 3035: 2954: 2880: 2779: 2747: 2719: 2683: 2640: 2626: 2571: 2542: 2525: 2488: 2463: 2446: 2428: 2399: 2363: 2323: 2295: 2185: 2087: 2026: 1900: 1855: 1759: 1715: 1318: 1278: 1241: 1157: 962: 906: 859: 770: 684: 611: 577: 530: 495: 2196:
across the street. And yes I have a cite from a real news networks, watch the truth for yourself.
1301:
Yes. He was placed on a five year probation as a first offender. The DA report saw a connection:
1269:
Back in 2013, Arbery was charged with two felonies- possession of a weapon on school property and
3278: 3147: 2758: 2700: 2552: 2510: 2414: 2377: 1395:
Resolved by using neither the word "jogging" nor the word "running" in the lead of the article.--
1341: 1288: 1081: 703:. No claim or fact is adduced in the article which is not supported, 100%, buy reputable sources. 660: 488: 374: 258: 3453: 3439: 3395: 3282: 3231: 3216: 3151: 3136: 3096: 3067: 3053: 3039: 2980: 2958: 2911: 2884: 2870: 2809: 2783: 2766: 2751: 2737: 2723: 2704: 2687: 2663: 2644: 2630: 2609: 2590: 2575: 2560: 2546: 2529: 2514: 2492: 2467: 2450: 2432: 2418: 2403: 2385: 2367: 2347: 2327: 2299: 2271: 2239: 2223: 2205: 2189: 2174: 2144: 2119: 2105: 2059: 2044: 2012: 1989: 1969: 1949: 1918: 1890: 1873: 1799: 1777: 1733: 1685: 1671: 1655: 1634: 1620: 1606: 1592: 1578: 1561: 1526: 1473: 1441: 1404: 1382: 1361: 1345: 1322: 1296: 1282: 1264: 1245: 1219: 1161: 1121: 1098: 1089: 1071: 996: 978: 954: 936: 922: 891: 875: 844: 826: 803: 782: 773: 748: 733: 687: 664: 635: 614: 601: 580: 556: 533: 521: 498: 451: 434: 419: 393: 378: 232: 178: 149: 135: 108: 1046:
https://www.news4jax.com/news/2013/12/09/police-man-brought-gun-to-high-school-basketball-game/
3373:
a neutral point of view. He's being chased. The rednecks were following him for a while. It's
2017:
Where's the proof he was jogging...? If you're going to say the video, that would be based of
1396: 1353: 336: 224: 145: 127: 3223: 3084: 3026: 2970: 2901: 2799: 2261: 2136: 2111: 2051: 2004: 1981: 1939: 1882: 1791: 1677: 1626: 1612: 1598: 1584: 1553: 1518: 1232: 1049: 415: 156: 2835: 1185: 1023: 946: 857:- in the interests of fair warning and transparency, shouldn't you point to the examples? 852: 787: 779: 754: 745: 707: 470: 462: 407: 348: 271: 100: 2619: 1850:
Using the word jogging pushes the family's point of view. Let's be neutral and use both.
526:
The NYT source is fine. The others (WTOC, AJCx2) are not. They do not mention Arbery. --
219:
Police have yet to clarify whether Arbery is accused of any crime at the unfinished home.
3321:
So since this jogging/running a issue of contention and reliable sources disagree I say
2423:
I never said anything about him running from the scene. I said he entered the building.
2287:
https://www.allsides.com/news/2020-05-07-1947/two-men-charged-murder-death-ahmaud-arbery
3387: 3257: 3208: 3128: 3059: 3031: 3021:
Ahmaud Arbery killing: man called 911 to report 'black male running' prior to shooting
2950: 2893: 2876: 2862: 2775: 2743: 2715: 2679: 2636: 2622: 2567: 2538: 2535: 2521: 2484: 2459: 2442: 2439: 2424: 2395: 2359: 2319: 2318:
he was jogging. We state undisputed facts. Not disputed ones as if they're undisputed.
2291: 2219: 2181: 2083: 2022: 1954:
Is it inherently biased to describe what he was doing as jogging rather than running?
1896: 1851: 1755: 1711: 1336:
Can we change the archive period to 1 or 2 days? This talk page is close to 200 kB. --
1314: 1274: 1237: 1153: 810: 767: 692: 681: 648: 619: 608: 585: 574: 540: 527: 492: 473:
after my removal of the material was reverted. MAny sources and claims in this section
3350:
despise Trump, and I've never voted for a Republican candidate in my life, but that's
1497: 3331: 3274: 3143: 2846: 2696: 2506: 2410: 1811:
intepretation. Since you mentioned sources above, there's multiple that use running:
1337: 992:
most of the (mostly new) accounts who are pushing to add this stuff are coming from.
901: 897: 821: 798: 728: 669: 656: 630: 596: 551: 370: 95: 3273:
sources? There is editorialising and then there is being utterly misrepresentative.
3156:
If you want to follow a norm that makes the article less accurate then be may guest.
3413: 2850: 2257: 1148:
Wouldn't "charged with two felonies, possession of a weapon on school property and
696: 402:
saying that as long as we don't know what something means or whether it is correct
141: 2110:
You literally said Ahmaud Arbery jogging was just my interpretation of the video.
3334:. If WaPo said that the moon is made of cheese would you out that in an article? 2616: 484: 439: 411: 117: 46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
3474: 3325: 3196: 2334: 2855: 2215: 3300:
We don't know what happened yet. It's controversial. It's more likely that
1786:
Having both is misleading. And no, there is video footage of him literally
508:
article makes the connection - that's a reliable source, and thus it's not
3386:
POV, even if you can find "Reliable Sources" that conform to that POV. –
2937:
I feel like I just rewound to grade school. I feel like I should respond
2695:
reports. We just cover the reliable sources and summarise what they say.
2457:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igThcykZsZk&feature=youtu.be&t=63
1178:
A formal RfC has begun on this topic. Editors should visit the section "
1016:
A formal RfC has begun on this topic. Editors should visit the section "
815: 792: 722: 624: 590: 561: 545: 294:"'It's Murder': This Shooting of an Unarmed Black Man Is Roiling Georgia" 2483:"Said to have been jogging" is more indisputable than "he was jogging." 3382:
on it. I like Knowledge and I would much rather it stick to Neutrality.
1787: 1544: 882:
Can someone explain what the "L" stands for in BLP. I must be confused.
1807:"there is video footage of him literally running in a steady pace" is 1625:"Running" is not neutral. It implies something negative in this case. 2256:
jogging" we will not take what you are saying seriously. We don't do
3330:
But then the answer to that is "No original research".... and I say
3113:
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/08/sports/Ahmaud-Arbery-running.html
651:, this does not appear to be SYNTH. Please remove the tag. You said 3416:, which I have attempted to solve by removing the word altogether: 2742:
Okay perhaps not a break in, but he was certainly in the building.
2282:
https://www.ajc.com/news/surveillance-video/itEEj5ftMXkbkKeXrCFBTK/
3302:
he was running away from the three assholes who were chasing him.
3162:- If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Knowledge, 2989:
original research. It's our fault you don't pay attention to news:
1817:: "More than two months after a black man was shot to death while 3011:" “the suspect from the break-ins ‘hauling ass’ down the street.” 1938:
that's what all reliable sources that I am aware of are saying.--
204:
home because he’s faced death threats and his wife is too afraid.
1805:
You can not make claims based on your own personal assumptions.
1597:
Simply using "running" is too vague. Jogging is more specific.
2252:
jogging. Unless you have got reliable sources saying that "he
25: 1611:"Jogging is more specific" – yes, but in a non-neutral way. — 3179:
accurate. Stating that he was "reportedly jogging" makes it
655:
with you. Who? I don't see anyone agreeing with you here. –
3119:
We don't know if he was jogging or running from the scene.
2934:
You: "yea but.. none of the sources said it was not blue!"
3085:
Reliable sources say he was jogging, therefore so will we
652: 3105:
off his mother's testimony. There are plenty of other
2620:
https://www.allsides.com/media-bias/media-bias-ratings
1080:
You are very close if not over the line of a BLP vio.
3311:
do. I think an encyclopedia should stay out of that.
2600:
lawful response to suspecting someone is a burglar.
2536:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tNwVuRJnvgc&t=45
2440:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tNwVuRJnvgc&t=45
317:
CNN, Dakin Andone, Angela Barajas and Jason Morris.
3355:
These are sources who have clear political agendas.
2214:, as that is what most reliable sources are using. 3204:You don't start jogging from inside the building. 469:I've tagged the Background section as containing 2649:As the sources note, and as our article states, 2082:. The current phrasing does not imply anything. 1332:Can we change the archive period to 1 or 2 days? 2394:mistakenly show him entering the building????? 2306:down" both trying to support their worldview. 114:After seeing your comment and then another by 2617:https://www.adfontesmedia.com/?v=402f03a963ba 8: 3475:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tNwVuRJnvgc 3197:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igThcykZsZk 2335:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tNwVuRJnvgc 1845:down a Georgia street in broad daylight..." 189:Conflicting reports on theft from homeowner 3251: 1955: 1641: 1423: 1205: 1193:The following discussion has been closed. 1174: 1031:The following discussion has been closed. 1012: 699:at all? I cannot say this clearly enough: 2931:Me: -posts source saying the cup was red- 2916:Lol, I can't tell if you're joking or not 1094:Did you actually read the comment above? 478:proper Background on this event unless a 354:CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( 3377:he was running away from them. And this 3101:No, you are. The jogging thing is based 900:(covering the recently dead) is part of 3467: 3246:You see the dilemma here? I'm not even 1571:2A02:8388:1641:8380:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F 1375:2A02:8388:1641:8380:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F 1271:obstruction of an officer with violence 1150:obstruction of an officer with violence 1131: 242: 3364:I come to wikipedia to get apolitical 3081: 2650: 677: 344: 334: 267: 256: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3201:The jogging narrative is a fairytale. 3072:No, I'm not. I'm using, for example, 7: 3109:sources referring to it as "running" 2896:, none of the sources claim that he 1412:The following discussion is closed. 757:- Your edit removed the wikilink to 2939:"none of the sources claim that he 2920:"none of the sources claim that he 3421:. For your comments and response. 2376:. Look at the clock in the video. 1821:through a Georgia neighborhood..." 24: 945:For one, we certainly don't need 3459:The discussion above is closed. 3361:appropriate for an encyclopedia. 3336:There are no rules to Knowledge. 2834: 2333:Here is a bit more information: 1181:RfC on Arbery's criminal history 1019:RfC on Arbery's criminal history 29: 3076:source you cited, which states 766:be included as Background. -- 763:Glynn County Police Department 759:Glynn County Police Department 571:Glynn County Police Department 1: 3346:is exactly why it's included. 3172:- Knowledge has no firm rules 3170:Knowledge:Five pillars#WP:5P5 2372:For the fourth time, it is a 2794:Also screenshot this page 👉 2308:We do not know what happened 695:, are you familiar with the 292:Glawe, Justin (2020-05-05). 18:Talk:Murder of Ahmaud Arbery 3412:This problem is possibly a 3493: 3160:Knowledge:Ignore all rules 2851:dispute resolution options 1746:: "Ahmaud Arbery, 25, was 653:"one other editor" agrees 3461:Please do not modify it. 3454:03:53, 14 May 2020 (UTC) 3440:15:38, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 3396:13:41, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 3283:02:44, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 3232:02:02, 14 May 2020 (UTC) 3217:03:07, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 3152:02:50, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 3137:01:26, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 3097:01:07, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 3068:01:02, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 3054:00:56, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 3040:00:52, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 2981:00:32, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 2959:01:54, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 2912:00:57, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 2885:00:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 2871:23:23, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2810:20:15, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2784:20:43, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2767:20:35, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2752:20:26, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2738:20:10, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2724:20:04, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2705:19:42, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2688:20:07, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2664:19:26, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2645:19:13, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2631:19:06, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2610:18:54, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2591:19:20, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2576:19:06, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2561:18:48, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2547:18:45, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2530:18:43, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2515:17:51, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2493:17:32, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2468:20:54, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2451:20:21, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2433:20:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2419:17:51, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2404:17:25, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2386:17:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2368:17:15, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2348:17:08, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2328:17:12, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2300:16:55, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2272:21:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2240:08:55, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2224:07:27, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2206:06:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 2190:15:58, 10 May 2020 (UTC) 1788:running in a steady pace 1414:Please do not modify it. 1405:04:40, 15 May 2020 (UTC) 1383:03:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC) 1362:22:30, 13 May 2020 (UTC) 1346:18:32, 13 May 2020 (UTC) 1323:17:03, 13 May 2020 (UTC) 1297:16:31, 13 May 2020 (UTC) 1283:16:26, 13 May 2020 (UTC) 1265:02:38, 13 May 2020 (UTC) 1246:02:28, 13 May 2020 (UTC) 1220:22:38, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 1196:Please do not modify it. 1162:01:25, 13 May 2020 (UTC) 1122:01:11, 13 May 2020 (UTC) 1099:17:51, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 1090:17:09, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 1072:16:49, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 1034:Please do not modify it. 997:16:34, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 979:16:22, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 955:15:59, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 937:15:47, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 923:15:42, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 892:15:39, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 876:15:36, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 845:12:59, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 827:21:50, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 804:21:52, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 783:21:46, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 774:21:42, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 749:21:36, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 734:21:45, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 688:21:34, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 665:21:30, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 636:21:35, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 615:21:29, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 602:21:26, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 581:21:14, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 557:20:48, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 534:18:56, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 522:18:51, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 499:18:48, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 452:13:55, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 435:13:41, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 420:13:08, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 394:12:53, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 379:09:46, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 233:04:40, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 179:09:58, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 150:06:12, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 136:03:39, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 109:00:20, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 2928:You: "the cup was blue" 2796:WP:No original research 2175:20:03, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 2145:06:05, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 2120:05:19, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 2106:02:41, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 2060:02:28, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 2045:01:47, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 2013:01:27, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 1990:01:21, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 1970:00:30, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 1950:01:03, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 1919:02:41, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 1891:02:28, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 1874:01:54, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 1800:01:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 1778:03:27, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 1734:00:57, 9 May 2020 (UTC) 1686:18:35, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 1672:15:03, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 1656:07:38, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 1635:07:27, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 1621:03:35, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 1607:02:32, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 1593:02:10, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 1579:01:02, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 1562:00:24, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 1527:21:11, 7 May 2020 (UTC) 1442:18:47, 7 May 2020 (UTC) 404:we should not remove it 277:CS1 maint: url-status ( 2130:For the record, I did 1388:Jogging versus running 1253:while entirely unarmed 221: 206: 3025:Also for the dispute 2161:BLP violation removed 1188:there if interested. 1026:there if interested. 701:there is no synthesis 491:for this article. -- 465:in Background section 210: 195: 42:of past discussions. 712:completely different 3089:NorthBySouthBaranof 3046:NorthBySouthBaranof 2847:request for comment 2730:NorthBySouthBaranof 2656:NorthBySouthBaranof 2602:NorthBySouthBaranof 2583:NorthBySouthBaranof 1838:The Washington Post 1257:NorthBySouthBaranof 1255:eight years later. 674:NorthBySouthBaranof 514:NorthBySouthBaranof 1833:toward a truck..." 1826:The New York Times 1415: 564:: Sure, but which 506:The New York Times 347:has generic name ( 3446:Joseph A. Spadaro 3269: 3256:comment added by 2853:. Thank you. -- 2258:original research 2164: 2104: 2043: 1980:he was jogging. — 1972: 1960:comment added by 1917: 1872: 1776: 1732: 1658: 1646:comment added by 1552:he was jogging. — 1444: 1428:comment added by 1413: 1329: 1328: 1222: 1210:comment added by 1184:" to comment and 1168: 1167: 1096:Black Kite (talk) 1022:" to comment and 994:Black Kite (talk) 952:Black Kite (talk) 842:Black Kite (talk) 825: 802: 732: 634: 600: 555: 266:Missing or empty 87: 86: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3484: 3477: 3472: 3431: 3426: 3420: 3027:User:SharabSalam 2973: 2904: 2867: 2866: 2860: 2859: 2838: 2802: 2392:time lapse video 2374:time lapse video 2358:he was jogging" 2264: 2158: 2102: 2095: 2050:trying to push. 2041: 2034: 1942: 1915: 1908: 1870: 1863: 1774: 1767: 1752:authorities said 1730: 1723: 1536: 1535: 1460:. This includes 1198: 1175: 1141: 1136: 1068: 1065: 1062: 1059: 1056: 1053: 1036: 1013: 970: 965: 927:Thanks for that. 914: 909: 867: 862: 856: 819: 796: 726: 628: 594: 549: 360: 359: 352: 346: 342: 340: 332: 330: 329: 314: 308: 307: 305: 304: 289: 283: 282: 275: 269: 264: 262: 254: 247: 175: 172: 169: 166: 163: 160: 124:file's talk page 121: 107: 105: 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3492: 3491: 3487: 3486: 3485: 3483: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3473: 3469: 3465: 3464: 3429: 3424: 3417: 2971: 2902: 2864: 2863: 2857: 2856: 2800: 2262: 2100: 2039: 1940: 1913: 1868: 1772: 1728: 1532: 1470:Washington Post 1418: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1390: 1370: 1334: 1212:205.178.122.220 1194: 1173: 1152:" be relevant? 1146: 1145: 1144: 1137: 1133: 1066: 1063: 1060: 1057: 1054: 1051: 1032: 1011: 1009:Criminal record 968: 963: 912: 907: 865: 860: 850: 837: 467: 365: 364: 363: 353: 343: 333: 327: 325: 316: 315: 311: 302: 300: 298:The Daily Beast 291: 290: 286: 276: 265: 255: 249: 248: 244: 191: 173: 170: 167: 164: 161: 158: 115: 101: 99: 92: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3490: 3488: 3479: 3478: 3466: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3411: 3410: 3409: 3408: 3407: 3406: 3405: 3404: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3383: 3362: 3352:not the point. 3347: 3343: 3340: 3328: 3319: 3316: 3312: 3304: 3298: 3288: 3244: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3239: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3234: 3205: 3202: 3199: 3194: 3187: 3184: 3173: 3167: 3157: 3115: 3110: 3023: 3018: 3013: 3008: 3003: 3000: 2995: 2990: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2935: 2932: 2929: 2926: 2917: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2823: 2822: 2821: 2820: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2633: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2532: 2502: 2498: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2470: 2453: 2435: 2370: 2340:Aussiewikilady 2331: 2330: 2312:We don't know. 2277: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2232:118.208.20.226 2227: 2226: 2198:118.208.20.226 2193: 2192: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1952: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1834: 1822: 1781: 1780: 1737: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1664:93.159.149.134 1565: 1564: 1530: 1529: 1517: 1430:Aussiewikilady 1419: 1410: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1389: 1386: 1369: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1333: 1330: 1327: 1326: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1251:a city street 1200: 1199: 1190: 1189: 1172: 1169: 1166: 1165: 1143: 1142: 1130: 1129: 1125: 1114:118.208.20.226 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1092: 1075: 1074: 1038: 1037: 1028: 1027: 1010: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 984: 983: 982: 981: 942: 941: 940: 939: 929:118.208.20.226 884:118.208.20.226 879: 878: 836: 833: 832: 831: 830: 829: 808: 807: 806: 742: 741: 740: 739: 738: 737: 736: 718: 715: 704: 646: 645: 644: 643: 642: 641: 640: 639: 638: 538: 537: 536: 466: 460: 459: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 444:104.13.110.123 437: 427:104.13.110.123 386:104.13.110.123 381: 362: 361: 309: 284: 241: 240: 236: 190: 187: 186: 185: 184: 183: 182: 181: 91: 88: 85: 84: 79: 74: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3489: 3476: 3471: 3468: 3462: 3455: 3451: 3447: 3443: 3442: 3441: 3438: 3436: 3432: 3427: 3415: 3397: 3393: 3389: 3384: 3380: 3376: 3372: 3367: 3363: 3360: 3356: 3353: 3348: 3344: 3341: 3337: 3333: 3329: 3327: 3324: 3320: 3317: 3313: 3310: 3305: 3303: 3299: 3296: 3292: 3289: 3286: 3285: 3284: 3280: 3276: 3271: 3270: 3267: 3263: 3259: 3255: 3249: 3245: 3233: 3229: 3225: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3214: 3210: 3206: 3203: 3200: 3198: 3195: 3192: 3188: 3185: 3182: 3178: 3174: 3171: 3168: 3165: 3161: 3158: 3155: 3154: 3153: 3149: 3145: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3134: 3130: 3125: 3120: 3116: 3114: 3111: 3108: 3104: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3094: 3090: 3086: 3083: 3079: 3075: 3071: 3070: 3069: 3065: 3061: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3051: 3047: 3043: 3042: 3041: 3037: 3033: 3028: 3024: 3022: 3019: 3017: 3014: 3012: 3009: 3007: 3004: 3001: 2999: 2996: 2994: 2991: 2988: 2984: 2983: 2982: 2978: 2974: 2972:SharʿabSalam▼ 2968: 2960: 2956: 2952: 2948: 2946: 2942: 2936: 2933: 2930: 2927: 2925: 2923: 2918: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2909: 2905: 2903:SharʿabSalam▼ 2899: 2895: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2882: 2878: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2869: 2868: 2861: 2852: 2849:or alternate 2848: 2844: 2842: 2837: 2811: 2807: 2803: 2801:SharʿabSalam▼ 2797: 2793: 2785: 2781: 2777: 2774: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2764: 2760: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2749: 2745: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2735: 2731: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2721: 2717: 2713: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2702: 2698: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2672: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2661: 2657: 2652: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2621: 2618: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2607: 2603: 2598: 2592: 2588: 2584: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2573: 2569: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2544: 2540: 2537: 2533: 2531: 2527: 2523: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2512: 2508: 2503: 2499: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2469: 2465: 2461: 2458: 2454: 2452: 2448: 2444: 2441: 2436: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2416: 2412: 2409:insinuation. 2407: 2406: 2405: 2401: 2397: 2393: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2371: 2369: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2345: 2341: 2336: 2329: 2325: 2321: 2317: 2313: 2309: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2297: 2293: 2288: 2283: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2263:SharʿabSalam▼ 2259: 2255: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2228: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2167:63.155.99.218 2162: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2133: 2129: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2099: 2093: 2089: 2085: 2081: 2080: 2075: 2074: 2069: 2068: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2057: 2053: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2038: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2010: 2006: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1974: 1973: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1962:98.238.206.57 1959: 1953: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1941:SharʿabSalam▼ 1937: 1934: 1933: 1920: 1912: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1867: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1844: 1840: 1839: 1835: 1832: 1828: 1827: 1823: 1820: 1816: 1813: 1812: 1810: 1806: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1779: 1771: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1738: 1736: 1735: 1727: 1721: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1704: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1660: 1659: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1648:36.37.140.139 1645: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1604: 1600: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1567: 1566: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1546: 1542: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1515: 1514:Buzzfeed News 1511: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1450: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1417: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1387: 1385: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1368:William Bryan 1367: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1331: 1325: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1234: 1229: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1202: 1201: 1197: 1192: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1182: 1177: 1176: 1170: 1164: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1140: 1135: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1097: 1093: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1073: 1070: 1069: 1047: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1035: 1030: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1020: 1015: 1014: 1008: 998: 995: 990: 989: 988: 987: 986: 985: 980: 977: 975: 971: 966: 958: 957: 956: 953: 948: 944: 943: 938: 934: 930: 926: 925: 924: 921: 919: 915: 910: 903: 899: 895: 894: 893: 889: 885: 881: 880: 877: 874: 872: 868: 863: 854: 849: 848: 847: 846: 843: 834: 828: 823: 818: 817: 812: 809: 805: 800: 795: 794: 789: 786: 785: 784: 781: 777: 776: 775: 772: 769: 764: 760: 756: 753: 752: 751: 750: 747: 735: 730: 725: 724: 719: 716: 713: 709: 705: 702: 698: 694: 691: 690: 689: 686: 683: 679: 675: 671: 668: 667: 666: 662: 658: 654: 650: 647: 637: 632: 627: 626: 621: 618: 617: 616: 613: 610: 605: 604: 603: 598: 593: 592: 587: 584: 583: 582: 579: 576: 572: 567: 563: 560: 559: 558: 553: 548: 547: 542: 539: 535: 532: 529: 525: 524: 523: 519: 515: 511: 507: 503: 502: 501: 500: 497: 494: 490: 486: 481: 476: 472: 464: 461: 453: 449: 445: 441: 438: 436: 432: 428: 423: 422: 421: 417: 413: 409: 405: 401: 397: 396: 395: 391: 387: 382: 380: 376: 372: 367: 366: 357: 350: 338: 324: 320: 313: 310: 299: 295: 288: 285: 280: 273: 260: 252: 246: 243: 239: 235: 234: 230: 226: 220: 217: 213: 209: 205: 201: 198: 194: 188: 180: 177: 176: 153: 152: 151: 147: 143: 139: 138: 137: 133: 129: 125: 119: 113: 112: 111: 110: 106: 104: 97: 96:MOS:LEADIMAGE 89: 83: 80: 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3470: 3460: 3422: 3414:Gordian Knot 3378: 3374: 3370: 3365: 3358: 3354: 3351: 3335: 3322: 3308: 3301: 3294: 3290: 3252:— Preceding 3247: 3190: 3180: 3176: 3163: 3123: 3118: 3106: 3102: 3077: 3074:The Guardian 3073: 3020: 3010: 2997: 2986: 2944: 2940: 2938: 2921: 2919: 2897: 2854: 2839: 2711: 2675: 2355: 2338:quite fast? 2332: 2315: 2311: 2307: 2278: 2253: 2249: 2245: 2211: 2194: 2155: 2131: 2079:running from 2078: 2077: 2073:running away 2072: 2071: 2066: 2065: 2018: 1977: 1956:— Preceding 1935: 1842: 1837: 1830: 1825: 1818: 1808: 1804: 1751: 1747: 1739: 1707: 1706: 1642:— Preceding 1549: 1540: 1531: 1486:The Guardian 1457: 1453: 1448: 1424:— Preceding 1420: 1411: 1397:AzureCitizen 1371: 1354:AzureCitizen 1335: 1312: 1270: 1252: 1227: 1206:— Preceding 1203: 1195: 1180: 1171:Priors again 1149: 1147: 1134: 1126: 1111: 1050: 1033: 1018: 961: 905: 858: 838: 814: 791: 743: 721: 711: 700: 697:law of holes 676:agrees that 623: 589: 565: 544: 509: 505: 485:unverifiable 479: 474: 468: 403: 399: 326:. Retrieved 322: 312: 301:. Retrieved 297: 287: 245: 237: 225:Tambourine60 222: 218: 214: 211: 207: 202: 199: 196: 192: 157: 128:AzureCitizen 102: 93: 65: 43: 37: 3323:Just watch. 3224:Miss HollyJ 2157:jogging.... 2137:BarrelProof 2112:Miss HollyJ 2052:Miss HollyJ 2005:Miss HollyJ 1982:BarrelProof 1978:family said 1883:Miss HollyJ 1792:Miss HollyJ 1678:Miss HollyJ 1627:Miss HollyJ 1613:BarrelProof 1599:Miss HollyJ 1585:BarrelProof 1554:BarrelProof 1519:Miss HollyJ 1233:SharabSalam 710:,. That is 36:This is an 2390:How would 2248:saying he 1534:(Redacted) 1127:References 853:Black Kite 835:BLP issues 788:Neutrality 780:Neutrality 755:Neutrality 746:Neutrality 408:Black Kite 328:2020-05-12 303:2020-05-12 238:References 103:DanielleTH 90:Lead Image 3388:Chrisvacc 3326:the tape. 3315:happened. 3258:Chrisvacc 3209:Chrisvacc 3183:accurate. 3164:ignore it 3129:Chrisvacc 3060:Chrisvacc 3032:Chrisvacc 2951:Chrisvacc 2947:jogging." 2924:jogging." 2894:Chrisvacc 2877:Chrisvacc 2843:Response: 2776:Chrisvacc 2744:Chrisvacc 2716:Chrisvacc 2680:Chrisvacc 2637:Chrisvacc 2623:Chrisvacc 2568:Chrisvacc 2539:Chrisvacc 2522:Chrisvacc 2485:Chrisvacc 2460:Chrisvacc 2443:Chrisvacc 2425:Chrisvacc 2396:Chrisvacc 2360:Chrisvacc 2320:Chrisvacc 2292:Chrisvacc 2182:Nil Einne 2084:Nice4What 2023:Nice4What 1897:Nice4What 1852:Nice4What 1756:Nice4What 1712:Nice4What 1506:USA Today 1352:Regards, 1315:Topcat777 1275:Topcat777 1238:Chrisvacc 1154:Topcat777 811:Netoholic 768:Netoholic 693:Netoholic 682:Netoholic 649:Netoholic 620:Netoholic 609:Netoholic 586:Netoholic 575:Netoholic 541:Netoholic 528:Netoholic 493:Netoholic 489:off-topic 259:cite news 82:Archive 5 77:Archive 4 72:Archive 3 66:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 3425:starship 3275:Koncorde 3266:contribs 3254:unsigned 3189:You can 3144:Koncorde 3107:reliable 2697:Koncorde 2507:Koncorde 2411:Koncorde 2092:contribs 2031:contribs 1958:unsigned 1905:contribs 1860:contribs 1815:ABC News 1764:contribs 1720:contribs 1644:unsigned 1498:BBC News 1494:ABC News 1478:The Hill 1474:Fox News 1466:CBS News 1438:contribs 1426:unsigned 1338:Jax 0677 1208:unsigned 964:starship 947:WP:UNDUE 908:starship 861:starship 708:WP:UNDUE 670:Muboshgu 657:Muboshgu 566:specific 510:original 475:pre-date 471:WP:SYNTH 463:WP:SYNTH 371:Koncorde 337:cite web 3419:Georgia 3366:factual 3248:stating 3191:clearly 3078:as fact 2922:was not 2898:was not 2712:alleged 2501:rights. 2260:here.-- 2246:are not 2212:Jogging 2067:running 1936:Jogging 1843:running 1831:running 1819:running 1748:jogging 1740:Jogging 1545:Jogging 1541:Running 1454:jogging 1449:Jogging 1228:serious 268:|title= 142:KasiaNL 122:on the 94:So per 39:archive 3430:.paint 3339:false. 3332:WP:IAR 3309:always 3103:solely 2865:(Talk) 2254:wasn't 2250:wasn't 2098:Thanks 2070:, not 2037:Thanks 1911:Thanks 1866:Thanks 1770:Thanks 1726:Thanks 1458:jogger 1104:story: 969:.paint 913:.paint 902:WP:BLP 898:WP:BDP 866:.paint 487:, and 480:recent 440:Drmies 412:Drmies 400:really 345:|last= 118:Pmsyyz 3375:clear 3357:It's 3295:shred 3291:Bingo 3124:which 2985:It's 2759:O3000 2553:O3000 2378:O3000 1482:MSNBC 1456:or a 1289:O3000 1186:!VOTE 1082:O3000 1067:Focus 1024:!VOTE 896:118, 822:help! 799:help! 729:help! 631:help! 597:help! 552:help! 174:Focus 16:< 3450:talk 3435:talk 3392:talk 3379:will 3279:talk 3262:talk 3228:talk 3213:talk 3181:more 3177:less 3148:talk 3133:talk 3093:talk 3064:talk 3050:talk 3036:talk 2977:talk 2955:talk 2941:was 2908:talk 2881:talk 2858:LuK3 2806:talk 2780:talk 2763:talk 2748:talk 2734:talk 2720:talk 2701:talk 2684:talk 2676:both 2660:talk 2641:talk 2627:talk 2606:talk 2587:talk 2572:talk 2557:talk 2543:talk 2526:talk 2511:talk 2489:talk 2464:talk 2447:talk 2429:talk 2415:talk 2400:talk 2382:talk 2364:talk 2356:said 2344:talk 2324:talk 2316:said 2296:talk 2268:talk 2236:talk 2220:talk 2216:WWGB 2202:talk 2186:talk 2171:talk 2141:talk 2116:talk 2094:) – 2088:talk 2056:talk 2033:) – 2027:talk 2019:your 2009:talk 1986:talk 1966:talk 1946:talk 1907:) – 1901:talk 1887:talk 1862:) – 1856:talk 1809:your 1796:talk 1766:) – 1760:talk 1742:per 1722:) – 1716:talk 1708:Both 1682:talk 1668:talk 1652:talk 1631:talk 1617:talk 1603:talk 1589:talk 1575:talk 1558:talk 1550:said 1523:talk 1512:and 1510:Vice 1434:talk 1401:talk 1379:talk 1358:talk 1342:talk 1319:talk 1293:talk 1279:talk 1261:talk 1242:talk 1216:talk 1158:talk 1118:talk 1086:talk 974:talk 933:talk 918:talk 888:talk 871:talk 661:talk 518:talk 448:talk 431:talk 416:talk 390:talk 375:talk 356:link 349:help 279:link 272:help 229:talk 146:talk 132:talk 3371:not 3359:not 2987:not 2945:not 2943:not 2798:.-- 2132:not 2076:or 1754:." 1744:CNN 1502:Vox 1490:NPR 1462:CNN 816:Guy 793:Guy 723:Guy 717:OK? 625:Guy 591:Guy 562:Guy 546:Guy 323:CNN 3452:) 3394:) 3281:) 3268:) 3264:• 3230:) 3215:) 3150:) 3135:) 3095:) 3087:. 3080:, 3066:) 3052:) 3038:) 2979:) 2957:) 2949:– 2910:) 2883:) 2841:3O 2808:) 2782:) 2765:) 2750:) 2736:) 2722:) 2703:) 2686:) 2662:) 2643:) 2629:) 2608:) 2589:) 2574:) 2559:) 2545:) 2528:) 2513:) 2491:) 2466:) 2449:) 2431:) 2417:) 2402:) 2384:) 2366:) 2346:) 2326:) 2298:) 2270:) 2238:) 2222:) 2204:) 2188:) 2173:) 2143:) 2118:) 2090:· 2058:) 2029:· 2011:) 1988:) 1968:) 1948:) 1903:· 1889:) 1858:· 1798:) 1762:· 1718:· 1684:) 1670:) 1654:) 1633:) 1619:) 1605:) 1591:) 1577:) 1560:) 1525:) 1516:. 1508:, 1504:, 1500:, 1496:, 1492:, 1488:, 1484:, 1480:, 1476:, 1472:, 1468:, 1464:, 1440:) 1436:• 1403:) 1381:) 1360:) 1344:) 1321:) 1295:) 1281:) 1273:. 1263:) 1244:) 1218:) 1160:) 1120:) 1088:) 935:) 904:. 890:) 672:- 663:) 520:) 450:) 433:) 418:) 406:? 392:) 377:) 341:: 339:}} 335:{{ 321:. 296:. 263:: 261:}} 257:{{ 231:) 148:) 134:) 3448:( 3437:) 3433:( 3390:( 3277:( 3260:( 3226:( 3211:( 3166:. 3146:( 3131:( 3091:( 3062:( 3048:( 3034:( 2975:( 2953:( 2906:( 2879:( 2804:( 2778:( 2761:( 2746:( 2732:( 2718:( 2699:( 2682:( 2658:( 2639:( 2625:( 2604:( 2585:( 2570:( 2555:( 2541:( 2524:( 2509:( 2487:( 2462:( 2445:( 2427:( 2413:( 2398:( 2380:( 2362:( 2342:( 2322:( 2294:( 2266:( 2234:( 2218:( 2200:( 2184:( 2169:( 2165:. 2163:) 2159:( 2139:( 2135:— 2114:( 2103:) 2101:♥ 2096:( 2086:( 2054:( 2042:) 2040:♥ 2035:( 2025:( 2007:( 1984:( 1964:( 1944:( 1916:) 1914:♥ 1909:( 1899:( 1885:( 1871:) 1869:♥ 1864:( 1854:( 1794:( 1775:) 1773:♥ 1768:( 1758:( 1731:) 1729:♥ 1724:( 1714:( 1680:( 1666:( 1650:( 1629:( 1615:( 1601:( 1587:( 1573:( 1556:( 1521:( 1432:( 1399:( 1377:( 1356:( 1340:( 1317:( 1291:( 1277:( 1259:( 1240:( 1214:( 1156:( 1116:( 1084:( 1064:m 1061:a 1058:e 1055:r 1052:D 976:) 972:( 931:( 920:) 916:( 886:( 873:) 869:( 855:: 851:@ 824:) 820:( 801:) 797:( 771:@ 731:) 727:( 714:. 685:@ 659:( 633:) 629:( 612:@ 599:) 595:( 578:@ 554:) 550:( 531:@ 516:( 496:@ 446:( 429:( 414:( 388:( 373:( 358:) 351:) 331:. 306:. 281:) 274:) 270:( 253:. 227:( 171:m 168:a 165:e 162:r 159:D 144:( 130:( 120:: 116:@ 50:.

Index

Talk:Murder of Ahmaud Arbery
archive
current talk page
Archive 1
Archive 2
Archive 3
Archive 4
Archive 5
MOS:LEADIMAGE
DanielleTH
00:20, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Pmsyyz
file's talk page
AzureCitizen
talk
03:39, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
KasiaNL
talk
06:12, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Dream Focus
09:58, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Tambourine60
talk
04:40, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/05/09/georgia-attorney-general-investigate-local-officials-handling-ahmaud-arberys-murder/
cite news
help
link
"'It's Murder': This Shooting of an Unarmed Black Man Is Roiling Georgia"
"A suspect in the killing of Ahmaud Arbery was involved in a previous investigation of him, recused prosecutor says"

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.