74:
53:
22:
177:
It simply is not a term that is in use, but rather a term you want to bring into use. The books that introduced that term are about as obscure as it is possible to get, and I would be surprised to find that any one but you, or other specialists in esotericism, has read them in decades.
195:
well that's the whole thing about an encyclopaedia. It shouldn't just be about well-known knowledge, but also about less well known knowledge. Obviously, not all of
Knowledge (XXG)'s one million plus pages are on well known subjects
254:
Scientology was not particularly influenced by
Aleister Crowley. Although L. Ron Hubbard's respect for Crowley is unquestioned, there is little similarity between Scientology theology and Thelema theology.--
299:
Outdated; Benjamin Creme is called current but died in recent years: whoever edits this more should move him to historical section or update sections such as by century.--
273:
Firestar464 I did explain why I removed the advertising guff. Can you please restore my edit? Fine if you want to move that content to where it belongs.
124:
326:
114:
150:
The term Neo-Theosophy is not in general use, and this article seems an effort to to introduce it into use. That amounts to
Original Research.
331:
321:
90:
255:
238:
The term definitely in use: I haven't read those in decades, though was in decades before this article, and discussed with many people.
280:
141:
There is no reason for this as a separate article. If it can not be merged with another article, it would be better to remove it.
81:
58:
33:
251:
So what is Neo
Theosophy about? There's a lot of names and dates in the article but no comparison to old Theosophy.
39:
21:
259:
276:
284:
89:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
161:
304:
197:
165:
315:
300:
73:
52:
218:
179:
160:
No it's not original research, nor am I trying to introduce a neologism. See
151:
142:
85:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the
307:
288:
263:
221:
200:
182:
168:
154:
145:
86:
217:
In
Knowledge (XXG) you seem the Johny Appleseed of Neo-Theosophy.
15:
164:or follow the links at the bottom of the page
8:
19:
274:
47:
49:
7:
79:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
99:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Occult
14:
72:
51:
20:
119:This article has been rated as
327:Low-importance Occult articles
1:
289:11:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
93:and see a list of open tasks.
332:WikiProject Occult articles
322:Start-Class Occult articles
308:12:22, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
102:Template:WikiProject Occult
348:
125:project's importance scale
222:11:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
201:01:32, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
118:
67:
46:
183:11:17, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
169:03:09, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
155:21:19, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
146:18:12, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
264:05:43, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
28:This article is rated
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
162:Google Book Search
82:WikiProject Occult
34:content assessment
291:
279:comment added by
139:
138:
135:
134:
131:
130:
339:
107:
106:
103:
100:
97:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
347:
346:
342:
341:
340:
338:
337:
336:
312:
311:
303:☀️🕉︎☉🦉🐝🐍☤☆(
297:
271:
249:
105:Occult articles
104:
101:
98:
95:
94:
61:
29:
12:
11:
5:
345:
343:
335:
334:
329:
324:
314:
313:
296:
293:
270:
267:
248:
245:
244:
243:
242:
241:
240:
239:
231:
230:
229:
228:
227:
226:
225:
224:
208:
207:
206:
205:
204:
203:
188:
187:
186:
185:
172:
171:
137:
136:
133:
132:
129:
128:
121:Low-importance
117:
111:
110:
108:
91:the discussion
77:
65:
64:
62:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
344:
333:
330:
328:
325:
323:
320:
319:
317:
310:
309:
306:
302:
294:
292:
290:
286:
282:
278:
268:
266:
265:
261:
257:
256:67.52.196.238
252:
246:
237:
236:
235:
234:
233:
232:
223:
220:
216:
215:
214:
213:
212:
211:
210:
209:
202:
199:
198:M Alan Kazlev
194:
193:
192:
191:
190:
189:
184:
181:
176:
175:
174:
173:
170:
167:
166:M Alan Kazlev
163:
159:
158:
157:
156:
153:
148:
147:
144:
126:
122:
116:
113:
112:
109:
92:
88:
84:
83:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
298:
275:— Preceding
272:
253:
250:
149:
140:
120:
80:
40:WikiProjects
281:82.69.49.83
269:explanation
247:what is it?
30:Start-class
316:Categories
301:dchmelik
295:outdated
277:unsigned
123:on the
96:Occult
87:occult
59:Occult
36:scale.
219:Kwork
180:Kwork
152:Kwork
143:Kwork
305:talk
285:talk
260:talk
115:Low
318::
287:)
262:)
283:(
258:(
127:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
