Knowledge

Talk:Smith number

Source 📝

253: 243: 222: 191: 437:
Maybe he was trying to figure out a way to remember the phone number. As I grow older, my memory fades, but my mental computing ability remains undiminished. I can't remember anyone's phone number, but I can remember, for example, that my hunting buddy Keith's phone number is a concatenation of two
468:
The end of the article contains the line "There are 94 feet from one end of a basketball court to the other end (from basket to basket)." I'm not sure how this is relevant to the content of the article (except for the fact that "94" happens to be a Smith number, although that fact isn't mentioned
354:
Also, I should explain why I didn't like the examples given in the older article. To select 666 and 1776 out of so many other available examples strikes me as being, intentional or not, an anti-American POV. There ought to be places to express this POV, but a Knowledge article on an abstract
335:. Obviously, one of them had to become a redirect to the other. But which one? The plural form one was older, its first draft dating back to August 30, 2003. But the singular one was more in line with the convention for so many other articles on kinds of numbers, for example, 518:
article (now a redirect) without questioning it. It's not mentioned in Mathworld's article. We'll have to look at the history of the redirected article to see if we can find who originally wrote that and what their source was.
153: 309: 147: 412:
Smith numbers were named by Albert Wilansky of Lehigh University for his brother-in-law Harold Smith, who noticed the property in his phone number (4937775).
620: 299: 79: 615: 275: 532:"Fascinating" implies that smith number get rarer, and sttes only an average denisty of 2.41% for the first 10^10 integers. So I took it out. 85: 44: 565:
and not for the article) says 2335807857 (around 2.34%) Smith numbers below 10^11. I would certainly expect the ratio to converge to 0.
370:. I learned the things about Smith numbers that I had been wanting to know (such as why "Smith"?) and I say thanks to those writers. 266: 227: 99: 30: 104: 20: 168: 74: 135: 202: 65: 554:
I realize this section is from 2005. It was good to take it out the 3% claim. It was in the original 2003 version
537: 504: 482: 190: 129: 597:
supports the claim that there are infinitely many palindromic Smith numbers? That would be great. Thanks,
109: 447:
And just for the heck of it, I should mention that the sum of the digits in Harold Smith's phone number is
470: 125: 570: 208: 252: 593:
McDaniel,W.L., "Palindromic Smith numbers", Journal of Recreational Mathematics, 19(1987), pp. 34-37.
534: 501: 479: 331:
When I first drafted this article, I had no idea that there was already an article on the subject at
175: 348: 161: 55: 274:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
426: 258: 70: 242: 221: 340: 51: 351:. Number articles with the title in the plural form are the exception, rather than the rule. 566: 598: 141: 358:
Nevertheless I'm very appreciative of the efforts of the writers of the older article,
336: 609: 520: 515: 452: 423: 394: 371: 367: 332: 562: 558: 497:
It is believed that about 3% of any million consecutive integers are Smith numbers.
381: 363: 359: 344: 24: 448: 271: 474: 248: 473:
23:53, 10 October 2005 (UTC) It seems to be wrong as well accroding to
589:
Can someone with access to this journal check to see if this article
380:
All I did to the old article was fix a link, but thank you anyway ;)
601: 574: 541: 523: 508: 486: 455: 429: 397: 384: 374: 184: 15: 469:
here). Is there some reason this text has been included?
555: 160: 270:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 438:consecutive Keith numbers plus a perfect number. 355:mathematical concept should not be one of them. 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 514:I think that's something I copied from the old 174: 8: 188: 585:Infinitely many palindromic Smith numbers? 216: 218: 7: 264:This article is within the scope of 207:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 14: 621:Low-priority mathematics articles 284:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 616:Start-Class mathematics articles 287:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 251: 241: 220: 189: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 304:This article has been rated as 1: 278:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 602:22:41, 16 October 2007 (UTC) 561:. My own unpublished count ( 542:20:22, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 524:15:45, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 509:14:58, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 487:20:18, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 575:00:38, 24 August 2008 (UTC) 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 637: 456:18:19, 5 August 2005 (UTC) 430:14:54, 4 August 2005 (UTC) 303: 236: 215: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 398:20:39, 13 May 2004 (UTC) 385:23:26, 12 May 2004 (UTC) 375:21:31, 12 May 2004 (UTC) 327:My Rationale For Merging 310:project's priority scale 464:Basketball Court Length 267:WikiProject Mathematics 197:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 499:This seems unlikely. 100:Neutral point of view 557:of Smith numbers by 290:mathematics articles 105:No original research 349:super-Poulet number 422:bored was he????? 259:Mathematics portal 203:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 563:original research 406:Telephone numbers 341:triangular number 324: 323: 320: 319: 316: 315: 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 628: 393:You're welcome. 292: 291: 288: 285: 282: 261: 256: 255: 245: 238: 237: 232: 224: 217: 200: 194: 193: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 636: 635: 631: 630: 629: 627: 626: 625: 606: 605: 587: 494: 471:172.193.167.184 466: 408: 329: 289: 286: 283: 280: 279: 257: 250: 230: 201:on Knowledge's 198: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 634: 632: 624: 623: 618: 608: 607: 595: 594: 586: 583: 582: 581: 580: 579: 578: 577: 547: 546: 545: 544: 527: 526: 493: 490: 465: 462: 461: 460: 459: 458: 442: 441: 440: 439: 415: 414: 407: 404: 403: 402: 401: 400: 388: 387: 337:perfect number 328: 325: 322: 321: 318: 317: 314: 313: 302: 296: 295: 293: 276:the discussion 263: 262: 246: 234: 233: 225: 213: 212: 206: 195: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 633: 622: 619: 617: 614: 613: 611: 604: 603: 600: 592: 591: 590: 584: 576: 572: 568: 564: 560: 556: 553: 552: 551: 550: 549: 548: 543: 540: 539: 536: 531: 530: 529: 528: 525: 522: 517: 516:Smith numbers 513: 512: 511: 510: 507: 506: 503: 498: 491: 489: 488: 485: 484: 481: 476: 472: 463: 457: 454: 450: 446: 445: 444: 443: 436: 435: 434: 433: 432: 431: 428: 425: 421: 420: 413: 410: 409: 405: 399: 396: 392: 391: 390: 389: 386: 383: 379: 378: 377: 376: 373: 369: 368:User:SGBailey 365: 361: 356: 352: 350: 346: 342: 338: 334: 333:Smith numbers 326: 311: 307: 301: 298: 297: 294: 277: 273: 269: 268: 260: 254: 249: 247: 244: 240: 239: 235: 229: 226: 223: 219: 214: 210: 204: 196: 192: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 596: 588: 559:User:Kwantus 533: 500: 496: 495: 478: 467: 418: 417: 416: 411: 364:User:Fredrik 360:User:Kwantus 357: 353: 345:Keith number 330: 306:Low-priority 305: 265: 231:Low‑priority 209:WikiProjects 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 25:Smith number 19:This is the 567:PrimeHunter 281:Mathematics 272:mathematics 228:Mathematics 199:Start-class 148:free images 31:not a forum 610:Categories 599:Doctormatt 538:Farmbrough 505:Farmbrough 492:Reference? 483:Farmbrough 475:basketball 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 521:PrimeFan 453:PrimeFan 424:sjorford 395:PrimeFan 372:PrimeFan 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 382:Fredrik 308:on the 154:WP refs 142:scholar 205:scale. 126:Google 535:Rich 502:Rich 480:Rich 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 571:talk 366:and 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 427:→•← 419:How 300:Low 176:TWL 612:: 573:) 477:. 451:. 449:42 362:, 347:, 343:, 339:, 156:) 54:; 569:( 312:. 211:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Smith number
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Mathematics
WikiProject icon
icon

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.