960:
1421:. About the only work-around would be to switch over to a very insecure Internet Explorer and allow Google (and the Web site imposing the reCAPTCHA) to do whatever it wants to my computer. The difficulty of dealing with reCAPTCHA has become such a severe hindrance that I no longer bother trying to access sites that require regular interaction with this system. I can only pray that Knowledge (XXG) never adopts reCAPTCHA as well.
366:
716:
619:
496:
598:
468:
306:
279:
564:
482:
248:
219:
1248:
wouldn't consider a picture from a techCrunch article as a reliable source, btw. People often embellish their articles with some random googled picture. Anyway, if this is the case (i.e. two-word captchas wrongly branded as recaptchas have been widely used), then it would be worth mentioning in the article. This is what "true" (but old) recaptchas looked like:
404:
1090:
99% of the SPAM I find in my Inbox would go away instantly. And if you are from one of those domains and you're now offended, DO NOT whine at me, do something about your friends and countrymen sending SPAM!! Be part of the solution, not the problem. No one will complain (other than the SPAMmers and their cohorts) I assure you.
1369:
the other one is used to gather data from the user. The user supposedly doesn't know which is which and therefore supposedly gives the correct answer to both. The one in the example is obviously two generated words. Wherever it came from it's obviously wrong, if it was a "reliable" source, it was not reliable for this.
1416:
Surely, this section could further expound on the sheer difficulty of getting the reCAPTCHA system to work with browser that don't allow Google to have completely unmitigated access to scripts and cookies, which means Google will insist that the 'suspicious' user must solve an excess of 20+ reCAPTCHA
1368:
Lol The wrong image is still there. Or again. Look, it's really simple: a
Recaptcha has two images, one generated purposefully distorted and the other a real picture. The generated one is the one that is used to check whether the responder is human, because it's the one to which the answer is known;
1089:
If 1% of the effort involved in blaming ID schemes (like catcha, et al) and engineering ways to defeat them were instead aimed at killing off SPAMmers, there would be no need for them . Frankly, if Yahoo! and Google just blocked ALL email coming from all country-related domains (eg, .EU, .CH, etc.),
1073:
This page reads like an advert or an in-house history of the system written by its owners. A lot of work is need to make it more balanced and it is very concerning that attempts to add that balance have been deleted by people who should have spent time to add in some (readily available) references
1247:
I see your point That's a two-word captcha, yet it's (mis)branded as reCaptcha. I didn't remember ever seeing such thing, but judging from what Google Image returns for "recaptcha" I guess it was pretty common that websites misused the reCaptcha brand with what is really just a two-word captcha. I
1127:
article? It seems that the opposite of this article is happening in the CAPTCHA article, the fact that the article is written as an essay, but it focuses mainly on the negative aspects of CAPTCHA, particularly how inaccessible and circumventable it is. Maybe people could remove negative parts from
1348:
No, that actually was reCAPTCHA alright. The problem is the image on this
Knowledge (XXG) article only shows the inner box with the two words, while I think it would have been better to have included the surrounding frame with the name and trademark. But for those who do not trust the accuracy of
1108:
Most of the spam I get is from .com domains. Should .com be blocked? What about systems like
Knowledge (XXG) that don't require registration? Tying reCAPTCHA frustration back to the article, can someone find a reliable source explicitly comparing reCAPTCHA to other anti-spam systems? For example,
1290:
Btw, "it seems to have become more of a brand name than a noun used to describe double-distorted-word captchas." It was never supposed to describe "double-distorted-word captchas", that would be actually the misuse of the term we are talking about. And as far as I understand it has always been a
1553:"Some people were concerned when Google announced reCAPTCHA v3.0 about their privacy because of the vulnerability that people viewing the sites with reCAPTCHA v2.0 faced with the possibility of Google tracking them throughout the website as they now would have full control."
1585:
Article currently says in the introduction for V2 "if the analysis of cookies and canvas rendering suggested the page was being downloaded automatically." however the linked citation does not mention canvas rendering or cookies (at least, from what I can see).
1388:
As already stated in other posts here, this article is one of the badest I've read... it is like advertising this CAPTCHA system. And it seems critism is either removed or not allowed, especially as examples of breaking CAPTCHAs are missing, like this one:
1393:
I am pretty sure, if this linked article (resp the robust algorithm behind, which is not yet published, I think) would get more attention, those annoying CAPTCHAs would vanish from the web, as they not only distracting, they are also fake security.
1220:
I'm not sure it's still meaningful to talk of "a reCAPTCHA" any more - taking the article as a whole, it seems to have become more of a brand name than a noun used to describe double-distorted-word captchas. The image in question does seem to be
1465:
There is also no mention that it doesn't work without
Javascript and that Google "behavioral analysis" is biased toward Chrome users and those who doesnt' block Google spying stuff like Google analytics through plugins or other means.
1353:, under "How can I distinguish between different versions of reCAPTCHA?". (You may need to reload for archive.org to show the images.) And like Google says there: "reCAPTCHA V1 can take many forms, but here are the most common ones".
1329:
I've dug out a Forbes source to confirm that the 2010 image is representative of 2010 reCAPTCHAs. Both Forbes and TechCrunch are reliable sources, but if you've a serious reason to doubt their screenshots we can dig deeper.
481:
1487:
It's also not mentioned that it is very US-biased; many of the images presented for recognition require familiarity with US-style street furniture (such as fire hydrants) and terminology (such as "crosswalk").
153:
1639:
1067:
As well as restoring a general criticism section, this article should have a section on how poor it is for many disabled people. The audio alternative is inaccessible to deafblind people. See
435:
1261:
If people confuse things and use a thing under a brand that is supposed to represent another thing, Knowledge (XXG) should be the place to clarify it, not to reinforce the confusion
356:
1527:, published by Google who owns the copyright to reCAPTCHA, is licensed under CC-BY 3.0 and has an animation for reCAPTCHA which is almost identical to the fair use image here
1008:
Since last week Google is showing color pictures containing street numbers to solve. It's very possible they are fed from Google
Streetview to more accurately locate houses.
1109:
Knowledge (XXG) seems to be doing pretty well with its system of "most IP addresses can edit most articles, but some IPs are blocked and some articles are semi-protected".
1664:
1634:
346:
1531:. This one should be used over the fair use image, but I'm not an expert in video editing so I am unable to crop out the animation portion and convert it into a gif.
147:
322:
554:
79:
1417:
challenges all in one go. At this point, Google has so severely cracked down on browser security features that I can't actually pass any reCAPTCHA challenge
229:
1629:
1390:
758:
1649:
544:
380:
766:
669:
393:
313:
284:
1503:
Another example: unless you know that all US taxis are yellow, find the taxi becomes impossible, even peering at short distance on a large screen.
85:
1674:
1659:
659:
520:
1606:
1679:
1550:
Today, I made an edit to this article to correct some mistakes, reword some sentences and move others. I reworded the following paragraph:
1473:
1398:
1179:
30:
1559:"Concerns were raised regarding privacy when Google announced reCAPTCHA v3.0, as it allows Google to track users on non-Google websites."
773:
635:
1644:
1027:
826:
762:
1422:
1162:
1048:
1009:
893:
503:
473:
375:
289:
99:
44:
104:
20:
1669:
1251:
851:
74:
1654:
1128:
the CAPTCHA article, but leave this article alone, since there is a sufficient amount of criticism, and it is not undue weight?
743:
796:
751:
728:
626:
603:
259:
579:
or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the
1068:
65:
634:
and related topics on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1508:
1307:
1391:
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2013/10/captcha-busted-ai-company-claims-have-broken-internets-favorite-protection-system
168:
225:
843:
135:
418:
1350:
185:
572:
444:
Create the
Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
109:
988:
199:
1610:
1571:
1504:
1402:
1222:
976:
190:
1477:
1183:
790:
265:
1563:
1159:. Now, how does that work? How can the user both digitize AND verify that he is human with only one picture?
1031:
1166:
1136:
1052:
1013:
813:
739:
1469:
1295:
1277:
1044:
129:
1591:
1426:
1326:
Ah, my mistake. I meant it that way around because I thought you were saying the opposite. All good, then.
809:
516:
1536:
1497:
1481:
1460:
1430:
55:
830:
519:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
321:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
70:
125:
1602:
1587:
1532:
803:
247:
218:
1567:
1562:
I do not know what the original was attempting to say, so this may be incorrect. Can someone check
1354:
1114:
161:
1370:
1299:
1267:
1206:
1075:
1441:
1358:
1335:
1230:
1132:
1095:
994:
204:
175:
1451:
What do you mean by "reliable sources"? The fact is that ReCAPTCHA does not work --- PERIOD. ---
1256:
837:
1374:
1303:
1271:
1210:
1079:
900:
413:
318:
51:
1252:
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-xwewXT6Nwog/UmrAaB9q0bI/AAAAAAAANfk/KFAI72k3gFw/s1600/recaptcha.png
820:
576:
990:
959:
201:
1024:
1493:
1456:
1200:
The image on the right with this caption: "An example of a reCAPTCHA challenge from 2007"
847:
783:
779:
1546:
December 2020: Reworded a paragraph in a way that may be inaccurate to the source it uses
1397:
As if it is a joke, to enter this text I need to solve a CAPTCHA... as I said: ANNOYING!
1069:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/08/05/disability_groups_want_captchas_rendered_extinct/
1524:
1349:
Forbes and TechCrunch, see the archived version of Google's own reCAPTCHA support page
1155:
Yesterday I realized that sometimes ReCAPTCHA only shows one word. Example screenshot:
1110:
715:
141:
447:
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.
1623:
1437:
1331:
1244:
1226:
1091:
365:
1528:
1351:
https://web.archive.org/web/20160306194415/https://support.google.com/recaptcha/
618:
597:
495:
467:
1489:
1452:
563:
305:
278:
512:
24:
926:
Infobox Images with transparent areas needing a different background color
508:
1023:
On the
Wikimedia Commons there is an example picture of such a CAPTCHA:
1124:
1436:
Feel free to add any criticism that is supported by reliable sources.
403:
992:
888:
631:
203:
1156:
1614:
1595:
1575:
1540:
1512:
1445:
1406:
1378:
1362:
1339:
1311:
1281:
1234:
1214:
1187:
1170:
1140:
1118:
1099:
1083:
1056:
1035:
1017:
995:
953:
241:
213:
205:
15:
1257:
http://docs.whmcs.com/images/thumb/5/5a/Red.jpg/300px-Red.jpg
1225:, though; I'll attach that TechCrunch article as a source. --
562:
402:
364:
916:{{subst:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Google/Invite Members}}
1291:
brand name. Did you perhaps mean the other way around?
1566:
and reword what I have written as required? Thank you.
867:
704:
699:
694:
689:
1411:
160:
1529:
https://en.wikipedia.org/File:NoCAPTCHA_reCAPTCHA.gif
1026:
Can someone incorporate it in the article plz? thx --
1640:
B-Class Computer Security articles of Mid-importance
1525:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbvxFW4UJdU&t=10
630:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
507:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
317:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1151:
Now there are suddenly not two words, but only one!
174:
425:Review importance and quality of existing articles
1203:That is NOT a recaptcha, that's a plain captcha.
1178:By challenging another user and matching these.
428:Identify categories related to Computer Security
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1041:it's everywhere, whoever invented it stinks
331:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Computer Security
8:
1223:exactly what reCAPTCHAs looked like in 2007
759:Category:Unknown-importance Google articles
1467:
1042:
723:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
677:
592:
462:
434:Identify articles for creation (see also:
388:
273:
1665:Automatically assessed Computing articles
1635:Mid-importance Computer Security articles
1412:'Criticism' section is really understated
416:. Please allow some days for processing.
594:
464:
275:
245:
1063:System is unusable by deafblind people
580:
334:Template:WikiProject Computer Security
529:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Computing
7:
624:This article is within the scope of
501:This article is within the scope of
311:This article is within the scope of
1384:Missing entry in chapter "Security"
848:Gmail interface#Product integration
827:Category:Stub-Class Google articles
763:Category:Unassessed Google articles
264:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
1630:B-Class Computer Security articles
644:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Google
14:
1650:Mid-importance Computing articles
878:list if you like! (click here...)
441:Identify articles for improvement
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
958:
714:
617:
596:
494:
480:
466:
304:
277:
246:
217:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
664:This article has been rated as
549:This article has been rated as
351:This article has been rated as
224:This article was nominated for
1675:Low-importance Google articles
1660:All Computer Security articles
1157:http://i.imgur.com/BwHppTX.jpg
532:Template:WikiProject Computing
228:on 2 July 2007. The result of
1:
1576:13:04, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
1482:15:34, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
1407:07:45, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
1340:14:52, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
1312:13:47, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
1282:13:43, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
1235:13:21, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
1215:12:05, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
1188:10:58, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
1100:21:53, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
1036:05:38, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
738:of the other products listed
638:and see a list of open tasks.
523:and see a list of open tasks.
412:will be generated shortly by
394:WikiProject Computer Security
373:This article is supported by
325:and see a list of open tasks.
314:WikiProject Computer Security
42:Put new text under old text.
1541:23:29, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
1513:15:09, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
1461:23:53, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
1379:00:06, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
1141:04:37, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
1680:WikiProject Google articles
1596:20:51, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
1171:06:33, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
1084:23:29, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
1057:00:28, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
844:List of features in Android
647:Template:WikiProject Google
1696:
1645:B-Class Computing articles
1018:01:14, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
670:project's importance scale
555:project's importance scale
357:project's importance scale
337:Computer Security articles
1498:15:27, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
1446:22:05, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
1431:21:47, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
1363:07:51, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1119:06:21, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
852:Google Marketing Platform
681:WikiProject Google To-do:
676:
663:
612:
570:
548:
489:
387:
372:
350:
299:
272:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1564:the citation in question
1519:Free reCAPTCHA animation
906:Get more members using :
1670:B-Class Google articles
1615:05:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
814:List of Google products
1655:All Computing articles
810:Google mobile services
571:This article has been
567:
517:information technology
407:
369:
254:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
1074:instead. Not cool.
831:Category:Google stubs
566:
504:WikiProject Computing
406:
376:WikiProject Computing
368:
258:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
100:Neutral point of view
765:using the project's
757:All articles in the
431:Tag related articles
392:Things you can help
105:No original research
1505:Martin of Sheffield
894:good article status
573:automatically rated
419:More information...
850:. Update logos of
627:WikiProject Google
568:
535:Computing articles
408:
370:
260:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
1484:
1472:comment added by
1315:
1298:comment added by
1059:
1047:comment added by
1004:Google Streetview
1001:
1000:
982:
981:
952:
951:
948:
947:
944:
943:
940:
939:
936:
935:
901:Outline of Google
591:
590:
587:
586:
461:
460:
457:
456:
453:
452:
328:Computer Security
319:computer security
285:Computer Security
240:
239:
212:
211:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1687:
1605:202.162.236.206
1581:Missing citation
1314:
1292:
1284:
996:
973:
972:
962:
954:
917:
880:
797:This WikiProject
767:assessment scale
729:Article requests
718:
711:
710:
678:
652:
651:
648:
645:
642:
621:
614:
613:
608:
600:
593:
582:
537:
536:
533:
530:
527:
498:
491:
490:
485:
484:
483:
478:
470:
463:
436:Article requests
421:
389:
339:
338:
335:
332:
329:
308:
301:
300:
295:
292:
281:
274:
257:
251:
250:
242:
221:
214:
206:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1695:
1694:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1686:
1685:
1684:
1620:
1619:
1607:201.162.236.206
1583:
1548:
1521:
1414:
1386:
1293:
1275:
1198:
1153:
1123:What about the
1065:
1006:
997:
991:
967:
932:
929:
915:
866:
784:Google Talkback
780:Google Mapathon
709:
650:Google articles
649:
646:
643:
640:
639:
606:
534:
531:
528:
525:
524:
479:
476:
422:
417:
336:
333:
330:
327:
326:
293:
287:
255:
208:
207:
202:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1693:
1691:
1683:
1682:
1677:
1672:
1667:
1662:
1657:
1652:
1647:
1642:
1637:
1632:
1622:
1621:
1618:
1617:
1582:
1579:
1568:DesertPipeline
1547:
1544:
1520:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1474:176.116.143.11
1449:
1448:
1413:
1410:
1399:217.109.123.82
1385:
1382:
1366:
1365:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1327:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1280:comment added
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1259:
1254:
1249:
1238:
1237:
1197:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1180:188.56.197.163
1152:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1129:
1103:
1102:
1064:
1061:
1039:
1038:
1005:
1002:
999:
998:
993:
989:
987:
984:
983:
980:
979:
969:
968:
963:
957:
950:
949:
946:
945:
942:
941:
938:
937:
934:
933:
931:
930:
928:
927:
923:
922:
921:
920:
919:
918:
908:
907:
904:
896:
892:article for a
884:
881:
863:
855:
833:
816:
799:
786:
769:
747:
722:
720:
719:
708:
707:
702:
697:
692:
686:
683:
682:
674:
673:
666:Low-importance
662:
656:
655:
653:
636:the discussion
622:
610:
609:
607:Low‑importance
601:
589:
588:
585:
584:
569:
559:
558:
551:Mid-importance
547:
541:
540:
538:
521:the discussion
499:
487:
486:
477:Mid‑importance
471:
459:
458:
455:
454:
451:
450:
449:
448:
445:
442:
439:
432:
429:
426:
410:Article alerts
401:
398:
397:
385:
384:
381:Mid-importance
371:
361:
360:
353:Mid-importance
349:
343:
342:
340:
323:the discussion
309:
297:
296:
294:Mid‑importance
282:
270:
269:
263:
252:
238:
237:
230:the discussion
222:
210:
209:
200:
198:
197:
194:
193:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1692:
1681:
1678:
1676:
1673:
1671:
1668:
1666:
1663:
1661:
1658:
1656:
1653:
1651:
1648:
1646:
1643:
1641:
1638:
1636:
1633:
1631:
1628:
1627:
1625:
1616:
1612:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1593:
1589:
1580:
1578:
1577:
1573:
1569:
1565:
1560:
1557:
1554:
1551:
1545:
1543:
1542:
1538:
1534:
1530:
1526:
1523:The video at
1518:
1514:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1485:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1471:
1463:
1462:
1458:
1454:
1447:
1443:
1439:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1420:
1409:
1408:
1404:
1400:
1395:
1392:
1383:
1381:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1347:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1328:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1283:
1279:
1273:
1269:
1260:
1258:
1255:
1253:
1250:
1246:
1245:User:McGeddon
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1204:
1201:
1196:Wrong example
1195:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1158:
1150:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1133:Thenewright22
1130:
1126:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1071:
1070:
1062:
1060:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1028:84.159.190.96
1025:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1003:
986:
985:
978:
975:
974:
971:
970:
966:
961:
956:
955:
925:
924:
914:
913:
912:
911:
910:
909:
905:
903:
902:
897:
895:
891:
890:
885:
882:
879:
877:
876:
871:
865:
864:
862:
860:
856:
853:
849:
845:
842:
840:
839:
834:
832:
828:
825:
823:
822:
817:
815:
811:
808:
806:
805:
800:
798:
795:
793:
792:
787:
785:
781:
778:
776:
775:
770:
768:
764:
760:
756:
754:
753:
748:
745:
741:
737:
734:Articles for
733:
731:
730:
725:
724:
721:
717:
713:
712:
706:
703:
701:
698:
696:
693:
691:
688:
687:
685:
684:
680:
679:
675:
671:
667:
661:
658:
657:
654:
637:
633:
629:
628:
623:
620:
616:
615:
611:
605:
602:
599:
595:
578:
574:
565:
561:
560:
556:
552:
546:
543:
542:
539:
522:
518:
514:
510:
506:
505:
500:
497:
493:
492:
488:
475:
472:
469:
465:
446:
443:
440:
437:
433:
430:
427:
424:
423:
420:
415:
411:
405:
400:
399:
395:
391:
390:
386:
382:
379:(assessed as
378:
377:
367:
363:
362:
358:
354:
348:
345:
344:
341:
324:
320:
316:
315:
310:
307:
303:
302:
298:
291:
286:
283:
280:
276:
271:
267:
261:
253:
249:
244:
243:
235:
231:
227:
223:
220:
216:
215:
196:
195:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1584:
1561:
1558:
1555:
1552:
1549:
1522:
1486:
1468:— Preceding
1464:
1450:
1423:75.63.209.97
1418:
1415:
1396:
1387:
1367:
1294:— Preceding
1276:— Preceding
1266:
1205:
1202:
1199:
1163:192.38.5.154
1161:
1154:
1072:
1066:
1049:71.90.182.62
1043:— Preceding
1040:
1010:87.153.135.6
1007:
964:
899:
898:Improve the
887:
874:
873:
869:
858:
857:
836:
835:
819:
818:
802:
801:
789:
788:
772:
771:
750:
749:
735:
727:
726:
665:
625:
550:
502:
409:
374:
352:
312:
266:WikiProjects
233:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1131:Sincerely,
148:free images
31:not a forum
1624:Categories
1603:TNTgamer71
1588:TNTgamer71
583:parameter.
1533:11icewing
1111:MarkGyver
977:Archive 1
886:Help the
868:Add more
526:Computing
513:computing
509:computers
474:Computing
414:AAlertBot
290:Computing
88:if needed
71:Be polite
25:ReCAPTCHA
21:talk page
1470:unsigned
1438:JezGrove
1355:MichielN
1332:McGeddon
1308:contribs
1296:unsigned
1227:McGeddon
1092:JimScott
1045:unsigned
965:Archives
872:to this
854:products
791:Maintain
226:deletion
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1371:Teo8976
1300:Teo8976
1278:undated
1268:Teo8976
1207:Teo8976
1125:CAPTCHA
1076:Zctyp18
883:create:
695:history
668:on the
553:on the
355:on the
256:B-class
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
1419:at all
889:Google
838:Update
774:Expand
752:Assess
641:Google
632:Google
604:Google
581:|auto=
515:, and
262:scale.
126:Google
1490:Mhkay
1453:Dagme
875:to do
870:stuff
859:Other
821:Stubs
812:into
804:Merge
705:purge
700:watch
575:by a
396:with:
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1611:talk
1592:talk
1572:talk
1556:To:
1537:talk
1509:talk
1494:talk
1478:talk
1457:talk
1442:talk
1427:talk
1403:talk
1375:talk
1359:talk
1336:talk
1304:talk
1272:talk
1231:talk
1211:talk
1184:talk
1167:talk
1137:talk
1115:talk
1096:talk
1080:talk
1053:talk
1032:talk
1014:talk
846:and
829:and
761:and
744:here
742:and
740:here
736:most
690:edit
234:keep
232:was
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1274:)
660:Low
577:bot
545:Mid
347:Mid
176:TWL
1626::
1613:)
1594:)
1574:)
1539:)
1511:)
1496:)
1480:)
1459:)
1444:)
1429:)
1405:)
1377:)
1361:)
1338:)
1330:--
1310:)
1306:•
1243:@
1233:)
1213:)
1186:)
1169:)
1139:)
1117:)
1098:)
1082:)
1055:)
1034:)
1016:)
782:,
511:,
383:).
288::
156:)
54:;
1609:(
1601:@
1590:(
1570:(
1535:(
1507:(
1492:(
1476:(
1455:(
1440:(
1425:(
1401:(
1373:(
1357:(
1334:(
1302:(
1270:(
1229:(
1209:(
1182:(
1165:(
1135:(
1113:(
1094:(
1078:(
1051:(
1030:(
1012:(
861::
841::
824::
807::
794::
777::
755::
746:.
732::
672:.
557:.
438:)
359:.
268::
236:.
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
