281:
272:
464:
450:
419:
395:
366:
356:
244:
230:
216:
487:
145:
131:
260:
371:
It seems focused mostly on pre 1948. Washington Park has history 1948 to now. The 60s produced notable activists and leaders through churches and TWO (which is where I had contact). Maybe the title could have added "the Early Years" or similar to accurately describe the scope of the article. I'd
150:
The prose needs a good copyedit... I made a few changes, but quite a bit of it is just kind of unclear or the sentence structure is awkward. I'd recommend either going through it line-by-line or making a request at
287:
both rely heavily on it. I have dozens of GAs that rely on it. It has never even been questioned before. Instead of having a few authors and editors each article is compiled by the specialist on that
66:
62:
320:
Okay; sounds good. I just hadn't heard of it before and it had "Encyclopedia" in the name, so I just wondered about reliability. Anyway, consider this resolved. :) -
47:
39:
492:
I'm putting this review on hold for seven days for copyediting. Overall, I found the article to be nicely written and comprehensive, with good sourcing.
91:
85:
442:
298:
168:
236:
302:
172:
55:
17:
110:
137:
32:
202:
280:
271:
495:
I'm passing this now; the copyedit resolved most of my concerns. Good work, and I hope all goes well on the
294:
164:
284:
256:, and generally discouraged. If you can find better citations for those points, that would be great.
306:
176:
432:
504:
325:
104:
508:
329:
315:
289:
185:
159:
381:
310:
250:
180:
152:
456:
496:
253:
222:
275:
500:
321:
100:
269:
The
Encyclopedia of Chicago is an extremely well-accepted source here on WP.
372:
love to see a follow on article that describes it when I've known it.
74:
43:
8:
441:(images are tagged and non-free images have
249:I'm concerned about the reliability of
252:. It looks like an encyclopedia... a
7:
486:
436:, where possible and appropriate.
144:
130:
24:
485:
462:
448:
417:
393:
390:Fair representation without bias
364:
354:
279:
270:
258:
242:
228:
214:
143:
129:
18:Talk:Washington Park Subdivision
1:
509:03:44, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
330:03:06, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
316:03:02, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
186:03:35, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
463:
449:
418:
394:
365:
355:
243:
229:
215:
531:
97:
158:I just did a once over.--
119:reasonably well written
455:(appropriate use with
430:It is illustrated by
382:neutral point of view
344:broad in its coverage
285:South Side (Chicago)
443:fair use rationales
198:factually accurate
99:Initial review by
457:suitable captions
414:No edit wars etc.
314:
184:
522:
489:
488:
466:
465:
452:
451:
421:
420:
397:
396:
368:
367:
358:
357:
292:
283:
274:
266:
262:
261:
246:
245:
232:
231:
223:reliable sources
218:
217:
162:
147:
146:
133:
132:
79:
70:
51:
530:
529:
525:
524:
523:
521:
520:
519:
379:It follows the
351:(major aspects)
259:
257:
254:tertiary source
60:
37:
31:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
528:
526:
518:
517:
516:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
333:
332:
276:Prairie Avenue
221:(citations to
194:
193:
192:
191:
190:
189:
188:
96:
95:
80:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
527:
510:
506:
502:
498:
494:
493:
491:
490:
483:
480:
479:
477:
474:
468:
467:
460:
458:
446:
444:
438:
437:
435:
434:
429:
423:
422:
415:
412:
411:
409:
405:
399:
398:
391:
388:
387:
385:
383:
378:
370:
369:
362:
352:
348:
347:
345:
341:
331:
327:
323:
319:
318:
317:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
291:
286:
282:
277:
273:
268:
267:
265:
255:
251:
248:
247:
240:
238:
226:
224:
212:
208:
207:
205:
204:
199:
195:
187:
182:
178:
174:
170:
166:
161:
157:
156:
154:
149:
148:
141:
139:
127:
123:
122:
120:
116:
115:
114:
112:
109:
106:
102:
94:for criteria)
93:
89:
87:
83:
82:
81:
78:
77:
73:
68:
64:
59:
58:
54:
49:
45:
41:
36:
35:
26:
19:
481:
475:
454:
440:
431:
413:
407:
389:
380:
360:
350:
343:
290:TonyTheTiger
263:
234:
220:
211:(references)
210:
201:
197:
160:TonyTheTiger
135:
125:
118:
107:
98:
84:
75:
71:
57:Article talk
56:
52:
33:
30:
44:visual edit
497:Good topic
307:WP:CHICAGO
203:verifiable
177:WP:CHICAGO
482:Pass/Fail
361:(focused)
27:GA Review
501:Drilnoth
322:Drilnoth
288:topic.--
111:contribs
101:Drilnoth
476:Overall
311:WP:LOTM
181:WP:LOTM
153:WP:GOCE
126:(prose)
67:history
48:history
34:Article
433:images
408:stable
406:It is
384:policy
342:It is
196:It is
117:It is
88:review
90:(see
76:Watch
16:<
505:talk
326:talk
278:and
264:Done
200:and
105:talk
92:here
63:edit
40:edit
499:! -
303:bio
173:bio
138:MoS
507:)
484::
478::
461::
453:b
447::
439:a
416::
410:.
392::
386:.
363::
359:b
353::
349:a
346:.
328:)
313:)
241::
237:OR
233:c
227::
219:b
213::
209:a
206:.
183:)
155:.
142::
134:b
128::
124:a
121:.
113:)
86:GA
65:|
46:|
42:|
503:(
459:)
445:)
324:(
309:/
305:/
301:/
299:c
297:/
295:t
293:(
239:)
235:(
225:)
179:/
175:/
171:/
169:c
167:/
165:t
163:(
140:)
136:(
108:·
103:(
72:·
69:)
61:(
53:·
50:)
38:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
