Knowledge (XXG)

Universal neonatal hearing screening

Source 📝

89:
devices that amplify sound to devices that replace the function of a damaged inner ear to communication modalities including spoken language, sign language, and cued speech. The choice of interventions depends on the degree and the cause of hearing loss, accessibility, affordability and family choice. For interventions to be effective, they should be appropriate, timely, family-centered and undertaken through a coordinated interdisciplinary approach, which includes access to specialists who have the professional qualifications and specialized knowledge and skills to support and promote optimal development outcomes. Key elements for ensuring the best outcomes for children with hearing loss may include:
289:) and included the recommendation for BOA or physiologic screening of high-risk infants. At that time, the Committee did not recommend any specific device, although many programme were successfully utilizing automated ABR for newborn screening. Despite efforts and endorsements, the growth of high-risk screening in the United States was very slow. In 1984, high-risk hearing registries only included an estimated 15 percent of the nation's newborn population and likely, that less than half of those infants had their hearing assessed. Other weaknesses identified that a restricted risk register will excludes approximately 50 percent of infants with hearing impairment. 71:(ABR) testing) to screen the hearing of all newborns in a particular target region, regardless of the presence or absence of risk factors. Even among developed countries, until the 1990s, it could take years for hearing-impaired child to be diagnosed and to benefit from a health intervention and amplification. This delay still can happen in developing countries. If children are not exposed to sounds and language during their first years of life because of a hearing loss, they will have difficulty in developing spoken or signed language; cognitive development and social skills could also be affected. This 153:
loss of more than 40 decibels through review of health or education records, or both. Other international studies using different methods or criteria have reported higher estimates. In the United States, studies have shown a wide range of estimates for the number of children with hearing loss depending upon the reported age range, type, degree, frequency, laterality and method of ascertainment (e.g. audiometric testing, parental report, record review). Audiometric data of adolescents aged 12 to 19 years obtained through the
241:
the final or most recent screening were lost-to-follow-up/lost to documentation (LFU/LTD). Some of those infants may have received audiologic evaluations, but the results not reported to the EHDI programme (i.e., undocumented evaluation). By 2007, LFU/LTD among infants not passing the final or most recent screening had decreased to approximately 46% and to 35% in 2011. The LFU/LTD percent for diagnosis in 2016 was 25.4% (n = 16,522). The 2016 LFU/LTD percent for enrollment in early intervention was 19.6% (n = 1,239).
307:(R-NY) sponsored and introduced the first attempt at federal legislation with the Hearing Loss Testing Act of 1991 requiring the hearing testing of every child born in the United States at the time of birth and establishing uniform standards for such testing. Although the Committee on Energy and Commerce referred this legislation to subcommittee, Congressman Walsh continued to promote legislation throughout that decade as the co-founder and co-chair of the 29: 63:) programmes, refer to those services aimed at screening hearing of all newborns, regardless of the presence of a risk factor for hearing loss. UNHS is the first step in the EHDI program which indicates whether a newborn requires further audiological assessment to determine the presence or absence of permanent hearing loss. Newborn hearing screening uses objective testing methods (usually 194:(AABR). Children passing the test receive no further assessment. Children who fail the initial screen are usually referred for a second screening assessment either with OAE's or AABR. Children failing this second assessment will usually be sent for diagnostic assessment of their hearing. There is some variation in procedure by region and country but most follow this basic principle. 223:) screened less than 3% of all newborns for hearing loss in the U.S. at the beginning of the 1990s. Data from states and territories for the early years of EHDI (1999–2004) were collected using surveys conducted by the Directors of Speech and Hearing Programs in State Health and Welfare Agencies and shared with the CDC EHDI Program. Beginning in 2005, CDC obtained data through an 351:
included in their Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP). With growing research evidence, in 2007 United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended screening of hearing loss in all newborn infants with an assigned B grade. By 2010, 43 states enacted legislative statutes or written regulatory language related to universal newborn hearing screening.
343:, to establish "statewide newborn and infant hearing screening evaluation and intervention programs and systems." Congress provided HRSA with the authority to support statewide services and the CDC with the authority to provide technical assistance for data management and applied research. In addition, the 244:
Challenges to newborn hearing screening have existed for over three decades. Newborn screening alone can miss postnatal, progressive or acquired hearing loss, there is poor identification of perinatal infections, and concerns over regulatory barriers and privacy continue to this day. Many infants are
236:
In addition to meeting the "1-3-6" targets, one of the key challenges for newborn hearing screening programmes is to reduce 'loss to follow-up' (where a child does not return for the next stage of the process). The Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (US) has reported that this is a significant problem
152:
can be detected. Congenital hearing loss can be due to genetic causes, environmental exposures during pregnancy, or health complications shortly after birth. Population-based studies in Europe and North America have identified a consistent prevalence of approximately 0.1% of children having a hearing
350:
The year 2000 Position Statement of the JCIH provided the Principles and Guidelines for Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs. In 2006, the HHS Secretary's Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children (SACHDNC) included newborn hearing as one of the conditions to be
273:
In their 1971 Position Statement, the JCIH determined the results of screening programs were inconsistent and misleading and, although recognizing the urgent need for early detection, recommended discontinuing routine behavioral hearing screening of newborn infants. In 1973 the Committee recommended
253:
In 1956, Erik Wedenberg published one of the earliest articles describing examiner use of tuning forks, percussion sounds, pitch pipes, and cowbells to screen the hearing newborn infants. The author noted, "until recently it has not been considered possible to carry out reliable auditory tests until
269:
after presentation of narrow-band (90 dB) and white noise (93 dB) stimulation. In her 1964 publication, the observers identified suspected hearing losses, although disagreements were significant for 26% of the infants. In 1969, Marion led efforts for the formation of the Joint Committee
206:
Targeted neonatal hearing screening describes the process by which only a specific subset of a population are screened (for instance those infants in the neonatal intensive care unit or with risk factors for hearing loss). Although the U.S. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) endorsed the goal
147:
Hearing loss in neonates is the most common congenital birth defect and sensory disorder, and can be caused by a variety of reasons. Research has placed the prevalence of significant permanent hearing loss in neonates at 1–2 per 1000 live births in the United States. With this screening, many forms
88:
In order to be most effective in minimizing developmental delays and promoting communication, education and social development, timely and appropriate interventions need to follow the early identification of hearing loss. Interventions for children with permanent congenital hearing loss ranges from
359:
maintains the Newborn Screening Coding and Terminology Guide to promote and facilitate the use of electronic health data standards in recording and transmitting newborn screening test results. This includes EHDI standard vocabulary codes and terminologies, including Logical Observation Identifiers
240:
Now that over 95% of U.S. infants are having their hearing screened, remaining challenges include ensuring timely diagnostic evaluation for those who do not pass the screening and enrollment in early intervention for those with diagnosed hearing loss. In 2005, >60% of infants who had not passed
197:
Screening personnel vary also, in some regions Audiologists are used, whereas technicians, nurses, or volunteers are used in other programs. In countries that have insufficient financial and human resources to implement hearing screening, community-based programs have used simple, behaviour-based
397:
asked via questionnaire for the status of the hearing screening in 196 states worldwide; data from 158 states were obtained: in 64 states there is no or less screening (38% of the world's population); in 41 states (38% of the world's population) >85% of the babies are screened. The mean living
227:
approved survey sent to EHDI programme directors. In 1999, 22 jurisdictions estimated that less than half of all infants (46.5%) were screened for hearing loss, steadily increasing to 80.1% in 2005 85.4% in 2007, and 98.0% by 2009. The number of deaf and hard of hearing babies identified early in
133:
EHDI programmes exist in many countries, including the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, and the majority of countries making up the European Union. In order to maximize language and communication competence, literacy development, and psychosocial well-being, the U.S. Joint
79:
Newborn hearing screening has been implemented in many regions worldwide since the early 2000s as it aims to reduce the age of detection for hearing loss—meaning that diagnosed children can receive early intervention, which is more effective because the brain's ability to learn language (spoken,
138:
diagnosis no later than three months of age and 3) all infants identified as deaf or hard of hearing in one or both ears should be referred to early targeted and appropriate intervention services as soon as possible after diagnosis, but no later than six months of age. Newborn hearing screening
165:
Studies have found that early diagnosis and intervention for children with hearing loss can help them develop better communication skills. Researchers have shown children with hearing loss meeting the current early identification and intervention guidelines were more likely to have enhanced
354:
The electronic age of EHDI may have begun during the next decade. The Quality, Research, and Public Health (QRPH) Planning and Technical Committees of Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise published a series of EHDI technical documents. These profiles promote the automated collection and
215:
Universal newborn hearing screening programs aim to have high coverage rates (participation) and many aim to screen babies by one month of age, aim to complete the diagnostic process for referred babies by three months of age, and aim to begin intervention services by six months of age.
75:
separates children into two groups—those with a high index of suspicion (more likely to have permanent congenital hearing loss) and those with a low index of suspicion (less likely to have permanent congenital hearing loss). Those in the first group are referred for diagnostic testing.
319:
at Utah State University conducted the Rhode Island Hearing Assessment Project (RIHAP), which demonstrated the feasibility of using transient OAEs for universal screening. In 1994, both the JCIH and the DSHPSHWA endorsed universal newborn hearing screening. In 1996, the
296:, perhaps most remembered for his work related to abortion, tobacco, and AIDS, called for increased efforts to identify congenital hearing loss within the first year of life. In his words, "It's a tall order, yes, but if we all work together, I believe we can fill it." 173:
Investigators have reported on numerous topics including the screening and diagnostic evaluations of children with unilateral and mild bilateral hearing loss, the impact of hearing loss and comorbidities, and the long-term hearing loss risk of children born with
398:
standard in these states was 10 times higher than in countries without screening. It could show how useful a hearing screening can be: average age at diagnosis of hearing disorders was 4.6 months for screened children and 34.9 months for non-screened children.
380:
for hospital accreditation have endorsed and/or supported adoption of EHDI electronic quality measures. EHDI-PALS (Pediatric Audiology Links to Services) provides web-based link to information, resources, and services for children with hearing loss. In 2018,
134:
Committee on Infant Hearing endorses the goals that 1) all newborns should undergo hearing screening using physiologic measures prior to hospital discharge, but no later than one month of age 2) all infants whose do not pass screening should have appropriate
80:
cued, or signed) reduces as the child ages. Children born with permanent congenital hearing loss have historically performed worse educationally, had poorer language acquisition, social functioning and vocational choices than their hearing peers.
166:
vocabulary than children who did not meet EHDI 1-3-6 guidelines. Funded research projects have focused on improving EHDI process issues including improving LFU/LTD rates through at Women, Infants, and Children (
344: 274:
that only infants with certain high risk factors have their hearing evaluated (five factors: family history; congenital perinatal infections; ear, nose or throat defects; low birthweight <1500 g;
1635:
Gaffney M, Eichwald J, Gaffney C, Alam S (September 2014). "Early hearing detection and intervention among infants--hearing screening and follow-up survey, United States, 2005–2006 and 2009–2010".
207:
of universal detection of infants with hearing loss in 1994, it modified and maintained a role for specific high risk factors described in their previous (1973, 1982 and 1990) position statements.
170:) certification screening visits. and exploring technologies that can be incorporated in electrophysiological testing to facilitate hearing loss diagnosis in newborns, without the use of sedation. 332: 316: 2192:
Nelson HD, Bougatsos C, Nygren P (Jul 2008). "Universal newborn hearing screening: systematic review to update the 2001 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation".
104: 2478: 245:
lost to follow-up and many families face the challenge of navigating coordinated quality care through complex health to education systems involving multiple agencies.
154: 261:, affectionately referred to as the "mother of pediatric audiology", pioneered the first hospital based infant hearing screening programme in Denver, Colorado, using 592:
Johnson JS, Newport EL (June 1991). "Critical period effects on universal properties of language: the status of subjacency in the acquisition of a second language".
2157:
Vohr BR, Carty LM, Moore PE, Letourneau K (September 1998). "The Rhode Island Hearing Assessment Program: experience with statewide hearing screening (1993–1996)".
1926:
Shulman S, Besculides M, Saltzman A, Ireys H, White KR, Forsman I (August 2010). "Evaluation of the universal newborn hearing screening and intervention program".
237:
in state screening programmes in the United States and other jurisdictions. Measuring loss to follow-up is an important step in understanding and reducing it.
1797:
Houston KT, Behl DD, White KR, Forsman I (August 2010). "Federal privacy regulations and the provision of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention programs".
719:"Supplement to the JCIH 2007 Position Statement: Principles and Guidelines for Early Intervention After Confirmation That a Child Is Deaf or Hard of Hearing" 340: 324:
concluded that the evidence was insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms and assigned an "I Statement" grade for newborn hearing screening.
373: 336: 355:
communication exchange of EHDI data between clinical and public health information systems (results, demographics, care plans, quality measures). The
315:
Consensus statement initiated the concept of "1-3-6" as the monthly milestones for screening, diagnosis and intervention. Between 1993 and 1996, the
637:"From Screening to Early Identification and Intervention: Discovering Predictors to Successful Outcomes for Children With Significant Hearing Loss" 2285:
White KR, Forsman I, Eichwald J, Munoz K (April 2010). "The evolution of early hearing detection and intervention programs in the United States".
1883:
Russ SA, Hanna D, DesGeorges J, Forsman I (August 2010). "Improving follow-up to newborn hearing screening: a learning-collaborative experience".
1252:
Seeliger EL, Martin RA, Gromoske AN, Harris, AB (2016). "WIC Participation as a Risk Factor for Loss to Follow-Up in the Wisconsin EHDI System".
992:
Thompson DC, McPhillips H, Davis RL, Lieu TL, Homer CJ, Helfand M (24 October 2001). "Universal newborn hearing screening: summary of evidence".
1279:
Cone B, Norrix L (2015). "Measuring the Advantage of Kalman-Weighted Averaging for Auditory Brainstem Response Hearing Evaluation in Infants".
327:
All US states participate in Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) programmes. The birth of EHDI may be attributed to passage of the
347:
at NIH provided the authority to continue a programme of research and development on the efficacy of new screening techniques and technology.
365: 157:
identified 3% to 5% of adolescents with hearing loss of 25 decibels or more and 15% to 20% with hearing losses of greater than 15 decibels.
1840:
Russ SA, Dougherty D, Jagadish P (August 2010). "Accelerating evidence into practice for the benefit of children with early hearing loss".
508:
Downs MP, Yoshinaga-Itano C (February 1999). "The efficacy of early identification and intervention for children with hearing impairment".
228:
life in the U.S. has steadily increased from 855 in the year 2000, 2,634 in 2005 and most recently reported 6,337 in calendar year 2016.
717:
Muse C, Harrison J, Yoshinaga-Itano C, Grimes A, Brookhouser PE, Epstein S, Buchman C, Mehl A, Vohr B, Moeller MP, Martin P (Apr 2013).
308: 2122:
Maxon AB, White KR, Vohr BR, Behrens TR (April 1993). "Using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions for neonatal hearing screening".
834: 782: 693: 356: 321: 262: 1504: 1412:
Lanzieri TM, Leung J, Caviness AC, Chung W, Flores M, Blum P, Bialek SR, Miller JA, Vinson SS, Turcich MR, Voigt RG (April 2017).
970: 270:
on Infant Hearing (JCIH) to provide multi-disciplinary leadership and guidance in all areas of newborn and infant hearing issues.
220: 2320: 224: 139:
employs objective assessment methods, either with automated (ABR) or (OAE), or both for initial and/or rescreening procedures.
1088: 676:
Neville H, Bavelier D (2002). "Human brain plasticity: evidence from sensory deprivation and altered language experience".
2541: 312: 2525: 900:"Organisation of newborn hearing screening programmes in the European Union: widely implemented, differently performed" 2028:
Mahoney TM, Eichwald JG (May 1987). "The ups and "downs" of high-risk hearing screening: The Utah statewide program".
191: 68: 1662: 258: 2368: 385:(HL7) approved the Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) Implementation Guide as a Normative Standard. 880: 1681:"Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs" 1532: 2546: 328: 149: 111: 186:
Often a two-stage process occurs in the actual screening of the hearing. Children are screened with either
2409: 1001: 369: 126: 2531: 2410:"HL7 Version 2.6 Implementation Guide: Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) Results Release 1" 1316:"Hearing Screening and Diagnostic Evaluation of Children With Unilateral and Mild Bilateral Hearing Loss" 898:
Levêque, Alain; Tognola, Gabriella; Lagasse, Raphaël; Senterre, Christelle; Vos, Bénédicte (2016-06-01).
2472: 2098: 2567: 282: 187: 72: 64: 1006: 2537: 461: 2572: 2454: 2217: 1951: 1908: 1865: 1822: 1708: 1486: 1136: 748: 617: 574: 275: 1365:"Impact of Co-Occurring Birth Defects on the Timing of Newborn Hearing Screening and Diagnosis" 1064: 2506: 2390:"Early Hearing Detection & Intervention Pediatric Audiology Links to Services (EHDI-PALS)" 2302: 2209: 2174: 2139: 2064: 1986: 1943: 1900: 1857: 1814: 1757: 1700: 1644: 1614: 1478: 1443: 1394: 1345: 1296: 1234: 1185: 1128: 1046: 1019: 929: 921: 778: 740: 699: 689: 658: 609: 566: 525: 443: 331:
which included language from Walsh's proposed legislation and authorized the Secretary of the
266: 2562: 2446: 2294: 2235: 2201: 2166: 2131: 2037: 1978: 1935: 1892: 1849: 1806: 1747: 1739: 1692: 1576: 1470: 1433: 1425: 1384: 1376: 1335: 1327: 1288: 1261: 1224: 1216: 1175: 1167: 1118: 1011: 911: 798: 770: 730: 681: 648: 601: 556: 517: 433: 377: 98: 899: 2526:
Resources on Newborn Hearing Screening by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
1680: 1380: 1363:
Chapman DA, Stampfel CC, Bodurtha JN, Dodson KM, Pandya A, Lynch KB, Kirby RS (Dec 2011).
293: 175: 28: 1602: 303:, prolonged mechanical ventilation, syndromic stigmata) for a total of ten. Congressman 1505:"Newborn and infant hearing screening: Current issues and guiding principles for action" 1752: 1727: 1438: 1413: 1389: 1364: 1340: 1315: 1229: 1204: 1180: 1155: 438: 421: 382: 304: 2170: 685: 521: 2556: 2458: 1203:
Hunter LL, Meinzen-Derr J, Wiley S, Horvath CL, Kothari R, Wexelblatt S (July 2016).
605: 122: 2221: 1912: 1869: 1826: 1712: 1490: 1414:"Long-term outcomes of children with symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus disease" 1140: 621: 2434: 2099:"Actions – H.R.2089 – 102nd Congress (1991–1992): Hearing Loss Testing Act of 1991" 1955: 752: 578: 286: 2298: 1679:
American Academy Of Pediatrics, Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (October 2007).
2082:
Northern JL, Downs MP (2002). "Chapter 1: Hearing and Hearing Loss in Children".
1743: 1728:"Improved newborn hearing screening follow-up results in more infants identified" 1205:"Influence of the WIC Program on Loss to Follow-up for Newborn Hearing Screening" 1779: 1691:(4). American Academy Of Pediatrics Joint Committee on Infant Hearing: 898–921. 300: 167: 115: 94: 1557:"Directors of Speech and Hearing Programs in State Health and Welfare Agencies" 422:"Newborn hearing screening in developing countries: needs & new directions" 198:
questionnaires to identify infants with hearing loss but with limited success.
2135: 1982: 860: 486: 2344: 1331: 1292: 1015: 925: 2055:"Early identification of hearing impairment in infants and young children". 1939: 1896: 1853: 1810: 916: 653: 636: 135: 2510: 2306: 2213: 2205: 2041: 1990: 1947: 1904: 1861: 1818: 1761: 1704: 1696: 1648: 1618: 1447: 1398: 1349: 1300: 1238: 1220: 1189: 1171: 1132: 1123: 1106: 1050: 1023: 933: 744: 735: 718: 703: 662: 570: 529: 447: 2178: 2143: 2068: 1482: 1474: 1314:
Ross DS, Holstrum WJ, Gaffney M, Green D, Oyler RF, Gravel JS (Mar 2008).
613: 774: 2450: 2435:"A Survey on the Global Status of Newborn and Infant Hearing Screening" 2433:
Katrin Neumann, Harald A. Euler, Shelley Chadha, Karl R. White (2020).
1429: 1156:"Early Hearing Detection and Vocabulary of Children With Hearing Loss" 1265: 561: 544: 42:
early intervention/identification of deaf or hard-of-hearing infants
2004: 816: 1603:"Identifying infants with hearing loss – United States, 1999–2007" 361: 16:
Policy of routinely testing the hearing of babies soon after birth
2369:"Electronic Clinical Quality Measure (eCQM) Standards Landscape" 1556: 1089:"Published Literature on Prevalence of Hearing Loss in Children" 1037:
Wrightson AS (May 2007). "Universal newborn hearing screening".
345:
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
265:(BOA). Several independent observers recorded eye-blink and/or 395:
International Newborn and Infant Hearing Screening (NIHS) Group
2497:"European Consensus Statement on Neonatal Hearing Screening". 2260: 1780:"Identification audiometry for neonates: a preliminary report" 680:. Progress in Brain Research. Vol. 138. pp. 177–88. 1461:"Joint Committee on Infant Hearing 1994 position statement". 2389: 1668:. U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. May 2018. 1601:
Centers for Disease Control Prevention (CDC) (March 2010).
2547:
European Consensus Statement on Neonatal Hearing Screening
767:
Childhood hearing loss: strategies for prevention and care
2376:
HE Quality, Research and Public Health (QRPH) White Paper
1969:
Wedenberg E (1956). "Auditory tests on newborn infants".
678:
Plasticity in the Adult Brain: From Genes to Neurotherapy
155:
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)
2265:
American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
1621:– via U.S. Centers for Disease Control Prevention. 839:
Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care
2536:
Fact Sheet/ Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools,
2439:
The Journal of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention
1154:
Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey AL, Wiggin M, Chung W (2017).
950: 973:. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) 317:
National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management
1537:
U.S. Health Resources & Services Administration
1254:
Journal of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention
835:"National Framework for Neonatal Hearing Screening" 817:"NHS Newborn Hearing Screening Programme Home Page" 38: 21: 1094:. U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 861:"Australasian Newborn Hearing Screening Committee" 487:"Principles and practice of screening for disease" 1065:"Hearing Loss at Birth (Congenital Hearing Loss)" 299:In 1990, the JCIH added three more risk factors ( 281:In 1982, two additional risk factors were added ( 2345:"Newborn Screening Coding and Terminology Guide" 1732:Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 545:"Linguistic ability and early language exposure" 121:development of nonverbal communication, such as 2086:. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. 4. 1630: 1628: 1581:U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 881:"Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programme" 803:U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 33:A newborn infant undergoes a hearing screening. 254:the child has attained the age of 6–7 years." 8: 2477:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( 2261:"Early Hearing Detection & Intervention" 1069:American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 462:"NIH Fact Sheets: Newborn Hearing Screening" 374:Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 341:Health Resources and Services Administration 110:therapy to develop spoken language, such as 107:, such as FM/radio systems and loop systems; 2378:. IHE International, Inc. 6 February 2018. 2240:Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1107:"Trends in hearing loss among adolescents" 641:Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 337:Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 27: 1751: 1437: 1388: 1339: 1228: 1179: 1122: 1005: 915: 734: 652: 560: 543:Mayberry RI, Lock E, Kazmi H (May 2002). 437: 219:U.S. jurisdictional programs (states and 1663:"Summary of 2016 National CDC EHDI Data" 57:early hearing detection and intervention 2532:Newborn Hearing Screening by the UK NHS 2236:"Information About EHDI State Programs" 1577:"Information About EHDI State Programs" 407: 333:Department of Health and Human Services 2470: 1726:Alam S, Gaffney M, Eichwald J (2014). 426:The Indian Journal of Medical Research 18: 1773: 1771: 1607:Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 1533:"Recommended Uniform Screening Panel" 1527: 1525: 945: 943: 366:Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine 7: 415: 413: 411: 49:Universal neonatal hearing screening 22:Universal neonatal hearing screening 2005:"Joint Committee on Infant Hearing" 951:"Joint Committee on Infant Hearing" 885:New Zealand National Screening Unit 769:. World Health Organization. 2016. 368:— Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT). The 309:Congressional Hearing Health Caucus 510:Pediatric Clinics of North America 466:U.S. National Institutes of Health 14: 2349:U.S. National Library of Medicine 904:European Journal of Public Health 357:U.S. National Library of Medicine 322:US Preventive Services Task Force 285:and birth asphyxia including low 263:Behavioral Observation Audiometry 143:Rates of congenital hearing loss 1381:10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0049) 225:Office of Management and Budget 2097:Walsh, James T. (1991-05-06). 1778:Downs MP, Sterritt GM (1964). 485:Wilson JMG; Jungner G (1968). 1: 2542:National Institutes of Health 2299:10.1053/j.semperi.2009.12.009 2171:10.1016/S0022-3476(98)70268-9 1281:American Journal of Audiology 1105:Barrett TS, White KR (2017). 686:10.1016/S0079-6123(02)38078-6 522:10.1016/S0031-3955(05)70082-1 329:Children's Health Act of 2000 313:National Institutes of Health 2124:British Journal of Audiology 1784:Journal of Auditory Research 1744:10.1097/PHH.0b013e31829d7b57 606:10.1016/0010-0277(91)90054-8 105:hearing assistive technology 1510:. World Health Organization 971:"Newborn Hearing Screening" 489:. World Health Organization 192:auditory brainstem response 69:auditory brainstem response 67:(OAE) testing or automated 2589: 821:UK National Health Service 635:Yoshinaga-Itano C (2003). 202:Targeted hearing screening 118:and auditory-oral therapy; 2538:Newborn Hearing Screening 2159:The Journal of Pediatrics 2136:10.3109/03005369309077906 1983:10.3109/00016485609120155 1039:American Family Physician 93:hearing devices, such as 26: 2287:Seminars in Perinatology 1332:10.1177/1084713807306241 1293:10.1044/2015_AJA-14-0021 1016:10.1001/jama.286.16.2000 292:In 1989 Surgeon General 2057:NIH Consensus Statement 1940:10.1542/peds.2010-0354F 1897:10.1542/peds.2010-0354K 1854:10.1542/peds.2010-0354E 1811:10.1542/peds.2010-0354G 1418:Journal of Perinatology 150:congenital hearing loss 112:auditory-verbal therapy 2206:10.1542/peds.2007-1422 2042:10.1055/s-0028-1091366 1971:Acta Oto-Laryngologica 1697:10.1542/peds.2007-2333 1469:(1): 152–6. Jan 1995. 1221:10.1542/peds.2015-4301 1172:10.1542/peds.2016-2964 1124:10.1542/peds.2017-0619 736:10.1542/peds.2013-0008 370:National Quality Forum 127:American Sign Language 1475:10.1542/peds.95.1.152 917:10.1093/eurpub/ckw020 654:10.1093/deafed/8.1.11 335:, acting through the 188:otoacoustic emissions 182:Screening methodology 420:McPherson B (2012). 393:In 2014 to 2019 the 283:bacterial meningitis 97:, and middle ear or 65:otoacoustic emission 55:), which is part of 2084:Hearing in children 2030:Seminars in Hearing 1934:(Suppl 1): S19–27. 1891:(Suppl 1): S59–69. 1805:(Suppl 1): S28–33. 389:Situation worldwide 301:ototoxic medication 190:(OAE) or automated 2451:10.26077/a221-cc28 1848:(Suppl 1): S7–18. 1430:10.1038/jp.2017.41 729:(4): e1324–e1349. 276:hyperbilirubinemia 2414:HL7 International 2325:IHE International 2063:(1): 1–24. 1993. 360:Names and Codes ( 267:startle responses 99:cochlear implants 46: 45: 2580: 2514: 2505:(2): 119. 1999. 2483: 2482: 2476: 2468: 2466: 2465: 2430: 2424: 2423: 2421: 2420: 2406: 2400: 2399: 2397: 2396: 2386: 2380: 2379: 2373: 2365: 2359: 2358: 2356: 2355: 2341: 2335: 2334: 2332: 2331: 2317: 2311: 2310: 2282: 2276: 2275: 2273: 2272: 2257: 2251: 2250: 2248: 2247: 2232: 2226: 2225: 2200:(1): e266–e276. 2189: 2183: 2182: 2154: 2148: 2147: 2119: 2113: 2112: 2110: 2109: 2103:www.congress.gov 2094: 2088: 2087: 2079: 2073: 2072: 2052: 2046: 2045: 2025: 2019: 2018: 2016: 2014: 2009: 2001: 1995: 1994: 1966: 1960: 1959: 1923: 1917: 1916: 1880: 1874: 1873: 1837: 1831: 1830: 1794: 1788: 1787: 1775: 1766: 1765: 1755: 1723: 1717: 1716: 1676: 1670: 1669: 1667: 1659: 1653: 1652: 1637:MMWR Supplements 1632: 1623: 1622: 1598: 1592: 1591: 1589: 1588: 1573: 1567: 1566: 1564: 1563: 1553: 1547: 1546: 1544: 1543: 1529: 1520: 1519: 1517: 1515: 1509: 1501: 1495: 1494: 1458: 1452: 1451: 1441: 1409: 1403: 1402: 1392: 1360: 1354: 1353: 1343: 1311: 1305: 1304: 1276: 1270: 1269: 1249: 1243: 1242: 1232: 1215:(1): e20154301. 1200: 1194: 1193: 1183: 1166:(2): e20162964. 1151: 1145: 1144: 1126: 1117:(6): e20170619. 1102: 1096: 1095: 1093: 1085: 1079: 1078: 1076: 1075: 1061: 1055: 1054: 1034: 1028: 1027: 1009: 989: 983: 982: 980: 978: 967: 961: 960: 958: 957: 947: 938: 937: 919: 895: 889: 888: 877: 871: 870: 868: 867: 857: 851: 850: 848: 846: 831: 825: 824: 813: 807: 806: 795: 789: 788: 763: 757: 756: 738: 714: 708: 707: 673: 667: 666: 656: 632: 626: 625: 589: 583: 582: 564: 540: 534: 533: 505: 499: 498: 496: 494: 482: 476: 475: 473: 472: 458: 452: 451: 441: 417: 378:Joint Commission 311:. In 1993, the 161:Research studies 31: 19: 2588: 2587: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2553: 2552: 2522: 2517: 2496: 2492: 2490:Further reading 2487: 2486: 2469: 2463: 2461: 2432: 2431: 2427: 2418: 2416: 2408: 2407: 2403: 2394: 2392: 2388: 2387: 2383: 2371: 2367: 2366: 2362: 2353: 2351: 2343: 2342: 2338: 2329: 2327: 2319: 2318: 2314: 2284: 2283: 2279: 2270: 2268: 2259: 2258: 2254: 2245: 2243: 2234: 2233: 2229: 2191: 2190: 2186: 2156: 2155: 2151: 2121: 2120: 2116: 2107: 2105: 2096: 2095: 2091: 2081: 2080: 2076: 2054: 2053: 2049: 2027: 2026: 2022: 2012: 2010: 2007: 2003: 2002: 1998: 1968: 1967: 1963: 1925: 1924: 1920: 1882: 1881: 1877: 1839: 1838: 1834: 1796: 1795: 1791: 1777: 1776: 1769: 1725: 1724: 1720: 1678: 1677: 1673: 1665: 1661: 1660: 1656: 1634: 1633: 1626: 1600: 1599: 1595: 1586: 1584: 1575: 1574: 1570: 1561: 1559: 1555: 1554: 1550: 1541: 1539: 1531: 1530: 1523: 1513: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1502: 1498: 1460: 1459: 1455: 1411: 1410: 1406: 1362: 1361: 1357: 1313: 1312: 1308: 1278: 1277: 1273: 1266:10.15142/T3KK5C 1251: 1250: 1246: 1202: 1201: 1197: 1153: 1152: 1148: 1104: 1103: 1099: 1091: 1087: 1086: 1082: 1073: 1071: 1063: 1062: 1058: 1036: 1035: 1031: 1007:10.1.1.599.9440 1000:(16): 2000–10. 991: 990: 986: 976: 974: 969: 968: 964: 955: 953: 949: 948: 941: 897: 896: 892: 879: 878: 874: 865: 863: 859: 858: 854: 844: 842: 833: 832: 828: 815: 814: 810: 799:"EHDI Programs" 797: 796: 792: 785: 765: 764: 760: 716: 715: 711: 696: 675: 674: 670: 634: 633: 629: 591: 590: 586: 562:10.1038/417038a 542: 541: 537: 507: 506: 502: 492: 490: 484: 483: 479: 470: 468: 460: 459: 455: 419: 418: 409: 404: 391: 294:C. Everett Koop 251: 234: 213: 204: 184: 176:cytomegalovirus 163: 145: 86: 34: 17: 12: 11: 5: 2586: 2584: 2576: 2575: 2570: 2565: 2555: 2554: 2551: 2550: 2544: 2534: 2528: 2521: 2520:External links 2518: 2516: 2515: 2493: 2491: 2488: 2485: 2484: 2425: 2401: 2381: 2360: 2336: 2312: 2277: 2252: 2227: 2184: 2149: 2114: 2089: 2074: 2047: 2036:(2): 155–163. 2020: 1996: 1961: 1918: 1875: 1832: 1789: 1767: 1718: 1671: 1654: 1624: 1593: 1568: 1548: 1521: 1496: 1453: 1424:(7): 875–880. 1404: 1375:(2): 132–139. 1355: 1306: 1287:(2): 153–168. 1271: 1244: 1195: 1146: 1097: 1080: 1056: 1045:(9): 1349–52. 1029: 984: 962: 939: 910:(3): 505–510. 890: 872: 852: 826: 808: 790: 783: 758: 709: 694: 668: 627: 584: 535: 500: 477: 453: 406: 405: 403: 400: 390: 387: 383:Health Level 7 305:James T. Walsh 250: 247: 233: 230: 212: 209: 203: 200: 183: 180: 162: 159: 144: 141: 131: 130: 119: 108: 102: 85: 82: 44: 43: 40: 36: 35: 32: 24: 23: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2585: 2574: 2571: 2569: 2566: 2564: 2561: 2560: 2558: 2548: 2545: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2533: 2530:Resources on 2529: 2527: 2524: 2523: 2519: 2512: 2508: 2504: 2500: 2495: 2494: 2489: 2480: 2474: 2460: 2456: 2452: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2436: 2429: 2426: 2415: 2411: 2405: 2402: 2391: 2385: 2382: 2377: 2370: 2364: 2361: 2350: 2346: 2340: 2337: 2326: 2322: 2316: 2313: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2281: 2278: 2266: 2262: 2256: 2253: 2241: 2237: 2231: 2228: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2195: 2188: 2185: 2180: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2153: 2150: 2145: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2130:(2): 149–53. 2129: 2125: 2118: 2115: 2104: 2100: 2093: 2090: 2085: 2078: 2075: 2070: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2051: 2048: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2031: 2024: 2021: 2006: 2000: 1997: 1992: 1988: 1984: 1980: 1977:(5): 446–61. 1976: 1972: 1965: 1962: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1933: 1929: 1922: 1919: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1879: 1876: 1871: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1836: 1833: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1812: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1793: 1790: 1785: 1781: 1774: 1772: 1768: 1763: 1759: 1754: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1722: 1719: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1675: 1672: 1664: 1658: 1655: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1631: 1629: 1625: 1620: 1616: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1597: 1594: 1582: 1578: 1572: 1569: 1558: 1552: 1549: 1538: 1534: 1528: 1526: 1522: 1506: 1500: 1497: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1457: 1454: 1449: 1445: 1440: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1408: 1405: 1400: 1396: 1391: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1359: 1356: 1351: 1347: 1342: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1320:Trends Amplif 1317: 1310: 1307: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1275: 1272: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1248: 1245: 1240: 1236: 1231: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1199: 1196: 1191: 1187: 1182: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1150: 1147: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1125: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1101: 1098: 1090: 1084: 1081: 1070: 1066: 1060: 1057: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1033: 1030: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1008: 1003: 999: 995: 988: 985: 972: 966: 963: 952: 946: 944: 940: 935: 931: 927: 923: 918: 913: 909: 905: 901: 894: 891: 886: 882: 876: 873: 862: 856: 853: 840: 836: 830: 827: 822: 818: 812: 809: 805:. 2017-11-14. 804: 800: 794: 791: 786: 784:9789241510325 780: 776: 772: 768: 762: 759: 754: 750: 746: 742: 737: 732: 728: 724: 720: 713: 710: 705: 701: 697: 695:9780444509819 691: 687: 683: 679: 672: 669: 664: 660: 655: 650: 646: 642: 638: 631: 628: 623: 619: 615: 611: 607: 603: 600:(3): 215–58. 599: 595: 588: 585: 580: 576: 572: 568: 563: 558: 554: 550: 546: 539: 536: 531: 527: 523: 519: 515: 511: 504: 501: 488: 481: 478: 467: 463: 457: 454: 449: 445: 440: 435: 431: 427: 423: 416: 414: 412: 408: 401: 399: 396: 388: 386: 384: 379: 375: 371: 367: 363: 358: 352: 348: 346: 342: 338: 334: 330: 325: 323: 318: 314: 310: 306: 302: 297: 295: 290: 288: 284: 279: 277: 271: 268: 264: 260: 255: 248: 246: 242: 238: 231: 229: 226: 222: 217: 210: 208: 201: 199: 195: 193: 189: 181: 179: 177: 171: 169: 160: 158: 156: 151: 142: 140: 137: 128: 124: 123:sign language 120: 117: 113: 109: 106: 103: 100: 96: 92: 91: 90: 83: 81: 77: 74: 70: 66: 62: 58: 54: 50: 41: 37: 30: 25: 20: 2502: 2498: 2473:cite journal 2462:. Retrieved 2445:(2): 63–84. 2442: 2438: 2428: 2417:. Retrieved 2413: 2404: 2393:. Retrieved 2384: 2375: 2363: 2352:. Retrieved 2348: 2339: 2328:. Retrieved 2324: 2315: 2293:(2): 170–9. 2290: 2286: 2280: 2269:. Retrieved 2267:. 2016-07-26 2264: 2255: 2244:. Retrieved 2242:. 2017-11-14 2239: 2230: 2197: 2193: 2187: 2165:(3): 353–7. 2162: 2158: 2152: 2127: 2123: 2117: 2106:. Retrieved 2102: 2092: 2083: 2077: 2060: 2056: 2050: 2033: 2029: 2023: 2011:. Retrieved 1999: 1974: 1970: 1964: 1931: 1927: 1921: 1888: 1884: 1878: 1845: 1841: 1835: 1802: 1798: 1792: 1783: 1738:(2): 220–3. 1735: 1731: 1721: 1688: 1684: 1674: 1657: 1640: 1636: 1613:(8): 220–3. 1610: 1606: 1596: 1585:. Retrieved 1583:. 2017-11-14 1580: 1571: 1560:. Retrieved 1551: 1540:. Retrieved 1536: 1512:. Retrieved 1499: 1466: 1462: 1456: 1421: 1417: 1407: 1372: 1368: 1358: 1326:(1): 27–34. 1323: 1319: 1309: 1284: 1280: 1274: 1257: 1253: 1247: 1212: 1208: 1198: 1163: 1159: 1149: 1114: 1110: 1100: 1083: 1072:. Retrieved 1068: 1059: 1042: 1038: 1032: 997: 993: 987: 975:. Retrieved 965: 954:. Retrieved 907: 903: 893: 884: 875: 864:. Retrieved 855: 843:. Retrieved 838: 829: 820: 811: 802: 793: 775:10665/204632 766: 761: 726: 722: 712: 677: 671: 647:(1): 11–30. 644: 640: 630: 597: 593: 587: 555:(6884): 38. 552: 548: 538: 516:(1): 79–87. 513: 509: 503: 491:. Retrieved 480: 469:. Retrieved 465: 456: 432:(2): 152–3. 429: 425: 394: 392: 353: 349: 326: 298: 291: 287:Apgar scores 280: 272: 259:Marion Downs 256: 252: 243: 239: 235: 218: 214: 205: 196: 185: 172: 164: 146: 132: 95:hearing aids 87: 78: 60: 56: 52: 48: 47: 2568:Neonatology 1643:(2): 20–6. 1369:Am J Audiol 221:territories 116:cued speech 2557:Categories 2464:2020-02-03 2419:2019-03-01 2395:2019-03-01 2354:2019-03-01 2330:2019-03-01 2321:"Profiles" 2271:2019-03-01 2246:2019-03-01 2194:Pediatrics 2108:2019-03-01 1928:Pediatrics 1885:Pediatrics 1842:Pediatrics 1799:Pediatrics 1685:Pediatrics 1587:2019-03-05 1562:2019-03-01 1542:2019-03-01 1463:Pediatrics 1209:Pediatrics 1160:Pediatrics 1111:Pediatrics 1074:2019-03-04 956:2019-03-01 866:2023-01-30 845:31 January 723:Pediatrics 471:2019-03-01 402:References 376:, and the 232:Challenges 136:audiologic 125:(see also 2573:Audiology 2499:Audiology 2459:229246375 1002:CiteSeerX 926:1101-1262 594:Cognition 257:In 1963, 211:Successes 73:screening 2511:10206521 2307:20207267 2222:40563482 2214:18595973 1991:13361864 1948:20679316 1913:21281636 1905:20679321 1870:20355285 1862:20679322 1827:24742556 1819:20679317 1762:23803975 1713:79426871 1705:17908777 1649:25208254 1619:20203554 1491:41306029 1448:28383538 1399:21940980 1350:18270176 1301:25654653 1239:27307144 1190:28689189 1141:21934188 1133:29117949 1051:17508530 1024:11667937 934:27009037 745:23530178 704:12432770 663:15448044 622:13278854 571:11986658 530:10079791 448:22446854 339:and the 84:Overview 2563:Hearing 2179:9738715 2144:8220282 2069:8401641 2013:6 March 1956:9448008 1753:4470168 1514:6 March 1483:7770297 1439:5562509 1390:4877695 1341:4111446 1230:4925076 1181:5595069 977:6 March 753:1725667 614:1841034 579:4313378 493:6 March 439:3336843 249:History 39:Purpose 2509:  2457:  2305:  2220:  2212:  2177:  2142:  2067:  1989:  1954:  1946:  1911:  1903:  1868:  1860:  1825:  1817:  1760:  1750:  1711:  1703:  1647:  1617:  1489:  1481:  1446:  1436:  1397:  1387:  1348:  1338:  1299:  1237:  1227:  1188:  1178:  1139:  1131:  1049:  1022:  1004:  932:  924:  841:. 2013 781:  751:  743:  702:  692:  661:  620:  612:  577:  569:  549:Nature 528:  446:  436:  2549:1999. 2455:S2CID 2372:(PDF) 2218:S2CID 2008:(PDF) 1952:S2CID 1909:S2CID 1866:S2CID 1823:S2CID 1709:S2CID 1666:(PDF) 1508:(PDF) 1487:S2CID 1260:(1). 1137:S2CID 1092:(PDF) 749:S2CID 618:S2CID 575:S2CID 362:LOINC 2507:PMID 2479:link 2303:PMID 2210:PMID 2175:PMID 2140:PMID 2065:PMID 2015:2019 1987:PMID 1944:PMID 1901:PMID 1858:PMID 1815:PMID 1758:PMID 1701:PMID 1645:PMID 1615:PMID 1516:2019 1479:PMID 1444:PMID 1395:PMID 1346:PMID 1297:PMID 1235:PMID 1186:PMID 1129:PMID 1047:PMID 1020:PMID 994:JAMA 979:2019 930:PMID 922:ISSN 847:2023 779:ISBN 741:PMID 700:PMID 690:ISBN 659:PMID 610:PMID 567:PMID 526:PMID 495:2019 444:PMID 372:the 61:EHDI 53:UNHS 2447:doi 2295:doi 2202:doi 2198:122 2167:doi 2163:133 2132:doi 2038:doi 1979:doi 1936:doi 1932:126 1893:doi 1889:126 1850:doi 1846:126 1807:doi 1803:126 1748:PMC 1740:doi 1693:doi 1689:120 1471:doi 1434:PMC 1426:doi 1385:PMC 1377:doi 1336:PMC 1328:doi 1289:doi 1262:doi 1225:PMC 1217:doi 1213:138 1176:PMC 1168:doi 1164:140 1119:doi 1115:140 1012:doi 998:286 912:doi 771:hdl 731:doi 727:131 682:doi 649:doi 602:doi 557:doi 553:417 518:doi 434:PMC 430:135 364:), 278:). 168:WIC 148:of 2559:: 2540:, 2503:38 2501:. 2475:}} 2471:{{ 2453:. 2441:. 2437:. 2412:. 2374:. 2347:. 2323:. 2301:. 2291:34 2289:. 2263:. 2238:. 2216:. 2208:. 2196:. 2173:. 2161:. 2138:. 2128:27 2126:. 2101:. 2061:11 2059:. 2032:. 1985:. 1975:46 1973:. 1950:. 1942:. 1930:. 1907:. 1899:. 1887:. 1864:. 1856:. 1844:. 1821:. 1813:. 1801:. 1782:. 1770:^ 1756:. 1746:. 1736:20 1734:. 1730:. 1707:. 1699:. 1687:. 1683:. 1641:63 1639:. 1627:^ 1611:59 1609:. 1605:. 1579:. 1535:. 1524:^ 1485:. 1477:. 1467:95 1465:. 1442:. 1432:. 1422:37 1420:. 1416:. 1393:. 1383:. 1373:20 1371:. 1367:. 1344:. 1334:. 1324:12 1322:. 1318:. 1295:. 1285:24 1283:. 1256:. 1233:. 1223:. 1211:. 1207:. 1184:. 1174:. 1162:. 1158:. 1135:. 1127:. 1113:. 1109:. 1067:. 1043:75 1041:. 1018:. 1010:. 996:. 942:^ 928:. 920:. 908:26 906:. 902:. 883:. 837:. 819:. 801:. 777:. 747:. 739:. 725:. 721:. 698:. 688:. 657:. 643:. 639:. 616:. 608:. 598:39 596:. 573:. 565:. 551:. 547:. 524:. 514:46 512:. 464:. 442:. 428:. 424:. 410:^ 178:. 129:). 114:, 2513:. 2481:) 2467:. 2449:: 2443:2 2422:. 2398:. 2357:. 2333:. 2309:. 2297:: 2274:. 2249:. 2224:. 2204:: 2181:. 2169:: 2146:. 2134:: 2111:. 2071:. 2044:. 2040:: 2034:8 2017:. 1993:. 1981:: 1958:. 1938:: 1915:. 1895:: 1872:. 1852:: 1829:. 1809:: 1786:. 1764:. 1742:: 1715:. 1695:: 1651:. 1590:. 1565:. 1545:. 1518:. 1493:. 1473:: 1450:. 1428:: 1401:. 1379:: 1352:. 1330:: 1303:. 1291:: 1268:. 1264:: 1258:1 1241:. 1219:: 1192:. 1170:: 1143:. 1121:: 1077:. 1053:. 1026:. 1014:: 981:. 959:. 936:. 914:: 887:. 869:. 849:. 823:. 787:. 773:: 755:. 733:: 706:. 684:: 665:. 651:: 645:8 624:. 604:: 581:. 559:: 532:. 520:: 497:. 474:. 450:. 101:; 59:( 51:(

Index


otoacoustic emission
auditory brainstem response
screening
hearing aids
cochlear implants
hearing assistive technology
auditory-verbal therapy
cued speech
sign language
American Sign Language
audiologic
congenital hearing loss
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)
WIC
cytomegalovirus
otoacoustic emissions
auditory brainstem response
territories
Office of Management and Budget
Marion Downs
Behavioral Observation Audiometry
startle responses
hyperbilirubinemia
bacterial meningitis
Apgar scores
C. Everett Koop
ototoxic medication
James T. Walsh
Congressional Hearing Health Caucus

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.