812:
write books (e.g. "Do You Really Need Back
Surgery" for Oxford University Press) to inform the general public. However, fortunately, Knowledge (XXG) has a wealth of knowledgeable contributors (many of whom conceal who they are). I guess I'd better stick to academics. However, it was my impression that this issue was raised when I first started doing contributions. These were reviewed and approved by other editors and appreciation expressed. There was no warning that I was violating some rule and needed to stop writing. I think you are mis-stating the policy, but as I said, please feel free to remove everything I have written if that is what your fellow editors think is appropriate. We have no idea who you are other than that you like fish so there is no verifiable way to learn when you are violating WP:COI. At least I am honest and upfront about who I am.
1203:
man. There is a small discussion going on about your work on the devolution biology article at wikipedia. If you could, could you do a post on the devolution talk page article, there is a section near the bottom of the page were i have mentioned your work, please respond in that section. Please note i am not a scientist or an expert on evolution so if i have misrepresented your book please clear that up on the talk page, but as mentioned i have based what i have said on others who have actually read your book. Please see here:
947:. Please feel free to add any comments you wish, or ignore it if you like. I wasn't the person who opened the topic, but I have replied to it stating that any potential conflict of interest you might have is outweighed by the importance of your contributions, and furthermore there is no evidence of any disruption of Knowledge (XXG) on your part (much the opposite in fact). Hopefully the discussion will end there but anything you wish to add to the discussion would be appreciated. --
474:
868:(XXG) is that you think you have something to say that will be informationally beneficial to readers - is that in itself a conflict since you are posting something that you wrote yourself with references that you selected. There is no way out of this cycle of interest other than to declare who is writing so that the reader can understand the conflicts on an open basis. For a wide variety of reasons, that is how it is done in academia.
606:
1848:
1437:
1050:
537:
1594:
1509:
1158:
1119:
deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with
Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the
867:
Looie496 - I think that if you have some other historical articles that cover CT, MRI and DTI then you could add those citations or replace mine. I thought it was a helpful summary - it certainly is not for sale so I'm not sure I see all aspects of the conflict. The reason why you write on
Knowledge
1787:
which was "it would be useful if you added to the disclosure on your
Userpage, a very high level (a sentence or two) discussion of NeuroGrafix' patent enforcement activities, which have included hospitals and universities as well as companies that sell MRI equipment, so that other editors are aware
1202:
Hi
Afiller. I understand you are the author of the book the Upright Ape. Now i have a friend who has read your book, and also many people on the internet have quoted from your book saying that your conclusions support devolution. That you are saying that the ape actually descended or devolved off
849:
I'm afraid I basically have to agree with
Tryptofish. It would be a real shame to lose your expertise, but the way you've been distributing citations around gives the appearance that one of your goals is to draw attention to that paper, and that's a problem. Let me note that for some of us, the
811:
Tryptofish - I wrote an extensive review of the history of computed radiology. I am a neurosurgeon. I then cited the review when I added to history sections in this field. In any case, I have no interest in violating any guidelines. Please feel free to remove all of my contributions. I teach and
791:
That's not what I'm saying. It's not a question of excluding people who are experts in a particular area from writing about it. It's about people citing their own work (or linking to their own websites, or writing their own biographies, etc., etc.). I'd love to cite some of my own publications on
664:
page, but could you put your addition in context in the section. I have tried to clean up that section a bit since your edit, but I'm not sure how to tie in diffusion MRI. Your paragraph seems to repeat much of the previous paragraph. Also, do you have a better reference? Your paper only briefly
715:
Hi Aaron -- I'm sorry, but there is no way that using an unreviewed preprint as a source accords with
Knowledge (XXG)'s policies. The paper itself looks nice, but it can't be used that way until it is published. Until then, I would have no problem with it being an "External link" or "Further
1303:
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the
1019:
Thanks for your comprehension. It is one of our "problems of success" that anything related to COI can get out of hand; but we should always stick to the line that discussion of articles is to improve them, rather than to comment on who is editing and why. I hope the business that brought
850:
reason we don't publicize our identities is precisely so that
Knowledge (XXG) issues don't get mixed up with ego issues -- if we weren't aware that you are the author of that paper, we would be able to discuss the suitability of the citations in a much more straightforward way. Regards,
1860:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before
Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
581:
deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with
Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines.
1788:
of the extent of your real world financial interest in this topic. " I had in mind something like: "NeuroGrafix has sued and continues to sue manufacturers of MRI equipment as well as users of MRI equipment like hospitals, universities, and imaging centers". Short, just facts.
999:
Atama - Thanks for the explanation. It appears that one of the editors has already removed the banner. I also did a drawing, references and a "How it Works" section on the Spin Echo page - just to be cautious - because it relates to MRI, I will put the COI notice on that page as
1299:
or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
1241:? Anyway, if you can clear up this discussion it will be very helpful. If possible, please point out published work which can be cited as need be to show your position on "devolution". Thanks for your very interesting concepts and your help with Knowledge (XXG), . .
759:
here. I'm making a guess, based on your user name and the name of the first author of the review. Perhaps, it might be better if you leave it for other editors to add the reference where appropriate. You could, of course, suggest it on articles' talk pages.
775:
Tryptofish - the problem comes in where you want to exclude everyone who works in a particular scientific field from writing about it - more or less the opposite of usual encyclopedia logic. In this case, the article in question is a review with over 150
1182:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.
1449:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
1071:, and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Knowledge (XXG) under one of the
1121:
1538:
1714:
This dynamic - science vs invention - is part of the problem in this issue. The other problem is that I do many different things and have inventions in many areas - unlike most scientists who concentrate on one area for an entire career
1802:
would be fine. (Note, no one other than you or an administrator should edit your Userpage. I just made the change to show you what it should like, and then immediately self-reverted). Please never edit another editor's Userpage)
1544:
1721:
My recent inventions are in using positrons, and in improving the accuracy of telomere replication. I have many pharamaceutical inventions. I have published books in a number of fields from computers to back surgery to patent
1609:, so it has been removed. Knowledge (XXG) is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
1888:
1725:
Sorry to waste your time with all this - but I do care about Knowledge (XXG) and am always sad to see history wiped off its pages because the analytic framework is encumbered with Wiki assumptions that don't always
1477:
885:
Aaron, I got your message at my talk. Thanks so much for your understanding. I'm glad we got that cleared up, and I certainly understand where you're coming from. Here's to editing together happily in the future!
1392:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
724:
at that level. The rationale for all this is that the function of references in Knowledge (XXG) is to validate the statements in the article, nothing more, and an unreviewed manuscript can't do that. Regards,
1079:
state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
1551:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
1109:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on
551:, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Knowledge (XXG) (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
1872:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1461:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1237:. Given that you cite Goethe, Geoffroy and Owen, it's rather delightful that the proposal is one which Owen would have abhorred, and which would have delighted Darwin – have you come across the
695:
Thanks for your recent work on the fMRI page - it looks really good now. The only problem is...you've made my reading list longer - this is an interesting method, I want to learn more now ;-)
1064:, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of
1513:
30:
1273:
1688:
All medical and scientific entities refused to fund the work as it was outlandish and unnecessary and no one was working in the area - he was funded by EMI the record company
973:
I don't think the banners are appropriate, but I'm not going to remove them while there's a discussion still ongoing at the COI noticeboard. I've indicated as much on the
161:
914:
P.P.S.: Just fyi, one of the reasons I edit anonymously is that I try to combat POV at pages about animal rights groups, and I'd prefer they not know where I live. --
1631:
Ok, thanks. I'm putting together all the various references and cites on an accessible page and will try to write up an explanation for your content reviewers.
1320:
1268:
because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the
1652:- This is attended by numerous publications before during and after and a following massive burst of citations by other as to what has just been accomplished
1674:
Soon everyone will realize that I've just transformed their field and this will make them not want to cite this as it makes their prior work seem off track
1671:
Now suddenly, out the blue with no precedent - I have come up with a startling advance that no one expected and that no one really cares about just yet.
205:
633:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
1365:
1342:
1039:
511:
353:
1700:
He would probably be deleted from Knowledge (XXG) if he wrote about what he had done (no references, no sources, no one to confirm anything).
450:
67:
or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the
1902:
1582:
on the article talk page, and to be very careful about raising claims about other editor's possible COIs, especially in light of your own.
1491:
1417:
201:
1649:
They did the experiment everyone agreed needed to be done and now, in a dramatic advance, they have gotten the result everyone expected.
384:
1543:
1537:
1353:, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks!
1330:, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks!
1178:
1706:
He won the Nobel prize. Most radiologists know of him because a measurement of X-ray intensity - Hounsefield units - is named for him.
1265:
428:
179:
327:
1517:
1083:
1072:
499:
256:
183:
1221:
Hi, Aaron, just to say we've been having this discussion as there seems to have been some confusion about the distinction between
1179:
1105:
1057:
1043:
64:
362:
357:
306:
1898:
1487:
1413:
1360:
1337:
1315:
1305:
1881:
1470:
796:. You could still ask on a talk page that someone else insert the ref, pointing out the validity of the cite as you see it. --
288:
125:
1140:
940:
628:
442:
293:
217:
1111:
34:
1065:
424:
318:
310:
234:
230:
192:
1806:
Please note that if you don't do this, the page may simply be deleted. We give people time to self-correct. Thanks.
1327:
1404:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
406:
366:
252:
213:
1893:
1482:
1409:
473:
900:
P.S.: I looked at that other page, and I'm definitely not that "basic truth" guy! Sorry you had to deal with that. --
379:
375:
239:
196:
1238:
1211:
1029:
634:
335:
221:
188:
1204:
1125:
569:
544:
530:
331:
322:
119:
115:
1869:
1458:
437:
433:
388:
1356:
1333:
1311:
1296:
1233:
could all have shared a common ancestor with an upright stance, which you would categorize as hominifom, or
1521:
1166:
486:
260:
226:
58:
1350:
1269:
1261:
755:. Aside from the points discussed just above, I want to ask, gently, whether there might be an issue with
700:
670:
605:
1520:
and Knowledge (XXG) pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
1405:
1162:
410:
301:
284:
247:
156:
1791:
Second, in general your Userpage is a CV and self-promotional, and this is explicitly disallowed by the
1207:
1025:
621:
482:
1792:
1606:
297:
111:
1024:
over to the WikiProject discussion page for mathematics is now smoothed down in a reasonable fashion.
1246:
1222:
919:
905:
891:
836:
828:
801:
765:
1856:
1445:
1427:
1381:
1372:
739:
Thanks. The article is reviewed and accepted. It can be relisted as "Neurosurgical Focus (in press)"
420:
1129:
1865:
1754:
1732:
1454:
1401:
1385:
1001:
869:
813:
777:
740:
680:
129:
855:
730:
82:
42:
446:
1090:
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding
554:
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding
1560:
1188:
696:
666:
587:
519:
485:. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Knowledge (XXG) takes
68:
1877:
1466:
1397:
1389:
974:
944:
932:
371:
243:
151:
1830:
1811:
1762:
1618:
1610:
1880:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1873:
1750:
1579:
1469:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1462:
1400:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1393:
1061:
793:
756:
548:
147:
1757:
policy is what it is - it is fundamental part of Knowledge (XXG) being able to function.
1281:
1242:
1095:
990:
960:
915:
901:
887:
832:
797:
761:
559:
504:
50:
977:. I don't think it will be too damaging to leave the banners up for a couple of days. --
1749:
Thanks but that note has nothing to do with the notice that I provided above. Please
1226:
679:
Thanks GyroMagician. A reference to a more focused and extensive paper has been added (
414:
1694:
He did finally write some articles but there are virtually no citations to any of them
1535:
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
1069:
1060:
requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under
547:
requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under
1602:
1021:
851:
726:
573:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
72:
1556:
1184:
717:
644:
583:
515:
1847:
1436:
1176:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
71:
field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing!
1826:
1825:) so you have seen this by now. I am nominating your userpage for deletion now.
1807:
1758:
1614:
1598:
939:
A topic regarding your contributions to Knowledge (XXG), specifically regarding
1703:
Yet he did totally transform medicine and saved hundreds of thousands of lives.
1637:
Once again - I do like to explain the difference between science and invention:
1049:
536:
1277:
1230:
979:
949:
1229:. From my quick reading of your various descriptions of your 2007 proposal,
1170:
751:
I came to this talk after seeing the reference added and then reverted at
1643:
Everyone expected a particular result and we all knew we had to get there
1884:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1593:
1508:
1473:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1388:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
612:
63:
1697:
He worked entirely alone, so he is the sole source of the information
1906:
1834:
1815:
1798:
Please reduce the content to a brief bit about you. Something like
1766:
1740:
1622:
1564:
1495:
1421:
1285:
1249:
1215:
1192:
1146:
1033:
1009:
993:
963:
923:
909:
895:
877:
859:
840:
821:
805:
785:
769:
734:
704:
688:
674:
650:
591:
523:
489:
very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the
86:
1529:
1234:
1173:
752:
721:
57:
on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to
1165:
and Knowledge (XXG) pages that have open discussion, you should
661:
616:
1887:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
1668:
No one had any idea of what new was needed nor how to get there
1646:
A particularly well funded and well equipped lab got the grant.
1476:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
510:
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the
497:
of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a
792:
pages to which they might relate, but I don't. I didn't write
271:
98:
24:
1276:
if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —
1115:
explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for
1048:
577:
explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for
535:
472:
1685:
A good example is Hounsfield's invention of the CT scanner
1691:
Once he had it working he never really published about it.
1665:
In invention, the "story" has to be completely different:
1161:
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
37:
to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out
1868:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1822:
1799:
1784:
1780:
1586:
1575:
1457:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
665:
touches on the subject - maybe ref 25 from your paper?
1753:
on the article Talk page. As to what you wrote, the
1291:
Notification of automated file description generation
1272:. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at
1380:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
1601:. I noticed that you made a comment on the page
469:Image copyright problem with Image:Arctan3LR.jpg
1062:section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion
969:Re: MR Neurography and Diffusion MRI COI issue
549:section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
1589:on the article talk page. I have removed it.
1106:the page that has been nominated for deletion
570:the page that has been nominated for deletion
8:
1640:In scientific advance the usual "story" is:
1128:the page or have a copy emailed to you. —/
600:
1524:. There are two ways to do this. Either:
720:article -- it probably doesn't belong in
625:was updated with a fact from the article
1821:You logged in and made a small change (
1532:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
1120:page does get deleted, you can contact
157:Where to ask questions or make comments
1256:Possibly unfree File:Brain CT scan.jpg
1266:Knowledge (XXG):Possibly unfree files
1260:A file that you uploaded or altered,
514:. Thanks again for your cooperation.
7:
1857:2017 Arbitration Committee elections
1446:2016 Arbitration Committee elections
1870:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
1570:Comment on content, not contributor
1459:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
1841:ArbCom 2017 election voter message
33:to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for
14:
1779:Hi Afiiller. 2 things. First,
1406:review the candidates' statements
1846:
1592:
1547:) located above the edit window.
1542:
1536:
1507:
1435:
1177:
1156:
1058:File:UK lab MRI Aaron Filler.jpg
1044:File:UK lab MRI Aaron Filler.jpg
933:Conflict of interest noticeboard
604:
62:
20:
1891:and submit your choices on the
660:Thanks for you addition to the
162:Request administrator attention
1854:Hello, Afiller. Voting in the
1443:Hello, Afiller. Voting in the
1412:. For the Election committee,
1382:Arbitration Committee election
1373:ArbCom elections are now open!
1286:14:52, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
941:Magnetic resonance neurography
629:Magnetic resonance neurography
512:media copyright questions page
1:
1496:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
1422:13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
1366:14:07, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
1349:Another one of your uploads,
1343:11:33, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
1326:Another one of your uploads,
1034:07:19, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
206:Biographies of living persons
94:
1907:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
1585:You went and head and wrote
1328:File:AG Filler RCS Award.jpg
1321:11:20, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
1480:and submit your choices on
1408:and submit your choices on
1147:07:31, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
545:Image:Fig1 AGF ArctanLR.jpg
531:Image:Fig1 AGF ArctanLR.jpg
231:Policy for non-free content
202:What Knowledge (XXG) is not
1924:
1899:MediaWiki message delivery
1516:. When you add content to
1514:welcome to Knowledge (XXG)
1488:MediaWiki message delivery
1478:the candidates' statements
1414:MediaWiki message delivery
1239:Great Hippocampus Question
1193:07:18, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
148:Frequently asked questions
61:on talk pages by clicking
1743:Aaron G. Filler, MD, PhD
1250:23:26, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
1216:09:36, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
1205:Talk:Devolution (biology)
1056:A tag has been placed on
1010:21:52, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
994:15:22, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
964:21:33, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
924:23:39, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
910:23:33, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
896:23:28, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
878:23:19, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
860:23:09, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
841:21:40, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
822:20:09, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
806:16:06, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
786:15:37, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
770:15:30, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
735:15:41, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
651:11:47, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
592:14:52, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
543:A tag has been placed on
87:21:53, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
1835:02:49, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
1816:16:56, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
1767:16:59, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
1741:10:52, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
1736:
1623:01:49, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
1565:18:34, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
1005:
873:
817:
781:
744:
705:14:40, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
689:05:08, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
684:
675:16:11, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
524:06:11, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
481:Thank you for uploading
1783:is nothing like what I
1297:File:Aaron G Filler.jpg
935:discussion notification
635:Did you know? talk page
477:Image Copyright problem
385:Pages needing attention
171:Policies and guidelines
1605:that didn't seem very
1351:File:Brain CT scan.jpg
1262:File:Brain CT scan.jpg
1124:to request that they
1053:
540:
505:image description page
478:
1866:Arbitration Committee
1455:Arbitration Committee
1428:ArbCom Elections 2016
1386:Arbitration Committee
1355:Message delivered by
1332:Message delivered by
1310:Message delivered by
1270:file description page
1264:, has been listed at
1052:
716:reading" item in the
539:
476:
180:Neutral point of view
130:upload and use images
1223:Devolution (biology)
1073:permitted conditions
257:Conflict of interest
184:No original research
1390:arbitration process
1122:one of these admins
529:Speedy deletion of
483:Image:Arctan3LR.jpg
363:The perfect article
307:No personal attacks
1882:arbitration policy
1471:arbitration policy
1430:: Voting now open!
1402:arbitration policy
1054:
943:, has been raised
711:unpublished review
541:
479:
434:Join a WikiProject
358:Develop an article
354:Be bold in editing
35:your contributions
1503:Your recent edits
1357:Theo's Little Bot
1334:Theo's Little Bot
1312:Theo's Little Bot
1152:Your recent edits
1143:
1135:
1082:add the relevant
1015:Recent discussion
641:
640:
466:
465:
462:
461:
458:
457:
294:Assume good faith
268:
267:
218:Three-revert rule
93:
92:
85:
41:below, ask me on
1915:
1850:
1751:focus on content
1596:
1580:focus on content
1546:
1540:
1511:
1439:
1208:Liveintheforests
1181:
1160:
1159:
1139:
1133:
1101:
1100:
1094:
1066:non-free content
1026:Charles Matthews
988:
985:
982:
958:
955:
952:
648:
608:
601:
565:
564:
558:
443:Useful templates
345:Writing articles
319:Community Portal
311:No legal threats
289:Resolve disputes
272:
235:Image use policy
193:Reliable sources
120:Getting mentored
116:Our five pillars
99:
95:
81:
75:George D. Watson
66:
55:
49:
29:Hello, Afiller!
25:
21:
1923:
1922:
1918:
1917:
1916:
1914:
1913:
1912:
1911:
1910:
1851:
1843:
1777:
1613:. Thank you.
1572:
1522:sign your posts
1505:
1500:
1499:
1483:the voting page
1440:
1432:
1410:the voting page
1376:
1295:Your upload of
1293:
1258:
1200:
1169:by typing four
1167:sign your posts
1157:
1154:
1144:
1098:
1092:
1091:
1047:
1040:Speedy deletion
1017:
986:
983:
980:
975:COI noticeboard
971:
956:
953:
950:
937:
713:
658:
646:
599:
562:
556:
555:
534:
471:
399:
367:Manual of style
346:
285:Build consensus
277:
253:Deletion policy
214:Manual of Style
172:
140:
104:
103:Getting started
89:
53:
47:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1921:
1919:
1889:the candidates
1852:
1845:
1844:
1842:
1839:
1838:
1837:
1776:
1773:
1772:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1723:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1704:
1701:
1698:
1695:
1692:
1689:
1680:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1672:
1669:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1657:
1656:
1655:
1654:
1653:
1647:
1644:
1638:
1627:
1574:I advised you
1571:
1568:
1549:
1548:
1533:
1504:
1501:
1441:
1434:
1433:
1431:
1425:
1379:
1375:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1346:
1345:
1292:
1289:
1274:the discussion
1257:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1227:common descent
1199:
1196:
1153:
1150:
1138:
1088:
1087:
1080:
1046:
1042:nomination of
1037:
1016:
1013:
998:
970:
967:
936:
930:
929:
928:
927:
926:
912:
898:
865:
864:
863:
862:
844:
843:
809:
808:
773:
772:
712:
709:
708:
707:
657:
656:fMRI Reference
654:
639:
638:
609:
598:
595:
533:
527:
470:
467:
464:
463:
460:
459:
456:
455:
454:
453:
440:
431:
417:
401:
400:
397:
394:
393:
392:
391:
382:
380:Disambiguation
369:
360:
348:
347:
344:
341:
340:
339:
338:
325:
315:
314:
313:
304:
291:
279:
278:
275:
269:
266:
265:
264:
263:
250:
240:External links
237:
224:
210:
209:
208:
199:
197:Citing sources
186:
174:
173:
170:
167:
166:
165:
164:
159:
154:
142:
141:
138:
135:
134:
133:
132:
122:
106:
105:
102:
91:
90:
76:
59:sign your name
28:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1920:
1909:
1908:
1904:
1900:
1896:
1895:
1890:
1885:
1883:
1879:
1875:
1871:
1867:
1862:
1859:
1858:
1849:
1840:
1836:
1832:
1828:
1824:
1820:
1819:
1818:
1817:
1813:
1809:
1804:
1801:
1796:
1794:
1789:
1786:
1782:
1774:
1768:
1764:
1760:
1756:
1752:
1748:
1747:
1746:
1745:
1744:
1742:
1738:
1734:
1724:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1716:
1705:
1702:
1699:
1696:
1693:
1690:
1687:
1686:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1673:
1670:
1667:
1666:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1661:
1651:
1650:
1648:
1645:
1642:
1641:
1639:
1636:
1635:
1634:
1633:
1632:
1629:
1628:Dear Jytdog,
1625:
1624:
1620:
1616:
1612:
1608:
1604:
1603:Diffusion MRI
1600:
1595:
1590:
1588:
1583:
1581:
1577:
1569:
1567:
1566:
1562:
1558:
1555:Thank you. --
1553:
1545:
1539:
1534:
1531:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1510:
1502:
1498:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1485:
1484:
1479:
1474:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1460:
1456:
1451:
1448:
1447:
1438:
1429:
1426:
1424:
1423:
1419:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1395:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1374:
1371:
1367:
1364:
1362:
1358:
1352:
1348:
1347:
1344:
1341:
1339:
1335:
1329:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1319:
1317:
1313:
1307:
1304:instructions
1301:
1298:
1290:
1288:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1255:
1251:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1206:
1197:
1195:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1180:
1175:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1151:
1149:
1148:
1142:
1136:
1132:
1127:
1123:
1118:
1114:
1113:
1112:the talk page
1108:
1107:
1097:
1085:
1084:copyright tag
1081:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1074:
1070:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1051:
1045:
1041:
1038:
1036:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1022:Diffusion MRI
1014:
1012:
1011:
1007:
1003:
996:
995:
992:
991:
989:
976:
968:
966:
965:
962:
961:
959:
946:
942:
934:
931:
925:
921:
917:
913:
911:
907:
903:
899:
897:
893:
889:
884:
883:
882:
881:
880:
879:
875:
871:
861:
857:
853:
848:
847:
846:
845:
842:
838:
834:
830:
826:
825:
824:
823:
819:
815:
807:
803:
799:
795:
790:
789:
788:
787:
783:
779:
771:
767:
763:
758:
754:
750:
749:
748:
746:
742:
737:
736:
732:
728:
723:
719:
710:
706:
702:
698:
694:
693:
692:
690:
686:
682:
677:
676:
672:
668:
663:
655:
653:
652:
649:
636:
632:
631:
630:
624:
623:
622:Did you know?
618:
614:
610:
607:
603:
602:
596:
594:
593:
589:
585:
580:
576:
572:
571:
561:
552:
550:
546:
538:
532:
528:
526:
525:
521:
517:
513:
508:
506:
502:
501:
500:copyright tag
496:
492:
488:
484:
475:
468:
452:
448:
444:
441:
439:
435:
432:
430:
426:
422:
418:
416:
412:
408:
405:
404:
403:
402:
398:Miscellaneous
396:
395:
390:
386:
383:
381:
377:
373:
370:
368:
364:
361:
359:
355:
352:
351:
350:
349:
343:
342:
337:
336:Mailing lists
333:
329:
326:
324:
320:
317:
316:
312:
308:
305:
303:
299:
295:
292:
290:
286:
283:
282:
281:
280:
276:The community
274:
273:
270:
262:
258:
254:
251:
249:
245:
241:
238:
236:
232:
228:
225:
223:
222:Sock puppetry
219:
215:
212:
211:
207:
203:
200:
198:
194:
190:
189:Verifiability
187:
185:
181:
178:
177:
176:
175:
169:
168:
163:
160:
158:
155:
153:
149:
146:
145:
144:
143:
137:
136:
131:
127:
123:
121:
117:
113:
110:
109:
108:
107:
101:
100:
97:
96:
88:
84:
79:
77:
74:
70:
65:
60:
56:
52:
44:
40:
36:
32:
27:
26:
23:
22:
16:
1892:
1886:
1863:
1855:
1853:
1805:
1797:
1790:
1778:
1731:
1713:
1630:
1626:
1611:my talk page
1591:
1584:
1573:
1554:
1550:
1506:
1481:
1475:
1452:
1444:
1442:
1377:
1354:
1331:
1309:
1302:
1294:
1259:
1201:
1155:
1130:
1116:
1110:
1103:
1089:
1055:
1018:
997:
978:
972:
948:
938:
866:
827:Answered at
810:
774:
738:
718:Neuroimaging
714:
697:GyroMagician
678:
667:GyroMagician
659:
642:
627:
626:
620:
578:
574:
567:
553:
542:
509:
498:
494:
490:
480:
451:User scripts
332:IRC channels
323:Village pump
139:Getting help
73:
69:edit summary
46:
43:my talk page
39:Getting Help
38:
1894:voting page
1793:WP:USERPAGE
1597:Hello, I'm
1104:the top of
776:references.
597:10 July DYK
568:the top of
438:Translation
389:Peer review
126:edit a page
45:, or place
1878:topic bans
1795:policy.
1518:talk pages
1512:Hello and
1467:topic bans
1398:topic bans
1308:. Thanks!
1243:dave souza
1231:Hominoidea
1198:Devolution
1163:talk pages
916:Tryptofish
902:Tryptofish
888:Tryptofish
833:Tryptofish
798:Tryptofish
762:Tryptofish
419:Clean up:
415:Talk pages
411:User pages
376:Categories
261:Notability
227:Copyrights
112:A tutorial
78:(Dendodge)
1874:site bans
1785:requested
1755:WP:VERIFY
1528:Add four
1463:site bans
1394:site bans
1171:halfwidth
487:copyright
429:Vandalism
407:User name
302:Etiquette
248:Vandalism
1775:Userpage
852:Looie496
727:Looie496
493:and the
328:Signpost
298:Civility
124:How to:
17:Welcome!
1733:Afiller
1557:SineBot
1361:opt-out
1338:opt-out
1316:opt-out
1185:SineBot
1134:endaliv
1002:Afiller
870:Afiller
829:my talk
814:Afiller
778:Afiller
741:Afiller
681:Afiller
613:10 July
584:Sdrtirs
516:Sdrtirs
503:to the
491:license
421:General
31:Welcome
1827:Jytdog
1808:Jytdog
1759:Jytdog
1726:apply.
1615:Jytdog
1599:Jytdog
1530:tildes
1384:. The
1174:tildes
1126:userfy
1117:speedy
1096:hangon
1075:then:
794:WP:COI
757:WP:COI
645:Nataly
579:speedy
560:hangon
495:source
51:helpme
1607:civil
1278:Bkell
1235:human
1000:well.
753:Brain
722:Brain
447:Tools
372:Stubs
1903:talk
1864:The
1831:talk
1823:diff
1812:talk
1800:this
1781:this
1763:talk
1737:talk
1722:law.
1619:talk
1587:this
1576:here
1561:talk
1492:talk
1453:The
1418:talk
1306:here
1282:talk
1247:talk
1225:and
1212:talk
1189:talk
1030:talk
1006:talk
945:here
920:talk
906:talk
892:talk
874:talk
856:talk
837:talk
831:. --
818:talk
802:talk
782:talk
766:talk
745:talk
731:talk
701:talk
685:talk
671:talk
662:fMRI
617:2008
588:talk
520:talk
425:Spam
244:Spam
152:Tips
83:Talk
1578:to
1541:or
1378:Hi,
1141:Δ's
1102:to
643:--
611:On
566:to
1905:)
1897:.
1876:,
1833:)
1814:)
1765:)
1739:)
1621:)
1563:)
1494:)
1486:.
1465:,
1420:)
1396:,
1284:)
1245:,
1214:)
1191:)
1183:--
1145:/
1137://
1099:}}
1093:{{
1068:.
1032:)
1008:)
984:am
981:At
954:am
951:At
922:)
908:)
894:)
886:--
876:)
858:)
839:)
820:)
804:)
784:)
768:)
760:--
747:)
733:)
703:)
691:)
687:)
673:)
637:.
619:,
615:,
590:)
563:}}
557:{{
522:)
507:.
449:•
445:•
436:•
427:-
423:-
413:•
409:•
387:•
378:•
374:•
365:•
356:•
334:•
330:•
321:•
309:•
300:•
296:•
287:•
259:•
255:•
246:•
242:•
233:•
229:•
220:•
216:•
204:•
195:•
191:•
182:•
150:•
128:•
118:•
114:•
54:}}
48:{{
1901:(
1829:(
1810:(
1761:(
1735:(
1617:(
1559:(
1490:(
1416:(
1363:)
1359:(
1340:)
1336:(
1318:)
1314:(
1280:(
1210:(
1187:(
1131:M
1086:.
1028:(
1004:(
987:a
957:a
918:(
904:(
890:(
872:(
854:(
835:(
816:(
800:(
780:(
764:(
743:(
729:(
699:(
683:(
669:(
647:a
586:(
575:]
518:(
80:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
