742:
involve a statement asserting that young earth creationism had been largely discredited. It was tagged, then promptly deleted. I agree that the wording could be clearer to avoid weasel words, but again, does anyone actually contest that statement (from a scientific perspective, not a theological perspective)? Is there really anyone who could say with a straight face "the majority of scientists actually think that young earth creationism is a valid interpretation of the evidence" or "modern cosmological and biological theories, which are supported by an overwhelming majority of scientists, are totally compatible with young earth creationism"? No. Because modern scientific theories have discredited young earth creationism as a valid explanation for the evidence. Belief in YEC requires faith. I don't think mentioning that it is overwhelmingly discredited by scientific evidence is overly critical to put in the lead, as long as it is clear who or what has discredited it as a viable evidence-based theory. Creationists often seem to reject science outright and turn to faith as the sole rationale for their beliefs, so how is the view of the majority of scientists overly critical? If creationists are right about science, then scientific criticisms of creationism would actually be silly and meaningless. YEC, as a theory explaining the origins of the cosmos and life on earth, is in direct conflict with the evidence (and the people who study that evidence). That may or may not be important to some people. How about presenting both sides in a factual way that does not give undue weight to any single opinion and let readers decide for themselves? Isn't that what NPOV is all about? Either way, I think we can move this discussion to the article talk page, since it involves the article. Thanks. —
973:, which is much easier than using the undo function on the article's edit history (Twinkle allows you to rollback all recent changes made by a particular editor, rather than just the most recent edit). Twinkle is supposed to give you three options when rolling back changes: 1) AGF rollback 2) Neutral rollback 3)Vandalism rollback. Sometimes, due to a glitch in the script (I assume), the neutral option is not shown and I have to choose between vandalism and AGF. Choosing vandalism does not allow me to write my own edit summary, and if it edit wasn't clear vandalism then the only other option is AGF. Also, unless someone is clearly showing bad faith with their edits, it can never hurt to assume that they were actually trying to improve the article (no matter how bizarre or seemingly POV the edit was -- a lot of new user simply don't understand what NPOV is all about). In reference to the specific edit you mentioned, it turns out that User:Ombudsman was acting in good faith according to the consensus on the talk page (the only thing that possibly crossed a line was his use of "nonsensical" to describe the information he removed. It was obviously not nonsensical) I hope this helps. Thanks. —
1089:. Not only did you give a thorough summary of prior discussions, but you presented it in a well-reasoned and approachable fashion--and in a calm fashion also. (I've certainly seen debates at other talk pages where the comments just fanned the flames; I don't see where yours would do that at all.) Again, my compliments on a talk page comment that says the things I'd like to have said but was worded three times better than I could have! —
2085:
2014:
548:
497:
have their reasons (whatever you and I might think of those reasons) have the image hidden and the warning. That way the edit war can come to an end. I think, lets just leave it. We might have a consensus if we leave the page as it is. And technically, the page should just describe the test, and the controversy (these are facts), and leave the interpretation to the reader. What d'ya reckon?
1658:
1632:. If none of these statements represents your current position, please compose your own or simply sign "Not applicable" under "Other quick clarifications". Likewise sign as N/A if you do not want to participate further in this debate. If you choose not to respond then you will likely not be counted with respect to further consensus-determining efforts. –
1784:
21:
1037:
2102:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
922:. It is as simple as that. You have assumed bad faith, been uncivil, and engaged in personal attacks rather than arguing your position on its merits. Please stop. Please do not post anything on my user page or my talk page again. If you wish to respond to a template that I have placed on your talk page, please respond there. Keep the debate at
778:
of it can come in a later paragraph, but the lead sets the tone for the article, and saying what other people think of it is a bit much too soon. I wholeheartedly agree with the criticisms, but they aren't integral to why creationism is notable, so it doesn't belong in the lead -- I think. I could be misunderstanding policy, tell me if I am.
1852:
The directive is supposed to hide userspace files, including draft articles, or former articles userified for revision, from search engines. Without the directive search engines still find them, and, for deleted articles, those who favoored deletion can argue the user space article's findability via
1757:
in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this,
1593:
talk page and archives. At some point, you have commented on the issue of the display and/or placement of the
Rorschach inkblot image. Based on my understanding of your comment(s), I have placed you into one of three categories. I am issuing this note so that you can review how I have placed you, and
1486:
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other
Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work.
777:
Ok, so it has nothing to do with this discussion -- I'm an idiot. In any case, though it is obviously true that it is widely criticized, the lead in an article is about what the thing is -- not really about what anyone else thinks about it. At least, that's my opinion. I could be wrong. The criticism
589:
Hey Diego, This is really off topic, but I've been watching your discussion with Ward and I wondered if you might have some tips for me. You used the word Voodoo. I'm doing a
Masters on Magic Thinking, and I'm wondering if you have any pointers on that topic? Maybe you could email me? I'd be grateful
1130:
Category:Pro-life movement and
Category:Pro-choice movement for deletion. I believe that this is an unreasonable response to the discussion on Talk:Crisis pregnancy pregnancy. It might benefit the situation if someone familiar with the user would weigh in, because I'm at a loss as to how to approach
741:
Gscshoyru, I'm a little confused. Your recent reversion of my edit doesn't seem to have anything to do with the discussion above. Does it? The above comments were in reference to a phrase that redundantly mentioned "religious" and "deity" in the same sentence. Your edit, on the other hand, seemed to
1761:
We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would
824:
not be appropriate for the lead. Then again, I think most readers would either be aware that creationism and scientific evidence are at odds, or would quickly find out by reading further into the article. It is definitely a gray area, and I don't feel strongly enough about my position to revert any
1815:
You say your an anti-abortion and a pro-choice. That is soooooorta impossible. An anti-abortion is someone against abortions and a pro-choice is someone that says the pregnant woman should be the one to choose if she is getting an abortion or not. They are sorta opposites in this very long debate.
496:
Hi Diego, I agree 100% with your sentiments about the test. But I would like to see the issue resolved. I had no problem seeing the image by clicking the link, and the entire set from the link further down the page. People who, like me, want to see the blots, can just do what I did. Let those who
641:
I'm writing about your edit comment, undoing my change. My change, if you will remember was to change the statement that "creationism is the religious belief that ... was created by a deity" to "belief that ... was created by a deity". I am not denying that creationism is a religious belief; how
1730:
I've been ordered to fix the page so that it accords with my understanding of the NPOV policy. I'm happy to do that but I have a lot of work at my job. Now I've been told that I must make the changes by April 30th or the NPOV tag will be removed. I simply can't learn how to use
Knowledge as a
2026:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before
Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1881:
815:
Gscshoyru, I think it all depends on how you look at creationism. If you look at it as a theory regarding the origin of the universe and life on earth, then it is certainly notable (even in the lead) that it is a fringe theory not supported by the overwhelming scientific evidence (see
1015:
they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you!
1794:
regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is
1548:
Would you will be willing to answer a few questions about your experience? We've done considerable background research, but we would also like to gather the insight of the actual editors. Details about the project can be found at the user page of the project leader,
1762:
sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.
903:
As for the three edit rule, you should stop breaking it. You are making bad faith edits. They are beyond doubt bad faith. And they will be removed, count on that. If you keep reinserting in bad faith, then you are causing trouble, and you risk being banned.
1200:
There was nothing libelous in what was included in the Mnuez commentary on Watson. In fact, after having a look at your own pages, I'm quite sure that you'll agree that there's nothing libelous in the Mnuez commentary. Please read it again. - mnuez
716:, I disagree. I reverted again 'cause I didn't realize there was a discussion, but I won't revert again until this is resolved. Though the existence of criticism should obviously be mentioned, it really doesn't belong in the lead, even if cited.
418:] under the 'education' sub- section some one put useless information. i.e. they put, "The jv team really needs Fb Ketran Dawn " after the listing of the Levelland High school mascot. It should probably be removed since it is unimportant Thanks
1846:
1544:
I need your help. I am working on a research project at Boston
College, studying creation of medical information on Knowledge. You are being contacted, because you have been identified as an important contributor to one or more articles.
1044:. Please do not move articles by copying and pasting them because it splits the article's history, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the
669:
Thanks for your apology. It's much appreciated. I'd be obliged if you would undo your own edit yourself, since I've already been warned for 'edit warring'; I'd like to make it clear that this isn't just me re-doing my edit again. Thanks.
626:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!
1125:
I am beginning to understand the comment you left the other day on my user page about
Photouploaded. Unable to achieve the desired result at the CPC article, Photouploaded has decided to move on to the categorization system itself,
478:, onto my talk page. Could you please not do that anymore? It splits the discussion into two discussions where there really only needs to be one. In case you thought I would miss what you said, not to fear, I already am watching
1148:
I'm not really surprised by his actions. He seems to get hostile very quickly over seemingly minor issues and is often not very willing to compromise. I'll take a look at the CfD discussion. Thanks for letting me know.
1972:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
1898:, and leave me a heads-up, on my talk page, telling me you have done so? I may re-use some of this material, and I would like to keep track of the revision history, so I can properly attribute everyone's work.
2054:
1205:
No it is not libelous. It was an automated template and the BLP/libel message was the closest to explaining why the link was not appropriate. Basically, your addition (a blog) to the external links section of
1560:
The questions should only take a few minutes. I hope you will be willing to complete the survey, as we do value your insight. Please do not hesitate to contact me or
Professor Kane if you have any questions.
899:
No matter how many times you claim that your edits do not violate wiki reliability, it won't make it true. Links to forums are not wiki verifiable, and just because you weant them does not change that fact.
1440:
2038:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
949:
your edit summaries often use the phrase "good faith edits", but sometimes they are obviously not good faith edits. Why do you use that phrase? I have also seen others do it and am wondering. --
1131:
some of the recent comments, which veer more toward the contributor than the content. Would you consider looking into the CfD discussion if you have the time? It would be greatly appreciated. -
1523:
I would appreciate your co-operation with regards to improving the James Watson article, and the stubborn refusal of
Landerman to allow edits of the topic until he see's fit. Thankyou.--
1672:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also
1683:
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to
1127:
996:
563:
1684:
642:
could I? I think that any belief in a deity is obviously religious, and we have no need to say it twice. Shorter is better than longer. Just trying to improve the English.
1629:
1611:
1607:
1603:
416:
Diego, i'm not the most skilled wikipedia user, and it seems you know a bit more about wikipedia than i do, so i figured i'd tell you that on the page for Levelland, Texas
1727:
Since you are an active participant in the Rational Skepticism WikiProject, would you mind looking over the Knowledge entry on Theosophy to see if you find any concerns?
1352:
1895:
652:
Sorry. Quick sloppy edit without reading the entire diff. You are right. It was redundant and you improved the clarity of the statement. Please accept my apology. —
1053:
1008:
507:
Sounds good. I was responding to the RFC, so I was a bit confused regarding the current state of the page, but hiding the picture sounds like a good compromise. —
115:
1222:
guidelines. As commentary from a non-notable source (you), it is not appropriate for inclusion in an encyclopedia article, or as an external link. Thanks. —
1884:
for several reasons. First the nominator mentioned me by name, but they didn't bother to inform me of this, which is a definite lapse from collegiality.
448:
Hi, I'm a student from Mexico and I'm looking for information about your univertsity Masters program, aynthing can be useful. Thanks User:Hector_Magaña
1766:
1580:
1594:
to signal if this is an appropriate placement and/or to make known your current thoughts on this matter. You may either participate in discussion at
1796:
1791:
918:
that you have no support for your opinion. You have not achieved consensus on the talk page. Stop removing material from the article to prove your
159:
1887:
You made excellent points, and, if I had been aware of the discussion I would have worked with you to address the delete party's named concerns.
2114:
1171:
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Diego! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply
1382:
2068:
1997:
455:
304:
388:
326:
1628:
Further to the above, we would appreciate if you could briefly take the time to place yourself below one of the suggested statements
1347:
313:
623:
820:). If it were being discussed in the article solely from a theological perspective, I suppose that the scientific opinion of it
2064:
1993:
1647:
1000:
433:
340:
155:
133:
210:
150:
1765:
Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just
1066:
Sorry. I don't know what I was thinking. I put a history merge tamplate on the article. Hopefully that will do the trick —
1921:
1048:
at the top of the page. If there is an article that you cannot move yourself by this process, follow the instructions at
474:
Hi, I just wanted to let you know I was confused by the fact that you duplicated the entire three paragraphs you wrote at
308:
260:
2047:
1422:
1052:. Also, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at
1040:
Thank you for your contributions to Knowledge. It appears that recently you carried out a copy and paste page move from
479:
475:
278:
242:
83:
1984:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
2098:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
2059:
1989:
380:
247:
171:
2103:
2099:
1665:
1554:
1342:
1297:
1218:
guidelines, and c) was supporting contentious information that is not appropriate for a biographical article under
1176:
1172:
1165:
336:
269:
264:
188:
137:
87:
2094:
1394:
1180:
1049:
559:
206:
167:
1867:
1857:
1506:
1448:
1317:
362:
358:
193:
146:
858:
By the way, thanks for moving User:Harry Mudd's comments from my user page. I appreciate it. Happy editing. —
459:
1877:, and lets other contributors know the plans for the file (and that is won't be searched by search engines.
1458:
1417:
286:
175:
142:
555:
541:
1929:
1739:
1476:
282:
273:
77:
1669:
1651:
1041:
2035:
1569:
1471:
1184:
591:
498:
322:
317:
1758:
as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.
1708:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --
671:
643:
509:
1731:
newcomer, become familiar with all the sources, and make the edits if I must do it all by April 30th.
1824:
1713:
1673:
1495:
1430:
1332:
1086:
905:
609:
532:
527:
451:
421:
214:
180:
1882:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of Guantanamo Bay detainees accused of possessing Casio watches
580:
They're in my office. I'll scan them tomorrow or over the weekend and send them out. Happy editing.
1985:
1595:
1453:
1412:
1312:
1260:
1245:
891:
Diego, maybe you should look at the quotes at the top of your page and think about what they mean.
605:
562:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at
429:
371:
255:
238:
201:
110:
1256:
I also warned RucasHost, as he has a history of contentious editing over subjects such as this. --
1906:
1528:
1435:
1367:
1327:
1045:
483:
251:
184:
73:
2022:
1961:
1952:
1925:
1770:
1735:
1307:
332:
2031:
1981:
1965:
1694:
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the
1565:
1550:
1377:
1357:
1302:
1137:
1096:
958:
923:
713:
620:, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button
616:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the
2046:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1980:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1003:
to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to
2122:
1820:
1709:
1404:
1337:
1276:
1215:
1004:
919:
384:
1610:
or quick clarifications/affirmations based on several pre-written statements can be made
2043:
1977:
1969:
1800:
1754:
1638:
1620:
1599:
1587:
1510:
1499:
1399:
1322:
1257:
1242:
1017:
779:
717:
425:
375:
366:
197:
1734:
Would you look over the Theosophy page? Also, can you recommend anything? Thanks much,
1664:
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for
2039:
1973:
1902:
1705:
1698:
template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
1695:
1688:
1677:
1524:
1362:
1219:
989:
581:
567:
105:
547:
1372:
1211:
1207:
970:
628:
2013:
1896:
User:Geo Swan/List_of_Guantanamo_Bay_detainees_accused_of_possessing_Casio_watches
1241:
Deleted, salted. Thanks for letting me know, I kinda figured that would happen. --
52:
If I leave a message on your page, please post any responses on your page. Thanks.
1132:
1091:
999:. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Knowledge and
951:
1847:
User:Diego/List of Guantanamo Bay detainees accused of possessing Casio watches
1657:
2118:
1940:
1891:
1224:
1151:
1108:
1068:
1057:
975:
928:
860:
817:
744:
689:
654:
408:
26:
1723:
New Rational Skepticism WikiProject member asking for look at Theosophy entry
526:
Thanks for your comments! I have left a response for you on my talk page. --
1633:
1615:
617:
30:
45:
If you leave a message on this page, I will respond on this page so please
1466:
1175:. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other
1026:
In this case I think the level of vandalism warranted an immediate block.
2050:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1279:
predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
1036:
825:
more of your edits if you don't think the criticism belongs in the lead.
622:
1292:
1783:
1853:
search engine is an end-run around its deletion. Some people add a
1505:
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on
895:
An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation"
2126:
2072:
2001:
1946:
1933:
1910:
1828:
1805:
1790:
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the
1773:
1743:
1717:
1640:
1622:
1573:
1532:
1513:
1265:
1250:
1230:
1187:
1157:
1142:
1114:
1100:
1074:
1060:
1020:
981:
963:
934:
908:
866:
782:
750:
720:
695:
674:
660:
646:
631:
613:
594:
584:
570:
534:
515:
501:
486:
463:
437:
411:
1968:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
1586:
Please be advised that I have recently conducted a review of the
1487:
Your contributions make Knowledge better -- thanks for helping.
1890:
If you decide you don't want the material to be a subpage under
1441:
List of the most popular names in the 1890s in the United States
2053:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
1557:. Your privacy and confidentiality will be strictly protected!
1602:; but to keep things in one place, you should also clarify at
15:
1753:
Hey Diego. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the
225:
60:
2083:
1782:
1656:
604:
Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
546:
1880:
For what it is worth, I was troubled by the discussion at
608:
and Knowledge pages that have open discussion, you should
1799:". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
1779:
Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
2034:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1839:
1509:. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. --
946:
997:
Knowledge:Administrator intervention against vandalism
564:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Mishpachah Lev-Tsiyon
1494:
on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on
1685:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/DigiTech Bad Monkey
1173:
download and install VandalProof from our main page
554:An article that you have been involved in editing,
2113:will be deleted after seven days, as described in
1604:Talk:Rorschach test/2009 consensus review/addendum
2080:Orphaned non-free image File:NollScandalCover.jpg
1960:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
1353:Metropolitan School District of Lawrence Township
1011:(one that mentions that the user may be blocked)
1272:Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
476:Talk:Crisis pregnancy center#Female adolescents?
1054:Knowledge:Cut and paste move repair holding pen
2115:section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion
2109:Note that any non-free images not used in any
1873:directive to their userspace files, it adds a
1081:Excellent comment at Richard Dawkins talk page
8:
1916:Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians
1085:Thank you for your well-written comment at
1007:users if they have received a recent final
1581:Talk:Rorschach test/2009 consensus review
1792:Knowledge:Dispute resolution noticeboard
1704:This is an automatic notification by a
111:Where to ask questions or make comments
33:and may not respond swiftly to queries.
1383:Florida School for the Deaf and Blind
914:I have not made bad faith edits. You
482:and will respond there. Thank you.
7:
2023:2017 Arbitration Committee elections
1553:. Survey questions can be found at
969:Good question. It is because I use
2007:ArbCom 2017 election voter message
995:Thank you for making a report on
14:
1986:review the candidates' statements
1591:(formerly Rorschach inkblot test)
1348:Perris Union High School District
1281:
2012:
1606:. Longer statements may be made
1035:
621:
19:
2057:and submit your choices on the
1179:, or you can post a message on
116:Request administrator attention
1992:. For the Election committee,
1962:Arbitration Committee election
1953:ArbCom elections are now open!
1938:Ain't nobody missing, here! —
1811:Your User page makes no sense!
487:13:25, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
464:21:09, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
2104:our policy for non-free media
2036:Knowledge arbitration process
2002:16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
1934:09:33, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
1922:Knowledge:Missing Wikipedians
1911:19:27, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
1774:21:44, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
1718:01:21, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
1514:01:52, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
160:Biographies of living persons
78:The five pillars of Knowledge
56:
2127:18:59, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
2073:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
2020:Hello, Diego. Voting in the
1749:Article Feedback Tool update
1533:22:55, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
1423:List of schools in Hong Kong
1266:06:18, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
1251:06:11, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
1231:20:03, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
1188:05:16, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
1158:19:42, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
1143:01:24, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
1115:16:18, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
1101:15:43, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
1075:19:48, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
1061:19:34, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
1021:21:27, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
982:15:36, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
964:06:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
935:16:40, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
909:16:25, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
867:16:49, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
783:00:30, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
751:00:19, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
721:22:29, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
696:17:48, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
675:17:46, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
661:17:42, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
647:17:39, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
480:Talk:Crisis pregnancy center
438:22:22, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
1988:and submit your choices on
1920:You have been mentioned at
1668:. The nominated article is
1507:the SuggestBot request page
632:16:07, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
595:22:17, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
585:01:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
571:03:53, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
535:16:37, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
516:03:30, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
502:03:18, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
2142:
2065:MediaWiki message delivery
1994:MediaWiki message delivery
1744:15:08, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
1502:, SuggestBot's caretaker.
1343:St. John Bosco High School
1298:Bishop Dwenger High School
1284:
412:03:35, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
106:Frequently Asked Questions
2095:File:NollScandalCover.jpg
2084:
1947:21:16, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
1829:16:59, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
1767:drop them at the talkpage
1691:with four tildes (~~~~).
1641:14:44, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
1574:03:32, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
1395:Miami Killian High School
1388:
1050:Knowledge:Requested moves
1806:02:32, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
1623:14:52, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
1449:Brussels-Halle-Vilvoorde
1318:Kingston Parish, Jamaica
1001:all users are encouraged
687:I'll do it right now. —
40:My messaging preferences
1894:, could you move it to
1459:Philosophy of education
314:Pages needing attention
309:Help develop an article
125:Policies and Guidelines
2089:
1838:I took the liberty of
1787:
1661:
1496:SuggestBot's talk page
1418:Math Science Institute
558:, has been listed for
551:
2092:Thanks for uploading
2087:
2032:Arbitration Committee
1966:Arbitration Committee
1786:
1755:Article Feedback Tool
1696:articles for deletion
1678:What Knowledge is not
1660:
1596:the article talk page
1555:geraldckane/medsurvey
1472:Education in Colombia
556:Mishpachah Lev-Tsiyon
550:
542:Mishpachah Lev-Tsiyon
156:What Knowledge is not
134:Neutral point of view
1687:. Please be sure to
1674:Knowledge:Notability
1431:Scientific community
1333:History of astrology
1087:Talk:Richard Dawkins
887:Moved from user page
576:Rorschach references
327:Translating articles
211:Conflict of interest
151:No original research
1970:arbitration process
1670:DigiTech Bad Monkey
1652:DigiTech Bad Monkey
1598:or leave a note at
1477:Exposé (journalism)
1454:Papal infallibility
1413:Applied kinesiology
1313:Daniel David Palmer
1181:the discussion page
1042:Digitech Bad Monkey
261:No personal attacks
2090:
2048:arbitration policy
1982:arbitration policy
1788:
1689:sign your comments
1662:
1436:Biblical cosmology
1368:Criterion validity
1328:Straightway School
552:
540:AfD nomination of
323:Join a WikiProject
305:Be bold in editing
243:Resolving disputes
74:Knowledge Tutorial
2100:claim of fair use
1614:. Best regards, –
1484:
1483:
1308:Normative science
1214:, b) was against
1210:was a)not from a
1140:
712:Actually, as per
600:Your recent edits
466:
454:comment added by
440:
424:comment added by
400:
399:
396:
395:
248:Assume good faith
222:
221:
172:Three-revert rule
37:
36:
2133:
2086:
2016:
1945:
1943:
1872:
1866:
1862:
1856:
1803:
1797:Saving Mr. Banks
1378:Samuel Hahnemann
1358:Krum High School
1303:Kenneth Copeland
1282:
1263:
1248:
1229:
1227:
1156:
1154:
1136:
1113:
1111:
1073:
1071:
1039:
980:
978:
941:Good faith edits
933:
931:
924:Talk:James Randi
865:
863:
749:
747:
694:
692:
659:
657:
625:
592:MarkAnthonyBoyle
514:
512:
499:MarkAnthonyBoyle
449:
419:
381:Useful templates
270:Community Portal
265:No legal threats
226:
189:Image use policy
138:Reliable sources
61:
57:
23:
22:
16:
2141:
2140:
2136:
2135:
2134:
2132:
2131:
2130:
2117:. Thank you. --
2082:
2077:
2076:
2017:
2009:
1990:the voting page
1956:
1949:
1941:
1939:
1918:
1870:
1868:userspace notes
1864:
1860:
1858:userspace draft
1854:
1836:
1813:
1801:
1781:
1751:
1725:
1655:
1584:
1540:
1521:
1498:. Thanks from
1405:Spiritual abuse
1338:Applied science
1274:
1261:
1246:
1239:
1225:
1223:
1212:reliable source
1198:
1196:Regarding Libel
1169:
1152:
1150:
1123:
1109:
1107:
1083:
1069:
1067:
1033:
993:
976:
974:
943:
929:
927:
926:. Thank you. —
889:
861:
859:
745:
743:
690:
688:
655:
653:
639:
612:by typing four
610:sign your posts
602:
578:
545:
524:
510:
508:
494:
472:
470:User talk pages
446:
405:
351:
297:
239:Build consensus
231:
207:Deletion policy
168:Manual of Style
126:
98:
88:upload an image
66:
65:Getting Started
42:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2139:
2137:
2081:
2078:
2055:the candidates
2018:
2011:
2010:
2008:
2005:
1959:
1955:
1950:
1937:
1917:
1914:
1835:
1832:
1812:
1809:
1780:
1777:
1750:
1747:
1724:
1721:
1654:
1650:nomination of
1645:
1644:
1643:
1588:Rorschach test
1583:
1577:
1561:
1559:
1558:
1547:
1546:
1543:
1539:
1538:Survey request
1536:
1520:
1517:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1474:
1469:
1464:
1461:
1456:
1451:
1446:
1443:
1438:
1433:
1428:
1425:
1420:
1415:
1410:
1407:
1402:
1400:U.S. Route 275
1397:
1392:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1380:
1375:
1370:
1365:
1360:
1355:
1350:
1345:
1340:
1335:
1330:
1325:
1323:Philip Kitcher
1320:
1315:
1310:
1305:
1300:
1295:
1290:
1288:
1273:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1238:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1197:
1194:
1192:
1168:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1122:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1082:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1056:. Thank you.
1032:
1029:
1028:
1027:
992:
986:
985:
984:
942:
939:
938:
937:
897:
896:
888:
885:
884:
883:
882:
881:
880:
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
872:
871:
870:
869:
841:
840:
839:
838:
837:
836:
835:
834:
833:
832:
831:
830:
829:
828:
827:
826:
798:
797:
796:
795:
794:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
785:
762:
761:
760:
759:
758:
757:
756:
755:
754:
753:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
724:
723:
703:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
680:
679:
678:
677:
664:
663:
638:
635:
601:
598:
590:for any help.
577:
574:
566:. Thank you.
544:
538:
523:
520:
519:
518:
493:
490:
471:
468:
445:
442:
404:
401:
398:
397:
394:
393:
392:
391:
378:
369:
353:
352:
349:
346:
345:
344:
343:
329:
320:
311:
299:
298:
295:
292:
291:
290:
289:
276:
267:
258:
245:
233:
232:
229:
223:
220:
219:
218:
217:
204:
194:External links
191:
178:
164:
163:
162:
153:
147:Citing sources
140:
128:
127:
124:
121:
120:
119:
118:
113:
108:
100:
99:
96:
93:
92:
91:
90:
80:
68:
67:
64:
55:
54:
53:
50:
41:
38:
35:
34:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2138:
2129:
2128:
2124:
2120:
2116:
2112:
2107:
2105:
2101:
2097:
2096:
2079:
2075:
2074:
2070:
2066:
2062:
2061:
2056:
2051:
2049:
2045:
2041:
2037:
2033:
2028:
2025:
2024:
2015:
2006:
2004:
2003:
1999:
1995:
1991:
1987:
1983:
1979:
1975:
1971:
1967:
1963:
1954:
1951:
1948:
1944:
1936:
1935:
1931:
1927:
1923:
1915:
1913:
1912:
1908:
1904:
1899:
1897:
1893:
1888:
1885:
1883:
1878:
1876:
1869:
1859:
1850:
1848:
1845:directive to
1844:
1841:
1833:
1831:
1830:
1826:
1822:
1817:
1810:
1808:
1807:
1804:
1798:
1793:
1785:
1778:
1776:
1775:
1772:
1768:
1763:
1759:
1756:
1748:
1746:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1732:
1728:
1722:
1720:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1703:
1699:
1697:
1692:
1690:
1686:
1681:
1679:
1675:
1671:
1667:
1659:
1653:
1649:
1646:
1642:
1639:
1637:
1636:
1631:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1621:
1619:
1618:
1613:
1609:
1605:
1601:
1597:
1592:
1589:
1582:
1578:
1576:
1575:
1571:
1567:
1562:
1556:
1552:
1537:
1535:
1534:
1530:
1526:
1518:
1516:
1515:
1512:
1508:
1503:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1488:
1478:
1475:
1473:
1470:
1468:
1465:
1462:
1460:
1457:
1455:
1452:
1450:
1447:
1444:
1442:
1439:
1437:
1434:
1432:
1429:
1426:
1424:
1421:
1419:
1416:
1414:
1411:
1408:
1406:
1403:
1401:
1398:
1396:
1393:
1390:
1389:
1384:
1381:
1379:
1376:
1374:
1371:
1369:
1366:
1364:
1363:Hotaru Futaba
1361:
1359:
1356:
1354:
1351:
1349:
1346:
1344:
1341:
1339:
1336:
1334:
1331:
1329:
1326:
1324:
1321:
1319:
1316:
1314:
1311:
1309:
1306:
1304:
1301:
1299:
1296:
1294:
1291:
1289:
1286:
1285:
1283:
1280:
1278:
1271:
1267:
1264:
1259:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1249:
1244:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1195:
1193:
1190:
1189:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1139:
1134:
1129:
1121:Input request
1120:
1116:
1112:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1093:
1088:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1038:
1030:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1019:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1002:
998:
991:
988:Reporting at
987:
983:
979:
972:
968:
967:
966:
965:
962:
961:
956:
955:
954:
948:
940:
936:
932:
925:
921:
917:
913:
912:
911:
910:
907:
901:
894:
893:
892:
886:
868:
864:
857:
856:
855:
854:
853:
852:
851:
850:
849:
848:
847:
846:
845:
844:
843:
842:
823:
819:
814:
813:
812:
811:
810:
809:
808:
807:
806:
805:
804:
803:
802:
801:
800:
799:
784:
781:
776:
775:
774:
773:
772:
771:
770:
769:
768:
767:
766:
765:
764:
763:
752:
748:
740:
739:
738:
737:
736:
735:
734:
733:
732:
731:
722:
719:
715:
711:
710:
709:
708:
707:
706:
705:
704:
697:
693:
686:
685:
684:
683:
682:
681:
676:
673:
668:
667:
666:
665:
662:
658:
651:
650:
649:
648:
645:
636:
634:
633:
630:
624:
619:
615:
611:
607:
599:
597:
596:
593:
587:
586:
583:
575:
573:
572:
569:
565:
561:
557:
549:
543:
539:
537:
536:
533:
531:
530:
521:
517:
513:
506:
505:
504:
503:
500:
491:
489:
488:
485:
484:Photouploaded
481:
477:
469:
467:
465:
461:
457:
456:189.139.203.9
453:
443:
441:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
417:
414:
413:
410:
402:
390:
386:
382:
379:
377:
373:
370:
368:
364:
360:
357:
356:
355:
354:
350:Miscellaneous
348:
347:
342:
338:
334:
331:Cleaning up:
330:
328:
324:
321:
319:
315:
312:
310:
306:
303:
302:
301:
300:
294:
293:
288:
287:Mailing lists
284:
280:
277:
275:
271:
268:
266:
262:
259:
257:
253:
249:
246:
244:
240:
237:
236:
235:
234:
230:The Community
228:
227:
224:
216:
212:
208:
205:
203:
199:
195:
192:
190:
186:
182:
179:
177:
176:Sock puppetry
173:
169:
166:
165:
161:
157:
154:
152:
148:
144:
143:Verifiability
141:
139:
135:
132:
131:
130:
129:
123:
122:
117:
114:
112:
109:
107:
104:
103:
102:
101:
95:
94:
89:
85:
81:
79:
75:
72:
71:
70:
69:
63:
62:
59:
58:
51:
48:
44:
43:
39:
32:
28:
25:
18:
17:
2110:
2108:
2093:
2091:
2058:
2052:
2029:
2021:
2019:
1957:
1926:Ottawahitech
1919:
1900:
1889:
1886:
1879:
1874:
1851:
1842:
1837:
1818:
1814:
1789:
1771:Okeyes (WMF)
1764:
1760:
1752:
1736:Factseducado
1733:
1729:
1726:
1702:Please note:
1701:
1700:
1693:
1682:
1663:
1634:
1616:
1600:my talk page
1590:
1585:
1563:
1541:
1522:
1519:James Watson
1504:
1491:
1490:If you have
1489:
1485:
1373:Precognition
1275:
1240:
1208:James Watson
1199:
1191:
1170:
1166:VandalProof!
1124:
1090:
1084:
1034:
1031:Article move
1012:
994:
959:
952:
950:
944:
915:
902:
898:
890:
821:
672:199.71.183.2
644:199.71.183.2
640:
603:
588:
579:
553:
528:
525:
495:
473:
447:
415:
406:
389:User scripts
363:Disambiguity
296:Things to do
283:IRC channels
274:Village pump
97:Getting Help
46:
2060:voting page
1875:__NOINDEX__
1843:__NOINDEX__
1769:. Thanks!
1579:A note re:
1566:BCeagle0312
1564:Thank You,
1551:geraldckane
1427:Add Sources
1237:Word of God
1164:Welcome to
637:Creationism
450:—Preceding
444:Information
420:—Preceding
318:Peer review
84:edit a page
29:is busy in
2044:topic bans
1978:topic bans
1892:User:Diego
1834:a heads-up
1821:ScientifiC
1710:Erwin85Bot
1277:SuggestBot
1128:nominating
1046:"Move" tab
906:Harry Mudd
818:Flat Earth
606:talk pages
529:Levine2112
407:Hello. --
376:Talk pages
372:User pages
359:Categories
215:Notability
181:Copyrights
2040:site bans
1974:site bans
1901:Thanks!
1802:EarwigBot
1511:ForteTuba
1500:ForteTuba
1177:moderator
1106:Thanks —
1018:Ginkgo100
945:As shown
780:Gscshoyru
718:Gscshoyru
714:WP:WEASEL
618:Shift key
492:Rorschach
426:Slippycup
341:Vandalism
256:Etiquette
202:Vandalism
31:real life
2111:articles
1903:Geo Swan
1840:adding a
1666:deletion
1525:Koncorde
1492:feedback
1467:Facebook
1216:WP:LINKS
920:WP:POINT
582:Ward3001
568:Drumpler
560:deletion
522:Response
452:unsigned
434:contribs
422:unsigned
279:Signpost
252:Civility
185:Fair use
82:How to:
1391:Cleanup
1293:Gurukul
1009:warning
971:Twinkle
629:SineBot
403:Comment
333:General
1964:. The
1463:Expand
1445:Wikify
1220:WP:BLP
1133:Severa
1092:C.Fred
990:WP:AIV
953:Fyslee
614:tildes
2119:B-bot
1942:DIEGO
1863:or a
1676:and "
1409:Merge
1287:Stubs
1262:desat
1247:desat
1226:DIEGO
1153:DIEGO
1110:DIEGO
1070:DIEGO
1058:Kesac
1005:block
977:DIEGO
947:here,
930:DIEGO
862:DIEGO
822:might
746:DIEGO
691:DIEGO
656:DIEGO
511:DIEGO
409:Diego
385:Tools
367:Stubs
47:watch
27:Diego
2123:talk
2069:talk
2030:The
1998:talk
1930:talk
1907:talk
1849:.
1825:talk
1740:talk
1714:talk
1680:").
1635:xeno
1630:here
1617:xeno
1612:here
1608:here
1570:talk
1529:talk
1258:Core
1243:Core
1097:talk
960:talk
916:know
460:talk
430:talk
337:Spam
198:Spam
2106:).
1958:Hi,
1706:bot
1648:AfD
1542:Hi,
1138:!!!
1013:and
49:it.
2125:)
2071:)
2063:.
2042:,
2000:)
1976:,
1932:)
1924:.
1909:)
1871:}}
1865:{{
1861:}}
1855:{{
1827:)
1819:--
1742:)
1716:)
1572:)
1531:)
1183:.
1149:—
1141:)
1099:)
1016:--
957:/
627:--
462:)
436:)
432:•
387:•
383:•
374:•
365:•
361:•
339:•
335:•
325:•
316:•
307:•
285:•
281:•
272:•
263:•
254:•
250:•
241:•
213:•
209:•
200:•
196:•
187:•
183:•
174:•
170:•
158:•
149:•
145:•
136:•
86:•
76:•
2121:(
2088:⚠
2067:(
1996:(
1928:(
1905:(
1823:(
1795:"
1738:(
1712:(
1568:(
1527:(
1185:β
1135:(
1095:(
458:(
428:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.