1514:(Insert as direct reply to Fluffymoose:) True, but the results of your edits, and your refusal to accept consensus and overriding opinion, has resulted in widescale changes to dozens of (and most likely more) films. I'm not intentionally having a go at you here, but basically, it's all your fault. Nothing else previous has managed to impress upon you the importance of collaboration - perhaps the ramifications of your actions here will?
1128:
712:
230:
1196:
1635:
1600:
821:
653:
614:
501:
337:
87:
1832:
1671:
432:
23:
888:
570:
1044:, as consensus is clearly against you, yet you are refusing to accept this, and keep making the changes. You should by now be aware that edit warring does not have to exceed the three-revert rule to be considered edit warring. I'm not an admin (God forbid,) and I'm also not involved, just an observation.
863:
Yep, please take a breather. This is everyone's site, and if you are unable to self-manage your edits, and heed other people's opinions, and continue to think that you can impose your set of words, then we will need to impose our management. Talk pages are the place for discussion, please use them
796:
I see from your comments on the discussion page of HP7-2 that you are an avid buff of Harry Potter. Well, I am one too. But, we don't have to get ourselves blocked for only adding the word "universal". I truly understand your point but please next time don't edit without discussing...the article has
1107:
I have applied for the suspension of your editing privileges for the duration of the debate. With you being a new editor we have taken a fairly soft line until now, but your actions just aren't in accordance with how
Knowledge (XXG) works. I think it would be better if you sit this one out and let
1531:
I agree it is incredibly ironic, also tragic. You fought against the HP8 article and now because of you everything you fought against is happening everywhere. Sometimes things that are meant to be untouched are best kept so. The only way to revert the changes is to find a reliable source that uses
676:
They are not here to improve, they are pissing me off over using the phrase universal critical acclaim! So what if it says universal acclaim that's a really good thing and there was no need to change it! I don't understand why I'm getting into so much trouble when the other person isn't. He/she is
1347:
I swear I won't. From now on I'll just give helpful suggestions before I do any serious editing. The whole reason this bothers me more than anything is because awards (Academy Awards in particular) are coming up and I really hope Harry Potter 8 gets nominated. And the reason I think it should get
1370:
going on about how the article should include your pet phrase. That is not the way to get unblocked - and is indication to a reviewing admin that you have not learned any kind of lesson. There are millions of articles on
Knowledge (XXG), and the Harry Potter universe is but a handful. Find
1417:
which may also have an article or two to interest you. Finally, why not try to construct a reply that doesn't include a variation on "Harry Potter 8's critical reception" - we all know your opinion on this by now, and incessant repetition will just alienate you from those wishing to help.
989:
talk page are also fans of the series - why else would they watch the page? However, they all remain (for the most part) impartial. We have to comply with
Knowledge (XXG) standards so that the Harry Potter articles are the best they can be. Eventually we can bring the articles to
1724:
I just don't understand why they changed it again. They keep changing the consense for harry potter because it's supposedly "correct" and "neutral". But if your going to do that for harry potter why not do it for everything other "critically acclaimed" film on the site? It's not
515:, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert.
1388:
I promise you, I won't edit anything whatsoever. It just gets me frustrated because they change Harry Potter 8's critical reception but not any other film's???? That just doesn't make sense to me. And also, what could I edit so i could get some experience under my
915:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you.
597:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you.
939:
that all language be as neutral as possible: we editors are not here to force our own opinions in articles, but to create articles that present a multitude of opinions and facts so that readers can form their own opinions. I'd like to remind you that you must be
1562:
I can't believe you just wrote that. You still have no idea what you are responsible for - or rather you seem convinced that you are in the right and all this palaver is down to the actions of other editors. I seriously urge you to read
1582:
I know what I'm responsible for. The whole neutral reception thing. But i didn't think anyone was going to listen to me. And god, you say "responsible for" like some sort of universal crisis. It's just wikipedia for heaven's sake.
846:
on the talk page, and it is not neutral. Your beliefs about what the page should say are not more important than the wording that a group of editors has collectively decided is in the best interest of the article.
1064:. Your recent changes to the DH2 article clearly do not. Please consider your edits carefully. As for your statement that "It said universal critcal acclaim for the longest time", this is covered in great detail
956:, not merely offer our opinions on what other editors have said. You currently have not participated in the discussion except for to insult other editors, or repeat how "unfair" you think the change is.
1739:
Fluffy what did i tell about your edits. In
Knowledge (XXG), your edits must be supported by references in order to avoid blocks like those; use reliable articles and cite them. Don't make stuff up. --
1040:
Just because something has been in place doesn't mean that is has to stay. This is my only contribution to the discussion so far, however, I can see that my next contribution may be to report you to
1024:
Just tell me this, why did you guys change the critical reception in the first place? It said universal critcal acclaim for the longest time and then all of a sudden you decided to change it.....? (
1366:
Knowledge (XXG) used to say many things. A piece of advice from an editor who has had his own fair share of arguments (and lost most of them): Just give up. Even in your unblock request you are
998:
status. Having eventually reached those two statuses, the article will draw more attention and people will see how well it was received by critics, but it's important that people make their
1065:
986:
661:
206:
188:
66:
1109:
1041:
1849:
695:
691:
1532:
the words critical acclaim or praise in relation to any movie then you may change the "positive" to "acclaim" or "praise" or as quoted in the article that you have cited.--
1455:
Why has someone been changing all the critical receptions for everyone of the Harry Potter films? Particularly; Prisoner of
Azkaban, Goblet of Fire and Half-Blood Prince. (
1845:
1152:
833:
740:
626:
348:
250:
184:
98:
42:
316:
There's a discussio on the article talk page you should get involved with when this expires. Don't leap back into reverting the article or you'll be blocked for longer.
1436:. Specifically the part about not editing in contentious areas at first. Find a calmer area of Knowledge (XXG) that you have an interest in and work there.--v/r -
45:
appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this. Thank you.
1413:, where they could also offer advice on editing such articles. You must have seen films other than Harry Potter - why not try some of their articles? Perhaps
508:
455:
with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read
Knowledge (XXG)'s
436:
1337:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
1803:
Example of a reference. Put your reliable 3rd party source in here. Don't forget to add "==References==" and "{{Reflist}}" if they aren't already present.
985:
It's fine, just please try not to repeat that behaviour. I'd like to tell you that I'm sure all the people who participated in the discussion on the
1236:
549:
even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.
1002:
opinions about those reviews. Please try to participate in the discussion over at
Project Film: I'm sure you have good ideas, but you have to work
1303:
If so, maybe you better have a serious think about whether you can edit again without this happening. Perhaps you should edit some other topic? —
466:
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at
Knowledge (XXG)'s
65:
Since multiple editors have reverted your change, if you still think the article should be changed, you'll need to discuss it on the talk page,
1706:
1322:
1176:
776:
274:
1348:
nominated is because it recieved universal critical acclaim, according to critics and wikipedia (well, wikipedia used to say that anyway). (
209:. You have already been warned about edit warring, and it would be a shame to see you blocked over such an insignificant choice of words. --
1771:
Firstly, you have to succesfully appeal your block. Good luck with that. Then, when (if) you start editing again use the <ref: -->
911:
905:
593:
587:
1642:
1608:
829:
622:
38:
1231:
30:
744:
388:
280:
138:
1108:
the Film
Project decide what sort of terminology is permissable in the articles. If you want to argue your case you can do so at
906:
842:
Stop adding anything related to the film being "acclaimed" to the article: this is not the agreed upon wording that was discussed
588:
912:
594:
1604:
825:
618:
538:
460:
440:
400:
356:
288:
150:
106:
1690:
1160:
995:
760:
736:
657:
542:
404:
258:
154:
1496:
My edits were just for Harry Potter and the
Deathly Hallows Part 2, not the rest of the film series' critical reception.(
1410:
475:
1678:
1616:
1209:
1135:
935:
The neutral language that you keep calling "stupid" is the foundation upon which Knowledge (XXG) has been built. It is
837:
719:
636:
483:
410:
292:
237:
160:
1203:
1110:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Fluffymoose_reported_by_User:Betty_Logan_.28Result:_.29
452:
352:
102:
631:
1208:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
1841:
1820:
991:
1717:
1250:
1187:
1156:
534:
396:
368:
344:
254:
246:
146:
118:
94:
34:
26:
1371:
something else to edit, and in a couple of months, maybe come back with some more experience under your belt.
1479:
ironic that you are asking this question, as it has come about as a direct result of your own initial edits:
944:
when discussing with other editors, and not shrug off suggestions as "stupid" or "unfair," and most certainly
415:
1564:
896:
578:
1744:
1537:
1077:
870:
802:
949:
892:
574:
530:
479:
478:, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through
392:
360:
284:
142:
110:
1857:
1778:
1572:
1519:
1486:
1423:
1376:
1308:
1117:
1087:
Hey I only started it because somebody else decided to change the consensus first. So, don't blame me. (
1049:
1015:
961:
853:
554:
491:
1853:
1113:
1712:
1182:
702:
669:
643:
1433:
1144:
546:
456:
1624:
169:
57:
1546:
Hey, i only started it because somebody else decided to change the reception. So, don't blame me.(
214:
196:
941:
518:
363:
rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
113:
rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
1740:
1660:
1533:
1073:
921:
865:
798:
603:
1061:
526:
48:
1774:
1754:
1726:
1696:
1584:
1568:
1547:
1515:
1497:
1482:
1456:
1440:
1419:
1414:
1390:
1372:
1349:
1331:
1304:
1282:
1214:
1166:
1088:
1045:
1025:
1011:
971:
957:
849:
783:
766:
550:
487:
322:
301:
264:
76:
1069:
748:
512:
467:
699:
665:
640:
1686:
1148:
756:
752:
732:
728:
690:
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at
1773:
tags to add references. Adding references is basic stuff that you should understand.
1620:
1480:
786:
705:
444:
165:
52:
210:
192:
1656:
1612:
917:
599:
525:
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's
903:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
585:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
435:
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Knowledge (XXG), as you did at
1831:
1437:
780:
317:
296:
71:
1812:
References aren't normally used on talk pages, but I reckon this is acceptable.
1641:. You will be blocked from editing the next time you violate Knowledge (XXG)'s
1753:
I'm not making stuff up. And where do i go to provide my references as proof?(
187:
and would like to make you aware that I'm seeking consensus on the article on
1611:
by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at
832:
by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at
625:
by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to
664:. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Knowledge (XXG). —
378:; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
128:; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
1861:
1782:
1762:
1748:
1734:
1719:
1664:
1628:
1592:
1576:
1555:
1541:
1523:
1505:
1490:
1464:
1443:
1427:
1398:
1380:
1357:
1312:
1290:
1189:
1121:
1096:
1081:
1053:
1033:
1019:
979:
965:
925:
875:
857:
806:
673:
646:
607:
558:
495:
420:
331:
310:
218:
200:
173:
80:
59:
391:
to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents
141:
to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents
694:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
1652:
376:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made
126:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made
864:
and then we proceed with the consensus and neutral point of view. —
1281:
I promise i will not do it again. I just get frustrated that's all.
205:
Please don't keep re-adding "universal critical acclaim", engage on
37:
of Knowledge (XXG) is that articles should always be written from a
948:
call other editors "idiots." I'd also like to remind you that, per
900:
582:
1409:
Well, you seem to be interested in films, so why not head off to
895:
and Knowledge (XXG) pages that have open discussion, you should
577:
and Knowledge (XXG) pages that have open discussion, you should
1848:
for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with
529:
to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents
533:
among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant
387:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
137:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
1669:
1194:
1126:
710:
499:
335:
228:
85:
403:. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
153:. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
660:
in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on
287:. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
1319:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
751:. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek
1339:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
891:
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
573:
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
1647:
1472:
1264:
1260:
1254:
1245:
1241:
1227:
1223:
1219:
686:
Notice of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard
474:
Please ensure you are familiar with Knowledge (XXG)'s
1846:
Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/Fluffymoose
755:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
692:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
395:
among editors. You can post a request for help at an
291:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
145:
among editors. You can post a request for help at an
1202:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
1147:
in spite of consensus and engaging in a slow moving
541:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary
1840:Your name has been mentioned in connection with a
1155:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
662:Talk:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2
482:. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in
382:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
253:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
132:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
67:Talk:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2
459:page, and ask for independent help at one of the
517:Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a
1689:. If you would like to be unblocked, you may
1607:. If you continue to violate Knowledge (XXG)'s
828:. If you continue to violate Knowledge (XXG)'s
621:. If you continue to violate Knowledge (XXG)'s
349:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2
1159:. If you would like to be unblocked, you may
1153:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2
834:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2
759:. If you would like to be unblocked, you may
741:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2
627:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2
511:shows that you are in danger of breaking the
509:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 2
437:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 2
426:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 2
257:. If you would like to be unblocked, you may
251:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2
185:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2
179:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2
99:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2
43:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2
8:
743:. During a dispute, you should first try to
775:below this notice, but you should read the
1060:Edits to Knowledge (XXG) ought to reflect
347:according to the reverts you have made on
279:During a dispute, you should first try to
97:according to the reverts you have made on
343:You currently appear to be engaged in an
93:You currently appear to be engaged in an
369:Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on edit warring
119:Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on edit warring
1796:
183:I notice that you have recently edited
797:had a barrier spell--protego maxima.--
29:to Knowledge (XXG), and thank you for
468:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
7:
1475:, you'd understand why? It is also
677:participating in this edit war too!
407:. If you engage in an edit war, you
157:. If you engage in an edit war, you
696:User:Fluffymoose_disruptive_editing
1852:before editing the evidence page.
811:Protego maxima hahaha good one :)
14:
931:Your participation in discussions
451:If you are engaged in an article
1850:the guide to responding to cases
1830:
1633:
1598:
1411:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Film
910:
904:
886:
819:
651:
612:
592:
586:
568:
545:. You may still be blocked for
430:
21:
507:Your recent editing history at
47:Just a friendly reminder. Read
367:Please be particularly aware,
355:with others, to avoid editing
117:Please be particularly aware,
105:with others, to avoid editing
1:
1826:
1139:from editing for a period of
807:21:15, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
787:20:30, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
745:discuss controversial changes
706:19:54, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
674:19:44, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
647:19:38, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
608:15:36, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
559:00:57, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
496:00:50, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
421:21:45, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
332:13:17, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
311:13:17, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
281:discuss controversial changes
241:from editing for a period of
219:11:58, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
201:09:20, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
174:07:34, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
81:18:16, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
60:14:45, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
41:. A contribution you made to
1783:07:50, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
1763:06:05, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
1749:21:07, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
1735:04:58, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
1720:00:31, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
1665:21:37, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
1629:20:18, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
1609:neutral point of view policy
994:status, and then maybe even
830:neutral point of view policy
623:neutral point of view policy
1772:blah blah blah</ref: -->
1593:06:44, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
1577:18:30, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
1556:17:18, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
1542:16:55, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
1524:18:07, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
1506:15:57, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
1491:14:06, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
1465:09:36, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
1444:16:39, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
1428:08:04, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
1399:07:50, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
1381:07:01, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
1358:23:29, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
1313:23:19, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
1291:22:59, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
1206:, who declined the request.
1190:21:15, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
1122:21:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
1097:17:16, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
1082:21:18, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
1054:20:40, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
1034:19:11, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
1020:18:58, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
980:18:45, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
966:18:35, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
926:03:44, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
876:07:41, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
858:06:38, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
1877:
1862:04:23, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
1705:, but you should read the
1175:, but you should read the
1145:pushing your point of view
685:
484:loss of editing privileges
439:. Your edits appear to be
273:, but you should read the
1707:guide to appealing blocks
1639:This is your last warning
1323:guide to appealing blocks
1177:guide to appealing blocks
1157:make useful contributions
777:guide to appealing blocks
275:guide to appealing blocks
255:make useful contributions
1758:
1730:
1645:policy, as you did with
1588:
1551:
1501:
1471:Perhaps if you read the
1460:
1394:
1353:
1286:
1092:
1029:
987:Deathly Hallows - Part 2
975:
970:I'm sorry I apologize. (
361:try to reach a consensus
351:. Users are expected to
111:try to reach a consensus
101:. Users are expected to
476:policies and guidelines
397:appropriate noticeboard
147:appropriate noticeboard
1844:case. Please refer to
1674:
1199:
1131:
715:
504:
461:relevant notice boards
340:
233:
90:
1701:Your reason here ~~~~
1673:
1643:neutral point of view
1251:change block settings
1198:
1171:Your reason here ~~~~
1130:
1068:. Remember also that
792:A friendly discussion
771:Your reason here ~~~~
735:and violation of the
714:
503:
339:
269:Your reason here ~~~~
232:
89:
39:neutral point of view
1617:blocked from editing
1070:consensus can change
838:blocked from editing
637:blocked from editing
417:SarekOfVulcan (talk)
1693:by adding the text
1687:tendentious editing
1163:by adding the text
763:by adding the text
261:by adding the text
1675:
1605:disruptive editing
1200:
1132:
826:disruptive editing
753:dispute resolution
716:
619:disruptive editing
539:dispute resolution
505:
457:dispute resolution
401:dispute resolution
341:
289:dispute resolution
234:
151:dispute resolution
91:
31:your contributions
1838:
1837:
1691:appeal this block
1685:from editing for
1603:Please stop your
1161:appeal this block
882:Your recent edits
824:Please stop your
761:appeal this block
737:three-revert rule
723:from editing for
658:assume good faith
617:Please stop your
564:Your recent edits
513:three-revert rule
259:appeal this block
1868:
1834:
1827:
1813:
1810:
1804:
1801:
1716:
1704:
1672:
1650:
1637:
1636:
1602:
1601:
1415:Magic in fiction
1336:
1330:
1270:
1268:
1257:
1239:
1237:deleted contribs
1197:
1186:
1174:
1151:, as you did at
1129:
996:Featured Article
914:
908:
890:
889:
873:
823:
822:
774:
713:
655:
654:
634:
616:
615:
596:
590:
572:
571:
502:
434:
433:
418:
338:
329:
320:
308:
299:
272:
249:, as you did at
231:
88:
55:
25:
24:
1876:
1875:
1871:
1870:
1869:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1825:
1817:
1816:
1811:
1807:
1802:
1798:
1793:
1722:
1710:
1694:
1670:
1646:
1634:
1599:
1342:
1334:
1328:
1327:, then use the
1316:
1294:
1258:
1248:
1234:
1217:
1210:blocking policy
1195:
1192:
1180:
1164:
1127:
1105:
933:
899:by typing four
897:sign your posts
887:
884:
869:
820:
817:
794:
789:
764:
757:page protection
711:
698:. Thank you.
688:
683:
652:
630:
613:
581:by typing four
579:sign your posts
569:
566:
543:page protection
500:
453:content dispute
431:
428:
416:
405:page protection
336:
323:
318:
314:
302:
297:
293:page protection
262:
229:
226:
181:
155:page protection
86:
53:
22:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1874:
1872:
1836:
1835:
1824:
1818:
1815:
1814:
1805:
1795:
1794:
1792:
1789:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1676:You have been
1668:
1580:
1579:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1494:
1493:
1473:edit summaries
1453:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1317:
1301:
1297:Decline reason
1279:
1275:Request reason
1272:
1193:
1133:You have been
1125:
1104:
1101:
1085:
1084:
1057:
1056:
952:, we must all
932:
929:
883:
880:
879:
878:
816:
813:
793:
790:
717:You have been
709:
687:
684:
682:
679:
565:
562:
472:
471:
464:
443:and have been
427:
424:
385:
384:
379:
364:
235:You have been
227:
225:
222:
189:the talk page
180:
177:
135:
134:
129:
114:
84:
83:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1873:
1864:
1863:
1859:
1855:
1851:
1847:
1843:
1833:
1829:
1828:
1822:
1819:
1809:
1806:
1800:
1797:
1790:
1784:
1780:
1776:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1764:
1760:
1756:
1751:
1750:
1746:
1742:
1737:
1736:
1732:
1728:
1721:
1718:
1715:
1714:
1708:
1702:
1698:
1692:
1688:
1684:
1681:
1680:
1667:
1666:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1649:
1644:
1640:
1631:
1630:
1626:
1622:
1618:
1615:, you may be
1614:
1610:
1606:
1596:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1578:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1565:wp:competence
1561:
1560:
1559:
1557:
1553:
1549:
1544:
1543:
1539:
1535:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1507:
1503:
1499:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1481:
1478:
1474:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1466:
1462:
1458:
1445:
1442:
1439:
1435:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1416:
1412:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1369:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1359:
1355:
1351:
1345:
1341:
1340:
1333:
1326:
1324:
1315:
1314:
1310:
1306:
1300:
1298:
1293:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1278:
1276:
1271:
1266:
1262:
1256:
1252:
1247:
1243:
1238:
1233:
1229:
1228:global blocks
1225:
1224:active blocks
1221:
1216:
1211:
1207:
1205:
1204:administrator
1191:
1188:
1185:
1184:
1178:
1172:
1168:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1137:
1124:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1102:
1100:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1072:. Thank you.
1071:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1058:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1022:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
988:
983:
981:
977:
973:
968:
967:
963:
959:
955:
951:
947:
943:
938:
930:
928:
927:
923:
919:
913:
907:
902:
898:
894:
881:
877:
874:
872:
867:
862:
861:
860:
859:
855:
851:
848:
843:
839:
836:, you may be
835:
831:
827:
814:
812:
809:
808:
804:
800:
791:
788:
785:
782:
779:first. v/r -
778:
772:
768:
762:
758:
754:
750:
746:
742:
738:
734:
730:
726:
722:
721:
708:
707:
704:
701:
697:
693:
680:
678:
675:
671:
667:
663:
659:
649:
648:
645:
642:
638:
635:, you may be
633:
628:
624:
620:
610:
609:
605:
601:
595:
589:
584:
580:
576:
563:
561:
560:
556:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
523:
522:
520:
514:
510:
498:
497:
493:
489:
486:. Thank you.
485:
481:
477:
469:
465:
462:
458:
454:
450:
449:
448:
446:
442:
438:
425:
423:
422:
419:
414:
413:from editing.
412:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
383:
380:
377:
374:
373:
372:
370:
365:
362:
358:
354:
350:
346:
334:
333:
330:
328:
327:
321:
313:
312:
309:
307:
306:
300:
294:
290:
286:
282:
276:
270:
266:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
239:
223:
221:
220:
216:
212:
208:
207:the talk page
203:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
178:
176:
175:
171:
167:
164:
163:from editing.
162:
156:
152:
148:
144:
140:
133:
130:
127:
124:
123:
122:
120:
115:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
82:
78:
74:
73:
68:
64:
63:
62:
61:
58:
56:
51:
50:
44:
40:
36:
35:core policies
33:. One of the
32:
28:
17:December 2011
16:
1842:sockpuppetry
1839:
1821:Sockpuppetry
1808:
1799:
1752:
1741:Eddyghazaley
1738:
1723:
1711:
1700:
1683:indefinitely
1682:
1677:
1638:
1632:
1613:Harry Potter
1597:
1581:
1545:
1534:Eddyghazaley
1530:
1495:
1476:
1454:
1387:
1367:
1346:
1343:
1338:
1320:
1318:
1302:
1296:
1295:
1280:
1274:
1273:
1246:creation log
1213:
1201:
1181:
1170:
1140:
1134:
1106:
1086:
1074:Longwayround
1023:
1010:us. Thanks.
1007:
1003:
999:
992:Good Article
984:
969:
953:
950:wp:consensus
945:
936:
934:
885:
868:
866:billinghurst
845:
841:
818:
815:January 2012
810:
799:Eddyghazaley
795:
770:
733:edit warring
724:
718:
689:
650:
611:
567:
547:edit warring
524:
516:
506:
473:
447:or removed.
429:
408:
386:
381:
375:
366:
357:disruptively
342:
325:
324:
315:
304:
303:
278:
268:
247:edit warring
242:
236:
204:
182:
158:
136:
131:
125:
116:
107:disruptively
92:
70:
46:
20:
1854:Betty Logan
1775:a_man_alone
1755:Fluffymoose
1727:Fluffymoose
1585:Fluffymoose
1569:a_man_alone
1548:Fluffymoose
1516:a_man_alone
1498:Fluffymoose
1483:a_man_alone
1457:Fluffymoose
1420:a_man_alone
1391:Fluffymoose
1373:a_man_alone
1350:Fluffymoose
1305:Daniel Case
1283:Fluffymoose
1215:Fluffymoose
1114:Betty Logan
1089:Fluffymoose
1046:a_man_alone
1026:Fluffymoose
1012:Murmuration
972:Fluffymoose
958:Murmuration
850:Murmuration
551:Murmuration
535:noticeboard
488:Murmuration
353:collaborate
103:collaborate
1791:References
1477:incredibly
1434:WP:The End
1242:filter log
1103:ANI report
893:talk pages
731:caused by
729:disruption
666:Tom Morris
575:talk pages
441:disruptive
1648:this edit
1621:Elizium23
1321:read the
1261:checkuser
1220:block log
1062:consensus
937:essential
844:at length
749:consensus
747:and seek
727:for your
632:this edit
531:consensus
527:talk page
480:consensus
393:consensus
389:talk page
371:states:
359:, and to
285:consensus
283:and seek
166:Elizium23
143:consensus
139:talk page
121:states:
109:, and to
1699:|reason=
1232:contribs
1169:|reason=
1149:edit war
1006:us, not
769:|reason=
725:48 hours
537:or seek
445:reverted
399:or seek
345:edit war
267:|reason=
211:Mrmatiko
193:Mrmatiko
149:or seek
95:edit war
1725:fair.--
1709:first.
1697:unblock
1679:blocked
1657:Tgeairn
1653:Shrek 2
1332:unblock
1255:unblock
1179:first.
1167:unblock
1136:blocked
1008:against
954:discuss
918:SineBot
871:sDrewth
767:unblock
720:blocked
656:Please
600:SineBot
411:blocked
409:may be
265:unblock
243:3 hours
238:blocked
224:Blocked
161:blocked
159:may be
49:WP:NPOV
27:Welcome
1713:Salvio
1389:belt?(
1183:Salvio
1141:9 days
901:tildes
700:Calabe
681:Notice
641:Calabe
583:tildes
277:first.
72:C.Fred
1432:Read
1368:still
1325:first
942:civil
629:with
519:block
1858:talk
1823:case
1779:talk
1759:talk
1745:talk
1731:talk
1661:talk
1625:talk
1589:talk
1573:talk
1552:talk
1538:talk
1520:talk
1502:talk
1487:talk
1461:talk
1424:talk
1395:talk
1377:talk
1354:talk
1309:talk
1287:talk
1143:for
1118:talk
1093:talk
1078:talk
1066:here
1050:talk
1030:talk
1016:talk
1004:with
976:talk
962:talk
922:talk
854:talk
803:talk
703:1992
670:talk
644:1992
604:talk
555:talk
492:talk
245:for
215:talk
197:talk
191:. --
170:talk
77:talk
1655:.
1651:to
1619:.
1567:.
1558:).
1265:log
1212:).
1042:ANE
1000:own
946:not
909:or
840:.
739:at
591:or
319:Ged
298:Ged
69:. —
54:JOJ
1860:)
1781:)
1765:)
1761:)
1747:)
1733:)
1703:}}
1695:{{
1663:)
1627:)
1595:)
1591:)
1575:)
1554:)
1540:)
1522:)
1508:)
1504:)
1489:)
1467:)
1463:)
1426:)
1401:)
1397:)
1379:)
1360:)
1356:)
1344:,
1335:}}
1329:{{
1311:)
1299::
1289:)
1277::
1259:•
1253:•
1249:•
1244:•
1240:•
1235:•
1230:•
1226:•
1222:•
1173:}}
1165:{{
1120:)
1112:.
1099:)
1095:)
1080:)
1052:)
1036:)
1032:)
1018:)
982:)
978:)
964:)
924:)
916:--
856:)
805:)
773:}}
765:{{
672:)
639:.
606:)
598:--
557:)
494:)
326:UK
305:UK
295:.
271:}}
263:{{
217:)
199:)
172:)
79:)
1856:(
1777:(
1757:(
1743:(
1729:(
1659:(
1623:(
1587:(
1583:(
1571:(
1550:(
1536:(
1518:(
1500:(
1485:(
1459:(
1441:P
1438:T
1422:(
1393:(
1375:(
1352:(
1307:(
1285:(
1269:)
1267:)
1263:(
1218:(
1116:(
1091:(
1076:(
1048:(
1028:(
1014:(
974:(
960:(
920:(
852:(
801:(
784:P
781:T
668:(
602:(
553:(
521:.
490:(
470:.
463:.
213:(
195:(
168:(
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.