Knowledge (XXG)

This is an archive of past discussions with FriyMan. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2 >

All Pages:

1 -  2 -  ... (up to 100)

Hello, FriyMan, and welcome to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Kubinka. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Knowledge (XXG)
• The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Knowledge (XXG) Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Knowledge (XXG). You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Knowledge (XXG):Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:43, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Thank you User:MSGJ --FriyMan (talk) 13:22, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi FriyMan! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Knowledge (XXG) Adventure Start Page
• The Knowledge (XXG) Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Knowledge (XXG) Help pages

-- 13:11, Thursday, December 8, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

...or other obnoxious editing. Please see wp:vandalism. Generally, editors should be warned four times before reporting to WP:AIV. Warning usually are made with wp:templates. i.e. "templating". See WP:WARNING for a list of templates. When especially egregious, one can use {{uw-vand4im}} {{subst:uw-vand4im|*article name*}} I usually reserve this for additions of objectionable images or text - very racist, overt sexual images, etc. Note that there is a clear distinction between vandalism and wp:content disputes, and other wp:disruptive editing. Be sure not to confuse the two! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 11:05, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

HI, the article is translated now. I do apologize for not commenting when I removed the tag. I've commented many times during the translation process. That's all I have done - translated. I will make sure it's done properly next time.

Thanks Petr Talasek — Preceding unsigned comment added by Petr Talasek (talk • contribs) 11:39, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Petr Talasek, thank you! Please remember to always mark your changes. FriyMan (talk) 11:42, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi FriyMan. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! -- Samtar 12:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Thanks for accepting my edit about the Ed Sheeran Stratocasters. Best Wishes ArtWriter1 ArtWriter1 (talk) 19:24, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! FriyMan (talk) 19:07, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for bringing the ugly state of my User page to my attention. It was actually an attempt to paste in an image i had converted to ASCII art. I've put up a temporary user page now. In a few days I'll have one that looks nice. Hope you understand! Arkhaminsanity (talk) 07:50, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Good job! Review WP:UP more. FriyMan 09:14, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello FriyMan, I hope that I'm doing this procedure correctly. My page was flagged for a speedy deletion because the subject was not deemed important enough. I'd included external links to IMDb credits and an official discography listing from AllMusic (amongst others). I'm not certain what else is required to prove legitimacy, relevance, or importance. Please let me know so I can fix it. Thanks! Cartoonhotdog (talk) 08:56, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Even though your RfA won't go well, I want to thank you for your edits so far. We always need more vandalism patrollers, and it looks like you're doing a pretty good job at that. AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 12:30, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Adminship isn't everything - you're doing great work already! Keep it up and feel free to drop by any time -- Samtar 12:50, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Greetings, I'm Exemplo347. I've noticed that you have been making a large number of edits in rapid succession - 24 in 2 minutes - and I'd like to know how? Are you using a bot? I'm curious. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 09:47, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Good morning, Exemplo347! I made 24 edits in 2 minutes, because I am using Huggle, a semi-automatic tool and one of its options is automatically welcoming users. FriyMan 09:52, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

That may be one of its options, but you should really be using Huggle sparingly. It is not intended to be used to perform that many edits in rapid succession. I've never seen that many edits appear in the New User Edits watchlist in such a short time - are you taking time to verify each of your edits before they are posted? I don't see how you could be. Exemplo347 (talk) 09:55, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

I am taking my time to verify each of my edits. Do not worry, I do not revert without a reason. Since most of the edits I do are welcome messages to IP users, encouraging to create an account, I do not believe that it is a problem. FriyMan 10:28, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

• From WP:HG: It is a diff browser intended for dealing with vandalism and other unconstructive edits (my italics). O Fortuna! 10:31, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Ok, I accept. I might have been wrong here and my theory is that this automatic welcome message could have been a symptom of mixing Twinkle and Huggle. I swear that I did not develop any software doing this automatically. FriyMan 10:34, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Also, how will you explain this? 12:44, 17 January 2017 (diff | hist) . . (+7,163)‎ . . N User talk:Rajender Kashyap ‎ (Welcoming user (HG) (3.1.20)) (current) (Tag: Huggle) - FriyMan 10:48, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

At least one of your Automated welcomes has been posted on the page of a user who has been here for 10 years - User talk:Realblade - and TexTucker has been here since July 2016 so I question the validity of whatever process you are using to select and welcome "new users". I see that after this issue was raised with you, you went on to do the exact same thing again in two more large batches, again so rapidly that it is not humanly possible for you to have individually checked each message to make sure it was appropriate for each user - unless you're about to tell me that you were able to perform these checks in less than 6 seconds, because at 11:44 you posted 10 messages. Exemplo347 (talk) 13:26, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Dear Exemplo347, I myself do not know what is happening. Every time I enter Huggle and browse through edits it keeps on welcoming users every time I see their edits. I have checked huggle settings, there isn't any info about it. However I definetly have proof that this is Huggle. 2:44, 17 January 2017 (diff | hist) . . (+7,163)‎ . . N User talk:Rajender Kashyap ‎ (Welcoming user (HG) (3.1.20)) (current) (Tag: Huggle) Could you please suggest a way to fix this? FriyMan 15:28, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

My immediate solution is that you should disable Huggle and ask for answers at the Helpdesk. You are responsible for the edits Huggle makes, even if you don't intend for them to happen, so the most sensible course of action is to stop using Huggle until you can work out what is going wrong. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 15:30, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

You are right. I will stop using huggle until there will be a solution to this problem. FriyMan 15:34, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

I think it's best until you know what's happening, it's never a good thing when you don't know what posts you're making and why. Good luck with your future editing! Exemplo347 (talk) 15:41, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

I found an alternative. I am now using STiki, since it is almost identical with Huggle. FriyMan 21:10, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

You could ask at WP:VPT.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:31, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello! I've been on Knowledge (XXG) for a while now and I want to take part in anti-vandal activities. I'm really confuses about how to go about this. The CVU page confused me further. I would be greatly appreciative of you would lend me some tips to help make this a better place. Arkhaminsanity (talk) 14:22, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

@Arkhaminsanity:, You might not believe me but I am also learning to teach people. We can start the course at about 11:15 UTC tomorrow. I will guide where to go through my talk page. I will make a new section of my own talk page especially for your education. Is this good? FriyMan 19:18, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Dear FriyMan, many thanks for the big cat earlier  :)

Now- may I ask, how are you learning to teach people? -and do you think this is the time to be doing so? Most of us here- many far longer than me- are still learning ourselves. Remember: Every Teacher Is A Learner. Cheers, O Fortuna! 19:31, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Dear @Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: I am learning by talking to students. I am learning about the best ways to communicate with others and make it fun for students to learn. I believe that it is very important to make learning fun and interesting. FriyMan 19:36, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

FriyMan, I think what Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi is saying is that you are too new and don't have the experience needed to teach people yet. The issue with Huggle and your RfA confirm this. I didn't start teaching people until this month, and I've been on Knowledge (XXG) for 9 months, and I have over 10,000 edits, over 4,000 of them are antivandalism. You need more training yourself before you are able to train people. I'm sure you'll be a fantastic teacher, just wait for a few months. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 21:16, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

ThePlatypuofDoom, thanks for wise mens advice. However I might just try my best and see if I can be a good teacher or not. FriyMan 21:21, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Okay, I'll put it bluntly. You are far too new to teach people in the CVUA. Don't do it. Wait for a few months. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 21:25, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Fine, maybe than someone else will teach him. If you would like too, maybe you should try. Clearly new users have no authoritah on Knowledge (XXG). FriyMan 21:33, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Very few people have authority on Knowledge (XXG) (the community as a whole does), but users are expected to have a level of skill and experience to instruct new editors, and you are not at that level yet. You'll get there in a few months. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 23:24, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Erm, is anyone willing to help me out? i truly want to help, but seems like this isn't going anywhere -Arkhaminsanity (talk) 14:56, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Dear @Arkhaminsanity:, you should probably ask more experinced editors on the WP:CVUA page. Sadly I am not one of them. I myself tried to find a mentor there, but it looks like they are too busy. :-( FriyMan 19:26, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello, FriyMan, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Knowledge (XXG) Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Knowledge (XXG) with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Ugog Nizdast (talk) 19:10, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

FriyMan https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Cabinet_of_Donald_Trump&diff=762097176&oldid=762037759 It is clearly biased, and has gotten me into trouble. L3X1 Complaints Desk 16:58, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

@L3X1:, I am very sorry. I did not take my time looking into this edit too much. I was in a hurry and I will take my time reviewing changes more carefully. How exactly did you get in trouble? FriyMan 19:38, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

FriyMan Thanks. The "trouble" was merely that I had to spend more time researching the diff. L3X1 Complaints Desk 19:53, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

@L3X1: I assure you, this won't happen again. FriyMan 19:56, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Hiranandani Foundation School, Powai. On reading through its clear that the page has been made by someone from the school. The description of the uniforms gives that away. What action is appropriate and should i investigate further? Arkhaminsanity (talk) 12:18, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

HI @Arkhaminsanity:! I believe that the part about uniform is not an as. However, the part about IB system looks like advertisement a lot. Please take your time to investigate it. Good job by the way. FriyMan 12:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

My investigation leads me here ->Lovely Professional University. I don't know if its my editing fatigue, but so much here seems promotional. What is your opinion bout this? (Have a look at the placements section) Arkhaminsanity (talk) 15:38, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

I guess you can edit the article and remove all advertisement, you can find. Try report the editor, who made wrote this advertisement. FriyMan 16:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Just wanted to let you know that you haven't worked on your CVUA course in a little while. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 16:00, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

this article should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.243.189.211 (talk) 14:15, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

@77.243.189.211: Thank you! This article doesn't have enough sources to be considered notable. I strongly encourage you to create an account, to make it easier to communicate. We strongly admire your work. Thank you, 77.243.189.211 FriyMan 17:04, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

delete techofus atricle pls — Preceding unsigned comment added by Digisky (talk • contribs) 17:28, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

@Digisky: I tagged the article for deletion, because you asked for it. It will be deleted soon. FriyMan 17:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For graduating in the CVUA! ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 22:25, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello FriyMan. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

• URGENT: Please consider helping get the huge backlog (around 15,000 pages) down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
• Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
• Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
• Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. -- Samtar 14:51, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

• I personally would not have granted you this right yet, but the decision rests on admin discretion. Nevertheless, now that you have it, please find time to use it and help clear the backlog rather than continue to concern yourself with admin matters. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:01, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello FriyMan, I hope that I'm doing this procedure correctly. My page was flagged for a speedy deletion because the subject was not deemed important enough. I'd included external links to IMDb credits and an official discography listing from AllMusic (amongst others). I'm not certain what else is required to prove legitimacy, relevance, or importance. Please let me know so I can fix it. Thanks! Cartoonhotdog (talk) 08:56, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Cartoonhotdog! Your article is good to go now. If it has sources, it is notable and therefore should not be deleted. To help you, I would like you to play through the The Knowledge (XXG) Adventure. It is a tutorial, that wil help you understand the basics of the Wiki. Cheers, FriyMan 09:01, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Actually, I deleted it. It really isn't notable. The refs are just twitter and facebook and such. The name really doesn't google. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:06, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Anna Frodesiak Well, I guess I was right in the first place... FriyMan 09:10, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

I hope so. :) Cartoonhotdog, you are very welcome here, and I am sorry about the deletion. The thing is, WP:GNG. Please read it and you will understand. Also, you are welcome here provided that you do not promote others or yourself. If you are here to write about someone else, and are being paid to do so, please read WP:PAID. Best wishes to all. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:13, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

It is unfortunate that the references of IMDb and AllMusic had gone noticed. The Twitter ref was a citation for a particular statement and the Facebook ref was listed as an external link for an official page at the bottom. I certainly would not use Knowledge (XXG) as a promotional tool, but rather as a historical and referential outlet. Cartoonhotdog (talk) 09:27, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your time editing the article. I have spent a number of hours working through the issues you have a believe I have resolved the following:

• Corrected the dead links. In some cases I updated, in some replaced and in one or two removed as defunct and no longer required.
• Reformatted the Strength of British Army table to make it easier to read
• Expanded the History section so that it made more sense and stopped at more natural point
• Moved some photos to improve the layout
• Edited down the Structure and Formations. After some thought I simplified this section and removed some detail that was better covered in dedicated articles. The result is a slimmed down and more effective section that still gets the message across

I hope that this addressed your concerns. I will re-nominate the article for GA status and would appreciate it if you would repeat you assessment (as you already are read into the subject). I would also appreciate that if you find anything that would still make it fail that you place that onto the talk page and give me time to fix before failing the whole article. Many Thanks - Stingray Trainer (talk) 23:15, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Good job Stingray Trainer! I am sorry for not notifying you about my concerns before failing the article. I will be happy to review the article again. You've really put a lot of time into this article. I believe, that now this article is perfectly ready to become a GA. Thank you for putting time into this article. Cheers, FriyMan 06:53, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

I have re-nominated the article for GA status. Many thanks. Stingray Trainer (talk) 08:38, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for the second review. I will do my best to keep monitoring the page and keep the status. Many Thanks. Stingray Trainer (talk) 19:43, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks to your incompetence, a lot of editors have had to take time out to clear up your mess. I know what you are trying to do- but you can't. If the material needs to be removed, an administrator will delete it. Your continual refactoring of my talk page is nothing but rude and offensive. I have read the email you sent sent me; there is nothing in it that makes me think this conversation should not be held here. I assumed your original idea was merely thoughtless; I hope that's all it was. Thank you. — O Fortuna!

I am sorry for the mess, I did not mean to make it. I did not mean to offend you in any way. Cheers, FriyMan 12:16, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

I apologise for my outburst, Friyman- obviously you didn't mean any harm, none has really been done. Take care, — O Fortuna! 14:53, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

No problem! I was not offended. Thank you for advice! Cheers, FriyMan 15:01, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dutchophobia. Since you had some involvement with the Dutchophobia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. : Noyster (talk), 11:38, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi! As a WP:SPI Clerk, I am officially asking you to cease patrolling or posting to SPI pages (other than to open a case or present evidence) (see WP:SPI/PROC#Patrolling). Your comments at several SPI pages are confusing and unhelpful. We hace SPI clerks and wp:checkusers who are experienced in dealing with sockpuppets. The process is a bit backlogged, I know, but it's better to wait more than to handle cases badly. Thanks for understanding. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:41, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

I am sorry Vanjagenije, I just wanted to help. --Cheers, FriyMan 15:00, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

FriyMan, your review at Talk:Romania/GA6 was reversed today, and the article failed by Ritchie333. Indeed, I don't see how anyone could pass an article with so many "citation needed" templates: that alone is grounds for a quickfail, not a quick pass. I've noticed elsewhere on this page that you seem to not do your best work when dealing with certain Knowledge (XXG) processes: this review, and your other ones, are evidence that you do not understand the GA review process, which also includes the GA criteria and how to apply them.

I would like to suggest that you not do any further reviews at GAN for quite a while; indeed, I'd like to suggest that you gain some experience from the other side: getting your own articles to the point where they meet the criteria and are ready to be nominated, and then see what issues the reviewer brings up and what you need to do to fix them. Best of luck in your other Knowledge (XXG) endeavors. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:51, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello, BlueMoonset. In fact, I was already trying to bring few articles to GA state. But as you probably understand, requests for GA review and Peer review are usually started month after the initial nomination. If you are willing to help me out, could you please give me a few tips and peer review Spitzer Space Telescope? Cheers, FriyMan 20:07, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

I have put together a first draft of a counter proposal here, and you are more than welcome to comment and provide input. TimothyJosephWood 23:46, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

17.5% isn't that bad for an AfD record. It's not very good, but if you are accurate at least 70% of the time, it's not a big issue. 13% of my !votes didn't match consensus. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 12:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello FriyMan. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Alan Abel of the Philadelphia Orchestra, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims importance/significance of the subject. Thank you. SoWhy 06:52, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

All right, I will PROD the page. Single source it has is dead. Cheers, FriyMan 06:56, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Please, be a bit more careful. The single source was only dead because the creator accidentally added it in front of the References' section wikimarkup. Prematurely nominating articles for deletion without considering the alternatives (cf. WP:ATD, WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM) can be considered BITEy and might drive new editors from the project. Regards SoWhy 07:14, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2017 spb metro.jpg, has been listed at Knowledge (XXG):Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. –Davey2010 20:01, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on File:2017 spb metro.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 20:09, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Whpq, I will not even bother contesting... The WP:NFC is too confusing for me. Cheers, FriyMan 20:16, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

There may be other images we can use. Possible sources are Flickr and Panoramio. Take a look and see what you can come up with. Let me know if you find anything and I'll sort the upload. Mjroots (talk) 09:43, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Mjroots, One of my siblings was in Saint Petersburg when the attack happened, I have a photo of soldiers marching down the streets in the city. Would this photo be relevant? Cheers, FriyMan 10:39, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

I think under 'Reactions', perhaps, that would be an excellent addition to the article. — O Fortuna! 11:39, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi. I put the image onto the article. Cheers, FriyMan 12:28, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Я видел группы курсантов в Санкт-Петербурге и в дни, когда никаких терактов не было. Так что непонятно, при чём тут это фото; тем более, сделанное вдалеке от места теракта. Хоббит (talk) 20:38, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Хоббит, Простите за задержку, я считаю что это надо обсудить с другими участниками с помощью опроса. Cheers, FriyMan 18:23, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:20, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you Gerda Arendt! I was not expecting to receive this award and this is heart-warming. Thank you again. Cheers, FriyMan 13:26, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi there. You might be interested to know that Alan Abel (musician), an article you tagged for A7 speedy deletion, has appeared on yesterday's Main Page as part of Knowledge (XXG):Did you know?. I'm not telling you to berate you or to make you feel bad, I just wanted to take the time to point out that oftentimes articles that are tagged prematurely can turn out to be about notable subjects after a little bit of research (or just using Google News/Books). Rescuing such article attempts is not as easy as "drive-by" taggings for deletion but in the long run it's in the project's best interest to have articles about notable people and not scare off editors who create them less-than-perfectly. It took me a while to arrive at this conclusion myself back in my "younger" days so I thought you might appreciate the heads up. Regards SoWhy 18:39, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Well, I added a few categories to it, SoWhy. But overall, Where is the clinic? I have a strong case of deletionitis! Cheers, FriyMan 05:30, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Deletionitis can be cured by a healthy dose of jumping into own of the maintenance categories and improving some articles. Might I suggest Category:All unreferenced BLPs? Regards SoWhy 06:32, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Sure, I will take a look. Thanks. Cheers, FriyMan 07:31, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

16:40, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

No need to tag it three times for deletion; once is enough. Now they have three messages all saying the same thing which could come across as WP:BITEY. Just an FYI. — O Fortuna 10:06, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi! All of this is due to my stupidity. First, I tagged the article with G11, then I realised, that it was A11. Later, the user deleted the CSD template and I repeated my mistakes again. Sorry. Cheers, FriyMan 10:46, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

As well as that,  Self-trout. Cheers, FriyMan 11:11, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

19:50, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2017).

Administrator changes

Karanacs • Berean Hunter • GoldenRing • Dlohcierekim

Gdr • Tyrenius • JYolkowski • Longhair • Master Thief Garrett • Aaron Brenneman • Laser brain • JzG • Dragons flight

Guideline and policy news

• An RfC has clarified that user categories should be emptied upon deletion, but redlinked user categories should not be removed if re-added by the user.
• Discussions are ongoing regarding proposed changes to the COI policy. Changes so far have included clarification that adding a link on a Knowledge (XXG) forum to a job posting is not a violation of the harassment policy.

Technical news

• You can now see a list of all autoblocks at Special:AutoblockList.
• There is a new tool for adding archives to dead links. Administrators are able to restrict other user's ability to use the tool, and have additional permissions when changing URL and domain data.
• Administrators, bureaucrats and stewards can now set an expiry date when granting user rights. (discuss, permalink)

Miscellaneous

• Following an RfC, the editing restrictions page is now split into a list of active restrictions and an archive of those that are old or on inactive accounts. Make sure to check both pages if searching for a restriction.

---

Hello FriyMan. Barring some miracle, it seems that that RfA is destined for failure, so is it really necessary to add your "gotcha" question there? It is certainly within your rights to ask it, but it doesn't seem to be a very nice thing to do at this time. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:44, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Well, I am sorry, DoRD. Sadly I do not have telepathic abilities and I did not recognise the fact that this RfA is deemed for failure. I asked it, to clarify if the user had any hopes of contributing to UAA in the future. Once again, sorry. Cheers, FriyMan 13:33, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Even after chosing to be only the second strong oppose in 43 !votes? At least in your edit summary you admit it's not even your own question, I suppose. I think it was- over all- unnecessary. — O Fortuna 13:55, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

• I have to agree with the comments here, FriyMan. In fact that question is a fairly new trend and one that has been adopted as a workaround to the limitation on questions that was made in the RfA reform of Dec 2015 (multiple part questions masquerading as a single question). For some odd reason, that particular question often appears to be posed by new, or relatively new users. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:49, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, Kudpung. I am no expert in RfA, but I thought that this question was a common question during RfA processes. I saw multiple people using it in different RfAs and decided to put it in. Sorry. Cheers, FriyMan 05:48, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

OK, but the best solution is not to ask any questions at RfA at all. The RfA process is branded as the worst thing about the entire Knowledge (XXG) and the question section is one of the root causes of it and what puts good people off from running for adminship. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:02, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

I guess you are right, Kudpung. RfA is obviously a metaphorical D-day for the editors willing to take the job. I guess questions are just making it worse. Cheers, FriyMan 11:02, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

02:25, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

You asked on #wikimedia-labs (people were probably idling on the channel at the time):

 <FriyMan> Hey. I can't load login.tools.wmflabs.org on chrome. Can someone help?

login.tools.wmflabs.org is a bastion host, not a web host. You're supposed to connect to it via a tool using SSH protocol, not with Chrome using HTTP protocol. Please see the help Section for OpenSSH or PuTTY if you are on Windows. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 09:13, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Well Zhuyifei1999, as I am not a professional computer scientist, so could you please explain step-by-step for me? By the way, I already have a public SSH key, which I generated through openSSH on mac os x. What do I do next? Cheers, FriyMan 09:25, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

I just saw you asked about getting permission denied. Have you uploaded your key? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 10:27, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

BTW: Staying on connected to IRC for a bit longer will help, even if you idle, so it's easier to leave a message. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 10:32, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Yes, Zhuyifei1999, I managed to upload my SSH key. (Sorry for taking so much time.) Cheers, FriyMan 10:41, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

And does ssh after uploading work? If not, what does $ ssh -vvv login.tools.wmflabs.org show? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 11:58, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Zhuyife1999, I managed to connect. Thank you. Cheers, FriyMan 05:48, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank you very much! It is very nice of you to remember of such an event in history of my country. Thank you. Cheers, FriyMan 05:47, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Well: You won the war for the allies. That's a historical fact that is very much overlooked nowadays. Take care! — O Fortuna 10:08, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

21:48, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

22:18, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi FriyMan. I noticed that with this edit to the next admin newsletter (to be delivered in a few days), you added an entry about adding a "researcher" permission to the admin toolset. Do you think you could provide a link that clarifies what this means? Viewing deleted pages is already a part of the admin toolset, and at the moment, administrators are unable to grant the "researcher" permission. Mz7 (talk) 06:18, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Second this, as I haven't heard about this anywhere else. – Train2104 (t • c) 14:46, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Alright, absent clarification on the above, I've gone ahead and removed it from June's newsletter. Please let us know if you have any additional details about this. Mz7 (talk) 17:14, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

12:18, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2017).

Administrator changes

Doug Bell • Dennis Brown • Clpo13 • ONUnicorn

ThaddeusB • Yandman • Bjarki S • OldakQuill • Shyam • Jondel • Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

• An RfC proposing an off-wiki LTA database has been closed. The proposal was broadly supported, with further discussion required regarding what to do with the existing LTA database and defining access requirements. Such a tool/database formed part of the Community health initiative's successful grant proposal.
• Some clarifications have been made to the community banning and unblocking policies that effectively sync them with current practice. Specifically, the community has reached a consensus that when blocking a user at WP:AN or WP:ANI, it is considered a "community sanction", and administrators cannot unblock unilaterally if the user has not successfully appealed the sanction to the community.
• An RfC regarding the bot policy has closed with changes to the section describing restrictions on cosmetic changes.

Technical news

• Users will soon be able to blacklist specific users from sending them notifications.

Miscellaneous

• Following the 2017 elections, the new members of the Board of Trustees include Raystorm, Pundit and Doc James. They will serve three-year terms.

---

19:05, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

15:30, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

15:44, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

15:38, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

15:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Too early for vodka  :) you OK? — fortunavelut luna 09:41, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2017).

Administrator changes

Happyme22 • Dragons flight

Zad68

Guideline and policy news

• The RFC discussion regarding WP:OUTING and WMF essay about paid editing and outing (see more at the ArbCom noticeboard archives) is now archived. Milieus #3 and #4 received support; so did concrete proposal #1.

Technical news

• Fuzzy search will soon be added to Special:Undelete, allowing administrators to search for deleted page titles with results similar to the search query. You can test this by adding ?fuzzy=1 to the URL, as with Special:Undelete?fuzzy=1. Currently the search only finds pages that exactly match the search term.
• A new bot will automatically revision delete unused file versions from files in Category:Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old.

Miscellaneous

• A newly revamped database report can help identify users who may be eligible to be autopatrolled.
• A potentially compromised account from 2001–2002 attempted to request resysop. Please practice appropriate account security by using a unique password for Knowledge (XXG), and consider enabling two-factor authentication. Currently around 17% of admins have enabled 2FA, up from 16% in February 2017.
• Did you know: On 29 June 2017, there were 1,261 administrators on the English Knowledge (XXG) – the exact number of administrators as there were ten years ago on 29 June 2007. Since that time, the English Knowledge (XXG) has grown from 1.85 million articles to over 5.43 million.

---

15:07, 10 July 2017 (UTC)