1248:(Please use English: while you and I understand Dutch, other people may visit your talk page as well.) I don't think there is anything so bad that it really needs undoing (although I would understand it if people who have these pages watchlisted would partially or completely revert it) (and I have only checked your last seven edits or so): I just think that many of your changes are useless, and some are negative (not vandal-like, just that the end result is not as good as the previous state of the page). I don't mind small edits, there are many, many small things that
1548:, so I can surmise that you have never nominated or reviewed an article. I cannot track your page views, however, so I have no way of knowing if you have visited and read the nomination pages. I would tend to guess that you haven't, but who knows? Well, you, obviously. Your edits don't show any consideration for future reviews, so I think that you don't know much concerning reviews. Would you like to know anything about them? -
2316:
1199:, the order of things seemes well thought out, with e.g. in the section "Print" links to the term put before unlinked items and so on. Alphabetical order is not superior to other orders and conveys no meaning. You also added a second bluelink to the link about the song by Built to Spill, even though the disambig guideline says to only have one bluelink per entry. Similarly, on
1609:. Good Article and Featured Article status are both ranks of articles, saying how good they are, with Featured Articles being Knowledge (XXG)'s best work. The Peer Review is for any time in an article's development, and is used to suggest improvements. If you ever write an article, you want it to get to FA, but first it should reach GA. If you have time, why don't you try
1876:
597:
1329:
519:
1682:
1995:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are
2156:
You're right, putting * at the beginning of lists is no longer encouraged, although many people wouldn't realise it from looking at wikipedia. Lists are pretty common in the lower quality articles but are generally absent from Good and
Featured articles. There is a time and a place for lists, such as
2049:
As noted in that earlier comment above... I don't think I can agree with alphabetizing See alsos as a general rule for articles. Sure, it's fine if there truly is no sensible order and the links are just a pile of related articles. But many times, there is a method to the madness. In the See also
555:
You're marking all your changes as minor and not stating what changes you have made. This is not polite to other editors, as people watch the pages to make sure they don't get vandalised. Every time you make an edit without leaving a description of what you did, someone has to check, to see if it has
907:
Well, the 5th pillar itself says that there are no firm rules, so be bold in editing. The level of concensus does not change depending on whether the editors involved are all admins or wether they are all unregistered users with no contributions. If you see something you think could be changed, then
1288:
alphabetized, and that any other order is an error. Whenyou have a list of e.G. notable alumni which is completely alphabetized, but with two or three names taggedon at the end out of order, then the logical conclusion is that these should be alphabetized as well. When you have a list of "see also"
795:
Oh, and 3 things: The comment is signed, it just failed to link/colourise, and if the signature failed to parse completely, then SineBot would toddle along to do it; it is common practice to spread a discussion over two users talkpages, as it alerts the users to new comments clearly and easily; and
1252:
to be done, but it is not productive to blindly apply rules: in listsof people, it is often good to alphabetize them (but other orders, e.g. chronological, are equally valid and should not be undone): but in categories, external links, ... there may well be a reason why it is not alphabetized, and
2263:
thanks for your input. Basically it´s a good idea to start the article with an image of a
Frescography. I will look around if I find some. Since it seems now after your edit that the article starting with the image "the wild of the southern sea" (which is actually a wood block print) would be an
461:
Please don't routinely add whitespace to articles you touch in the manner of changing ==Heading== to == Heading ==. There's nothing in the manual of style recommending a change like that and it makes it harder to see what else you're changing. You also shouldn't add links to dates as a matter of
1093:
Daar lijk je wel op met je standaardwijzigingen. Nooit iets afwijkends, alleen maar botwijzigingen. Is hetgene waar wikipedia naar streeft niet wat interessanter? Namelijk zoveel mogelijk informatie beschikbaar stellen. Ik weet niet of het zoveel mensen boeit of dit wel of niet op alfabetische
1364:
I have removed the
European flag because it is not informative about Belgium. The map of Belgium as a part of the European Union informs the reader much better that Belgium is a EU member! I think a rule should be not more than one picture pro section but we can discuss about exceptions.
725:
Hello! I'm interested in adopting you. Now, I don't speak Dutch, so if you don't want me because of this, I don't mind. I am pretty comprehensive on most of
Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines, and am willing to teach yuo them if you want. If you want me to adopt you, leave a note on
1289:
or "external links", then it is often very logical that the official page(s) com first, and other resources afterwards, and this should not be changed to make it alphabetized. When it is not absolutely clear that your edits are an actual improvement, either donb't do them or discuss them.
2014:
1132:
Gelukkig nieuwjaar! I just popped by to check how you're getting on. I've been a bit hands-free, but you appear to be getting on fine. Now, bots are defined as "programs or scripts that make automated edits without the necessity of human decision-making" (from
1741:
nor can I ascertain that you followed the nomination guidelines that required you "Add {{subst:GAN|subtopic=name of the subsection on this page where the article is listed}} to the top of the nominated article's talk page." Have I missed something here?
1911:, and it draw my attention to how much of a mess the page has become. Thank you for drawing my attention to this fact, and i will now spend the next few days trying to clean it up. In the meantime, why don't you try warning 76.112.219.30 on their
2192:
Except it doesn't make better flow and style. Instead of an easy-to-scan list, there is just an unreadable morass of blue links. I'm not aware of any consensus or MOS guideline for the above. If this has changed recently, please point to it.
1439:
Thanks for your contributions to the article, but added links like gate, were not so important to the context of the article. Other added like
Pandharpur, Tamil Nadu, Buddha are given in the lead so are not repeated in the article. See
1213:
Such mechanical edits are rarely needed and often have unwanted results. Please stop or at least be a lot more careful before continuing. Only edit when you are really improving articles, not just for the sake of it.
2054:, for example, the Italian War of 1521-26 is far less important than the others, while the first articles listed in the See also are a direct spin-off of the article, then followed by some loosely connected wars.
2397:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
1346:
and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding
608:
for your edits. Thank you. It is considerate to those who are following the articles you edit, as well as to other editors who are trying to gain a sense of what you are doing with your (prolific) edits.
536:
and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding
690:(it's not a minor edit, and it's not proper format or order). Also note that you can set your account preferences to be automatically notified if you forget to provide an edit summary. Have fun editing.
2080:
in your
Preferences, and then to use the revert option while viewing the article history and having chosen the correct version to revert to. BTW, I've requested semi-protection for the article at
800:
encourages centralised discussion, but an adoption requires 2 people, and so anyone else following the discussion would expect to see comments on two corresponding pages. My offer still stands...
2330:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "
2218:
there is no need to remove a blank space under a heading. It is optional and makes no difference to the screen appearance. A space makes it easier to find the heading in the edit box. Also per
1480:, I was browsing thorugh the page history to find that you then made an edit. Always nice to see users I know, I thought. Then, lo and behold, I was just finishing the review process for
1484:
when I saw you had just made an edit there as well! Ooh, I'm easily amused. Anyway, this chance enpcunter brought a question: how much do you know about the review process in general? -
2337:
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to
1210:
Department", with a different and incorrect capitalization. Furthermore, in the external links, you cahnaged from a descending importance / closeness order to the alphabetical order.
480:
I'd like to second this sentiment -- my guess is that you're using some kind of tool to make changes, and it adjusts things automatically. Unfortunately, it made quite a mess of the
41:. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Knowledge (XXG). If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place
2338:
1923:. I suggest you use this one, but feel free to choose your own: {{subst:uw-delete1|PageName}} - ~~~~. If you don't want to, you don't have to, but warning the user may earn you
638:
Thanks. Just those simple sorts of things - "alpha and chron order" - mean people don't have to be figuring it out for themselves. Summaries are *very* helpful in that way!
1203:, you changed the order of the see also section to alphabetical, even though it was quite clear that the RS noticeboard was deliberately and logically put in first position.
165:
2028:
Thank you so much for your anti-vandalism efforts while poor Ælfheah of
Canterbury was on the main page! May an obscure little Anglo-Saxon bishop and saint bless you.
63:
or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving
Knowledge (XXG) you might want to consider being "
1761:. I should have made myself clearer. If you want to nominate an article, then yes, put the GAReview template up on the Talk Page, but also list the article at
746:
Wikiquette #3, (my personal one) do not hide any comments from other users, they might get confused and would not be able to follow the discussion anymore.
1698:
by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
209:
72:
1992:
1175:
Gelukkig
Nieuwjaar to you too. Glad you're still around. If I do something wrong, please do not hesitate to tell me. I would very much appreciate it!
2280:
488:) by moving images around without making appropriate adjustments to the surrounding text. A quick glance through your recent history also shows up a
1545:
941:
I was just gauging how much you knew of
Knowledge (XXG) already. Is there anything you don't have any experience in to do with Knowledge (XXG)? -
1757:
Ah... whoops. I go away for a week, and now look what happens. Sorry about not noticing this earlier, but there was no Internet connection in the
492:
of edits that include gratuitous whitespace changes, making it difficult to see what actually changed. Please fix your tool or stop using it. --
354:
2127:
article has been reverted. Knowledge (XXG) encourages lists in articles to be converted into prose for better flow and style. Happy editing,
1773:, and choosing an article from there. You then click on the "follow this link" on the GA review template at the top, and review from there.
1738:
1541:
438:
376:
2422:
2290:
you're supporting the proposal? As it is a request for comment, some clarification would be nice (even if the reason is obvious). Regards,
205:
1996:
1988:
1908:
1897:
363:
1138:
1109:
1095:
1065:
691:
652:
Thnks! I was just trying to a search for a correct way of phrasing it buy you gave me the answer in the meantime. From now on I'll add:
2305:
390:
183:
328:
260:
200:
60:
358:
310:
2418:
730:, or here. If you don't want me, just tell me, and I'll remove all traces of me on your user page. Hello again! - weebiloobil
314:
133:
1734:
38:
430:
297:
221:
2323:
1284:
Umm, common sense? When in doubt, the talk page of the article? What I mean is: there is no need to assume that anything
1200:
386:
288:
238:
234:
187:
137:
2142:
Thanks for letting me know, but do I get it right thinking the * at the beginning of the lists is no longer encouraged?
2409:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
256:
217:
2414:
2158:
412:
408:
243:
196:
1481:
336:
225:
192:
332:
323:
292:
127:
64:
34:
2089:
2003:
1537:
372:
367:
68:
1113:
1099:
1069:
695:
2051:
1912:
264:
230:
54:
2410:
2219:
1655:
421:
319:
305:
251:
160:
1949:
1854:
1799:
1635:
1570:
1506:
1418:
I stand corrected. You did not remove anything, you simply moved it down. Sorry for the accusations. -
1163:
1045:
1020:
999:
963:
930:
895:
855:
822:
784:
727:
2362:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --
1777:
explains how this is done. Sorry about this confusion, and feel free to ask me any further questions -
1695:
1691:
1441:
1343:
533:
301:
123:
2367:
1916:
1423:
1409:
1207:
462:
routine. Also, please don't take bullet points out of comments and add them to the article elsewhere.
2386:
2377:
382:
2269:
2085:
1743:
908:
change it! The worse that could happen is it be reverted. That was a very good answer, well done -
639:
610:
497:
2406:
2390:
679:
2327:
2309:
2295:
2059:
2033:
1747:
1671:
1016:
643:
614:
561:
470:
797:
683:
601:
434:
1268:... there may well be a reason why it is not alphabetized, and that reason should be respected?
2264:
article about that print method rather than the frescography I just undo your edit. Thanks --
1815:
1730:
605:
91:
78:
2402:
2394:
2081:
1924:
1920:
416:
247:
2348:
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the
2209:
1928:
1833:
1778:
1614:
1549:
1485:
1445:
1142:
1024:
978:
942:
909:
874:
834:
801:
763:
2405:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
2398:
2359:
2349:
2342:
2331:
2077:
1774:
1770:
1766:
1762:
1610:
1606:
1598:
1134:
155:
2363:
1419:
1405:
1352:
542:
1602:
2265:
2166:
2132:
2013:
1811:
1758:
1703:
1348:
1294:
1258:
1219:
538:
493:
425:
50:
2322:
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for
2076:, and in particular your edit summary. The simplest approach is probably to activate
71:
to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click
2352:
template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
2291:
2239:
2225:
2196:
2176:
2143:
2124:
2100:
2055:
2029:
1962:
1819:
1711:
1667:
1663:
1584:
1519:
1457:
1381:
1336:
1304:
1271:
1231:
1176:
1080:
749:
706:
657:
625:
576:
557:
526:
466:
686:(minor edits); some of your changes are not appropriate for the English WP, such as
2254:
1984:
1977:
1370:
1023:
a bit of a temper. Oh, and I won't be here tomorrow, so don't rush in :P. Thanks -
86:
873:
Just wondering, what's your understanding of the 5 pillars of Knowledge (XXG)? -
572:
2315:
624:
Thanks for reminding me. I tend to forget. I'll do my very very best, promise!
1961:
Made it (till now I mean...) Thanks for the easter eggs, really enjoyed them!
2222:
a left-aligned image should not appear under a level 3 === heading or lower.
2162:
2128:
1814:, I'll have a look at it in a minute. Also, I'll try to figure out how this
1290:
1254:
1215:
481:
1206:
In your last edit, you e.g. changed "Occupational Therapy Department" to "
1477:
75:
for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to
1875:
596:
2393:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
1659:
1433:
1366:
59:
2426:
2371:
2299:
2273:
2247:
2232:
2203:
2184:
2170:
2151:
2136:
2108:
2093:
2063:
2036:
1970:
1955:
1860:
1827:
1805:
1751:
1719:
1675:
1641:
1592:
1576:
1527:
1512:
1465:
1450:
1427:
1413:
1389:
1374:
1312:
1298:
1279:
1262:
1239:
1223:
1184:
1169:
1117:
1103:
1094:
volgorde is. Laat je los, voel je vrij en ga je gang. Ga schrijven! --
1088:
1073:
1051:
1005:
969:
936:
901:
861:
828:
790:
757:
731:
714:
699:
665:
647:
633:
618:
584:
565:
501:
474:
98:
2161:
which is dedicated to a list, but they're discouraged from articles.
1885:
1196:
2119:
Hi, I'm just letting you know that the edit where you converted the
1518:
Good question, what do I know about review process in your opinion?
1137:), and that doesn't appear to apply to you. My advice is to ignore
1681:
1328:
518:
1195:
Please don't alphabetize things just for the sake of it. E.g. on
977:
Random question - why are you alphabetising External Links? -
275:
110:
24:
2314:
1810:
Don't worry, no hard feelings. Hope you had a great time in
1694:
and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the
1680:
1327:
517:
1991:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets
465:
Also, please don't remove redlinks as a matter of course.
1011:
Oh dear - I have a bit of a request. Could you look over
2339:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Molecule Man (art)
1765:. Full instructions for nominating an article are found
2216:
2074:
1904:
1533:
1401:
1012:
687:
485:
463:
2175:
I take it alphabetizing is no longer encouraged then?
1903:
Hello! I was browsing your contributions, when I saw
678:
Hello, when you have some time please have a look at
2281:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Full-date unlinking bot#Support
1769:. You review a Good Article nomination by going to
571:
I did not meant to do anything wrong, just followed
1270:Where can I find information about these reasons ?
2385:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
740:Wikiquette #1, don't foget to sign your comments!
2099:Thnks and, good idea about the semi-protection!
1597:OK. Well, there are three main types of review:
1230:Welke bijdragen vind je moet ik ongedaan maken?
53:and ask your question there. Please remember to
1706:}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
1108:Met negeren lost men niets op, mijn vriend. --
1915:. A list of templates that I use for this is
1690:, Galoubet has smiled at you! Smiles promote
8:
1818:works out, I'll come back to you if need be!
67:" by a more experienced editor or joining a
762:Sounds like you barely need adoption :P -
2011:
1883:This user would like to wish you a happy
1613:? The best way to learn is to practise -
743:Wikiquette #2, keep discussions together!
1739:Knowledge (XXG):Good_article_nominations
1355:}} to their talk pages. Happy editing!
545:}} to their talk pages. Happy editing!
2358:This is an automatic notification by a
1909:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Tutorial (Editing)
1898:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Tutorial (Editing)
556:been vandalised. It's a waste of time.
161:Where to ask questions or make comments
737:Maybe I should consider adopting you?
7:
1737:but I cannot find the discussion at
604:. Please don't forget to provide an
600:Thank you for your contributions to
1611:reviewing a Good Article nomination
128:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
2286:Hi, could you give a reason as to
1456:Thanks! Appreciate your comments.
1342:has smiled at you! Smiles promote
532:has smiled at you! Smiles promote
37:to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for
14:
2411:review the candidates' statements
2045:Alphabetizing See alsos, part II.
2022:The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
1771:the Good Article nominations page
1253:that reason should be respected.
2012:
1874:
1869:
1201:Knowledge (XXG):Reliable sources
595:
58:
20:
1775:WP:GAN#How to review an article
166:Request administrator attention
2417:. For the Election committee,
2387:Arbitration Committee election
2378:ArbCom elections are now open!
1735:Boston College (United States)
1546:WP:Featured article candidates
1:
2427:13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
1118:16:11, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
1104:14:24, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
1089:12:12, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
1074:11:47, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
1052:08:27, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
1015:, to see what I did to annoy
1006:18:29, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
970:15:31, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
937:08:07, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
902:17:44, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
862:07:54, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
829:20:16, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
791:19:47, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
758:17:42, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
732:17:32, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
715:10:43, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
700:20:30, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
666:12:17, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
648:12:13, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
634:11:32, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
619:11:29, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
475:10:05, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
210:Biographies of living persons
106:
1989:featured article review here
1702:Smile at others by adding {{
1402:removed all this information
1390:09:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
1375:09:29, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
1313:11:46, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
1299:11:19, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
1280:11:05, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
1263:11:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
1240:10:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
1224:10:20, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
585:12:37, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
566:12:33, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
502:19:34, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
2413:and submit your choices on
2332:What Knowledge (XXG) is not
2326:. The nominated article is
2159:list of castles in Cheshire
1542:WP:Good article nominations
1404:without an explanation? -
1185:12:45, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
1170:12:41, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
682:(disambiguation pages) and
235:Policy for non-free content
206:What Knowledge (XXG) is not
99:16:51, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
2442:
2419:MediaWiki message delivery
1971:06:45, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
1956:18:01, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
1861:09:09, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
1828:10:55, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
1806:10:49, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
1720:09:14, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
1676:18:15, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
1666:. I really appreciate it!
1642:22:09, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
1593:05:36, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
1577:12:21, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
1528:06:34, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
1513:21:25, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
1482:Survivors (2008 TV series)
1476:Hello! Having GA-reviewed
156:Frequently Asked Questions
57:on talk pages by clicking
2372:01:46, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
2345:with four tildes (~~~~).
2300:23:11, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
2274:17:18, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
2248:13:39, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
2233:12:58, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
2204:12:55, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
2185:13:39, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
2171:13:34, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
2152:13:27, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
2137:13:23, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
2018:
1993:featured article criteria
1752:14:10, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
1466:14:43, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
1451:13:02, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
1428:16:54, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
1414:12:17, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
1400:Was there any reason you
2243:
2180:
2147:
2109:13:04, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
2104:
2094:11:21, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
1966:
1823:
1715:
1588:
1523:
1461:
1385:
1308:
1275:
1235:
1180:
1084:
753:
710:
661:
629:
580:
124:Knowledge (XXG) Tutorial
2064:22:24, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
2052:Revolt of the Comuneros
2037:14:29, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
1380:OK, that's fine to me!
364:Pages needing attention
359:Help develop an article
175:Policies and Guidelines
2319:
1685:
1332:
522:
2391:Arbitration Committee
2350:articles for deletion
2318:
2004:Ælfheah of Canterbury
1684:
1331:
654:alpha and chron order
521:
184:Neutral point of view
2341:. Please be sure to
1905:your courageous edit
1208:Occupational therapy
1079:No, I am not a BOT!
1064:Ben jij een bot ? --
377:Translating articles
293:Adopt-a-user program
261:Conflict of interest
201:No original research
2395:arbitration process
1729:Hello! You added a
1654:Thanks for being a
311:No personal attacks
77:always fill in the
2407:arbitration policy
2343:sign your comments
2328:Molecule Man (art)
2320:
2310:Molecule Man (art)
2073:Hi! Re: this edit
1890:
1686:
1534:your contributions
1333:
1017:User talk:Lycurgus
523:
373:Join a WikiProject
355:Be bold in editing
315:Resolving disputes
39:your contributions
2084:. Best wishes.
2069:Undoing vandalism
2042:
2041:
1983:I have nominated
1894:
1893:
1882:
1816:Template:GAReview
1731:Template:GAReview
1708:
1536:show no edits of
454:
453:
450:
449:
446:
445:
298:Assume good faith
272:
271:
222:Three-revert rule
105:
104:
83:. Happy editing!
2433:
2228:
2210:Vincent van Gogh
2199:
2016:
2009:
2008:
1952:
1946:
1943:
1940:
1937:
1934:
1931:
1878:
1870:
1857:
1851:
1848:
1845:
1842:
1839:
1836:
1832:Happy Easter! -
1802:
1796:
1793:
1790:
1787:
1784:
1781:
1700:
1638:
1632:
1629:
1626:
1623:
1620:
1617:
1607:Featured Article
1573:
1567:
1564:
1561:
1558:
1555:
1552:
1509:
1503:
1500:
1497:
1494:
1491:
1488:
1448:
1341:
1166:
1160:
1157:
1154:
1151:
1148:
1145:
1048:
1042:
1039:
1036:
1033:
1030:
1027:
1002:
996:
993:
990:
987:
984:
981:
966:
960:
957:
954:
951:
948:
945:
933:
927:
924:
921:
918:
915:
912:
898:
892:
889:
886:
883:
880:
877:
858:
852:
849:
846:
843:
840:
837:
825:
819:
816:
813:
810:
807:
804:
787:
781:
778:
775:
772:
769:
766:
599:
531:
510:
431:Useful templates
289:Community Portal
276:
239:Image use policy
188:Reliable sources
111:
107:
96:
94:
89:
62:
47:
46:
25:
21:
2441:
2440:
2436:
2435:
2434:
2432:
2431:
2430:
2415:the voting page
2381:
2313:
2284:
2258:
2226:
2213:
2197:
2123:section of the
2117:
2071:
2047:
2007:
1981:
1950:
1944:
1941:
1938:
1935:
1932:
1929:
1927:. Good luck! -
1901:
1855:
1849:
1846:
1843:
1840:
1837:
1834:
1800:
1794:
1791:
1788:
1785:
1782:
1779:
1727:
1709:
1652:
1636:
1630:
1627:
1624:
1621:
1618:
1615:
1583:I'm all yours!
1571:
1565:
1562:
1559:
1556:
1553:
1550:
1507:
1501:
1498:
1495:
1492:
1489:
1486:
1474:
1446:
1437:
1398:
1362:
1357:
1335:
1193:
1164:
1158:
1155:
1152:
1149:
1146:
1143:
1130:
1062:
1046:
1040:
1037:
1034:
1031:
1028:
1025:
1000:
994:
991:
988:
985:
982:
979:
964:
958:
955:
952:
949:
946:
943:
931:
925:
922:
919:
916:
913:
910:
896:
890:
887:
884:
881:
878:
875:
856:
850:
847:
844:
841:
838:
835:
823:
817:
814:
811:
808:
805:
802:
785:
779:
776:
773:
770:
767:
764:
723:
676:
602:Knowledge (XXG)
593:
547:
525:
509:{{subst:smile}}
508:
459:
401:
347:
320:Build consensus
281:
257:Deletion policy
218:Manual of Style
176:
148:
138:upload an image
116:
115:Getting Started
101:
92:
87:
85:
44:
43:
19:
12:
11:
5:
2439:
2437:
2384:
2380:
2375:
2312:
2308:nomination of
2303:
2283:
2279:Your !vote at
2277:
2257:
2252:
2251:
2250:
2215:Per this edit,
2212:
2207:
2190:
2189:
2188:
2187:
2173:
2121:notable people
2116:
2113:
2112:
2111:
2086:Philip Trueman
2070:
2067:
2046:
2043:
2040:
2039:
2025:
2024:
2019:
2017:
2006:
2001:
1980:
1975:
1974:
1973:
1900:
1895:
1892:
1891:
1880:
1868:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1864:
1863:
1812:Brecon Beacons
1759:Brecon Beacons
1726:
1723:
1699:
1688:Hello Galoubet
1679:
1651:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1538:WP:Peer review
1473:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1436:
1431:
1397:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1361:
1358:
1326:
1324:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1265:
1243:
1242:
1192:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1129:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1061:
1058:
1056:
1008:
975:
974:
973:
972:
871:
870:
869:
868:
867:
866:
865:
864:
793:
747:
744:
741:
722:
719:
718:
717:
675:
672:
671:
670:
669:
668:
650:
592:
589:
588:
587:
549:
516:
514:
512:
511:
505:
504:
458:
455:
452:
451:
448:
447:
444:
443:
442:
441:
428:
419:
403:
402:
399:
396:
395:
394:
393:
379:
370:
361:
349:
348:
345:
342:
341:
340:
339:
326:
317:
308:
295:
283:
282:
279:
273:
270:
269:
268:
267:
254:
244:External links
241:
228:
214:
213:
212:
203:
197:Citing sources
190:
178:
177:
174:
171:
170:
169:
168:
163:
158:
150:
149:
146:
143:
142:
141:
140:
130:
118:
117:
114:
103:
102:
55:sign your name
28:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2438:
2429:
2428:
2424:
2420:
2416:
2412:
2408:
2404:
2400:
2396:
2392:
2388:
2379:
2376:
2374:
2373:
2369:
2365:
2361:
2357:
2353:
2351:
2346:
2344:
2340:
2335:
2333:
2329:
2325:
2317:
2311:
2307:
2304:
2302:
2301:
2297:
2293:
2289:
2282:
2278:
2276:
2275:
2271:
2267:
2261:
2260:Hi Galoubet,
2256:
2253:
2249:
2245:
2241:
2237:
2236:
2235:
2234:
2231:
2230:
2229:
2221:
2217:
2211:
2208:
2206:
2205:
2202:
2201:
2200:
2186:
2182:
2178:
2174:
2172:
2168:
2164:
2160:
2155:
2154:
2153:
2149:
2145:
2141:
2140:
2139:
2138:
2134:
2130:
2126:
2125:Cheadle Hulme
2122:
2114:
2110:
2106:
2102:
2098:
2097:
2096:
2095:
2091:
2087:
2083:
2079:
2075:
2068:
2066:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2053:
2044:
2038:
2035:
2031:
2027:
2026:
2023:
2020:
2015:
2010:
2005:
2002:
2000:
1998:
1994:
1990:
1986:
1979:
1976:
1972:
1968:
1964:
1960:
1959:
1958:
1957:
1953:
1947:
1926:
1922:
1918:
1914:
1910:
1906:
1899:
1896:
1888:
1887:
1881:
1879:
1877:
1872:
1871:
1862:
1858:
1852:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1825:
1821:
1817:
1813:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1803:
1797:
1776:
1772:
1768:
1764:
1760:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1749:
1745:
1740:
1736:
1732:
1724:
1722:
1721:
1717:
1713:
1707:
1705:
1697:
1693:
1689:
1683:
1678:
1677:
1673:
1669:
1665:
1664:Oceanic Crust
1661:
1657:
1649:
1643:
1639:
1633:
1612:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1582:
1578:
1574:
1568:
1547:
1543:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1510:
1504:
1483:
1479:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1449:
1443:
1435:
1432:
1430:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1416:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1403:
1395:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1372:
1368:
1359:
1356:
1354:
1350:
1345:
1340:
1339:
1330:
1325:
1314:
1310:
1306:
1303:OK, thanks !
1302:
1301:
1300:
1296:
1292:
1287:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1266:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1251:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1211:
1209:
1204:
1202:
1198:
1191:Alphabetizing
1190:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1167:
1161:
1140:
1139:82.171.95.220
1136:
1128:Status Update
1127:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1110:82.171.95.220
1107:
1106:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1096:82.171.95.220
1092:
1091:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1066:82.171.95.220
1059:
1057:
1054:
1053:
1049:
1043:
1022:
1021:seems to have
1018:
1014:
1009:
1007:
1003:
997:
971:
967:
961:
940:
939:
938:
934:
928:
906:
905:
904:
903:
899:
893:
863:
859:
853:
832:
831:
830:
826:
820:
799:
794:
792:
788:
782:
761:
760:
759:
755:
751:
748:
745:
742:
739:
738:
736:
735:
734:
733:
729:
720:
716:
712:
708:
704:
703:
702:
701:
697:
693:
692:62.147.36.230
689:
685:
681:
673:
667:
663:
659:
655:
651:
649:
645:
641:
637:
636:
635:
631:
627:
623:
622:
621:
620:
616:
612:
607:
603:
598:
591:Another issue
590:
586:
582:
578:
574:
570:
569:
568:
567:
563:
559:
554:
553:another issue
550:
546:
544:
540:
535:
530:
529:
520:
515:
507:
506:
503:
499:
495:
491:
487:
484:article (see
483:
479:
478:
477:
476:
472:
468:
464:
456:
440:
436:
432:
429:
427:
423:
420:
418:
414:
410:
407:
406:
405:
404:
400:Miscellaneous
398:
397:
392:
388:
384:
381:Cleaning up:
380:
378:
374:
371:
369:
365:
362:
360:
356:
353:
352:
351:
350:
344:
343:
338:
337:Mailing lists
334:
330:
327:
325:
321:
318:
316:
312:
309:
307:
303:
299:
296:
294:
290:
287:
286:
285:
284:
280:The Community
278:
277:
274:
266:
262:
258:
255:
253:
249:
245:
242:
240:
236:
232:
229:
227:
226:Sock puppetry
223:
219:
216:
215:
211:
207:
204:
202:
198:
194:
193:Verifiability
191:
189:
185:
182:
181:
180:
179:
173:
172:
167:
164:
162:
159:
157:
154:
153:
152:
151:
145:
144:
139:
135:
131:
129:
125:
122:
121:
120:
119:
113:
112:
109:
108:
100:
97:
95:
90:
82:
80:
74:
70:
66:
61:
56:
52:
48:
40:
36:
32:
27:
26:
23:
22:
16:
2382:
2356:Please note:
2355:
2354:
2347:
2336:
2321:
2287:
2285:
2262:
2259:
2255:Frescography
2224:
2223:
2220:WP:MOSIMAGES
2214:
2195:
2194:
2191:
2120:
2118:
2072:
2048:
2021:
1985:Solar System
1982:
1978:Solar System
1919:, with more
1902:
1884:
1873:
1728:
1710:
1701:
1687:
1653:
1599:Good Article
1475:
1444:for more. --
1438:
1417:
1399:
1363:
1353:subst:smile2
1337:
1334:
1323:
1285:
1267:
1249:
1212:
1205:
1194:
1131:
1063:
1055:
1010:
976:
872:
728:my talk page
724:
677:
653:
606:edit summary
594:
575:guidelines.
552:
551:
548:
543:subst:smile2
527:
524:
513:
489:
460:
439:User scripts
413:Disambiguity
346:Things to do
333:IRC channels
324:Village pump
147:Getting Help
84:
79:edit summary
76:
42:
30:
1704:subst:Smile
1603:Peer Review
1472:Conicidence
1447:Redtigerxyz
1442:WP:OVERLINK
1349:subst:smile
573:Minor edits
539:subst:smile
457:Some issues
368:Peer review
134:edit a page
69:WikiProject
2403:topic bans
2364:Erwin85Bot
1420:Rockyobody
1406:Rockyobody
1396:Mtt Romney
426:Talk pages
422:User pages
409:Categories
265:Notability
231:Copyrights
45:{{helpme}}
2399:site bans
2266:Misterneu
1913:talk page
1656:WikiGnome
1650:Thank you
1286:should be
1013:this edit
833:Wahey! -
680:WP:MOSDAB
674:Dab pages
494:AdamRoach
486:this edit
482:Stenotype
391:Vandalism
306:Etiquette
252:Vandalism
51:talk page
2324:deletion
2292:Dabomb87
2240:Galoubet
2238:Thanks!
2177:Galoubet
2144:Galoubet
2101:Galoubet
2056:SnowFire
2030:Ealdgyth
1963:Galoubet
1925:a reward
1820:Galoubet
1744:Aepoutre
1725:GAReview
1712:Galoubet
1696:WikiLove
1692:WikiLove
1668:Awickert
1585:Galoubet
1520:Galoubet
1478:Play-Doh
1458:Galoubet
1382:Galoubet
1351:}} or {{
1344:WikiLove
1338:Galoubet
1305:Galoubet
1272:Galoubet
1232:Galoubet
1177:Galoubet
1081:Galoubet
798:WP:MULTI
750:Galoubet
721:Adoption
707:Galoubet
705:thanks!
688:this one
684:WP:MINOR
658:Galoubet
640:JohnInDC
626:Galoubet
611:JohnInDC
577:Galoubet
558:Amandajm
541:}} or {{
534:WikiLove
528:Galoubet
329:Signpost
302:Civility
132:How to:
49:on your
31:Galoubet
1733:tag to
1660:Geology
1434:Vithoba
1360:Belgium
1060:Aesopos
383:General
88:Marlith
65:adopted
35:Welcome
29:Hello,
17:Welcome
2389:. The
2078:popups
1987:for a
1886:Easter
1763:WP:GAN
1605:, and
1532:Well,
1197:Source
1135:WP:BOT
467:Haukur
93:(Talk)
2115:Lists
1019:? He
796:yes,
435:Tools
417:Stubs
81:field
2423:talk
2368:talk
2334:").
2296:talk
2270:talk
2244:talk
2181:talk
2167:talk
2163:Nev1
2148:talk
2133:talk
2129:Nev1
2105:talk
2090:talk
2082:RFPP
2060:talk
2050:for
2034:Talk
1997:here
1967:talk
1951:talk
1921:here
1917:here
1856:talk
1824:talk
1801:talk
1767:here
1748:talk
1716:talk
1672:talk
1662:and
1637:talk
1589:talk
1572:talk
1524:talk
1508:talk
1462:talk
1424:talk
1410:talk
1386:talk
1371:talk
1309:talk
1295:talk
1291:Fram
1276:talk
1259:talk
1255:Fram
1250:need
1236:talk
1220:talk
1216:Fram
1181:talk
1165:talk
1114:talk
1100:talk
1085:talk
1070:talk
1047:talk
1001:talk
965:talk
932:talk
897:talk
857:talk
824:talk
786:talk
754:talk
711:talk
696:talk
662:talk
644:talk
630:talk
615:talk
581:talk
562:talk
498:talk
471:talk
387:Spam
248:Spam
73:here
2383:Hi,
2360:bot
2306:AfD
2288:why
1907:to
1658:on
1544:or
490:ton
2425:)
2401:,
2370:)
2298:)
2272:)
2246:)
2227:Ty
2198:Ty
2183:)
2169:)
2150:)
2135:)
2107:)
2092:)
2062:)
2032:-
1999:.
1969:)
1954:)
1942:bi
1939:oo
1936:il
1933:eb
1930:we
1859:)
1847:bi
1844:oo
1841:il
1838:eb
1835:we
1826:)
1804:)
1792:bi
1789:oo
1786:il
1783:eb
1780:we
1750:)
1742:--
1718:)
1674:)
1640:)
1628:bi
1625:oo
1622:il
1619:eb
1616:we
1601:,
1591:)
1575:)
1563:bi
1560:oo
1557:il
1554:eb
1551:we
1540:,
1526:)
1511:)
1499:bi
1496:oo
1493:il
1490:eb
1487:we
1464:)
1426:)
1412:)
1388:)
1373:)
1367:Vb
1347:{{
1311:)
1297:)
1278:)
1261:)
1238:)
1226:.
1222:)
1183:)
1168:)
1156:bi
1153:oo
1150:il
1147:eb
1144:we
1141:-
1116:)
1102:)
1087:)
1072:)
1050:)
1038:bi
1035:oo
1032:il
1029:eb
1026:we
1004:)
992:bi
989:oo
986:il
983:eb
980:we
968:)
956:bi
953:oo
950:il
947:eb
944:we
935:)
923:bi
920:oo
917:il
914:eb
911:we
900:)
888:bi
885:oo
882:il
879:eb
876:we
860:)
848:bi
845:oo
842:il
839:eb
836:we
827:)
815:bi
812:oo
809:il
806:eb
803:we
789:)
777:bi
774:oo
771:il
768:eb
765:we
756:)
713:)
698:)
664:)
656:.
646:)
632:)
617:)
583:)
564:)
537:{{
500:)
473:)
437:•
433:•
424:•
415:•
411:•
389:•
385:•
375:•
366:•
357:•
335:•
331:•
322:•
313:•
304:•
300:•
291:•
263:•
259:•
250:•
246:•
237:•
233:•
224:•
220:•
208:•
199:•
195:•
186:•
136:•
126:•
33:!
2421:(
2366:(
2294:(
2268:(
2242:(
2179:(
2165:(
2146:(
2131:(
2103:(
2088:(
2058:(
1965:(
1948:(
1945:l
1889:.
1853:(
1850:l
1822:(
1798:(
1795:l
1746:(
1714:(
1670:(
1634:(
1631:l
1587:(
1569:(
1566:l
1522:(
1505:(
1502:l
1460:(
1422:(
1408:(
1384:(
1369:(
1307:(
1293:(
1274:(
1257:(
1234:(
1218:(
1179:(
1162:(
1159:l
1112:(
1098:(
1083:(
1068:(
1044:(
1041:l
998:(
995:l
962:(
959:l
929:(
926:l
894:(
891:l
854:(
851:l
821:(
818:l
783:(
780:l
752:(
709:(
694:(
660:(
642:(
628:(
613:(
579:(
560:(
496:(
469:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
