622:
policies and guidelines. You may be 74, and you may be a former skating coach and you may have seen
Khrystenn work unappreciated miracles on ice. (We don't have any way to verify those claims.) But any 19-year-old, even one who is utterly ignorant of skating, who shows good command of Knowledge (XXG) policies automatically outranks you on Knowledge (XXG), whether it's in editing Khrystenn's bio or any other article. It's just like in skating, actually: if you want respect, you have to show respect for others, and you have to earn their respect. The more disrespect you show, and the more ignorance you display (especially if you
743:-something youre already quite familiar with, I see) 5. All I am doing here is trying to figure this out and make this work! I have asked questions and been contructive in my edits. So, if you cannot see that in all of the last comments I have made, that is your problem. 6. Lastly, I am done dealing with you. ----Perhaps you may find something more useful to do with your time rather than attacking myself and others. My suggestion: update your resume. -Jed
688:
expressed even though they were about the course of action, not anybody in particular, and that same somebody voted twice against those opinions he didn't like, and without mentioning the suppression of opinion to anybody involved. I asked her if her patients would take exception to such behavior if they'd been subject to it themselves. "Of course they'd find a problem with it," she said, "they have your basic natural sense of human fairness."
547:
472:
509:
679:) be considered an unsourced negative comment on Khrystenn herself, just about her notability vis-a-vis Knowledge (XXG) standards. And the removal of either should have been remarked upon, with the reason for removal, in the discussion itself. You didn't even bother noting the reason for removal in your edit summary.
733:
YAKUSHIMA: 1. For the last time on the deletion subject, I did not know I was supposed to mention the delete. 2. Additionally, I apparently voted twice since I attempted to further my previous comments and thought I had to place the "Keep" there again. This was prior to anyone else's "Comments" so I
659:
editor you claim to be, you have not helped to answer any of my questions, have made no suggestions, etc. on the article (not that you are required to respond to), but you seem to have no problem responding through continuous run arounds and trying to pin anything weakness as a newcomer to this that
649:
intentions of trying to tamper the system, I would have just swiped em all. Initially, I did not even know you had to say something about it? Where does it mention this? At 74, I clearly understand rules and policies, and apologized for my previous error upon immediate realization. I am not sure why
766:
attack, in case you've forgotten, is one based on the person, rather than the argument made by the person. I pointed out that we had no way to verify what you said about yourself as a person -- that you were a 74-year-old retired skating coach with no vested interest in the subject. So we had to
687:
Why should policy need to? By some coincidence, I was recently on the phone with a friend of mine who works with Down
Syndrome patients. I put a roughly analogous situation to her -- i.e., where opinions about a course of action are being canvassed, and somebody suppressed some of the opinions
621:
saying anything about that move was simply a case of trying to game the system. And you also say that if you had really wanted to be "severe", you would have deleted all the comments. On what authority? Some rule you just made up on the spot for your own convenience? Knowledge (XXG) runs on
644:
As previously mentioned, I was NOT trying to tamper with the rules. When I came across the page and made an honest attempt to educate myself on the policy, I thought the two votes went against policy, and It said on the page that any user may remove them. What I in fact meant was that if I
767:
evaluate your Keep arguments on their merits. Your arguments, it turns out, had no merits: you simply repeated your claims, and never turned up any evidence for them. Get some distance from the subject. Edit something else, if you want to edit
Knowledge (XXG) skater bios. Start
654:
for you, when I have made several attempts and asked several questions about getting it right. The only thing you did was blast me on all my efforts. Moreover, I made one last attempt in my last messages to see what needs to be done, and once again, even as the more
530:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.
696:
On the contrary. I have pointed to relevant policy over and over. I have asked you to substantiate what you say. Your "efforts" seem to be limited largely to making statements and edits that can't be substantiated, or that are shown to be
613:: maybe you could get banned for tampering with an AfD discussion. You suppressed votes you didn't like, by deleting the votes and -- what's much worse -- leaving no notice anywhere that you had deleted them. If you'd
475:
Welcome to
Knowledge (XXG). Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at
484:, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the
738:
blasted myself and Ms. Asariah's credibility with your rants and specifics and by delegitimizing my personal age/career/editing abilities as outranked by any less competent Wiki editor. (Personal attack
717:
to have had your account for years, but your first edit on record, dates from
November of last year, when you added Khrystenn to the bio of a coach, as if she'd been one of his more important students.
579:
40:. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Knowledge (XXG). If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place
477:
62:
or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about
Knowledge (XXG), you might want to consider being "
713:
to be more senior, in that discussion. But it's objectively verifiable, from my thousands of edits, that I am. Hit the contribs link for me. You, on the other hand,
168:
762:
competent editor, even one who was 19 years old and knew nothing about skating. As you would be -- Knowledge (XXG) is substantially meritocratic. And an
212:
71:
153:
563:
190:
447:
208:
59:
526:
58:
399:
186:
331:
37:
571:
481:
263:
203:
527:
363:
313:
376:
317:
126:
120:
439:
300:
395:
291:
241:
237:
130:
259:
220:
567:
421:
417:
246:
199:
559:
339:
228:
195:
326:
295:
224:
112:
63:
31:
385:
381:
372:
368:
67:
517:
430:
267:
233:
53:
513:
322:
308:
254:
159:
434:
49:
598:
551:
304:
163:
116:
744:
665:"I thought the two votes went against policy, and It said on the page that any user may remove them."
668:
575:
485:
391:
358:
780:
768:
723:
635:
443:
685:"Initially, I did not even know you had to say something about it? Where does it mention this?"
536:
75:
425:
250:
74:
for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the
676:
672:
627:
335:
148:
758:"as outranked by any less competent Wiki editor." No, I said you'd be outranked by any
734:
did not know the format. So lay off this minor issue already. 3. And you are wrong, you
776:
719:
631:
587:
555:
493:
83:
626:
display it), the harder it will become for other editors (clenching their teeth under
566:, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please
70:
to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click
671:. The other one expressed good wishes for Khrystenn's eventual notability -- under
582:
if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you.
532:
771:, a far more notable skater than Khrystenn ever was. Shouldn't we be filling the
524:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
775:
gaps first, if we want
Knowledge (XXG) to be a credible source on the subject?
763:
583:
489:
79:
784:
752:
727:
639:
591:
540:
497:
87:
667:
One of the comments you removed was a simple statement of fact, based on
660:
you can find, all under an increasingly negative umbrella. Thanks a lot.
617:
something about it, you might have gotten some slack as a newbie.
675:, you're supposed to take that at face value. Neither can (under
521:
488:
to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
516:
and
Knowledge (XXG) pages that have open discussion, you should
630:) to veil their contempt. It's only human nature, after all.
278:
99:
24:
570:
or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's
578:
for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the
558:
or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be
554:
appears to have added incorrect information and has been
694:"The only thing you did was blast me on all my efforts."
512:
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
478:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Khrystenn
Asariah
78:field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!
52:and ask your question there. Please remember to
8:
66:" by a more experienced editor or joining a
7:
609:anything. Rather, I said something
113:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
14:
545:
525:
507:
470:
57:
20:
169:Request administrator attention
568:cite the references or sources
1:
550:Your recent edit to the page
213:Biographies of living persons
95:
785:04:18, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
753:17:24, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
728:16:48, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
640:04:28, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
592:16:26, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
541:17:39, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
498:11:36, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
88:11:34, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
707:editor you claim to be ..."
238:Policy for non-free content
209:What Knowledge (XXG) is not
154:New contributors' help page
801:
149:Frequently Asked Questions
56:on talk pages by clicking
748:
364:Help develop an article
178:Policies and Guidelines
601:and its Afd discussion
187:Neutral point of view
386:Translating articles
296:Adopt-a-user program
264:Conflict of interest
204:No original research
29:Hello, JPelligrino!
314:No personal attacks
34:to Knowledge (XXG)!
605:I did not mean to
382:Join a WikiProject
377:Requested articles
359:Be bold in editing
318:Resolving disputes
121:Your first article
38:your contributions
709:I never directly
703:"... as the more
599:Khrystenn Asariah
574:. Please use the
552:Khrystenn Asariah
503:Your recent edits
463:
462:
459:
458:
455:
454:
301:Assume good faith
275:
274:
225:Three-revert rule
94:
93:
792:
549:
548:
529:
511:
510:
480:, is considered
474:
473:
440:Useful templates
292:Community Portal
279:
242:Image use policy
191:Reliable sources
100:
96:
61:
46:
45:
25:
21:
800:
799:
795:
794:
793:
791:
790:
789:
603:
546:
520:by typing four
518:sign your posts
508:
505:
471:
468:
410:
350:
323:Build consensus
284:
260:Deletion policy
221:Manual of Style
179:
141:
131:upload an image
105:
104:Getting Started
90:
43:
42:
19:
12:
11:
5:
798:
796:
788:
787:
731:
730:
699:
698:
690:
689:
681:
680:
602:
597:Your edits to
595:
504:
501:
467:
464:
461:
460:
457:
456:
453:
452:
451:
450:
437:
428:
412:
411:
408:
405:
404:
403:
402:
388:
379:
366:
352:
351:
348:
345:
344:
343:
342:
329:
320:
311:
298:
286:
285:
282:
276:
273:
272:
271:
270:
257:
247:External links
244:
231:
217:
216:
215:
206:
200:Citing sources
193:
181:
180:
177:
174:
173:
172:
171:
166:
156:
151:
143:
142:
139:
136:
135:
134:
133:
123:
107:
106:
103:
92:
91:
54:sign your name
36:Thank you for
28:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
797:
786:
782:
778:
774:
770:
769:Richard Dwyer
765:
761:
757:
756:
755:
754:
750:
746:
742:
737:
729:
725:
721:
716:
712:
708:
704:
701:
700:
695:
692:
691:
686:
683:
682:
678:
674:
670:
666:
663:
662:
661:
658:
653:
648:
642:
641:
637:
633:
629:
625:
620:
616:
612:
608:
600:
596:
594:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
561:
557:
553:
543:
542:
538:
534:
528:
523:
519:
515:
502:
500:
499:
495:
491:
487:
483:
479:
465:
449:
445:
441:
438:
436:
432:
429:
427:
423:
419:
416:
415:
414:
413:
409:Miscellaneous
407:
406:
401:
397:
393:
390:Cleaning up:
389:
387:
383:
380:
378:
374:
370:
367:
365:
361:
360:
356:
355:
354:
353:
347:
346:
341:
340:Mailing lists
337:
333:
330:
328:
324:
321:
319:
315:
312:
310:
306:
302:
299:
297:
293:
290:
289:
288:
287:
283:The Community
281:
280:
277:
269:
265:
261:
258:
256:
252:
248:
245:
243:
239:
235:
232:
230:
229:Sock puppetry
226:
222:
219:
218:
214:
210:
207:
205:
201:
197:
196:Verifiability
194:
192:
188:
185:
184:
183:
182:
176:
175:
170:
167:
165:
164:make requests
161:
160:ask questions
157:
155:
152:
150:
147:
146:
145:
144:
138:
137:
132:
128:
124:
122:
118:
114:
111:
110:
109:
108:
102:
101:
98:
97:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
65:
60:
55:
51:
47:
39:
35:
33:
27:
26:
23:
22:
16:
772:
759:
740:
735:
732:
714:
710:
706:
702:
693:
684:
664:
656:
651:
646:
643:
624:persistently
623:
618:
614:
610:
606:
604:
580:welcome page
544:
506:
486:welcome page
482:bad practice
469:
466:January 2011
448:User scripts
422:Disambiguity
357:
349:Things to do
336:IRC channels
327:Village pump
140:Getting Help
76:edit summary
41:
30:
745:JPelligrino
373:Peer review
369:Maintenance
127:edit a page
68:WikiProject
764:ad hominem
741:ad hominem
669:WP:ATHLETE
650:it became
611:explicitly
560:verifiable
514:talk pages
435:Talk pages
431:User pages
418:Categories
268:Notability
234:Copyrights
158:Where to:
44:{{helpme}}
777:Yakushima
720:Yakushima
632:Yakushima
572:talk page
400:Vandalism
309:Etiquette
255:Vandalism
50:talk page
564:reliable
556:reverted
332:Signpost
305:Civility
125:How to:
117:Tutorial
48:on your
711:claimed
576:sandbox
533:SineBot
392:General
64:adopted
32:Welcome
17:Welcome
705:senior
697:wrong.
677:WP:AGF
673:WP:AGF
657:senior
652:harder
628:WP:AGF
522:tildes
715:claim
607:imply
562:in a
444:Tools
426:Stubs
781:talk
760:more
749:talk
736:have
724:talk
636:talk
615:said
588:talk
584:Whpq
537:talk
494:talk
490:Whpq
396:Spam
251:Spam
84:talk
80:Whpq
72:here
773:big
647:had
619:Not
783:)
751:)
726:)
638:)
590:)
539:)
531:--
496:)
446:•
442:•
433:•
424:•
420:•
398:•
394:•
384:•
375:•
371:•
362:•
338:•
334:•
325:•
316:•
307:•
303:•
294:•
266:•
262:•
253:•
249:•
240:•
236:•
227:•
223:•
211:•
202:•
198:•
189:•
162:•
129:•
119:•
115:•
86:)
779:(
747:(
722:(
634:(
586:(
535:(
492:(
82:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
