534:"I feel your anger" - like star wars Imperator said. If St Isidore made books with contents from other Authors, but yet he signed them with his own Name. You playing with words or you have problem with semantic side. If I use form "my thesis" that only mean that it is base which I defend, and not that these are Mine in full. So please: could You be more ethical, instead use with "arguments" from overused meanings. Dont worry about lack of knowledge of Polish language. I asked UserPiotrus if he could make survey of "My sources". So maybe You should start working with Him. I'm sure that He will be very happy with possibility of sharing effects of "his discoveries". As for synthesis and source (i.e. single source that connect some statements). Ok. But many of them are in cited Polish sources. And, as I said, article is still under construction, so there also will be add in near future additional materials (I assure you, that specially for you will be footnote with dirct reference to "He's got the whole world in his hands" and John Paul II - from source, which, as I know, will be published in june 2014; so please - a litlle patience!; and then UsePiotrus will check the content of source for you). Dont worry, be happy!
590:
from Life of Pope, all of them seems to be adequate to above mentioned prognostics. And in end I started add interpretations, which connect them and are made not by Me. So... You are just landed in middle of the proces (progress)... As for 3. - yes this will be made , as I said before (but you must wait to june 2014; for example: I wait also on permission use of photos , which will explain also some things). And personaly for now could you make list of parts, in which you wants footnotes? This will be helpful.. Besides; could you look on Wiki page: List of fulfilled prophecies. Because from start point some peoples accused Me that even those basic texts were not in connection to Pope. And yet: which prophecy is exact in connection to something? For example, why
Peoples on whole world have believe that prophecy about Virgin, who will save the France, find fulfilment in St Joan of Arc? And so on... Could You answer that question?
495:
original research - for now as I presume, no existent more (please check article). I put there 10 sources for confirmations of My thesis. Problem for You now may be so with that, that these sources are almost all in Polish (and only one is in
English), but as for this - this can be good exercise for User Piotrus (as Pole he should know, that I not giveth unchecked informations in this matter - but he didnt this). As for "Ignorant". I'm terribly sorry if You feel offend, but this will no more repeated... (but comments looked little like playing, I mean, that there was no sources, but I sended notice that I plan more references - I gave info for Kolbasz - and meantime there appear comments about lack of sources/ or references). Sorry also for not log, I just simply forgot... I will tried to be more carefully.
650:
border between France and the Duchy of
Lorraine, at the time many in France believed in her. Durand Laxart, Joan's uncle, who accompanied Joan on both of her journeys to Vaucouleurs, reported at the rehabilitation trial that Joan had told him: "Was it not said that France would be ruined through a woman and afterwards restored by a virgin?". It is known that such prophecies were widely known in France at around that time and that many in France among the supporters of the Dauphin identified Joan with the Maiden in the prophecies and this identification contributed to her popularity and following. Joan (who claimed divine guidance) led the French army to several important victories during the Hundred Years' War, which paved the way for the coronation of Charles VII
693:
understand from above mentioned work Mr
Ascherson, who observed and described this procces in one's of crucial moments. Yes I'm conscious that in the West is no knowledge of this, so part of My recent "problems" can also be connected with this. But Ok. I share with You. In weekend there will be more time, so I count on You (and for now not be offend but I have a necessary works, so I must answered to them, and I cannot watch Wiki disccusion for a few days, but in weekend will be OK). Rescius and specialy Markiewicz have strong bases in references, and I can also mention about them (I not reveal everything yet).
307:
646:
coming publication, I just will made footnote in advance for now (which is in practice). And in two weeks from now, you check reliability for yourself together with Polish
Dictionary. And remember latin sentence: summus jus summa injuria (as for prosecution and persecution for one footnote). And you not behave like devils of Mr Clive Staples Lewis. As for Joan of Arc I help you ("I can't see any such prophecy").
342:
142:
383:
240:
697:
prophecies (but I didnt speak about page of Joan of Arc), so You put together this by
Youself. But in reference to this page about fulfiled prophecies. I had give this to You as example that in Wiki there is plenty of pages which have less standards, then article about prophecies of John Paul II. So don't be so fast and hasty with judging. See You in weekend...
665:"In fact there are many sources speaking about poem of Julius Słowacki in reference to Pope John Paul II and His events. As I showed in footnotes." Please provide the citation numbers from your article for these. There is no such statement in your article which has a citation. The quote on oan of arc is not from the
712:
You haven't fixed the article at all.. Instead of insulting the other editors who post on the deletion page, which I see you've done again, you should try to understand what the problem is. You don't seem to understand how a
Knowledge article is put together and you don't seem interested in learning.
514:
An example to make this clear: It is not enough to have a source that says
Juliusz Słowacki wrote about a future Pope as “sacramental power he will show when he will take the world in his hand”, but not saying that this is about JPII. Then have a source saying Pope John Paul II is associated with the
728:
Dear DeCausa I appreciate Your labour. But probably when I must make choice between be with Pope, or be with Wiki hell's rules, I take the first thing. Peoples speak different things from different points of views and no matter how "neutral" rules are in conception, because everybody starts from own
589:
Answers: for 1. and 2. (as I think): Yes I've readed it, and I assure you that I not use sophistry. Problem as I see is based on different philosophies of working and appear rather from "abundancy". So I make this more clear. I first put original texts of prophecies as basic source, then I put facts
494:
Dear DeCausa I understand pretty well what You wants speak to Me. But You probably don't listens to Me... I told You that
Article is still under construction and that mean that still I'm learn Wiki terms. But I'm sensitive to all indications, whose were given to Me by Kolbasz. So "accusation" about:
692:
They speak about application of poem Mr Słowacki to Person John Paul II, and some events of His Life. Of course there are many more papers or books, whose connect this poem and Pope, but do You think that I have time to investigate them all? In Poland this is a matter of common knowledge as You can
688:
In
References, you have: Tomasz Królak, "1001 rzeczy ktore warto wiedziec o Janie Pawle II", Wydawnictwo M, Kraków 2010, page 55 - Antoni Dargas, "Jan Paweł II, syn narodu polskiego", Myśl Polska, Londyn 1978, page 54 - Neal Ascherson, "The Polish August: the self-limiting revolution", Allen Lane,
649:
Citation is: For some years before and around the time of activity of Joan of Arc, a number of vague prophecies concerning a young Maid who would save France were circulating. Some of these spoke of a Maid who was supposed to come from the "borders of Lorraine". Since Joan's village was near the
645:
In fact there are many sources speaking about poem of Julius Słowacki in reference to Pope John Paul II and His events. As I showed in footnotes. In reference for Wembley and Galway, this will be published in june 2014 (as I said two times). So when I know about this and know the content of this
510:
You call it "my thesis". That means it is your idea. That's what is meant by "original research" in Knowledge, and is not allowed. You are right, I don't read Polish. But I can not see a statement in the article that says "this prophecy is about John Paul II" with a source (even in Polish) cited
696:
As for: "The quote on oan of arc is not from the Joan of Arc article, which does not mention these prophecies. I see it is from Maid of Lorraine prophecies which should be deleted because there are no sources cited." You see, I told You then first time, that this is on page with list of fulfiled
605:
I didn't ask about sophistry. I asked about synthesis as that is defined in Knowledge ("Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources.") I think this may be the root of your misunderstanding. By "synthesis" we do not mean
615:
I think you are saying you do not yet have a source cited in the article which explicitly says "prophecy X is about Pope John Paul II". If that is so, the article will be deleted. You can recreate the article when you have found the sources making the connections. But when you do, you can only
689:
London 1981, page 123 - Czesław Ryszka, "Jan Paweł II Wielki", Edycja Święty Paweł, Częstochowa 2002, page 21 - Przemysław Owczarek, "Karol Wojtyła-Jan Paweł II: podhalańska opowieść o świętym : od historii do mitu-studium antropologiczne", Wydawnictwo Avalon, Kraków 2006, page 74 -
368:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
519:. You must have a single source that says that when Juliusz Słowacki wrote about "taking the world in his hands" this is about John Paul II because of the song he was associated with. It must be the source that makes the connection, not you.
412:
269:
616:
mention the prophecies which the sources have themselves linked to Pope John Paul II. You can't mention things which you think make the linkage. Finally, when you find the sources you can only use them if they satisfy the criteria in
515:
song "He's got the whole world in his hands", but not saying that this was prophesised by Juliusz Słowacki. You are not allowed under Knowledge rules to connect the two statements yourself. That's a type of original research called
418:
275:
625:
On your question about Joan of Arc, I don't think you've got the point. If a reliable source has discussed a prophecy about Joan of arc, that could go in her article. If no source has, then it can't. Looking at the article
372:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
365:
425:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
282:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
473:
Please make sure you always log in to your Jakub account when you edit Knowledge. If you have an account (which you have) you are not alowed to sometimes log in and sometimes not.
606:
there is anything wrong, in the "outside world", with the conclusion you reach. In other words, it doesn't have to be an invalid conclusion. The point of Knowledge is that we
729:
bases. So once again and sincerely thank You for Your attention. I will be remember about You in My prayers, and I think that after all you are nice guy and worthy fellow...
387:
244:
463:
to explain it to you in Polish (which I assume he speaks) if you are unsure. The point is we can only write articles when a lot of sources cover the same topic.
324:
556:? (This sets out the rule "Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources.")
354:
26:
64:
on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
78:
208:
470:. A personal attack includes calling other editors "ignorant", and you might not be allowed to continue to edit Knowledge if you do that.
112:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out
417:
411:
274:
268:
212:
610:
say what the sources say and nothing more. We are allowed only to make a conclusion if the sources make the conclusion for us.
456:
187:
467:
83:
68:
476:
Finally, please make sure you sign all your posts by typing ~~~~. This will automatically sign your account name for you.
445:
349:
333:
149:
135:
73:
42:
30:
670:
200:
153:
131:
451:
Jakub, I'm sure you mean well but you need to understand the problems with your article. Please note the following:
617:
204:
34:
358:
29:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as
730:
698:
651:
591:
535:
496:
88:
22:
105:
395:
252:
109:
560:
553:
394:
and Knowledge pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
391:
251:
and Knowledge pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
248:
216:
113:
459:. To stop the article being deleted you need to make sure the article complies with it. Maybe ask
98:
48:
718:
678:
635:
579:
524:
485:
434:
313:
306:
291:
224:
183:
169:
While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be
121:
57:
516:
511:
immediately after that statement. For it not to be "original research" you must have this.
52:, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type
738:
722:
706:
682:
659:
639:
599:
583:
543:
528:
504:
489:
438:
409:
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
320:
295:
266:
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
228:
125:
170:
93:
714:
713:
I've tried to help you, but I can see I've wasted my time. I won't bother further.
674:
631:
575:
570:
that each of the prophecies you mention in the article are about Pope John Paul II?
520:
481:
460:
430:
287:
220:
161:
117:
666:
627:
193:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing
382:
239:
669:
article, which does not mention these prophecies. I see it is from
366:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Prophecies about Pope John Paul II
40:
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called
403:
260:
46:. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the
673:
which should be deleted because there are no sources cited.
327:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
305:
140:
566:
Could you identify which of your citations in Polish says
347:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
211:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
176:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
353:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
312:Hello, Jakub Szymański. You have new messages at
559:Do you believe your article follows the rules in
549:Jakub, please can you answer three questions:
8:
116:or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
104:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
398:. There are two ways to do this. Either:
255:. There are two ways to do this. Either:
33:, may not conform to some of Knowledge's
406:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
263:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
182:notice, but please explain why in your
301:Re: Prophecies about Pope John Paul II
7:
355:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
446:Prophecies about Pope John Paul II
350:Prophecies about Pope John Paul II
334:Prophecies about Pope John Paul II
171:deleted for any of several reasons
156:because of the following concern:
150:Prophecies about Pope John Paul II
136:Prophecies about Pope John Paul II
31:Prophecies about Pope John Paul II
14:
364:The article will be discussed at
630:) I can't see any such prophecy.
421:) located above the edit window.
416:
410:
381:
340:
278:) located above the edit window.
273:
267:
238:
466:Also, there is another policy
457:Knowledge:No original research
1:
468:Knowledge:No personal attacks
89:The five pillars of Knowledge
79:Biographies of living persons
84:How to write a great article
37:, and may not be retained.
25:to Knowledge! Thank you for
21:Hello, Jakub Szymański, and
671:Maid of Lorraine prophecies
618:Knowledge: Reliable sources
215:allows discussion to reach
196:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
179:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
754:
390:. When you add content to
247:. When you add content to
207:exist. In particular, the
620:, which you need to read.
455:Please read this policy:
201:proposed deletion process
739:19:42, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
734:
723:19:07, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
707:17:36, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
702:
683:16:27, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
660:15:15, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
655:
640:12:49, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
600:12:21, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
595:
584:11:13, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
544:11:06, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
539:
529:06:22, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
505:22:06, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
500:
490:18:45, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
439:17:10, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
357:or whether it should be
321:14:29, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
296:14:26, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
229:13:14, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
126:13:14, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
234:Signing talk page posts
188:the article's talk page
310:
145:
309:
213:articles for deletion
154:proposed for deletion
144:
388:welcome to Knowledge
245:welcome to Knowledge
561:WIkipedia:Synthesis
554:Knowledge:Synthesis
314:Kolbasz's talk page
114:Knowledge:Questions
69:Starting an article
325:remove this notice
311:
205:deletion processes
146:
74:Your first article
43:Your first article
27:your contributions
444:Your posts about
377:Your recent edits
162:Original research
132:Proposed deletion
745:
420:
414:
385:
344:
343:
328:
277:
271:
242:
198:
197:
181:
180:
143:
62:
56:
753:
752:
748:
747:
746:
744:
743:
742:
731:Jakub Szymański
699:Jakub Szymański
652:Jakub Szymański
592:Jakub Szymański
536:Jakub Szymański
497:Jakub Szymański
449:
396:sign your posts
379:
345:
341:
338:
329:
318:
303:
253:sign your posts
236:
209:speedy deletion
195:
194:
178:
177:
141:
139:
60:
54:
19:
12:
11:
5:
751:
749:
726:
725:
686:
685:
643:
642:
622:
621:
612:
611:
587:
586:
573:
572:
571:
564:
557:
552:Have you read
532:
531:
512:
478:
477:
474:
471:
464:
448:
442:
423:
422:
407:
378:
375:
339:
337:
332:Nomination of
330:
319:Message added
317:
304:
302:
299:
280:
279:
264:
235:
232:
219:for deletion.
199:will stop the
167:
166:
138:
129:
110:sign your name
102:
101:
96:
91:
86:
81:
76:
71:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
750:
741:
740:
736:
732:
724:
720:
716:
711:
710:
709:
708:
704:
700:
694:
690:
684:
680:
676:
672:
668:
664:
663:
662:
661:
657:
653:
647:
641:
637:
633:
629:
624:
623:
619:
614:
613:
609:
604:
603:
602:
601:
597:
593:
585:
581:
577:
574:
569:
565:
562:
558:
555:
551:
550:
548:
547:
546:
545:
541:
537:
530:
526:
522:
518:
513:
509:
508:
507:
506:
502:
498:
492:
491:
487:
483:
475:
472:
469:
465:
462:
458:
454:
453:
452:
447:
443:
441:
440:
436:
432:
429:Thank you. --
427:
419:
413:
408:
405:
401:
400:
399:
397:
393:
389:
384:
376:
374:
370:
367:
362:
360:
356:
352:
351:
335:
331:
326:
322:
315:
308:
300:
298:
297:
293:
289:
284:
276:
270:
265:
262:
258:
257:
256:
254:
250:
246:
241:
233:
231:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
191:
189:
185:
174:
172:
165:
163:
159:
158:
157:
155:
151:
137:
133:
130:
128:
127:
123:
119:
115:
111:
107:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
80:
77:
75:
72:
70:
67:
66:
65:
63:
59:
51:
50:
45:
44:
38:
36:
32:
28:
24:
16:
727:
695:
691:
687:
648:
644:
607:
588:
567:
533:
493:
479:
461:User:Piotrus
450:
428:
424:
380:
371:
363:
348:
346:
336:for deletion
285:
281:
237:
203:, but other
192:
184:edit summary
175:
168:
160:
148:The article
147:
103:
53:
47:
41:
39:
20:
667:Joan of Arc
628:Joan of Arc
286:Thank you.
568:explicitly
392:talk pages
386:Hello and
323:. You can
249:talk pages
243:Hello and
106:Wikipedian
94:Help pages
35:guidelines
517:synthesis
402:Add four
259:Add four
217:consensus
152:has been
108:! Please
480:Thanks.
99:Tutorial
49:Teahouse
17:Welcome!
715:DeCausa
675:DeCausa
632:DeCausa
576:DeCausa
521:DeCausa
482:DeCausa
431:SineBot
359:deleted
288:Kolbasz
221:Kolbasz
118:Kolbasz
58:help me
23:welcome
404:tildes
261:tildes
186:or on
735:talk
719:talk
703:talk
679:talk
656:talk
636:talk
608:only
596:talk
580:talk
540:talk
525:talk
501:talk
486:talk
435:talk
292:talk
225:talk
122:talk
415:or
272:or
134:of
737:)
721:)
705:)
681:)
658:)
638:)
598:)
582:)
542:)
527:)
503:)
488:)
437:)
361:.
294:)
227:)
190:.
173:.
124:)
61:}}
55:{{
733:(
717:(
701:(
677:(
654:(
634:(
626:(
594:(
578:(
563:?
538:(
523:(
499:(
484:(
433:(
316:.
290:(
223:(
164:.
120:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.