1135:
true that the "reliable source" (The
Huffington Post - are you kidding me?) ended with the statement "The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit is reviewing the case and is responsible for the release of the documents." HOWEVER, a reading of the opinion of that court (note - not a final opinion) makes clear that 1) the original investigation against Scott Walker and his political allies had no basis in law or fact, 2) the original investigation was thrown out several times by different judges, and 3) the "review" is at the behest of the victims of the investigation who are in essence countersuing, stating that their first amendment rights were violated by the investigators.
627:
person could consider the edit you reference to be disruptive. I personally find it to be excellent, even reviewing it now 6 weeks later. So thank you for so clearly demonstrating that
Knowledge (XXG) is a dishonest, agenda driven load of horse manure. It's really embarrassing for Knowledge (XXG) to hold on to such thoroughly discredited, antiquated, silly ideas like global warming to the point where you won't even admit there is an alternative viewpoint, even as record cold strikes the northern hemisphere. You're just a bunch of scared, whiny intellectual fascists, and I stand by every edit I have made.
1144:" . . . The Defendants must cease all activities related to the investigation, return all property seized in the investigation from any individual or organization, and permanently destroy all copies of information and other materials obtained through the investigation. Plaintiffs and others are hereby relieved of any and every duty under Wisconsin law to cooperate further with Defendants' investigation. Any attempt to obtain compliance by any Defendant or John Doe Judge Gregory Peterson (sic) is grounds for a contempt finding by this Court. Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 6th day of May, 2014."
1036:) 05:54, 4 May 2013 (UTC) Ah, but it was factual, which was my point. Knowledge (XXG) is opposed to truth as such. Knowledge must first pass through a tyrannical, smothering, third party PC filter before it can be displayed. The purpose of Knowledge (XXG) is nothing more than highly polished propaganda. No one has ever been able to make the case that anything I have posted is inaccurate, only that it doesn't meet Knowledge (XXG)' standards, because the standard is not truth, but secular humanist homogenization.
852:
and whether the echo chamber mainstream media chooses to recognize that or not. It is actually quite embarrassing that when hard evidence is presented that Mr. Obama was born in Kenya, that the immediate response is that the information was in error - for 16 years??? That simply does not pass the laugh test. No professional could survive with that sort of thinking process, whether that professional be an accountant, a physician or an engineer.
532:
277:
923:
747:
691:
1085:
902:) 03:36, 26 September 2012 (UTC) My bad. I forgot that high quality close up uncut audio with sound of the actual event was not verifiable. Something meets Knowledge (XXG) standards only when the echo chamber of the mainstream media states it, even if they just plain make it up. I'll drop the antiquated notions of proof, truth and evidence and try to do better next time.
879:
650:
400:
361:
177:
1159:
The above analysis is ORIGINAL RESEARCH, which is forbidden by
Knowledge (XXG). Only if a liberal, politically correct publication regurgitates some information can it then be considered "verifiable by a reliable source." And no source that meets Knowledge (XXG)'s approval as a "reliable source" will
1051:
It may be that no one has made the case to your satisfaction, but it would be easy enough to make the case. I won't bother to do so now, since it's clear from your reply that your mind is already made up. In any event, Knowledge (XXG) deals in verifiable fact, not "truth", the latter being subjective
626:
Thank you for this. The "disruptive edit" you refer to is possibly the most perfect example of the obvious and I believe deliberate bias in
Knowledge (XXG). Please don't remove the link, so that it may stand as a clear example of how useless Knowledge (XXG) is. I do not believe any rational or honest
1134:
In the Scott Walker entry (at least right now - it will change, but never because of facts or truth), the section entitled "Investigation of alleged illegal fundraising" ends with a grossly misleading statement "The United States Court of
Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is reviewing the case." It is
851:
Your sources are not reliable. They are merely an echo chamber of cover up. I question the entire validity of what you have just posted, and the entire premise of this article as a fringe theory. Questions about Barack Obama's origins are now mainstream, whether you choose to recognize that or not,
496:
My addition indicated that the big bang, speciation, and dinosaur behavior were neither observable nor repeatable. Is this factually incorrect? Is it irrelevant to a discussion of the nature of science? Or does it not fit comfortably with the POV that evolution theory is truth? I fail to see how a
610:
I am blocking you for 24 hours for disruptive editing. You are welcome to appeal the block, which is your chance to see if another admin thinks it is fair. A whole series of editors and admins have given you warning above about adding obvious personal opinion into articles but you persist
339:
deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with
Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines.
1130:
I came today to edit the entry for Scott Walker only to find I have been blocked, because Kww believes that pointing out that
Muslims kill people somehow means I am not here to "build the encyclopedia." Except that Muslims really do kill people and everyone knows it. Everyone.
829:
Please note that claims dealt with in this article are considered fringe theories per the current consensus regarding the reliable sources as documented on this article's talk page, as well as on the Barack Obama FAQ page. Additionally, this article is subject to
1141:"the defendants' legal theory cannot pass constitutional muster. The plaintiffs have been shut out of the political process merely by association with conservative politicians. This cannot square with the First Amendment and what it was meant to protect.
614:. I have gone through several pages of your edits and you come close to qualifying for an indefinite block as a Vandal only account. Please consider the objections people make and listen. You will become a better editor when you do so. --
1000:
You're kidding me. A photograph with the official policies views of the SFMTA is not reliable? These were not a joke. Knowledge (XXG) is. But what should I expect from an organization that thinks Obama's long form birth certificate is
444:, which pages have both been fairly stable and non-controversial entries for several years, put this source in a most high position. Please explain why this source does not meet Knowledge (XXG)'s standards for citation.
1147:
This is a slap down in the extreme. The investigation is clearly shown to have had no valid basis in law or fact, and those who investigated Scott Walker were dead wrong AND THE JUDGE HAS SAID AS MUCH in legal terms.
1052:
except within certain like-thinking groups of individuals. Likely enough, that frustrates you to no end—it occasionally frustrates me too—but it's something we each of us must deal with: when editing articles,
459:
Since no response has been offered in 3 months time, I will consider this criticism to be unfounded and retracted. I will continue to provide relevant, factual, and well sourced edits in the future.
436:
was factual, relevant, and well sourced. It is outrageous that you do not consider the Umdat al-Salik to be an authoritative source on
Islamic jurisprudence. Even the Knowledge (XXG) entries for the
566:
What in the hell are you talking about? The point of my edit was that there ARE no official references to Obama's birth location. Note that the above criticism is both unfounded and unsigned.
1127:
It appears that
Wikipedians are continuing to pursue their goal of choking off truth in favor of politically correct consensus under the false banner of "verifiability by reliable sources."
855:
Besides that, I did not do any reverts on that article - I was reverted three times myself, for posting neutral, balanced, referenced information, so you are posting to the wrong user.
30:
662:
831:
1163:
So don't look to
Knowledge (XXG) for truth. Don't waste your time at all. The is no honesty here, only an amoral tasteless liberal echo chamber run by tiny tyrants.
1020:
Hello, Jwbaumann. I see you've been around for a while and that others have templated you before with regard to basic content policies, so I won't template you now.
758:
1193:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kww_and_The_Rambling_Man/Proposed_decision#Kww_has_previously_used_admin_tools_while_involved
1101:
887:
544:
126:
183:
to Knowledge (XXG), and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Knowledge (XXG) is that articles should always be written from a
1192:
70:
511:
The absence of any response tells me that this criticism was meritless. I will continue to offer relevant, factual edits as opportunities arise.
247:
240:
226:
653:
Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed,
1104:, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
979:
source (I assume the sources you added before were a joke, because you can't possibly think they're appropriate) that has figured it out. –
130:
38:
1191:
It appears the admin who blocked me permanently has himself been booted from Knowledge (XXG) for abusing his sysop powers. Tiny tyrant.
369:
331:
931:
412:
373:
233:
184:
99:
798:
404:
365:
104:
1160:
ever report what I have reported above, because it does not fit the liberal narrative Knowledge (XXG) supports (NPOV be damned).
478:
I see from this page you have already been warned several times to avoid putting personal commentary into articles. I see it has
437:
325:
284:
270:
535:
Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Knowledge (XXG) page, as you did at
988:
947:
899:
34:
927:
810:
766:
60:
814:
658:
129:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
205:
883:
300:
935:
820:
707:
673:. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you.
548:
75:
1097:
762:
695:
94:
84:
654:
642:
703:
665:. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.
304:
109:
806:
778:
754:
712:
Such a bold statement requires some very reliable sources which directly makes the claim you are trying to make.
192:
180:
55:
50:
122:
1166:
It is true, I am not here to build the encyclopedia. I am here for truth. Those are incompatible missions.
1154:
834:, and editors are being held to a higher standard here than might be the case elsewhere on Knowledge (XXG).
296:
89:
676:
588:
FYI, here is the link to the "unreferenced controversial biographical content" to which DKqwerty refers:
802:
770:
345:
670:
37:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers, and some key
1068:
1059:
us all to check our points of view at the door. Fwiw, I've heard that various other wikis, including
1033:
1028:, and the final sentence was wildly inappropriate for article space. Please avoid making such edits.
718:
260:
147:
295:
for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on
984:
943:
895:
843:
957:
That was not personal analysis. That was the plain meaning of their large sign. Can you not read?
886:
information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Knowledge (XXG) about
556:
188:
169:
1138:
Quoting from the judge's opinion (note - this is a preliminary injunction, not a final ruling):
773:
rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
540:
310:
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding
487:
386:
291:, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see
201:
1053:
1025:
292:
217:
139:
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
1113:
1105:
341:
288:
1064:
1029:
714:
618:
590:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Barack_Obama&diff=301961906&oldid=301936565
315:
256:
143:
1195:
1173:
1037:
1002:
980:
958:
939:
903:
891:
859:
838:
728:
628:
592:
575:
567:
512:
498:
460:
445:
416:
531:
287:
requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under
276:
1093:
552:
329:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
65:
536:
483:
379:
196:
1092:. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living personon
1109:
1089:
157:
615:
788:; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
661:. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at
934:
by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be
441:
801:
to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents
1155:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/230471840/Scott-Walker-Investigation-Documents
1084:
649:
482:. This is your final warning - if you do it again, you will be blocked.
399:
360:
221:
policy that apply directly to intelligent design related articles are:
176:
1203:
1181:
1117:
1072:
1045:
1010:
992:
966:
951:
911:
867:
846:
786:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made
736:
722:
679:
636:
621:
600:
583:
560:
520:
506:
491:
468:
453:
425:
392:
349:
263:
210:
150:
497:
relevant, factual statement is a violation of the TOS. Please explain.
415:
and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
376:
and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
699:
433:
408:
161:
1060:
797:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
574:) 05:37, 14 July 2009 (UTC) And boom, now the above is signed.
165:
745:
335:
explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for
275:
44:
813:. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
663:
Knowledge (XXG):General sanctions/Climate change probation
975:
If the meaning is "plain," you should be able to cite a
1021:
612:
589:
479:
805:
among editors. You can post a request for help at an
1096:, but that you didn’t support your changes with a
792:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
187:. It appears you have not followed this policy at
1100:. Knowledge (XXG) has a strict policy concerning
1151:Read the source documents yourself, right here:
930:. If you continue to violate Knowledge (XXG)'s
727:I can't help it if you don't like the sources.
702:. This contravenes Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on
215:Please note that sections of Knowledge (XXG)'s
539:. Content of this nature could be regarded as
289:section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
858:"Evil so foul, a Wikipedian almost noticed."
16:"Evil so foul, a Wikipedian almost noticed."
8:
759:Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories
407:to Knowledge (XXG) articles, as you did to
368:to Knowledge (XXG) articles, as you did to
285:Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield
271:Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield
757:according to the reverts you have made on
299:subjects and should provide references to
121:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
1123:Fnck Knowledge (XXG). Fnck it in the a**.
753:You currently appear to be engaged in an
403:Please do not add commentary or your own
364:Please do not add commentary or your own
779:Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on edit warring
706:. If you continue to do so, you may be
131:Knowledge (XXG):Where to ask a question
411:. Doing so violates Knowledge (XXG)'s
372:. Doing so violates Knowledge (XXG)'s
7:
1172:So long Knowledge (XXG). You suck.
817:. If you engage in an edit war, you
370:political positions of Barack Obama
133:, ask me on my talk page, or place
882:Please do not add unreferenced or
241:NPOV: Making necessary assumptions
14:
432:Everything I submitted regarding
1102:how we write about living people
1083:
921:
877:
689:
648:
530:
398:
359:
175:
710:from editing Knowledge (XXG).
551:from editing Knowledge (XXG).
547:. If you continue, you will be
255:Hope you find that helpful, ..
912:18:46, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
777:Please be particularly aware,
765:with others, to avoid editing
56:Knowledge (XXG)'s Five Pillars
1:
1118:07:31, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
1098:citation to a reliable source
723:06:45, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
680:09:22, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
622:16:30, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
492:01:47, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
426:13:22, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
393:22:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
264:07:04, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
248:NPOV: Giving "equal validity"
211:00:12, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
151:23:41, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
1063:, have no such requirement.
932:neutral point of view policy
521:18:50, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
413:neutral point of view policy
374:neutral point of view policy
350:03:44, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
191:. Please always observe our
71:How to write a great article
1024:was a blatant violation of
1011:02:01, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
993:00:00, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
967:21:02, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
952:04:33, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
637:06:51, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
1219:
737:16:54, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
655:Global warming controversy
643:Global warming controversy
507:06:21, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
454:07:01, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
31:welcome to Knowledge (XXG)
1182:20:49, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
584:05:54, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
561:05:42, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
469:05:47, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
283:A tag has been placed on
1204:18:08, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
1199:
1177:
1041:
1006:
962:
907:
868:17:36, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
863:
847:04:44, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
771:try to reach a consensus
761:. Users are expected to
732:
632:
601:18:08, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
596:
579:
571:
516:
502:
464:
449:
1073:17:37, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
1046:14:21, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
807:appropriate noticeboard
698:content, as you did to
543:and is in violation of
332:the article's talk page
39:policies and guidelines
750:
545:Knowledge (XXG) policy
280:
1016:"Preprocessed truth"?
749:
279:
218:Neutral Point of View
185:neutral point of view
100:Neutral point of view
936:blocked from editing
293:Knowledge (XXG):Stub
105:No original research
694:Please stop adding
355:February 2008 edits
269:Speedy deletion of
227:NPOV: Pseudoscience
156:Your edits made on
928:disruptive editing
811:dispute resolution
751:
606:Disruptive editing
281:
234:NPOV: Undue weight
189:Intelligent Design
170:Intelligent Design
61:How to edit a page
35:your contributions
926:Please stop your
884:poorly referenced
832:article probation
671:templated message
659:article probation
423:
405:personal analysis
366:personal analysis
209:
119:
118:
1210:
1169:I choose truth.
1087:
925:
924:
881:
880:
748:
693:
692:
652:
534:
421:
417:
402:
389:
382:
363:
321:
320:
314:
307:their content.
301:reliable sources
199:
179:
137:
45:
33:. Thank you for
1218:
1217:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1189:
1125:
1081:
1018:
922:
919:
878:
875:
815:page protection
746:
744:
690:
687:
669:The above is a
646:
608:
528:
480:not stopped you
476:
419:
387:
380:
357:
318:
312:
311:
274:
173:
140:
135:
120:
76:Manual of Style
23:
12:
11:
5:
1216:
1214:
1188:
1185:
1124:
1121:
1108:. Thank you.
1080:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1017:
1014:
998:
997:
996:
995:
970:
969:
918:
915:
890:. Thank you. –
888:living persons
874:
873:September 2012
871:
827:
826:
795:
794:
789:
774:
743:
740:
686:
683:
667:
666:
645:
640:
607:
604:
564:
527:
524:
475:
472:
457:
456:
438:Umdat al-Salik
429:
428:
356:
353:
273:
267:
253:
252:
244:
237:
230:
172:
154:
127:sign your name
117:
116:
113:
112:
107:
102:
97:
95:External links
92:
87:
85:Citing sources
80:
79:
78:
73:
68:
63:
58:
53:
43:
22:
19:
18:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1215:
1206:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1194:
1186:
1184:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1170:
1167:
1164:
1161:
1157:
1156:
1152:
1149:
1145:
1142:
1139:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1122:
1120:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1094:Martin Bashir
1091:
1086:
1079:November 2013
1078:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1061:Conservapedia
1058:
1055:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1015:
1013:
1012:
1008:
1004:
994:
990:
986:
982:
978:
974:
973:
972:
971:
968:
964:
960:
956:
955:
954:
953:
949:
945:
941:
937:
933:
929:
916:
914:
913:
909:
905:
901:
897:
893:
889:
885:
872:
870:
869:
865:
861:
856:
853:
849:
848:
845:
842:
841:
836:
835:
833:
824:
823:from editing.
822:
816:
812:
808:
804:
800:
793:
790:
787:
784:
783:
782:
780:
775:
772:
768:
764:
760:
756:
741:
739:
738:
734:
730:
725:
724:
720:
716:
713:
709:
705:
704:verifiability
701:
697:
685:February 2012
684:
682:
681:
678:
674:
672:
664:
660:
656:
651:
644:
641:
639:
638:
634:
630:
624:
623:
620:
617:
613:
605:
603:
602:
598:
594:
591:
586:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
563:
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
542:
538:
533:
525:
523:
522:
518:
514:
509:
508:
504:
500:
494:
493:
489:
485:
481:
474:Final warning
473:
471:
470:
466:
462:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
430:
427:
424:
422:
414:
410:
406:
401:
397:
396:
395:
394:
391:
390:
384:
383:
375:
371:
367:
362:
354:
352:
351:
347:
343:
338:
334:
333:
328:
327:
317:
308:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
278:
272:
268:
266:
265:
262:
258:
251:
249:
245:
243:
242:
238:
236:
235:
231:
229:
228:
224:
223:
222:
220:
219:
213:
212:
207:
203:
198:
194:
193:core policies
190:
186:
182:
178:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
153:
152:
149:
145:
138:
132:
128:
124:
115:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
82:
81:
77:
74:
72:
69:
67:
64:
62:
59:
57:
54:
52:
49:
48:
47:
46:
42:
40:
36:
32:
28:
20:
17:
1190:
1171:
1168:
1165:
1162:
1158:
1153:
1150:
1146:
1143:
1140:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1126:
1106:my talk page
1082:
1056:
1019:
999:
976:
920:
917:October 2012
876:
857:
854:
850:
839:
828:
825:
818:
796:
791:
785:
776:
767:disruptively
752:
726:
711:
688:
668:
647:
625:
609:
587:
565:
537:Barack Obama
529:
510:
495:
477:
458:
418:
385:
377:
358:
336:
330:
323:
309:
282:
254:
246:
239:
232:
225:
216:
214:
174:
141:
134:
114:
51:Introduction
26:
24:
15:
1088:Hello, I'm
1001:legitimate.
763:collaborate
342:KurtRaschke
324:the top of
158:September 2
1065:Rivertorch
1030:Rivertorch
715:Dougweller
541:defamatory
257:dave souza
144:dave souza
136:{{helpme}}
123:Wikipedian
90:Copyrights
1196:Jwbaumann
1174:Jwbaumann
1038:Jwbaumann
1022:This edit
1003:Jwbaumann
981:Roscelese
959:Jwbaumann
940:Roscelese
904:Jwbaumann
892:Roscelese
860:Jwbaumann
803:consensus
799:talk page
781:states:
769:, and to
729:Jwbaumann
696:unsourced
629:Jwbaumann
593:Jwbaumann
576:Jwbaumann
568:Jwbaumann
526:July 2009
513:Jwbaumann
499:Jwbaumann
461:Jwbaumann
446:Jwbaumann
420:ITAQALLAH
125:! Please
27:Jwbaumann
1187:May 2017
1057:requires
989:contribs
977:reliable
948:contribs
900:contribs
809:or seek
755:edit war
742:May 2012
657:, is on
553:DKqwerty
440:and for
326:the page
1054:WP:NPOV
1026:WP:NPOV
821:blocked
819:may be
708:blocked
549:blocked
484:Raul654
442:Shafi`i
381:jersyko
297:notable
197:GSlicer
181:Welcome
25:Hello,
21:Welcome
1110:Prolog
1090:Prolog
337:speedy
316:hangon
305:verify
29:, and
844:wales
700:Islam
616:BozMo
434:Jihad
409:Jihad
303:that
168:) to
1200:talk
1178:talk
1114:talk
1069:talk
1042:talk
1034:talk
1007:talk
985:talk
963:talk
944:talk
938:. –
908:talk
896:talk
864:talk
840:Rich
733:talk
719:talk
633:talk
619:talk
597:talk
580:talk
572:talk
557:talk
517:talk
503:talk
488:talk
465:talk
450:talk
388:talk
346:talk
261:talk
162:2007
148:talk
66:Help
675:--
322:to
195:.
166:UTC
41::
1202:)
1180:)
1116:)
1071:)
1044:)
1009:)
991:)
987:⋅
965:)
950:)
946:⋅
910:)
898:⋅
866:)
837:—
735:)
721:)
677:TS
635:)
599:)
582:)
559:)
519:)
505:)
490:)
467:)
452:)
378:·
348:)
319:}}
313:{{
259:,
204:•
160:,
146:,
142:..
1198:(
1176:(
1112:(
1067:(
1040:(
1032:(
1005:(
983:(
961:(
942:(
906:(
894:(
862:(
731:(
717:(
631:(
595:(
578:(
570:(
555:(
515:(
501:(
486:(
463:(
448:(
344:(
250:.
208:)
206:c
202:t
200:(
164:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
