User talk:Ratemonth - Knowledge (XXG)

3196:

there's a reference, there will be re-runs that will depicted Finn as 12 years old and maybe they'll show an episode as him being 14 after; there's must be an explanation explaining the beginning to the end. What I'm trying to say is, you can't have a relationship (Girlfriend/Boyfriend) if they weren't friends to begin with. If there's any further question or misunderstanding, please, see the article talk page; I'll be there and we can talk about it more. I have never disagree with you at any point, I just want to make things less confusing for other readers.

2725: 2758: 2741: 2396: 2251: 2143: 1010: 2736: 3802:

articles of the Venezuelan government. I understand your confusion, but I would hope that you tone down your aggressive writing style as it is not conducive to team work or article creation. If you would care to view and translate (as I have) the articles to English, you will find that it is in fact without question that the articles of the constitution were not adhered to (if that is the euphemism you want for 'violated').

4530: 3404: 1626: 1541: 924: 5120: 2753: 2720: 1979: 4037: 4631: 4431: 4308: 4829: 4994: 4136: 1337: 758: 513: 711: 671: 628: 1450:

Rory: Must be like a recording or something. Doctor: No it's not. It's the emergancy proticals of course the TARDIS sealed off the control room to save her, she is right at the heart of explosion.' Implying that she dies but the TARDIS captures a moment and saves it untill the Doctor completes the savour. Stop changing it. Thank you

3336:

the wrong thing to do! I always check the policies and guidelines of Knowledge (XXG) and I don't always do the wrong thing! An administrator has told me that if I was going to use information on a page, then I have to put it into my own words to prevent plagiarism! Can you please tell me how I am plagiarizing that page!

3229:

Hello R. I didn't get to leave an edit summary but as another editor beat me to the page but there is a source for the September date. It is attached to the date mentioned for Asylum for the Daleks in the 7th season table. IMO it doesn't need to be in two different places but if you want to attach it

2214:

I do appreciate the comment from you on my talk page. I respectfully disagree on the "pov", though I am happy to discuss possible alternate wordings on the talk page for the article. As for the redundancy - I feel that is incomplete to leave essentially no summary of the article above the contents.

1253:

I think the Sanford debate will never end, lol. I have 3 sources that are still discussing Mark Sanford in conjunction to 2012 that are less than 6 months old, but JerzeyKydd is still insisting that discussion for him has ceased for 6 months. The sources I added are less than 6 months. I agreed to

1233:

If you or anyone else can provide a reputable source stating she doesn't consider herself a practicing Jew, please do. Until that is provided the information should remain. And regardless of her religion, the information about her parents is properly cited and there is no reason for it to be deleted.

588:

is a novel) in the removed cite (also present—the last time I checked, which was quite a while back, I admit—are new annotations by the author). Of course, "the canonicity of spin off fiction is unclear," but the point is that this is not "fansite spam"; anyone reading this article is going to have a

577:

article where you removed the cited source for a lengthy passage and replaced it with a "citation request" tag, attaching an edit summary reading, "removing non-canon fansite spam." This last, unfortunately, is almost completely inapplicable to the situation. A fan site (by the New Zealand Doctor Who

4931:

Why can't the white pride page be changed? Are you implying that all proud white people are racist neonazis? Well,making stereotypes over a race is racist,isn't it? I hereby ask that you change the text of the page into one that does not portray the white people as being racist. Why can't you add

4392:

to discuss the issue. I think the onus is on the unregistered editor (who made the first edit) to explain, but I feel I should let you know as well, especially as you have already made three reversions. The other editor has already made four reversions; if that editor reverts it again, I will make a

4113:

The above warning, although pertinent, was procedural. I couldn't warn or block one without warning the other. Now that you have read it you may remove the warning yourself (the IP has since been blocked for disruption in other areas), but please don't let yourself be goaded into such

4066:

on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit

3288:

Well, have you seen an election page with 5/6 candidates and 3 different rows? I sure haven't. Normally election pages with 5/6 candidates have only 2 rows for the candidates. If you can show me an election page on wiki that has 3 rows AND less than 7 different candidates on display, I would love

3178:

Sorry for using the exclamation point; I wasn't shouting. The information that you provided isn't actual fact, but your own personal view. Throughout the episode "Burning low", Flame Princess, herself, never have emotionally, physically, or verbally stated that she is in love with Finn or see him as

2047:

I've noticed that you remove candidates that don't have sources associated with them. I understand your reason that things need to be verifiable, but in most cases they really are candidates and someone just didn't post an article. This is just a suggestion, but it might be better to just look up an

3801:

Referring to my request for improvement as 'stupid' is simply another notion that perhaps you need to call it a day, as you are putting your editorial history on the line currently. To answer your aggressive commentary on my page, I included two links, not one, one of which was a direct link to the

3335:

I went online to see what the summary of the episode was about. When I saw the description, I used some of the dialogue, but put most of it into my own work! I don't see why you keep accusing me of plagiarism because I didn't just DIRECTLY copy the work onto Knowledge (XXG) when I know that that is

2664:

consistent with the infoboxtemplate that are used in the whole primary article serie. It is important for a high quality article serie to be internal consistent. I think the best place for you to start making comments and edits would be in the Template. The consensus reached on its talkpage will be

1048:

Myself and Timmeh have had a strong discussion about major change to this article. Before we did anything we wanted to get feedback regular editors of this page, William S. Saturn, Hysteria18, Jerzeykydd, Ratemonth, JayJasper, GoodDay, Qqqqqq, GageSkidmore, Reywas92, and FallenMorgan. Please send

3195:

I just revised back to the last compromised that we both agree on a month ago. Also, there need to be a history that leads to there or people will keep changing it; like Finn's age for example. People change it because there's no connecting history that lead up to the provided information. Even if

1781:

The citation from magazine Monitor was removed by user NetLink2010 because the article cited from that magazine is not founded on facts, rather on uncertain implications and speculations. The accusation of money laundering can seriously harm Knežević's reputation on both domestic and international

1211:

Why do you keep reverting the edits to that page? Several people have been trying to remove the unnecessary and unsubstantiated information about her religion. She recently went on the Dallas Morning News and said she is not a practicing Jew and does not associate with the religion. Please refrain

491:

My edit to the episode list on the Regular show is consistent with statements made on Deviantart and twitter from J.G. Quintel himself and Benton Connor. The script for Parental Controls leaked on a puppet account of J.Q. Quintel, "MightyBooshFan." Please don't re-edit my posts claiming vandalism.

3862:

explained where the dubious info is coming from. I find it frustrating when people keep trying to import info from Wikia thinking it is a usable source. I do think that edit was good faith albeit misguided and probably should not have been tagged as vandalism when reverted. I dropped the editor a

3774:

I do not think that calling individuals "liars" is an effective way to participate in edit dialogue. Additionally I found that repeatedly you do not cite any summaries for your rapid fire edits. Perhaps you should address these to be a more positive contributor to sources, as it stands I found it

2963:

PRB, a financial representative of the TMR on the international scene has caused a stir. Its programmers have invented the three names of the republic: Trans-Dniester Moldavian Republic (TMR), Pridnestrovskaya Moldavskaya Respublica (PMR), Moldova (Transdniestria). The coloring of the PRB and the

1866:

is however a spin-off of Doctor Who... The time slot this show has been given (mid Doctor season) might suggest a crossover. Even if this should turn out not to be the case it might be of interest to Doctor Who fans that do not live in the UK and are dependent upon Knowledge (XXG) as one of their

535:

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to the other, even if you don't normally use the version the article is written in. Respect other people's versions of English. They in turn should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Knowledge (XXG) articles are

1449:

Stop editing for 2 reasons. 1) The grammer is the wrong tense, and you change it and insist that it's a spelling error your wrong, everyone else is correct. And about River implied she died is right as this is the exact words about the exploding TARDIS Amy: That's River, how can she be up there?

527:

For subjects exclusively related to Britain (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to other English-speaking countries, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the

4927:

Please edit the white pride page. The pride pages for all other races and minorities have positive remarks,but the White Pride page is filled with racial hatred against white people. For example: White pride is a slogan primarily used by white separatist, white nationalist, neo-Nazi and white

2959:

November 29, 2000 in accordance with the recommendations of the UN by former President PMR - Smirnov issued a decree № 591 "On the transliteration and place names", according to which the name of the Transnistria in the Latin alphabet was established as Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublica

3890:

does not require that our sources are neutral, only that the articles we write with those sources are neutral. However, there were more things wrong with that source than being biased. I would've cited "self-published" as a reason not to use that source or "not supported by a reputable

1149:

Oh good. Someone was able to do some improvements on my initial attempts. Also good find on endorsements for Schaffer; I was hoping someone could add more info on the other candidates (I'm a Perry supporter so I tend to stick with working that side of the article).

4951:

You asked for a couple of days see if anyone objected to putting back the non-notable candidates on more than two ballots. Not a single person has registered a single one. I presume that this is a consensus. Have a Merry Christmas...T-Minus fifty days and counting.

1500:

I have the book proof in front of me (supplier by the publishers) so I know what I am talking about. I can if required include this information in an official site and link to it. Would that satisfy you desire to remove things you know nothing about?

3556:

God how do you even come up with such terrible excuses? The fact about the two shorts were true on the Regular Show page and same with the air date for the Adventure Time pilot. You've probably never even watched Regular Show and Adventure Time before.

5132:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

472:'undoing unexplained changes' - ??? References to authoritative sources of the Constitution of Moldova, as well as, legislation of Transnistria, Legislation of Morldovy are ... Read them please... Cancel your disposal, as unfounded. Regards, -- 4608: 3603:

I was extremely bemused to see you remove the surplus vote section. It already has three references - 2 from Ha'aretz and one from the Jerusalem Post. By all means remove the unreferenced stuff, but don't remove stuff that has citations. Thanks,

1409:

What bothers me is that a 2,000-word article on such a contentious political figure doesn't mention his party affiliation. This is as credible as a piece on George W. Bush without the word Republican, or one on Barack Obama without a Democrat.

939:

prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the

3775:

quite difficult to follow your edits, though I did agree with the formatting on several of them. The goal is to get a consensus and team work, and a quality, truthful, and unbiased article. Both of the above mentioned practices hinder that.

2318:

in New Hampshire, they qualify as candidates, as well as real people. The State of New Hampshire requires that candidates be genuine human beings. The Green Papers got these names from the NH government, and that should be good enough for

815:

and newcomers (Govs. Bobby Jindal of Louisiana; Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota; Charlie Crist of Florida; Mark Sanford and Sen. Lindsay Graham of South Carolina; former Ohio Rep. Rob Portman and some folks nobody is thinking about right now)."

1891:

Hi, Doctor Who will return with the last episodes of season 6 in September not in August. "The series will run for seven initial episodes, then take a two-month hiatus after a massive cliffhanger and return to BBC One in September." -:

1277:

There seems to be yet another debate over Mark Sanford and now whether not Bobby Jindal should remain on this page. Since you are an editor on this page, I was hoping you would be interested in joining the discussion at the link below.

603:'s novel is where it was first stated outright in something that wasn't pure fancruft. Nobody is ever going to come up with an alternate citation that is any more acceptable under Wiki regs unless the connection is specified in on-air 1643:

prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the

1554:

589:

much easier time finding that posted text than a physical copy of the book, and the fact that the site on which it has been posted is a "fan" one is irrelevant to the nature of the material under discussion. Furthermore, the novel

3253: 799:"Lots will happen between Election Day 2008 and Election Day 2012, but if Obama loses Tuesday, his one time rival, Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York, immediately becomes a prohibitive favorite for the 2012 Democratic nomination. 3249: 3085:

All edits were within a 24 hour period. Whether or not you break the "3 revert rule", blocks are still acceptable if a user continues to edit war despite warnings. I invite you all to take part in the discussion on

1705:

No polls were removed yet, if you want to help clean up the primary content which is old and out of place, go ahead. I just moved it down and the general election stuff up. It still needs cleanup or simplification.

5160: 1994: 1254:

take down Ensign because no one is talking him in conjunction 2012, but why are people still talking about Sanford in conjunction 2012? I was wondering if maybe you wanted to add your feedback to this discussion

2291:

Hello Ratemonth. Thanks for your work reverting the unsourced entries by IP 75.224.90.15. We have had an ongoing problem with this sort of thing for some time now so I thought I would make you aware of this list

4888:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 3230:

to the other spot please feel free to do so. If you don't like the source you might mention it on the talk page. I am just trying to avoid any edit warring so please forgive me if this post causes any offense.

1313: 3114: 4685:, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Knowledge (XXG) is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, 3921: 1782:

business scene. If not proved, checked, or valid, there is no need to be published on wikipedia, even if it is published in one (and just one) national magazine. This is explanation for the deletion made.

2581: 2561: 2151: 3917: 1742:

How can you assert that it is "usual" to do something in the absence of either a minority government nor a coalition being formed when a UK election is inconclusive, when the situation has never arisen?

982: 975: 2413:

newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

2268:

newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

2259: 2187:? And I quote - "if the edits were made in good faith, they are not vandalism". What I have added is relevant, appropriate to current events, and properly referenced AND is appropriate for summary. 2160:

newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

3643: 5144:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2404: 4933: 3828:

in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks,

3210:

Thanks for the notice and I just corrected the error; it shouldn't be contradicting right now. If there's any further errors, questions, or misunderstandings; please, let me know at the talk page.

1309: 3639: 1989: 3502: 2576: 2556: 584:, originally published by Virgin Books in 1996, all of which was stated (well, you do have to know or at least be able to figure out what "nzdwfc" stands for, as you obviously did, and that 4389: 3498: 2641:, I noticed you reverted an edit of mine on March 10 2012. I reverted it back. The original intent of my edit was fixing a spelling correction, and was not meant as vandalism. Thank you. 2575:

Nevermind. I found a news article that says the election is in 2018. I just don't think that calling someone a vandal when I had some evidence, even if it outdated is appropriate. --

4278:

Also threatening to edit war with someone "till one of us falls asleep" suggests a battleground approach to editing and you were lucky you didn't find yourself blocked just for that.

3299:

disagreed and felt that top row candidates needed to have full ballot access to be on the top row so I had to explain my editing decision. It sounds like we may agree on this part.

2602:

Please don't revert edits without looking into essense and into the article talk page. The article was stale for two years. Time for it to go. Once againn, "stateless communism" is a

805:"Thin bench," Dan Bartlett, the former longtime adviser to President Bush, said recently when asked to list some potential 2012 GOP contenders if McCain fall short of the presidency. 30: 4534: 2827: 1948:

On the El Paso page, I used temperatures that included earlier dates, they're from a Texas climatology site, but I'll re-add the numbers once I find that website address again.

2618:. Anyway, communism is dead, and this bullshit may sit here for another two years, I dont care. It is just bad impression about wikipedia coming form this page that bothers me. 4319: 1341: 4937: 3696: 1344:

useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the

160: 4576:, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on 520:, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Knowledge (XXG) has readers from all over the world, our policy is to 3692: 5023: 4006:

in the episode, just not in the conventional way: They were seen as images produced by the TARDIS for it's visual interface. Just thought you ought to know. ––

3581: 2068: 2661: 607:

dialogue (also, doesn't the word "spam" refer to content more so than the source?). You should either delete the entire passage or leave the cite up with it. --

2496: 2351: 3909: 1687:

Please stop undoing changes because you don't like them or you don't understand the editor's intent or explanation. Neither are valid grounds for reversion.

4795: 3931: 3706: 3653: 3512: 2506: 2361: 2492: 2347: 5018: 983:

Talk:Chronology of events of the 2009 Honduran political crisis#SqueakBox unilaterally changed the name again, even as we were discussing the name change

976:

Talk:Chronology of events of the 2009 Honduran political crisis#SqueakBox unilaterally changed the name again, even as we were discussing the name change

204: 4932:

this? "White pride is a movement encouraging people to take pride in being white." Or are you saying it's racist and neonazi to be proud to be white?

4604: 3631: 3577: 3087: 4851: 4847: 2117: 4928:

supremacist organizations to signal their racist viewpoints whereas Black pride is a movement encouraging people to take pride in being black.

2964:

Foreign Ministry website PMR added illiterate contraction of the words "street" and "city", ie «Ul» instead of «str», and «g» instead of «town».

2666: 4569: 1605:

for episode titles in Knowledge (XXG). It's hard to correct it, if u change it back. Thanks for understanding. I'm on airport so I only use IP.

1517: 2410: 2388: 2265: 2244: 2157: 2136: 4791: 3927: 3702: 3649: 3508: 3490: 2555:

Can you give proof that the next russian presidential election is in 2018? I gave proof for the 2016 election and you called me a vandal. --

2502: 2357: 1606: 1399: 449: 67:

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the

5174: 4913: 4580:

and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my

4002:

in which you say you're removing vandalism. While I agree that this should've been removed, it is not vandalism. Rose, Martha, and Donna

3257: 2982: 2464: 2443: 2097: 2044: 1713: 1282:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Republican_Party_(United_States)_presidential_primaries,_2012#This_article_is_not_about_who_will_be_running.3F

1023: 774: 473: 200: 383: 1398:; chalk that up to my ignorance. But it stands to reason just because the body is non-partisan doesn't mean its members are, as witness 4973: 4953: 4836: 4822: 3211: 3197: 3182: 3091: 3005: 2923: 2854: 2642: 2121: 1955: 1902: 1883: 1814: 1219: 3459: 3383: 2968: 4237: 4148: 3806: 3782: 3315: 2807:

227 that means there's 27 episodes but specified source says 26 eps, source is wrong. Please don't add again. I hope you understand.

1840: 1636: 1281: 1255: 766: 427: 178: 4642: 554: 326: 4693: 4482: 4359: 2022:

Please do not call my articles rude because I find it very rude, I was just started the article so other people can finish it off.

1649: 1560: 1169:

You wanted a source that proves the season 4 of The Venture Bros. starts on October 18, see the Adult Swim schedule for yourself :

255: 182: 4255: 3033: 2231: 2203: 1068: 868: 841: 64: 903:

All leader deposed by coups de etat are listed as no longer governing. And no of them has been legally removed from office... --

361: 356: 305: 5170: 4909: 4289: 3615: 3025: 695: 660: 34: 5153: 4705: 4650: 4494: 4450: 4371: 4327: 4091: 3924:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3699:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3646:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3505:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2499:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2354:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2090:

Leave to amend the text, the city is not called "Heroica Ciudad Juárez". His name is Ciudad Juárez, Heroica is just a slogan

1657: 1568: 957: 287: 124: 4788:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4766:

wasn't good either: the sorting was messed up for the days column; Grover Cleveland and Lyndon B. Johnson were out of order.

3279: 1533: 4709: 4498: 4375: 4095: 2787:

The specified source says there's 26 episodes but episode "Boot It Up"' prod code is 227 so there's more episodes than 26.

1661: 1572: 941: 936: 441: 292: 216: 3156: 4573: 4415: 3272: 3016: 2614:" did not have communism, although in loose and polemic parlance they theirs was called "communism" . Anyway, I requested 423: 317: 309: 233: 229: 191: 2296:

that we have been keeping to track this pest(s). Thanks again for your vigilance and have a great 2012 on wiki and off.

1893: 744: 4900:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

4688: 4504: 4381: 1667: 1578: 947: 537: 521: 405: 365: 251: 212: 5165: 4905: 2076: 2002: 889: 2830:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. I didn't name you, but your opinion is valid.

378: 374: 238: 195: 3882:

Hi - No comment on the specific debate, but I just wanted to let you know that biased sources are not prohibited in

2293: 1867:

prime sources of information about new developments and air dates/-times! Satoriforsale 20:34, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

1497:

Have you read the book that says they are not characters from the book or that locations in the book are not there?

4780:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3966: 3908:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3683:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3630:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3489:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2971:

new president Shevchuk signed a decree number 252, which recognized only the official name of the PMR in English -

1513: 2048:

article quickly and add it instead of deleting a real candidate. A simple search usually gives a reliable source.

334: 220: 187: 3684: 3471: 1610: 595: 497: 4701: 4682: 4662: 4638: 4538: 4490: 4462: 4438: 4367: 4339: 4315: 4087: 3736:

Please don't delete anyone's comments but your own, and even then only if no one has responded to your comment.

1645: 1640: 1631: 1556: 1551: 1546: 952:. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a 733: 650: 330: 321: 118: 114: 4514: 3261: 3141: 2986: 2468: 2447: 1804:

Please can you revert that article back to a more distant sane copy without all the crap, I don't know how to.

1717: 477: 5141: 3155:

Why did you undo my edit on the Rory Williams -page? The Let's Kill Hitler page says the year is 1938 as does

2101: 1993:

as a result of your outstanding contributions to U.S. presidential election articles. Please add your name to

436: 432: 387: 2536:

Thanks for dealing with his/her gibberish. I have been trying to since November. Any help is appreciated.

1959: 1906: 1818: 1417:

got my suspicions up. That's why I attempted the revision -- and I do believe some form of it should stand.

528:

appropriate variety of English used there. If it is an international topic, use the same form of English the

4977: 4957: 4159:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

3868: 3443:

on Seattle-related Knowledge (XXG) articles with Knowledge (XXG) tutorials and Librarian assistance on hand.

3215: 3201: 3186: 2858: 2724: 2673: 2646: 2125: 1879: 1348:. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. 1223: 4969: 3778: 3303: 2460: 2439: 2219: 2191: 2093: 1951: 1898: 1871: 1836: 1810: 1709: 1509: 1505: 1215: 1094: 1056: 856: 829: 259: 225: 58: 5205: 5094: 5053: 5010: 3833: 3810: 3786: 3311: 2422: 2072: 1998: 1844: 1787: 1355: 1155: 885: 782: 517: 493: 4901: 4697: 4654: 4646: 4486: 4454: 4446: 4363: 4331: 4323: 4079: 2184: 1653: 1564: 1458:) 18:56, 3 July 2010 (UTC) Talk to me or don't bother your choice, ive explain now your terms to expalin 953: 685: 541: 413: 409: 300: 283: 246: 155: 4293: 3962: 2930:. PS: Your refusal to respond to me 'here', only add to the appearance of you making this all personal. 2623: 2029: 1178: 1016: 550: 2484: 2339: 1783: 1151: 1049:

this to anyone else I may have left and please read the thread on Ruled Out and give us your feedback.

928: 296: 110: 4533:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at

2978: 2025: 1400:

the news Mr. O'Rourke would not run for Congress against the powerful Silvestre Reyes -- as a Democrat

681: 638: 599:

with the formation of UNIT. The idea may have been in the minds of the creative team at the time, but

4577: 4249: 4222: 3848: 3467: 2227: 2223: 2199: 2195: 1294: 1263: 1197: 1193: 1088: 1064: 864: 837: 612: 5128: 5110: 4877: 4868: 4842: 4716: 4048: 3001: 1740:

How can you be certain that no candidate will die between nominations closing and the election date?

1345: 1273:

Debate over whether or not Bobby Jindal and Mark Sanford should be removed the 2012 Rep Primary Page

1111: 725: 642: 641:

has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the

419: 352: 4966:

I'm not sure, but the consensus on the Democratic primary articles count for the Republicans too.

4616: 4510: 4442: 4285: 4021: 3741: 3610: 3589: 3562: 3547: 3370: 3235: 3164: 3137: 3122: 2826:

Hello, Ratemonth. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at

2769: 2696: 2596: 2541: 2301: 1833:

Stop putting this back in, it's vandalism. The 60 years obviously refers to previous generations.

1766: 1751: 1321: 1030: 996: 692: 657: 80: 42: 5137: 4897: 4881: 4063: 3136:

I know. I was say "Showfax.com is not a reliable source information may wrong.." I wasn't add it.

2757: 2740: 2395: 2250: 2142: 128: 4589: 4581: 4200:

http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2013/07/lee-wrights-considering-run-for-texas-governor/

3864: 3296: 2669: 1875: 1677: 1418: 1411: 1340:

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find

1009: 580: 4657:

rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

4457:

rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

4334:

rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

4054: 3009: 2908:

You do realize you've breached 3RR (over 3 rvts within 24hrs). Now, you're just being spiteful.

2615: 1738:

Why is it relevant to post details of party leaders who may not be in place in 4 1/2 years time?

445: 5078: 5049: 4998: 4859: 4811: 4565: 4411: 4297: 4273: 4262:, but I wanted to make sure I left some notice here to go with the 3RR warning I gave there. — 4119: 4103: 3981: 3947: 3829: 3722: 3669: 3635: 3528: 3307: 3099: 3008:

article. I am giving you all your only and/or final warning to stop edit warring, or you may

2935: 2913: 2899: 2881: 2522: 2418: 2377: 2277: 2169: 1693: 1379: 1350: 908: 796:

That article does say he will run and I have included the quoted text from the article below.

778: 729: 728:

for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative

646: 645:

for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative

540:. If you have any queries about all this, you can ask me on my talk page or you can visit the 68: 5149: 4893: 4885: 4394: 4259: 4075: 3887: 3825: 3113:

As a frequent or occasional editor of U.S. election-related articles, your participation in

2688: 1926: 1734:

How can you be certain that the forthcoming referendum will not result in a change in system?

370: 242: 150: 4725: 4269: 3895: 3344: 2948:

is named with politicians from Moldova and Romania disrespectfully with a Holocaust name as

2812: 2792: 2619: 2611: 1480: 1463: 1455: 1422: 1174: 986: 965: 742: 545: 5152:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 5145: 5005:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

4896:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4889: 4241: 4083: 4059: 3883: 2927: 1529: 146: 4546: 4245: 4218: 4140: 3688: 2843: 2324: 2053: 1475:=Thank you for listening, dialouge would be better though so I know what your thinking :) 1290: 1259: 1256:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Republican_Party_(United_States)_presidential_primaries,_2012

1084: 1060: 860: 833: 608: 50: 1761:"It has been allowed in the past" means nothing: answer the questions I have put to you. 819:

Also, according to this article Lindsay Graham and Rob Portman should be added as well.

5041: 4767: 4754: 4746: 4612: 4280: 4044: 4007: 3737: 3605: 3585: 3558: 3543: 3403: 3361: 3231: 3160: 3118: 2765: 2665:

followed throughout the primary article serie. There is a discussion on the subject at

2537: 2297: 1934: 1762: 1747: 1317: 1235: 1134: 1119: 689: 654: 75: 3359:

Oops, didn't catch that it was a quote, sorry about that, and thanks for catching it.

1625: 1540: 923: 4802: