User talk:Yozer1 - Knowledge (XXG)

2135:"from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped. 1961:"from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped. 1654:"from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped. 703:. On wikipedia, we're picky about living people, anything that's said about them has to have a reliable source behind it. Your post has what looks to be an opinion piece from a Turkish newspaper. Admittedly, I can't tell if the newspaper is reliable, the piece itself appears to not be reliable. Instead of reverting, may I suggest you place a note on our reliable sources board and ask if this is indeed a reliable source. If you keep reverting , you could be blocked for it. 930: 2790: 1855: 900: 17: 1479: 187: 3490: 2155: 1782: 1008: 561: 2335: 992:, and on the two talk pages I mentioned you made no constructive contribution, just reverting edits of other users. This is not an acceptable dispute resolution avenue. Please resort to constructive editing when the block expires. Note that I treat the block as usual and I did not check whether you have any Arbcom restrictions. If you do, the block can be modified by any administrator.-- 3706: 297: 131: 3284: 2092: 1610: 3347:: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped." 371: 338: 3393:. He did not remove the ‘Armenian tendencies’ comment. At that point I decided that Yozer1 was not going to change his position and issued the block, which occurred at 02:00 on April 5. On his own initiative, Kansas Bear had removed Yozer1's ‘Armenian tendencies’ comment from his own talk page at 00:42 on 5 April. 742:

Thank you for your notification KoshVorlon. It seems that you will accept my contributions to Hasan Cemal if I find a "reliable" source. Sure, I can do that. In fact, I can find numerous sources to justify my case. But there is no need, it is not that important. The source that I had on is admittedly

472:

It's not for us to decide how to interpret history. Recent edits made by you to Hezârfen Ahmed Çelebi and Lycia seem aimed not to more accurately reflect sources, but to favour an interpretation. To be frank, several edits seem motivated by "feelings", personal disposition to the subject; this is

1539:

if you wish to submit an appeal to the enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has

1344:

That settles the issue nicely: the edit was most definitely propaganda. Knowledge (XXG) is not a venue for promoting a political agenda, a particular view, or favoured interpretation- nor is a forum rant a credible source. YOU should have disdained such a label because YOU assessed that it would

3360:. Mere insults will probably roll off his back, but your behavior suggests you have no intention of following the rules in this part of the encyclopedia. The only option for us is to repeat your last one-year block. Topic bans have value only for those who understand and are willing to follow them. 752:

Yozer1 - thanks for your response, actually, I was able to read the Turkish source you presented with Chrome (I have a translator plugin for it ). It looks like an opinion piece, and yes, it does talk about Hasan Cemal, but it never uses the word "unappologetic". If you want that term to be in

757:

and you'll see what I mean. As far as taking your word for it, actually, even if it's in another language, we have speakers of other languages that could verify what the source says. We almost never take anyone's word for it, we require a source that says what the entry is saying (the only

3757:

and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the

3261:

Hey, hey, you guys are a mafia! How about you warn Kansas Bear for breaking Knowledge (XXG) rules and deleting added info without asking for citations. I can provide you all the citations you need. But I sense there is another agenda here. Anyway, Knowledge (XXG) is never going to be a credible

1246:

Your interpretation of the Turkish "fetih" as "liberation" instead of the ubiquitous "conquest" is bizarre; the Turks universally proffer "conquest". What is your explanation for this? It seems that either your apprehension of English or Turkish is in error, or you are advocating an atypical

1791:. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved. 3246:, there is no excuse for you to comment on any Armenian matters, or to accuse others of editing with 'Armenian tendencies'. Please remember that your last block was for one year. Don't tempt fate by showing us that you are still continuing with your former ways. Thank you, 3262:

source of information with users who do not play by the rules and administrators who don't act impartially. And to threaten another user with another ban! Where are other administrators? Are they on break? Do I have to complain to get attention? What a waste of time... -

2474:, as does the other website if only because MalwareBytes blocked it. I presume it's also another personal website, but I couldn't check it. In any case, it can't be used if it's going to cause people concern - if it's accurate there will be other more reliable sources. 3073:

Let's see. You changed the archiving, something you definitely shouldn't touch. You added a closed report on Lecen from 2013. And your own ban report from the same year. Neither of which belonged there. So I can't see how it was anything but disruptive.

156:

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on

149:. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our 843:

You've been warned for edit-warring: if you revert again you can expect to be blocked. Additionally, if you remove other editors' comments again, you may be blocked for disruptive editing. Please use the article talkpage to arrive at a consensus.

1201:

I strongly recommend you follow Helen's advice. It's clear that you don't understand how to constructively interact with other editors and your subterfuge saying that your edit warring opponents did not discuss things on the talk page is pure

618:

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to

363:

3738:, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 2026:

That would be agianst policy, and the new account would be blocked as well (it's quite easy to detect such things). You can appeal the block if you think you shouldn't have been blocked or if you think the duration is unfair. Either place

656:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in

408:

3762:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request 3440:, as he claims to be an adult (since he blames me for making childish comments - which I do not agree with) and can handle his own issues. Wait, he did not handle the issue and complained directly to you. Correct? 3429:

You should give ample time to users to respond to your requests. People are not stuck on Knowledge (XXG) 24 hours a day. Normal people have jobs and responsibilities and log in to Knowledge (XXG) on a regular

2257:, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the 3443:

You can be a little more patient and control your anger if you want to be a judge on Knowledge (XXG). Thank God you are not a judge in real life. Otherwise, you would be oppressing many innocent people.

2107:. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the 3743: 210:- no sources, and Google search turns up nothing in English. I cannot read sources in Arabic or Turkish (sorry, I'm English) so if these exist, please add them to the article to prevent deletion. 1532: 1486: 3814:

Thank you for your kind action. Please accept my apologies as I was having a bad day and one thing lead to another. Let me know if I can be of any assistance in the future. Best regards, -

2259: 31: 21: 2292:, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. 1345:

advocate a highly marginal partisan point of view. Unless you are able to report judiciously and faithfully adhere to the tenants of Knowledge (XXG), desisting would be wise.

904: 762:

as they deal with non-public information. I invite you to ask around about this, since I'm not a sysop, nor an admin, nor anything other than an editor, just as you are.

2166:

Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been

3838: 573:. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license. 309:. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license. 1732: 585: 505: 321: 3303:. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. 746:

As for reverting, may I remind you that my contribution were deleted. I would have thought the person who removed them would be warned of vandalism. Thank you.

500:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

3786: 3344: 3042: 2247: 2132: 1958: 1651: 1411: 646: 398: 1728: 3650:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

1169:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

3204: 3129: 2950: 2905: 2826: 2682: 2598: 2553: 2508: 2440: 1742: 1985:); after that, it becomes a normal admin action, and the above "reminder to administrators" ceases to apply. Until then, the block can only be appealed to 1367:. Your reference does not mention any trees being cut. In addition, the Italian construction company says the plans never changed during construction. Are 2742:

Please fix broken links rather than just flagging them. It took less than 30 seconds via Archive.org to find the webpage you flagged as a broken link at

2632:. Some of the items seem most relevant to Turkish history in general (rather than to the city of Istanbul), and therefore might be placed instead in the 79: 3088:

Sorry, I did not read the section in the user manual on what can be touched and what cannot, or where things belong and where they do not. Anyway... -

3739: 3735: 3695: 666: 418: 266: 3670: 3662:

Hello Yozer1. Per your comments above, you desire to appeal the one-year block which I imposed to enforce your existing indefinite topic ban from

3328: 2295:

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

1536: 444: 2346: 2328: 2289: 2277: 2176: 2146: 576:

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

1798: 1677:

Your next block may very well have indefinite duration, so I strongly advise you to take the ArbCom enforcement and your topic ban seriously.--

3635: 3310: 3306: 2108: 1626: 1154: 966: 674: 422: 3200: 3125: 2946: 2901: 2822: 2678: 2594: 2549: 2504: 2436: 1738: 3402:

about the quality of citations. This reinforces my impression that he doesn't recognize the ban and is simply continuing his old ways, that

2352:

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply

2651:

Hello! You are absolutely correct. Except for the Marmaray project which belongs to Istanbul, the rest can go. Thank you for the notice. -

1502: 1327: 3789:. If you want to make any further statements, add them below and I or some other admin will move them across to the noticeboard. Use the 3530: 1048: 600:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter 345:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter 3356:. You declined to remove the statement in which you accused Kansas Bear of having "Armenian tendencies". You made a new edit where you 3118:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

2815:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

2671:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

3676:

template below. Please fill in the fields with the details of your appeal, and I (or another admin) will then copy it over for you to

3398:

The responses by Yozer1 seem to assume he is still a regular editor in the ARBAA2 space and is entitled to banter back and forth with

2142: 1769: 1513: 497: 270: 3754: 3731: 3699: 3152: 2803: 2758: 1872: 1520:. This sanction has been recorded on the log of sanctions for that decision. If the sanction includes a topic ban, please read the 1276:

What opposing view? Please cite one instance of "Mehmet the Liberator" - as I can find NOTHING. Who are these people that call

1695:. You would be doing me a favor. I would have more time for other activities in life. The loosers would be Knowledge (XXG) users. 1127:

your edits from being discussed on the talkpage and edit-warred there and at Sandstein's talkpage to hide other users' comments.

443:

I see you're having a bit of difficulty getting anything done here at Knowledge (XXG). Can I suggest that you might want to read

650: 642: 402: 394: 56: 1294:

Ayrı şeylerden bahsediyoruz. "Fall of Constantinople" yerine bir "Conquest of Constantinople" dene, gör kaç kişi karşı çıkıyor.

3848:

Knowledge (XXG) editing requires even greater motivation. The people who gain most are almost always the charlatans and liars.

3715: 3446:

Your block is unnecessary since I did not repeat "banter" with Kansas Bear, who by the way deserves an admonishment as well. -

2370:

code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

2269:, a friendly space on Knowledge (XXG) where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 1735:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 942: 51: 3352:

Per my comments above, you were given a chance to fix the situation by reverting your statements that violated your ban from

3197:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3122:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2943:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2898:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2819:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2675:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2591:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2546:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2501:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2433:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 950: 541:

Sorry, I got it confused with the final 1101 taking over of the city by the Danishmend Turks. Thank you for enlightening me.

258: 198: 176: 3599:

with a warning to be unbiased but he arrogantly insulted and blocked for a year. Appealing for a decent review of the case.

3433:

I though my ban on topic ARBAA2 was also one year long. I made this clear in my comments which I did not get a response to.

312:

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

305: 1441:

there, simply at the end of the following sentence. I have restored the information, including a quote from the source. --

1437:

If I were you, I would avoid removing any information that could be construed as disruptive editing. Since the references

743:

from the pen of another writer. I am fluent in a couple of languages, you will have to take my word for the translation.

388: 3759: 3466:

either. Shows how well you follow, or do not follow, my edits. Again, you know what you are doing. You are just biased. -

670: 628: 569: 382: 262: 3525: 3332: 1043: 239: 3503: 3295: 2099: 1617: 1525: 1322:

Wake up and do some research. It is a liberation from the tyranny of the Byzantines from a Muslim point of view. E.g.:

1021: 937: 61: 2985:

an AE decision you are banned from the topic areas covered by WP:ARBAA2 on all pages of Knowledge (XXG) including Talk

2633: 1528:

for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

824:

I reverted you because you wrote "Conquest of Istanbul" which is a nonsense and as link points to nothing (red link).

282: 3722: 3497: 3119: 2816: 2672: 1521: 1509: 1015: 527:

I would be interested in seeing your sources that state Malatya/Melitene was taken by the Danishmend Turks in 934. --

3021: 2377:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:

3502:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

3189:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2988: 2977: 2935:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2890:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2583:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2538:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2493:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2425:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1719:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1020:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

635: 86:

using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our

1364: 1622: 1456:

Thank you for adding the rest of the sentence. Now, what would you do if I were to bring you contrary evidence?

946: 46: 41: 456: 166: 3290: 2494: 2086: 1596: 501: 493: 75: 1540:

been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.

2012:

Is it time to sign-up for a new account? Why bother? Not many people take Knowledge (XXG) seriously anyway.

194: 180: 2306: 1981:

To clarify, this block can only stand as an arbitration enforcement action for one year (until 29 December

150: 1720: 829: 278: 2371: 2305:

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

1773: 274: 83: 3771: 2755: 2049: 1998: 1905: 1446: 1191: 913: 608: 532: 353: 2265: 1328:

http://www.muslimmotherhoodsg.com/sultan-muhd-alfateh-result-of-islamic-religious-education-from-young/

581: 317: 1898: 870:

again. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt this time because my warning may not have come in time.

3804: 3685: 3544: 3411: 3365: 3251: 3190: 3079: 3050: 3032: 2996: 2690: 2629: 2479: 2317: 1565: 1545: 1330:. But as you can see, I have not pursued pushing that label since it might not be considered neutral. 1277: 1262:

Trying to debate with and satisfy the opposing point of view is not easy. Thank you for your support.

1136: 1062: 879: 853: 682: 601: 346: 67: 2853: 2796: 2789: 1682: 1425: 1350: 1313: 1285: 1252: 997: 981: 478: 448: 250: 227: 162: 138: 3663: 3353: 3243: 2299: 1943: 1600: 1494: 3856: 3815: 3793: 3600: 3508: 3467: 3447: 3263: 3089: 3060: 3007: 2774: 2652: 2406: 2060: 2013: 1916: 1696: 1664: 1576: 1457: 1380: 1331: 1295: 1263: 1223: 1102: 1026: 542: 142: 124: 3787:

Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Arbitration enforcement action appeal by Yozer1

3758:

speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

3220: 3175: 2966: 2921: 2876: 2728: 2705: 2614: 2569: 2524: 2456: 2263:. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the 2229: 2117: 1970: 1883: 1861: 1854: 1836: 1758: 1524:

to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be

1212: 825: 235: 3763: 759: 3767: 3644: 3588: 3437: 3399: 3317: 3239: 3059:

I was wondering about that. How was my edit there 'disruptive'? Please explain your logic. -

2936: 2749: 2395: 2041: 2031: 1990: 1901: 1442: 1376: 1186: 1163: 956: 908: 528: 115: 93: 3327:. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the 2342: 2218: 2161: 1823: 1788: 1206:. If this continues after your block expires, your next block will likely be indefinite. 1181:

to see how it's done. Yozer1 made no attempt to discuss it on the talk page and repeatedly

1178: 989: 754: 216: 3800: 3681: 3596: 3407: 3361: 3247: 3075: 3046: 3028: 3024: 2992: 2641: 2475: 2313: 2285: 1561: 1541: 1130: 929: 873: 847: 764: 705: 678: 158: 100: 37:

I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

3677: 3580: 3576: 2471: 1986: 1485:

The following sanction now applies to you (in accordance with the procedure described at

1203: 663:

Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

415:

Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

3331:

on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (

2426: 2353: 1692: 1678: 1660: 1632: 1415: 1360: 1346: 1309: 1281: 1248: 993: 474: 215:

While all contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be

107: 16: 3734:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

2387:, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission. 207: 3622: 3211: