324:, I don't see it as being any different, and if people agree with the deletion of this list perhaps those would be next. Then followed by notable people from cities and notable college alumni lists. I guess I just don't understand the benefit of having both massive, unwieldy lists, as well categories. These lists are not user friendly; do people really look for one specific article from a list of hundreds of chefs from the 21st century? Categories are more specific, better organized, and more inclusive (categories are almost always quickly and correctly assigned, I'm sure fewer editors add new articles to lists such as this). I bet this topic has been discussed before, but I'm just curious what the general sentiment is now. This has been on my mind working with
436:
as standard index of people by occupation per LISTPURP and NOTDUP. The nom’s expressed antipathy towards all such lists generally is not a valid deletion argument, and makes it clear that there is no rationale specific to this list.
217:
85:
413:
375:
178:
211:
394:
249:
80:
356:
125:
110:
248:
Unlimited and unmaintainable list of all chefs on
Knowledge. Organization of a topic of this caliber should be left to categories, not infinite lists.
296:
151:
146:
155:
450:
425:
405:
386:
367:
345:
312:
287:
261:
65:
325:
105:
98:
17:
138:
232:
199:
329:
300:
119:
115:
53:
295:. I'd like to dispose of it (being a card-carrying deletionist) ... but how is it any different from all the other
467:
40:
193:
308:
189:
463:
36:
239:
225:
275:
142:
445:
421:
398:
379:
360:
319:
304:
94:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
462:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
341:
283:
257:
61:
205:
134:
71:
439:
417:
271:
172:
337:
279:
253:
57:
333:
332:, even if categories make it redundant? Is this really a good way to
328:
recently. Is it worth creating more of these massive lists, such as
458:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
168:
164:
160:
224:
278:. That answers all the questions that I had. Cheers,
414:
list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions
86:
Articles for deletion/List of chefs (2nd nomination)
376:
list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
470:). No further edits should be made to this page.
412:Note: This discussion has been included in the
393:Note: This discussion has been included in the
374:Note: This discussion has been included in the
355:Note: This discussion has been included in the
238:
8:
126:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
395:list of France-related deletion discussions
411:
392:
373:
357:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
354:
78:
297:Category:lists of people by occupation
7:
81:Articles for deletion/List of chefs
24:
330:List of Italian football players
111:Introduction to deletion process
326:Knowledge:WikiProject Orphanage
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
451:16:45, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
426:07:19, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
406:06:10, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
387:06:09, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
368:06:09, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
346:16:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
313:06:03, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
288:17:33, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
262:04:29, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
66:17:36, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
301:List of computer scientists
101:(AfD)? Read these primers!
487:
52:. Nomination withdrawn. (
460:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
77:AfDs for this article:
268:Withdrawn by nominator
99:Articles for deletion
274:for pointing me to
428:
408:
389:
370:
116:Guide to deletion
106:How to contribute
54:non-admin closure
478:
403:
384:
365:
323:
250:The original AFD
243:
242:
228:
176:
158:
96:
34:
486:
485:
481:
480:
479:
477:
476:
475:
474:
468:deletion review
399:
380:
361:
317:
185:
149:
133:
130:
93:
90:
75:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
484:
482:
473:
472:
454:
453:
430:
429:
409:
390:
371:
351:
350:
349:
348:
290:
246:
245:
182:
129:
128:
123:
113:
108:
91:
89:
88:
83:
76:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
483:
471:
469:
465:
461:
456:
455:
452:
448:
447:
442:
441:
435:
432:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
410:
407:
404:
402:
396:
391:
388:
385:
383:
377:
372:
369:
366:
364:
358:
353:
352:
347:
343:
339:
335:
334:build the web
331:
327:
321:
316:
315:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
291:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
266:
265:
264:
263:
259:
255:
251:
241:
237:
234:
231:
227:
223:
219:
216:
213:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
191:
188:
187:Find sources:
183:
180:
174:
170:
166:
162:
157:
153:
148:
144:
140:
136:
135:List of chefs
132:
131:
127:
124:
121:
117:
114:
112:
109:
107:
104:
103:
102:
100:
95:
87:
84:
82:
79:
73:
72:List of chefs
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
459:
457:
444:
438:
433:
401:CAPTAIN RAJU
400:
382:CAPTAIN RAJU
381:
363:CAPTAIN RAJU
362:
320:Clarityfiend
305:Clarityfiend
292:
270:- thanks to
267:
252:was delete.
247:
235:
229:
221:
214:
208:
202:
196:
186:
92:
49:
47:
31:
28:
276:WP:LISTPURP
212:free images
50:speedy keep
464:talk page
418:• Gene93k
37:talk page
466:or in a
179:View log
120:glossary
39:or in a
440:postdlf
299:, e.g.
293:Comment
272:postdlf
218:WP refs
206:scholar
152:protect
147:history
97:New to
338:Mbdfar
280:Mbdfar
254:Mbdfar
190:Google
156:delete
58:Mbdfar
233:JSTOR
194:books
173:views
165:watch
161:links
16:<
446:talk
434:Keep
422:talk
342:talk
309:talk
284:talk
258:talk
226:FENS
200:news
169:logs
143:talk
139:edit
62:talk
240:TWL
177:– (
449:)
424:)
416:.
397:.
378:.
359:.
344:)
336:?
311:)
303:?
286:)
260:)
220:)
171:|
167:|
163:|
159:|
154:|
150:|
145:|
141:|
64:)
56:)
443:(
420:(
340:(
322::
318:@
307:(
282:(
256:(
244:)
236:·
230:·
222:·
215:·
209:·
203:·
197:·
192:(
184:(
181:)
175:)
137:(
122:)
118:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.