Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 November 29

< Knowledge:Articles for deletion‎ | Log

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday September 26 (Thu) September 25 (Wed) September 24 (Tue) More...

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern.Not-Sorted

< November 28	November 30 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 18:52, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Ghana Music Awards UK

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

the topic of this award has no evidence of Notability , most of the sources provided are Not relieble sources, it fails Knowledge Notability Samat lib (talk) 11:45, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Samat lib (talk) 11:59, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Samat lib (talk) 11:59, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 12:28, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

@Samat lib - Doing some reserach, I found this, this and this. I take it none of these are particularly great source choices, right? Foxnpichu (talk) 16:45, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Comment. the few sources provided on the article are press released, advertisment , none of them are relieble sources that are independent of the subject, with significant discussion of the subject @Foxnpichu again the topic of this article fail to meet Knowledge Notability , Samat lib (talk) 21:36, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Comment. Knowledge is NOT the right place for promotions or advert Samat lib (talk) 21:36, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

In that case, I'm going to say Delete. Foxnpichu (talk) 23:10, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:22, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Delete Doesn't seem to be enough reliable coverage to support notability.Star7924 (talk) 16:15, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Missvain (talk) 02:57, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Bees Bagla

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page consists completely of original research (including lots of unencyclopedic information) and has been this way since at least 2011. Searching for this place online, it seems likely that it exists (there's a Facebook page about it, and it's included on weather sites) but there is not a single reliable source about it. Even if I'm wrong about the latter and this place is notable, judging by the condition of the article and the lack of improvement over the past decade, WP:TNT seems applicable. (To avoid confusion: the place is in Pakistan, not in India as the article currently states, this seems to have been changed at some point.)Lennart97 (talk) 23:15, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Comment @Goldsztajn: did a fantastic job at cleaning the article up (thank you very much!), so I think this discussion can be safely closed as Keep. Lennart97 (talk) 11:54, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 23:18, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 23:27, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 23:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Keep Facebook and weather sites auto-generate pages from various databases and are not useful for verifiability. Per USAID, this is a genuine village in Pakistan and likely notable. OR in the article may be freely removed. Reywas92 02:57, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Keep per the USAID source. Seems this is definitely a village, appears to pass GEOLAND. Hog Farm _Bacon 04:42, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Keep - passes WP:GEOLAND as per the two editors above; the OR should be removed after this AfD concludes but let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater Spiderone 08:58, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Keep made a clean up and added sourcing. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 11:50, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Keep passes WP:GEOLAND.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:22, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Keep yes better after clean up. Deathlibrarian (talk) 00:06, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 18:54, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Talmadge Ragan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A working actress/voice actress, but not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and not enough significant roles to pass WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 22:43, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 22:43, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 22:49, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 22:50, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 22:50, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 22:51, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 22:51, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 22:51, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Keep she is a known actress and she has got awards too.(BeauSuzanne (talk) 08:10, 30 November 2020 (UTC))

Delete nothing here is substantial. Just because you are an actress who gets bit parts does not make you notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:20, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete seems to be minor actress, and featured in lesser known movies, not enough to meet WP:GNG Deathlibrarian (talk) 00:10, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Keep she has done a lot of voice over roles and still does.(192.140.150.177 (talk) 08:44, 4 December 2020 (UTC))
Keep She have and still does narrating quite a number of audiobooks and voiced commercials.(59.103.96.210 (talk) 15:27, 6 December 2020 (UTC))
Delete. She seems to be a working actress, but not a notable one. -- Ssilvers (talk) 07:01, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 22:27, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Ciaran Dickson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NFOOTY and violates WP:CWW Microwave Anarchist (talk) 22:25, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 22:25, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 22:25, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:30, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 22:33, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Delete - fails NFOOTBALL, as has not played in a competitive match between two teams both from WP:FPLs. No evidence of notability via GNG. Giant Snowman 11:58, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete - fails NFOOTY and coverage insufficient for GNG Spiderone 12:47, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete a non-notable footballer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:24, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 18:54, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Neeraj Udhwani

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

article inserted by a account used for promotion (see its activity and blocklog at other wikis; also their deleted enwiki contributions), which makes me think "this article should be probably deleted as well, or at least assessed by the community" Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:08, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:08, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:13, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 22:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Keep I have tried to promote several items in wikimedia projects dosen't mean my creation for any independent and notable identity is promotional as well. Martin Urbanec your suspection can't stop a notable person to be included in Knowledge, please research about the person first to check whether he stands notable or not instead of putting them here in deletion nomination. Adnanjavidkhan1 (talk) 12:29, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete - seems to be mainly a screenwriter, who has directed one film. May be in the future as his career develops, but I think otherwise, does not meet WP:GNG. Deathlibrarian (talk) 00:12, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Delete - Article was created directly into the mainspace, without going through the WP:AFC process first and has been edited by sockpuppets of its creator, Adnanjavidkhan1. --CrystallineLeMonde (talk • contribs) 07:47, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
~~Keep~~ Neeraj Udhwani is an Bollywood known screenwriter and meets all the guidelines to fullfil for the notability, he is not a small kind of screenwriter, even smallest screenwriters are having Knowledge pages without any good notability, please why don't you focus on those first?, Plus this page has already been reviewed! Adnanjavidkhan1 (talk) 08:25, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
@Adnanjavidkhan1: You may not !vote twice.--Jasper Deng (talk) 08:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Delete- The subject in question fails GNG. That, along with the fact that the creator is under investigation for sockpuppetry means this article has no right to remain in Wiki, imv. Sunshine1191 (talk) 00:50, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Comment See also this deletion nomination, page created by the same sock category.--CrystallineLeMonde (talk) 11:07, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Delete - Udhwani does not currently pass WP:GNG Spiderone 17:33, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

The result was delete. Consensus is to delete. There's a lot of words in the couple of keep votes but nothing that actually notes specific sources which discuss the subject in depth. Editors are reminded that AfD is for discussion of specific articles and whether or not there are sources supporting specific notability guidelines, a number of comments here on both sides seem to stray some distance from that. Fenix down (talk) 22:27, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Charity John

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. The article claims that John is an international footballer but this is not supported by any reliable sources; she was called up to the squad but never played. Caps for Nigeria are documented by numerous sources so, if John has been capped, we should be able to find evidence. For example, if we take Ngozi Ebere, we can see evidence of her caps from multiple reliable sources such as Extra Time, GSA and Soccerway. Spiderone 22:04, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:04, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:04, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:04, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:04, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 22:12, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 22:25, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete a complete failure of both GNG and football notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:20, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Keep per WP:GNG I've added a few references to get started with based off of a US-based Google search. Eurosport credits her with national team experience in 2015 as well as u-20 experience in 2008. Article could use expansion and improved referencing per WP:ATD, not deletion. #BlackLivesMatter Hmlarson (talk) 03:38, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

There's no clear evidence that she has played for the national team from her Eurosport profile. She may well have been called up to the squad but she needs to have actually played at least part of a match to qualify for WP:NFOOTY. The sourcing is still just short of GNG, in my view. There are two sources that give her slightly more than a passing mention. What has BLM got to do with this? This is a legitimate AfD on a subject that does not meet our agreed inclusion criteria. Skin colour has nothing to do with this. Spiderone 10:14, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Go to https://www.eurosport.com/football/charity-john_prs445846/person.shtml click on Club Info / Prize List. Hmlarson (talk)

That does not prove that she has actually played a game for Nigeria, though Spiderone 07:54, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Delete She fails GNG and NFOOTBALL (it's difficult finding out whether she has played for a senior international team). A false allegation of this being a racially motivated AfD is appalling. Dougal18 (talk) 12:42, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Comment - for what it's worth, I'm mixed race anyway so the thinly veiled accusation of racism is a laughable one. Spiderone 13:51, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Am I understanding correctly that you perceive #BLACKLIVESMATTER to be an accusation of racism? Hmlarson (talk) 20:56, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Comment: Sometimes I wonder if Knowledge is even serious about closing gender gap, when they are mirroring the bias of the media in the interpretation of their guidelines. I am glad things are changing in the Nigerian media space, but some Wikipedians don't even care when they percieve there is a chance that the footballer might not have played for her country. I remember how the record goalscorer in the NWFL (Amarachi Orjinma) was also deleted, despite having some okay sources. Same also happened to some other women footballers I created that have won major individual awards in the league at the highest level.

I do not agree that the all-inclusive nature of WP:FOOTBALL applies to women's football, as virtually all women's league are not deemed "professional" by Knowledge standards. What I interpret this to mean is that if you're a women footballer, and it is not clear that you've played for your country at the highest level, there is absolutely no chance of you having an article, especially when you are African (since we are at an evolving stage of sources properly covering women football). Nowadays, and based on recent AFDs, I will also say that even if you've played for your country, you could still be deleted if you fail GNG.

There is something wrong with this line of thoughts! HandsomeBoy (talk) 21:08, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Yes, you're right Handsome Boy and it's why one of the original co-founders has moved on to creating Everipedia. Here's Orijinma's article which is now a top 5 result in the United States when searching her name: . There will likely be other platforms as this one has allowed the bs for far too long. Hmlarson (talk) 21:22, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

As with other businesses with a monopolistic advantage, Knowledge needs a viable competitor to get things right. HandsomeBoy (talk) 22:34, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Caps for Nigeria are well documented as I have proved with links to several websites that document them in my original nomination comment. If John was ever capped, I would expect at least one source to clearly show that information, including date of cap, opponent, whether she was a substitute etc. If you believe that Charity John is notable enough then please prove that she satisfies WP:BASIC and give us evidence that she meets Knowledge's wider criteria on biography notability as with any other article on a person, male or female, regardless of ethnic background. Spiderone 07:58, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

To be honest, my comment is not really about this AFD specifically, but I saw this AFD as an opportunity to vent my displeasure on what has been on my mind for a while now concerning the "discriminate notability bar" for women footballers. Let's also remember that unlike male footballer's, women footbalers tend to have a longer active national team career. I follow the Nigerian national teams passionately, and I can say that in the last 10 years, there have been very few additions to the squad. This is unlike our male team that caps players very frequently, limiting the creation of women players to only those that can be proved to have played for the national team at the highest level is implying that you really do not want many women footballers on Knowledge. HandsomeBoy (talk) 12:01, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Spiderone You have proven nothing. Most editors who work in this area know that. Curious why it's so important for you to delete this article in particular when she clearly has references and national team experience. You're putting in a lot of effort for what? Clearly not to expand the article and add references per WP:ATD. Hmlarson (talk) 18:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

I would happily expand the article if sources existed with which I could do so. Many footballers fail WP:NFOOTY but pass WP:GNG such as Sammie Wood, Sara Mérida and Angela Fimmano. Charity John does not appear to be in that group. Spiderone 18:20, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Delete - fails GNG and specific football notability Deathlibrarian (talk) 00:17, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Delete per WP:NFOOTBALL failure. Number 5 7 12:49, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Keep I agree with others who have noted the obvious deficiencies with N:FOOTBALL rules for cases like this. WP:Football frequently gives off strong Manosphere vibes, as it is notoriously sexist. But it is discriminatory in all sorts of other ways too... and yes in this context it is important to note that Black Lives Matter. Anyway, this is a borderline case and for me the coverage of national Cup finals etc with her champion club Rivers Angels is enough to nudge WP:GNG. Spiderone has claimed that caps for Nigeria's Super Falcons are well documented but I am not sure that this is always the case. For instance I found that John was named in the squad for two friendlies against Japan in September 2013, along with Ebubeleye Whyte. I haven't been able to find the teams for the Japan games but the coach praised the performances of both his goalkeepers, perhaps implying that John did play some part. John apparently played in a 2014 AWC warm up friendly against a male team before she was cut from the final squad. So she is there or thereabouts and - realistically - even if she didn't get on the pitch in Japan (or in any other games), that in itself won't make too much difference to her overall notability. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:51, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Delete The sources in the article do not provide significant coverage of the individual, failing WP:GNG, and I have been unable to find that the individual has played for the senior national team. All of the sources sited are just passing mentions of the individual, usually in the context of a team performance. The individual also has not played in a fully-professional league, so they fail WP:NFOOTY. As far as political comments unrelated to AfD, please take these comments elsewhere. Knowledge is not a soapbox and we are not here to right great wrongs, and AfD is certainly not the place to discuss changes to policy and guidelines. If you have issues with notability standards, take it up at the relevant talk pages i.e. WT:NSPORT. Jay eyem (talk) 17:19, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

I'm still surprised that it hasn't been taken up at WT:NSPORT yet. Spiderone 18:53, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

The result was delete. Clear consensus to delete, rationale in the sole keep vote weak at best, notability via national championship won is not supported by any guideline and whilst a Google search may bring back results, not specific links have been presented that might begin to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 22:22, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Amaechi Ojini

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. The article claims that Ojini is an international footballer but this is not supported by any reliable sources. Caps for Nigeria are documented by numerous sources so, if Ojini has been capped, we should be able to find evidence. For example, if we take Chiamaka Nnadozie, we can see evidence of her caps from multiple reliable sources such as Extra Time, GSA and Soccerway. Spiderone 21:52, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:53, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:53, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:53, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:53, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 21:57, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 22:24, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete does not meet our ludicrously broad inclusion criteria for footballers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:50, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Keep won Nigeria's top league championship in 2019.... appears to have a number of Google search results in a US-based search. Article could use expansion, not deletion per WP:ATD. Hmlarson (talk) 04:03, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

All mentions are very brief (only once or twice per article) and so this still doesn't pass GNG as the sources do not address her in-depth Spiderone 10:04, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Delete - Fails GNG Deathlibrarian (talk) 01:59, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Delete per WP:NFOOTBALL failure. Number 5 7 12:49, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 02:57, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

S.D. Gopinath

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nez Zealand businessman. No references are provided in the article and I could find nothing of note on the web. (the search is complicated by the existence of another SD Gopinath who appears to be a biologist with a few publications) I think he falls well short of the general notability criterion. Pichpich (talk) 20:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Pichpich (talk) 20:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Pichpich (talk) 20:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Pichpich (talk) 20:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Delete Self-promotional. DerbyCountyinNZ 21:06, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete Definitely self-promotional, not written from a neutral POV, and fails WP:BIO. Harland Q Pitt 22:59, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete. Purely promotional article that fails WP:GNG. Elms 01:50, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete No notability whatsoever. Schwede 66 15:01, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete another in an extremely long line of articles on non-notable businesspeople.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:07, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete no indication of notability.Faizal batliwala (talk) 14:14, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Delete Seemingly self-promotional.Deathlibrarian (talk) 00:18, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 02:58, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

List of artists who have performed at the Colston Hall

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable list. Seems to fall under WP:RAWDATA, as an indiscriminate collection of information –DMartin 20:23, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. –DMartin 20:23, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:12, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:12, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Delete per nom; Knowledge is not a directory of every band or singer that has performed at any particular venue. I respect the effort that has gone into this list but it clearly has no place in an encyclopaedia. There is no evidence that playing at this particular venue is a hugely notable distinction in the field of music that would warrant such an article. This list would be just as ludicrous as something like List of footballers who have played at Wembley or List of actors who have appeared on the BBC. Spiderone 21:22, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete per nom and Spiderone. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:30, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete - In agreement with the points made by the nominator and previous voters, because playing at that venue is not particularly a notable achievement and the list violates policies at WP:RAWDATA and WP:LISTN. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 23:23, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 04:49, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Dhawangupta (talk) 08:49, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
But, but, but it's the Colston Hall. (Delete per nom.) Clarityfiend (talk) 20:15, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete per nom - and as per Spiderone Deathlibrarian (talk) 00:19, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 18:55, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Elektra Festival

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Semi-advertorialized and unreferenced article about a digital arts festival, with no strong claim to passing our notability criteria for events. As always, every festival is not automatically entitled to a Knowledge article just because its existence is technically verifiable -- media coverage has to establish its importance for an article to be justified. But once I removed all the WP:ELNO-violating links threaded throughout the article body where a thing mentioned in the body text was offlinking to its own self-published website about itself instead of to a Knowledge article about it, there were literally no "references" left at all, much less any reliable or notability-supporting ones from real media. Bearcat (talk) 18:07, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 18:07, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 18:07, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 18:07, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Delete Is written like an advertisement. –Cupper52 18:44, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete per WP:PROMO. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 21:31, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

The result was speedily deleted per WP:G7 at request of creator and sole contributor. XOR'easter (talk) 20:19, 29 November 2020 (UTC) (non-admin closure)

Bad Jim

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I admit I created this article, but I understand now why it fails WP:NFSOURCES. A listing in Leonard Maltin's Movie Guide is considered "insufficient to fully establish notability" per WP:NFSOURCES. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 18:03, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:08, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:08, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:29, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Nayeem Ahmad Khan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a political and business figure, not reliably sourced as passing our notability criteria for either occupation. As written, the article does not claim that he's ever held any political role that would confer an automatic pass of WP:NPOL -- it says he was an organizer and activist, not an elected officeholder -- so the key to making him notable enough for inclusion would require getting him over WP:GNG on the sourcing. But there's just one reference here, which isn't enough by itself, and the article features a lot of completely unsourced biographical detail that falls somewhere along the line between original research and the possibility of outright conflict of interest. As I'm not an expert in locating Bangladeshi sources, I'm willing to withdraw this if somebody with Bengali language skills can improve the article to properly demonstrate his notability -- but in this form, it's not good enough. Bearcat (talk) 17:10, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:10, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:10, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:10, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Quick Delete. No single mention found by searching google with bengali keywords of his name ‘নাঈম আহমেদ খান’ or ‘মোহাম্মাদ নাঈম’।~Yahya (✉) • 17:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
~~Speedy~~ Delete. ~~This is absolutely not up to WP:BLP standards. For all we know, all of this article is completely made up, except what comes from that one tiny news story. Get it off the public-facing internet.~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hsplus (talk • contribs) 18:11, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Per Worldbruce's comments, I have changed my view from "speedy delete" to "delete." While the article as it is has few sources and is not WP:BLP-friendly, it is clearly about a notable figure, and a number of sources on this person exist if you use the terms provided below. With these sources, the article could be brought up to standards. But if it isn't updated, it should go. To be continued, Harry — Say hello! 04:42, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Delete. Does not appear to meet the biographical notability guideline, however, the article makes a credible claim of significance so A7 speedy deletion is inapplicable. As it has a single source, BLPPROD wouldn't apply either, so AFD is the right venue. SITH (talk) 20:59, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete - does not meet any of the above mentioned guidelines Spiderone 23:03, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Comment Without taking a position on the notability of the subject, I note that prior to nomination WP:SPAs and IPs had removed a reference and vandalized his name and biodata. Searches in Bengali, by his name as stated in the text at the time of nomination, and/or with keywords "Bangladeshi" or "businessman", would have found no results, because the subject is none of those things. Searches for "Nayeem Khan" with parties "Hurriyat Conference", "JKLF", or "JKNF" are more productive. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:32, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 13:33, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 13:37, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Delete Searching by his name revealed few third party sources however they are in the context of his arrest.Faizal batliwala (talk) 14:24, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Delete Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BLP Deathlibrarian (talk) 02:03, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

The result was keep. Missvain (talk) 02:58, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

List of religious movements that began in the United States

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is the potential for an article under this title but right now it is just a unsourced list based on Knowledge and is WP:OR. I've checked Knowledge:Manual of Style/Lists to see what the standards are for lists and I think that this one fails to include its selection criteria or how it is dating the origin of these movements. Also, this is a mix of denominations, churches, religious practices and religious movements. Liz 17:11, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:15, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:15, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

If you think there is potential for the article, then I suggest a Draftify.
- Oh dear. Looks like I forgot to sign my comment again. For those wondering, I made this !vote on the 14th. Foxnpichu (talk) 16:31, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Keep: per nom this list does need work, but I think it works well as a navigation list per WP:CLN / WP:AOAL. The page views are significant (7000+), I believe this shows the list has some interest / usefulness. No objection to Draft if there is a consensus for this option. I will try and do some work on the lead. // Timothy :: talk 12:07, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Comment: Liz, per my keep above, I have done a little work on the article, specifically the 18th century and the lead. I'd like you to take a look at 18th century; I think this is representative of what the article could become. I ask that you consider WP:CLN, "Consider that lists may include features not available to categories, and building a rudimentary list of links is a useful step in improving a list. Deleting these rudimentary lists is a waste of these building blocks" and the thought this could eventually evolve into a WP:SUMMARYSTYLE article.

I agree that the selection criteria needs clarity. I know this is backassward (pardon), but because the list already exists, I think this could be clarified as someone goes through and improves the list. The bigger problem is the bias. I'd be willing to work on this (slowly) if the list is kept. // Timothy :: talk 15:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 16:01, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:48, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Keep Easily passes WP:LISTN as there are entire books on the subject including: New Age, Neopagan, and New Religious Movements – Alternative Spirituality in Contemporary America; Mystics and Messiahs – Cults and New Religions in American History; The New Religious Movements Experience in America. And note that the page has existed for over 16 years with attention from dozens of editors. See also WP:NEXIST and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 21:53, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Keep Long established page that satisfies WP:LISTN. Elms 02:52, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Keep, meets WP:LISTN, numerous books cover groups of members of this list, some brought out above, also fulfills navigational purpose, as for apparent confusion over what should be included ("Also, this is a mix of denominations, churches, religious practices and religious movements"), that is a matter for the talkpage. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:06, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

The result was delete. The concerns about the references being promotional material have not been convincingly addressed. Sandstein 22:01, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Hadelin de Ponteves

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable business person sourced to press releases and blackhat seo (ie. Statesman inspo hub, asianet newsables, etc...) no real meaningful in depth coverage. Praxidicae (talk) 12:59, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:45, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:45, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Delete another in a very long line of articles on non-notable businessmen.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:25, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Keep: Clearly passes the WP:GNG as sources provide significant coverage in reliable sources. The references in no way look like Press release articles to me and address the person directly and in detail.-Iqra S. Shaikh (talk) 17:58, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Except they are literally press releases or paid for black hat seo and those that aren't are WP:UGEN like this. Praxidicae (talk) 18:40, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Admit that odsc and codementor appear to be self published sources but were used only to support the content in the article. I have removed those references from the page. As far as other sources are concerned, they are mainstream newspapers in India (CCN News 18 being one of the top 5 News channel in India) and are considered as secondary, reliable sources covering the subject in detail. They are definitely not press releases, neither did they look like paid articles to me as I have seen many articles on Knowledge being cited to these same sources and they all have been written in the same manner.Iqra S. Shaikh (talk) 11:58, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

News18 is one of the top offenders of churnalism, so no. Praxidicae (talk) 13:44, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Delete As per nom. 1292simon (talk) 21:12, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Weak keep While reliability of certain sources is questionable i would lean towards a weak keep as enough coverage here to satisfy SIGCOV. According to cited sources, a Google employee having developed an online course which is being used by over 1.6 million.Faizal batliwala (talk) 14:50, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Would you mind providing what sources exactly you believe to satisfy SIGCOV? Press releases and self published crap don't satisfy that. 1.6 million people is a drop in the bucket. We don't use view count or instagram followers for notability, why would we use it for this? Praxidicae (talk) 15:27, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Comment - can it be improved? Seems like an odd collection of citations unrelated to his being notable in the field of AI or his Google course. If there are reliable citations available supporting the coursework or his contributions in AI I think it would help.10Sany1? (talk) 02:31, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz 20:43, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Keep: as per WP:GNG.Ruqayya ansari (talk) 13:00, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Of the three remaining sources, they are all press releases. How exactly does that make him notable? Praxidicae (talk) 19:59, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Also this is from Newsable, not actually Asianetnews. Praxidicae (talk) 20:01, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Asianetnews is a Malayalam language news channel, English version of which is Asianet Newsable. See this It is a popular news channel in India and considered as WP:Reliable Sources.Ruqayya ansari (talk) 15:08, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Even reliable sources publish press releases, or in this case, regurgitated press releases which is evident by the poorly written content, puffy language and lack of an author. If I were to remove all the press releases from this article, we'd have 0 sources to discuss, so that says more than the baseless keep votes here. It also begs the question as to why all the sources are Indian media, and yet no French sources or other major media outlets are covering this person...Praxidicae (talk) 15:11, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:45, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Delete as purely promotional with no real claim of notability. Guy wrote book and founded company is not the basis for an encyclopaedia entry. Mccapra (talk) 15:52, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete as promotional fluff, as Mccapra and Praxidicae pointed out. XOR'easter (talk) 20:23, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:50, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Comment: Praxidicae, why are you removing the Statesman article from the page while I disgree with your arguements and the discussion is still open? If it was a press release article, there would have been some sort of evidence. Since there is no disclaimer or any indication in the article, i don't really think it is a press release. As i mentioned before, there are hundreds of pages on Knowledge that have been cited to these references and have been written in the same manner, so are you claiming they are all paid or press release articles?-Iqra S. Shaikh (talk) 08:20, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

The result was merge to Niels Bohr Institute. Missvain (talk) 19:00, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Cosmic Dawn Center

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have done a BEFORE search and not found three sources demonstrating that this research center is a notable organization. Will be open to withdrawing my nomination if someone could provide the requisite three reliable, independent sources that substantively mentino the center. Current reliable sources are either automatically generated (e.g. ) or not substantively covering the institute itself (e.g. ). Sam-2727 (talk) 21:39, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Sam-2727 (talk) 21:39, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Sam-2727 (talk) 21:39, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Merge, probably with Niels Bohr Institute: I also can't find sources to establish independent notability, but the lead and the research section look to contain some encyclopedic and verifiable information that could make a useful section on the page of one of the umbrella organisations that created this centre. - Astrophobe (talk) 22:19, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:44, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Selective merge to Niels Bohr Institute. There's just not a lot to be said about it, and a paucity of worthwhile sources (job postings and press releases from affiliated organizations aren't really material to build an article upon). Between the two possible merge targets, the Institute and DTU Space, the former seems preferable as the primary affiliation of the center's director . XOR'easter (talk) 20:37, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

The result was delete. Eddie891 _Work 17:07, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Rowena Simpson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a smalltown mayor, not reliably sourced as passing WP:NPOL #2. As always, mayors are not automatically notable just for existing as mayors, and just having been the first woman mayor of her own small town isn't an automatic notability clincher either -- and notability is not inherited, so she also isn't entitled to special treatment just because her husband (who was a provincial MLA) has an article. Rather, the notability test for mayors hinges on the ability to write and source some genuine substance about her political significance -- specific things she did in office, specific impacts she had on the development of the town, and on and so forth -- and not just on the ability to offer technical verification that she existed. But the sourcing here consists of the town's own primary source website about itself, a glancing namecheck of her existence in an article about her nephew, and just one article about her initial election as mayor, which is not nearly enough. Bearcat (talk) 14:58, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:58, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:58, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 16:05, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Delete Fails WP:GNG pretty clearly and does not pass WP:NPOL. A sentence mention of her at the town's article may be appropriate. SportingFlyer T·C 16:09, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete she was mayor of a place with less than 1000 people. If she were to be considered notable we would at least double the size of Knowledge with the number of mayors we would be considering notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:05, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

The result was delete. Eddie891 _Work 17:09, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Asamajjathi Adaraya

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to address any of the criteria under WP:NBOOK, lacks any independent reliable secondary sources per WP: GNG. Dan arndt (talk) 12:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 12:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 12:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Redirect to Bharatha Prabhashana Thennakoon. Mccapra (talk) 15:54, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete neither the author nor the book are notable. Praxidicae (talk) 15:58, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Delete per apparent lack of notability. Noahfgodard (talk) 16:29, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Delete: I agree with nom. The included references are just routine coverage. Fails in-depth coverage requirement to meet WP:GNG and no additional criteria for WP:NBOOK. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 07:14, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. JGHowes 01:21, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

United Kennel Clubs International

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. Completely non-notable kennel club that purports to be an umbrella organisation for national kennel clubs like the Fédération Cynologique Internationale, the article has no sources and an extensive search has found nothing attributable. Cavalryman (talk) 12:38, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:04, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:04, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Delete, fails WP:NCORP. Three verifiable mentions on Gbooks, one mention on Scholar. There are several of these international associations of breed-clubs-that-aren't-actually-the-breed-club-at-all. Comparison of the list of members of this thing with our List of kennel clubs (making no claim that our list is entirely accurate) shows no overlap whatsoever – this is a non-notable confederation of non-notable entities. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:09, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:26, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Ilanga Kella

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to satisfy any of the criteria under WP:NBOOK. Unable to find any independent reliable secondary sources that would address WP: GNG Dan arndt (talk) 12:39, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 12:39, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 12:39, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Delete: I agree with nom. The included references are just routine coverage. Fails in-depth coverage requirement to meet WP:GNG and no additional criteria for WP:NBOOK. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 06:36, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

The result was delete. Eddie891 _Work 17:09, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Tahir Guest Palace

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable business that only has passing mentions. The sources in article is not sufficient to demonstrate WP:N. Lord Grandwell (talk) 11:16, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Lord Grandwell (talk) 11:16, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:20, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:20, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Delete. I could only find a few mentions in Nigerian papers, but they were more about the businessman who owns it or just mentioned it as a venue of some event. It does not seem to be anything more than a WP:MILL hotel. - Tristan Surtel (talk) 20:17, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete Not notable. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:37, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete non notable. Ajf773 (talk) 23:38, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Delete per all of the above, and my own standards for hotels. This is actually a great test case. It is in a major city (2nd largest in Nigeria), is large for its location, and has large conference facilities. It's been in some tour guides, but the listings are brief. There were some political meetings there. I can't figure out how old it is, but it's much less than 60 years old. But that's all I could find. If you do find more, please ping me. Bearian (talk) 01:56, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

The Cheese Impresario

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ten year old BLP of a promotional nature and doubtful notability. Mccapra (talk) 10:17, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 10:17, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 10:17, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 10:17, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

The result was delete. Eddie891 _Work 17:10, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Lisa Stanley sings the hits of Masie Mcdaniel (album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG; fails ~~all 12 tests of WP:SINGER~~ single test of WP:ALBUM (thanks, User:doomsdayer520) Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:53, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:59, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:00, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Delete. Per nom, this album does not meet the notability guidelines. Either WP:NALBUM (charts/sales/awards) or WP:GNG (coverage/depth). Searches of the (general) news press in Ireland or (specific) music press in Ireland return no coverage at all. Even a a related Google Search returns ONLY reults from Knowledge and mirrors. I also, personally, have significant WP:PROMO and WP:COI concerns. I would recommend that this AfD discussion be expanded to include the other album articles created in the same pattern of edits. Which, in my opinion, should also be considered for deletion. The nominated article should definitely be deleted. Guliolopez (talk) 14:07, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Comment - The nominator has recommended that the album be deleted, but cited the unrelated guideline WP:NSINGER which would be relevant for the musician's biographical article. The correct guideline here is the 7-point WP:NALBUM. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:55, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Totally unnotable. ser! (let's discuss it). 20:49, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete. Fails all notability requirements per WP:GNG and WP:NALBUMS. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars 16:58, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:52, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

List of tallest buildings in Sarasota

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This would be a PROD in usual circumstances but, since some of the people that created the article are still active users, they may wish to make a keep argument.

This fails WP:LISTN for multiple reasons:

Firstly, the list has no navigational purpose as the overwhelming majority of the buildings featured are not notable enough for their own Knowledge article.
Secondly, this topic does not have WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS. Database listings in Emporis, Skyscrapernews and Skyscraperpage do not constitute significant coverage.
I see no evidence that the topic 'List of tallest buildings in Sarasota' is covered as a group by reliable secondary sources but I am happy to be proved wrong here.
No significant high-rise building under construction so little chance of future notability; no point in sending to draft.
The city is not the largest in Florida nor is it the capital.
This city has fewer than 60 000 residents. A stand-alone article makes no sense.
I really do not believe that a building being taller than 46m makes it notable. We do not set the bar so low in Tampa so why are we doing it here?

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:32, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:32, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:32, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Comment - in my opinion, this should be deleted as per the same reasons as List of tallest buildings in Bradenton, Florida Spiderone 09:33, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Comment - I think that it should be kept because the buildings are actually somewhat tall. The tallest buildings in Bradenton article had buildings in it that were no where near the height of ones in Sarasota. For example, the Estonia article has some of it's top buildings as tall as those in Sarasota. In my opinion, I think the buildings heights are notable in the way that their heights are comparable to many of those in the articles for a city or a country's tallest buildings. However I don't think the structures themselves are very notable as many of them do not have their own Knowledge pages. Seeing if a building has a Knowledge page is a good way of vetting whether or not they are notable. Skim 13:53, 29 November (UTC)
Delete. The list does not contain particularly tall or notable buildings. It is also problematic in its current form, as in the text the article admits to being a mirror of Emporis. - Tristan Surtel (talk) 20:21, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

I agree. It's a blatant violation of WP:NOTMIRROR just like several other "list of tallest buildings in ___" articles Spiderone 21:35, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Delete Nothing in the list shows that it needs separate article. Sachin.cba (talk) 08:56, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete per all of the above and my own standards for such lists. Bearian (talk) 02:02, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Delete: Fails WP:LISTN does not have WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS discussing this as a group. The city is not notable for tall buildings and the buildings are not notably tall. The list does not meet WP:CLN, there is nothing there that can assist in navigation. // Timothy :: talk 17:27, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

The result was speedy delete per G5. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:21, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Aoi Eiga

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Current sources don't establish WP:GNG Sliekid (talk) 09:05, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Sliekid (talk) 09:05, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 09:14, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 09:15, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Delete As per nom. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:09, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:52, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Iliya Yame Kwache

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable politician. Doesn't satisfy WP:NPOL Was previously deleted earlier. Sliekid (talk) 09:01, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sliekid (talk) 09:01, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 09:13, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 09:13, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 09:14, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Delete Fails GNG. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:10, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete. People do not get articles just for being unsuccessful candidates for political office, but nothing else in the article demonstrates that he had preexisting notability for other reasons independent of the candidacy. Bearcat (talk) 15:24, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete a non-notable failed candidate for public office.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:39, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

The result was redirect to Martian (The War of the Worlds). Eddie891 _Work 17:12, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Heat-Ray

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a largely non-notable and GNG-failing topic. Already described in the main article at The War of the Worlds#Weapons and armour, so a separate article is unnecessary. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 08:38, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 08:38, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 08:38, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 08:38, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Redirect/Merge to Martian (The War of the Worlds), and I would probably recommend the same for the other articles on the very specific weapons used by the Martians such as Red weed and Black smoke (The War of the Worlds). While there are, of course, mentions of the specific weapons in various sources discussing the novel and adaptations of War of the Worlds, I am not finding anything that would justify it being split off into its own article, rather than being covered as part of the overall topic of the Martians and their technology. Rorshacma (talk) 20:35, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Redirect to Martian (The War of the Worlds), which already covers this weapon in more than enough detail. There is no need for a WP:SPLIT here. Devonian Wombat (talk) 11:22, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Redirect - There seem to be a few sources talking about it in some context, but it can just be used to help to bolster the article if they're not already included. There's little need for a separate article TTN (talk) 13:32, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Redirect No stand alone notability shown. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:11, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

The result was redirect to Martian (The War of the Worlds). Eddie891 _Work 17:13, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Black smoke (The War of the Worlds)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 08:22, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 08:22, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 08:22, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Redirect/Merge to Martian (The War of the Worlds) - Much like the also-nominated Heat-Ray, while the black smoke is mentioned in summaries and discussions of the various incarnation of War of the Worlds, there is nothing showing that it is independently notable enough to have a separate article, rather than being covered on the overall topic of the Martians. Rorshacma (talk) 20:37, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Redirect to Martian (The War of the Worlds), which already covers this weapon in more than enough detail. There is no need for a WP:SPLIT here. Devonian Wombat (talk) 11:21, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete Knowledge is not supposed to be building articles on fictional things directly from the fictional works where they appear.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:22, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Redirect to Martian (The War of the Worlds), slight chance it is a searchable term, not notable enough for stand-alone article. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:47, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

The result was Delete/redirect. There is consensus to redirect Daria S. Ustinova and to delete the three others. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 14:21, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Emily Escobedo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Competitive swimmer who does not meet any of the criteria in sports notability guidelines or in general notability. There isn't a guideline for swimmers, and there should be, but until there is, this article can be in draft space. Subject has not competed in the Olympic Games and does not appear to have had other significant coverage. One of several competitive swimmers who have had articles, mostly stubs, written by team manager, who is conflict of interest editor.

Escobedo was tagged for A7 but A7 was declined. Already is also in draft space. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:59, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:59, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:59, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:59, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Ustinova was tagged for A7 fur A7 was declined. Richards was tagged for A7 but A7 was declined. Golding was tagged for A7 but A7 was declined. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:15, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:16, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:16, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 06:17, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Delete Emily Escobedo, Matthew Richards (swimmer) & Chloe Golding, Redirect Daria S. Ustinova to Daria Ustinova - At present unreferenced one liners. From discussions elsewhere these seem to have been created to promote New York Breakers/International Swimming League. If there was s SNG for swimming, I doubt the participation in the ISL would be considered an indicator of notability. This is a non-FINA sanctioned competition starting in 2019. Most established swimmers haven't signed up and the majority of those competing are upcoming youngsters. Although Escobedo, Richards and Golding have had successes in junior competition, it's a case of WP:TOOSOON to have their own articles. Ustinova already has an article Daria Ustinova. --John B123 (talk) 11:40, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete all none meet inclusion criteria.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:28, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Comment - I concur with User:John B123 that Daria S. Ustinova should be redirected to Daria Ustinova. It was an omission by both the originator and the nominator (me) that we did not notice the existing article. The existing article should be kept (and has not been nominated for deletion) because she competed in the 2016 Olympic Games, satisfying one of the few sports notability criteria that applies to swimmers. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:24, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

I missed it too when I tagged the article for A7. --John B123 (talk) 17:28, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Mbdfar (talk) 17:36, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

List of chefs

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unlimited and unmaintainable list of all chefs on Knowledge. Organization of a topic of this caliber should be left to categories, not infinite lists. The original AFD was delete. Mbdfar (talk) 04:29, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Withdrawn by nominator - thanks to postdlf for pointing me to WP:LISTPURP. That answers all the questions that I had. Cheers, Mbdfar (talk) 17:33, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Comment. I'd like to dispose of it (being a card-carrying deletionist) ... but how is it any different from all the other Category:lists of people by occupation, e.g. List of computer scientists? Clarityfiend (talk) 06:03, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Clarityfiend:, I don't see it as being any different, and if people agree with the deletion of this list perhaps those would be next. Then followed by notable people from cities and notable college alumni lists. I guess I just don't understand the benefit of having both massive, unwieldy lists, as well categories. These lists are not user friendly; do people really look for one specific article from a list of hundreds of chefs from the 21st century? Categories are more specific, better organized, and more inclusive (categories are almost always quickly and correctly assigned, I'm sure fewer editors add new articles to lists such as this). I bet this topic has been discussed before, but I'm just curious what the general sentiment is now. This has been on my mind working with Knowledge:WikiProject Orphanage recently. Is it worth creating more of these massive lists, such as List of Italian football players, even if categories make it redundant? Is this really a good way to build the web? Mbdfar (talk) 16:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 06:09, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 06:09, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 06:10, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 07:19, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Keep as standard index of people by occupation per LISTPURP and NOTDUP. The nom’s expressed antipathy towards all such lists generally is not a valid deletion argument, and makes it clear that there is no rationale specific to this list. postdlf (talk) 16:45, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

The result was delete. czar 05:54, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Formiga (footballer, born 1995)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about footballer who has only played semi-professionally except for a 5-minute appearance in the Copa do Brasil and a 4-minute cameo in the Campeonato Brasileiro Série C. There is no online Portuguese-language coverage of this footballer other than database entries, match reports and transfer announcements (and nothing at all which would be in-depth coverage). According to soccerway.com, he hasn't played semi-professionally since 2018. Although having played in a few minutes in a fully-pro league match creates a presumption of notability under WP:NFOOTBALL, there is a long-standing consensus that when an article comprehensively fails WP:GNG as this does, the presumption isn't valid. Jogurney (talk) 04:13, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 06:11, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 06:11, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 06:11, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU 06:14, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Delete per nom - scraping by on NFOOTBALL insufficient if there is no coverage. There is more than expected, but not enough. Giant Snowman 08:33, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete I would hate to see what would happen if we applied similar criteria for notability to professors the way we do to football players. Just imagine if "he was the teacher of record for one course at a top tier university" was enough to make someone notable. Or maybe "he published one peer reviewed article in an academic journal."John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:31, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete per all of the above - not enough coverage to justify keeping an article on someone who has played 9 mins of professional football Spiderone 18:29, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:51, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Tule Station, California

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn't find any such feature on topographic maps looking on the west shore of Owens Lake, and the topos there go back to the late 19th century. Newspapers.com hits are for features in other counties and a few referencing a train station that would fit in this general area. Not seeing any way WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG is met. Hog Farm _Bacon 04:06, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 04:06, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 04:06, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Delete. Per nom. No demonstration of notability. Yilloslime (talk) 22:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:51, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Intake, Butte County, California

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Intake, Inyo County, California. I'm not convinced there was ever anything here to be a "former settlement". One building at the presumed site on the 1888 topo; it disappears quickly. By 1970, the power plant referenced in the article appears, although there is no feature clearly labeled "intake". Newspapers.com brings up a couple uses as a local landmark re road construction in the early 20th century, this could be what's referenced. This suggests it's just an intake. There was definitely a feature in Butte County known as Intake, based on the newspaper.com mentions, but none of them actually described the place. Looks to probably fail WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND. Hog Farm _Bacon 03:24, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 03:24, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 03:24, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy delete Not even a GNIS entry, not in Gudde's California Place Names. Reywas92 00:39, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:49, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Abhay Kant Pathak

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Checked in the news; it's a developing story about a government official who is now enjoying limelight due to ongoing investigation against him and his son. As of now, the subject fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO and lacks WP:SIGCOV . Hatchens (talk) 02:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:29, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:29, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Delete. As things stand, he's a WP:BLP1E at best — and if the 1E is a criminal allegation which has not yet been adjudicated in a court of law, then we also have to measure it against WP:PERP. People do not get articles just for being arrested. Bearcat (talk) 15:26, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete nothing here rises above news coverage of the arrest of a government official.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:46, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Keep As the page creator, I will point to the thousands of hits in Google or Google News which show that this page meets WP:DIVERSE, WP:PERSISTENCE, and WP:INDEPTH.

The result was delete. czar 03:17, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Intake, Inyo County, California

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Don't know what Durham says about it, but the topos clearly label it as the intake for the aqueduct where water is drawn from the Owens River. This doesn't fit any of the CSD criteria, but there's absolutely no reason why we should have an article on this. Blatantly terrible stub mass-creation with no regard to checking anything about accuracy. Hog Farm _Bacon 01:29, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 01:29, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 01:29, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Delete I'm having trouble locating a place labelled "intake" on the map, but the lack of suitable sources combined with the supposed location at the end of an aqueduct tells me all I need to know. –dlthewave ☎ 02:51, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- Dlthewave - Here's a representative map. "Intake" is near the top center of the map, just below Aberdeen and Hines Spring. Hog Farm _Bacon 03:04, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete - based on the map that User:Hog Farm posted, "Intake" is in the same font as the LA Aqueduct and the rail line, but it is not the same font as the the populated places. It's a location, but not a populated place. Chris857 (talk) 06:09, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete. No post office :-). Searching newspapers.com for "Intake Inyo" came up with a number of hits for fishing concerning the Los Angeles Aqueduct intake, where intake was not capitalized. A 1912 newspaper article states that the intake was so modest as to be unimpressive. JSTOR found nothing of interest. GBooks did find which says that there was a phone line to "Intake", which was capitalized. This was the only reference I found that was capitalized. Chalfant's The Story of Inyo mentions the intake twice, in lower case. At best there was a non-notable construction camp at this location. As the location is not legally recognized and there is at best trivial coverage, #1 and #2 of WP:GEOLAND are not met. Cxbrx (talk) 16:53, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

The result was Procedural close to move to userspace. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 02:24, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Response to Peer Reviews

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page appears to be a response to Knowledge peer reviews, however it somehow ended up as an article. The nature of the text of the article seems to violate WP:NOTESSAY. JJP...MASTER!_{JJP... master? Edit: It turns out that the "peer review" mentioned in the title refers to a peer review for a Wiki Education assignment.} 00:37, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Move to user space In a situation like this, a helpful response would be to move the page to the user's space (without leaving a redirect), which is likely where it ought to have been in the first place. In this case, I would have moved it to User:Haleymendlin/Response to Peer Reviews. If you agree, we can speedy-close this nomination and move it. Largoplazo (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy move to user space and close. It's not an article and wasn't meant to be created in main space. It is from a Wiki Education student. There isn't really anything else to discuss. Dylsss 01:50, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 03:00, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

HotKid

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

it fails WP:BAND No evidence of Notability and the sources provided on the article are not Knowledge relieble sources Samat lib (talk) 08:22, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Samat lib (talk) 00:10, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions Samat lib (talk) 00:12, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Samat lib (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 November 29. —_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:30, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Delete Agree as per WP:BAND Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:12, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete. Independent search fails to turn up anything that would satisfy WP:BAND. Elms 14:49, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete Non notable band. NBAND not met -Xclusivzik (talk) 12:21, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

The result was delete. czar 03:17, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Cherilee Taylor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Effectively a WP:BLPPROD-type situation: WP:BLP article with no inline sourcing, and no true secondary sourcing at all. Subject was main cast (for just two seasons) in only a single Canadian TV soap opera, and doesn't appear to have any other major roles, so it's unlikely she passes WP:NACTOR. However, I can find no secondary coverage at all of the subject, so clearly a WP:BASIC fail (and, again, this is effectively a WP:BLPPROD situation currently). --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:27, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:27, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:27, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 00:31, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 00:31, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Delete My standards and Knowledge's were quite different than when I made this in 2005. The reason there was no inline sourcing, is that Knowledge didn't have the convenient "ref" system currently used, and expectations were quite different. There are reliable third party sources to confirm she did star in Paradise Falls (findable in proquest), but are largely about Paradise Falls, not her. If you want to go after the other less known actor bios on this show that I did, go ahead, but I suggest doing a simple redirect to show would be easier than AFD, as the show itself is easily notable. --Rob (talk) 03:02, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Delete Does not meet our inclusion criteria for actresses. It shocks me how long some articles on clearly not notable people have stood.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:22, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

The result was speedy delete per WP:G7 at request of creator and sole contributor. XOR'easter (talk) 15:31, 29 November 2020 (UTC) (non-admin closure)

George Touliatos

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I admit I created this article but I understand now why it fails WP:NACTOR. He’s only had one significant role as George in Dreams Beyond Memory. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 00:07, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 00:29, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 00:29, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 00:29, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 00:30, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 00:32, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

If that's the case, please tag it with the {{db-author}} template to nominate it for deletion if you are the creator. JJP...MASTER!_{JJP... master?} 02:16, 29 November 2020 (UTC)