Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Sputnikmusic (2nd nomination) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

280:
yet. Furthermore, with the constant vandalism our page receives from problem users at our site, a lot of problems arise. It is our goal to meet Knowledge (XXG)'s standards; unfortunately, I don't have a lot of time at this very moment to fix the page. It's going to take quite a bit of work on my end to fix things and meet your guidelines, so I hope that asking for a little more patience, considering this account was just launched within the week, wouldn't be too much to ask. Thanks for your time. -
279:
This account was registered for the sole purpose of maintaining our page and establishing credibility and general notability guidelines due to the incessant vandalism our page receives from problem users. This was only registered a couple days ago, and we haven't had any time to fix our page as of
358:
Another important aspect of sputnikmusic.com's credibility is that the staff reviewers routinely get promotional material sent to them by big labels including Columbia, Epitaph, Victory, among others. While this is not like a citation in the AP in that it can't be linked as a resource, there is
490:, but - with all respect - the article has been in this condition for quite a while. If there's some independent press that may demonstrate notability, now is the time to bring it to the article, if it's not already too late. (EC) 477:
with no bias toward re-creation as a properly sourced article. There isn't enough data here to demonstrate notability - additional, independant sources would help immensely toward that end. Some of the article hints of possible
323: 99: 94: 89: 84: 315:
Sputnikmusic was not formerly known as Musicianforums- they were two separate entities and the latter was assimilated by the former, and is still practically distinct from the parent site.
154: 414: 182: 162: 79: 297: 330:; Sputnikmusic has been cited in publicity material by a wide variety of highly successful bands, artists and publicity agencies, including 460:. If notability could be demonstrated, I'd be happy to clean up the article. Certain parts (Like News) jump out at me and look like ads. 301: 519: 496: 318:
Sputnikmusic's staff is generally considered to be one of the most reliable of its kind; the web's largest review aggregation website
223: 218: 17: 227: 127: 122: 523: 500: 469: 444: 429: 404: 388: 369: 351: 284: 272: 210: 131: 61: 267: 114: 186: 465: 540: 36: 253:, appears to have been redirected without consensus, and I also am nominating it for deletion with Sputnikmusic. -- 510: 293: 190: 539:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
439: 326:
turns up two million results; the website has been mentioned in several mainstream media publications, such as
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
485: 289: 281: 185:. Musicianforums received no press coverage. Collectively, sputnikmusic has not received enough coverage in 482:, which would need work. I appreciate that the subject has attempted to correct information presented here ( 365: 198: 335: 322:
lists Sputnikmusic among its sources (almost all, if not all, of which have wikipedia entries); a simple
214: 360: 348: 206: 423: 359:
something to be said for being considered valuable by those producing and marketing the music. --
261: 58: 514: 491: 118: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
327: 479: 453: 339: 401: 166: 173:
that "Sputnikmusic.com (is) a community-driven site featuring CD reviews." Sputnikmusic
457: 194: 254: 178: 174: 110: 68: 52: 244: 148: 461: 398: 385: 331: 170: 438:
Please find more sourcing, and will change. Doesn't quite pass muster. •
533:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
319: 250: 240: 236: 232: 144: 140: 136: 509:
Nevermind - The user in question appears to have been
100:
Articles for deletion/Sputnikmusic (5th nomination)
95:
Articles for deletion/Sputnikmusic (4th nomination)
90:
Articles for deletion/Sputnikmusic (3rd nomination)
85:
Articles for deletion/Sputnikmusic (2nd nomination)
39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 543:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 413:: This debate has been included in the 77: 396:-- notability not yet demonstrated. -- 197:article on the topic. The topic fails 308:Just a couple of issues to point out: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 175:formally was known as Musicianforums 201:and the article should be deleted. 169:press Sputnikmusic could muster is 75: 415:list of Websites-related deletions 177:. Musicianforums now redirects to 171:a mention in the The Capital Times 80:Articles for deletion/Sputnikmusic 24: 338:; and in retail outlets such as 405:21:33, 23 September 2007 (UTC) 389:05:30, 23 September 2007 (UTC) 370:05:07, 26 September 2007 (UTC) 352:21:29, 22 September 2007 (UTC) 285:19:06, 22 September 2007 (UTC) 273:14:48, 22 September 2007 (UTC) 193:of Sputnikmusic to develop an 1: 199:general notability guidelines 181:and previously was listed at 524:15:02, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 501:14:55, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 470:14:36, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 445:13:33, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 430:13:31, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 62:18:58, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 560: 251:an extensive edit history 536:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 384:. Non-notable website. 74:AfDs for this article: 466:contributionatoration 368:comment was added at 302:few or no other edits 480:Conflict of Interest 304:outside this topic. 486:SputnikmusicReviews 290:SputnikmusicReviews 282:SputnikmusicReviews 366:signed but undated 324:Google hits search 522: 499: 432: 427: 418: 372: 305: 551: 538: 518: 495: 442: 421: 420:—User:Ceyockey ( 419: 409: 403: 363: 287: 270: 264: 259: 248: 230: 187:reliable sources 161:Two years after 152: 134: 55: 51: 34: 559: 558: 554: 553: 552: 550: 549: 548: 547: 541:deletion review 534: 468: 440: 397: 332:Epitaph Records 268: 262: 255: 221: 205: 167:reliable source 125: 109: 106: 104: 72: 53: 49: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 557: 555: 546: 545: 529: 528: 527: 526: 504: 503: 472: 464: 447: 441:Lawrence Cohen 433: 407: 391: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 373: 345: 344: 343: 316: 310: 309: 306: 276: 275: 207:Musicianforums 159: 158: 105: 103: 102: 97: 92: 87: 82: 76: 73: 71: 66: 64: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 556: 544: 542: 537: 531: 530: 525: 521: 516: 512: 508: 507: 506: 505: 502: 498: 493: 489: 487: 481: 476: 473: 471: 467: 463: 459: 455: 451: 448: 446: 443: 437: 434: 431: 426: 425: 416: 412: 408: 406: 402: 400: 395: 392: 390: 387: 383: 380: 379: 371: 367: 362: 357: 356: 355: 354: 353: 350: 346: 341: 337: 333: 329: 325: 321: 317: 314: 313: 312: 311: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 286: 283: 278: 277: 274: 271: 265: 260: 258: 252: 246: 242: 238: 234: 229: 225: 220: 216: 212: 208: 204: 203: 202: 200: 196: 192: 188: 184: 180: 176: 172: 168: 164: 156: 150: 146: 142: 138: 133: 129: 124: 120: 116: 112: 108: 107: 101: 98: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 81: 78: 70: 67: 65: 63: 60: 59: 57: 56: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 535: 532: 483: 474: 449: 436:Weak delete. 435: 422: 410: 393: 381: 361:DFelon204409 328:The Guardian 256: 195:attributable 179:Sputnikmusic 160: 111:Sputnikmusic 69:Sputnikmusic 48: 45: 43: 31: 28: 452:- possible 450:Weak Delete 364:—Preceding 300:) has made 191:independent 165:, the only 424:talk to me 320:Metacritic 349:Anylayman 189:that are 520:Evidence 497:Evidence 488:, above) 336:Sony/BMG 298:contribs 257:Jreferee 155:View log 511:blocked 340:Buy.com 224:protect 219:history 128:protect 123:history 475:Delete 462:OSborn 454:WP:COI 394:Delete 382:Delete 249:- has 228:delete 132:delete 46:Delete 456:, no 399:A. B. 386:Keb25 245:views 237:watch 233:links 163:AfD#1 149:views 141:watch 137:links 54:demon 16:< 484:see 458:WP:N 411:Note 334:and 294:talk 241:logs 215:talk 211:edit 145:logs 119:talk 115:edit 417:. 347:-- 183:AfD 153:– ( 515:ZZ 513:. 492:ZZ 428:) 296:• 288:— 243:| 239:| 235:| 231:| 226:| 222:| 217:| 213:| 147:| 143:| 139:| 135:| 130:| 126:| 121:| 117:| 517:~ 494:~ 342:. 292:( 269:C 266:/ 263:T 247:) 209:( 157:) 151:) 113:( 50:^

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
demon

18:58, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Sputnikmusic
Articles for deletion/Sputnikmusic
Articles for deletion/Sputnikmusic (2nd nomination)
Articles for deletion/Sputnikmusic (3rd nomination)
Articles for deletion/Sputnikmusic (4th nomination)
Articles for deletion/Sputnikmusic (5th nomination)
Sputnikmusic
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
AfD#1
reliable source
a mention in the The Capital Times
formally was known as Musicianforums
Sputnikmusic
AfD
reliable sources
independent

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.