809:
article on the politician which goes into detail about that, but includes little or no other data. This is unacceptable because it gives undue weight to the controversy. If there is already an existing article about the politician, you may seek to add information about the property dispute to the politician's article. However, even though the politician's involvement in a property dispute may be
49:
915:
214:
133:
1272:
Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia – a tertiary source. If what you want to say is genuinely verifiable, then it should be possible to find at least one reputable and respected authority who says the same thing in pretty much the same words. It's fine to summarize the arguments of other authorities,
1222:
whereas others are valuable contributors, and it's perfectly reasonable to consider some editors to be your wiki-friends, but when there is a dispute about content, no one should see themselves as being on a team. Doing so tends to make every edit, and every talk page comment, appear to be something
1300:
If you feel that you are "on the brink" of becoming a tendentious editor on a certain article, it can often help to take a break. Don't edit or even look at the article for a day – or even a week. It will still be there when you get back. After all, there are 6.8 million other articles to edit, and
867:
is always biased against their sources, wording or point of view. The purpose of independent input is to resolve disputes between editors by a neutral third party. That doesn't mean the neutral third party will make everyone happy, will choose a side, or in particular, will side with whoever claims
249:
Editors who engage in this behavior generally fall into two categories: those who come to realize the problem their edits cause, recognise their own bias, and work productively with editors with opposing views to build a better encyclopedia – and the rest. The rest often end up indefinitely blocked
1256:
First and foremost, however bad you believe the faults of your accusers are, think long and hard about your own behavior. Critique it in your mind with the same vigour with which you critique theirs. Is there not at least a germ of truth in what they say? Have you perhaps been less civil than you
1015:
On the other hand, editors can also be genuinely troubled about ways they have been treated by others, and such sincere soul-searching should be treated with kindness. An editor who worries out loud about whether or not continuing to edit is worth it, particularly when not made conditional on a
1296:
other editors to find a compromise wording. This may take a great deal of patient, civil discussion on the talk page. Once you have done that, however, and hammered out a consensus-supported wording, this text will be defended by all parties and is far less likely to be skewed by future edits.
808:
to a single aspect of a subject. For example, you might know that there is some controversy surrounding a particular politician's behaviour with regard to a property dispute. You may be very interested in that dispute, and be keen to document the politician's role in it. So you would create an
344:
Even a slow-motion edit war, perhaps involving one revert per day, is still an edit war. 3RR draws a "bright line", but meeting its minimal requirements ultimately does not shield one from the consequences of edit-warring. If your edits are reverted or rejected, you can take the dispute to the
372:
A variant of returning to the same edit is returning to the same talk page to make the same arguments. On returning from a block, if you go to the talk page of the article you were penalized for, do not repeat the same arguments that led to the block. Instead, try to find different arguments,
684:. Take a long, hard look at your argument from as detached and objective a point of view as you can possibly muster, and see if there is a problem with it. If there isn't, it's best to leave the situation alone: they're not going to want to see it and you cannot force them to. If there
3869:
233:
policy. A single edit is unlikely to be a real problem, but a pattern of edits displaying an editor's bias is more likely to be an issue, and repeated biased edits of a single article or group of articles will be very unwelcome indeed. This last behavior is generally characterized as
554:, especially when multiple sources are being questioned in this manner. This may take the form of arguing about the number of or validity of the information cited by the sources. The danger here is in judging the reliability of sources by how well they support the desired viewpoint.
922:
Some editors routinely tell other editors that they disagree with to "Stay off my talk page." The editors who do this tend to have long lists of folks that have been "banned". Talk pages are the fundamental medium used for editors to interact. Except in specific and clear cases of
154:. It may also involve repeated attempts to insert or delete content in the face of the objections of several other editors, or behavior that tends to frustrate proper editorial processes and discussions. This is more than just an isolated edit or comment that was badly thought out.
785:
questions from others should not be ignored. (e. g. "You say the quote you want to incorporate can be found in this 300-page pdf, but I've looked and I can't find it. Exactly what page is it on?") Failure to cooperate with such simple requests may be interpreted as evidence of a
1909:
383:
For example: If your earlier attempts to add the phrase "Film XYZ is widely viewed as the worst film in the genre" did not lead to consensus, you may want to propose more defensible wording, like this: "While Film XYZ was widely praised by critics, critic Sue Smith of the
752:. If the sentence(s) referencing the cited work are not an accurate summary of the cited work, that the source is reliable and discusses the topic of the article, try to improve the sentences in a manner that retains the source and improves the accuracy of the statement.
273:. Problems arise when editors see their own bias as neutral, and especially when they assume that any resistance to their edits is founded in bias towards an opposing point of view. The perception that "he who is not for me is against me" is contrary to Knowledge (XXG)'s
3070:
824:
would be to place undue weight on that one author's view. It is very important to place all critical material in the proper context, and ensure that an overall balanced view is provided. A balanced view does not need to be a sympathetic view – our article on
1214:
If you regard editing as being something where you and some other editors are the "good guys", whose mission is to combat other editors who are the "bad guys", where everything is us-against-them, you may not be as much of a good guy as you think you are.
887:
of a request for comment. If someone argues at great length over a content dispute, but then suddenly gets cold feet when others suggest seeking wider input, it is often a sign that the editor recognizes that a wider consensus is unlikely to go their way.
2474:
1227:. To see one's role as being to show up at every discussion to say that your friend is right and another editor is creating a problem, before even knowing what the issues in the discussion are, just gets in the way of productive editing.
1939:
3756:
3205:
3636:
2808:
3165:
868:
there is a dispute (despite no other editors agreeing). If, no matter how many times a neutral third party intervenes, you never seem to get your way, that suggests that your goals may be at odds with
Knowledge (XXG)'s
549:
There is nothing wrong with questioning the reliability of sources, to a point. But there is a limit to how far one may reasonably go in an effort to discredit the validity of what most other contributors consider to be
2974:
2569:
4009:
2276:
3949:
3696:
3317:
1954:
4019:
3761:
1621:
4285:
4280:
3571:
4074:
2374:
4059:
3809:
2349:
635:
of other sources. A simple example of synthesis is when an editor takes cited fact A and cited fact B, and then uses these two facts to arrive at newly thought-up – and unsourced – interpretation C.
2404:
2101:
4079:
3486:
2672:
2126:
2049:
1631:
2251:
1681:
1671:
3526:
3506:
2469:
2439:
1751:
2763:
2489:
1766:
1706:
1839:
817:, other editors may revert the addition of a paragraph about the property dispute on the grounds that it places undue weight on a relatively minor aspect of the subject's personal life.
4224:
2171:
3531:
3611:
3566:
3476:
3426:
2692:
2419:
2394:
4333:
4119:
2409:
2044:
2029:
1417:
1741:
738:
that removal of statements that are pertinent, sourced reliably, and written in a neutral style constitutes disruption. Instead of removing cited work, you should be questioning
3446:
2009:
1230:
Often, the best way to make progress in a content dispute is to try to see it from both sides of the dispute, and to look for a resolution that makes use of both sides' ideas.
3601:
3516:
2632:
2484:
2389:
2004:
1964:
1819:
4229:
3322:
3235:
2833:
2574:
2399:
2324:
2059:
2034:
1959:
1571:
1530:
1339:
if done repeatedly. Rather than accuse another editor of tendentious editing, it may be wiser to point out behaviours which are contrary to
Knowledge (XXG) policies such as
3210:
3155:
3140:
1301:
countless articles which still need to be written. With a bit of time off from a contested, disputed article, you might see things from a new perspective when you return.
3656:
3606:
3461:
2753:
2091:
1974:
1854:
2893:
2271:
1288:
According to {citation of source}, the following is the case: {statement from source}. You have disputed its addition. How do you think we should express this assertion?
4189:
2818:
2564:
2301:
2226:
1796:
2873:
4084:
3736:
3581:
3501:
3170:
2919:
2848:
2702:
1999:
1083:
the righting of great wrongs, we can't actually "ride the crest of the wave" ourselves. We are, by design, supposed to be "behind the curve". This is because we only
730:
There is no rule on
Knowledge (XXG) that someone has to get permission from you before they put cited information in an article. Such a rule would clearly contradict
450:
1335:
if tendentious editing is alleged without clear evidence that the other's action meets the criteria set forth on this page, and unfounded accusations may constitute
967:
369:. Elsewhere on the internet you can get away with repeating something until nobody cares enough to contradict you anymore; on Knowledge (XXG), that is unacceptable.
365:
On returning from a block, your first action is to head right back to the article and repeat the edit. A contentious fact does not become uncontentious by virtue of
4129:
3686:
2384:
2261:
2151:
2054:
2039:
2266:
1641:
3671:
3641:
3451:
3200:
3195:
2732:
2181:
2136:
2066:
1412:
1185:
512:
to err on the side of caution. If the information you want to add is self-evidently valid and important to the subject, it should be trivial to provide multiple
4209:
2888:
980:
672:, in light of what others have said. It is true that people will only be convinced if they want to be, regardless of how good your argument may be, but that is
4387:
3984:
2429:
1804:
1518:
1461:
4069:
1786:
590:
is quite clear here: the responsibility for sourcing content rests firmly and entirely with the editor seeking to include it. This applies most especially to
3939:
3814:
1834:
453:– to accuse them of failing to do so may be regarded as uncivil, and if you are perceived as failing to assume good faith yourself, then it could be seen as
3701:
3416:
2813:
2499:
2281:
2111:
2024:
1626:
2559:
1776:
4290:
3591:
3551:
3265:
2878:
2798:
2314:
2216:
2146:
1934:
4179:
3751:
2934:
3431:
2868:
2614:
2106:
1646:
591:
505:
380:
As well, you may wish to compromise on the position you are arguing for, in the interests of proposing an idea which is more likely to get a consensus.
829:
does not portray him as a sensitive and misunderstood individual who was kind to his mother – but it does need to reflect the balance of opinion among
286:
3230:
3175:
3145:
1616:
3899:
3819:
2682:
1092:
697:
418:
unless there is genuine vandalism, that is, a deliberate attempt to degrade the encyclopedia, not a simple difference of opinion. There are numerous
1176:
If, however, the wrong that you want to address has already been sorted in the real world, and if you have the reliable sources to support it, then
4382:
4367:
4214:
4184:
3974:
3954:
3511:
3180:
3135:
3130:
2939:
2823:
2727:
2464:
2176:
2121:
2076:
2014:
1984:
1889:
1879:
1651:
3994:
3496:
2096:
1781:
4149:
4024:
3874:
3596:
3292:
3100:
2979:
2828:
2424:
2246:
2196:
1736:
992:
Most editors occasionally wonder why they're investing so much blood, sweat, and tears into
Knowledge (XXG). However, it is inappropriate to use
4164:
4104:
4029:
3521:
3491:
3411:
3240:
2211:
2201:
2166:
1979:
1884:
1606:
1432:
1292:
It may become clear that the problem is simply one of ambiguity of phrasing, or it may be that you have a hill to climb and will need to work
954:
4204:
322:
You have been blocked more than once for edit-warring. Or argue about whether you actually reverted four times or only three, or whether the
4174:
4039:
4014:
3894:
3666:
3125:
3034:
2994:
2898:
2554:
2539:
2414:
2019:
1869:
1824:
1756:
1716:
1566:
1125:
1070:
1442:
1261:
to back your edits? Are you trying to place undue weight on a certain viewpoint or issue? In addition, it may be a good idea to scrutinize
1158:
1075:
Knowledge (XXG) is a popular site, and its articles often appear high in search engine rankings. You might think that
Knowledge (XXG) is a
1058:
4316:
4144:
4124:
4049:
4044:
3616:
3105:
2748:
2657:
2519:
2454:
2364:
2354:
2329:
2291:
2286:
2221:
1989:
1949:
1894:
278:
69:
2602:
3220:
2883:
2712:
1131:
Spread the word about a theory/hypothesis/belief/cure-all herb that has been unfairly neglected or suppressed by the scholarly community
820:
Similarly, if a single author says that a particular country is a state supporter of terrorism, then adding that country to the article
414:
vandalism. Knowledge (XXG) defines vandalism very carefully to exclude good-faith contributions. Accusing other editors of vandalism is
4338:
3741:
3029:
3014:
2929:
2504:
1849:
1596:
1591:
1427:
546:
You find yourself engaging in discussions about the reliability of sources that substantially meet the criteria for reliable sources.
4134:
3944:
3914:
3879:
3706:
3185:
3095:
3009:
2652:
2622:
2494:
1676:
1181:
1170:
927:, such "banning" is highly problematic and an indication that the banning editor is having serious problems cooperating with others.
799:
735:
291:
230:
151:
1771:
1273:
but it's not acceptable to editorialise or interpret them. If only one authority says something then to include it might constitute
624:
Your citations back some of the facts you are adding, but do not explicitly support your interpretation or the inferences you draw.
4300:
4169:
3999:
3726:
3626:
3436:
3312:
3225:
3190:
3115:
3085:
2949:
2783:
2773:
2722:
2549:
2534:
2459:
2231:
2081:
1924:
1711:
1656:
1581:
1511:
1162:
628:
423:
346:
243:
277:
guideline: always allow for the possibility that you are indeed wrong, and remember that attributing motives to fellow editors is
229:
Tendentious editing is editing with a sustained editorial bias, or with a clear editorial viewpoint contrary to
Knowledge (XXG)'s
3215:
3110:
3075:
1904:
1392:
581:
4275:
4089:
4004:
3766:
3711:
3631:
3586:
3541:
3536:
3421:
3255:
3050:
2758:
2579:
2359:
2334:
2241:
2236:
2116:
1661:
1576:
1372:
4270:
3466:
3150:
4326:
4099:
3979:
3859:
3834:
3661:
3297:
3260:
3250:
2853:
2793:
2647:
1944:
1919:
1874:
1726:
1701:
1691:
1666:
1387:
419:
374:
354:
61:
31:
4219:
4034:
3919:
3844:
3731:
3651:
3621:
3471:
3090:
3060:
3024:
2914:
2778:
2697:
2479:
2344:
2309:
2156:
1914:
1864:
1859:
1586:
1407:
1382:
497:
443:
323:
274:
57:
373:
different policy rationales, and better sources. Repeating the exact arguments you made before your block may be viewed as
2642:
1829:
4377:
4321:
3909:
3904:
3864:
3849:
3839:
3716:
3561:
2969:
2959:
2858:
2667:
2529:
1814:
1686:
1422:
1277:, or it might be acceptable by agreement with other editors to state the opinion duly attributed to the named authority.
1154:
830:
551:
517:
484:
4372:
4295:
4252:
4064:
3929:
3829:
3789:
3746:
3691:
3681:
3676:
3646:
3481:
3456:
3441:
3396:
3282:
3004:
2944:
2677:
2514:
2449:
2444:
2434:
2186:
1809:
1561:
1543:
1504:
1377:
389:
239:
3969:
3924:
3287:
3160:
3120:
2924:
2662:
2191:
1636:
513:
350:
191:
1462:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar#Removal of sourced edits made in a neutral narrative is disruptive
4199:
4139:
4114:
4054:
3964:
3959:
3546:
3363:
3065:
3055:
2843:
2838:
2256:
1929:
1899:
1731:
330:
295:
821:
4159:
4109:
3889:
3884:
3854:
3343:
3307:
3302:
2999:
2803:
2637:
2161:
1994:
1969:
1844:
1397:
1274:
1021:
924:
805:
68:
This page provides additional information about concepts in the page(s) it supplements. This page is not one of
4154:
3721:
3576:
2989:
2984:
2768:
2687:
2544:
2206:
1402:
520:
which agree that it is both true and significant. Take this evidence to the talk page in the first instance.
1611:
598:
be removed immediately from both the article and the talk page, and by extension any related
Project pages.
4094:
3556:
3353:
3277:
2141:
2086:
2071:
1601:
1360:
1336:
1079:
place to set the record straight and right great wrongs, but that is absolutely not the case. While we can
265:. Few people will edit subjects in which they have no interest. Bias is not in and of itself a problem in
4194:
3804:
3373:
3348:
3327:
2707:
2339:
2131:
1696:
1166:
1096:
1017:
1005:
873:
727:
You delete the cited additions of others with the complaint that they did not discuss their edits first.
632:
404:
255:
251:
169:
73:
3368:
3358:
3272:
3245:
2509:
1761:
1437:
1328:
1310:
1239:
1197:
1136:
1066:
1062:
1033:
936:
897:
842:
761:
703:
644:
607:
563:
529:
466:
415:
150:
editing is a pattern of editing that is partisan, biased, skewed, and does not maintain an editorially
83:
157:
This essay is about how to recognise such editing, how to avoid it, and how not to be accused of it.
3824:
2788:
2627:
2524:
1721:
1284:, in an open and non-confrontational way. If an edit is rejected, try something along the lines of:
1219:
1059:
Knowledge (XXG):What
Knowledge (XXG) is not § Knowledge (XXG) is not a soapbox or means of promotion
731:
201:
997:
250:
or, if they are otherwise productive editors with a blind spot on one particular area, they may be
2964:
2954:
2863:
1527:
869:
587:
183:
366:
2717:
187:
225:, not Knowledge (XXG). If you do want to advocate for a cause, consider starting your own blog.
661:
You find yourself repeating the same argument over and over again, without persuading people.
314:
Here are some hints to help you recognise if you or someone else has become a problem editor:
3989:
3934:
3080:
3019:
2319:
1356:
1348:
1104:
1012:, especially when habitual, are a poor substitute for reasoned and collaborative discussion.
1009:
961:
Just think how much you're going to be missing. You won't have Nixon to kick around anymore.
504:
that which may be adequately explained by a simple difference of opinion. And in the case of
333:
about the precise details is unproductive and probably means that you have missed the point:
179:
165:
1258:
1352:
1340:
1332:
1224:
1024:. Such criticism can do more harm than good when the editor has been acting in good faith.
877:
864:
749:
197:
38:
1001:
501:
454:
1344:
1269:
presently involved in a dispute, so that such disputes may not arise in the first place.
1100:
860:
814:
303:
299:
175:
17:
222:
1088:
810:
4361:
3870:
Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith
742:
information. Instead of removing pertinent, referenced statements, you should remove
580:
You demand that other editors search for sources to support text that you added, or
826:
218:
147:
141:
How to recognize and avoid various problematic and disruptive patterns of editing.
1331:
and hence these accusations may not be helpful in a dispute. It can be seen as a
492:
1474:
1000:, in order to try to win in a dispute. Doing so demands an excessive amount of
388:
called it 'the poorest example of the genre in 2015'." This one at least has a
160:
Other policies, guidelines, and essays covering tendentious behaviors include:
914:
688:
a problem, however, then you should revise the argument, your case, or both.
353:. If that fails, but you still feel that you are right, consider options for
787:
743:
602:
Adding citations that are inadequate, ambiguous or not sufficiently explicit
3071:
Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack
1280:
A good way to find out what people find problematic about your edits is to
781:
No editor should ever be expected to do "homework" for another editor, but
1169:. Let reliable sources make the novel connections and statements. Finding
1481:. University of Pennsylvania; Institute for Research in Cognitive Science
1257:
should have been? Have you provided high-quality citations from reliable
290:. Articles, including their titles, must conform to policy regarding the
1157:
or published in books from reputable publishing houses. Knowledge (XXG)
778:
You ignore or refuse to answer good faith questions from other editors.
1496:
582:
you challenge them to find a source that disproves your unsourced claim
431:
756:
Ignoring or refusing to answer good faith questions from other editors
426:
to meet; the wheels of
Wikijustice may grind exceeding slow, but they
2475:
Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument
3757:
Knowledge (XXG) is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
213:
1128:
of a current or historical political, religious, or moral issue, or
594:, where uncited or poorly cited controversial or negative material
913:
212:
1940:
Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability
483:
You often find yourself accusing or suspecting other editors of "
449:
Warning others to assume good faith is something which should be
37:"WP:TE" redirects here. For the template editor user right, see
4250:
3787:
3394:
2600:
1541:
1500:
981:
Don't let the door(knob) hit you where the good Lord split you!
127:
43:
1122:
Vindicate a convicted murderer you believe to be innocent, or
3637:
Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article
2809:
Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals
2277:
Knowledge (XXG) is not being written in an organized fashion
1016:
demand and not a repeated habit, should not be dismissed as
892:"Banning" otherwise constructive editors from your talk page
668:, don't simply repeat the same ones. And most importantly,
3166:
Don't demand that editors solve the problems they identify
2975:
Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass
2570:
What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion
1910:
Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books
1622:
Editing
Knowledge (XXG) is like visiting a foreign country
794:
Assigning undue importance to a single aspect of a subject
326:(3RR) applies to a calendar day or to any 24-hour period.
125:
Explanatory essay about Knowledge (XXG):Disruptive editing
1418:
Knowledge (XXG):Notability (science)/Irrelevant arguments
800:
Knowledge (XXG):Neutral point of view § Balancing aspects
790:
effort to exasperate or waste the time of other editors.
302:
and thus be verifiable; article content must not include
4010:
How many Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb?
1180:
update the articles. Remember that you can reach out to
558:
Expecting others to find sources for your own statements
4020:
How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle
1318:
1247:
1205:
1144:
1048:
1041:
1004:
from other editors, and is never a valid rationale for
944:
905:
859:
Some editors may find that independent input through a
850:
769:
718:
711:
652:
615:
571:
537:
474:
112:
105:
98:
91:
3572:
No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
3206:
Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature
682:
You must be willing to concede you may have been wrong
3318:
There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns
1955:
Don't demolish the house while it's still being built
639:
Repeating the same argument without convincing people
3762:
Knowledge (XXG) is not the place to post your résumé
524:
Disputing the reliability of apparently good sources
4309:
4263:
3336:
3043:
2907:
2741:
2613:
2373:
2300:
1795:
1554:
1153:...you'll have to wait until it's been reported by
1107:to the balance of informed opinion. Even if you're
4281:Difference between policies, guidelines and essays
4060:Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them
1682:Not editing because of Knowledge (XXG) restriction
2252:Understanding Knowledge (XXG)'s content standards
1544:Essays on building, editing, and deleting content
1413:Knowledge (XXG):Not here to build an encyclopedia
1327:Making accusations of tendentious editing can be
2405:Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions
2350:We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions
2102:Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography
692:Deleting the pertinent cited additions of others
4080:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man
3810:Ain't no rules says a dog can't play basketball
3487:Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity
2127:Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area
1632:Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia
1119:Expose a popular artist as a child molester, or
978:
959:
3507:Extracting the meaning of significant coverage
2673:High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors
2440:Counting and sorting are not original research
4334:How to contribute to Knowledge (XXG) guidance
3950:Don't abbreviate "Knowledge (XXG)" as "Wiki"!
2470:Don't confuse stub status with non-notability
1752:The role of policies in collaborative anarchy
1512:
8:
4000:Seven Ages of Editor, by Will E. Spear-Shake
2764:An uncivil environment is a poor environment
2490:How to save an article proposed for deletion
1767:We are absolutely here to right great wrongs
1742:Ten Simple Rules for Editing Knowledge (XXG)
1707:POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields
698:Knowledge (XXG):Identifying reliable sources
3532:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability
1443:Knowledge (XXG):What Knowledge (XXG) is not
1115:before you can add it. So, if you want to:
918:This is no way to treat your fellow editor!
631:to Knowledge (XXG) expressly forbids novel
298:. Content within articles must be based on
4260:
4247:
4225:You don't have to be mad to work here, but
3797:
3784:
3612:Notability is not relevance or reliability
3567:News coverage does not decrease notability
3477:Discriminate vs indiscriminate information
3427:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
3404:
3391:
2610:
2597:
2420:Before commenting in a deletion discussion
2395:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
1551:
1538:
1519:
1505:
1497:
1192:Seeing editing as being about taking sides
318:Not learning from a block for edit-warring
304:editors' own personal opinions or theories
27:Explanatory essay about disruptive editing
4120:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you
2410:Arguments to make in deletion discussions
2030:Identifying and using independent sources
1433:Knowledge (XXG):Specialized-style fallacy
955:Knowledge (XXG):You are not irreplaceable
676:grounds for believing that your argument
4286:Don't cite essays as if they were policy
3447:Big events make key participants notable
2894:Knowledge (XXG) should not be a monopoly
2272:Knowledge (XXG) is not a reliable source
2010:Formatting bilateral relations templates
1265:your behavior this way, even if you are
1071:Knowledge (XXG):Verifiability, not truth
70:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
4388:Knowledge (XXG) essays about neutrality
3697:Solutions are mixtures and nothing else
3602:Notability is not a level playing field
3517:How the presumption of notability works
2633:Contributing to complicated discussions
2485:How the presumption of notability works
2005:Formatting bilateral relations articles
1820:Adding images improves the encyclopedia
1454:
1173:ways of presenting them is what we do.
883:Similarly, such editors may resist the
446:, no matter how often you remind them.
202:not being here to build an encyclopedia
4230:You should not write meaningless lists
3527:Historical/Policy/Notability/Arguments
2834:Staying cool when the editing gets hot
2575:When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork
2400:Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews
1965:Don't hope the house will build itself
1572:All Five Pillars are equally important
1428:Knowledge (XXG):Single-purpose account
1305:Accusing others of tendentious editing
1159:is not a publisher of original thought
1126:Explain what you are sure is the truth
252:banned from certain articles or topics
3657:One sentence does not an article make
3607:Notability is not a matter of opinion
3323:You can't squeeze blood from a turnip
3236:Don't throw your toys out of the pram
2754:A weak personal attack is still wrong
2693:Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors
2325:Don't throw more litter onto the pile
2267:Knowledge (XXG) is a work in progress
2092:Minors and persons judged incompetent
1855:An unfinished house is a real problem
1840:Alternatives to the "Expand" template
1642:External criticism of Knowledge (XXG)
487:", "censorship", or "denying facts".
7:
4210:What Knowledge (XXG) is not/Outtakes
4190:Things that should not be surprising
3885:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
3211:Don't remind others of past misdeeds
3156:Don't come down like a ton of bricks
3141:Don't call people by their real name
2889:Knowledge (XXG) is not about winning
2819:Profanity, civility, and discussions
2227:There are no shortcuts to neutrality
399:Wrongly accusing others of vandalism
180:gaming the system / abuse of process
4085:No one cares about your garage band
4070:List of jokes about Knowledge (XXG)
3737:What is and is not routine coverage
3582:No one cares about your garage band
3502:Existence does not prove notability
2920:Assume the assumption of good faith
2849:There is no Divine Right of Editors
2703:Relationships with academic editors
2565:Why was the page I created deleted?
2560:Knowledge (XXG) is not Whack-A-Mole
2000:Featured articles may have problems
1787:Knowledge (XXG) is not RationalWiki
1373:Knowledge (XXG):Advice for hotheads
987:—African-American vernacular saying
931:Threatening to quit Knowledge (XXG)
4383:Knowledge (XXG) dispute resolution
4368:Knowledge (XXG) supplemental pages
4130:Please do not murder the newcomers
3687:Reducing consensus to an algorithm
3171:Don't drink the consensus Kool-Aid
2385:Adjectives in your recommendations
2262:What an article should not include
2152:The problem with elegant variation
1960:Don't get hung up on minor details
1777:Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia
1393:Knowledge (XXG):Don't be a fanatic
1388:Knowledge (XXG):Disruptive editing
1223:personal. Comment on the content,
804:A particular problem is to assign
310:Characteristics of problem editors
261:It is important to recognize that
74:thoroughly vetted by the community
62:Knowledge (XXG):Disruptive editing
32:Knowledge (XXG):Disruptive editing
30:For the behavioral guideline, see
25:
4180:The first rule of Knowledge (XXG)
3752:Knowledge (XXG) is not Crunchbase
3452:Businesses with a single location
2733:You have a right to remain silent
2182:Restoring part of a reverted edit
2137:Potential, not just current state
2067:Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats
1408:Knowledge (XXG):Mutual withdrawal
1383:Knowledge (XXG):Civil POV pushing
1186:neutral point of view noticeboard
1095:sources, and we base articles on
592:biographies of living individuals
506:biographies of living individuals
329:3RR exists to prevent edit wars.
242:. It is usually an indication of
3201:Don't knit beside the guillotine
3196:Don't ignore community consensus
2430:Confusing arguments mean nothing
1423:Knowledge (XXG):One against many
1218:It's true that some editors are
1165:. Knowledge (XXG) doesn't lead;
664:If your arguments are rejected,
287:Knowledge (XXG) is not a soapbox
131:
47:
3702:Sources must be out-of-universe
3417:All high schools can be notable
2814:Old-fashioned Wikipedian values
2500:Identifying blatant advertising
2282:The world will not end tomorrow
2112:Not everything needs a template
2025:How to write a featured article
1627:Editors will sometimes be wrong
1378:Knowledge (XXG):Blocking policy
1234:How to pull back from the brink
837:Not accepting independent input
670:examine your argument carefully
451:done with great care, if at all
438:Asking for the benefit of doubt
174:Common tendentious behaviors –
4291:Avoid writing redundant essays
3940:Don't stuff beans up your nose
3815:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
3642:Obscurity ≠ Lack of notability
3592:Notability cannot be purchased
3552:Masking the lack of notability
2315:Copyediting reception sections
2217:Temporary versions of articles
2147:Principle of Some Astonishment
1935:Creating controversial content
1835:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
1782:Knowledge (XXG) is a community
1473:Liberman, Mark (15 Jul 2009).
1111:something is true, it must be
1:
4317:About policies and guidelines
3432:Articles with a single source
3056:Knowledge (XXG):Because I can
2879:Two wrongs don't make a right
2869:The rules of polite discourse
2799:It's not the end of the world
2107:Not everything needs a navbox
1975:Don't "teach the controversy"
1647:Here to build an encyclopedia
4205:Knowledge (XXG) is an MMORPG
3900:BOLD, revert, revert, revert
3820:Alternatives to edit warring
2683:Maintaining a friendly space
1398:Knowledge (XXG):Edit warring
1103:sources, giving appropriate
496:evidence of your failure to
420:dispute resolution processes
209:What is tendentious editing?
4185:The Five Pillars of Untruth
3975:Editing under the influence
3512:Google searches and numbers
3231:Don't template the regulars
3146:Don't call the kettle black
2940:Be excellent to one another
2824:Revert notification opt-out
2728:We are all Wikipedians here
2177:Put a little effort into it
2122:Obtain peer review comments
2077:Introduction to structurism
2015:Fruit of the poisonous tree
1985:Editors are not mindreaders
1890:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
1880:Beef up that first revision
1652:Leave it to the experienced
1617:Don't search for objections
1403:Knowledge (XXG):How to lose
4404:
4215:Why not create an account?
4150:Requirements for adminship
4025:How to vandalize correctly
3995:Five Fs of Knowledge (XXG)
3955:Don't delete the main page
3875:Avoid using preview button
3597:Notability comparison test
3181:Don't fight fire with fire
3176:Don't eat the troll's food
3136:Don't call a spade a spade
3131:Don't bludgeon the process
2980:Encourage full discussions
2829:Shadowless Fists of Death!
2465:Don't attack the nominator
2425:But there must be sources!
2247:Try not to leave it a stub
2197:Source your plot summaries
1308:
1237:
1195:
1134:
1056:
1031:
952:
934:
895:
840:
797:
759:
701:
695:
642:
627:The policy against adding
605:
561:
527:
508:, it is vitally important
464:
442:You find that nobody will
361:Repeating a penalised edit
341:revert can be disruptive.
188:disruption to make a point
81:
36:
29:
4259:
4246:
4165:Sarcasm is really helpful
4105:Notability is not eternal
4030:How to win a citation war
3800:
3796:
3783:
3492:Every snowflake is unique
3412:Advanced source searching
3407:
3403:
3390:
3293:No, you can't have a pony
3241:Do not insult the vandals
3101:Don't be high-maintenance
2658:Encouraging the newcomers
2609:
2596:
2202:Specialized-style fallacy
2167:Pruning article revisions
1995:Endorsements (commercial)
1980:Editing on mobile devices
1885:Blind men and an elephant
1860:Articles have a half-life
1607:Dissent is not disloyalty
1577:Avoid vague introductions
1550:
1537:
1475:"Last (and first) things"
822:state-sponsored terrorism
734:. There is guidance from
502:Never attribute to malice
461:Accusing others of malice
403:You repeatedly undo the "
238:and is a common cause of
4175:The Night Before Wikimas
4040:Ignore every single rule
4015:How to get away with UPE
3895:Before they were notable
3667:Overreliance upon Google
3462:Common sourcing mistakes
3035:Settle the process first
2995:Imagine others complexly
2899:Writing for the opponent
2874:There is no common sense
2555:Unopposed AFD discussion
2540:Relisting can be abusive
2415:Avoid repeated arguments
2020:Give an article a chance
1870:Avoid mission statements
1830:Advanced text formatting
1825:Advanced article editing
1772:Knowledge (XXG) in brief
1757:The rules are principles
1717:Product, process, policy
1567:Articles must be written
1438:Knowledge (XXG):Tag team
1067:Knowledge (XXG):Activist
1063:Knowledge (XXG):Advocacy
164:How content is edited –
139:This page in a nutshell:
18:Knowledge (XXG):DOORKNOB
4378:Knowledge (XXG) culture
4310:Policies and guidelines
4145:Requests for medication
4125:Please bite the newbies
4050:Mess with the templates
3617:Notability means impact
3151:Don't call things cruft
3126:Don't be the Fun Police
2935:Avoid the word "vandal"
2884:Knowledge (XXG) clichés
2749:A thank you never hurts
2520:Liar liar pants on fire
2455:Deletion is not cleanup
2365:Writing better articles
2355:Write the article first
2330:Gender-neutral language
2302:Writing article content
2292:Writing better articles
2287:Write the article first
2222:Tertiary-source fallacy
1990:Encourage the newcomers
1950:Dictionaries as sources
1895:Build content to endure
732:Knowledge (XXG):Be bold
485:suppressing information
198:single purpose accounts
4373:Knowledge (XXG) essays
4339:Policy writing is hard
4045:Is that even an essay?
3742:What notability is not
3497:Existence ≠ Notability
3106:Don't be inconsiderate
3030:Read before commenting
3015:Mind your own business
2930:Avoid personal remarks
2505:Identifying test edits
1850:A navbox on every page
1805:100K featured articles
1602:Concede lost arguments
1597:Competence is required
1528:Knowledge (XXG) essays
1290:
1225:not on the contributor
1182:a relevant WikiProject
984:
963:
919:
666:bring better arguments
588:Knowledge (XXG) policy
226:
4135:Pledge of Tranquility
3880:Avoid using wikilinks
3707:Subjective importance
3221:Don't spite your face
3010:Keep it down to earth
2774:Beware of the tigers!
2713:Too long; didn't read
2653:Edit at your own pace
2623:Accepting other users
2390:AfD is not a war zone
1737:There is no seniority
1677:Neutrality of sources
1286:
1028:Righting great wrongs
970:, as reported in the
968:Richard Nixon in 1962
917:
831:reputable authorities
475:WP:ACCUSATIONOFMALICE
410:Content disputes are
292:neutral point of view
254:or become subject to
231:neutral point of view
216:
166:neutral point of view
152:neutral point of view
4301:Quote your own essay
4170:Sausages for tasting
3945:Don't-give-a-fuckism
3915:CaPiTaLiZaTiOn MuCh?
3727:Vanispamcruftisement
3627:Notability sub-pages
3437:Avoid template creep
3397:Essays on notability
3313:There are no oracles
3096:Don't be a WikiBigot
2950:Call a spade a spade
2723:Unblock perspectives
2550:The Heymann Standard
2535:Overzealous deletion
2495:I just don't like it
2232:There is no deadline
2097:"Murder of" articles
1925:Common-style fallacy
1797:Article construction
1712:Process is important
1657:Levels of competence
1582:Be a reliable source
1087:information that is
870:policies, guidelines
430:grind (apologies to
424:there is no deadline
196:Editor intentions –
192:"I didn't hear that"
4090:No one really cares
4005:Go ahead, vandalize
3767:Two prongs of merit
3712:Third-party sources
3632:Notabilitymandering
3587:No one really cares
3542:Inherent notability
3537:Independent sources
3422:Alternative outlets
3256:Nationalist editing
3226:Don't take the bait
3191:Don't help too much
3116:Don't be prejudiced
3086:Don't be an ostrich
3051:ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI
2784:Deletion as revenge
2759:Advice for hotheads
2580:No Encyclopedic Use
2460:Does deletion help?
2360:Writing about women
2242:The deadline is now
2237:There is a deadline
2117:Nothing is in stone
1747:Tendentious editing
1662:Levels of consensus
1042:WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS
1010:Emotional outbursts
998:emotional blackmail
865:request for comment
783:simple, clarifying
572:WP:FINDSOURCESFORME
335:edit warring is bad
72:as it has not been
4100:No sorcery threats
3980:Embrace Stop Signs
3860:Assume good wraith
3835:Anti-Wikipedianism
3672:Perennial websites
3662:Other stuff exists
3298:Passive aggression
3261:No angry mastodons
3251:Hate is disruptive
3111:Don't be obnoxious
3076:Don't be a fanatic
2854:Most ideas are bad
2794:Forgive and forget
2603:Essays on civility
2212:Run an edit-a-thon
1945:Deprecated sources
1920:Citation underkill
1905:Chesterton's fence
1875:Be neutral in form
1727:Reasonability rule
1692:Oversimplification
1667:Most ideas are bad
1188:if you need help.
920:
538:WP:SOURCEGOODFAITH
390:WP:Reliable source
355:dispute resolution
263:everybody has bias
227:
4355:
4354:
4351:
4350:
4347:
4346:
4242:
4241:
4238:
4237:
4220:Yes legal threats
4035:Ignore all essays
3920:Complete bollocks
3845:Asshole John rule
3779:
3778:
3775:
3774:
3732:What BLP1E is not
3652:One hundred words
3622:Notability points
3386:
3385:
3382:
3381:
3186:Don't give a fuck
3061:Civil POV pushing
3025:Mutual withdrawal
2915:Assume good faith
2779:Civility warnings
2698:Please say please
2648:Editors' pronouns
2592:
2591:
2588:
2587:
2480:Follow the leader
2345:Use our own words
2310:Avoid thread mode
2157:Pro and con lists
1915:Citation overkill
1865:Autosizing images
1587:Civil POV pushing
1259:secondary sources
1220:simply disruptive
1163:original research
750:original research
629:original research
616:WP:INADEQUATECITE
498:assume good faith
444:assume good faith
351:cite your sources
349:, remembering to
324:three revert rule
275:assume good faith
145:
144:
123:
122:
58:explanatory essay
16:(Redirected from
4395:
4296:Finding an essay
4261:
4248:
3910:Butterfly effect
3905:Boston Tea Party
3865:Assume stupidity
3850:Assume bad faith
3840:Articlecountitis
3798:
3785:
3717:Trivial mentions
3562:Minimum coverage
3405:
3392:
3091:Don't be ashamed
2970:Discussing cruft
2960:Deny recognition
2859:Nothing is clear
2668:Expect no thanks
2611:
2598:
2530:Nothing is clear
2377:deleting content
2060:Tertiary sources
1815:Acronym overkill
1687:The one question
1552:
1539:
1532:
1521:
1514:
1507:
1498:
1491:
1490:
1488:
1486:
1470:
1464:
1459:
1355:rule. See also:
1321:
1250:
1208:
1155:reliable sources
1147:
1051:
1044:
1020:or subjected to
1018:high maintenance
988:
974:
947:
908:
853:
815:reliable sources
772:
721:
714:
655:
618:
574:
552:reliable sources
540:
518:reliable sources
477:
300:reliable sources
135:
134:
128:
115:
108:
101:
94:
51:
50:
44:
21:
4403:
4402:
4398:
4397:
4396:
4394:
4393:
4392:
4358:
4357:
4356:
4343:
4305:
4276:Value of essays
4255:
4234:
4065:Legal vandalism
3930:Counting juntas
3830:Anti-Wikipedian
3792:
3790:Humorous essays
3771:
3747:What to include
3692:Run-of-the-mill
3682:Read the source
3647:Offline sources
3442:Bare notability
3399:
3378:
3332:
3283:No Confederates
3081:Don't be a jerk
3039:
3005:Keep it concise
2945:Beyond civility
2903:
2737:
2678:How to be civil
2643:Don't retaliate
2605:
2584:
2515:Keep it concise
2450:Delete the junk
2445:Delete or merge
2435:Content removal
2369:
2335:Myth vs fiction
2296:
2187:Robotic editing
2050:Science sources
2045:Primary sources
2035:History sources
1810:Abandoned stubs
1791:
1562:Article content
1546:
1533:
1525:
1495:
1494:
1484:
1482:
1472:
1471:
1467:
1460:
1456:
1451:
1369:
1333:personal attack
1325:
1324:
1317:
1313:
1307:
1254:
1253:
1246:
1242:
1236:
1212:
1211:
1204:
1200:
1194:
1151:
1150:
1143:
1139:
1073:
1055:
1054:
1047:
1040:
1036:
1030:
1002:emotional labor
990:
986:
976:
966:—US politician
965:
957:
951:
950:
943:
939:
933:
925:WP:WIKIHOUNDING
912:
911:
904:
900:
894:
857:
856:
849:
845:
839:
802:
796:
776:
775:
768:
764:
758:
748:statements and
725:
724:
717:
710:
706:
700:
694:
659:
658:
651:
647:
641:
622:
621:
614:
610:
604:
578:
577:
570:
566:
560:
544:
543:
536:
532:
526:
481:
480:
473:
469:
463:
440:
401:
392:, which is not
363:
320:
312:
244:strong opinions
211:
132:
126:
119:
118:
111:
104:
97:
90:
86:
78:
77:
48:
42:
35:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
4401:
4399:
4391:
4390:
4385:
4380:
4375:
4370:
4360:
4359:
4353:
4352:
4349:
4348:
4345:
4344:
4342:
4341:
4336:
4331:
4330:
4329:
4324:
4313:
4311:
4307:
4306:
4304:
4303:
4298:
4293:
4288:
4283:
4278:
4273:
4267:
4265:
4257:
4256:
4251:
4244:
4243:
4240:
4239:
4236:
4235:
4233:
4232:
4227:
4222:
4217:
4212:
4207:
4202:
4197:
4192:
4187:
4182:
4177:
4172:
4167:
4162:
4157:
4152:
4147:
4142:
4137:
4132:
4127:
4122:
4117:
4112:
4107:
4102:
4097:
4092:
4087:
4082:
4077:
4072:
4067:
4062:
4057:
4052:
4047:
4042:
4037:
4032:
4027:
4022:
4017:
4012:
4007:
4002:
3997:
3992:
3987:
3982:
3977:
3972:
3970:Editsummarisis
3967:
3962:
3957:
3952:
3947:
3942:
3937:
3932:
3927:
3925:Counting forks
3922:
3917:
3912:
3907:
3902:
3897:
3892:
3887:
3882:
3877:
3872:
3867:
3862:
3857:
3852:
3847:
3842:
3837:
3832:
3827:
3822:
3817:
3812:
3807:
3801:
3794:
3793:
3788:
3781:
3780:
3777:
3776:
3773:
3772:
3770:
3769:
3764:
3759:
3754:
3749:
3744:
3739:
3734:
3729:
3724:
3719:
3714:
3709:
3704:
3699:
3694:
3689:
3684:
3679:
3674:
3669:
3664:
3659:
3654:
3649:
3644:
3639:
3634:
3629:
3624:
3619:
3614:
3609:
3604:
3599:
3594:
3589:
3584:
3579:
3574:
3569:
3564:
3559:
3554:
3549:
3544:
3539:
3534:
3529:
3524:
3519:
3514:
3509:
3504:
3499:
3494:
3489:
3484:
3482:Don't cite GNG
3479:
3474:
3469:
3464:
3459:
3457:But it's true!
3454:
3449:
3444:
3439:
3434:
3429:
3424:
3419:
3414:
3408:
3401:
3400:
3395:
3388:
3387:
3384:
3383:
3380:
3379:
3377:
3376:
3371:
3366:
3361:
3356:
3354:WikiHarassment
3351:
3346:
3340:
3338:
3334:
3333:
3331:
3330:
3325:
3320:
3315:
3310:
3305:
3300:
3295:
3290:
3288:No queerphobia
3285:
3280:
3275:
3270:
3269:
3268:
3258:
3253:
3248:
3243:
3238:
3233:
3228:
3223:
3218:
3213:
3208:
3203:
3198:
3193:
3188:
3183:
3178:
3173:
3168:
3163:
3158:
3153:
3148:
3143:
3138:
3133:
3128:
3123:
3118:
3113:
3108:
3103:
3098:
3093:
3088:
3083:
3078:
3073:
3068:
3063:
3058:
3053:
3047:
3045:
3041:
3040:
3038:
3037:
3032:
3027:
3022:
3017:
3012:
3007:
3002:
2997:
2992:
2987:
2982:
2977:
2972:
2967:
2962:
2957:
2952:
2947:
2942:
2937:
2932:
2927:
2925:Assume no clue
2922:
2917:
2911:
2909:
2905:
2904:
2902:
2901:
2896:
2891:
2886:
2881:
2876:
2871:
2866:
2861:
2856:
2851:
2846:
2841:
2836:
2831:
2826:
2821:
2816:
2811:
2806:
2801:
2796:
2791:
2786:
2781:
2776:
2771:
2766:
2761:
2756:
2751:
2745:
2743:
2739:
2738:
2736:
2735:
2730:
2725:
2720:
2715:
2710:
2705:
2700:
2695:
2690:
2685:
2680:
2675:
2670:
2665:
2663:Enjoy yourself
2660:
2655:
2650:
2645:
2640:
2635:
2630:
2625:
2619:
2617:
2607:
2606:
2601:
2594:
2593:
2590:
2589:
2586:
2585:
2583:
2582:
2577:
2572:
2567:
2562:
2557:
2552:
2547:
2542:
2537:
2532:
2527:
2522:
2517:
2512:
2507:
2502:
2497:
2492:
2487:
2482:
2477:
2472:
2467:
2462:
2457:
2452:
2447:
2442:
2437:
2432:
2427:
2422:
2417:
2412:
2407:
2402:
2397:
2392:
2387:
2381:
2379:
2376:
2371:
2370:
2368:
2367:
2362:
2357:
2352:
2347:
2342:
2337:
2332:
2327:
2322:
2317:
2312:
2306:
2304:
2298:
2297:
2295:
2294:
2289:
2284:
2279:
2274:
2269:
2264:
2259:
2254:
2249:
2244:
2239:
2234:
2229:
2224:
2219:
2214:
2209:
2204:
2199:
2194:
2192:Sham consensus
2189:
2184:
2179:
2174:
2169:
2164:
2159:
2154:
2149:
2144:
2139:
2134:
2129:
2124:
2119:
2114:
2109:
2104:
2099:
2094:
2089:
2084:
2079:
2074:
2069:
2064:
2063:
2062:
2057:
2052:
2047:
2042:
2037:
2027:
2022:
2017:
2012:
2007:
2002:
1997:
1992:
1987:
1982:
1977:
1972:
1967:
1962:
1957:
1952:
1947:
1942:
1937:
1932:
1927:
1922:
1917:
1912:
1907:
1902:
1897:
1892:
1887:
1882:
1877:
1872:
1867:
1862:
1857:
1852:
1847:
1842:
1837:
1832:
1827:
1822:
1817:
1812:
1807:
1801:
1799:
1793:
1792:
1790:
1789:
1784:
1779:
1774:
1769:
1764:
1759:
1754:
1749:
1744:
1739:
1734:
1729:
1724:
1719:
1714:
1709:
1704:
1699:
1694:
1689:
1684:
1679:
1674:
1669:
1664:
1659:
1654:
1649:
1644:
1639:
1637:Explanationism
1634:
1629:
1624:
1619:
1614:
1609:
1604:
1599:
1594:
1589:
1584:
1579:
1574:
1569:
1564:
1558:
1556:
1548:
1547:
1542:
1535:
1534:
1526:
1524:
1523:
1516:
1509:
1501:
1493:
1492:
1465:
1453:
1452:
1450:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1440:
1435:
1430:
1425:
1420:
1415:
1410:
1405:
1400:
1395:
1390:
1385:
1380:
1375:
1368:
1365:
1323:
1322:
1314:
1309:
1306:
1303:
1252:
1251:
1243:
1238:
1235:
1232:
1210:
1209:
1201:
1196:
1193:
1190:
1179:
1149:
1148:
1140:
1135:
1133:
1132:
1129:
1123:
1120:
1053:
1052:
1045:
1037:
1032:
1029:
1026:
1008:in a dispute.
996:of leaving as
977:
972:New York Times
958:
949:
948:
940:
935:
932:
929:
910:
909:
901:
896:
893:
890:
855:
854:
846:
841:
838:
835:
795:
792:
774:
773:
765:
760:
757:
754:
723:
722:
715:
707:
702:
693:
690:
657:
656:
648:
643:
640:
637:
620:
619:
611:
606:
603:
600:
576:
575:
567:
562:
559:
556:
542:
541:
533:
528:
525:
522:
479:
478:
470:
465:
462:
459:
439:
436:
400:
397:
386:New York Times
362:
359:
319:
316:
311:
308:
223:hardware store
210:
207:
206:
205:
194:
172:
143:
142:
136:
124:
121:
120:
117:
116:
113:WP:TENDENTIOUS
109:
102:
95:
87:
82:
79:
67:
66:
54:
52:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4400:
4389:
4386:
4384:
4381:
4379:
4376:
4374:
4371:
4369:
4366:
4365:
4363:
4340:
4337:
4335:
4332:
4328:
4325:
4323:
4320:
4319:
4318:
4315:
4314:
4312:
4308:
4302:
4299:
4297:
4294:
4292:
4289:
4287:
4284:
4282:
4279:
4277:
4274:
4272:
4269:
4268:
4266:
4262:
4258:
4254:
4249:
4245:
4231:
4228:
4226:
4223:
4221:
4218:
4216:
4213:
4211:
4208:
4206:
4203:
4201:
4200:Watchlistitis
4198:
4196:
4195:The WikiBible
4193:
4191:
4188:
4186:
4183:
4181:
4178:
4176:
4173:
4171:
4168:
4166:
4163:
4161:
4158:
4156:
4153:
4151:
4148:
4146:
4143:
4141:
4140:R-e-s-p-e-c-t
4138:
4136:
4133:
4131:
4128:
4126:
4123:
4121:
4118:
4116:
4115:Play the game
4113:
4111:
4108:
4106:
4103:
4101:
4098:
4096:
4093:
4091:
4088:
4086:
4083:
4081:
4078:
4076:
4073:
4071:
4068:
4066:
4063:
4061:
4058:
4056:
4055:My local pond
4053:
4051:
4048:
4046:
4043:
4041:
4038:
4036:
4033:
4031:
4028:
4026:
4023:
4021:
4018:
4016:
4013:
4011:
4008:
4006:
4003:
4001:
3998:
3996:
3993:
3991:
3988:
3986:
3983:
3981:
3978:
3976:
3973:
3971:
3968:
3966:
3965:Edits Per Day
3963:
3961:
3960:Editcountitis
3958:
3956:
3953:
3951:
3948:
3946:
3943:
3941:
3938:
3936:
3933:
3931:
3928:
3926:
3923:
3921:
3918:
3916:
3913:
3911:
3908:
3906:
3903:
3901:
3898:
3896:
3893:
3891:
3888:
3886:
3883:
3881:
3878:
3876:
3873:
3871:
3868:
3866:
3863:
3861:
3858:
3856:
3853:
3851:
3848:
3846:
3843:
3841:
3838:
3836:
3833:
3831:
3828:
3826:
3823:
3821:
3818:
3816:
3813:
3811:
3808:
3806:
3803:
3802:
3799:
3795:
3791:
3786:
3782:
3768:
3765:
3763:
3760:
3758:
3755:
3753:
3750:
3748:
3745:
3743:
3740:
3738:
3735:
3733:
3730:
3728:
3725:
3723:
3720:
3718:
3715:
3713:
3710:
3708:
3705:
3703:
3700:
3698:
3695:
3693:
3690:
3688:
3685:
3683:
3680:
3678:
3675:
3673:
3670:
3668:
3665:
3663:
3660:
3658:
3655:
3653:
3650:
3648:
3645:
3643:
3640:
3638:
3635:
3633:
3630:
3628:
3625:
3623:
3620:
3618:
3615:
3613:
3610:
3608:
3605:
3603:
3600:
3598:
3595:
3593:
3590:
3588:
3585:
3583:
3580:
3578:
3575:
3573:
3570:
3568:
3565:
3563:
3560:
3558:
3555:
3553:
3550:
3548:
3547:Insignificant
3545:
3543:
3540:
3538:
3535:
3533:
3530:
3528:
3525:
3523:
3520:
3518:
3515:
3513:
3510:
3508:
3505:
3503:
3500:
3498:
3495:
3493:
3490:
3488:
3485:
3483:
3480:
3478:
3475:
3473:
3470:
3468:
3465:
3463:
3460:
3458:
3455:
3453:
3450:
3448:
3445:
3443:
3440:
3438:
3435:
3433:
3430:
3428:
3425:
3423:
3420:
3418:
3415:
3413:
3410:
3409:
3406:
3402:
3398:
3393:
3389:
3375:
3372:
3370:
3367:
3365:
3364:WikiLawyering
3362:
3360:
3357:
3355:
3352:
3350:
3347:
3345:
3342:
3341:
3339:
3337:WikiRelations
3335:
3329:
3326:
3324:
3321:
3319:
3316:
3314:
3311:
3309:
3306:
3304:
3301:
3299:
3296:
3294:
3291:
3289:
3286:
3284:
3281:
3279:
3276:
3274:
3271:
3267:
3264:
3263:
3262:
3259:
3257:
3254:
3252:
3249:
3247:
3244:
3242:
3239:
3237:
3234:
3232:
3229:
3227:
3224:
3222:
3219:
3217:
3214:
3212:
3209:
3207:
3204:
3202:
3199:
3197:
3194:
3192:
3189:
3187:
3184:
3182:
3179:
3177:
3174:
3172:
3169:
3167:
3164:
3162:
3161:Don't cry COI
3159:
3157:
3154:
3152:
3149:
3147:
3144:
3142:
3139:
3137:
3134:
3132:
3129:
3127:
3124:
3122:
3121:Don't be rude
3119:
3117:
3114:
3112:
3109:
3107:
3104:
3102:
3099:
3097:
3094:
3092:
3089:
3087:
3084:
3082:
3079:
3077:
3074:
3072:
3069:
3067:
3066:Cyberbullying
3064:
3062:
3059:
3057:
3054:
3052:
3049:
3048:
3046:
3042:
3036:
3033:
3031:
3028:
3026:
3023:
3021:
3018:
3016:
3013:
3011:
3008:
3006:
3003:
3001:
2998:
2996:
2993:
2991:
2988:
2986:
2983:
2981:
2978:
2976:
2973:
2971:
2968:
2966:
2963:
2961:
2958:
2956:
2953:
2951:
2948:
2946:
2943:
2941:
2938:
2936:
2933:
2931:
2928:
2926:
2923:
2921:
2918:
2916:
2913:
2912:
2910:
2906:
2900:
2897:
2895:
2892:
2890:
2887:
2885:
2882:
2880:
2877:
2875:
2872:
2870:
2867:
2865:
2862:
2860:
2857:
2855:
2852:
2850:
2847:
2845:
2844:The last word
2842:
2840:
2839:The grey zone
2837:
2835:
2832:
2830:
2827:
2825:
2822:
2820:
2817:
2815:
2812:
2810:
2807:
2805:
2802:
2800:
2797:
2795:
2792:
2790:
2787:
2785:
2782:
2780:
2777:
2775:
2772:
2770:
2767:
2765:
2762:
2760:
2757:
2755:
2752:
2750:
2747:
2746:
2744:
2740:
2734:
2731:
2729:
2726:
2724:
2721:
2719:
2716:
2714:
2711:
2709:
2706:
2704:
2701:
2699:
2696:
2694:
2691:
2689:
2686:
2684:
2681:
2679:
2676:
2674:
2671:
2669:
2666:
2664:
2661:
2659:
2656:
2654:
2651:
2649:
2646:
2644:
2641:
2639:
2636:
2634:
2631:
2629:
2626:
2624:
2621:
2620:
2618:
2616:
2612:
2608:
2604:
2599:
2595:
2581:
2578:
2576:
2573:
2571:
2568:
2566:
2563:
2561:
2558:
2556:
2553:
2551:
2548:
2546:
2543:
2541:
2538:
2536:
2533:
2531:
2528:
2526:
2523:
2521:
2518:
2516:
2513:
2511:
2508:
2506:
2503:
2501:
2498:
2496:
2493:
2491:
2488:
2486:
2483:
2481:
2478:
2476:
2473:
2471:
2468:
2466:
2463:
2461:
2458:
2456:
2453:
2451:
2448:
2446:
2443:
2441:
2438:
2436:
2433:
2431:
2428:
2426:
2423:
2421:
2418:
2416:
2413:
2411:
2408:
2406:
2403:
2401:
2398:
2396:
2393:
2391:
2388:
2386:
2383:
2382:
2380:
2378:
2372:
2366:
2363:
2361:
2358:
2356:
2353:
2351:
2348:
2346:
2343:
2341:
2338:
2336:
2333:
2331:
2328:
2326:
2323:
2321:
2318:
2316:
2313:
2311:
2308:
2307:
2305:
2303:
2299:
2293:
2290:
2288:
2285:
2283:
2280:
2278:
2275:
2273:
2270:
2268:
2265:
2263:
2260:
2258:
2257:Walled garden
2255:
2253:
2250:
2248:
2245:
2243:
2240:
2238:
2235:
2233:
2230:
2228:
2225:
2223:
2220:
2218:
2215:
2213:
2210:
2208:
2205:
2203:
2200:
2198:
2195:
2193:
2190:
2188:
2185:
2183:
2180:
2178:
2175:
2173:
2170:
2168:
2165:
2163:
2160:
2158:
2155:
2153:
2150:
2148:
2145:
2143:
2140:
2138:
2135:
2133:
2130:
2128:
2125:
2123:
2120:
2118:
2115:
2113:
2110:
2108:
2105:
2103:
2100:
2098:
2095:
2093:
2090:
2088:
2085:
2083:
2082:Mine a source
2080:
2078:
2075:
2073:
2070:
2068:
2065:
2061:
2058:
2056:
2053:
2051:
2048:
2046:
2043:
2041:
2038:
2036:
2033:
2032:
2031:
2028:
2026:
2023:
2021:
2018:
2016:
2013:
2011:
2008:
2006:
2003:
2001:
1998:
1996:
1993:
1991:
1988:
1986:
1983:
1981:
1978:
1976:
1973:
1971:
1968:
1966:
1963:
1961:
1958:
1956:
1953:
1951:
1948:
1946:
1943:
1941:
1938:
1936:
1933:
1931:
1930:Concept cloud
1928:
1926:
1923:
1921:
1918:
1916:
1913:
1911:
1908:
1906:
1903:
1901:
1900:Cherrypicking
1898:
1896:
1893:
1891:
1888:
1886:
1883:
1881:
1878:
1876:
1873:
1871:
1868:
1866:
1863:
1861:
1858:
1856:
1853:
1851:
1848:
1846:
1843:
1841:
1838:
1836:
1833:
1831:
1828:
1826:
1823:
1821:
1818:
1816:
1813:
1811:
1808:
1806:
1803:
1802:
1800:
1798:
1794:
1788:
1785:
1783:
1780:
1778:
1775:
1773:
1770:
1768:
1765:
1763:
1760:
1758:
1755:
1753:
1750:
1748:
1745:
1743:
1740:
1738:
1735:
1733:
1732:Systemic bias
1730:
1728:
1725:
1723:
1720:
1718:
1715:
1713:
1710:
1708:
1705:
1703:
1700:
1698:
1695:
1693:
1690:
1688:
1685:
1683:
1680:
1678:
1675:
1673:
1670:
1668:
1665:
1663:
1660:
1658:
1655:
1653:
1650:
1648:
1645:
1643:
1640:
1638:
1635:
1633:
1630:
1628:
1625:
1623:
1620:
1618:
1615:
1613:
1610:
1608:
1605:
1603:
1600:
1598:
1595:
1593:
1590:
1588:
1585:
1583:
1580:
1578:
1575:
1573:
1570:
1568:
1565:
1563:
1560:
1559:
1557:
1553:
1549:
1545:
1540:
1536:
1529:
1522:
1517:
1515:
1510:
1508:
1503:
1502:
1499:
1480:
1476:
1469:
1466:
1463:
1458:
1455:
1448:
1444:
1441:
1439:
1436:
1434:
1431:
1429:
1426:
1424:
1421:
1419:
1416:
1414:
1411:
1409:
1406:
1404:
1401:
1399:
1396:
1394:
1391:
1389:
1386:
1384:
1381:
1379:
1376:
1374:
1371:
1370:
1366:
1364:
1362:
1361:WP:ASPERSIONS
1358:
1354:
1350:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1320:
1316:
1315:
1312:
1304:
1302:
1298:
1295:
1289:
1285:
1283:
1278:
1276:
1270:
1268:
1264:
1260:
1249:
1245:
1244:
1241:
1233:
1231:
1228:
1226:
1221:
1216:
1207:
1203:
1202:
1199:
1191:
1189:
1187:
1183:
1177:
1174:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1146:
1142:
1141:
1138:
1130:
1127:
1124:
1121:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1050:
1046:
1043:
1039:
1038:
1035:
1027:
1025:
1023:
1019:
1013:
1011:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
989:
983:
982:
975:
973:
969:
962:
956:
946:
942:
941:
938:
930:
928:
926:
916:
907:
903:
902:
899:
891:
889:
886:
881:
879:
875:
871:
866:
862:
861:third opinion
852:
848:
847:
844:
836:
834:
832:
828:
823:
818:
816:
812:
807:
801:
793:
791:
789:
784:
779:
771:
767:
766:
763:
755:
753:
751:
747:
746:
741:
737:
733:
728:
720:
719:WP:REFREMOVAL
716:
713:
712:WP:REMOVECITE
709:
708:
705:
699:
691:
689:
687:
683:
679:
675:
671:
667:
662:
654:
650:
649:
646:
638:
636:
634:
630:
625:
617:
613:
612:
609:
601:
599:
597:
593:
589:
585:
583:
573:
569:
568:
565:
557:
555:
553:
547:
539:
535:
534:
531:
523:
521:
519:
515:
511:
507:
503:
499:
495:
494:
488:
486:
476:
472:
471:
468:
460:
458:
456:
452:
447:
445:
437:
435:
433:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
408:
407:" of others.
406:
398:
396:
395:
391:
387:
381:
378:
376:
370:
368:
360:
358:
356:
352:
348:
342:
340:
336:
332:
331:Wikilawyering
327:
325:
317:
315:
309:
307:
305:
301:
297:
296:verifiability
293:
289:
288:
282:
280:
279:inconsiderate
276:
272:
268:
264:
259:
257:
253:
247:
245:
241:
237:
232:
224:
220:
215:
208:
203:
199:
195:
193:
189:
185:
184:wikilawyering
181:
177:
173:
171:
167:
163:
162:
161:
158:
155:
153:
149:
140:
137:
130:
129:
114:
110:
107:
103:
100:
96:
93:
89:
88:
85:
80:
75:
71:
64:
63:
59:
53:
46:
45:
40:
33:
19:
4264:About essays
4253:About essays
4160:Rouge editor
4110:Oops Defense
3890:Barnstaritis
3855:Assume faith
3677:Pokémon test
3522:High Schools
3344:WikiBullying
3308:Superhatting
3303:POV railroad
3000:Just drop it
2804:Nobody cares
2638:Divisiveness
2162:Printability
2055:Style guides
1845:Amnesia test
1746:
1702:Paraphrasing
1483:. Retrieved
1479:Language Log
1478:
1468:
1457:
1329:inflammatory
1326:
1299:
1293:
1291:
1287:
1281:
1279:
1275:undue weight
1271:
1266:
1262:
1255:
1229:
1217:
1213:
1175:
1152:
1112:
1108:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1074:
1022:gravedancing
1014:
993:
991:
985:
979:
971:
964:
960:
921:
884:
882:
858:
827:Adolf Hitler
819:
806:undue weight
803:
782:
780:
777:
770:WP:IGNOREYOU
744:
739:
729:
726:
685:
681:
677:
673:
669:
665:
663:
660:
626:
623:
595:
586:
579:
548:
545:
509:
491:
489:
482:
455:being a jerk
448:
441:
427:
411:
409:
402:
393:
385:
382:
379:
371:
364:
343:
338:
334:
328:
321:
313:
285:
283:
270:
266:
262:
260:
248:
235:
228:
176:edit warring
159:
156:
146:
138:
55:
4271:Essay guide
4155:Rouge admin
3722:Video links
3577:No big loss
3266:just madmen
3216:Don't shout
2990:How to lose
2985:Get over it
2769:Be the glue
2688:Negotiation
2545:Relist bias
2375:Removing or
2207:Stub Makers
2040:Law sources
1970:Don't panic
1101:independent
945:WP:DOORKNOB
493:prima facie
337:, and even
236:POV pushing
219:ax to grind
148:Tendentious
106:WP:TIMESINK
56:This is an
4362:Categories
4327:Guidelines
4095:No, really
4075:LTTAUTMAOK
3557:Make stubs
3278:No racists
3020:Say "MOBY"
2742:Philosophy
2615:The basics
2172:Publicists
2142:Presentism
2087:Merge Test
2072:Inaccuracy
1555:Philosophy
1485:13 October
1449:References
1351:, and the
1337:harassment
1145:WP:NOTLEAD
1113:verifiable
1089:verifiable
1057:See also:
953:See also:
885:initiation
811:verifiable
798:See also:
696:See also:
375:disruptive
367:repetition
345:article's
284:Remember:
269:, only in
221:? Try the
3805:Adminitis
3374:WikiPeace
3349:WikiCrime
3328:UPPERCASE
2708:Thank you
2340:Proseline
2132:Permastub
1697:Paradoxes
1612:Don't lie
1206:WP:USTHEM
1178:please do
1167:we follow
1097:secondary
1034:Shortcuts
1006:consensus
874:community
788:bad faith
745:off-topic
704:Shortcuts
680:be true.
653:WP:REHASH
633:syntheses
514:citations
405:vandalism
347:talk page
256:probation
170:consensus
84:Shortcuts
4322:Policies
3472:Coatrack
3369:WikiLove
3359:WikiHate
3273:No Nazis
3246:Griefing
2510:Immunity
1762:Trifecta
1592:Cohesion
1367:See also
1311:Shortcut
1248:WP:BRINK
1240:Shortcut
1198:Shortcut
1137:Shortcut
1093:reliable
937:Shortcut
906:WP:SOMTP
898:Shortcut
851:WP:NORFC
843:Shortcut
762:Shortcut
645:Shortcut
608:Shortcut
564:Shortcut
530:Shortcut
490:This is
467:Shortcut
271:articles
240:blocking
3985:Emerson
3825:ANI flu
2789:Failure
2628:Apology
2525:Nothing
1722:Purpose
1357:WP:AOHA
1349:WP:NPOV
1319:WP:AOTE
1184:or the
1171:neutral
994:threats
878:purpose
740:uncited
432:Sun Tzu
416:uncivil
267:editors
217:Got an
99:WP:TEND
3467:Clones
3044:Don'ts
2965:Desist
2955:Candor
2864:Reader
1341:WP:NOR
1105:weight
1091:using
1085:report
1081:record
1069:; and
1049:WP:RGW
736:ArbCom
510:always
60:about
39:WP:TPE
2718:Truce
1345:WP:RS
1077:great
516:from
92:WP:TE
3990:Fart
3935:Crap
2320:Coup
1672:Need
1487:2023
1359:and
1294:with
1109:sure
1099:and
876:and
678:must
596:must
422:and
394:you.
294:and
2908:Dos
1531:(?)
1353:3RR
1282:ask
1267:not
1263:all
1161:or
863:or
813:in
674:not
434:).
412:not
339:one
4364::
1477:.
1363:.
1347:,
1343:,
1065:;
1061:;
880:.
872:,
833:.
686:is
584:.
500:.
457:.
428:do
377:.
357:.
306:.
281:.
258:.
246:.
200:,
190:,
186:,
182:,
178:,
168:,
65:.
1520:e
1513:t
1506:v
1489:.
204:.
76:.
41:.
34:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
