Knowledge

:Good article reassessment/Sister Wives/1 - Knowledge

Source 📝

534: 355: 267: 245: 186: 164: 509: 476: 423: 377: 319: 399: 297: 640:
The lead needs fixing. The second paragraph is totally unsourced and doesn't appear anywhere in the body. The first paragraph doesn't appear in the body either, although there is a source. The lead simultaneously needs expansion to summarize the body, it doesn't touch on most sections.
623:"As polygamous marriage is not legally recognized in the US, there are no divorce documents to date the end of relationships. The end of a relationship is instead reckoned by announcements, and events such as moving away." 370:
for a television series of 10 years and 17 seasons, the article is short - it seems to lack both breadth and depth of coverage (I have never watched the show, thus my use of the verb "seems")
287:, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). 284: 173: 211: 620:
The article isn't that bad, at least from an initial viewing. Maybe it's not broad enough but I don't have enough knowledge to tell. though I would like for
493: 215: 207: 199: 80: 17: 522: 76: 203: 61: 409: 141: 328: 306: 39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
664:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
485: 53: 611: 590: 117: 179:
see several pertinent edits I made in the lead section and elsewhere on 5 December 2022‎ between 06:38 and 08:27 (UTC)
497: 276: 280: 195: 650: 635: 615: 594: 573: 128: 646: 607: 586: 582:, apart from the trivial divorce section, I honestly don't see anything that unforgivable with the article. 489: 386: 230: 631: 436: 364: 569: 101: 332: 642: 603: 518: 627: 599: 253:. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with 69: 579: 566: 462: 458: 113: 677: 466: 413:: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. 254: 671: 561: 46: 122: 416:
Maybe - I tried to remove opinions, but I could have easily missed something
560:
I used the table above to explain my reasoning for listing this article for
385:. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see 312:
I removed some original research, but the article might contain even more
435:: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing 260:
see edits I made (see 1a, above) for examples of unreliable sources
96: 88: 57: 549:not even close to satisfying Good Article criteria 174:understandable to an appropriately broad audience 8: 134: 564:. Please discuss here. Many thanks - 7: 176:; spelling and grammar are correct. 35:The following discussion is closed. 562:good article community reassessment 172:. the prose is clear, concise, and 18:Knowledge:Good article reassessment 398: 296: 24: 660:The discussion above is closed. 532: 507: 474: 421: 397: 375: 353: 317: 295: 265: 243: 184: 162: 626:To be cited before I say keep. 97:Watch article reassessment page 442:I didn't notice any edit wars 285:could reasonably be challenged 1: 494:valid non-free use rationales 651:14:31, 13 January 2023 (UTC) 636:03:18, 12 January 2023 (UTC) 616:22:48, 11 January 2023 (UTC) 574:09:13, 5 December 2022 (UTC) 533: 508: 475: 422: 376: 354: 318: 266: 244: 185: 163: 129:04:07, 16 January 2023 (UTC) 595:23:24, 8 January 2023 (UTC) 694: 255:the layout style guideline 446: 341: 225: 150: 140: 662:Please do not modify it. 137: 37:Please do not modify it. 521:to the topic, and have 194:. it complies with the 608:~~ AirshipJungleman29 587:~~ AirshipJungleman29 346:Broad in its coverage 439:or content dispute. 329:copyright violations 307:no original research 236:no original research 567:Mark D Worthen PsyD 363:. it addresses the 283:. All content that 221:same as above (1a) 544:Overall assessment 490:copyright statuses 453:, if possible, by 216:list incorporation 102:Most recent review 38: 553: 552: 523:suitable captions 496:are provided for 327:. it contains no 36: 685: 606:, any thoughts? 572: 536: 535: 511: 510: 498:non-free content 478: 477: 425: 424: 401: 400: 379: 378: 357: 356: 321: 320: 299: 298: 277:reliable sources 269: 268: 247: 246: 188: 187: 166: 165: 135: 125: 111: 99: 93: 84: 65: 693: 692: 688: 687: 686: 684: 683: 682: 668: 667: 666: 665: 565: 558: 198:guidelines for 196:Manual of Style 146:Review Comment 123: 106: 95: 74: 51: 45: 41: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 691: 689: 681: 680: 670: 669: 659: 658: 657: 656: 655: 654: 653: 638: 624: 621: 557: 554: 551: 550: 547: 537: 529: 528: 526: 512: 504: 503: 501: 479: 471: 470: 444: 443: 440: 426: 418: 417: 414: 402: 394: 393: 390: 380: 372: 371: 368: 367:of the topic. 358: 350: 349: 339: 338: 336: 322: 314: 313: 310: 305:. it contains 300: 292: 291: 290:same as above 288: 270: 262: 261: 258: 248: 240: 239: 223: 222: 219: 208:words to watch 189: 181: 180: 177: 167: 159: 158: 148: 147: 144: 139: 133: 132: 131: 104: 42: 33: 32: 30: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 690: 679: 676: 675: 673: 663: 652: 648: 644: 639: 637: 633: 629: 625: 622: 619: 618: 617: 613: 609: 605: 604:Chipmunkdavis 601: 598: 597: 596: 592: 588: 585: 581: 578: 577: 576: 575: 571: 568: 563: 555: 548: 545: 541: 538: 531: 530: 527: 524: 520: 516: 513: 506: 505: 502: 499: 495: 491: 487: 483: 480: 473: 472: 468: 464: 460: 456: 452: 449: 445: 441: 438: 434: 430: 427: 420: 419: 415: 412: 411: 406: 403: 396: 395: 391: 388: 387:summary style 384: 381: 374: 373: 369: 366: 362: 359: 352: 351: 347: 344: 340: 337: 334: 330: 326: 323: 316: 315: 311: 308: 304: 301: 294: 293: 289: 286: 282: 278: 274: 271: 264: 263: 259: 256: 252: 249: 242: 241: 237: 233: 232: 228: 224: 220: 217: 213: 209: 205: 201: 200:lead sections 197: 193: 190: 183: 182: 178: 175: 171: 168: 161: 160: 156: 153: 149: 145: 143: 136: 130: 127: 126: 119: 115: 109: 105: 103: 98: 92: 91: 87: 82: 78: 73: 72: 68: 63: 59: 55: 50: 49: 44: 43: 40: 29: 26: 19: 661: 628:Onegreatjoke 600:Onegreatjoke 583: 559: 543: 539: 517:. media are 514: 484:. media are 481: 454: 450: 447: 432: 428: 408: 404: 382: 365:main aspects 360: 345: 342: 324: 302: 281:cited inline 272: 250: 235: 229: 226: 191: 169: 155:Well-written 154: 151: 121: 107: 89: 85: 71:Article talk 70: 66: 47: 34: 28:Sister Wives 27: 580:Markworthen 488:with their 451:Illustrated 110:: Delisted. 58:visual edit 556:Discussion 333:plagiarism 231:Verifiable 392:I guess. 142:Attribute 672:Category 519:relevant 457:such as 437:edit war 410:Neutral 212:fiction 81:history 62:history 48:Article 678:GAR/68 570:(talk) 492:, and 486:tagged 459:images 433:Stable 214:, and 204:layout 124:buidhe 108:Result 467:audio 465:, or 463:video 455:media 234:with 138:Rate 90:Watch 16:< 647:talk 632:talk 612:talk 591:talk 584:Keep 279:are 77:edit 54:edit 643:CMD 389:). 331:or 674:: 649:) 634:) 614:) 602:, 593:) 546:. 542:. 525:. 515:6b 500:. 482:6a 469:: 461:, 448:6. 431:. 407:. 383:3b 361:3a 348:: 343:3. 335:. 325:2d 309:. 303:2c 275:. 273:2b 257:. 251:2a 238:: 227:2. 218:. 210:, 206:, 202:, 192:1b 170:1a 157:: 152:1. 120:) 116:· 100:• 94:• 79:| 60:| 56:| 645:( 630:( 610:( 589:( 540:7 429:5 405:4 118:c 114:t 112:( 86:· 83:) 75:( 67:· 64:) 52:(

Index

Knowledge:Good article reassessment
Sister Wives
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Watch article reassessment page
Most recent review
t
c
buidhe
04:07, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Attribute
understandable to an appropriately broad audience
Manual of Style
lead sections
layout
words to watch
fiction
list incorporation
Verifiable
the layout style guideline
reliable sources
cited inline
could reasonably be challenged
no original research

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.