Knowledge

:Identifying reliable sources (history) - Knowledge

Source đź“ť

536:) fact. In these circumstances, it may be legitimate to use the primary source noted, or an equivalent primary source, to illustrate the fact. First demonstrate the fact to the reader, citing the scholarly reliable source, then provide an attributed quote from the primary source in a break-out box or blockquote. For example, "According to Scholar, Jane ran down the road with a vigor that surprised her community (Scholar, 1990). Scholar quotes Quimby, the mayor of Imaginary Town, who stated: "This was the most earnest running seen in a long time; never was such road running seen in Imaginary Town" (Quimby, as quoted in Scholar, 1990)." The primary source is not used to prove the fact, but to illustrate the proof of the fact with the unique voice of that era. 209:, who read and critique each other's work. Material submitted for scholarly publication is vetted by editors and outside advisers. Scholarly books typically have a page or more of acknowledgments naming the people who assisted in finding, and evaluating sources, and helping the author avoid mistakes. Editors give a high priority to ensuring that the authors have dealt with the current standard scholarly historiography on the topic. A submitted paper or manuscript that is unaware of major relevant scholarship will be sent back for revision, or rejected. Scholarly books are reviewed in the history journals, with the goal of evaluating the originality and contribution, and pointing out misinterpretations or mistakes. 35: 447:
Most academic papers have a thesis — the point of the paper; not all theses are correct, or even survive to become significant points of view. If a paper argues hotly for a thesis, and no later source accepts or mentions it, it may be best to take at most the supporting facts and leave the case being
325:
Historians produce material after the fact. Recent scholarship is scholarship which displays the currently acceptable methodological practices, and that refers to other recent material. This constitutes a shifting window of "recentness" that depends on the area of historical studies, and changes in
486:
Using multiple scholarly works and considering how all recent works of scholarship portray the encyclopaedic subject is important. Different scholars will draw attention to different features of the past, even when they agree on weight or causation. Similarly, different scholars may have different
474:
The most desirable source for an individual claim is the scholarly work that gives weight to discussing the claim in the first place. Works of historical scholarship usually both historicise and provide a narrative. By historicising a topic, the scholar makes the claim weighty to the discussion of
505:
This is perhaps the area requiring the most judgement on the part of an editor, and such sources should generally be used to add encyclopaedic colour to events or to expand on areas which scholars considered important but do not discuss at depth. Often this problem can come about because subjects
266:
be scholarly. The more libraries holding the work, the greater the implication that the work is held by academic libraries for its scholarly value; rather than as an example of popular opinion or fallacious scholarship. Correspondingly, when works are held primarily or only in popular or deposit
174:
Historians carry out original research, often using primary sources. Historians often have a PhD or advanced academic training in historiography, but may have an advanced degree in a related social science field or a domain specific field; other scholars and reliable sources will typically use the
165:
Scholarly historians ensure their work is worthy through a disciplinary practice called historiography. This may include methodology, jargon and theory. An article on such scholarly discipline is a history article, but, may also be relevant to other scholarly fields or knowledge communities. For
435:
Surveying these documents should provide you with an understanding of the current scholarly consensus, or the multiple scholarly consensuses held. Views lying outside of these discussions should be considered as non-scholarly opinions and weighted as such; they should generally be relegated to
161:
Articles that deal with current events, or events occurring entirely in the previous one or two years are not regarded as historical articles, since they have not been studied by historians. When historians first begin to write about an event, then it should be regarded as a historical article.
475:
the history. By narrativising a topic, the historian demonstrates their history and narrative through close reference to events and analysis. If a scholar has attached particular weight to an incident, then this section of their work is an appropriate place to locate specific claims, such as
3019: 1059: 2220: 564:
This essay doesn't mean to imply that reliable non-scholarly sources are inappropriate or insufficient just because scholarly sources are available or potentially available. Finding and using scholarly sources is a best practice, not a requirement.
506:
that are encyclopaedically notable are not the focus of the best scholarly works on a topic. A major event may be discussed primarily for its contributions to other phenomena; a battle may be mentioned frequently in passing, but nowhere in detail.
1624: 1089: 497:
Is there a literature in trade, popular or hobbyist history that is of a high quality regarding fact checking, but of a non-scholarly quality regarding methodology or historiography, that could be used to supplement the scholarly
329:
The main driver for new ideas is the opening of new primary sources, such as archives. Also new historiographical models come into use. They are usually added to old models, but sometimes older models are rejected or abandoned.
2355: 2906: 229:
Other works that are recognised as scholarship by other historians (by review or discussion), which were reviewed or edited by a scholarly press or committee. This includes unpublished papers read at scholarly conferences.
443:
that the fringe views are not a central item of historiographical debate, the fringe content should be relegated to its own article entirely, discussing the dismissal of the views as fringe views by the scholarly public.
2786: 1958: 2315: 2124: 1719: 255:
Publications by non-academic historians in popular modes, demonstrated as accepted by the general scholarly community by repeated reviews over time of that non-academic historian's work in scholarly peer-reviewed
3159: 579: 219:
Chapters in books published by academic and scholarly presses by or edited by historians, as reviewed in scholarly historical journals or as demonstrated by past works of a similar nature by the historian or
2467: 1104: 3169: 3435: 3430: 2721: 1426: 3099: 2846: 2911: 771: 3224: 1524: 3209: 2959: 1499: 1554: 1251: 3229: 2636: 1822: 1276: 1199: 781: 532:
A fact qualifies for illustration when a major scholarly text explicitly demonstrates a point by reference to a primary source, or quotes a primary source in demonstration of a major (as
2676: 2656: 1619: 1589: 901: 1913: 1639: 1401: 916: 856: 831: 821: 989: 216:
Books published by academic and scholarly presses by historians, as reviewed in scholarly historical journals or as demonstrated by past works of a similar nature by the historian.
3374: 1321: 2681: 2761: 2716: 2626: 2576: 1842: 1569: 1544: 501:
Would a very high quality primary source, such as a newspaper article from a broadsheet newspaper of the time supplement the scholarly accounts, allowing encyclopaedic clarity?
3269: 1559: 1194: 1179: 680: 2596: 1159: 483:
In general, however, causation is a more contested issue among historians and other scholars and particular attention should be paid to the historiography around causes.
3483: 2751: 2666: 1782: 1634: 1539: 1154: 1114: 969: 479:
If a scholar has paid attention to a debate about causation or causal structures, then this section of the work is the appropriate place to locate specific claims about
326:
historical scholarship. The only way to judge this is by becoming aware of the higher order debates within a field of history, this can be done by reading the reviews.
3379: 2472: 2385: 1983: 1724: 1549: 1474: 1209: 1109: 891: 721: 556:
Finally, the use of primary sources should be considered in terms of the policy regarding the use of images. There should not be too many, and they are not required.
2360: 2305: 2290: 2806: 2756: 2611: 1903: 1241: 1124: 1004: 3339: 1968: 1714: 1451: 1376: 946: 252:
Popular publications by non-historians that were reviewed favourably in explicit book reviews or review-articles by historians in scholarly peer-reviewed journals
2023: 285:
Popular works that were not reviewed, especially works by journalists, or memoirs—these may be useful to supplement an article that relies upon scholarly sources
3234: 2886: 2731: 2651: 2320: 2069: 1998: 1852: 1149: 395:
In many historical topics, scholarship is divided, so several scholarly positions should be relied upon. Some people masquerading as scholars actually present
3279: 2836: 2043: 1534: 1421: 1411: 1301: 1204: 1189: 587: 2821: 2791: 2601: 2350: 2345: 1882: 1331: 1286: 1216: 412:
Similarly conference papers that were peer reviewed in full before publication that are field reviews or have as their central argument the historiography
3134: 1579: 954: 668: 3089: 2964: 984: 3522: 2851: 2566: 1963: 1649: 1431: 1416: 1261: 1174: 791: 776: 259:
Publications by any of the above in politically sectarian presses, where such works have been reviewed favourably in scholarly peer-reviewed journals
3440: 3359: 2741: 2701: 2415: 2038: 2028: 1948: 1464: 1366: 1296: 1084: 2084: 3219: 2581: 2018: 1764: 1256: 936: 796: 490:
Where scholarship draws particular attention to an incident, but individual claims of encyclopaedic interest are missing editors should consider:
2380: 2325: 2295: 766: 3049: 2969: 1832: 1709: 926: 162:
Sources that were previously satisfactory, such as reports in the mainstream press, should be replaced by sources from historical scholarship.
3364: 3334: 3329: 3124: 3104: 2901: 2661: 2330: 2285: 2280: 2089: 1973: 1877: 1614: 1326: 1271: 1226: 1164: 1134: 1039: 1029: 801: 635: 2646: 1246: 3299: 3174: 3024: 2746: 2442: 2250: 2129: 1978: 1574: 1396: 1346: 886: 3314: 3254: 3179: 2671: 2641: 2561: 2390: 1361: 1351: 1316: 1129: 1034: 756: 574: 3324: 3189: 3164: 3144: 3044: 2816: 2275: 2184: 2144: 2048: 1704: 1689: 1564: 1169: 1019: 974: 931: 906: 866: 716: 106: 50:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Knowledge contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
3466: 3294: 3274: 3199: 3194: 2766: 2255: 1898: 1807: 1669: 1604: 1514: 1504: 1479: 1441: 1436: 1371: 1139: 1099: 1044: 51: 1752: 2370: 1862: 3488: 3354: 2891: 2179: 2164: 2079: 1654: 999: 746: 741: 3284: 3094: 3064: 3029: 2856: 2335: 2245: 2159: 1802: 1772: 1644: 826: 350: 102: 3450: 3319: 3149: 2876: 2776: 2586: 2462: 2375: 2340: 2265: 2235: 2099: 1933: 1923: 1872: 1699: 1684: 1609: 1381: 1231: 1074: 861: 806: 731: 661: 226:
Books, book chapters and articles by social scientists and scholars in the humanities, working within their area of expertise
98: 2033: 2365: 2260: 2225: 1054: 267:
libraries this may indicate that the work has not been judged by professional librarians to be a reliable secondary source.
3425: 3239: 3154: 2916: 2861: 2781: 2736: 2691: 2686: 2571: 2405: 2200: 1908: 1729: 1509: 1484: 1391: 1386: 1266: 979: 896: 811: 726: 292:
rules. This includes primary source collections, or the primary source sections or appendixes of otherwise scholarly texts
110: 2300: 3476: 3249: 3129: 3009: 2984: 2811: 2447: 2410: 2400: 2003: 1943: 1797: 1094: 1069: 1024: 921: 876: 851: 841: 816: 3369: 3184: 3069: 2994: 2881: 2801: 2771: 2621: 2240: 2210: 2174: 2064: 1928: 1847: 1629: 1494: 1459: 1306: 1064: 1014: 1009: 736: 1792: 3471: 3420: 3059: 3054: 3014: 2999: 2989: 2866: 2711: 2616: 2119: 2109: 2008: 1817: 1679: 964: 836: 3517: 3445: 3402: 3214: 3079: 2979: 2939: 2896: 2841: 2831: 2826: 2796: 2631: 2606: 2591: 2546: 2432: 2154: 2094: 1827: 1664: 1599: 1594: 1584: 1336: 959: 711: 693: 654: 249:
Publications like the above, reviewed to scholarly standards by historians, that were authored by non-historians
3119: 3074: 2437: 2310: 2270: 2074: 1812: 1341: 786: 353:, scholars began to gain access to the archives of former communist countries, which offered new perspectives. 539:
This ensures that your use of the primary source is not original research or original research by synthesis:
233:
These works could include signed articles in encyclopaedia that are aimed at a scholarly public of historians
3349: 3289: 3264: 3204: 3114: 3109: 2696: 2513: 2215: 2205: 1993: 1988: 1406: 1079: 1049: 881: 94: 3309: 3259: 3039: 3034: 3004: 2493: 2457: 2452: 2149: 1953: 1787: 1311: 1144: 1119: 994: 335: 334:
For example, scholarship before 1990 will not include post-modern or narrativist methodologies. See also
3304: 2871: 2726: 2139: 2134: 1918: 1837: 1694: 1356: 624: 424:
Introductions to major scholarly works on the topic or introductions to edited collections of chapters
761: 129:
Where scholarly works are unavailable, the highest quality commercial or popular works should be used.
3244: 2706: 2503: 2427: 1291: 1236: 1221: 751: 421:
Single item "book reviews" written by scholars that explicitly discuss recent scholarship in an area.
409:"Review Articles", or historiographical essays that explicitly discuss recent scholarship in an area. 86:
This is a project to work towards guidelines for History-related articles equivalent to those about
3344: 2954: 2523: 2498: 2477: 1857: 1489: 1281: 846: 246:
Popular equivalents of the above published by historians who normally publish in the scholarly mode
176: 55: 415:
Journal articles or peer reviewed conference papers that open with a review of the historiography.
402:
To determine scholarly opinions about a historical topic, consult the following sources in order:
2518: 2508: 2422: 2395: 1659: 911: 515: 457: 363: 308: 188: 139: 65: 610:(U of Alabama Press, 1986). On how historians navigate the scholarly world, see William Palmer, 494:
If the claim is uninteresting to scholars, is it weighty enough to include in the encyclopaedia?
2974: 1938: 1777: 1674: 871: 632: 342: 289: 205:
Historical scholarship is a group process by a community of experts on a specialized topic of
2230: 2114: 2104: 2013: 677: 533: 437: 396: 381: 114: 43: 157:
Articles which deal with events in the past, or the scholarly process of producing history.
1867: 612:
Engagement with the Past: the lives and works of the World War II generation of historians
389: 87: 549:
The primary source used is the one used from a scholarly source, or a very close analogue
552:
The primary source is attributed, allowing readers to understand the origin of the quote
166:
example, exegesis is jargon primarily used in theology but also used in historiography.
3139: 3084: 2169: 1469: 436:
sections titled "Popular reactions to..." or the like. In the case that the views are
206: 3511: 3020:
Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith
295:
Annotated editions of primary sources, with the exception of the explicit annotations
58:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. 385: 17: 588:
Knowledge:Identifying and using style guides § Topical academic style guides
2221:
Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack
288:
Any primary source; however primary sources may be used in accord with the
126:
Historical articles on Knowledge should use scholarly works where possible.
346: 93:
History articles should always comply with the major content policies:
646: 510:
Reliable sources for purely illustrative purposes acting as a "picture"
418:
Earlier scholarly books and chapters on the historiography of the topic
406:
Recent scholarly books and chapters on the historiography of the topic
399:
views outside of the accepted practice, and these should not be used.
298:
Online editions of primary sources produced by libraries and archives.
1625:
Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument
243:
University level textbooks that summarize the scholarly literature.
223:
Research articles by historians in scholarly peer-reviewed journals
1090:
Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability
175:
descriptive label historian to refer to an historian. See also "
3400: 2937: 2544: 1750: 691: 650: 212:
The results of the scholarly process appear in numerous forms:
2907:
Knowledge is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
608:
The origin and development of scholarly historical periodicals
29: 2787:
Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article
1959:
Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals
2316:
Don't demand that editors solve the problems they identify
2125:
Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass
1720:
What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion
1060:
Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books
606:
The editorial process is explained in Margaret F. Stieg,
262:
Publications that are held in several academic libraries
3160:
How many Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb?
3170:
How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle
523: 465: 371: 316: 196: 147: 73: 2722:
No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
2356:
Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature
1427:
Knowledge is not being written in an organized fashion
2468:
There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns
1105:
Don't demolish the house while it's still being built
772:
Editing Knowledge is like visiting a foreign country
631:. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 1, 16, 70. 358:
Reliable sources for weighting and article structure
3459: 3413: 2486: 2193: 2057: 1891: 1763: 1523: 1450: 945: 704: 3431:Difference between policies, guidelines and essays 3210:Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them 392:the common views of scholars should be consulted. 694:Essays on building, editing, and deleting content 1555:Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions 1500:We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions 1252:Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography 543:The weighting is derived from a scholarly source 3230:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man 2960:Ain't no rules says a dog can't play basketball 2637:Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity 1277:Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area 782:Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia 2912:Knowledge is not the place to post your résumé 2657:Extracting the meaning of significant coverage 1823:High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors 1590:Counting and sorting are not original research 1620:Don't confuse stub status with non-notability 902:The role of policies in collaborative anarchy 662: 8: 3150:Seven Ages of Editor, by Will E. Spear-Shake 1914:An uncivil environment is a poor environment 1640:How to save an article proposed for deletion 917:We are absolutely here to right great wrongs 857:POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields 832:Not editing because of Knowledge restriction 2682:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability 1402:Understanding Knowledge's content standards 580:WikiProject Military history review essay: 546:The fact is derived from a scholarly source 431:Signed articles in scholarly encyclopaedias 3410: 3397: 3375:You don't have to be mad to work here, but 2947: 2934: 2762:Notability is not relevance or reliability 2717:News coverage does not decrease notability 2627:Discriminate vs indiscriminate information 2577:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 2554: 2541: 1760: 1747: 1570:Before commenting in a deletion discussion 1545:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 701: 688: 669: 655: 647: 115:Knowledge Military History Manual of Style 107:Knowledge:Reliable source examples#History 105:. It may be helpful to consult the essay 3270:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you 1560:Arguments to make in deletion discussions 1180:Identifying and using independent sources 3436:Don't cite essays as if they were policy 2597:Big events make key participants notable 1160:Formatting bilateral relations templates 428:represent a survey of the historiography 384:and structure an article so as to avoid 303:What is "recent" scholarship in history? 3484:How to contribute to Knowledge guidance 3100:Don't abbreviate "Knowledge" as "Wiki"! 2847:Solutions are mixtures and nothing else 2752:Notability is not a level playing field 2667:How the presumption of notability works 1783:Contributing to complicated discussions 1635:How the presumption of notability works 1155:Formatting bilateral relations articles 970:Adding images improves the encyclopedia 599: 582:Knowledge's Myth of the Clean Wehrmacht 3380:You should not write meaningless lists 2677:Historical/Policy/Notability/Arguments 1984:Staying cool when the editing gets hot 1725:When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork 1550:Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews 1115:Don't hope the house will build itself 892:Ten Simple Rules for Editing Knowledge 722:All Five Pillars are equally important 560:What this essay does not mean to imply 452:Reliable sources for individual claims 2807:One sentence does not an article make 2757:Notability is not a matter of opinion 2473:You can't squeeze blood from a turnip 2386:Don't throw your toys out of the pram 1904:A weak personal attack is still wrong 1843:Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors 1475:Don't throw more litter onto the pile 1242:Minors and persons judged incompetent 1005:An unfinished house is a real problem 990:Alternatives to the "Expand" template 614:(University Press of Kentucky, 2001). 88:reliable sources for medical articles 7: 3340:Things that should not be surprising 3035:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense 2361:Don't remind others of past misdeeds 2306:Don't come down like a ton of bricks 2291:Don't call people by their real name 1969:Profanity, civility, and discussions 1377:There are no shortcuts to neutrality 271:Historical scholarship is generally 239:Historical scholarship may include: 3235:No one cares about your garage band 2887:What is and is not routine coverage 2732:No one cares about your garage band 2652:Existence does not prove notability 2070:Assume the assumption of good faith 1999:There is no Divine Right of Editors 1853:Relationships with academic editors 1715:Why was the page I created deleted? 1150:Featured articles may have problems 575:Knowledge:Advanced source searching 3280:Please do not murder the newcomers 2837:Reducing consensus to an algorithm 2321:Don't drink the consensus Kool-Aid 2044:Knowledge should not be a monopoly 1535:Adjectives in your recommendations 1422:Knowledge is not a reliable source 1412:What an article should not include 1302:The problem with elegant variation 1110:Don't get hung up on minor details 56:thoroughly vetted by the community 52:Knowledge's policies or guidelines 25: 2602:Businesses with a single location 1883:You have a right to remain silent 1332:Restoring part of a reverted edit 1287:Potential, not just current state 1217:Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats 3523:Knowledge reliable source guides 2351:Don't knit beside the guillotine 2346:Don't ignore community consensus 1580:Confusing arguments mean nothing 33: 2852:Sources must be out-of-universe 2567:All high schools can be notable 1964:Old-fashioned Wikipedian values 1650:Identifying blatant advertising 1432:The world will not end tomorrow 1417:Knowledge is a work in progress 1262:Not everything needs a template 1175:How to write a featured article 792:External criticism of Knowledge 777:Editors will sometimes be wrong 487:views on the causes of things. 183:What is historical scholarship? 103:Knowledge:Neutral point of view 3441:Avoid writing redundant essays 3360:What Knowledge is not/Outtakes 3090:Don't stuff beans up your nose 2965:Akin's Laws of Article Writing 2792:Obscurity ≠ Lack of notability 2742:Notability cannot be purchased 2702:Masking the lack of notability 2039:Knowledge is not about winning 1465:Copyediting reception sections 1367:Temporary versions of articles 1297:Principle of Some Astonishment 1085:Creating controversial content 985:Akin's Laws of Article Writing 477:"who, when, where, what, how?" 282:Opinion pieces by non-scholars 99:Knowledge:No original research 1: 3467:About policies and guidelines 3220:List of jokes about Knowledge 2582:Articles with a single source 2029:Two wrongs don't make a right 2019:The rules of polite discourse 1949:It's not the end of the world 1710:Knowledge is not Whack-A-Mole 1257:Not everything needs a navbox 1125:Don't "teach the controversy" 937:Knowledge is not RationalWiki 797:Here to build an encyclopedia 113:, which are also used by the 3050:BOLD, revert, revert, revert 2970:Alternatives to edit warring 1833:Maintaining a friendly space 927:Knowledge is an encyclopedia 351:collapse of the Soviet Union 109:and the B-Class criteria of 3335:The Five Pillars of Untruth 3330:The first rule of Knowledge 3125:Editing under the influence 2902:Knowledge is not Crunchbase 2662:Google searches and numbers 2381:Don't template the regulars 2296:Don't call the kettle black 2090:Be excellent to one another 1974:Revert notification opt-out 1878:We are all Wikipedians here 1327:Put a little effort into it 1272:Obtain peer review comments 1227:Introduction to structurism 1165:Fruit of the poisonous tree 1135:Editors are not mindreaders 1040:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle 1030:Beef up that first revision 802:Leave it to the experienced 767:Don't search for objections 3539: 3365:Why not create an account? 3300:Requirements for adminship 3175:How to vandalize correctly 3105:Don't delete the main page 3025:Avoid using preview button 2747:Notability comparison test 2331:Don't fight fire with fire 2326:Don't eat the troll's food 2286:Don't call a spade a spade 2281:Don't bludgeon the process 2130:Encourage full discussions 1979:Shadowless Fists of Death! 1615:Don't attack the nominator 1575:But there must be sources! 1397:Try not to leave it a stub 1347:Source your plot summaries 629:Histories of the Holocaust 513: 455: 361: 306: 186: 137: 63: 27:Essay on editing Knowledge 3409: 3396: 3315:Sarcasm is really helpful 3255:Notability is not eternal 3180:How to win a citation war 2950: 2946: 2933: 2642:Every snowflake is unique 2562:Advanced source searching 2557: 2553: 2540: 2443:No, you can't have a pony 2391:Do not insult the vandals 2251:Don't be high-maintenance 1808:Encouraging the newcomers 1759: 1746: 1352:Specialized-style fallacy 1317:Pruning article revisions 1145:Endorsements (commercial) 1130:Editing on mobile devices 1035:Blind men and an elephant 1010:Articles have a half-life 757:Dissent is not disloyalty 727:Avoid vague introductions 700: 687: 3325:The Night Before Wikimas 3190:Ignore every single rule 3165:How to get away with UPE 3045:Before they were notable 2817:Overreliance upon Google 2612:Common sourcing mistakes 2185:Settle the process first 2145:Imagine others complexly 2049:Writing for the opponent 2024:There is no common sense 1705:Unopposed AFD discussion 1690:Relisting can be abusive 1565:Avoid repeated arguments 1170:Give an article a chance 1020:Avoid mission statements 980:Advanced text formatting 975:Advanced article editing 932:Knowledge is a community 907:The rules are principles 867:Product, process, policy 717:Articles must be written 3460:Policies and guidelines 3295:Requests for medication 3275:Please bite the newbies 3200:Mess with the templates 2767:Notability means impact 2301:Don't call things cruft 2276:Don't be the Fun Police 2206:Knowledge:Because I can 2085:Avoid the word "vandal" 1899:A thank you never hurts 1670:Liar liar pants on fire 1605:Deletion is not cleanup 1515:Writing better articles 1505:Write the article first 1480:Gender-neutral language 1452:Writing article content 1442:Writing better articles 1437:Write the article first 1372:Tertiary-source fallacy 1140:Encourage the newcomers 1100:Dictionaries as sources 1045:Build content to endure 349:ended in 1991 with the 95:Knowledge:Verifiability 3489:Policy writing is hard 3355:Knowledge is an MMORPG 3195:Is that even an essay? 2892:What notability is not 2647:Existence ≠ Notability 2256:Don't be inconsiderate 2180:Read before commenting 2165:Mind your own business 2080:Avoid personal remarks 1655:Identifying test edits 1000:A navbox on every page 955:100K featured articles 752:Concede lost arguments 747:Competence is required 382:weight different views 336:historical revisionism 3285:Pledge of Tranquility 3030:Avoid using wikilinks 2857:Subjective importance 2371:Don't spite your face 2160:Keep it down to earth 1924:Beware of the tigers! 1863:Too long; didn't read 1803:Edit at your own pace 1773:Accepting other users 1540:AfD is not a war zone 887:There is no seniority 827:Neutrality of sources 54:, as it has not been 3451:Quote your own essay 3320:Sausages for tasting 3145:Five Fs of Knowledge 3095:Don't-give-a-fuckism 3065:CaPiTaLiZaTiOn MuCh? 2877:Vanispamcruftisement 2777:Notability sub-pages 2587:Avoid template creep 2547:Essays on notability 2463:There are no oracles 2246:Don't be a WikiBigot 2100:Call a spade a spade 1873:Unblock perspectives 1700:The Heymann Standard 1685:Overzealous deletion 1645:I just don't like it 1382:There is no deadline 1247:"Murder of" articles 1075:Common-style fallacy 947:Article construction 862:Process is important 807:Levels of competence 732:Be a reliable source 3240:No one really cares 3155:Go ahead, vandalize 2917:Two prongs of merit 2862:Third-party sources 2782:Notabilitymandering 2737:No one really cares 2692:Inherent notability 2687:Independent sources 2572:Alternative outlets 2406:Nationalist editing 2376:Don't take the bait 2341:Don't help too much 2266:Don't be prejudiced 2236:Don't be an ostrich 2201:ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI 1934:Deletion as revenge 1909:Advice for hotheads 1730:No Encyclopedic Use 1610:Does deletion help? 1510:Writing about women 1392:The deadline is now 1387:There is a deadline 1267:Nothing is in stone 897:Tendentious editing 812:Levels of consensus 177:objective historian 134:Historical articles 111:WikiProject History 3250:No sorcery threats 3130:Embrace Stop Signs 3010:Assume good wraith 2985:Anti-Wikipedianism 2822:Perennial websites 2812:Other stuff exists 2448:Passive aggression 2411:No angry mastodons 2401:Hate is disruptive 2261:Don't be obnoxious 2226:Don't be a fanatic 2004:Most ideas are bad 1944:Forgive and forget 1753:Essays on civility 1362:Run an edit-a-thon 1095:Deprecated sources 1070:Citation underkill 1055:Chesterton's fence 1025:Be neutral in form 922:Knowledge in brief 877:Reasonability rule 842:Oversimplification 817:Most ideas are bad 170:Who is a historian 3505: 3504: 3501: 3500: 3497: 3496: 3392: 3391: 3388: 3387: 3370:Yes legal threats 3185:Ignore all essays 3070:Complete bollocks 2995:Asshole John rule 2929: 2928: 2925: 2924: 2882:What BLP1E is not 2802:One hundred words 2772:Notability points 2536: 2535: 2532: 2531: 2336:Don't give a fuck 2211:Civil POV pushing 2175:Mutual withdrawal 2065:Assume good faith 2034:Knowledge clichés 1929:Civility warnings 1848:Please say please 1798:Editors' pronouns 1742: 1741: 1738: 1737: 1630:Follow the leader 1495:Use our own words 1460:Avoid thread mode 1307:Pro and con lists 1065:Citation overkill 1015:Autosizing images 737:Civil POV pushing 637:978-0-19-956679-2 386:original research 343:Holocaust studies 84: 83: 16:(Redirected from 3530: 3518:Knowledge essays 3446:Finding an essay 3411: 3398: 3060:Butterfly effect 3055:Boston Tea Party 3015:Assume stupidity 3000:Assume bad faith 2990:Articlecountitis 2948: 2935: 2867:Trivial mentions 2712:Minimum coverage 2555: 2542: 2241:Don't be ashamed 2120:Discussing cruft 2110:Deny recognition 2009:Nothing is clear 1818:Expect no thanks 1761: 1748: 1680:Nothing is clear 1527:deleting content 1210:Tertiary sources 965:Acronym overkill 837:The one question 702: 689: 682: 678:Knowledge essays 671: 664: 657: 648: 642: 641: 621: 615: 604: 526: 468: 374: 319: 199: 150: 76: 37: 36: 30: 21: 3538: 3537: 3533: 3532: 3531: 3529: 3528: 3527: 3508: 3507: 3506: 3493: 3455: 3426:Value of essays 3405: 3384: 3215:Legal vandalism 3080:Counting juntas 2980:Anti-Wikipedian 2942: 2940:Humorous essays 2921: 2897:What to include 2842:Run-of-the-mill 2832:Read the source 2797:Offline sources 2592:Bare notability 2549: 2528: 2482: 2433:No Confederates 2231:Don't be a jerk 2189: 2155:Keep it concise 2095:Beyond civility 2053: 1887: 1828:How to be civil 1793:Don't retaliate 1755: 1734: 1665:Keep it concise 1600:Delete the junk 1595:Delete or merge 1585:Content removal 1519: 1485:Myth vs fiction 1446: 1337:Robotic editing 1200:Science sources 1195:Primary sources 1185:History sources 960:Abandoned stubs 941: 712:Article content 696: 683: 675: 645: 638: 623: 622: 618: 605: 601: 597: 571: 562: 530: 529: 522: 518: 512: 472: 471: 464: 460: 454: 378: 377: 370: 366: 360: 323: 322: 315: 311: 305: 203: 202: 195: 191: 185: 172: 154: 153: 146: 142: 136: 123: 80: 79: 72: 68: 60: 59: 34: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 3536: 3534: 3526: 3525: 3520: 3510: 3509: 3503: 3502: 3499: 3498: 3495: 3494: 3492: 3491: 3486: 3481: 3480: 3479: 3474: 3463: 3461: 3457: 3456: 3454: 3453: 3448: 3443: 3438: 3433: 3428: 3423: 3417: 3415: 3407: 3406: 3401: 3394: 3393: 3390: 3389: 3386: 3385: 3383: 3382: 3377: 3372: 3367: 3362: 3357: 3352: 3347: 3342: 3337: 3332: 3327: 3322: 3317: 3312: 3307: 3302: 3297: 3292: 3287: 3282: 3277: 3272: 3267: 3262: 3257: 3252: 3247: 3242: 3237: 3232: 3227: 3222: 3217: 3212: 3207: 3202: 3197: 3192: 3187: 3182: 3177: 3172: 3167: 3162: 3157: 3152: 3147: 3142: 3137: 3132: 3127: 3122: 3120:Editsummarisis 3117: 3112: 3107: 3102: 3097: 3092: 3087: 3082: 3077: 3075:Counting forks 3072: 3067: 3062: 3057: 3052: 3047: 3042: 3037: 3032: 3027: 3022: 3017: 3012: 3007: 3002: 2997: 2992: 2987: 2982: 2977: 2972: 2967: 2962: 2957: 2951: 2944: 2943: 2938: 2931: 2930: 2927: 2926: 2923: 2922: 2920: 2919: 2914: 2909: 2904: 2899: 2894: 2889: 2884: 2879: 2874: 2869: 2864: 2859: 2854: 2849: 2844: 2839: 2834: 2829: 2824: 2819: 2814: 2809: 2804: 2799: 2794: 2789: 2784: 2779: 2774: 2769: 2764: 2759: 2754: 2749: 2744: 2739: 2734: 2729: 2724: 2719: 2714: 2709: 2704: 2699: 2694: 2689: 2684: 2679: 2674: 2669: 2664: 2659: 2654: 2649: 2644: 2639: 2634: 2632:Don't cite GNG 2629: 2624: 2619: 2614: 2609: 2607:But it's true! 2604: 2599: 2594: 2589: 2584: 2579: 2574: 2569: 2564: 2558: 2551: 2550: 2545: 2538: 2537: 2534: 2533: 2530: 2529: 2527: 2526: 2521: 2516: 2511: 2506: 2504:WikiHarassment 2501: 2496: 2490: 2488: 2484: 2483: 2481: 2480: 2475: 2470: 2465: 2460: 2455: 2450: 2445: 2440: 2438:No queerphobia 2435: 2430: 2425: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2408: 2403: 2398: 2393: 2388: 2383: 2378: 2373: 2368: 2363: 2358: 2353: 2348: 2343: 2338: 2333: 2328: 2323: 2318: 2313: 2308: 2303: 2298: 2293: 2288: 2283: 2278: 2273: 2268: 2263: 2258: 2253: 2248: 2243: 2238: 2233: 2228: 2223: 2218: 2213: 2208: 2203: 2197: 2195: 2191: 2190: 2188: 2187: 2182: 2177: 2172: 2167: 2162: 2157: 2152: 2147: 2142: 2137: 2132: 2127: 2122: 2117: 2112: 2107: 2102: 2097: 2092: 2087: 2082: 2077: 2075:Assume no clue 2072: 2067: 2061: 2059: 2055: 2054: 2052: 2051: 2046: 2041: 2036: 2031: 2026: 2021: 2016: 2011: 2006: 2001: 1996: 1991: 1986: 1981: 1976: 1971: 1966: 1961: 1956: 1951: 1946: 1941: 1936: 1931: 1926: 1921: 1916: 1911: 1906: 1901: 1895: 1893: 1889: 1888: 1886: 1885: 1880: 1875: 1870: 1865: 1860: 1855: 1850: 1845: 1840: 1835: 1830: 1825: 1820: 1815: 1813:Enjoy yourself 1810: 1805: 1800: 1795: 1790: 1785: 1780: 1775: 1769: 1767: 1757: 1756: 1751: 1744: 1743: 1740: 1739: 1736: 1735: 1733: 1732: 1727: 1722: 1717: 1712: 1707: 1702: 1697: 1692: 1687: 1682: 1677: 1672: 1667: 1662: 1657: 1652: 1647: 1642: 1637: 1632: 1627: 1622: 1617: 1612: 1607: 1602: 1597: 1592: 1587: 1582: 1577: 1572: 1567: 1562: 1557: 1552: 1547: 1542: 1537: 1531: 1529: 1526: 1521: 1520: 1518: 1517: 1512: 1507: 1502: 1497: 1492: 1487: 1482: 1477: 1472: 1467: 1462: 1456: 1454: 1448: 1447: 1445: 1444: 1439: 1434: 1429: 1424: 1419: 1414: 1409: 1404: 1399: 1394: 1389: 1384: 1379: 1374: 1369: 1364: 1359: 1354: 1349: 1344: 1342:Sham consensus 1339: 1334: 1329: 1324: 1319: 1314: 1309: 1304: 1299: 1294: 1289: 1284: 1279: 1274: 1269: 1264: 1259: 1254: 1249: 1244: 1239: 1234: 1229: 1224: 1219: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1207: 1202: 1197: 1192: 1187: 1177: 1172: 1167: 1162: 1157: 1152: 1147: 1142: 1137: 1132: 1127: 1122: 1117: 1112: 1107: 1102: 1097: 1092: 1087: 1082: 1077: 1072: 1067: 1062: 1057: 1052: 1047: 1042: 1037: 1032: 1027: 1022: 1017: 1012: 1007: 1002: 997: 992: 987: 982: 977: 972: 967: 962: 957: 951: 949: 943: 942: 940: 939: 934: 929: 924: 919: 914: 909: 904: 899: 894: 889: 884: 879: 874: 869: 864: 859: 854: 849: 844: 839: 834: 829: 824: 819: 814: 809: 804: 799: 794: 789: 787:Explanationism 784: 779: 774: 769: 764: 759: 754: 749: 744: 739: 734: 729: 724: 719: 714: 708: 706: 698: 697: 692: 685: 684: 676: 674: 673: 666: 659: 651: 644: 643: 636: 616: 598: 596: 593: 592: 591: 585: 577: 570: 567: 561: 558: 554: 553: 550: 547: 544: 528: 527: 519: 514: 511: 508: 503: 502: 499: 495: 470: 469: 461: 456: 453: 450: 448:argued aside. 433: 432: 429: 422: 419: 416: 413: 410: 407: 376: 375: 367: 362: 359: 356: 355: 354: 339: 321: 320: 312: 307: 304: 301: 300: 299: 296: 293: 286: 283: 280: 269: 268: 260: 257: 253: 250: 247: 244: 237: 236: 235: 234: 227: 224: 221: 217: 207:historiography 201: 200: 192: 187: 184: 181: 171: 168: 159: 158: 152: 151: 143: 138: 135: 132: 131: 130: 127: 122: 119: 82: 81: 78: 77: 69: 64: 61: 49: 48: 40: 38: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3535: 3524: 3521: 3519: 3516: 3515: 3513: 3490: 3487: 3485: 3482: 3478: 3475: 3473: 3470: 3469: 3468: 3465: 3464: 3462: 3458: 3452: 3449: 3447: 3444: 3442: 3439: 3437: 3434: 3432: 3429: 3427: 3424: 3422: 3419: 3418: 3416: 3412: 3408: 3404: 3399: 3395: 3381: 3378: 3376: 3373: 3371: 3368: 3366: 3363: 3361: 3358: 3356: 3353: 3351: 3350:Watchlistitis 3348: 3346: 3345:The WikiBible 3343: 3341: 3338: 3336: 3333: 3331: 3328: 3326: 3323: 3321: 3318: 3316: 3313: 3311: 3308: 3306: 3303: 3301: 3298: 3296: 3293: 3291: 3290:R-e-s-p-e-c-t 3288: 3286: 3283: 3281: 3278: 3276: 3273: 3271: 3268: 3266: 3265:Play the game 3263: 3261: 3258: 3256: 3253: 3251: 3248: 3246: 3243: 3241: 3238: 3236: 3233: 3231: 3228: 3226: 3223: 3221: 3218: 3216: 3213: 3211: 3208: 3206: 3205:My local pond 3203: 3201: 3198: 3196: 3193: 3191: 3188: 3186: 3183: 3181: 3178: 3176: 3173: 3171: 3168: 3166: 3163: 3161: 3158: 3156: 3153: 3151: 3148: 3146: 3143: 3141: 3138: 3136: 3133: 3131: 3128: 3126: 3123: 3121: 3118: 3116: 3115:Edits Per Day 3113: 3111: 3110:Editcountitis 3108: 3106: 3103: 3101: 3098: 3096: 3093: 3091: 3088: 3086: 3083: 3081: 3078: 3076: 3073: 3071: 3068: 3066: 3063: 3061: 3058: 3056: 3053: 3051: 3048: 3046: 3043: 3041: 3038: 3036: 3033: 3031: 3028: 3026: 3023: 3021: 3018: 3016: 3013: 3011: 3008: 3006: 3003: 3001: 2998: 2996: 2993: 2991: 2988: 2986: 2983: 2981: 2978: 2976: 2973: 2971: 2968: 2966: 2963: 2961: 2958: 2956: 2953: 2952: 2949: 2945: 2941: 2936: 2932: 2918: 2915: 2913: 2910: 2908: 2905: 2903: 2900: 2898: 2895: 2893: 2890: 2888: 2885: 2883: 2880: 2878: 2875: 2873: 2870: 2868: 2865: 2863: 2860: 2858: 2855: 2853: 2850: 2848: 2845: 2843: 2840: 2838: 2835: 2833: 2830: 2828: 2825: 2823: 2820: 2818: 2815: 2813: 2810: 2808: 2805: 2803: 2800: 2798: 2795: 2793: 2790: 2788: 2785: 2783: 2780: 2778: 2775: 2773: 2770: 2768: 2765: 2763: 2760: 2758: 2755: 2753: 2750: 2748: 2745: 2743: 2740: 2738: 2735: 2733: 2730: 2728: 2725: 2723: 2720: 2718: 2715: 2713: 2710: 2708: 2705: 2703: 2700: 2698: 2697:Insignificant 2695: 2693: 2690: 2688: 2685: 2683: 2680: 2678: 2675: 2673: 2670: 2668: 2665: 2663: 2660: 2658: 2655: 2653: 2650: 2648: 2645: 2643: 2640: 2638: 2635: 2633: 2630: 2628: 2625: 2623: 2620: 2618: 2615: 2613: 2610: 2608: 2605: 2603: 2600: 2598: 2595: 2593: 2590: 2588: 2585: 2583: 2580: 2578: 2575: 2573: 2570: 2568: 2565: 2563: 2560: 2559: 2556: 2552: 2548: 2543: 2539: 2525: 2522: 2520: 2517: 2515: 2514:WikiLawyering 2512: 2510: 2507: 2505: 2502: 2500: 2497: 2495: 2492: 2491: 2489: 2487:WikiRelations 2485: 2479: 2476: 2474: 2471: 2469: 2466: 2464: 2461: 2459: 2456: 2454: 2451: 2449: 2446: 2444: 2441: 2439: 2436: 2434: 2431: 2429: 2426: 2424: 2421: 2417: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2409: 2407: 2404: 2402: 2399: 2397: 2394: 2392: 2389: 2387: 2384: 2382: 2379: 2377: 2374: 2372: 2369: 2367: 2364: 2362: 2359: 2357: 2354: 2352: 2349: 2347: 2344: 2342: 2339: 2337: 2334: 2332: 2329: 2327: 2324: 2322: 2319: 2317: 2314: 2312: 2311:Don't cry COI 2309: 2307: 2304: 2302: 2299: 2297: 2294: 2292: 2289: 2287: 2284: 2282: 2279: 2277: 2274: 2272: 2271:Don't be rude 2269: 2267: 2264: 2262: 2259: 2257: 2254: 2252: 2249: 2247: 2244: 2242: 2239: 2237: 2234: 2232: 2229: 2227: 2224: 2222: 2219: 2217: 2216:Cyberbullying 2214: 2212: 2209: 2207: 2204: 2202: 2199: 2198: 2196: 2192: 2186: 2183: 2181: 2178: 2176: 2173: 2171: 2168: 2166: 2163: 2161: 2158: 2156: 2153: 2151: 2148: 2146: 2143: 2141: 2138: 2136: 2133: 2131: 2128: 2126: 2123: 2121: 2118: 2116: 2113: 2111: 2108: 2106: 2103: 2101: 2098: 2096: 2093: 2091: 2088: 2086: 2083: 2081: 2078: 2076: 2073: 2071: 2068: 2066: 2063: 2062: 2060: 2056: 2050: 2047: 2045: 2042: 2040: 2037: 2035: 2032: 2030: 2027: 2025: 2022: 2020: 2017: 2015: 2012: 2010: 2007: 2005: 2002: 2000: 1997: 1995: 1994:The last word 1992: 1990: 1989:The grey zone 1987: 1985: 1982: 1980: 1977: 1975: 1972: 1970: 1967: 1965: 1962: 1960: 1957: 1955: 1952: 1950: 1947: 1945: 1942: 1940: 1937: 1935: 1932: 1930: 1927: 1925: 1922: 1920: 1917: 1915: 1912: 1910: 1907: 1905: 1902: 1900: 1897: 1896: 1894: 1890: 1884: 1881: 1879: 1876: 1874: 1871: 1869: 1866: 1864: 1861: 1859: 1856: 1854: 1851: 1849: 1846: 1844: 1841: 1839: 1836: 1834: 1831: 1829: 1826: 1824: 1821: 1819: 1816: 1814: 1811: 1809: 1806: 1804: 1801: 1799: 1796: 1794: 1791: 1789: 1786: 1784: 1781: 1779: 1776: 1774: 1771: 1770: 1768: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1749: 1745: 1731: 1728: 1726: 1723: 1721: 1718: 1716: 1713: 1711: 1708: 1706: 1703: 1701: 1698: 1696: 1693: 1691: 1688: 1686: 1683: 1681: 1678: 1676: 1673: 1671: 1668: 1666: 1663: 1661: 1658: 1656: 1653: 1651: 1648: 1646: 1643: 1641: 1638: 1636: 1633: 1631: 1628: 1626: 1623: 1621: 1618: 1616: 1613: 1611: 1608: 1606: 1603: 1601: 1598: 1596: 1593: 1591: 1588: 1586: 1583: 1581: 1578: 1576: 1573: 1571: 1568: 1566: 1563: 1561: 1558: 1556: 1553: 1551: 1548: 1546: 1543: 1541: 1538: 1536: 1533: 1532: 1530: 1528: 1522: 1516: 1513: 1511: 1508: 1506: 1503: 1501: 1498: 1496: 1493: 1491: 1488: 1486: 1483: 1481: 1478: 1476: 1473: 1471: 1468: 1466: 1463: 1461: 1458: 1457: 1455: 1453: 1449: 1443: 1440: 1438: 1435: 1433: 1430: 1428: 1425: 1423: 1420: 1418: 1415: 1413: 1410: 1408: 1407:Walled garden 1405: 1403: 1400: 1398: 1395: 1393: 1390: 1388: 1385: 1383: 1380: 1378: 1375: 1373: 1370: 1368: 1365: 1363: 1360: 1358: 1355: 1353: 1350: 1348: 1345: 1343: 1340: 1338: 1335: 1333: 1330: 1328: 1325: 1323: 1320: 1318: 1315: 1313: 1310: 1308: 1305: 1303: 1300: 1298: 1295: 1293: 1290: 1288: 1285: 1283: 1280: 1278: 1275: 1273: 1270: 1268: 1265: 1263: 1260: 1258: 1255: 1253: 1250: 1248: 1245: 1243: 1240: 1238: 1235: 1233: 1232:Mine a source 1230: 1228: 1225: 1223: 1220: 1218: 1215: 1211: 1208: 1206: 1203: 1201: 1198: 1196: 1193: 1191: 1188: 1186: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1178: 1176: 1173: 1171: 1168: 1166: 1163: 1161: 1158: 1156: 1153: 1151: 1148: 1146: 1143: 1141: 1138: 1136: 1133: 1131: 1128: 1126: 1123: 1121: 1118: 1116: 1113: 1111: 1108: 1106: 1103: 1101: 1098: 1096: 1093: 1091: 1088: 1086: 1083: 1081: 1080:Concept cloud 1078: 1076: 1073: 1071: 1068: 1066: 1063: 1061: 1058: 1056: 1053: 1051: 1050:Cherrypicking 1048: 1046: 1043: 1041: 1038: 1036: 1033: 1031: 1028: 1026: 1023: 1021: 1018: 1016: 1013: 1011: 1008: 1006: 1003: 1001: 998: 996: 993: 991: 988: 986: 983: 981: 978: 976: 973: 971: 968: 966: 963: 961: 958: 956: 953: 952: 950: 948: 944: 938: 935: 933: 930: 928: 925: 923: 920: 918: 915: 913: 910: 908: 905: 903: 900: 898: 895: 893: 890: 888: 885: 883: 882:Systemic bias 880: 878: 875: 873: 870: 868: 865: 863: 860: 858: 855: 853: 850: 848: 845: 843: 840: 838: 835: 833: 830: 828: 825: 823: 820: 818: 815: 813: 810: 808: 805: 803: 800: 798: 795: 793: 790: 788: 785: 783: 780: 778: 775: 773: 770: 768: 765: 763: 760: 758: 755: 753: 750: 748: 745: 743: 740: 738: 735: 733: 730: 728: 725: 723: 720: 718: 715: 713: 710: 709: 707: 703: 699: 695: 690: 686: 679: 672: 667: 665: 660: 658: 653: 652: 649: 639: 634: 630: 626: 620: 617: 613: 609: 603: 600: 594: 589: 586: 584: 583: 578: 576: 573: 572: 568: 566: 559: 557: 551: 548: 545: 542: 541: 540: 537: 535: 525: 521: 520: 517: 509: 507: 500: 496: 493: 492: 491: 488: 484: 482: 478: 467: 463: 462: 459: 451: 449: 445: 442: 439: 430: 427: 423: 420: 417: 414: 411: 408: 405: 404: 403: 400: 398: 393: 391: 387: 383: 373: 369: 368: 365: 357: 352: 348: 344: 340: 337: 333: 332: 331: 327: 318: 314: 313: 310: 302: 297: 294: 291: 287: 284: 281: 278: 277: 276: 274: 265: 261: 258: 254: 251: 248: 245: 242: 241: 240: 232: 231: 228: 225: 222: 218: 215: 214: 213: 210: 208: 198: 194: 193: 190: 182: 180: 178: 169: 167: 163: 156: 155: 149: 145: 144: 141: 133: 128: 125: 124: 120: 118: 116: 112: 108: 104: 100: 96: 91: 89: 75: 71: 70: 67: 62: 57: 53: 47: 45: 39: 32: 31: 19: 18:Knowledge:HSC 3414:About essays 3403:About essays 3310:Rouge editor 3260:Oops Defense 3040:Barnstaritis 3005:Assume faith 2827:Pokémon test 2672:High Schools 2494:WikiBullying 2458:Superhatting 2453:POV railroad 2150:Just drop it 1954:Nobody cares 1788:Divisiveness 1312:Printability 1205:Style guides 1184: 995:Amnesia test 852:Paraphrasing 628: 619: 611: 607: 602: 581: 563: 555: 538: 531: 504: 489: 485: 480: 476: 473: 446: 440: 434: 425: 401: 394: 379: 328: 324: 272: 270: 263: 238: 211: 204: 173: 164: 160: 92: 85: 41: 3421:Essay guide 3305:Rouge admin 2872:Video links 2727:No big loss 2416:just madmen 2366:Don't shout 2140:How to lose 2135:Get over it 1919:Be the glue 1838:Negotiation 1695:Relist bias 1525:Removing or 1357:Stub Makers 1190:Law sources 1120:Don't panic 42:This is an 3512:Categories 3477:Guidelines 3245:No, really 3225:LTTAUTMAOK 2707:Make stubs 2428:No racists 2170:Say "MOBY" 1892:Philosophy 1765:The basics 1322:Publicists 1292:Presentism 1237:Merge Test 1222:Inaccuracy 705:Philosophy 625:Stone, Dan 290:WP:Primary 279:Journalism 2955:Adminitis 2524:WikiPeace 2499:WikiCrime 2478:UPPERCASE 1858:Thank you 1490:Proseline 1282:Permastub 847:Paradoxes 762:Don't lie 524:WP:HISTIP 466:WP:HISTIC 390:synthesis 372:WP:HISTRW 345:, as the 317:WP:HISTRH 148:WP:HISTAR 74:WP:HISTRS 3472:Policies 2622:Coatrack 2519:WikiLove 2509:WikiHate 2423:No Nazis 2396:Griefing 1660:Immunity 912:Trifecta 742:Cohesion 627:(2010). 569:See also 534:weighted 516:Shortcut 498:account? 458:Shortcut 364:Shortcut 347:Cold War 309:Shortcut 256:journals 189:Shortcut 140:Shortcut 121:Nutshell 66:Shortcut 3135:Emerson 2975:ANI flu 1939:Failure 1778:Apology 1675:Nothing 872:Purpose 590:(essay) 220:editors 2617:Clones 2194:Don'ts 2115:Desist 2105:Candor 2014:Reader 481:"why?" 438:fringe 397:fringe 197:WP:HSC 101:, and 1868:Truce 595:Notes 426:often 44:essay 3140:Fart 3085:Crap 1470:Coup 822:Need 633:ISBN 388:and 2058:Dos 681:(?) 441:and 380:To 341:In 273:not 264:may 179:". 3514:: 275:: 117:. 97:, 90:. 670:e 663:t 656:v 640:. 338:. 46:. 20:)

Index

Knowledge:HSC
essay
Knowledge's policies or guidelines
thoroughly vetted by the community
Shortcut
WP:HISTRS
reliable sources for medical articles
Knowledge:Verifiability
Knowledge:No original research
Knowledge:Neutral point of view
Knowledge:Reliable source examples#History
WikiProject History
Knowledge Military History Manual of Style
Shortcut
WP:HISTAR
objective historian
Shortcut
WP:HSC
historiography
WP:Primary
Shortcut
WP:HISTRH
historical revisionism
Holocaust studies
Cold War
collapse of the Soviet Union
Shortcut
WP:HISTRW
weight different views
original research

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑