Knowledge

:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2010-08-17/Voluntary Human Extinction Movement - Knowledge

Source đź“ť

42: 964:, especially since this is a cabal mediation. My intent is to be helpful in a general sense, as I have an interest in the article in general. Do you have any questions for me? (and please, if you do, just ask them here and I'll answer in the usual indented fashion--I confess I have a hard time following the format you've been using with Bobrayner and 207.61.241.100. -- 439:
came from the statement** by the other party (207.61.241.100). And said party was notified that there were areas on the DRR that required his/her input (i.e. his/her signature to the DRR filing statement / or a revision of same). Regardless of your misinterpretation, I also consider your statements
718:
Otherwise, my request is that you (Bobrayner) recuse yourself; your actions have been questionable and you are a novice without mediation experience. Yet, this Mediation Cabal case should remain active ("Cases needing mediators") because there is the possibility that an experienced Mediator(s) will
768:
Perhaps there has been some misunderstanding, skyeking. I am here to mediate on the subject that you proposed for mediation. I am not here to accuse or exhonerate you of other things that might or might not have happened on that article; you seem very sensitive about ownership but we don't have to
376:
reluctant to move people's text around, but I think it was necessary again, because skyeking accidentally put a large volume of text in the "mediator notes" section, of which only a small part was related to anything I said. Skyeking is not the mediator. Since the text appeared to be discussion, I
772:
This is the second case that I have taken on as mediator. If you had specified in advance that you required a mediator with experience of more than X cases, I would not have taken on this case. Do you have any other rules that you want to apply to mediation? Please let us know sooner rather than
846:
Your question is ambiguous. My interpretation of your question is, “I would like to help you (and 207.61.241.100). Can you and I (as we await 207.61.241.100) calmly and logically discuss why you and 207.61.241.100 are at an impasse in the editing dispute discussion? – (as defined in the DRR
776:
I have seen the discussion you link to. I have also seen the article history and the article talkpage history, which contains a great deal more information relevant to the subject, much of which has been deleted by skyeking. Now, can we try to discuss the problem that you
377:
reluctantly moved it to the "discussion" section. If you feel it is important to put it under "mediator notes", or if you are not sure how to edit, please let me know and I will try to help. It would be good if everybody could try to present their points clearly.
380:
I'm sorry if you feel I accused you of anything. Looking at the page history, I think the page might have some ownership problems, but I certainly did not accuse you of anything. However, if people feel that page ownership is part of the problem, we can discuss
425:
I have removed the comment above which implied agreement by 207.61.241.100, because it was written by Skyeking. I hope you don’t mind. Please try to avoid the appearance of putting words in other people’s mouths. If you agree to mediation, please sign
365:
I have removed the comment above which implied agreement by 207.61.241.100, because it was written by Skyeking. I hope you don't mind. Please try to avoid the appearance of putting words in other people's mouths. If you agree to mediation, please sign
559:
The following conversation relates to the Section: Mediator Notes. I (Skyeking) would normally copy portions of Bobrayner’s statements; provides continuity of discussion. But, in this situation readers will need to reference the Section: Mediator
466:“Finally, my leisure time is extremely limited; therefore I don’t have time to be a dedicated Wikipedian. So, I chose the VHEMT Article because I recognized that said Article suffered from gross vandalism and irresponsible Editors.” 384:
If you do not agree to moderation then we cannot make much progress here, and I may close the case. Are you sure? There does still seem to be a problem on the page. If you would like to work towards a solution, I would like to
714:
consider accepting you as a Mediator – when an additional Senior Mediator (i.e. User:PhilKnight) is assigned (his name added to the information block; confirmation) to oversee you, and monitor your compliance with mediation
419:
The following conversation was moved by the acting Mediator (Bobrayner) from the above Section: Mediator Notes. In addition, Skyeking copied portions of Bobrayner’s statements; provides continuity of discussion.
729:
be applied to the mediation discussion. And my request is that this Mediation Cabal case remain active ("Cases needing mediators") because there is a possibility that an experienced Mediator(s) will choose the
580:
when you use the generic word “page” – i.e. Article Page / Article Talk Page / User Talk Page / User Page / Skyeking’s User Talk Page / and so on. Otherwise, you are causing ineffective communication.
722:
In addition, at this time, I believe you have a responsibility to consult with User:PhilKnight (or other Senior Mediators) – the beginning of this mediation has already become crippled.
217:
refrain from birthing a human (population control) – unselfish action(s), motivated by the desire to benefit others – volunteering (choosing) to help lower human overpopulation.
296:
The parts of a written communication, speech, etc., that precede and follow a word or passage and contribute to its full meaning – i.e. “It is unfair to quote out of context.”
773:
later. I hope there won't be many rules, as the more you try to control the discussion, the less likely it is that we'll reach a solution everybody is happy with.
1072:
PhilKnight, thanks for closing the case. I had been waiting for 207.61.241.100 to contribute, but we can only wait so long. Thanks, everyone, for your time. ;-)
835:
methods. And should I err (violate mediation methods) my hope is that others will offer me a definitive correction statement for my evaluation (understanding).
618:
Do you believe that you have complied with the following links? If so, what percentage number (20% – 40% – etc.) would you assign to your level of compliance?
812:
My interpretation of your question is, “Are you willing to continue with mediation?” If my clarification of your question is correct, then my answer is: Yes.
1110: 1081: 1064: 1030: 1011: 975: 944: 930: 791: 757: 743: 550: 396: 348: 477:“I’ve amended my comment above to remove the potential conflict of interest claim; it was minor and did not belong on the talk page. My apologies.” 1128: 187:–Current argument of 207.61.241.100 is that the VHEMT Article will be improved if two article links (“Altruism” / “Morality”) are removed. 251:
changing (exponentially increasing / continual population growth) – i.e. 230,000 births per 24-hours (actualized; deaths already offset).
130: 678:
As I understand your statement (quote), “…..I certainly did not accuse you of anything.” – you have declared that Skyeking (myself) is
998:
My communication format is because of health reasons (privacy). I’m thankful for your tolerance of my written communication style.
853:
But, are we supposed to be discussing without the attendance of 207.61.241.100 (thus far he/she has not offered any statements)?
235:
numbers. It is illogical to define and/or require altruistic action(s) to be dependent upon a numbers game – such numbers are
21: 1048:
To those who have edited (or interest in) the VHEMT Article, "What are your thoughts about closing this Mediation Cabal Case?"
769:
discuss it here if you don't want. However, you now seem more willing to continue with mediation. Is that the case or not?
258:
if you refresh (reload) the web page – key the refresh button of your web browser (Firefox, Opera, Chrome, and so on).
831:(elucidate), and my future requests (rules). In addition, my reasonable expectation is that others will comply with 457:"Whatever, add a request....." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.61.241.100 (talk) 20:37, 18 August 2010 (UTC) 893:
Is there a cut-off date when people are no longer allowed to sign-in (i.e. become participants in this mediation)?
624: 33: 17: 703:
My first evaluation of your mediator skills was that you are an inexperienced novice. My second evaluation (
645:
Are you confused about the location of the editing dispute discussion between Skyeking and 207.61.241.100?
858:
Regardless that I have interpretation skills, others may not – thereby causing ineffective communication.
607:
From September 1, 2009 – August 1, 2010; were you an assigned Mediator to any “Mediation Cabal” case(s)?
867:
What is the communication status of 207.61.241.100? Is he/she going to participate in the mediation?
1077: 787: 481: 441: 392: 148: 95: 1106: 1060: 1007: 940: 926: 753: 739: 664: 660: 656: 546: 436: 431:
I do mind your implication of (quote), “…..appearance of putting words in other people’s mouths.”
344: 123: 119: 115: 80: 1025: 970: 632: 482:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Voluntary_Human_Extinction_Movement#Notability_and_single-source
333:
Unknown – yet, both Editors agreed to the filing of this Dispute Resolution Request (WP:DRR).
594:
Prior to August 31, 2009 – were you an assigned Mediator to any “Mediation Cabal” case(s)?
725:
Finally, I am willing to participate in mediation; my provision is that a proper form of
272:
Frequently used in the phrase “diametrically opposed”; meaning absolutely in opposition.
1073: 783: 704: 388: 91: 1122: 1102: 1056: 1003: 936: 922: 749: 735: 542: 340: 143: 76: 633:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Mediation_Committee/Policy#Procedure_for_mediation
522:“.....other related disagreements.....I can see some serious ownership problems..... 1021: 966: 304:
A person who renders aid, performs a service, or assumes an obligation voluntarily.
153: 1091:
PhilKnight (Administrator), you have my heartfelt "Thank You" for your assistance.
242:
I’m at an impasse; diametrically opposed conclusions against Editor 207.61.241.100
900:
You (Bobrayner) asked the question, “Would any other editors like to contribute?”
288:
A judgment or decision reached after deliberation (discussion and consideration).
877:
Nuujinn has not presented any opening statement(s). Why not? What is his role?
872:
Is there a finite number to how many parties are to be included this mediation?
529:
http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Bobrayner#Voluntary_Human_Extinction_Movement
248: 41: 832: 824: 726: 338:
I, Skyeking agree to the filing of this Dispute Resolution Request (WP:DRR).
625:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Suggestions_for_mediators
335:
The two Editors (Who Is Involved?) are awaiting the guidance of a Mediator.
323:
The two Editors (Who Is Involved?) are awaiting the guidance of a Mediator.
1019:
Duly noted, I'll do the best I can with it, thanks for the clarification.
690:(It would be good if everybody could try to present their points clearly.) 672:(It would be good if everybody could try to present their points clearly.) 174: 170: 1050:
In addition, the same question applies to the case Mediator (Bobrayner).
850:
If my clarification of your question is correct, then my answer is: Yes.
696:
Who are you accusing of WP:COI / WP:OWNER (declare the names - User ID)?
882:
Regarding the DRR question: Who is involved? – is there a closing date?
528: 231:
An altruistic action is validated by the action (and benefit) itself –
470: 827:). Ambiguity is unacceptable. And, I reserve the prerogative of 960:
Skyeking, regarding my role, I don't believe I have a formal one
817:
Do you have any other rules that you want to apply to mediation?
213:(altruistic actions) as it applies to individuals worldwide who 183:
Article Revision History – 07:34, 10 August 2010 207.61.241.100
435:
Though my thoughtfulness (intent) is misinterpreted by you, my
497:
2. Causing or tending to preconceived judgment or convictions.
192:–Current argument of Skyeking is that the VHEMT Article will 651:
To clarify; the dispute resolution discussion that is at an
584:
Second, I request answers from Bobrayner to these questions:
205:
Dispute Resolution Discussion – Main Topic (proper context):
223:
Unresolved Contention / Diametrically Opposed Conclusions:
444:
as prejudicial, unsubstantiated, and “muddy the waters”.
362:
I'll take this case on, if you would like me to mediate.
840:
Now, can we try to discuss the problem that you raised?
455:<**Statement by the other party (207.61.241.100): 602:(All dates from September 1, 2009 – August 1, 2010) 565:(All statements located at Section: Mediator Notes) 87: 72: 64: 56: 48: 32: 196:be improved if the two article links are removed. 910:What is the definitive meaning of your question? 114:The dispute resolution discussion is located at 823:Yes. I prefer definitive questions (method of 801:Now continuing conversation with Bobrayner..... 572:Now continuing conversation with Bobrayner..... 518:EXAMPLE – Paraphrased (not complete statement): 254:The Population Clock numbers will change every 982:Now continuing conversation with Nuujinn..... 280:A dispute where there is strong disagreement. 8: 949:«««»»»Awaiting response from Bobrayner«««»»» 762:«««»»»Awaiting response from bobrayner«««»»» 780:Would any other editors like to contribute? 993:Not at this time. Thank you for offering. 471:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Jagerman 239:applicable (irrelevant) to the Main Topic. 319:What would you like to change about this? 682:of WP:COI / WP:OWNER. Is that correct? 567:“I am extremely reluctant to move..... 169:The deletion of two Knowledge links (“ 29: 534:As previously stated, I respectfully 475:Paraphrased (not complete statement): 464:Paraphrased (not complete statement): 7: 589:(All dates prior to August 31, 2009) 514:To make a situation more confusing. 131:Voluntary Human Extinction Movement 52:Voluntary Human Extinction Movement 28: 1094:And I echo Bobrayner's statement. 987:Do you have any questions for me? 526:21:28, 20 August 2010 – bobrayner 847:question: What is the dispute?). 707:) confirmed my first evaluation. 40: 468:05:47, 31 March 2010 – Skyeking 1111:21:14, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 1082:00:00, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 1065:22:03, 19 September 2010 (UTC) 538:your offer of acting Mediator. 505:Unsupported by other evidence. 479:17:10, 4 April 2010 – Jagerman 452:your offer of acting Mediator. 1: 1129:Knowledge Medcab closed cases 329:How do you think we can help? 247:Human population numbers are 1031:21:01, 22 August 2010 (UTC) 1012:20:49, 22 August 2010 (UTC) 976:12:23, 22 August 2010 (UTC) 945:03:00, 22 August 2010 (UTC) 931:03:00, 22 August 2010 (UTC) 862:Now, I have some questions: 792:19:51, 21 August 2010 (UTC) 758:13:50, 21 August 2010 (UTC) 744:13:50, 21 August 2010 (UTC) 551:01:04, 21 August 2010 (UTC) 397:02:35, 21 August 2010 (UTC) 349:10:08, 19 August 2010 (UTC) 68:10:08, 19 August 2010 (UTC) 1145: 806:“Is that the case or not?” 495:1. Detrimental; injurious. 448:Therefore, I respectfully 657:Skyeking’s User Talk Page 116:Skyeking’s User Talk Page 39: 34:Knowledge Mediation Cabal 18:Knowledge:Mediation Cabal 1052:My choice is to "Close". 440:(WP:COI / WP:OWNER) to 308:EDITOR: 207.61.241.100 907:Clarification request: 177:”) from the article’s 710:With reservations, I 487:NOTE 2 – Definitions: 268:diametrically opposed 262:NOTE 2 – Definitions: 110:Where is the dispute? 956:Comment from Nuujinn 403:Administrative Notes 160:What is the dispute? 705:historical research 149:User:207.61.241.100 980:SKYEKING response: 799:SKYEKING response: 570:SKYEKING response: 429:SKYEKING response: 102: 101: 1136: 1029: 974: 719:choose the case. 510:muddy the waters 227:EDITOR: Skyeking 165:Contested Edits: 138:Who is involved? 105:Request Details: 73:Requesting party 44: 30: 1144: 1143: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1119: 1118: 1044: 1020: 965: 958: 655:is located at 524: 501:unsubstantiated 414: 405: 358: 331: 321: 162: 140: 112: 107: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 1142: 1140: 1132: 1131: 1121: 1120: 1116: 1114: 1113: 1100: 1099: 1096: 1095: 1092: 1087: 1085: 1084: 1068: 1067: 1055: 1053: 1051: 1049: 1047: 1043: 1040: 1038: 1037: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1015: 1014: 1002: 1000: 999: 997: 995: 994: 992: 988: 986: 984: 983: 981: 979: 978: 957: 954: 952: 951: 950: 948: 934: 933: 921: 917: 915: 914: 913: 912: 911: 908: 902: 901: 897: 896: 895: 894: 891: 890: 889:Clarification: 884: 883: 879: 878: 874: 873: 869: 868: 863: 861: 860: 859: 857: 855: 854: 852: 851: 849: 848: 845: 841: 839: 837: 836: 822: 818: 816: 814: 813: 811: 807: 805: 803: 802: 800: 798: 796: 795: 794: 781: 778: 774: 770: 764: 763: 761: 747: 746: 734: 732: 731: 724: 723: 721: 720: 717: 716: 709: 708: 702: 701: 699: 698: 697: 692: 691: 689: 687: 685: 684: 683: 674: 673: 671: 669: 668: 650: 648: 647: 646: 641: 639: 637: 636: 635: 629: 628: 627: 621: 620: 619: 614: 612: 610: 609: 608: 603: 601: 599: 597: 596: 595: 590: 588: 586: 585: 581: 576:First, please 573: 571: 569: 568: 566: 564: 562: 561: 558: 556: 555: 554: 553: 541: 539: 533: 532: 531: 527: 523: 521: 519: 515: 513: 507: 506: 504: 499: 498: 496: 494: 489: 488: 486: 485: 484: 480: 478: 476: 474: 473: 469: 467: 465: 463: 462: 460: 459: 458: 456: 454: 453: 445: 432: 430: 428: 427: 424: 422: 421: 420: 418: 416: 413: 410: 408: 407: 404: 401: 400: 399: 386: 382: 378: 368: 367: 364: 363: 361: 357: 356:Mediator Notes 354: 352: 351: 339: 337: 336: 334: 330: 327: 325: 324: 320: 317: 315: 314: 313: 312: 311: 309: 307: 306: 305: 303: 298: 297: 295: 290: 289: 287: 282: 281: 279: 274: 273: 271: 263: 261: 260: 259: 253: 252: 246: 244: 243: 241: 240: 230: 228: 225: 224: 219: 218: 207: 206: 201: 199: 198: 197: 189: 188: 182: 167: 166: 161: 158: 157: 156: 151: 146: 139: 136: 134: 133: 128: 127: 111: 108: 106: 103: 100: 99: 89: 85: 84: 74: 70: 69: 66: 62: 61: 58: 54: 53: 50: 46: 45: 37: 36: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1141: 1130: 1127: 1126: 1124: 1117: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1101: 1098:Wiki Regards, 1097: 1093: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1054:Wiki Regards, 1041: 1039: 1032: 1027: 1023: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1001:Wiki Regards, 989: 977: 972: 968: 963: 955: 953: 946: 942: 938: 932: 928: 924: 920:Wiki Regards, 918: 909: 906: 905: 904: 903: 899: 898: 892: 888: 887: 886: 885: 881: 880: 876: 875: 871: 870: 866: 865: 864: 842: 834: 830: 829:clarification 826: 819: 808: 793: 789: 785: 782: 779: 775: 771: 767: 766: 765: 759: 755: 751: 745: 741: 737: 733:Wiki Regards, 728: 713: 706: 695: 694: 693: 681: 677: 676: 675: 666: 662: 658: 654: 644: 643: 642: 634: 631: 630: 626: 623: 622: 617: 616: 615: 606: 605: 604: 593: 592: 591: 582: 579: 574: 552: 548: 544: 540:Wiki Regards, 537: 530: 520: 516: 511: 502: 492: 483: 472: 451: 446: 443: 438: 437:justification 433: 411: 409: 402: 398: 394: 390: 387: 383: 379: 375: 371: 370: 369: 355: 353: 350: 346: 342: 328: 326: 318: 316: 301: 293: 285: 277: 269: 264: 257: 256:three-seconds 250: 238: 234: 222: 221: 220: 216: 212: 204: 203: 202: 195: 191: 190: 186: 185: 184: 180: 176: 172: 164: 163: 159: 155: 152: 150: 147: 145: 144:User:Skyeking 142: 141: 137: 135: 132: 125: 121: 117: 109: 104: 97: 93: 90: 86: 82: 78: 75: 71: 67: 63: 59: 55: 51: 47: 43: 38: 35: 31: 23: 19: 1115: 1086: 1045: 1042:Case Closure 1036: 990: 961: 959: 919: 916: 843: 828: 820: 809: 797: 711: 700: 688:Question #6: 686: 679: 670:Question #5: 652: 649: 640:Question #4: 638: 613:Question #3: 611: 600:Question #2: 598: 587:Question #1: 583: 577: 575: 535: 525: 517: 509: 500: 490: 449: 447: 434: 415: 406: 373: 359: 332: 322: 310:(Conclusion) 299: 291: 283: 275: 267: 265: 255: 236: 232: 229:(Conclusion) 226: 214: 210: 208: 200: 193: 178: 168: 154:User:Nuujinn 113: 65:Request date 491:prejudicial 249:perpetually 215:voluntarily 88:Mediator(s) 838:Bobrayner: 815:Bobrayner: 804:Bobrayner: 563:Bobrayner: 423:Bobrayner: 412:Discussion 284:conclusion 276:contention 1074:bobrayner 1046:QUESTION: 991:Skyeking: 935:STATUS – 844:Skyeking: 833:mediation 825:mediation 821:Skyeking: 810:Skyeking: 784:bobrayner 748:STATUS – 727:mediation 665:Section 6 661:Section 5 557:PROLOGUE: 417:PROLOGUE: 389:bobrayner 374:extremely 300:volunteer 209:The word 129:Article: 124:Section 6 120:Section 5 92:bobrayner 1123:Category 1103:Skyeking 1057:Skyeking 1004:Skyeking 985:Nuujinn: 937:Skyeking 923:Skyeking 750:Skyeking 736:Skyeking 715:methods. 680:innocent 543:Skyeking 341:Skyeking 211:altruism 181:section. 179:See Also 175:Morality 171:Altruism 77:Skyeking 20:‎ | 1022:Nuujinn 967:Nuujinn 777:raised? 653:impasse 578:clarify 536:decline 461:NOTE 1: 450:decline 442:Nuujinn 292:context 245:NOTE 1: 49:Article 962:per se 560:Notes. 426:below: 366:below: 60:Closed 57:Status 996:NOTE: 856:NOTE: 730:case. 712:might 385:help. 381:that. 372:I am 173:” / “ 22:Cases 16:< 1107:talk 1078:talk 1061:talk 1026:talk 1008:talk 971:talk 941:talk 927:talk 788:talk 754:talk 740:talk 663:and 547:talk 393:talk 345:talk 122:and 96:talk 81:talk 360:Hi, 237:not 233:not 194:not 1125:: 1109:) 1080:) 1063:) 1010:) 943:) 929:) 790:) 756:) 742:) 659:/ 549:) 395:) 347:) 270:”: 118:/ 1105:( 1076:( 1059:( 1028:) 1024:( 1006:( 973:) 969:( 947:: 939:( 925:( 786:( 760:: 752:( 738:( 667:. 545:( 512:” 508:“ 503:: 493:: 391:( 343:( 302:: 294:: 286:: 278:: 266:“ 126:. 98:) 94:( 83:) 79:(

Index

Knowledge:Mediation Cabal
Cases
Knowledge Mediation Cabal

Skyeking
talk
bobrayner
talk
Skyeking’s User Talk Page
Section 5
Section 6
Voluntary Human Extinction Movement
User:Skyeking
User:207.61.241.100
User:Nuujinn
Altruism
Morality
perpetually
Skyeking
talk
10:08, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
bobrayner
talk
02:35, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
justification
Nuujinn
http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Jagerman
http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Voluntary_Human_Extinction_Movement#Notability_and_single-source
http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Bobrayner#Voluntary_Human_Extinction_Movement
Skyeking

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑