368:, Lance Armstrong's team, didn't get invites to every race they wanted. It wasn't so much a decision to exclude the Dutch teams as it was that they were probably #23 and #24 on the list of 22 teams to get invites, since the top 14 couldn't be changed. There's a new agreement for 2011 that the top 17 teams in the
244:
Thank you. This is not a "drive-by post". It is an attempt to get more editors involved in the review process, and appears on all new PR nominations when the backlog reaches a certain level. I am sorry that you have taken offence; I assure you that your review efforts are appreciated, and hope that
309:
I note you indicated the footnote with . When having to use a footnote, as opposed to a reference, I'll use letters (A, B, C...) instead of numbers to avoid any confusion between the two, but this a personal preference so there is no obilgation for you to actually listen to
153:. I've listed this article for peer review because… I'd like to get it to FA. I think it could probably pass GA right now, and I'll go there next, but it's definitely a bit wet behind the ears right now and could use some new eyes looking at it.
425:
This would normally be the part where I'd use the PR reviewer's rethoric and ask you to "consider reviewing an article in the backlog" but as seeing how you have already done so... Thanks for reviewing and keep up the good work!
187:: Due to a shortage of reviewers, peer reviews are being delayed for up to two weeks. It will help to speed things up if you can find time to review one article from the backlog list, which appears on the
372:
will get the guaranteed slots next year, meaning this very easily could pop up again. Race organizers usually like to include local teams (hence
Androni-Giocattoli, Acqua e Sapone, Colnago) first anyway.
382:"...the following classifications by race organizers Gazzetta dello Sport: four time trials (three individual and one team, seven flat stages, five mixed stages, and six mountain stages."
213:
318:"a return to the original colour scheme for the three minor classifications that reflected the colours of the Italian flag, the points' competition leader was indicated by a red jersey"
475:
Thanks for the review
Niagara. Past experience tells me I'm unlikely to get more than one review, and I think the article is ready for GAN anyway, so I'm closing this.
417:
Don't usually follow / read / review cycling-related topics, but this was interesting and a refreshing change. I agree with you on that this could easily be a GA.
346:
126:
76:
324:
I don't think this is actually lead-worthy. It was put there when there was very little information present on the race, a year or so ago at this time.
122:
107:
210:
99:
512:
69:
491:
462:
232:
172:
498:
440:
200:
179:
62:
469:
254:
239:
50:
216:. Whenever I list an article or two or three at PR or GAN, I always take that same number (if not more) myself.
44:
115:
369:
342:
250:
196:
17:
406:
92:
385:
There is a missing right parentheses ) that is needed in the sentence, possibly after "one team".
282:
485:
456:
246:
226:
192:
166:
402:
365:
506:
476:
447:
429:
271:
217:
188:
157:
409:
finish ahead, often crossing the line one or two at a time (hence "mass" sprint).
405:
attempt to get the stage win. These contrast with the mountain stages, where
289:) between a number and its unit. (22 teams, 20 minutes, 21 stages, etc.)
301:
364:
There's just a lot of top-level teams in the sport this year. Even
361:
Was there ever a reason given for not inviting the Dutch teams?
401:
Stages in which the majority of the field is together and the
259:
Sorry, I was in a bit of bitchy mood, and it seemed really imp
300:
The largest group of cyclists in the race. Suppose a link to
321:
I'd include what the green and white jerseys were used for.
141:
134:
103:
338:very turbulent...". Also what is the "overall"?
331:"The overall very turbulent in the first week,"
395:"...which figured into end in mass sprints,"
70:
8:
150:This peer review discussion has been closed.
347:General classification in the Giro d'Italia
245:you will continue to help the PR process.
77:
63:
32:
35:
398:Unsure of what it is being said here.
7:
24:
1:
341:The overall standings. The
529:
499:21:39, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
470:00:43, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
446:Thanks for the comments.
441:15:06, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
255:23:25, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
240:23:50, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
201:23:23, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
180:06:24, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
513:August 2010 peer reviews
207:Note to drive-by poster
370:2010 UCI World Ranking
343:General classification
297:What is a "peloton"?
18:Knowledge:Peer review
407:climbing specialists
281:Make sure there are
26:
283:non-breaking spaces
28:2010 Giro d'Italia
497:
468:
403:cycling sprinters
378:Route and stages
238:
185:Note to nominator
178:
142:Watch peer review
87:
86:
520:
494:
488:
483:
481:
465:
459:
454:
452:
439:
436:
434:
288:
261:
260:
235:
229:
224:
222:
175:
169:
164:
162:
139:
130:
111:
79:
72:
65:
47:
33:
528:
527:
523:
522:
521:
519:
518:
517:
503:
502:
492:
486:
477:
463:
457:
448:
437:
430:
427:
366:Team RadioShack
286:
233:
227:
218:
173:
167:
158:
145:
120:
97:
91:
83:
51:Manual of Style
43:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
526:
524:
516:
515:
505:
504:
473:
472:
423:
422:
421:Eeexcellent :)
415:
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
393:
392:
391:
390:
389:
376:
375:
374:
373:
355:
354:
353:
352:
351:
350:
329:
328:
327:
326:
325:
312:
311:
307:
306:
305:
295:
294:
293:
270:Comments from
267:
266:
265:
264:
263:
262:
211:I have already
191:page. Thanks.
152:
147:
146:
144:
90:
85:
84:
82:
81:
74:
67:
59:
56:
55:
54:
53:
48:
38:
37:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
525:
514:
511:
510:
508:
501:
500:
495:
489:
482:
480:
471:
466:
460:
453:
451:
445:
444:
443:
442:
435:
433:
420:
419:
418:
408:
404:
400:
399:
397:
396:
394:
387:
386:
384:
383:
381:
380:
379:
371:
367:
363:
362:
360:
359:
358:
348:
344:
340:
339:
337:
334:"The overall
333:
332:
330:
323:
322:
320:
319:
317:
316:
315:
308:
303:
299:
298:
296:
291:
290:
284:
280:
279:
278:
275:
274:
273:
258:
257:
256:
252:
248:
243:
242:
241:
236:
230:
223:
221:
215:
212:
208:
205:
204:
203:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
182:
181:
176:
170:
163:
161:
154:
151:
143:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
89:
88:
80:
75:
73:
68:
66:
61:
60:
58:
57:
52:
49:
46:
45:Copying check
42:
41:
40:
39:
34:
29:
19:
478:
474:
449:
431:
424:
416:
377:
356:
335:
313:
276:
269:
268:
247:Brianboulton
219:
206:
193:Brianboulton
184:
183:
159:
155:
149:
148:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
27:
388:Good catch.
104:visual edit
304:will help?
287:
507:Category
493:Contribs
464:Contribs
292:Will do.
277:General
234:Contribs
174:Contribs
156:Thanks,
479:Nosleep
450:Nosleep
432:Niagara
349:even :P
302:peloton
272:Niagara
220:Nosleep
214:done so
160:Nosleep
127:history
108:history
94:Article
36:Toolbox
426:
357:Teams
345:. The
314:Intro
310:me ;-)
189:WP:PR
136:Watch
16:<
487:Talk
458:Talk
251:talk
228:Talk
197:talk
168:Talk
123:edit
100:edit
336:was
509::
490:·
461:·
438:
428:
253:)
231:·
209::
199:)
171:·
140:•
125:|
106:|
102:|
496:)
484:(
467:)
455:(
285:(
249:(
237:)
225:(
195:(
177:)
165:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
78:e
71:t
64:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.