324:: If the subject of the article is a book or film or other artistic work, it is unnecessary to cite a source in describing events or other details. It should be obvious to potential readers that the subject of the article is the source of the information. If the subject of the article is a work that has been published or broadcast in a serial manner, then citing the episode, issue or book can aid comprehension for readers not familiar with the whole of the serial work. It also aids verification if editors are concerned about inappropriate use of the artistic work (
39:
363:
section of non-controversial subjects is less likely to be challenged and less likely to require a source. There is not, however, an exception to citation requirements specific to leads. Complex, current, or controversial subjects may require many citations; others, few or none. Contentious material about living persons must always be cited, regardless of the level of generality.
398:: Any editor has the right to challenge unsourced material by opening a discussion on the talk page or by tagging it. Material that should be removed without discussion includes unsourced contentious material about a living person, clear examples of original research, and anything that is ludicrous or damaging to the project.
414:: Editors who wish to respond to the challenge should do so in a timely manner. If no response is forthcoming, the challenger may tag or remove the statement in question. Unless the material falls into the class that should be removed without discussion, the challenger should await a timely response prior to removing.
362:
Because the lead will usually repeat information also in the body, editors should balance the desire to avoid redundant citations in the lead with the desire to aid readers in locating sources. Leads are usually written at a greater level of generality than the body, and information in the lead
258:
Claims that are contradicted by the prevailing view within the relevant community, or which would significantly alter mainstream assumptions, especially in science, medicine, history, politics, and biographies of living persons, and especially when proponents consider that there is a
220:
is often appropriate, especially for statements describing a person's published opinions or words. In-text attribution is not appropriate for other forms of close paraphrasing, such as if you paraphrase "The sky is usually blue" as "The sky is often the color
342:, as it is a generalization of the cited body text. Subleads (generalized opening statements summarizing specific sections, paragraphs, etc.) may also be verified by the citations of the following text. It is permissible to cite such content (including with
377:
The distance between material and its source is a matter of editorial judgment. The source of the material should always be clear, and editors should exercise caution when rearranging cited material to ensure that the text–source relationship isn't broken.
381:
If you write a multi-sentence paragraph that draws on material from one source, the source need not be cited after every single sentence unless the material is particularly contentious. When multiple sources are used within a paragraph, these can be
201:
when quoting published material, whether within quotation marks or not, whether using direct or indirect speech. When using footnotes, the citation should be placed in the first footnote after the quotation.
181:
Material that is actually challenged by another editor requires a source or it may be removed; and anything likely to incur a reasonable challenge should be sourced to avoid disputes and to aid readers (see
473:
235:
Knowledge (XXG) page. Such material requires a high degree of sensitivity; do not leave unsourced information that may damage the reputation of living persons or organizations in articles.
478:
301:
176:
28:
429:
357:
498:
318:: Statements that the average adult recognizes as true. Examples: "The capital of France is Paris" or "Humans normally have two arms and two legs."
255:
Reports of a statement by someone that seems out of character, embarrassing, controversial, or against an interest they had previously defended;
273:: Opinions, data and statistics, and statements based on someone's scientific work should be cited and attributed to their authors in the text.
106:
483:
305:
60:
434:
190:
is backed by an inline citation. In case of multiple possible references for a statement, the best reliable sources should be used.
164:: Maintain text–source integrity by placing inline citations in a way that makes clear which source supports which part of the text.
439:
309:
134:
47:
408:. Editors making a challenge should have reason to believe the material is contentious, false, or otherwise inappropriate.
456:
372:
444:
114:
51:
461:
59:
This page provides additional information about concepts in the page(s) it supplements. This page is not one of
383:
213:
148:: Cite your sources in the form of an inline citation after the phrase, sentence, or paragraph in question.
160:
64:
283:
74:
404:: Challenges should not be made frivolously or casually, and should never be made to be disruptive or
335:
242:
217:
203:
198:
183:
152:
144:
130:
126:
110:
405:
386:
if desired, so long as the footnote makes clear which source supports which points in the text.
260:
325:
228:
122:
492:
118:
17:
339:
241:: Exceptional claims in Knowledge (XXG) require high-quality reliable sources (see
156:: Add in-text attribution whenever you copy or closely paraphrase a source's words.
345:
Sublead generalization supported by all the citations in this section</ref: -->
27:"WP:WHEN" redirects here. For the manual of style on chronological items, see
252:
Surprising or apparently important claims not covered by mainstream sources;
29:
Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style/Dates and numbers § Chronological items
137:. You can make clear which sources support your article using:
334:: If the article mentions the fact repeatedly, it suffices to
102:
Explanatory essay about the
Knowledge (XXG):Verifiability page
33:
479:
Knowledge (XXG):You don't need to cite that the sky is blue
302:
Knowledge (XXG):You don't need to cite that the sky is blue
474:
User:Piotrus/Wikipedia:Why most sentences should be cited
177:
Knowledge (XXG):You do need to cite that the sky is blue
117:
requires inline citations for quotations, whether using
291:
89:
82:
373:
Knowledge (XXG):Citing sources § Text–source integrity
338:. Uncontroversial content in the lead section is
113:where appropriate. The English Knowledge (XXG)'s
430:Knowledge (XXG):Biographies of living persons
8:
358:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style/Lead section
278:When a source or citation may not be needed
229:biographical material about a living person
227:: Editors must take particular care adding
225:Contentious statements about living people
125:, and for material that is challenged or
133:whenever a source's words are copied or
61:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
306:Knowledge (XXG):Likely to be challenged
484:Knowledge (XXG):Must I add a citation?
435:Knowledge (XXG):Neutral point of view
7:
440:Knowledge (XXG):No original research
310:Knowledge (XXG):The Pope is Catholic
499:Knowledge (XXG) supplemental pages
402:Challenges should not be frivolous
322:Plot of the subject of the article
129:. Editors are also advised to add
65:thoroughly vetted by the community
25:
107:list of featured-article criteria
390:Challenging another user's edits
186:). In practice, this means that
37:
457:Knowledge (XXG):Citing sources
384:bundled into a single footnote
332:Cited elsewhere in the article
212:: Add an inline citation when
1:
445:Knowledge (XXG):Verifiability
412:Responses must be forthcoming
52:Knowledge (XXG):Verifiability
462:Knowledge (XXG):Lead section
515:
370:
355:
299:
281:
174:
72:
26:
367:Text–source relationship
316:General common knowledge
171:When a source is needed
127:likely to be challenged
396:The right to challenge
389:
347:), but not mandatory.
328:) for interpretation.
206:is often appropriate.
216:a source's words.
214:closely paraphrasing
115:Verifiability policy
18:Knowledge (XXG):WHEN
218:In-text attribution
204:In-text attribution
135:closely paraphrased
131:in-text attribution
63:as it has not been
352:Citations in leads
239:Exceptional claims
210:Close paraphrasing
100:
99:
48:explanatory essay
16:(Redirected from
506:
346:
326:a primary source
294:
263:to silence them.
111:inline citations
92:
85:
41:
40:
34:
21:
514:
513:
509:
508:
507:
505:
504:
503:
489:
488:
421:
406:to make a point
392:
375:
369:
360:
354:
343:
340:often not cited
312:
298:
297:
290:
286:
280:
199:inline citation
179:
173:
123:indirect speech
103:
96:
95:
88:
81:
77:
69:
68:
38:
32:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
512:
510:
502:
501:
491:
490:
487:
486:
481:
476:
470:
469:
465:
464:
459:
453:
452:
448:
447:
442:
437:
432:
426:
425:
420:
417:
416:
415:
409:
399:
391:
388:
368:
365:
353:
350:
349:
348:
329:
319:
296:
295:
287:
282:
279:
276:
275:
274:
267:
266:
265:
264:
256:
253:
247:
246:
236:
222:
207:
172:
169:
168:
167:
166:
165:
157:
149:
101:
98:
97:
94:
93:
86:
78:
73:
70:
58:
57:
44:
42:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
511:
500:
497:
496:
494:
485:
482:
480:
477:
475:
472:
471:
467:
466:
463:
460:
458:
455:
454:
450:
449:
446:
443:
441:
438:
436:
433:
431:
428:
427:
423:
422:
418:
413:
410:
407:
403:
400:
397:
394:
393:
387:
385:
379:
374:
366:
364:
359:
351:
341:
337:
333:
330:
327:
323:
320:
317:
314:
313:
311:
307:
303:
293:
289:
288:
285:
277:
272:
269:
268:
262:
257:
254:
251:
250:
249:
248:
244:
240:
237:
234:
230:
226:
223:
219:
215:
211:
208:
205:
200:
196:
193:
192:
191:
189:
188:most material
185:
178:
170:
163:
162:
158:
155:
154:
150:
147:
146:
142:
141:
140:
139:
138:
136:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
91:
87:
84:
80:
79:
76:
71:
66:
62:
55:
53:
49:
43:
36:
35:
30:
19:
411:
401:
395:
380:
376:
361:
344:<ref: -->
336:cite it once
331:
321:
315:
270:
238:
232:
224:
209:
194:
187:
180:
159:
151:
143:
104:
45:
371:Main page:
356:Main page:
46:This is an
451:Guidelines
300:See also:
292:WP:NOTCITE
261:conspiracy
243:WP:REDFLAG
195:Quotations
175:See also:
109:calls for
50:about the
197:: Add an
184:WP:BURDEN
161:INTEGRITY
75:Shortcuts
493:Category
424:Policies
419:See also
284:Shortcut
90:WP:WHEN
468:Essays
308:, and
221:blue".
153:INTEXT
145:INCITE
119:direct
83:WP:WTC
271:Other
105:The
54:page
233:any
231:to
121:or
495::
304:,
245:):
56:.
67:.
31:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.