87:
63:
131:
32:
424:
The importance rating I'll leave to you guys, my knowledge isnt sufficient to really judge why one not the other. There is one point Alex George IMHO should be Top rated as he is the main reference for almost if not all articles about the plants. with that also the
Banksia Atlas should be high
163:
I wonder if we could establish some guidelines for the importance rating. The crux of the importance assessment, as I understand it, is this: If we decided to produce a print or CD edition of
Banksia articles, how important would it be for the article to be included?
425:
importance. This doesnt mean they need major articles created but in relation to the subject matter both of these are significant references. Remember that the rating is not just how wikipedia uses the articles is also about how external people use wikipedia
179:
I previously rated all the species articles as "mid", but I regret that. I now think all the species articles should be at least "high", because it would be a pretty crappy print edition that didn't include all the species. Well known iconic species should be
183:
The subgenus, section and series articles probably should be "mid" importance, as one can easily imagine producing a good print edition that didn't include them. One could make a case for
448:
443:
463:
458:
453:
17:
105:
94:
68:
311:
140:
73:
43:
333:
265:
281:
202:
184:
86:
62:
429:
205:
49:
247:
409:
376:
130:
426:
352:
294:
437:
392:
194:, which should be at least mid, since there is a chance of it being rolled into
201:
Below is a draft table of importance guidelines. Can we edit up a consensus?
363:
191:
231:
172:
100:
325:
Well known subspecies and varieties should be "Mid"; otherwise "Low".
104:
and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
98:, which aims to improve Knowledge's coverage of the plant genus
25:
129:
303:
Well known species should be "Top"; otherwise "High".
279:Well known and important infrageneric taxa such as
400:"High" for George, otherwise "Low" to "Mid".
8:
57:
42:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
209:
59:
7:
187:, to be "high", but that's about it.
31:
29:
190:Related taxa should be low, except
48:It is of interest to the following
24:
18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Banksia
159:Guidelines for importance rating
85:
61:
30:
449:NA-importance Banksia articles
444:Project-Class Banksia articles
1:
114:Knowledge:WikiProject Banksia
464:WikiProject Banksia articles
459:NA-importance plant articles
454:Project-Class plant articles
117:Template:WikiProject Banksia
361:Generally "Low", "Mid" for
480:
138:This page is supported by
430:03:35, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
206:01:47, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
137:
80:
56:
415:Generally "Low" to "Mid"
185:Banksia subg. Isostylis
134:
133:
92:This page is part of
313:Banksia integrifolia
176:is obviously "top".
95:WikiProject Banksia
244:Specialty articles
141:WikiProject Plants
135:
44:content assessment
421:
420:
410:The Banksia Atlas
262:Infrageneric taxa
156:
155:
152:
151:
148:
147:
471:
308:Subspecific taxa
210:
122:
121:
120:Banksia articles
118:
115:
112:
89:
82:
81:
76:
65:
58:
35:
34:
33:
26:
479:
478:
474:
473:
472:
470:
469:
468:
434:
433:
397:"Low" to "High"
377:Banksieaeformis
337:'Giant Candles'
300:"High" to "Top"
285:may be "High".
276:"Mid" to "High"
167:Based on that:
161:
119:
116:
113:
110:
109:
71:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
477:
475:
467:
466:
461:
456:
451:
446:
436:
435:
423:
419:
418:
416:
413:
406:
402:
401:
398:
395:
390:
386:
385:
383:
380:
373:
369:
368:
359:
358:"Low" to "Mid"
356:
353:Austromuellera
349:
348:Related genera
345:
344:
342:
339:
331:
327:
326:
323:
322:"Low" to "Mid"
320:
309:
305:
304:
301:
298:
295:Banksia aemula
291:
287:
286:
277:
274:
263:
259:
258:
256:
255:"Mid" to "Top"
253:
245:
241:
240:
238:
235:
228:
224:
223:
220:
219:Typical rating
217:
214:
199:
198:
188:
181:
177:
160:
157:
154:
153:
150:
149:
146:
145:
136:
126:
125:
123:
90:
78:
77:
66:
54:
53:
47:
36:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
476:
465:
462:
460:
457:
455:
452:
450:
447:
445:
442:
441:
439:
432:
431:
428:
417:
414:
412:
411:
407:
404:
403:
399:
396:
394:
391:
388:
387:
384:
381:
379:
378:
374:
371:
370:
366:
365:
360:
357:
355:
354:
350:
347:
346:
343:
340:
338:
336:
332:
329:
328:
324:
321:
319:
318:
314:
310:
307:
306:
302:
299:
297:
296:
292:
289:
288:
284:
283:
278:
275:
273:
272:
268:
264:
261:
260:
257:
254:
252:
251:
246:
243:
242:
239:
236:
234:
233:
229:
226:
225:
221:
218:
215:
212:
211:
208:
207:
204:
197:
193:
189:
186:
182:
178:
175:
174:
170:
169:
168:
165:
158:
143:
142:
132:
128:
127:
124:
107:
103:
102:
97:
96:
91:
88:
84:
83:
79:
75:
70:
67:
64:
60:
55:
51:
45:
41:
37:
28:
27:
19:
422:
408:
375:
362:
351:
334:
316:
312:
293:
280:
270:
266:
249:
248:Taxonomy of
230:
213:Article type
203:Snottygobble
200:
195:
171:
166:
162:
139:
106:project page
99:
93:
50:WikiProjects
40:project page
39:
393:Alex George
222:Guidelines
438:Categories
271:Oncostylis
427:Gnangarra
389:Botanists
330:Cultivars
317:aquilonia
282:Isostylis
364:Dryandra
192:Dryandra
372:Fossils
335:Banksia
290:Species
267:Banksia
250:Banksia
232:Banksia
216:Example
196:Banksia
173:Banksia
111:Banksia
101:Banksia
69:Banksia
269:sect.
180:"top".
74:Plants
46:scale.
405:Other
382:"Low"
341:"Low"
315:var.
237:"Top"
227:Genus
38:This
16:<
440::
367:.
72::
144:.
108:.
52::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
