Knowledge (XXG)

Zelen's design

Source 📝

60:
In comparison, the current predominant design is for consent to be solicited prior to randomization. That is, eligible patients are asked if they would agree to participate in the clinical trial as a whole. This entails agreeing to receiving the experimental treatment as a possibility, receiving the
56:
In this design, those patients receiving standard care need not be consented for participation in the study other than possibly for privacy issues. On the other hand, those patients randomized to the experimental group are consented as usual, except that they are consenting to the certainty of
98:
Ethical drawbacks. Palmer (2002) notes, "in the few trials where was employed it has been met with disapproval from participants and others, being deemed inappropriately deceptive and manipulative, at least in trials for serious or life-threatening
92:
Contamination by crossing over may be more likely since patients assigned to the treatment group are fully aware of their assignment. Notably, statistical analysis should be performed with intention-to-treat.
76:
Patients correspondingly are not subjected to the uncomfortable feeling that they may or may not be receiving the experimental treatment. This means effects such as
80:
will not become an issue. Analogously, since patients allocated to the standard care group are not necessarily aware of the existence of an alternative treatment,
272: 73:
Clinicians are more comfortable with this design because each time consent is only sought for one treatment without the uncertainty of randomization.
139: 109: 57:
receiving the experimental treatment only; alternatively these patients can decline and receive the standard treatment instead.
211:
Palmer, C. R. (2002). "Ethics, data-dependent designs, and the strategy of clinical trials: time to start learning-as-we-go?".
31: 288: 114: 37: 119: 293: 275:, Lifetime Data Analysis, Issue Volume 10, Number 4 / December, 2004. DOI 10.1007/s10985-004-4769-7, Pages 321-323. 27: 77: 220: 48:. Because the group to which a given patient is assigned is known, consent can be sought conditionally. 225: 23: 254: 41: 246: 238: 199: 156: 230: 189: 181: 148: 81: 45: 194: 169: 282: 69:
There are a number of advantages conferred by the post-randomization consent design.
258: 34: 61:
control treatment as a possibility, and the uncertainty involved in not knowing.
152: 40:(1927-2014). In this design, patients are randomized to either the treatment or 234: 124: 242: 185: 250: 203: 160: 137:
Zelen, Marvin (1979). "A New Design for Randomized Clinical Trials".
95:
Lack of allocation concealment, which may produce further bias.
273:
Introduction to the Special Issue Dedicated to Marvin Zelen
8: 224: 193: 213:Statistical Methods in Medical Research 16:Experimental design for clinical trials 65:Statistical and epidemiological issues 168:Torgerson, D. J.; Roland, M. (1998). 7: 140:The New England Journal of Medicine 110:Cluster randomised controlled trial 14: 32:Harvard School of Public Health 115:Marvin Zelen (biostatistician) 1: 88:Some disadvantages include: 153:10.1056/NEJM197905313002203 120:Randomized controlled trial 310: 28:randomized clinical trials 235:10.1191/0962280202sm298ra 170:"What is Zelen's design?" 84:is also less of an issue. 186:10.1136/bmj.316.7131.606 78:resentful demoralization 289:Design of experiments 24:experimental design 294:Clinical research 147:(22): 1242–1245. 301: 262: 228: 207: 197: 164: 82:Hawthorne effect 46:informed consent 309: 308: 304: 303: 302: 300: 299: 298: 279: 278: 269: 226:10.1.1.128.9963 210: 167: 136: 133: 106: 67: 54: 17: 12: 11: 5: 307: 305: 297: 296: 291: 281: 280: 277: 276: 268: 267:External links 265: 264: 263: 219:(5): 381–402. 208: 165: 132: 129: 128: 127: 122: 117: 112: 105: 102: 101: 100: 96: 93: 86: 85: 74: 66: 63: 53: 50: 44:before giving 20:Zelen's design 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 306: 295: 292: 290: 287: 286: 284: 274: 271: 270: 266: 260: 256: 252: 248: 244: 240: 236: 232: 227: 222: 218: 214: 209: 205: 201: 196: 191: 187: 183: 180:(7131): 606. 179: 175: 171: 166: 162: 158: 154: 150: 146: 142: 141: 135: 134: 130: 126: 123: 121: 118: 116: 113: 111: 108: 107: 103: 97: 94: 91: 90: 89: 83: 79: 75: 72: 71: 70: 64: 62: 58: 51: 49: 47: 43: 42:control group 39: 36: 33: 29: 25: 21: 216: 212: 177: 173: 144: 138: 99:conditions." 87: 68: 59: 55: 38:Marvin Zelen 35:statistician 30:proposed by 19: 18: 283:Categories 131:References 125:Statistics 243:0962-2802 221:CiteSeerX 251:12357585 104:See also 52:Overview 259:1818466 204:9518917 195:1112637 257:  249:  241:  223:  202:  192:  161:431682 159:  22:is an 255:S2CID 247:PMID 239:ISSN 200:PMID 157:PMID 26:for 231:doi 190:PMC 182:doi 178:316 174:BMJ 149:doi 145:300 285:: 253:. 245:. 237:. 229:. 217:11 215:. 198:. 188:. 176:. 172:. 155:. 143:. 261:. 233:: 206:. 184:: 163:. 151::

Index

experimental design
randomized clinical trials
Harvard School of Public Health
statistician
Marvin Zelen
control group
informed consent
resentful demoralization
Hawthorne effect
Cluster randomised controlled trial
Marvin Zelen (biostatistician)
Randomized controlled trial
Statistics
The New England Journal of Medicine
doi
10.1056/NEJM197905313002203
PMID
431682
"What is Zelen's design?"
doi
10.1136/bmj.316.7131.606
PMC
1112637
PMID
9518917
CiteSeerX
10.1.1.128.9963
doi
10.1191/0962280202sm298ra
ISSN

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.